Off-Day Notes
I have heard that...
because of the falling concrete and other structural problems that beset Wrigley Field last year, the Cubs have been requested, and have complied with said request, to sell fewer standing-room tickets this season.
This would explain why there have been only three announced crowds of over 40,000 this year, as compared to fourteen last year. In fact, looking at last year's game-by-game attendance record, there were no 40,000+ crowds in 2004 after game #49 -- the game of July 22, 2004, which was right around the time the falling-concrete story became public.
In connection with this, I have also heard rumors that eventually, the entire upper deck will have to be replaced as a result. This is actually a positive development -- it means that the Cubs have long-range plans to stay in Wrigley Field, and that in addition to the already-announced bleacher expansion proposal, that the Cubs could wind up adding more seats, skyboxes, etc. and stay in Wrigley Field for many years to come.
With a bit of a breather, I also wanted to give a couple of mini-reviews of two baseball/sports-related books I've read recently.
One of them you already know a bit about -- Rammer Jammer Yellow Hammer, about the lengths to which Alabama football fans go to follow their team, and which inspired me to write the "Why Are We Here" thread that's now on the right sidebar.
The title comes from, as the author explains, the title of a long-defunct 'Bama student publication ("Rammer Jammer") and the Alabama state bird.
Suffice to say this: it was well worth reading, because I recognized myself in so much of what Warren St. John wrote, and I think most of you will too. Being a fan of a team does, in fact, become in part, who you are, no matter whether it's Alabama football, or the Cubs. The feeling is universal, and St. John captures it well. The reason he does, of course, is that he's not just a New York writer doing this book -- he's doing the book because he grew up in Alabama loving the football team in the Bear Bryant era.
It chronicles one season -- the year is never identified, probably to make the book more timeless, but clues inside make it clear that it's the 1999 season. That's really not relevant, except for this fact -- I think any of us who are true fans of any sport, would try to figure this out, because... well, that's what we do. And that's kind of the point of the book.
Fun to read, great characters (you could NOT make these people up -- they have to be real!) and terrific stories. Highly recommended.
A couple of months ago, I also read Larceny & Old Leather, by Chicago-area attorney Eldon Ham. This book is kind of a wide-ranging summary of various types of "larceny", or cheating, in baseball history. It covers things like steroids, corked bats, spitballs, spying, betting, cheating of all kinds.
In trying to do all these things, I think the book bites off a little more than it can chew. I found it interesting, but a little unfocused, since it was trying to cover so many things. Ham is at his best when talking about the Pete Rose scandal. While I don't necessarily agree with his conclusions, it was the only part of the book where I felt Ham was putting passionate beliefs in something, rather than just reciting facts.
And that's another thing... the book could have stood proofreading and fact-checking. It was irritating to read, in the section on Sammy's corked-bat incident, that he had hit "twenty home runs in the first three weeks" of the 2003 season.
We could have only wished for that many!
Similarly, the book had Satchel Paige pitching for the "1965 Oakland Athletics" -- nope, they didn't move there from Kansas City till 1968 and has one-armed St. Louis Browns outfielder Pete Gray playing for the Browns in 1951, the same season the midget Eddie Gaedel batted for them (nope; Gray's one year for the Browns was 1945).
But these are nitpicks. Ham's book is well-written, and if you want a fun overview of what the cover calls the "mischievous legacy" of baseball, it's worth checking out.
Next on the reading list: Buzz Bissinger's "Three Nights In August", which is primarily focused on Cardinal manager Tony LaRussa's managerial ways, but is also of interest to Cub fans, because the "Three Nights" are the pennant-race-crucial series between the Cubs and Cardinals at Busch Stadium in late August, 2003.
And, for discussion of the Rafael Palmeiro steroid suspension, there's a diary on the right sidebar.
Enjoy the off day. Winning begins tomorrow.
41 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
That was leather larceny . . .
Three Nights in August
I did however find the JD Drew stuff kind of amusing.
Also..
I read Moneyball and I could see why it POed a lot of folks in the business. Even a neutral observer can see that the success of the Braves and the Twins shows that there are more ways to skin a cat than the approach used by the A's. But the main point in Moneyball; which is to use Stats as a means to hedge decision making needs to be appreciated. Especially after the success of the A's this year after the horrendous start.
by victor @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Aug 2, 2005 12:59 PM CDT up reply actions
Quote
The Cubs should be excited to play at Philadelphia. Their stadium is a homerun paradise.
I know this isn't like me...
Torii
Plus, rookie Zack Duke pitched into the ninth inning and earned his fourth victory in a Pittsburgh win over the hot Atlanta Braves. Gerut didn't debut for the Pirates.
Duke's ERA now stands at 0.92. Rookie of the year, anyone?
yeah
by mike bornemann @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Aug 1, 2005 4:21 PM CDT up reply actions
That's sad
Don't assume...
I'm not sure what the rules are regarding players on the 40-man roster who are on optional assignment to the minors, as Patterson is.
25-man roster players have to clear waivers. Anyone know the rules on this? And don't assume that he wouldn't.
clear waivers?
if he's somehow exempt from that, i guess we could still trade him. but it wouldn't make a lot of sense at this point, to me.
I agree
If they really wanted to get rid of him, he would have already been gone.
speaking of books...
Falling concrete
Everthing is falling apart since Dusty took over.
by jimhickman on Aug 1, 2005 5:40 PM CDT reply actions
i've got one!
the concrete...
This year, we got to sit in the dugout boxes near the visitors dugout. We were in there early, and I heard a sound like rocks hitting concrete. I looked and it was my kids (ages 4 & 5) "playing marbles." Except their marbles were chunks of old Wrigley Field concrete, roughly ranging in size from golf-ball to tennis ball. About 10 in all, unknown if they were off the upper deck or (more likely) remnants of the decaying lower deck.
We kept a big one as a souvenir, and gave the rest to a very surprised usher.
The Wrigley Field upper deck
That would also be as good a time as any to do the other projects around the ballpark that they've talked about doing: Expanding the bleachers; building the Cubs Museum / parking garage / team offices next door; constructing the promenade between the new building and the ballpark, etc.
by Gregory on Aug 1, 2005 11:29 PM CDT up reply actions
We discussed...
We figure it could be done in sections, and during off-seasons. Or, depending on how quickly they wanted to do it, maybe in one off-season.
Wrigley Field was built in a little less than two months in 1914.
U of I had to do it...
To re-do the whole Wrigley upper deck from November-mid April (assuming an extended road trip to start the season) seems like a lot to ask.
It could be...
Maybe half of it could be done at a time. I dunno. I doubt the Cubs would want to play at the Cell for a year.
It is going to happen sooner
Isn't the facade already designated as a landmark? If so, the cubs will have to gut the inside and rebuild the whole thing, not just the upper deck. My only hope is that if the facade has to be kept the design does not become like the Soldier field monstrosity.
by victor @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Aug 2, 2005 1:04 PM CDT up reply actions
In fact...
I also don't think replacing the upper deck would mean gutting the inside of the park. But it could mean more skyboxes, which is where bigtime revenue really originates.
I'd love to see those Addison concrete slabs go
by Gregory on Aug 3, 2005 12:40 AM CDT up reply actions
You're talking about...
But yes, that's a problem.
they could be creative
by Gregory on Aug 4, 2005 2:25 AM CDT up reply actions
Wrigley has a smaller capacity, but....
If they were going to shut Wrigley down for a season, they'd surely do a complete gut rehab job like Soldier Field. That was January - following October.
We'll see.
Pirate fans
There is some griping about the Pirates being the Cubs AAAA franchise, but not a lot. And unlike on the Reds boards, there doesn't seem to be a lot of anger against the Cubs--it's more directed towards Pirates management and ownership.
I don't know if Pirate fans are simply level-headed and rational or that they've just been beaten into a sense of learned helplessness. One suspects both.
Anyway, I hope Gerut does well for them (except against the Cubs, of course). Not only do I want Gerut to succeed for his own sake, but the Pirates getting something out of this deal might help ensure that they keep sending us players like Aramis and Lawton.
The Pirates...
Let's hope those games are meaningful ones.
Not necessarily....
i don't get it
by dc60123 @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Aug 1, 2005 8:46 PM CDT up reply actions
I also don't get it
Then again, perhaps it's a fan-invasion thing. I don't know how many Cards or Astros fans show up at the Great American Ballpark when their respective teams are in Cincinnati, but it's patently obvious that Cubs fans have been invading the GAB en masse in recent years. That's got to stick in the craw of Reds fans, who are a very proud bunch that take great pride in Cincy being a "baseball town".
by Gregory on Aug 1, 2005 11:34 PM CDT up reply actions
Red Reporter
hmm...
I never knew Hendry had that kind of pull, that's kind of interesting.
by priorpwnz on Aug 1, 2005 6:40 PM CDT reply actions
Question, Al.
Here's the deal...
Unlike other seats which used to be offered on a part-season basis (you can't get the partial packages any more, but those who had them were allowed to keep them), bleacher season tickets have always been full-season only.
There have been between 50 and 100 or so season-ticket holders in the 14 seasons they've had them -- it dropped off after the strike in 1994, went back up after 1998. This shouldn't surprise you.
They stopped offering new bleacher season tickets after 2003. I believe there are around 80-100 at this time. They have told us that we can keep our season tickets indefinitely, though there will be no new ones sold.
Patterson & Waivers
I though Korey
Options...
Corey had to clear waivers, because he HAS reached three full years of ML service. 2003 counts because he was on the major league DL.
Okay, I see
Anyway, I've been studying waivers since the beginning of the season. I should be an expert now, but they are just too fucking messy.
I believe
by Gregory on Aug 1, 2005 11:37 PM CDT up reply actions

by 



















