The Wheels On The Bus Are Falling Off, Falling Off...
OK, I stole that line from Jeff, who used it last year...
And it's way too early to panic, what with the Cubs' record 12-12, hardly horrid (need I remind you: the 2002 World Champion Angels started 16-22).
But they are looking worse each day. Today's awful 9-3 loss to the Astros was bad on SO many levels, I hardly know where to begin.
Let me begin with the broadcasters, who are beginning to annoy me. I actually like(d) Bob Brenly because he knows the game, has a pleasant voice, and knows how to be a color commentator (i.e. knows when to talk and when not to) -- but I'm starting to agree with those who say they are apologists for management.
In the late innings, after the game was long lost, there was an extended shot of Jason Dubois in the dugout. What do we get? Thoughts that maybe Dubois might play?
No, what we heard was more of "he'll get his at-bats" and "Dusty's trying to find the right matchups".
Please. And especially today, when Todd Hollandsworth had another ugly-looking 0-for-4. Big deal, he had an outfield assist, his first of the year. He rainbowed a throw that Michael Barrett had to come up the line to field, and then reach back to tag Jeff Bagwell, hardly the game's fastest runner, out at the plate. On this play Bagwell ought to have been out by twenty feet, but Hollandsworth made it a close play.
Let's get Dubois in there every day for a week. How much worse could the results be?
Or maybe we should talk about the way the Cubs made the anemic Astros offense look good. In winning two of three, Houston scored eighteen runs in the three games. Before Friday, they had scored twenty runs in their six previous games, including being shut out three times, twice in a row by the Pirates, for heaven's sake.
This game was actually going along swimmingly, the Cubs leading 3-1 and cruising behind Mark Prior before Prior decided to throw what Patrick Michael, writing in the Cubs Usenet newsgroup, termed "the hawkins".
That's a good one -- wish I could take credit for it. But that's what we're going to call, from now on, a fat 0-2 pitch that should have been wasted and instead goes for a damaging home run. Prior threw not one, but two "hawkinses" in the fifth inning (one to Mike Lamb for a grand slam, Lamb's first home run this year, and three batters later, another to Adam Everett, all with two out), and as a result his lovely 0.95 ERA now reads 3.75, and the seven-run inning, biggest for Houston all year (heck, including today they've scored that many in an entire game only five times this season) pretty much ended the game.
Even when the Cubs attempted to get back into the game by getting the first two runners in scoring position -- that's right, second and third with nobody out -- in the sixth inning, the rest of the inning was oh-so-familiar; Neifi! popped out, Corey Patterson struck out swinging (where have we heard this song before?), and then Derrek Lee hit a fly to right; that would have scored a run if either of the previous two hitters had managed it.
But they didn't.
Or how about the ninth inning, game virtually over, the Cubs loaded the bases with nobody out, only to fail to score for the second time in the game with the bases loaded. That's an ugly thirteen men left on base this afternoon. Twelve hits and three walks ought to generate more than three runs, but today all they could manage was an unearned run scoring on an error, and a Derrek Lee two-run homer. Luckily, Lee hasn't noticed that it's not April any more -- SHHH! Don't tell him! -- and he's now leading the NL in homers with 8, and with 30 RBI in 24 games, he's on pace for 203 RBI (yeah, I know, that's not going to happen, not on this team, anyway).
The pitching rotation is apparently going to be shifted around for the Milwaukee series, due to Monday's day off and the uncertain status of Kerry Wood (well, officially it's uncertain, but I have a feeling that certainty is going to manifest itself in a trip for Kerry to the DL in the next couple of days).
Carlos Zambrano will take his regular turn on Tuesday. Greg Maddux will throw on normal rest on Wednesday (instead of five days' rest on Thursday), and Ryan Dempster will likely be the starter Thursday afternoon.
That leaves Wood's regular turn coming up on Friday at home against the Phillies, and I'd suspect that Glendon Rusch, who threw two innings and fifty pitches today, will take Wood's turn in the rotation, on four days' rest, and continue there for a while.
The Brewers, who are not a very good team either, ought to be a remedy for the Cubs' woes. But then, the Astros should have been that as well. A corner had better be turned, and soon.
Finally, during the game I happened to flip channels for a bit between innings, and landed on the Braves/Cardinals game on TBS.
Will someone please explain to me who decided that this:

would look good on a major league baseball player as a game jersey? I thought my TV color balance needed to be adjusted. The Braves looked like a bad beer-league team. They won wearing them 2-1, which will only encourage them to do it more often.
The good news is that win was over the Cardinals, keeping the Cubs 3 1/2 games out of first place.
I keep saying that on off days, the brass had better sit down and figure out where this team is going.
One of these off days, maybe they'll even do it.
19 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Dubois
Maybe...
The Jersey...
I was IMing with a friend during the last inning when Franco was brought in to face Burnitz and Hollandsworth. I said "bet you that there's no way that Baker pinch hits Dubois for Hollandsworth". Yeah, Garner may have gone to Lidge but you know that if the situation was reversed, Dubois would have been lifted for Hollandsworth, even if that meant that the opposing manager would have brought in a tough lefty reliever.
I want to know where the leadership of this team is. Seriously. I am getting so sick and tired of "Dude, I don't know, man, Woodys arm and tendonitis and man, jeez, it's just bad stuff and, dude, I don't know, we'll have to take a look at what it is and, jeez, I don't know, I'll have to sleep on it." For heavens sake, I want a fricking manager who knows. Would Bobby Cox ever day "Dude I don't know"? Would Torre, LaRussa, Pinella, Gardenhire or McKeon? Of course not. Next time he answers a question from a reporter "Dude, I don't know", maybe a reporter should ask him "do you think that it's time that the Cubs got a manager who knew?".
As I've asked before, where the heck is Hendry?
DmL
Dubois
You had me...
As for Sisco and Willis, I knew that the Cubs were giving up something in Willis but they got a closer and a starter. The closer, Alfonseca failed. Clement was great for them during his Cubs career and they may not have made the 2003 playoffs without him. As for Sisco, I believe that there is a lot we don't know. I've read elsewhere questions about his mental toughness as well as charges that he has certain similarities to Kyle Farnsworth when it comes to his after hours behavior. The Cubs rid themselves of those things on the major league roster so it's to be expected that they'd do the same with their minor leaguers.
DmL
Upon Further Review
By the way, I would appreciate a CLiff Notes version of how Rule 5 works? I know the selecting team has to keep the draftee on the big league roster, else they are returned to their original club, but beyond that, I don't understand how it works. IS any farmhand exposed to Rule 5, or do they have to be of a certian age of have a certain amount of minor league service?
My bottom line: If you need a Jose MAcias, you can always find one bumping around the waiver wire. Don't keep dead weight on the 40 man and lose promising young pitching!
Rule 5
Rule V Draft
Jose Macias has nothing to do with Andy Sisco. The Cubs could've cut Macias loose (which we all now feel would have been a good decision) but even if Macias was off of the roster, Sisco would not have been added in his place. Jim Hendry would have known that he was going to have Macias or someone else filling that role on the club eventually. As such, there needed to be a spot on the 40-man roster for that bench player. Had Sisco been put on the 40-man roster over Macias, once the Cubs figured out who was going to fill that utility role, Sisco or someone else would need to come off of the 40-man roster (and would then be available for every team to take since that player would have to clear waivers). Look at the Cubs 40-man roster right now. It's maxed out at 40 players. There would be no room on it for Sisco. Now people could say that perhaps Ronny Cedeno or John Koronka should have been exposed before Sisco.
As for the problems that Sisco has encountered, they are more of the use of illegal substance variety. As I've also stressed before, I think it's very telling about Sisco as a person that he didn't get his crap together until he was left unprotected in the Rule V Draft.
DmL
29 LOB!?!
What I want to know, is, what's up with Ramirez? He singlehandly left 5 on base this afternoon. He's batting .239 with 14 RBIs, compared to .306 and 22 RBIs last year after 24 games.
I guess he doesn't have to worry about his contract extension anymore.
Aramis is hurt
Al, how does one post a picture here?
Thanks!
Lisa
What is a Photobucket tag?
A Photobucket tag
Thanks for looking into it!
I checked the site...
As far as I can tell, what you could do is sign up for an account, upload your pics there and then post a URL here linking to those pictures.
Give it a try and let me know.
Beer League Jersey
Were they wearing white shoes with it? It is my understanding this type of thing MLB cooks up in order to give the fans more MLB apperal to dress up in. Imagine forking out 90 to 100 bucks for a game jersey like that.Speaking of prices I wonder how 'Dusty's Dugout Die' will be marketed?
Chalk up another vote for getting Dubois consistant playing time.
Finally the one who throws the 0-2 home run ball is most responsible for the mistake but isn't the catcher,pitching coach somehow responsible for pitch selection in those instances?
Hank 01
by hank01 on May 2, 2005 3:31 AM CDT reply actions
Stuff
DuBois probably should play more but he is a bit rough on defense.
Sico punched a wall or something in AAA and broke his hand. We don't need another head case. Besides,this is such a small sample and he's an unknown. Who knows what will happen when hitters see him again.
I;m not sure I'd know what to say or do about this team either. The starters have had injuries and/or ineffective, the middle infield>gone, the bullpen a reclamation project that has evolved into AAA, Maddux can't go beyond 80 pitches, nor Wood, Z blows up, Dempster throws a ton of pitches, the pen gets asked to do more than it can. Really, knowing from last year that Hawk couldn;t close, that Maddux couldn't go more than 5 or 6 innings, that you couldn't count on JoBo to return effective, that Dempster may or may not be effective, that Fox was not likely to escape injury, that Rem has missed time every year with problems, don't you think this pen should have been a priority over the winter?
I'm not a big Dusty fan for sure, but I have to tell ya, I wouldn't have any answers.
by alex on May 2, 2005 4:11 AM CDT reply actions
The spin on Dubois
Saturday's post-game show on Comcast spent several minutes stating, basically, that the only reason Dubois is doing so well is that Dusty is giving him every oportunity to succeed with favorable matchups. Sunday the newspapers say the same thing. Sunday evening Brenly says the same thing, again.
I think it's time that Chicago sports "journalists" try to get information from sources other than the team itself ... and not simply reiterate what other commentators have stated.
Wavin' Wendell Revisited????
by TX Cubfan on May 2, 2005 1:48 PM CDT reply actions

by 



















