Bleed Cubbie Blue: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Myers, Phillies Top Dodgers Bar-right-arrows



The Top 100 Cubs Of All Time - #81 Bill Hands

This is Bill Hands' 1970 card which shows clearly the 1969 MLB 100th Anniversary patch all players wore that year. The uniform is obviously the road uniform, but I can't quite tell where the photo was taken. And, it appears to be another one of those "fake pitching motion" shots that were so popular with the Topps photographers from the 1950s through the 1970s.

Profile by BCB reader goody14

The 1969 Cubs are known for many things - some of them not so positive. This team contained three Hall of Famers in Banks, Jenkins and Williams and another player should be in the Hall with Santo. The team also had two 20 game winners. The obvious first one would be the aforementioned Jenkins, but the other one that would win a bar bet anywhere except Clark and Addison is Bill Hands, nicknamed "Froggy" for reasons lost to time.

Bill was born in Hackensack, New Jersey, on May 6, 1940 and signed with the San Francisco Giants out of high school. It took him six years to make it to the major leagues in 1965, and after pitching only 6 innings for the Giants that year, he was traded along with Randy Hundley to the Cubs during the offseason, in exchange for Lindy McDaniel and Don Landrum, one of the better deals that GM John Holland made in that era. He pitched both as a starter and reliever in 1966 and 1967 putting up around 150 innings pitched in each season.

In 1968 things started to click for Bill. He became almost exclusively a starter and put up a 16-10 record and jumped his innings pitched from 150 to 258 2/3. He made another jump in 1969 pitching 300 innings. He wound up going 20-14 and was in top ten in ERA, wins, WHIP, BB/9, innings, and complete games.

While in his prime Hands had impeccable control. In 1968 he walked only 36 men in his 258 2/3 innings. He did give up the most home runs in the league during this season, but with no one on base he still managed to pitch a below league average ERA.  Jenkins also tended to give up lots of long balls but not many runs due to the lack of walks - maybe the Cubs should give modern day pitchers this important lesson.

Hands was an atrocious batter even for a pitcher. During his career he hit .078 and "slugged" .091. Only 6 of his career 37 hits went for extra bases - all doubles.  During one stretch in 1968 he whiffed in 14 straight official at bats setting a major league record. In 1972, the last season he came to the plate before being traded to the DH league, he had one hit in 57 at-bats (.018), and struck out thirty times.

While the microscopic attention paid to pitchers and pitch counts is a fairly new phenomenon, the effects of over use are evident even in older ballplayers - no matter how many Bob Gibson stories Tim McCarver tells each October.  Bill Hands is a great case study for pitcher burnout. In his 4th season his innings pitched jumped by over 100. Starting with that season the next four seasons he racked up 258 2/3, 300, 265 and 242 innings - the last of those seasons was the only under .500. He was 31 after the fourth season in this stretch.

His innings and effectiveness fell in each of the next four seasons; he was, among the famed members of the 1969 team, the first to be dealt, traded to the Twins for Dave LaRoche after the 1972 season, but not before turning in the best game of his career that last Cub season, a one-hit shutout of the Expos in Montreal on August 3. Hands threw six perfect innings before issuing a walk and giving up a single with one out in the seventh.

He spent three mediocre seasons with the Twins and Rangers and after the 1975 season, he was out of baseball at 35. The website baseballlibrary.com states his downfall was brought about by "back ailments and muscle spasms in his pitching arm". Diagnosing pitcher misuse from anecdotal and observational data is a slippery slope, but no one can argue that Hands had a short peak probably due to an exaggerated ramp up in usage. No matter how his career ended, his best season will always be remembered as coinciding with one of the Cubs' best in the mid 20th century.

After retirement Hands moved to the small community of Orient on eastern Long Island and started an oil business, which also has a retail gas station, and you can find him there most days even today. Earlier this year the website baseballsavvy.com located him there and he professed to still being a Cubs fan:

"I root for the Cubs, but they're hard to root for," he says. "First of all you don't get to see them that often [on television in Orient], and they never win. I mean, I'm a Cubs fan. I follow them, but I'm just a baseball fan in general. I like to watch a good ball game."

When asked if he thinks the Cubs will ever win another World Series, Hands replies: "They're due. I mean, the Red Sox won one, the White Sox won one; why not the Cubs?"

Bill Hands' career stats at baseball-reference.com

0 recs | Comment 27 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Hands' 1970 Topps card
I'm not sure, but I think the photo was taken at Shea Stadium. For some reason (maybe because Topps Card Company was based in Brooklyn), most of the photos on their cards were taken at Shea or Yankee Stadium at that time. It's almost impossible to find a photo of a player at Wrigley on any of the Topps cards from that period.

by danimal15 on Nov 30, 2006 8:46 AM CST   0 recs

It looks like Shea...
... except for the wall. The seating areas definitely look like Shea. It would make sense for a NY-based company to take its player photos when their teams came to NY.

by Al on Nov 30, 2006 8:57 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

Hands card
 Yes, I believe it is Shea Stadium.
 It's a 1970 card but I think the picture
 was probably taken during the 1969 season.
 I have most of the cards you have shown.
 My collection has cards as far back as
 the 50's.
 Fun idea showing these cards from the
 past Al.....Thanks.
Cubspizza

by quarryfan on Nov 30, 2006 2:55 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Pitch Counts
Al,

If Bill Hands is your Exhibit "A" for pitch count fanatacism, may I counter with the following:

  1. Fergie Jenkins, 4 consecutive 300+ inning seasons. Pitched in the majors until age 40.
  2. Luis Tiant. Pitched as many as 311 innings in a season. Retired at 41.
  3. GAylord Perry. 6 seasons of over 300 innings pitched. Pitched in the majors until age 44.
  4. Nolan Ryan. Pitched as many as 332 innings, with oodles of complete games. Retired at 46.
  5. Bert Blyleven. Pitched 325 innings at age 22! Retired at age 41.
  6. Mickey Lolich. Pitched as many as 376 innings. Retired at 38.
  7. Tom Seaver. Pitched as many as 290 innings. Retired at 41.
I could go on......Pitchers today are babied, and do not condition themselves to throw as many innings as they should. It makes for a less attractive game, as well. FOr crying out loud, a 16 game winner won the Cy Young Award in the NL this year! We are headed to a style of baseball where the stud starting pitcher will be a thing of the past. I hope that trend is arrested, but it won't be as long as the pitch count fanatics rule the baseball world....

by perseman on Dec 1, 2006 2:56 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Again...
... for every example you gave, there's likely one of someone (like Hands) who blew out early with such a workload.

It is entirely possible that certain athletes could handle this in those days, and others simply could not, just because of the way they were physically made.

Today, athletes are better-conditioned, stronger, etc. -- BUT, they are NOT trained to pitch this way. If they were, sure, they could throw 300 innings a year. But baseball just doesn't work that way any more. SHOULD it? That's a good argument, and we've had it here before and likely will again.

by Al on Dec 1, 2006 3:12 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

I agree....
That it is an argument worth having. AS a baseball fan, I hate that the game has changed so as to prevent the development of outstanding starting pitchers. The "stud" starting pitcher is a very important part of the attraction of the game. Once Maddux, Clemens and Glavine pass from the scene, there simply will be no more starting pitchers who will sell tickets. The role of the starting pitcher now is to throw 90 pitches, and then turn the game over to 4 or 5 one inning relievers. It's ridiculous, it's bad baseball, and it is not necessary.

by perseman on Dec 1, 2006 8:36 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Hear! Hear!
Finally someone who agrees with me! Thanks, Perseman. You made my day. For further commentary on this issue, check out my diary (if you haven't already) from a few days ago entitled Maddux & Clemens 1988 - A pitch-count diary.

I agree with all the points you just made, and you said them very well.

by danimal15 on Dec 2, 2006 8:23 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Your points are well taken.
However, I simply do not see this changing, do you?

by Al on Dec 3, 2006 9:33 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

MLB Logo
Was the MLB logo (still in use today) originally designed for that 100 year anniversary patch? I seem to remember it making its first appearance around that time.

(Although I can't remember any earlier time -- 1969 was my first year as a Cubs/baseball fan -- that logo always seemed very "early 70s" to me).

by JohnM on Nov 30, 2006 9:03 AM CST   0 recs

Yes...
... that was designed specifically for the 100th anniversary.

by Al on Nov 30, 2006 9:04 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

photos
Actually, you'll find in the late 50's & early 60's, many players on other NL teams, had their photos taken with Wrigley as a backdrop.  Hands was a real "money" pitcher for the Cubs.  Seems he always pitched the best against the tougher teams. I know Fergie always had problems with the Bucs & Mets, but I don't recall Hands struggling with them.

by KedzieKid on Nov 30, 2006 9:27 AM CST   0 recs

Baseball card photos
Most of the pictures in that era were either taken at spring training or in New York, Chicago, and Los Angeles.  I'm pretty sure they used those three cities because they had teams in both leagues, making it easier to get the players.

by 08 Cubs on Nov 30, 2006 10:06 AM CST   0 recs

Thanks for the write up
Besides Jenlins I cou;d not think of one pitcher of that era.
Man Law: Don't fruit the beer!!!

by Scott G F on Nov 30, 2006 10:25 AM CST   0 recs

Another from the '69 team
It's fun but still painful as they come up.  While he was a good pitcher for a few years, more than anything I remember Hands as an awful hitter.  

by rlpete on Nov 30, 2006 11:08 AM CST   0 recs

Coincidence
Of the three profiles which I contributed material, the first one runs on my 30th birthday.  That is a nice surprise.

I have greatly enjoyed these write-ups from all.  I also learned a lot doing them.  

by goody14 on Nov 30, 2006 12:57 PM CST   0 recs

today's your birthday?
well then HAPPY BIRTHDAY!
SINATRO!!!! Its music to my ears.

by flyball on Nov 30, 2006 1:40 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Must be close for Holtzman
Am sure he will pop up here soon after Hands somewhat similar altho Holtzman had more success after Cub tenure...and came back for a 2nd tour of duty in late 70s. I saw him pitch a shutout against Astros in WF.

Then may be a spell before any more boys from 69 start popping up...just my guesstimate.

Loved Kenny and that distinctive style whereby he turned his back to the hitter and twirled on the mound...did he always pitch that way from time he was a kid?? Certainly did later in career...never seen another lefty do it that way.

I suspect Hands just ran out of petrol it may not have been abuse or ramping up of his IP...look at Fergie and Holtzman both had long productive careers on a similar sked.

Leo sure milked him for all he had in 1969!!

by writerinwrigley on Nov 30, 2006 6:52 PM CST   0 recs

You really like...
... guessing here, don't you?

Hey, that's half the fun of it, wondering who'll come next.

You are correct about this: it will be a little while before the next '69er. Will let you all guess as to who the next one will be.

Was this the Holtzman shutout you're talking about? I remember that game well -- he had not been pitching particularly well, and suddenly threw one game where he was almost unhittable. It was a masterpiece.

by Al on Nov 30, 2006 9:11 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Hmmm
Holtzman could be the next '69 member to make it.  Could be Regan though too.  As Al as says, guessing is part of the fun.  

by rlpete on Nov 30, 2006 9:50 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

What is the story behind GM Holland?
In the profiles invovling players from the this era it seems that he made several keen trades.  Is he the GM who traded Lou Brock?

Why didn't the Cubs at least make it to the WS during this era?

by DudeVf1 on Nov 30, 2006 7:50 PM CST   0 recs

Wow...
... that's a question that books have been written about.

Holland did make some very shrewd deals -- getting Jenkins, Hundley, Hands, Beckert, among others.

He also made some horrendous ones, giving up Lou Brock, giving away Joe Niekro for nothing, among others.

by Al on Nov 30, 2006 9:08 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

It's a long story
For a short but good synopsis of 1969, I found this during my research for a yet to come member of the '69 team.  You may find it interesting.

http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/the-williams-santo-cubs-1966-1969/

by rlpete on Nov 30, 2006 9:45 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

I really enjoyed reading this.
I think this link had a link to the early/mid 60s years and they discussed Brock a little.  Boy, we had Brock (I keep wanting to say Patterson) and was it Beckert or Hubbs hitting 1-2 with OBPs of the .300 maybe even below .300 level?  What's even more crazy about that is if the Cubs valued Brock's power more then WTF do they bat him first?  At least Dusty was consistent in his ignorance with Patterson, i.e., they valued his speed and bat him leadoff, lol...

The big hole in CF for the 69 Cubs reminds me of the 2006 White Sox.  I also appreciated the discussion regarding Banks, those numbers were looking very Sosa like from 2004.

Reading about the Cubs from the 60s they seem like they could acquire talent or had eyes for talent.  Did they purge the system in the 70s because they didn't seem to have much coming up during that time.

by DudeVf1 on Dec 1, 2006 10:15 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Holland
Dude, Arizona Phil at The Cub Reporter did a fantastic summary of the Holland Years (and some excellent subsequent pieces) earlier this year.

by dvdmgsr on Dec 1, 2006 1:26 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Thanks!
This is a bit mroe straight forward and detailed, but still good stuff.  Too bad we didn't sign Darell Evans, what was that guy's nickname?  He seemed to play forever in the era that just preceeded heavy steroid longevity?

by DudeVf1 on Dec 1, 2006 10:06 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Why he was called Froggy
He was called Froggy because his pitching style was similar to Don Larsen's - who was also nicknamed Froggy.

by kthejoker on Dec 8, 2006 12:26 PM CST   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
My Tentative Cubs Top 20 Prospect List
Sandberg_small
2008 Regular Season Pitchers Review
Tommielogo_small
BCB Fantasy Baseball Champions
Sandberg_small
2008 Regular Season Hitters Review
Marmolade_small
thanks al

Recent FanPosts

P1_cub_fan_all_small
Whoever did this Cubs 08 VDO trib should get an Academy Award
Sandberg_small
Ryan Dempster
Small
2008 Playoffs or Expecting The Worst Sucks
Small
OK, AC sign, curses, what's next?
Small
Why did Billy Beane give us Harden?
Small
let's
Wincj9_small
Back in the Saddle
Doggie_small
Would things have been different if......
Small
If I Were Jim Hendry...

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Tribune Company kicks the tires of the San Diego Union-Tribune
OT: Jose Canseco busted again!
Bill Murray made a cameo during Saturday Night Live's Election Special on Thursday night. During...
The Walter E Smith Cubs montage that never had a chance going for it and thus may never air
Super Amazing Chicago Cubs Etch A Sketch (via etchedintime)
Water Pipe smashed in LA clubhouse
Marmol injured
What to do?
God Savoring Vast Array of Cubs-Cursing Options
My thoughts put into an image of words.

Go, Cubs.

Post_icon New FanShot All FanShots Carrot-mini

Google Ads


Editor-in-Chief

Yelloncard_small Al

Editorial Cartoonist

Toonmike_small toonmike

Photographer

Dsc_0139_small holy mackerel

ad

Site Meter