Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Win or Lose, Boston Celtics' New Big 3 Era A Success

Almost Famous

There comes a time in a nascent no-hitter or perfect game when, if you are watching, you say to yourself -- and ONLY to yourself, as you know -- "Hey, this just might happen."

And as last night's game went on and the Cubs kept tacking on a run here, a run there, and Glendon Rusch breezed through the Cardinals' order, with a couple of nifty defensive plays, oh, and with no walks to boot, about the fourth inning it got interesting to watch.

And after five, still no baserunners, it became a "thing that made me go 'hmmmmmm'", and after six, still without saying a word about what was going on, I said to Mark, who was just hanging around playing before going to bed, "Wanna go watch? It's going into the last of the seventh," he knowing as well as I that you don't ever ever ever say what "it" is, in such situations.

Well, that didn't last too long. That darned pest David Eckstein led off the last of the seventh with a clean single up the middle that seemed to bounce about fifty times, and that was that.

He was erased on a double play, and so Rusch faced the minimum 21 batters through seven innings, and so I'm thinking it could have been the Cubs' fourth one-hitter of the season.

But Rusch ran out of gas in the eighth, and even though it was his best-pitched game (and first victory) since his shutout of the Padres in San Diego on June 2, he had to settle for allowing the bullpen to finish up the no-less-satisfying 5-2 win over the Cardinals, which clinches the Cubs' first non-losing season in St. Louis since 1995 (they are 4-3 in Busch Stadium's last season with one final game there tonight).

The Cubs teed off on Matt Morris early and often; Jerry Hairston led off the game with a double and by the time the first inning was over, the Cubs had scored twice; in the third Derrek Lee hit his fortieth home run of the season (on his thirtieth birthday, a neat bit of numerical symmetry, and the third straight year he's homered on his birthday).

That made him the ninth Cub to hit that many in one season (Hack Wilson, Hank Sauer, Ernie Banks, Billy Williams, Dave Kingman, Andre Dawson, Ryne Sandberg and Sammy Sosa are the other eight, and yes, I knew you'd ask), and with 97 RBI he's one short of his career high, set last year. There'll likely be no Triple Crown, and thus no MVP, but Lee has not only had the season of his life, I'd argue that he's had one of the top ten greatest offensive seasons in Cubs history.

Corey Patterson homered. This isn't necessarily a good thing, because usually that's an accident, and it'll make him start swinging from the heels for the next couple of weeks. He also drew his twentieth walk of the year (against a ghastly 102 strikeouts). All this means is less playing time for Matt Murton. However, with Mark Mulder going tonight, Murton ought to get the start against the lefthander.

Neifi Perez had three hits. So what? Why is he playing ahead of Ronny Cedeno?

I'd say both of these guys should get extended playing time this weekend in San Francisco, but in the bizarro world that is this year's NL West, the Giants, who are eleven games under .500, are only five games out of first place. Maybe Dusty will see their 63-74 record and not notice their second-place standing. It's time to start playing guys who are the future. Yes, Neifi has done a good job this year (and his average is up to .286), and will likely return as a backup infielder in 2006, but we already know what Neifi can do, Dusty.

Time to play the kids. Time to play the kids. Time to play the kids. Time to play the kids.

And time for Corey Patterson to go, despite the walk and the homer last night. In today's Tribune, Rick Morrissey cogently sums up the reasons the Cubs ought to dump Patterson at any price, calling him "clueless".

Well said. I hope Jim Hendry is listening.

Finally, give congrats to Dave's Rockford Riverhawks, who made the Frontier League playoffs for the third consecutive year and will begin their first-round playoff series vs. Kalamazoo tonight on the road. If you're near Rockford, consider taking in game three of the best-of-five series on Friday night at 7:05. The price is right, too: box seats are $10, every other seat in the house is $5.

Comment 24 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I'm back and man the mood
here in philly is pretty depressing.  People are already counting them out and maybe the odds are against the Phils.

All i am hoping is that it isn't the Astros, hopefully we can play the spoiler, what do we have like 7 games left, that would be wonderful to knock the smirk off Roy Oswalt's face and to send Roger into retirement(crossing my fingers about the retirement thing), at least can I hope that the Astros don't make the playoffs.

"You know what God told the cubs. Don't do anything until I get back!" Pete Rose

by Will71081 @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Sep 7, 2005 8:59 AM CDT reply actions  

I have said...
... for the last month or so, that I felt the best team in the wild-card race was the Marlins. I still feel that way, and somehow, I think they'll find a way to take it.

The Marlins could be a VERY dangerous team in the playoffs, if they can make it there.

by Al Yellon on Sep 7, 2005 9:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

Give Santo an assist
Before Eckstein's ground ball single, Santo mentioned twice in 5 seconds the magic "no hitter" word. As soon as the second "no hitter" left his lips, Eckstein hits the ball straight up the middle. Thanks Ronny (for nothing), I figured you'd know better.

It was a well pitched ball game by Rusch, which was encouraging in a too little too late kind of way.

If the Cubs could get out of an inning by taking less than 3 pitches, they would.

by CherryPoppinCubbies on Sep 7, 2005 11:02 AM CDT reply actions  

The superstition is...
...you don't talk about it IN THE DUGOUT!!!

You want to follow it elsewhere, fine.  But don't blame Santo.  This was one of the few times this season he said something correctly.

by Ivychat on Sep 7, 2005 11:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

Chuck...
seriously, do you have to criticize absolutely everything?

If those of us who watch the game, either the broadcasters at the park, or those of us watching or listening at home, want to keep this superstition for ourselves, who are you to say we can't?

by Al Yellon on Sep 7, 2005 1:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

Jeez..
Reading is a skill, Al.

If you re-read what I wrote, I said that: A) go ahead and do whatever you want; and B) Santo wasn't violating a superstition.

I was DEFENDING Santo FROM criticism.

Sheesh....

by Ivychat on Sep 7, 2005 2:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

I do see what you mean...
... but typically, broadcasters DO follow this superstition, and as a former player, Santo ought to know this better than most.

by Al Yellon on Sep 7, 2005 2:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

As a former player...
...Santo WAS following the superstition!

He wasn't in the dugout!

by Ivychat on Sep 7, 2005 3:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

My point was...
... that as a former player, Santo should have followed the superstition regardless of where he was.

In any case, it is only a superstition. But that's part of what makes baseball fun.

I'm sure you can agree with me on that, at least.

by Al Yellon on Sep 7, 2005 4:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yes
That makes baseball fun.  But I fail to see how Santo should have followed the superstition regardless of where he was when the superstition is about a specific location.

Wouldn't TALKING about it on the air BE following the superstition?

by Ivychat on Sep 7, 2005 4:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

No, it's the reverse...
... following the superstition would, to me, mean NOT mentioning it on the air.

JMHO.

by Al Yellon on Sep 7, 2005 4:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

It would
were he broadcasting from the dugout.

by Ivychat on Sep 7, 2005 4:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

I give up...
... I don't think we're understanding each other here.

by Al Yellon on Sep 7, 2005 5:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

I thought it was funny that
Len wouldn't say it but they were trying their hardest to make sure the viewer knew what was going on.  He kept saying Glendon hasn't had to pitch from the stretch and they were putting up the Runs Hits Errors to finish and start every inning.  It made it fun as long as you knew there was a perfect game going and about the superstition.  

As far as Santo and radio goes though I think it becomes very difficult to broadcast the game without explaining what is going on.  I think TV and radio both did it exactly how I would like it to be handled personally.  But in radio you can't put graphics up on screen.  You have to tell the listener what is going on.  

by JonH on Sep 7, 2005 1:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

When I tuned in...
Pat Hughes had just mentioned that Glendon hadn't allowed a single baserunner yet. There are several ways to imply that there's a no-no going on without saying [paraphrasing here]"lets see if he can't keep this no hitter going." Obviously Ronnie let his enthusiasm get the better of him, which is typical Santo and I like him for it, but I'd think he'd know better than to say "no hitter" during a no hitter.
If the Cubs could get out of an inning by taking less than 3 pitches, they would.

by CherryPoppinCubbies on Sep 7, 2005 1:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

let me help you two
The traditional jinx is saying it in the dugout, al thinks saying at all is.  Santo said it out of the dugout so traditionally isn't jinxing it.  The jinx comes from ballpalyers, easily explaining why its traditionally not to be said in the dugout.  Ballplayers don't care what we say at home.

by mike bornemann @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Sep 7, 2005 5:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah
That's what I've been sayin'.

by Ivychat on Sep 7, 2005 11:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Definition of a .500 ballclub
That was quite a game to watch, for sure.  I don't think I've been in to a game like I was last night since like June.  Great stuff - -

I just saw a telling stat that describes how teh Cubbies have become a definitive .500 ballclub:

623 Runs scored, 623 Runs against.

Amazing.  Here's to 2006!  Play the kids!

by ar_hawkins on Sep 7, 2005 11:02 AM CDT reply actions  

I take the blame...
...for Glendon losing the no-hitter.  I was watching the game live until I got a call from my significant other and paused the game on my Tivo.  The moment I resumed the game, the very NEXT PITCH in fact, Eckstein got his single up the middle.

Had I been watching the game live, I'm certain that never would have happened.

by andyrut on Sep 7, 2005 11:03 AM CDT reply actions  

Actually it was 22 batters in the 1st 7 innings
because with 2 outs, Pujols walked.  The next batter, Molina made the 3rd out in the 7th.

by kaseyi on Sep 7, 2005 12:56 PM CDT reply actions  

Neifi as back-up
Al, you say that "Neifi will likely return as a backup infielder in 2006". That would be wonderful if he did, but I'd be afraid he wouldn't be used as a back-up.

Look at his splits of 2005 by month, and it's blindingly obvious that when he plays part-time (April, August and September), he is very good at the plate, but NOT when he is in there every day over the course of a month (i.e. May, June and July).

I have a weird feeling they'll bring back all three shortstops.

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlbpa/players/5702/splits

by JohnM on Sep 7, 2005 2:14 PM CDT reply actions  

Hendry....
... can take care of this by signing Nomar as a left fielder, and insisting that Cedeno make the team as the starting SS.

by Al Yellon on Sep 8, 2005 8:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Maybe it's time to take a deep breath

Recent FanPosts

Zambrano_background_2_small
What is the most likely move in June regarding current players?
Small
Draft Prep: Pierce Johnson
Small
Trying to be positive (need some help)
Small
Soriano back to Second?
Small
Javier Baez Peoria Bound?
Small
Draft Prep: Conference Tournament Version
Despite-an-inflated-babip-lahair-is-no-one-month-wonder
Suddenly, I feel your pain
Small
Start of the LaHair Regression?
Dsc06783_small
Rookie Season Ticket Open House

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Doug Glanville On His Teammate, Kerry Wood
Thanks.
Samardzija takes a dig at Hawk Harrelson
Chicago vs. Chicago, Round 2.
Wrigley Field Photo Gallery

Recent FanShots

Wrigley Field Supporters Propose Tearing Down Rest Of Chicago
2012 Stars and Stripes Hat
Sveum moves Castro back to #2 spot
OT: Tyler Colvin bats 2nd
The Pittsburgh Pirates Offensive Catastrophe
Roy Halladay Bobblehead Fail
Full sized image
All The Topps Baseball Card Cubs, 1951 - 2012
Rob Neyer answers the question: When should the Cubs call up Anthony Rizzo?
Don't Have MLB Network? You Might Get Shut Out Of A Playoff Telecast

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Featured Poll

Poll
Should the National League adopt the designated hitter rule?

  963 votes | Results

Cubs By The Numbers

Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.

Click here to order your copy, available now!

Recent Stories in Chicago Cubs Game Threads

Yahoo_full_count

Recent Stories in Ticket Exchanges


Managing Editor

Alyellontoppscard_small Al Yellon

Front Page Contributors

Profile_small Josh Timmers

B_w_avatar_small Brett Taylor

Marvin_the_martian_small Shawn Domagal-Goldman

Other Contributors

Toonmike_small Mike Bojanowski

Dsc_0139_small David Sameshima