Bleed Cubbie Blue: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Sounder At Heart for Seattle Sounders Fans!

Ding, Dong

As reported in this diary, Corey Patterson is now a Baltimore Oriole.

Here's the official press release from the Orioles.

The Cubs receive Nate Spears, a 20-year-old SS who played last year in the Carolina League, and Carlos Perez, a 23-year-old lefthanded starting pitcher who was in the South Atlantic League in 2005.

It's over.

And it's sad, really: that someone with the athletic gifts -- the "tools" we always heard about, but rarely saw -- of Corey Patterson, simply didn't have the head, or the heart, to make it as a major league player.

Good luck to him. Seriously. I don't wish him ill.

I'm just glad he's not a Cub any more.

0 recs  |  Comment 165 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

agreed
He didn't seem like a bad guy. Stubborn? yes. That being said, it had turned into a bad situation for him here. Hopefully things turn out better for him elsewhere.
AC 00 00 00 - BELIEVE

by mike on Jan 9, 2006 2:49 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

those
weren't the two names i heard mentioned. they are, however, pretty uninspiring. the shortstop seems to strike out about as much as corey.
blah.

by tomas21 on Jan 9, 2006 2:50 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

But...
... that SS is only 20 years old, and at least has a chance to get better.

Further, no mention was made of any money the Cubs are paying; so whatever Corey makes in 2006, it's all Baltimore's responsibility.

by Al on Jan 9, 2006 2:54 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

agreed, mr. al
Spears don't have what you'd call a ton of upside, but he did post pretty good numbers as a 20-year-old in the Carolina League; 80-something K's in 450-ish ABs is hardly Luis Montanez territory, and he was pushing 40 walks as well.

I'm not crazy about this deal, but it's far too early to write it off completely, IMO.

by dustyisdonnie on Jan 9, 2006 3:10 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Patterson
Yes, he's gone, and yes, he had to go as he could not possibly do anything as a Cub anymore, but I will always remember the Home Run he hit last year when I was in the bleachers that went totally out of the park and hit the cab on the street.  Good luck Corey..hope you turn it around in the AL.

Kasey

by kaseyi on Jan 9, 2006 2:50 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Is that all?
I still stand by my post from last week that states I would rather have him rot on the bench and be used for pinch running, defensive replacements and spot starts than get rid of him when he is at his all time low trading value.

I don't care that it frees up 2.5 million. There is no salary cap.  It doesn't automatically translate into acquring someone because there is room on the payroll.  

I'm not upset about losing Patterson I am just upset that there seems to be a lack of a plan.  What kind of roster is being put together?  High slugging? No.  High OBP? No.  This reeks of Tribco cutting costs.  

 (reposted from the diary section)

by SonnyJ9 on Jan 9, 2006 2:54 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

You can't use up a roster spot for that...
... when Baker insists on a 12-man pitching staff. There is no "rot on the bench" spot available.

by Al on Jan 9, 2006 2:55 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Actually Al..
Almost every team uses 12 pitchers nowadays, especially early, but most of them throughout the year.  And with our fragile pitchers, we need to carry 12.

by mannytrillo on Jan 9, 2006 4:44 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

fragile, like Chad Fox-fragile?
Not sure that I agree with 'needing' to carry 12 pitchers...it's odd that Dusty rides his starters relatively hard but has no problem with only letting his relievers throw to one batter.  I don't have any hard evidence to back this up, but anecdotally it seems that it would put no more wear on a pitcher to have him throw one or two innings every other day than to have him in for a Assenmacheresque four-pitch outing.

by dustyisdonnie on Jan 9, 2006 4:58 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I disagree...
... and have often written about this. The 12th pitcher usually rots in the bullpen for 10 days or so, then has to come in in a critical situation, and gets pounded.

It's just silly. It cuts down the bench options. There really isn't enough work for 12 pitchers, particularly in April with multiple off days.

by Al on Jan 9, 2006 5:01 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Can't say I agree...
but that other bench player would be Jose Macias. So you can have 12 pitchers or Macias?  Let the pitcher rot...

by mannytrillo on Jan 9, 2006 7:15 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

No, it wouldn't be Macias....
.. because Macias was on the roster EVEN WITH TWELVE PITCHERS, which reduced the usable bench to three players (because one of your bench players was your backup catcher).

by Al on Jan 9, 2006 7:26 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

roster
Baker also ends up wasting players by misusing the double switch. He'll bring in a reliever and sub out a fielder to flop the lineup, then he'll pull the reliever before the No. 9 spot comes to the plate. If he'd intended to yank the reliever anyway, he could've just waited and pinch hit the No. 9 spot. In fairness, a lot of N.L. managers do this; it's not just Baker.

by Seamer on Jan 9, 2006 11:36 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Corey had to go
like Hawkins had to go last year. These guys, for whatever reason, could not contribute to the team anymore.  I liked Corey as a person but as a professional baseball player I am relieved he is now playing in the American League East.

by JFCubFan on Jan 9, 2006 3:34 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Cutting costs???????????

Cutting Costs????????
I've stayed away from the Patterson debate because I honestly didn't know what to think about it.

On the one hand, he may have been able to add something to the team in 2006, even if it were in a bench role...

...but...

on the other hand, the relationship between Corey and the organization, the coaches, and the fans had gotten to the point that I saw absolutely no way he could be successful in a Cubs uniform.  

However...

One thing I can definitely say is that the Cubs trading Patterson wasn NOT about saving money...it was about getting rid of Corey Patterson.  

by Santos L Halper on Jan 9, 2006 3:57 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Corey
Well, if Patterson is going to go somewhere and hit 30 HRs, get on base and steal a lot of bases, Baltimore isn't bad. He won't be doing it against the Cubs. Further he likely won't be doing it for a team headed anywhere.

As I said in my diary, if Patterson was to be dealt, I'm glad that basically it was trading potential for potential. Landing mediocre major leaguers is not worth it. I would have rather he stuck around and try to figure things out here. I'm not sure what Perez and Spears will bring and I'm looking forward to seeing Baseball America's opinion on the trade, however a quick glance at BA's top ten O's prospects  does not show either of these kids being in their top ten nor does it list either of them in the "best tools" section:
http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/features/05top10s/orioles.html

If Patterson fails in Baltimore, look for him to become the next Jose Cruz, a former top propsect with great tools, bouncing from team to team as a fourth outfielder.

DmL

by dmlichte on Jan 9, 2006 2:56 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Good luck Corey
I honestly mean that.  For as long as I can remember (which is at least since he was drafted coming out of high school), we've heard about his five tools and how he was such a great prospect.  Unfortunately, it didn't quite work out, but hopefully for him Baltimore will be a better situation.  At least he didn't get traded within the division if he turns out to be Lou Brock Part II (that's a long shot, I know).

At least we'll always have his 17th inning homer in Milwaukee to sweep the Brewers in May 2003.

by gauchodirk on Jan 9, 2006 2:59 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Trade
this trade dissapoints me.. I would rather have patterson rounding out the end of a bench than Augie Ojeda Michael Restovich or Marquis Grissom... the fact that we got absolutely nothing for Patterson saddens and frustrates me... the Minor leaguers they got are fringe minor leaguers with no real chance of being anywhere near the big leagues in the next year or two.  Neither are in Baltimore's top 10 according to any website.  One guy is a 23 year old class a player... way too old for class a... and the other is a 20 year old SS .. bum... thats what he is..

by cubsfan2883 on Jan 9, 2006 3:20 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

While this deal...............
..........disappoints me too, perhaps we all have to come to grips with just how far Corey Patterson has fallen in the eyes of the guys who are identifying talent.

Hendry was unable to create an environment of value in Patterson, and recognizing Corey could not remain with the club, he accepted the best of the anemic offers available.

by tville on Jan 9, 2006 3:25 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Best of Available Offers? Are You Kidding?
You make it sound like a virtuous move on the Cubs part.  To me, this looks like the latest in a long line of crappy-ass trades by the Cubs after they realize a player has no value to them.  Problem is, every team realizes it, too, so they get crap in return.

If the Cubs were really pragnatic, they would float Derrek Lee for Miguel Tejada, straight up.  Lee is good, but there's no way he replicates last year, because at age 29 it's way outside his expected production.  He's not Albert Pujols in the long term, aftr all -- he's a .275/.350/.490 guy which, while good, is not as irreplaceable as the same numbers at shortstop.

Chuck

by chasfh on Jan 10, 2006 8:05 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Get this
man some help PLZ!!!!! D-Lee for tejada what? come on!!!

by jfkjunior2004 on Jan 10, 2006 8:52 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Why Not?
Do you have a better reason than just "come on!!!"?

Chuck

by chasfh on Jan 10, 2006 9:03 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

i agree
that's a trade i'd do in a minute. all respect to lee, but this is his free agent year and the cubs very well may not resign him. tejada has four years left. power-hitting first basemen are a LOT easier to find than a player like tejada.

problem is, lee couldn't get you tejada -- because everyone else knows what i just said.

by gaius marius on Jan 10, 2006 10:16 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Corner infielders
You are absolutely correct.  There has been all kinds of productive first basemen and third basemen available as of late.  A stud shortstop is not as easy to get ahold of and Tejada is locked up for 4 more years.

by greggie44 on Jan 10, 2006 11:50 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

The White Sux............
.........traded their CF for the Phils 1B.  Why didn't we think of that?!?!

by tville on Jan 10, 2006 2:35 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Do you have.............
.........the terms of the BETTER OFFERS made to Hendry in exchange for Patterson?

If not, then I think you've overstated your position.

Further down in this post there is mention of Ryan Drese as part of a supposed deal with the Nats.  If true, it was a mistake not to snap him up, but unless there's something of substance to these rumors, I find it hard to understand how/why this was a "crappy-assed" trade.

by tville on Jan 10, 2006 11:09 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

That Wasn't My Point.
I could have stated this more clearly, I concede -- but my real point was not that they could have done better on a Corey Patterson trade a couple of days ago, because they couldn't.

My point was supposed to be that they waited too long before they decided Corey wasn't going to be what they thought he would be when they drafted him -- which was something Cubs management would have seen at any number of points in 2004, had they'd been bothered to pull their heads our of their asses.  

They waited until all the value drained from him because they decided they absolutely had to dump him -- not unlike Juan Cruz, Kyle Farnsworth and Sammy Sosa.

That's why I'm saying: now's the time to trade Derrek Lee.  He is never going to be more valuable in trade than he is right now, because you will replace his projected level of performance far more easily at 1B than at SS with Tejada.

Of course, the Cubs won't do so -- not only because they believe Lee will replicate his 2005 (I'll go on record right now as saying he will not come very close to doing so), but because they will have a minor riot on their hands with their fans.  You can say what you want about the Tribune, but they're no dummies.  They understand what fans want to see, because it's the business they're in, and if what they do in response to that helps the ballclub win -- well, more power to them.

Chuck

by chasfh on Jan 11, 2006 1:10 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Hold on now
We're calling a 20-year-old shortstop who hit .294 in high-A a bum?  Give the kid a break.  The Cubs can put him in West Tennessee next year and see how he does.  Not every major leaguer lit it up in the minors, so let's not jump to conclusions about a guy who is more than holding his own thus far.

by gauchodirk on Jan 9, 2006 3:29 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly.......
the guys that they got for Corey are garbage! There is no way that we can start this season with Grissom as the 4th outfielder.  What if Murton has a sophmore slump?   Ridiculous!!!!!!!!

by Trumac on Jan 9, 2006 3:50 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Grissom...
... isn't the fourth outfielder. John Mabry and Jerry Hairston come before him; Grissom will likely not even make the team.

by Al on Jan 9, 2006 4:18 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Doesn't matter.....
Its not like Mabry or Hairston are any better.  What happens if someone gets hurt, than one of those guys plays everyday?  Gonna be a long year, if Hendry doesnt make some sort of move!

by Trumac on Jan 10, 2006 8:06 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You cannot...
... go into a year expecting injury. Yes, one of those guys would have to play. But you'd also think, that if, for example, Jacque Jones got hurt, that Hendry would go out and try to acquire someone, much as he got Kenny Lofton in 2003 when Patterson got hurt.

Comparison: If the White Sox lost Jermaine Dye to injury, then Timo Perez would have to play RF for a time. Would that be good for them? No, it surely would not.

by Al on Jan 10, 2006 8:56 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

There are a few...
exceptions to your theory. A player that seems to have injuries year after year, Nomar is a real good example of this. If you have Nomar as your starting shortstop you must have a real solid backup who is able to fill in for twenty or thirty games a year. I don't think anybody in the Cubs outfield fits this description.  

by Imtrejo on Jan 10, 2006 9:28 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe not injury prone, but.....
Matt Murton may slump and Jones just might suck.  We dont know on either, but I would love to have some sort of insurance policy to bakc them up if they do.  Plus does that mean that when we play the AL that Mabry is the DH?  Wow, that thought just made me throw up on myself.

by Trumac on Jan 10, 2006 10:03 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Timo Perez is better.......
Than our back-up outfielders.  My point was I would rather have Corey on the bench just in case, than 2 guys who will never wear the major league Cubs uniform. A $100M payroll team should have a better 4th outfielder than Mabry.  If we trade Todd Walker, than Hairston will be the back-up 2nd baseman.  Than what?  I highly doubt the Cubs brass would bring Pie up!

by Trumac on Jan 10, 2006 10:01 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

On what planet...
... is Timo Perez better than Hairston or Mabry?

Wow, White Sox fans would think you are nuts.

by Al on Jan 10, 2006 10:21 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

if the cubs haven't
You cannot go into a year expecting injury.

it goes along way toward explaining why they haven't won anything recently.

this is just a false statement, imo. you absolutely can and should expect one of your star players to get knocked out on opening day. you can't have their equivalent on the bench, but you sure as hell can have a viable alternative.

i agree that even good teams do not always have the perfect alternative waiting on the bench. but virtually all of them can replace at least two good position players with major-league-caliber substitutes.

i think the cubs did a good job with mabry in this respect, and hairston should be someone's starting second baseman. it's better now than when they had macias running out there. patterson, fwiw, would be just as awful coming off the bench -- so glad he's not our problem anymore.

by gaius marius on Jan 10, 2006 10:27 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Neifi...
... is also a decent BACKUP player.

I still cringe at the thought that he will be the starting 2B. Todd Walker is a far better option, even if his defense is worse, and I think that is more perception than reality.

Perhaps I wasn't clear. While you shouldn't expect injury, yes, you should prepare for it, because it is part of the game. Walker, for example, went down in game #5 last year, and Nomar was gone after 15 games. And while the Cubs might have been able to weather the loss of one of those, losing two was virtually impossible to handle, as losing your starting DP combination would likely be for just about any team.

by Al on Jan 10, 2006 10:30 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree Neifi is...
a solid backup. I wouldn't mind seeing him get 200-300 AB, he came up with a few clutch hits last year and he plays solid defense. He can not be an everyday player, that would be a failure on Hendry's part.

by Imtrejo on Jan 10, 2006 10:50 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

i would even contest that much
depending on what you mean by "backup". is he a viable late-inning defensive substitution? sure. a pinch-hitter when you need a bunt? sure.

can he step in when your shortstop goes down for three months and sustain some level of productive offense? not hardly.

if aramis goes out, mabry can step in and hit 270/330/450. neifi can't. big difference.

and this team nonetheless seems intent to play him every day. and across the bag from a kid who has never really played in the majors.... who's playing in front of a kid with a grand total of 140 big-league at-bats.... gonna be a lean year, imo.

by gaius marius on Jan 10, 2006 11:25 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

When you trade garbage...
you get garbage. Hendry got what he could. Patterson is not worth what he was 3-4 years back. He's damaged goods.

by ccd on Jan 9, 2006 7:27 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

exactly
he got exactly what patterson was worth. i'll be surprised if we don't find cash was included, fwiw, to defray patterson's contract.

by gaius marius on Jan 10, 2006 10:28 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I won't.
If there had been cash included, it would have been announced as such in the press release.

by Al on Jan 10, 2006 10:30 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

players
Perez is a LOOGY down the road at best. Spears was in high A at age 20 and did well. He doesnt have great tools and could be a David Eckstein player down the road, at best.

by Ienpw on Jan 9, 2006 3:26 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

who pays for who's plane tickets?
beause if we paid for pattersons cool, but if we had to pay for those two then I am against this trade.  Too costly.

by mike bornemann on Jan 9, 2006 3:29 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

I dunno if I am allowed to quote something...
...from Baseball America, but in the O's Top 10 chat, this is what Will Lingo had to say about Spears.

Q: Joe from Long Beach, CA asks:
Happy New Year, Will! How does Nate Spears project? His numbers look a bit better than Brian Roberts' early minor league totals...any chance he develops the same power that Roberts did in 2005?

A:
Will Lingo: Happy New Year to you too, Joe. That's an interesting comparison between Spears and Roberts. I went back and looked at our report on Roberts when he was No. 10 on the Orioles list before the 2001 season, and here's what it says: "His tools aren't overwhelming, but the package is greater than the sum of its parts." That's a lot like what we say about Nate Spears now, though Roberts' tools back then probably graded a shade ahead of Spears' across the board. The Orioles prospect list is also stouter now than it was then. But if you're asking me to guess, then no, I don't think Spears will develop power and I think he'll be a utility guy.

If I am not allowed to post it, Al simply delete it.

by Ienpw on Jan 9, 2006 3:35 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

A real shame
I always had a soft spot for Corey mostly from  being
at his AMAZING Opening Day in New  York in 2003
and his tragic injury in June of that year incured while
DESPERATELY trying to beat out an infield hit in a game
in which the Cubs had I think 2 baserunners through
7. However what finally tore it for me was when
he refused to see a sports psychologist or play
in Winter League. If he had done either than I would
have given him credit for trying and realizing there
was a problem. I still think he has a lot of talent
and wish him well

by jessica on Jan 9, 2006 3:45 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Bye Bye K-orey
The only person who should be considered a bum in this trade is Patterson.  He's proven that he doesn't have the heart or discipline to play at the MLB level.  Any notion of using him at a platoon OF or as the last bench spot doesn't make sense.  He can't hit, he's never taken good angles in the outfield, and despite his speed, he's suprisingly ineffective on the bases.  In the end, us Cubs fans tend to look through blue colored glasses when evaluating a player like him, seeing more talent/potential than is really there.  Frankly, I'm suprised we were got so much.  A 20-year old SS who almost hit .300 sounds pretty solid to me.  That pitcher seems like dead weight, but as long as we were able to dump CP and his contract, I'm a happy camper.

by awesomedawson on Jan 9, 2006 3:48 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Wrong about something
He has great discipline -- while on the basepaths. 86 SB 23 CS is as good as it gets.
According to the Chicago Tribune: "The Oakland A's are 32-0 when they have scored more runs than their opponents.

by Carlos on Jan 9, 2006 4:05 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Except for...
... all the stupid pickoffs last year. The numbers don't tell the tale. Corey really has no idea HOW to run the bases -- he's just fast.

That's not enough.

by Al on Jan 9, 2006 4:18 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

2005
That's the only year I've seen him get picked off often. Maybe that happened because he failed at pretty much every other thing last year -- MLB-wise.
According to the Chicago Tribune: "The Oakland A's are 32-0 when they have scored more runs than their opponents.

by Carlos on Jan 9, 2006 5:03 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Fair
Point well taken.  However, those numbers aren't THAT much better than Hairston or D Lee, neither are exactly Ricky Henderson.  My point was more about poor baserunning outside of just stealing bases.  Although you could argue that's more Dusty's fault since the whole team runs the bases poorly.

by awesomedawson on Jan 9, 2006 4:25 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

at any rate...
...you can't steal first.  Except maybe for a little-known loophole in the rules -- if you don't swing at four pitches outside of the strike zone in any given at-bat, you get a 'walk.'  Has Dusty been informed?  I think this is something new...

by dustyisdonnie on Jan 9, 2006 5:00 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

That's one of the best sayings in
Baseball -- and I agree with you. Though, I was only referring to his speed once on base.
According to the Chicago Tribune: "The Oakland A's are 32-0 when they have scored more runs than their opponents.

by Carlos on Jan 9, 2006 5:05 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Actually...
over at TCR they did a study and it shows players walk MORE when playing for Dusty than playing for other managers.  Now you can say it has nothing to do with Dusty, and that is your choice, but the facts remain they walk more under him.

Here is the study:
http://www.all-baseball.com/cubreporter/archives/018087.html

This myth that Baker doesn't like his players to walk is just another inaccurate myth brought up against him.

by mannytrillo on Jan 9, 2006 7:19 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

The bonds factor
I wonder what those numbers would look like if you took out Bonds and his incredible (steroid induced) transformation.  His walk rate was EXCEPTIONALLY better than early in his career.

by CA Cub Fan on Jan 9, 2006 7:56 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

If you actually looked at the link...
you would see they broke it down with and without Bonds.

by mannytrillo on Jan 9, 2006 8:31 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

well, maybe he should talk a better game, then
I wasn't trying to single out Dusty as much as the Cubs' organizational hatred for the walk by that comment, though that's the way that it probably read.  I've always been frustrated by the fact that the Cubs never seem to draw walks, and that predates Dusty's arrival by a wide margin.

At any rate, I'm not all that convinced that the numbers show a significant difference; even if they do, Dusty does have some input into the roster construction and utilization patterns of his teams, and the fact that the Cubs have not walked under his tenure implies that the decision-making process in that regard (of which he is a significant part) does NOT favor players who walk.

Besides, if the guy says that he prefers guys who put the ball into play over the take-and-rake crowd, who am I to not believe him?  Nobody on this board knows the sum total of how he instructs his hitters, and I'm wont to believe that if the cat says he doesn't like walks, he isn't going to encourage his hitters to take them.

That's the way it is with the other 'myths' that I apparently bring up when giving the guy a hard time, too.  I don't know what makes players develop in some organizations and not in others, but I see little young talent coming out of the Cubs system and developing on this team while listening to Dusty whine about not having enough veterans on his team, and I have to believe that there's something going on.  If Dusty is bothered by his negative rep in the player development category, the guy should at least not say things that further it.  

Folks can run all the numbers that they want -- and, yeah, numbers occasionally impress me -- but Dusty knows a lot more about baseball than I do, so if he says he doesn't like the walk, I'm going to believe him.

by dustyisdonnie on Jan 9, 2006 10:42 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

When did he say...
that he does not like the walk???

by mannytrillo on Jan 10, 2006 4:53 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Didn't Pierzynski steal first last post season?
He's a rat and he figured out a way to steal first.  I say he stole it because he took something that wasn't his for the taking...that's stealing right?
Hey Norm...if you were a hot dog...would ya eat yourself? -SNL

by EbbyCalvinNukeLaLoosh on Jan 9, 2006 7:37 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Dusty made him a bum, just like LaTroy
Korey gone and I'm glad.  But Dusty ruined him by forcing him into a high pressure role as leadoff man that he did not want and, most importantly, did not feel he was suited for.  Korey thought he should be in the middle of the lineup and he was probably right.  Had he been hitting after Aramis and DLee he wouldn't have had as much pressure and, being the head-case that he is, might have been able to perform up to his potential.  Dusty kept shoving him into the leadoff spot until Korey was ground into dust.

Dusty did the same thing with LaTroy, taking a guy who had proven he was not a closer in MN and forcing him into that role over and over again.

Creating situations where your players will repeatedly fail ruins them.  And this is a guy that's supposed to be a "players' manager?"

Let's play two!!!

by jsmckay on Jan 9, 2006 11:40 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Facts, please
Dusty forced LaTroy to be a closer?  Did he force Joe Borowski to get injured?  Did he force Hawkins and his agent to get a clause inserted into his contract that gave him a bonus based on saves?

Dusty forced Patterson to be a leadoff hitter and that's why Patterson was no good?  Patterson, other than a half season in 2003, has never been good.  No matter where he's batted, he has shown no patience and an inability to master the strike zone.

It really does no good to spout opinions as if they are fact without offering facts to back them up.  It's counterproductive to spout off opinions that you can't support with facts.

All wil be fixed in 2006

by DSZ on Jan 10, 2006 9:05 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

lighten up francis
it is a fact that corey's play deteriorated quite a bit after dusty forced him into a lead-off role that he didn't want and he wasn't suited for. He was solid albeit imperfect in 2004, but really in 2004 plate patience was his major flaw, and that can be worked on in isolation. however, dusty tried to put him into a role he had never played before, during the season, and forcce a change in just about everything in his approach to hitting. That is when he unraveled as a player in just about every facet of the game.

Dusty did not have to make Latroy the closer. He could have, as was hendry's intention, had Dempster there, Wood's injury notwithstanding. It would've been smarter to have a temporary fill-in 5th starter called up until your starter came back than to make your closer, who hasn't had much success as a starter, be the starter, and have your set-up man, who hasn't had any success as a closer, INCLUDING THE SEASON BEFORE ON YOUR TEAM, be your closer.

Let's try to be firendly here, that was a rude response by you.

by tomas21 on Jan 10, 2006 9:22 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Are you serious?
You actually title a post, "lighten up francis" and end it with an admonishment not to be rude.

As there is nothing I can add to that beyond pointing out the plain hypocricy, I will move on.

My frustration reflected in my previous post is one that I feel frequently while reading these pages - negative pronouncements not backed up in fact.  My perception may be skewed.  I'm on my lunch break now and don't have the time to do an analysis of all of the postings on this site.

Nonetheless, the poster I responded to initially has a long history of bashing Dusty Baker with anecdotes and/or pronouncements given without evidence.  This case was one of the latter.

If LaTroy Hawkins was not brought in by Jim Hendry with the possibility that he would be a closer, there was no reason for the clause to be in Hawkins' contract offering more money based on saves.  As for your unsupported assertion that Jim Hendry would have preferred Dempster closing to Hawkins, I'd love to see a quote by Hendry to that effect.

As for your assertion that "it is a fact that corey's play deteriorated quite a bit after dusty forced him into a lead-off role," which you offered with no proof, I suggest you look here: http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/splits?statsId=6400&type=batting&year=2005

Scroll down to where it breaks down Patterson's season by spot in the batting order and you will see that his OPS was better when leading off than anywhere else in the order except third and 7th.  Should you take from that that you think Patterson was better suited to bat 7th, that is a reasonable argument that you can actually support.  But, given Patterson's speed and the lack of anyone else who would make more sense to bat leadoff, I would disagree.

All wil be fixed in 2006

by DSZ on Jan 10, 2006 12:23 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Let's get the lead-off thing straight.
I posted this in another thread, but I seem to recall this being the situation.

Patterson's blood is on Baker's hands, to be sure.

We recall when suddenly Korey stepped up and said he wanted to be the lead-off guy.  Most of us were pleased with his attitude, but concerned about his ability to deliver.

Instead of acknowledging Korey's enthusiasm and then making him EARN THE RIGHT to be a lead-off guy, Baker simply accepted Patterson's assertion and sat him on the top-of-the-order throne.

Wouldn't it have made more sense at the time for Baker to explain to Korey that he would be CONSIDERED for elevation in the order when.........

A) He takes some pitches
B) He cuts down his swing
C) He reduces his strike zone
D) He looks to put the ball in play
E) He takes some MORE pitches
F) He tries to take the ball to LF
G) He cuts down his swing
H) He tries to use his speed via bunting
I) He exercises some patience at the plate

........and on and on and on.

But no - that didn't happen.  Instead "the players manager" allowed himself to be played by the player.  Baker gave Korey the job with no solid baseball foundation for doing so, and the Cubs suffered for another miserable month or so while Patterson continued the downward deathspiral to a trade for a PTBNL......

Baker was a total ass in this entire situation yet only Korey hears the boo birds.  Sorry, but Johnny B. deserves much of the credit for the ruin of Mr. Patterson in Chicago.

by tville on Jan 10, 2006 11:17 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

this is why
"the players manager" allowed himself to be played by the player.

players like dusty. not because he's any good, but because he leaves them do whatever. he's the master enabler -- the outback steakhouse of major league managers. whatever tendency you have, constructive of destructive, it will be given free rein to dominate you as a ballplayer and a person.

that ain't leadership, and it helped destroy patterson. it's also why z's anger management problem will only grow worse, why walker's mouth is never shut, why sammy's boombox was first allowed to blast all day and then why it was smashed without consequence.

by gaius marius on Jan 10, 2006 11:31 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

The flaw of Dusty....
Is not so much his way of treating players. I am sure (but I do not know this) that behind closed doors he deals with the players. I think that is why Walker is on the way out, Walker likes to talk to the media and Dusty doesn't like that. But I digress, Dusty's true flaw is his in game management. Like when he lets Rusch bat in the bottom of the sixth with two out and two on, down by 3 runs. That in itself is not so much a problem except that he only let's Rusch pitch to one guy in the top of the seventh. That is just horrible.

by Imtrejo on Jan 10, 2006 11:55 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

i
think those are 1 and 1a in terms of Baker's biggest faults.
He is a poor in-game tactician, i think anyone who has watched the Cubs or Giants would agree to that.
I think, for all his accolades as a great manager of players, he is only a great manager of players in the right situation. That is, when he has a roster full of already fundamentally sound players without any major malcontents. He seems to have zero coaching ability (as attested by his quotes about not talking to players about baserunning until they make a gaffe), and he doesn't seem to be able to keep a clubhouse together if there are problems.

by tomas21 on Jan 10, 2006 2:07 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think so...
Z isn't going to get worse.  He is getting better.
Cubbie Blue always sPaRkLes in my eyes. Time to sPaRkLe Jimmy!

by sparkles721 on Jan 10, 2006 4:25 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

to be honest
and i'm gonna get lambasted for this -- z is probably as good right now as he will ever be.

not only will his anger management become an issue if someone doesn't teach him how to keep from flying apart on the mound.

i've also rarely seen a pitcher who relied so much on his stuff and so little on precise location. z's gameplan is often to throw it down the middle. his movement is incredible, so he gets away with it. but that won't last.

if he gets hurt -- which is just a matter of time, playing for pitcher-killer baker -- and his stuff doesn't come back, he will get tagged. we kinda get a preview of that every now and again, when dusty's used him too hard and his movement goes away. remember june of last year?

that may not mean "trade him now" -- but if you want to sell high, players rarely get higher than zambrano is now.

by gaius marius on Jan 10, 2006 7:42 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Z is 24 years old...
... you'd think the anger management thing would eventually go away with maturity.

There are some pitchers who can handle this sort of workload. Z appears to me to be the kind of pitcher who can.

Another full year ought to tell for sure.

by Al on Jan 10, 2006 8:08 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

i hope so -- but
there were troubling signs all last year of overuse and repetitive stress injuries. "internet elbow" in may, complete with mri. "turf toe" in june. and that series of short starts followed by a return to form -- indicating perhaps that the kid needs more rest and less use. and z has, of course, accumulated more pitcher abuse points over the last two seasons than anyone but livan hernandez and jason schmidt (which, i'm sure, had nothing to do with schmidt's 2005 collapse -- yeah. certainly.)

i'd be ready for it. baker is a murderer.

by gaius marius on Jan 11, 2006 9:17 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Neither one of those injuries...
... was related to pitching, now were they?

I don't think that Baker's use or misuse of Z had anything to do with those things, and his arm seems sound.

We shall see.

by Al on Jan 11, 2006 9:35 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

don't make me laugh, al
Neither one of those injuries was related to pitching, now were they?

i suppose you think prior's problem in 2004 -- after a year in which he was mercilessly beat to pieces in the playoff run -- was his achilles? hardy har har.

most teams try to mute the injury status of their young players when they can. the cubs are no different than anyone else.

and this thing with baker has a long history. billy swift never recovered from 232 innings in baker's first year as manager. john burkett spent part of 1994 disabled after throwing the same number of innings for that team.

some guys can take it. livan, for example, is a freak of nature in that way. but there are very few. the odds of z being one of them seems to me pretty remote, given the way these aches and pains are already showing up.

by gaius marius on Jan 11, 2006 9:51 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Prior...
... is healthy now, isn't he? Or do you have evidence showing otherwise?

Again, this is like the Dempster argument you and I have had.

I think Z can handle it. You don't.

Only time will tell.

by Al on Jan 11, 2006 10:26 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

prior's health
Prior is healthy now, isn't he?

pretty clearly he isn't. the kid's had spats of elbow pain in 2004 and 2005, has never had a cause diagnosed and has consequently never been treated.

i wrote last march:

"the cubs have never really discovered what's wrong in there. larry rothschild can say things like "This is something he may have to learn to deal with regularly", and "... it shouldn't be a problem. Medication will calm it down" -- but he knows as much as you or i what is really going on mechanically in there, which is nothing. and how long do you imagine the cubs can or should trot the 25-y/o franchise pitcher out to the mound with consistent elbow pain -- pain debilitating enough to double his walk rate and raise his ERA by more than a run even after two months off -- of an indeterminate origin?"

rothschild was quoted in the sun-times.

has anything changed since then -- except the marking of another year in which prior felt pain in that elbow? and moreover faded in the last two months?

by gaius marius on Jan 11, 2006 10:46 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Lots has changed...
Prior finished the season.  He is fine now.

And Z did have two unrelated pitching injuries.  The internet thing was later said that it could've been because he swung the bat hard and extra BP.  The toe injury was because he hurt it while running the bases in that game against the Red Sox.

Z is a horse.

Cubbie Blue always sPaRkLes in my eyes. Time to sPaRkLe Jimmy!

by sparkles721 on Jan 11, 2006 1:34 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree....
 ... lots has changed. Prior did not miss a start after returning from the broken elbow.

He was 1-2 in September, but threw 28 innings in five starts, struck out 34 and had a 3.45 ERA, below his season ERA of 3.67.

You quote yourself and ESPN from a year ago, gaius. Let's see what happens THIS spring before you back up and keep going to what happened a year ago.

by Al on Jan 11, 2006 1:51 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

it'll be too late
to do anything to change it by the time it happens.

being honest with ourselves about what's going on with the kid -- undiagnosed, untreated elbow pain in two consecutive years -- is a starting point from which to constructively criticize the cubs plan for 2006.

threw 28 innings in five starts

that doesn't concern you? you saw him pitch. he was not himself.

by gaius marius on Jan 11, 2006 4:09 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I will reserve judgment...
... till I see him pitch in 2006. If it appears to be the same problem, then I will agree with you.

by Al on Jan 11, 2006 4:46 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

wadr
this is the logic that catches the cubs out so often, holding the bag on a player that has crapped out when they could've sold high or at least hedged their bets.

on this team, given what we're discussing, it's unconscionable not to have at least one if not two more starters. a team with one frontline starter looking at a bullpen career, another with the arm pain were talking about and a third showing signs of overuse and repetitive stress CANNOT sit tight on a back end of maddux, williams and rusch. they have no hedge against the probabilities we're discussing here. the cubs NEED to add pitching NOW in order to be competitive. by the time you get the confirmation you're seeking, al, the season will be by the boards. again.

passivity can be useful, but not when it's uncoupled from a pragmatic analysis of likelihoods. when so, it's just rationalizing intellectual laziness.

by gaius marius on Jan 12, 2006 9:06 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Ahhh!
Too many big words!  You like big words don't you gaius?

I won't believe Prior has arm pain until he says he does.  Z is overused I agree with that. Is it hurting him?  Not from what I see.

Cubbie Blue always sPaRkLes in my eyes. Time to sPaRkLe Jimmy!

by sparkles721 on Jan 12, 2006 11:41 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

hope you're right, spark
but the warning signs are there. that's all i'm saying.

that said, even if i'm right, it may not happen this year.

by gaius marius on Jan 11, 2006 4:10 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

How are those signs?
He hit a base.  That has nothing to do with pitching.

What may not happen?  Z's injury?  I'm getting a little confused, but if it is about a Z injury, I think he won't get injured anytime soon.

Cubbie Blue always sPaRkLes in my eyes. Time to sPaRkLe Jimmy!

by sparkles721 on Jan 11, 2006 5:58 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

if he's
you'd think the anger management thing would eventually go away with maturity.

given some kind of guidance, it surely would. but guidance apparently isn't in dusty's master plan. fortysomething moises alou regressed into a petulant child under baker. sosa was little better. wood (when he's pitching) wears every close call on his sleeve like he'd never been squeezed, kicking the mound and mouthing off. if 2005 was better than 2004, it was because the 2004 club was probably the most uncomposed team in any professional sport i've ever watched.

i hope he has a strong family influence to set him right. without that, he's got little better chance than paris hilton to keep it together while playing for baker.

by gaius marius on Jan 11, 2006 9:24 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh gosh...
Gaius, I'm a kid.  Don't scare me like that.  It's a good thing I don't ever have nightmares.

I remember June very well.  He freaked me out.  I was so worried about him.  That day he pitched in Milwaukee was horrible. That day I believe he said he was using too much velocity instead of a lower velocity to get more movement and better control.  That was probably his worst start ever.  But his next start he was awesome.

I disagree with the anger management thing.  He was a lot better last year about it.  Sure, he is emotional and off the top of my head the days that affected him were opening day and the game he pitched against the Mets, but that day he got pulled for a sore back.  Other than that though, I love Z's energy. When Z makes a critical pitch and pumps his fist in the air, it makes me laugh every single time.  He may roll his eyes sometimes, but he calms down, breathes, holds the ball, and then throws a good pitch.

As everyone on this blog already knows, I love Z.  If he ever gets traded, I would be extremely angry.  I think I need to translate your post into  Spanish and send it to Z.  He is so competitive he would just love to show he is going to get even better.  And he will.

Cubbie Blue always sPaRkLes in my eyes. Time to sPaRkLe Jimmy!

by sparkles721 on Jan 10, 2006 8:17 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

sorry spark
Gaius, I'm a kid.  Don't scare me like that.

sometimes i forget. ;)

by gaius marius on Jan 11, 2006 10:48 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

That's ok...
Like I said, I don't ever have nightmares so I will be fine! :)
Cubbie Blue always sPaRkLes in my eyes. Time to sPaRkLe Jimmy!

by sparkles721 on Jan 11, 2006 1:38 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

This is one time...
I actually believe his anger on the mound is a good thing, as long as he doesn't lose focus. I agree with Al, he seems like a horse who can handle the work load.
And by the way stop scaring children...

by Imtrejo on Jan 10, 2006 9:03 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

It's to bad Corey didn't work out...
and it's to bad that he left our team the way he did; a discraced former top prospect with not many options left for him in the windy city.  

However, I think that this is really the best we could get for him considering, unless it was a package deal with other players on the move as well.  

It would have been great seeing Corey succeed in a cubbie uniform but certain circumstances beyond anyone control did not allow for that to happen.  I wish Corey the best of luck unless it's a game 7 world series, Cubs/Orioles, and Corey is at the plate, other then that, best of luck.

by DTJchris on Jan 9, 2006 3:51 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Korey
I wouldn't worry about that too much, he'd strike out anyways.

by pmenadue on Jan 9, 2006 11:17 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Addition by Subtraction
This move simply opens a spot on the 40 man roster.  Anything that the minor leaguers obtained in this trade do is gravy.
One day, the dream will come true.

by brianp88 on Jan 9, 2006 3:56 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Sophmore slump?
Murton played in only 51 games with 140 AB's.  I personally think he is being overrated by most fans because of his success in the short time he played last year.  Did Boston really miss the boat on him that bad?  He'll probably turn out to be a "decent" player but not one I would want to throw out there everyday as my starting LF, not yet anyway.  But I guess I would say that for our starting RF (Jones) as well.  This 2006 team so far looks like a sub .500 team easy.

by SonnyJ9 on Jan 9, 2006 4:04 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

i agree
i also remember quite a few of his clutch hits being slow dribblers up the 3rd base line on a full swing.  He has proven nothing yet.  

by mike bornemann on Jan 9, 2006 4:25 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes
I think Murton will put on a decent performance next year, but at times it feels like he is being overrated when there are discussions about the outfield.  Not that it's a good comparison of the two as players, but a lot of people were really excited about Jason Dubois a year ago because of his performance in late 2004.  I think that Murton will be a much better player than Dubois, but I'm not completely sold on him being a major factor for 2006.

by Zachary on Jan 9, 2006 4:49 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

This is best for Corey
There is no way the cubs could allow him to get verbally trashed for another season. Good luck to Corey. I hope he has a good career, not a great one.
cubsfan4life

by cubfan4life on Jan 9, 2006 4:08 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Why not great?
He's not even in the same league as the Cubs. I wish him the best.
According to the Chicago Tribune: "The Oakland A's are 32-0 when they have scored more runs than their opponents.

by Carlos on Jan 9, 2006 4:14 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Great=Proof
Great performance by Corey elsewhere would be proof that the Cubs screwed him up.  Prima facia evidence that Baker, Baylor, Hendry and Fleita didn't know what the hell they were doing.

by FauxChuck on Jan 9, 2006 4:29 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Great? No.
I don't expect Corey to have a great career. If he did all we would hear for the rest of our lives is the comparison of Corey to Lou Brock. So therefore, I hope he has a good career but not a great one.
cubsfan4life

by cubfan4life on Jan 9, 2006 4:46 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

A quick note...
... neither of the players acquired are being added to the 40-man roster.

Thus, the roster stands at 39; there's an open spot. Don't expect it to remain empty for too long.

by Al on Jan 9, 2006 4:29 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

I was...
just going to ask if they were on the 40-man.  So, since they are not, then Hendry now has space to fill the last spot with Grissom.  WOO!!!

As long as the Cubs didn't have to eat one penny of Patterson's contract, I could care less who we got.  He had to be moved and he batted .215 last year.  What more should we expect from another over touted position prospect from the Cubs system.  He goes along with Hill, Choi, Dubois and others now.

by mannytrillo on Jan 9, 2006 4:46 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

In all fairness
Choi has done pretty well against righties and is just looking for an everyday shot.  I dont see him as a bust.

by saluki05 on Jan 10, 2006 11:58 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Why is Lenny Harris available ?
Not sure but Jose Hernandez is

by jessica on Jan 9, 2006 5:25 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I always felt bad for Corey
when he got bood real bad but I can truly say that his performance usually warranted some sort of chastizing. I also wish him well but I have to remember my newly discovered despise of the O's so I can't really wish him too well. So long Corey, see ya in another life.  
Hey Norm...if you were a hot dog...would ya eat yourself? -SNL

by EbbyCalvinNukeLaLoosh on Jan 9, 2006 4:37 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

It is sad...
I really wanted him to succeed and prove he could be what everyone thought he could.  But he didn't. I wish him luck too.

Thank you Corey for making that awesome catch and turning it into a double play in order to save one of Z's shutouts.  It made both me and Z very happy.

Cubbie Blue always sPaRkLes in my eyes. Time to sPaRkLe Jimmy!

by sparkles721 on Jan 9, 2006 4:51 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

David Eckstein?
A BA article on Spears makes the connection.

If he turns into another David Eckstein, I'll be very happy.  Eckstein ain't great, but I think we'd have all traded Patterson for him.

Baseball can be summed up in one word--you never know--Joaquin Andujar

by Josh77 on Jan 9, 2006 5:23 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Sounds encouraging
Maybe a player that Billy Beane would like.
Let's include him in the package for Zito.

by slide on Jan 9, 2006 5:35 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I am going to miss...
That strange smile(or grimace) when Corey was standing in the batter's box. I am not going to miss him swinging as hard as he can and poping the ball up to the shortstop.

by Imtrejo on Jan 9, 2006 5:56 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Corey
I remember the game against the Dodgers on August 13, 2004, when Corey made two phenomenal catches and proceeded to throw out an advancing runner after each one (one at home, and one at third). It was about the one highlight of that day, when Farns gave up about 6 runs in the 8th to put the final nail in the coffin. I wish him well, but I'm damn glad he's not going to be wearing Cubbie blue anymore.

by Perkins on Jan 9, 2006 6:21 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

I was at the game
I remember Farns giving up the runs.  I don't remember Corey's plays though.

by mike bornemann on Jan 9, 2006 9:45 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, me too
Maddux pitched a heck of a game, but with next to no run support...and then Farns...

by Perkins on Jan 10, 2006 3:00 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Looks like Corey...
still doesn't know what his problem is.

From the Foxsports.com article:
"He also hopes to provide speed at the top of the lineup, perhaps in the No. 2 spot ahead of Melvin Mora and Miguel Tejada.

'I'm a guy who can get on base, and if I can steal bases and get into scoring position, that would really help the team,' Patterson said."

He can get on base?? Since when? I wish I could help Corey.

Cubbie Blue always sPaRkLes in my eyes. Time to sPaRkLe Jimmy!

by sparkles721 on Jan 9, 2006 6:34 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Yeah Right!
I am a bit sad to see him go because of so much promise wasted, but I also saw that quote about being a guy that gets on base and my first reaction was....oh yeah? Then I realized he didn't say "a lot" he just said he gets on base, which is technically true. lol

by jtiet on Jan 9, 2006 9:41 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Well, yeah...
technically it is true.  You're right.

I need to give Corey more credit.  He CAN get on base! :)

Cubbie Blue always sPaRkLes in my eyes. Time to sPaRkLe Jimmy!

by sparkles721 on Jan 9, 2006 9:48 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Somebody had to....
Feed him that line. There is no way he said that on his own, how many times did he say excatly the opposite thing when he was with the Cubs, "I am not a lead of hitter I'm a number three."

by Imtrejo on Jan 10, 2006 1:36 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Corey needed a change of scenery
and I wish him well.  I still think he will end up being a pretty good player.  I don't think he will reach the stardom that was once predicted for him but I do think he has several pretty good years ahead of him.  I really think the Cubs handling of him and the fans (me included) high expectations were too much for him.  A fresh start and clear role will be good for him.    

While I agree that he needed to be traded I don't like our return.  I would like to think we could have done better than this.  What would the harm have been in letting him go through spring training to see if his value goes up.  I'm sure this type of trade would have still been available even if he had a bad spring.  Heck, for what we got we could have simply released him before the season.  

Now that he is gone I would like the Cubs to acquire another outfielder to serve as the # 4 as insurance in case Murton or Jones don't pan out.  I would rather Mabry be a pinch hitter and Grissom play in Iowa.  Even though Hairston can play the outfield I would rather consider him our starting second baseman.  I say this because I am assuming Walker will be the next to go and I do not want Neifi starting.    

by AZ Saluki on Jan 9, 2006 6:41 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Furcal to have knee surgery
The Dodgers say the knew about it during negotiations. Maybe this is why they need so many infielders. Jeff Kent is having surgery on his right wrist to remove scar tissue.

http://tinyurl.com/8css7

by LT on Jan 9, 2006 6:49 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

We'll see about that, Al
And it's sad, really: that someone with the athletic gifts -- the "tools" we always heard about, but rarely saw -- of Corey Patterson, simply didn't have the head, or the heart, to make it as a major league player.

Personally, I predict a breakout in Baltimore.

by dvdmgsr on Jan 9, 2006 7:05 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

I couldn't disagree more...
... it seems, given the chaotic state of that franchise, about the least likely place for such a breakout.

by Al on Jan 9, 2006 7:10 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Not a chance...
I don't care what the Cubs history is like, he will not be another Dontrelle , Garland, or whoever.  He doesn't have it...plain and simple.  The difference is that those players allowed themselves to be coached and guided to where they are now.  Corey is just lazy as hell.  He will NOT have a breakout season, he may hit better than he did here but I might be able to if I swung at every pitch as hard as I could.  Best of luck but not seein it happen in Baltimore either.
Anyone can have a bad century...

by Kinky Reggae on Jan 9, 2006 9:48 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I think he could flourish in Baltimore
Not be "great' but pretty good. Baltimore
is not a team in chaos , it has a screwed
up owner who is hurting the team but
I think the new manager & Mazzone could
improve the team. There is no way they
are likely to compete but  this should be
GOOD for Corey. He will certainly be under
pressure but nothing like being booed
relelentlessly at Wrigley. I think both
he AND LaTroy will have good seasons

by jessica on Jan 9, 2006 10:02 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Could be...
I think no more booing for both will do them good.

And maybe they can make Tejada happier.

Cubbie Blue always sPaRkLes in my eyes. Time to sPaRkLe Jimmy!

by sparkles721 on Jan 9, 2006 10:17 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

We'll see about that.
Corey Patterson was the Official Cubs Scapegoat Player of 2005 (LaTroy Hawkins had it wrapped up until he was traded). Indeed, he had no chance of succeeding in the Cubs organization, but a change of scenery should do him wonders.

Now, you have a point about Baltimore, an organization that is even more dysfunctional than the Cubs.  But at least, in recent years, they've had some young position players break out.

by dvdmgsr on Jan 10, 2006 8:29 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

one less boo to launch
One less boo in the bleachers on an inning killing K. Too bad, I think he was a good guy; he had to go. A few years back I sat with an older retired couple from Illinois at Maryvale at a Cubs game. They were volunteer car parkers. We started talking Cubs and they told me CP lived with them during spring training (before he "made it"). They went on and on what a polite down to earth guy, never partied late, was just a super kid. I always remembered that and thought how that had to hurt hearing the boos and taunts. It had to be done and like many of you, good luck Corey. I personally think it will take a few years to get back to what he might have been. So.....who gets the boos now??

by mrcubsfan on Jan 9, 2006 7:34 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Never partied late?
That's not what I heard, from people who saw him partying in Scottsdale one spring.

by Al on Jan 9, 2006 7:35 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Help me here
Did something fall on my head and knock me out, but wasn't this the same site that was filled with posts about how bad Korey was playing? Did everyone forget about all the times he was picked off? Did we forget about all the times he struck out on 3 pitches a mile outside the strike zone? I specifically remember the series out here in Denver where they walked the bases loaded about 5 times JUST to pitch to him. How about all the times he took unbelievable routes to fly balls? You can look at the potential wasted and cry all you want, but facts are facts. He was a below average, overrated, player that never lived up to his potential.

by pmenadue on Jan 9, 2006 11:30 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

I couldn't make
it through work tonight knowing that Korey was gone.

My heart was so broken I had to give a co-worker a hug.

2006 -- AC036097 -- Eamus Catuli!

by priorpwnz on Jan 10, 2006 1:06 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

LOL!
Do you want me to let you borrow my teddy bear named Timmy? :)
Cubbie Blue always sPaRkLes in my eyes. Time to sPaRkLe Jimmy!

by sparkles721 on Jan 10, 2006 4:28 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

as
long as you clean it!
2006 -- AC036097 -- Eamus Catuli!

by priorpwnz on Jan 11, 2006 1:10 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Sure!
Or maybe I'll buy you a new one.  And name him Corey.
Cubbie Blue always sPaRkLes in my eyes. Time to sPaRkLe Jimmy!

by sparkles721 on Jan 11, 2006 1:39 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

you
simply do these things to torture me don't you?
2006 -- AC036097 -- Eamus Catuli!

by priorpwnz on Jan 11, 2006 5:56 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

No I don't...
I'm just trying to be nice.
Cubbie Blue always sPaRkLes in my eyes. Time to sPaRkLe Jimmy!

by sparkles721 on Jan 11, 2006 6:01 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

uh huh
I think you just like trying to get me riled up.
2006 -- AC036097 -- Eamus Catuli!

by priorpwnz on Jan 12, 2006 12:38 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Trying?
Of course I'm trying to get you riled up.  It's fun! :)
Cubbie Blue always sPaRkLes in my eyes. Time to sPaRkLe Jimmy!

by sparkles721 on Jan 12, 2006 11:36 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

oh you
are too kind dear, aren't you supposed to be in school by the way?
2006 -- AC036097 -- Eamus Catuli!

by priorpwnz on Jan 12, 2006 12:39 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I know I'm kind...
and I already went to school.
Cubbie Blue always sPaRkLes in my eyes. Time to sPaRkLe Jimmy!

by sparkles721 on Jan 12, 2006 12:51 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

sigh
crazy girl and her crazy half day.
2006 -- AC036097 -- Eamus Catuli!

by priorpwnz on Jan 12, 2006 1:23 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I know...
but I know everyone on this blog loves my craziness! :P
Cubbie Blue always sPaRkLes in my eyes. Time to sPaRkLe Jimmy!

by sparkles721 on Jan 12, 2006 1:28 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

sigh
sad but true.
2006 -- AC036097 -- Eamus Catuli!

by priorpwnz on Jan 12, 2006 11:08 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

i feel
like i'm reading a tom hanks/meg ryan movie.

by tomas21 on Jan 11, 2006 6:00 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Good call Tomas
do you have enough popcorn for this one.

by greggie44 on Jan 11, 2006 6:10 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Don't worry...
I got some popcorn I can give! :)
Cubbie Blue always sPaRkLes in my eyes. Time to sPaRkLe Jimmy!

by sparkles721 on Jan 11, 2006 6:14 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

ironically
one of my ex's professors was Tom Hank's brother.
2006 -- AC036097 -- Eamus Catuli!

by priorpwnz on Jan 12, 2006 12:39 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

my frustration
is with hendry's terrible timing with a lot of his signings/trades the last two years.  It's as though he's completely waived away the whole "but low, sell high" principle.

Starting with giving Kerry Wood an enormous extension about ten minutes after his first solid season/playoffs. The with the trades of some of our scapegoats, such as Sosa/Latroy/Corey, he trades them when their value is at the lowest in their entire career. And if that wasn't enough, they make it publically known that they want to trade tehm and that they can't live with them anymore. He did manage to get a useful part for Latroy, in fairness.

But I think just about everyone here knew that Sosa wasn't going to work for us BEFORE the 2004 season, and same with Corey BEFORE the 2005 season. They still had trade value at that point. He waited until the player had completely ruined themselves under the Dusty regime to dump them. Especially when its our player, you should have enough insight into them to get rid of them while they have some value. its basic business philosophy.

I like the bullpen signings of this year, but its the same thing. we now have one of the most expensive bullpens in baseball, and nobody has really had more than a season of success.

Hendry has made some good moves since 2003 (i still think the nomar signing was good, especially since murton came with it), but his moves seem like they are made more by a high school-aged fantasy baseball manager than a professional GM.

But he can win me back. If he went and got Lugo without giving up anyone i like i'd be excited again.

by tomas21 on Jan 10, 2006 9:15 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

amen to all that
hendry is the worst at selling high -- truly appears to be a novice in an expert's game. perhaps an admirable quality in player development, but a fatal flaw for a gm.

by gaius marius on Jan 10, 2006 10:33 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Well...
... he did do a pretty good job of "selling high" on Bobby Hill, for example.

But you are right that Patterson would have brought far more a year ago, or even in midseason last year. So would Bobby Brownlie, and others.

by Al on Jan 10, 2006 10:39 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

i agree
but one of my points is that Hendry's moves seemed to be more ill-timed AFTER 2003. up til then, he seemed to have great timing. Even the Dontrelle trade, which he gets blasted the most for, and in retrospect worked out better for the Marlins, was a gooddeal at the time.
I know he's been going through some personal struggles, and maybe that's to blame, but he seems to have lost some of the great timing he showed before.

by tomas21 on Jan 10, 2006 2:10 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I thought I might provide a Spears scouting report
Nate Spears, 2B/SS, Baltimore Orioles
Drafted 134th Overall (5th Rd), 2003 Draft, HS, Port Charlotte, FL
Bats L/Throws R 20 yrs old 5'11", 155-160 lbs

Spears does not have a lot of power, but he coaches all say he knows how to play the game. He has evidenced good plate discipline, Spears has a line drive swing where he is able to put balls into the gaps. There are comparisons to David Eckstein, in the O's system he is playing 2B, some report he should play SS too although he's projected to play second long term. Spears possesses speed, projected earliest call up is 2007.

Bill Veeck planted them during the depression, ivy on the walls.

by Ivy Walls on Jan 10, 2006 9:41 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

A question was asked...
...on the Score this morning. How will you feel if Corey turns his career around in Baltimore? Here's my answer to that question. If Corey turns his career around and starts to produce, it will be a complete indictment of the Cubs inability to develope talent. An assesment should be made of the organizations coaches, scouts and instructors and then a decision should be made on who gets fired. I thought that was supposed to be Gary Hughes job.
cubsfan4life

by cubfan4life on Jan 10, 2006 1:40 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Do we really need to see him do well
to indict their inability to develop talent?  I think that it's obvious that he COULD have been a good player.  Not necessarily even as good as Juan Pierre, but good.  I don't know what went wrong, and it could well be his attitude, but he did have potential, and it's been squandered, at least by the Cubs.

by cubbybear on Jan 10, 2006 8:33 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Has the Cubs...
...farm system produced any good position players over the last 2 1/2 decades? The answer is no. That should already be an indictment on their failure to produce good viable major league talent. I do wish Patterson well. However if I see him start producing in the near future that will cement my belief that the organization needs to bring in some outside people to help assess where the failures have ocurred in their system and then proceed with a correct course of action.
cubsfan4life

by cubfan4life on Jan 10, 2006 9:47 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

25 years?
I think you'd better amend that:

Mark Grace, Rafael Palmeiro, Joe Carter are three pretty damn good ones.  I can name a lot of others with long careers--Dunston, Girardi, Glanville, Eric Hinske, Dave Martinez.  I still think Choi can hit.

Of course, both the failures and the successes of the the farm system in the mid to late 80's are pretty irrelevant to the ability of the current regime to produce positional talent.   And I wouldn't defend their record on this recently.  It's just that none in 25 years is pretty clearly false.

Baseball can be summed up in one word--you never know--Joaquin Andujar

by Josh77 on Jan 11, 2006 3:02 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Jon Garland
Dontrelle Willis....I agree with Josh, better amend that.
2006 -- AC036097 -- Eamus Catuli!

by priorpwnz on Jan 11, 2006 3:08 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Josh...
... was talking about position players. Garland and Willis are pitchers.

And of course, the Cub farm system has produced Wood, Prior and Zambrano, too.

by Al on Jan 11, 2006 4:30 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

oh
well still, the farm system in general has produced good things.
2006 -- AC036097 -- Eamus Catuli!

by priorpwnz on Jan 11, 2006 8:10 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

What I should have said...
...it has been almost 2 decades since the Cubs produced a talented position player. Grace being that player. The players you named Dunston, Girardi,Glanville,Hinske,Martinez and Choi are or were serviceable major league players at best. Don't  you think it's pretty pathetic this organization hasn't been able to scout and develope talent? You can mention pitchers all you want but their natural talent can sometimes overcome the lack of instruction.
cubsfan4life

by cubfan4life on Jan 11, 2006 8:15 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Good point on pitchers
With top of the draft pitchers like Wood and Prior, I don't consider them to be products of the farm system.  Technically, they come up through the system but it is just a matter of grooming for the big club.

by greggie44 on Jan 11, 2006 11:11 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Instead of 25 years...
Let's just look at the last 10 or so years. I can not think of one position player the Cubs have brought out of there system that has made an allstar game, just one allstar game as the 30th guy. A friend and I were discussing this at a bad game late last year and we tried to name another team that could say the same thing. We couldn't come up with one.

by Imtrejo on Jan 11, 2006 9:51 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry for being...
...so negative here. Since this deal with Patterson, it got me thinking about what notable position players the cubs farm system has produced. In the last twenty years I can only think of one. The only thing that gives me hope about Murton is that he wasn't scouted and developed by the cubs. I also have hope for Cedeno who is a product of the Cubs farm system. I don't know why I have hope for him. I guess it's because I'm a Cubs fan.
cubsfan4life

by cubfan4life on Jan 11, 2006 8:23 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon
Start posting about the Cubs »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

66103_small
The Ordinary Wizarding Levels of Milton Bradley & the 2009 Chicago Cubs
Chicagocubs1914_small
OT: Big-Ten, Vista-Demolition, Bad-News-Bears, Anything-Goes-on-a-Weekend Game Thread
Jake_fox_small
Cubs Should Go After Rich Hill
Chicagocubs1914_small
Last Out to First Pitch – The 2009-10 Offseason IT'S HAPPENING!!!??? Contest
Small
More From the Cubs in Winter Ball

Recent FanPosts

Dscn2381_small
The Only CF That Fits for 2010
Small
Bradley For Millwood?
Fukudome_bleachers_small
The Top 10 Cubs Games of 2009
Sandberg94home_small
An argument for Mike Cameron
P272649reg_small
OT: How will the Big Ten wind up and who goes where?
Small
Should we trade him, or should we not?
Madduxflag_small
Starlin Castro Vitters etc LIVE Sat night
Helmet_small
Az Fall League Cubs

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Gomez to drink your Brew, Hardy to eat your Twinkie
BP interviews Sam Fuld. Great read!
Who was the best MLB player born on your birthday?

Recent FanShots

Wow! Look at Sosa
No instant replay upcoming
Marlon Byrd to the Cubs??
Rumorville
Should Cubs pursue another lefty Cardinals CF
Job Opening with the Cubs
Cubs trying hard to trade Bradley
Victor Zambrano's mother kidnapped in Venezuela
Cubs GM Jim Hendry says Milton Bradley may be back in 2010, and called the outfielder's '09 season a "major hiccup"
Bradley 3 Way-Trade????

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

It Is Only...

Cubs By The Numbers

Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.

Click here to order your copy, available now!

SPONSORS

Recent Stories in Ticket Exchanges

Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: Cubs Convention 2010
Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: General 2009 Ticket Exchange
Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: September 29-October 4 Homestand

Managing Editor

Yelloncard_small Al

Editorial Cartoonist

Toonmike_small toonmike

Contributors

Dsc_0139_small holy mackerel

100px-boisehawkscaplogo_small Josh77

Small shawndgoldman