Where Do I Begin?
I'll start here, because there were so many things wrong with today's 10-6 loss to the Brewers that I hardly know where to start.
It's the seventh inning. Damian Miller has just homered off Sergio Mitre to make the score 7-5, but that's still manageable on a day when the wind was whipping in our faces (officially 15 MPH, but gusting higher). There are two out. Geoff Jenkins doubles just out of Derrek Lee's reach, and the next hitter, J. J. Hardy, is hitting .180. Mitre gets two quick strikes on him.
You can guess what happens next, even if you don't already know. He threw Hardy "the Hawkins", and Hardy blooped an RBI double down the RF line.
But wait! It gets worse!
That was it for Mitre. Prince Fielder, the highly touted, left-handed-hitting, rookie son of former slugger Cecil Fielder, has already been announced as a pinch-hitter.
So what does Dusty do? Naturally, call on his trusted left-handed relief pitcher, Mike Remlinger.
What's wrong with this picture? All of you already know, but Dusty can't see it. Maybe Darren Baker was managing today, I dunno. Sure seemed like a six-year-old in charge. Remlinger's splits are even more absurd than usual coming into today's game -- a .333 BAA (average against) from left-handed hitters, .185 BAA from right-handed hitters, plus he had struck out twelve right-handers.
OK, strategy hounds, this still might work. First base was open, and the next hitter, Brady Clark, had been 0-for-4. So, Howard, Jeff and I are thinking -- walk Fielder, pitch to Clark, keep the game close.
BZZZZZZZ! Wrong! Fielder hits the first pitch up the middle for an RBI single. Naturally, Remlinger gets Clark to pop up in foul territory to Derrek Lee.
Why can't anyone see the reverse splits that all of us can see? Remlinger could be an effective reliever if he were used in the reverse-split manner. But Baker stubbornly continues to use him as a LOOGY, even though every single person who reads this blog, and in theory thousands of other Cub fans, know that it's going to blow up in his face every single time.
That wasn't even the worst thing Baker did today. I figured this morning that some right-handed hitters would get the start against Chris Capuano, and indeed, Jason Dubois and Jerry Hairston and Ronny Cedeno got starts. But Jose Macias in right field? When Jeromy Burnitz is hot and he's one of only two current Cubs who even had a hit off Capuano?
Then, after Capuano's taken out, Burnitz comes into the game when Aramis Ramirez leaves (hit by a pitch, didn't seem too serious, I suspect he just left as a precaution), and Jose Macias moves to 3B. This was at the same time as Mitre came in, so we all figured "double switch", since the pitcher's spot was due up next.
BZZZZZZZ! Wrong again! Burnitz goes into Ramirez' spot, so he only gets one at-bat. Neifi! wound up batting for Remlinger, and flying out on the first pitch.
Hairston, for his part, led off the game with a home run -- and then Corey Patterson walked for the third time in four games. But for Corey, that was it -- he went 0-for-4 in his remaining at-bats and looked bad doing it, particularly in the ninth after the Cubs had begun a too-little-too-late rally against reliever Tommy Phelps, scoring a run and forcing Ned Yost to call on his closer, Derrick Turnbow, in a non-save situation.
By then, Todd Walker had replaced Hairston, but he and Patterson must have had evening plans, because they both swung at the first pitch and grounded out harmlessly to end the game.
This was all after the Cubs had made a nice comeback from being down 5-1 (I told Howard, "Five runs won't win this game" after the Brewers had gone out to that lead, in part thanks to Corey missing the cutoff man and allowing Hardy to take an extra base after he had singled in a run), tying the game at 5 in the fourth. I'm going to take some credit here -- with two out and Ronny Cedeno on second, Greg Maddux hit a grounder to Bill Hall at 3B.
I yelled out, "Throw it away!" and that's exactly what Hall did, sending it to the dugout seats and allowing Cedeno to score the tying run.
But, Maddux didn't have it today and gave it all back in the next half-inning, throwing 88 pitches in five innings. Only one of the Brewers' three homers (Carlos Lee's 420-foot homer into the juniper bushes in the first) was off him, though.
Dedicated blog reader Paul from Ohio (he and Howard found out they have traversed the same ground often, as Howard's in-laws are from the same part of Ohio) and his girlfriend Isha (hope I remembered to spell that right!) joined us for this afternoon's game, and despite the loss they have been invited to return. A guy came up to Jeff and started talking and after they were done, I asked "Who was that?"
Turned out it was his nephew, of all people, and I gave a BCB card to a buddy of his named J. D., and Howard assured him there would definitely be a "J" and a "D" in today's post, so here they are:
J
D
It was warm today, but with the breeze relatively comfortable, but the young ushers with the spritz bottles returned. Again, Bill Our Favorite Security Guard kept them away from us and kept our scorecards dry. By the end of the game the ushers had given up on spritzing and just opened up the bottles and dumped the water on people who seemed to enjoy that sort of thing, though we sure wouldn't have.
Well, enough about today. It's only one loss, and keep in mind that you have only a little more than five hours to get Derrek Lee elected to start the All-Star Game (and frankly, Derrek's in a little down phase -- below .380 for the first time in a couple of weeks). To end this post, I thought I'd share this, sent to me today by e-mail from Dan Cusimano, an expatriate Cub fan living in the Washington, DC area, as a preview of this weekend's first-ever hosting at Wrigley Field of a team from Washington:
As the Nationals come into Chicago this weekend, I thought you might want a blurb or two on the first year team. I have season tickets at RFK Stadium, so see a lot of the Nats.
Let me start by saying I am TOTALLY in the tank for the Nats - they're one of the most appealing, fan-friendly, hard-nosed teams I've ever seen. They are, for the most part, the anti-Cubs. They do all the little things well - take pitches, play tough defense, take the extra base, and are (at this writing) so far over their collective heads their noses are bleeding. They're 46-31 with a negative run differential.
A lot of this is because of the amazing home field advantage the Nats have - as of today they're 27-10 at home - where everybody simply believes they're going to win the game. The team plays off of RFK's idiosyncracies - the field is HUGE and balls just die in the outfield, there's lots of foul territory and requires speedy defense. The Nationals pitching staff doesn't walk anybody, and just lets the defense catch the ball. Chad Cordero, the closer, is simply lights out, hitting 24 straight save chances, with most of them being very tough.
The Nats offense is anemic - they are light all over the place, and are hurt by injury everywhere. The best two players on the team are probably Jose Vidro, who has been out since mid-April, and Nick Johnson, who is out until the All-Star break. They're using Carlos Baerga a lot, and Wil Cordero, who, as of last night, was at .026 and dropping.
I don't think they're a playoff team, but we're 80 games in, and they're 15 games over. At some point, people have to stop saying its a fluke. The team they most remind me of is the 1989 Baltimore Orioles, the "Why Not" team, that went into the last day of the season with a chance to win the division after going 54-107 the year before. Both teams have one thing in common - Frank Robinson's the manager. Everybody always talks about how intangibles don't mean anything, but I think in the Nationals case, the fact that they're playing in front of 35,000 people who are totally head over heels in love with the team means something. The team has taken on the personality of Frank, who doesn't take any crap from ANYBODY - the whole Scioscia thing two weeks ago was typical - and they play hard all the time.
They're fun to watch. Have a good time this weekend.
This is cogent and to the point, but do keep in mind that home/road split (now 28-10 at home after their win today), but that also makes them 18-21 on the road. Winning two of three from them is imperative.
28 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
RE: I hate Dusty
by cdw070 on Jun 30, 2005 6:16 PM CDT up reply actions
I can't stand him
by Serena on Jun 30, 2005 7:06 PM CDT up reply actions
I agree!!!!!
Good god, Dusty need to wake up that this is not little league where if you don't play everybody, their feelings get hurt!!!
Maybe the guy in the booth should get a chance?!?!
by horp the reckless on Jun 30, 2005 6:17 PM CDT reply actions
Remlinger's splits
I have maintained all along (in other places on the web) that Dusty's #1 weakness as a manager is his totally inane and indefensible in game usage patterns.
This has been a problem his entire managerial career.
I acknowledged this acknowledgement
New lows
0-for-4 in three at-bats? That's a new low, even for Corey.
Johnnie B. empties the bullpen again
We all (except Dusty) know that Remlinger is the Supreme Anti-LOOGY!
But to manage differently would violate the sacred protocol of contemporary managers, that being that they must employ 5,6 or 7 pitchers every game.
Once again...the job of a major league manager is not to robotically conform to expected usage patterns that have become compulsory. Instead, it is to make strategic decisions which afford his team the best chance to win that particular game. Dusty consistently demonstrates that he does not understand this basic concept.
And another thing....
Remember the Titans
Lesson? Never underestimate a team coming out of those circumstances. The Nats have more or less replicated that chain of events and their home record should not be a surprise. Hopefully we can beat them as visitors. I for one am happy for the ne Expos as a sports fan.
That being said, let's pound them this weekend.
EH
by Slaky311 on Jun 30, 2005 8:56 PM CDT up reply actions
CTL
However, he said he might get traded away because Hendry and Dusty are dying more than ever to win this year, which I think might be true. They even mentioned something I hadnt even thought of but really scared me to death: if the cubs dont win they,Hendry, Dusty and all of us Cubs fans will die if we see a Cardinals-White Sox WS. That is something that I think should and maybe is motivating them to do better things. I would seriously be scared to death if I saw that. Someone said the Cubs would win in 95 games and I am hoping someone has said the future.
Hill
Hill on the other hand they need to check. It was mentioned earlier in the year that his abraisive style of pitching is going to get him hurt, while that may be that has not stopped him yet in posting a truly impressive ERA in AAA ball, and making a mark in the Majors. He's a southpaw pitcher (no they're not extinct yet) with promise. Though the kid may've gotten a little bit roughed up his first time seeing action the second time he threw 4.1 hitless innings striking out six and walking 2. Not bad for a Rookie that surged his way from AA to AAA to the Majors.
I'm not Hendry though, and if these 2 are bound for TB then I hope they can make a difference down there, those poor Devil Ray fans deserve more wins.
by priorpwnz on Jul 1, 2005 5:38 AM CDT reply actions
Cory
by jimhickman on Jul 1, 2005 7:45 AM CDT reply actions
Is it time for a "Phil Garner" shake-up?
Given the fact that dusty apparantly uses "the force" to manage -- and what did people a long time ago in a galaxy far far away no about baseball anyway -- instead of actual baseball knowledge I think it's time.
Also
In addition to the fact he abolutely KILLS the Cubs, he seems like the type of guy you want in the clubhouse.;
I couldn't agree more....
I think the Sosa circus put Hendry in a bind, which is why no deal like this was made.
What a shame
Looking at sosa's anemic numbers I've come to the conclusion that the trade would have been worth it if all we got in return was a bag of baseballs and a case of sunflower seeds.
by AlabamaCubFan on Jul 1, 2005 9:17 AM CDT up reply actions
This week's Sports Illustrated...
I suspect that, unless he has a monster second half, and that doesn't seem likely, his career will end at the end of 2005. He may not even make it to 600 HR.
Sosa in 2006?
Real shame too, as when he was playing with the team first attitude, i beleive that he was a better all-around player. Just my oppinion though.
by horp the reckless on Jul 1, 2005 9:53 AM CDT up reply actions
Sammy may WANT to play next year...
Check out this take on Sammy from my SportsBLOGS colleague Scott over at Camden Chat:
Yeah, I know, be patient. But Sosa is giving absolutely zero indication that this is merely a slump. This looks like the last sad year of a once-proud slugger. Most of them have it. If Sammy doesn't snap out of this in a big way - and to be honest I don't think he's going to - then I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if Sammy Sosa retired. Right now, it's gone from maddening to depressing.
Did any Cubs fans really expect Jeromy Burnitz to greatly outperform Sosa?
I can answer that. Yes, we did, and he has.
Not unless BALCO finds another cream
by AlabamaCubFan on Jul 1, 2005 10:13 AM CDT up reply actions
Can't tell you...
Sadly, Sosa will most likely limp his way out of baseball, DHing his way toward 600 from team to team until his body finally wears out. Not a bang, but a whimper...
by chmcneel on Jul 1, 2005 10:16 AM CDT reply actions

by 



















