Bleed Cubbie Blue: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: The Boxing Bulletin for Boxing Fans!

The Top 100 Cubs Of All Time - #62 Leon Durham

Sports Illustrated's cover of June 11, 1984, featuring Durham and the Cubs

For a man who spent only seven full seasons in a Cub uniform, Leon Durham is part of more Cub lore than some others who played here for a decade or more.

The first time we became aware of him, and he entered that lore, was on his acquisition from the Cardinals on December 9, 1980 (along with the eminently-forgettable Ken Reitz and Tye Waller) for Bruce Sutter. Sutter was, of course, a great closer even then, and was traded by the Wrigleys -- the last major deal they ever made -- because a year before, he'd received what was at that time, the largest arbitration award in history, and the cash-poor Cubs couldn't afford that.

How much was that? $700,000.

My, how times change. That won't even buy you a backup infielder these days.

Durham, who had been highly touted as a Cardinal prospect (he was their first-round draft pick in 1976, out of Woodward High School in his hometown of Cincinnati, where he had been a high school All-American), was immediately installed as the Cubs' right fielder in 1981, one of the most miserable seasons in club history. His .290/.344/.460 numbers portended a greater future, as he was only 23 years old. Ten home runs didn't seem like much, but that was a strike year and Durham played in only 87 games, just a little more than half of a full "regular" season. He was given the predictable nickname "Bull".

Durham came into his own in 1982, hitting 22 HR and driving in 90 runs, while hitting .312/.388/.521 and stealing 28 bases. It was on July 4 of that year that he did something significant -- not in his career, as it was only one of 147 career HR, but in my life, as in a 7-2 Cub loss to the Cardinals in St. Louis, he hit the one and only game home-run ball I have in my collection, one that bounced to me in the right-field bleachers at old Busch Stadium.

Twenty-four years ago, and countless games in the Wrigley Field bleachers, and that's all I've got, just that one.

In '83 Durham was hurt and missed significant time and regressed; it appeared in 1982 that he was going to become one of the better power/speed/average hitters in the National League, but going into 1984 there were question marks.

And then an acquisition the Cubs made at the very end of spring training 1984 set in motion the events of that year, many of which swirled around Leon Durham. The Cubs acquired Gary Matthews and Bob Dernier from the Phillies, after losing thirteen straight games in spring training; Dallas Green rightfully "panicked" and made a bold move.

This had the snowball-effect of moving Keith Moreland, who might otherwise have played left field, to right field, and Durham to first base, leaving Bill Buckner, who had been the club's first baseman since 1977, to be a pinch-hitter, something he was ill-suited to do. That led to the trade of Buckner to the Red Sox in June for Dennis Eckersley, and of course, all of those acquisitions played key roles in the Cubs' division title year in 1984.

I'm not going to dwell here on the little ground ball that went under Durham's glove in the fifth game of the 1984 NLCS, or the rumors that Ryne Sandberg had accidentally spilled Gatorade on his glove before that fateful inning, making it "sticky" and thus Durham less able to field that ball properly. That play will forever be one of the things we'll always remember as one that prevented us from reaching the Promised Land.

Durham had three more reasonably productive years as the starting first baseman, though his RBI totals declined from 96 in that NL East title year to 75 and then 65 and then 63; his defense also suffered.

When he got off to a miserable (.218/.297/.403 in 45 games) start in 1988, Durham was quickly dispatched to the Reds in return for a mediocre middle reliever named Pat Perry. Rumors of drug use preceded the trade, and Durham quickly washed out of the majors, finishing with a 1-for-18 stint at age 31 with his original team, the Cardinals.

It's a shame, really; Durham had 143 career HR at the age of 29 and perhaps could have been the Cubs' first baseman well into the 1990's, and maybe hit 300 or so HR. After several years of trying to get back to the majors, he became a coach in the Angels' organization in 1996 and since 2001 has been the hitting coach at Triple-A Toledo, the Tigers' affiliate.

Durham is one of ten players to have worn uniform #10 since Ron Santo retired as a player (the whole list: Billy Grabarkewitz, Mike Sember, Dave Kingman, Durham, Lloyd McClendon, Luis Salazar, Steve Lake, Scott Bullett, and Terrell Lowery; manager Bruce Kimm also wore it in 2002, with Santo's blessing -- Kimm was the last to wear it before it was retired).

Leon Durham's career stats at baseball-reference.com

0 recs  |  Comment 49 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Nice write-up
Durham was one of my favorite Cubs in the 1980s -an exciting player who had a winning attitude and a great personality. Back then, a friend of mine, who was a young teen at the time, once ran into Durham and his wife at a Sears store, and Durham was very friendly to him, signing an autograph and chatting. That's the kind of guy he was.

Now this may be a rumor, but didn't Durham suffer from drug addiction later in his career? I seem to remember that being the possible reason for his quick decline at such a young age. If that was the case, it's good to see he's apparently put those problems behind him and is now once again making a positive contribution in baseball. He could end up being a fine major league coach one of these days.

by danimal15 on Dec 19, 2006 8:57 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

As I noted...
... there were drug rumors around Durham at the time he was traded, and he did have a precipitious decline just around the time he should have been having his best years.

But yes, he has turned his life around and by all accounts, is a well-respected coach in the Tigers organization.

by Al on Dec 19, 2006 9:04 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks
I must have missed that in your write-up.

by danimal15 on Dec 19, 2006 10:24 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

As I recall
the main issue was alcohol.  I believe that is what Durham revealed later, and he counsels players now about recovery from alcoholism.  The rumor was that Durham lived a healthy life at home, but when he traveled, would drink too much.  Many people in other professions who travel would admit to the same.  

Durham's home/road splits are consistent with the idea that he had trouble staying focused on the road.
Home (1864 AB): .296/.376/.531
Away (1723 AB): .255/.333/.415

Obviously, Wrigley was somewhat of a hitter's park, but this is still a large difference.  

The call of the Cub fan, c. 1893: "one long, ravaged, derisive yell...a cyclonic whoop!"

by zambranofan on Dec 19, 2006 10:50 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Bull
 One of the things people always forget is that Bull had a very good playoff series in '84.  He homered in game #4 to put them back in it, & he hit a 2-run shot in the first inning of the 5th game that, had things held up, would have been looked back upon as the big blow to get things started. He also made a leaping catch of a high bouncer in game #2 that helped save that game as well.

by KedzieKid on Dec 19, 2006 8:59 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

you're right
I remember now what a fine fielder Durham was at first base. That one play shouldn't overshadow everything else.

by danimal15 on Dec 19, 2006 9:02 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Good player
Very exciting when he was acquired.  Athletic, lots of skill.  One play should not define his career in Cub blue.  
Rommel, you magnificent bastard!! I READ YOUR BOOK!!

by BlueMike on Dec 19, 2006 9:47 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Sorry, but that's how...
It is.

One play can make or break a series, and history.

Think Alex Gonzalez. Bill Buckner. Leon Durham.  Not "clutch".

The "Great" players make them. How you could call him one of the 100 "Greatest Cubs" of all time is embarrassing. It speaks volumes for the overall dearth of quality talent in 100+ years that this guy would make Al's cut.

How ridiculous!

Beat Iowa in all sports. Go Northwestern!

by TheEman on Dec 19, 2006 11:46 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree that the word great
should have been left out of the list.  As Al's list makes clear, there are no where near 100 great Cubs.  But just because Durham made an error in a key spot doesn't mean he shouldn't be on whatever it is this list should be called.  Durham didn't come through in the clutch on one play?  Fine.  Who did in Cub history aside from a bunch of guys in the 1800s and forty or fifty  in thefirst half of the twentieth century?  No one on the '69 Cubs should be on there since they faded horribly in the clutch games of September.  Where was Ryno in the clutch after Durham had made his error when a tough hop he fields eight times out of ten times goes past him allowing the Padres to score a couple of more runs?  Where was Dawson in the clutch when he set a record for leaving men on base in the '89 NLCS?  Who should be on this list of the players I've watched since 1964?   Just who on this God forsaken team has been clutch when it really truly counted?  Durham stays.  Sorry he broke some people's hearts.  They all have in the end.

by TR on Dec 20, 2006 2:12 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Sutter arbitration
Just to put the $700,000 arbitration award to Sutter into perspective, that represented the entire Cub payroll just three years earlier, in 1977. And the Wrigley family wanted nothing to do with free agency. That's why they let go of other budding stars like Andre Thornton and Bill Madlock. Might have been the reason for trading Manny Trillo, as well.

by danimal15 on Dec 19, 2006 10:27 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Andre Thornton wasn't traded because
of free agency.  He hadn't played a combined season for the Cubs when he was dealt.  He was sent to Montreal because, as always, the Cubs needed pitching.  Instead, they got Steve Renko.  Oh, and Larry Biittner came over too because the Cubs could never have enough slow white guys with little if any power.

As an outspoken young black man, Madlock pissed off Wrigley by being outspoken about many things including what the two-time batting champ expected to get paid in the future.  He went to the Giants for the warning track pop of Bobby Murcer whose salary was actually higher than Madlock's.

For other Cubs traded for not living up to Wrigley's ideal of the Ernie Banks black player, see Bill North and Oscar Gamble.

by TR on Dec 19, 2006 12:17 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Andre Thornton comment should read
hadn't played a combined FULL season when he was dealt.

by TR on Dec 19, 2006 12:18 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks
Good stuff. I guess I was wrong about Thornton. But as you note, they did trade Madlock due in part to money issues. This was the beginning of the arbitration era, and they were afraid they'd lose a case to him, I suppose.

by danimal15 on Dec 19, 2006 12:41 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Actually...
... Thornton played parts of four seasons as a Cub, and had almost 700 at-bats, over 850 PA.

He was more or less the regular first baseman in 1975.

Still shouldn't have traded him. Dumb, dumb, dumb.

by Al on Dec 19, 2006 12:52 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Right you are, Al
That's what I get for depending on my rapidly failing mind instead of going to BaseballReference.  I thought 1974 was the year he played a handful of games and then played the majority of games at first for the Cubs in '75.  Actually he handled most of the 1B duties for both '74 and '75, although not exactly full-time.  

Still, his trade was not because he was looking at a massive payday.  They needed quality starting pitching and somehow ended up with Steve Renko.

Today's Dubs might have traded him for his damn insistance on getting on base a lot.  Gotta be up there hacking!!!

And Durham should be there despite "the play".  Buckner was a selfish player with limited time left in his legs.  Durham was an up and comer who could actually run a little, had way more power at a power position and had more range.  Plus, unlike some who have preceded him, Durham put together a more than one or two good seasons.

by TR on Dec 19, 2006 2:25 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Wrigley was a bigot
No question about it.  The trade for Bobby Murcer was one of the most idiotic moves ever made by this organization.  Murcer absolutely sucked in a Cub uniform and was mercifully sent back home to his beloved NY Yankees.  
Rommel, you magnificent bastard!! I READ YOUR BOOK!!

by BlueMike on Dec 19, 2006 2:08 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Murcer
That's a bit of an exaggeration. It's true he wasn't much help to the team in 1978, hitting just 9 homers. But in 1977, he hit 27 homers and had 89 RBI. That isn't exactly "sucking."

by danimal15 on Dec 19, 2006 3:12 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh yes, yes it was.
How well I remember this. On August 22, 1977, the Cubs beat the Giants 3-2 at Wrigley Field. Their record was 70-53, and they were 7.5 games out, in 2nd place. A significant deficit, but not an impossible one to make up.

Murcer homered in that game. He had 24 HR and 83 RBI after that game, on pace for a 30/100 season.

In the 39 remaining games he hit 3 HR and had 6 RBI (all 3 HR coming long after the Cubs were well out of contention, and all solo HR). His OPS dropped from .866 to .810, his BA from .280 to .265. He was basically invisible, and the Cubs went 11-28 in those 39 games -- not strictly because of Murcer, but that's about the worst 39 games I've seen a player of that supposed stature have.

by Al on Dec 19, 2006 3:20 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Hadn't heard the Gatorade rumor
Has Sandberg ever addressed it or talked about it?? What's the source for this? It's always something with the Cubs in a surreal sense--the black cat, the goat, Bartman.

Am afraid Durham's obit will mention the E in the first paragraph...that's how it goes. How much of a stand-up guy was he after that game in talking about it? I don't recall.

Lotta players in the 80's with Cubs and others linked to drugs..cocaine era affected a few won't mention names a few were Cubbies.
Didn't Grace's arrival play role in his being traded as well? No room for both...esp. with Durham on decline.

by writerinwrigley on Dec 19, 2006 11:48 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Maybe he'll....
manage or be the hitting coach for a World Series Cubs team. I wonder........

I thought Grace came after Palmiero, who didn't supposedly didn't have enough power....

Wow, what a combo L/R Palmiero and Sosa would have been through the 90's. A couple of Roiders bashing some homeruns. I like Grace and it's realistically impossible (statistical speculation aside) to know how much of a difference it would have made, but having two guys totalling more than 90 HR's for 5-7 years would have been hella exciting.

And who knows how many other guys they would've gotten on the juice. Maybe Prior and Wood would have started and all these injury problems would have just been "minor" issues.

Ahhh... we can dream, right?

My new motto: GO CUBS!!! They can't be any worse than last year. Right? <shrugs>

by tyger1147 on Dec 19, 2006 12:16 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

the juice is loose!
Maybe Prior and Wood would have started (juicing)

am i the only one who thinks that the problem with wood and prior may have been that they were juicing the whole time? I like em both, and i dont even think it would be a bad reflection of their character, but certainly pitchers have been using steroids for as long as hitters have. (and have you seen priors legs?)

That's where they got that Picasso.

by WrigleyCat on Dec 19, 2006 12:57 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I refer you to two books.
Ryno himself tells the story in his 1995 autobiography, "Second to Home".  (Or at least tells it through ghostwriter Barry Rozner).  Durham touches on it in the book "Banks to Sandberg to Grace" by our good friend, Carrie Muskat.  But according to them both, the Gatorade incident happened before the game during batting practice, and the incident was long forgotten by the seventh inning when the error occurred.    
"Don't complain to me about the stormy weather, boys. Just bring the ship into port." --Steve Stone, September 2004

by ctcoff99 on Dec 19, 2006 9:33 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

This is one guy I would have
ranked lower, just for that one (non) play. I know that's illogical, but I was still a new resident in SD and had to live with that series -- even now. I just don't care what happens to this guy. Garvey's home run becomes meaningless if he could field the damn ball. I would have preferred Bill Buckner at 1B, and boy -- would that have changed history if the Cubs kept him, and Durham isn't the 1Bman. History for 3 other teams might have changed...

by Smooth Jazz Man San Diego on Dec 19, 2006 12:51 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Odd, isn't it...
... that Buckner made a similar error in an even more critical postseason situation.

by Al on Dec 19, 2006 12:53 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I was thinking
the same thing, but I'm afraid to type that name out while within the city limits of Boston
keeping mediocrity at bay

by flyball on Dec 19, 2006 3:57 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

But Al, I will give Leon...
...this....since we actually were both at that game, (and since I steadfastly avoid ANY replays of that series -- I have been averting any glance when it pops up ANYWHERE, all I have is the memory) and I recall it to be a much harder play than Billy Buck's error-for-the-ages, don't you think?

Buckner let a barely-rolling ball through his legs...this was a line shot that took a harsh bounce -- and, remember the Pads shared the field with the Chargers, so the infield grass was 'iffy  but, still should have been fielded -- gatorade-soaked glove and all.  

by Smooth Jazz Man San Diego on Dec 19, 2006 10:00 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Funny you should mention...
... replays of that series.

I taped all five games of the 1984 NLCS. Still have the tapes.

I have never watched any of them.

by Al on Dec 20, 2006 4:10 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Funny thing --
so did I. I still have the first 2 games. I have never watched them. I've since thrown away 3 through 5. Not taped over -- thrown away.

by Smooth Jazz Man San Diego on Dec 20, 2006 9:37 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Huge May 1984
In my opinion, Durham's career was made by a huge May of 1984.  He was named Player of the Month that month when he had an OPS of 1.133 and 34 rbi's.  His highest OPS for any other month in his career was 1.013 and after that he never had more than 22 rbi's in a month which is the only other time he broke 20.  His whole 1984 season, the best of his career, was made by that one month.

by Tarzan Joe on Dec 19, 2006 4:41 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

True.
And, it was right after that, that the SI cover depicted here appeared.

by Al on Dec 19, 2006 5:24 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Durham ...
... is one of those guys about whom I say, "He played seven full seasons with the Cubs?  Where was I?"

'Course those were my collge years.

... It's not the hangin' that I mind / It's the layin' in the jail so long ....

by kjk on Dec 19, 2006 5:37 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

1984
I wonder where some of the other stars of 1984 are going to end up on this list, namely:

Keith Moreland, Rick Sutcliffe, Ryne Sandberg, Jody Davis. Lee Smith. Gary Matthews.

Sandberg will be in the top-10, or perhaps even the top-5, and Sutcliffe should be in the top-50, but we must be getting close to Moreland and Davis, assuming they've made the list. Smith has to be in the top-50, but will Matthews make the list? He really only had one good season with the Cubs, but he was such an essential part of the 1984 team, I think he deserves a spot.

So far, I think Cey, Eckersley and Durham are the only ones listed.

by danimal15 on Dec 19, 2006 5:51 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Correct...
... on ALL counts.

Now, I'll let you figure out what that means.

by Al on Dec 19, 2006 6:57 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

re: Correct...
I hadn't thought about this, but if Moreland is ahead of Durham, you may have some 'splainin to do.

by Tracy on Dec 20, 2006 9:07 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Sosa
And once again, I'm wondering where Sosa will end up. If you discount his cheating and the huge offensive surge all around baseball that he benefited from, he'd have to be in the top-15, perhaps the top-10. What other Cub has had a 60-home run season? None.

As for Moreland vs. Durham, that's a good question. If Moreland is on this list, he'd better show up soon, because although he was a solid player for many years, there's no way in my book he should be in the top-50 Cubs of all time, and certainly he shouldn't be so far ahead of Jose Cardenal or even Derek Lee.

by danimal15 on Dec 20, 2006 9:26 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Matthews doesn't belong
One good season and two ok seasons shouldn't get him this low.  He didn't make my list.  I think Moreland should be coming up very soon.

by rlpete on Dec 20, 2006 11:39 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Moreland vs. Durham...
Moreland was the sparkplug for that 1984 team, most people forget about that. In fact, Durham was booed early in the '84 season because the fans at Wrigley wanted Buckner back at first. Durham silenced his critics with his bat, the best way to make a statement, on the field.
Moreland, despite his trade demands while he rode the bench, early in '84, came on strong.

In August of '84, when a few of the other Cubs were slowing down offensively, it was Moreland that seemed to be clutch. He had a .529 average over the first week of August, he hit 3 or 4 homers, 15 RBIs, and chipped in game-winning hits and game-tying hits. Who can forget the chants of "Keith, Keith" after he hit the game winner in the first game of a cruical series against the rival Mets? Or how his 3-run homer in the 5th inning, the next game led the Cubs to an 8-6 victory over the Mets. That's also the game where Ed Lynch beaned Moreland, and he charged the mound, resulting in a bench clearing brawl.

Yet, the best Moreland moment, might have been versus the Padres in game 1 of the NLCS...sinking line drive over Sandberg's head with the bases juiced...and out of nowhere comes Keith Moreland diving with all his might and coming up with a catch just before the ball nearly hit the grass. He preserved that 13-0 shutout.

by cubby23 on Dec 21, 2006 3:13 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Great memories
Yeah - I'd forgotten how good Moreland was that first week of August. The problem is, I was away at overnight camp in Michigan at the time and missed that whole stretch. What a waste. I do remember the Mets' coach trying to climb into the stands to get at a heckler.

by danimal15 on Dec 21, 2006 10:38 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Just a hunch
It means Jody Davis, Ryne Sandberg, Rick Sutcliff (Mel Hall & Joe Carter), Steve Trout, Lee Smith, Gary Matthews, Larry Bowa, Dick Ruthven, Gary Woods (add him if only for his contribution to the song "Men in Blue") are yet to come, lol!

Actually if the entire '84 team makes it into the top 50 I'd make no apologies, that season just was something unexpected and special.

by cubby23 on Dec 21, 2006 3:18 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

A second-guess on the Bull
Not comparing stats or even looking at them...I know Durham put up some nice numbers.

But in my mind, Jose Cardenal was a superior and more important member of the Cub teams he played on that Durham was for those Cubs...that one month was sensational, the rest was just solid.

I'd flop those two on the list on demote Durham because of his huge flub in the clutch...admittedly, Cardenal did not play on any winning (postseason) teams but I'd submit the Cubs of '84 might have done just as well with another solid 1B. Maybe that's slighting Durham.

I do think Dallas Green's bold moves as cited by Al were key, key, and no GM since has made such master strokes (Hendry's off-season aside, and it's all through free agency which is just spending, not dealing players). I wish the Cubs had kept him on the job much longer he was good at building and developing with his scouts.

Maybe if I studied the Nos. more closely I'd be more pro-Durham but can't see beyond the E-3. I think that '84 team was our best shot of the modern era to do something special and he (along with Frey, Lee Smith and others) spoiled it in San Diego that fatal weekend.

I'm not saying they would have beat Detroit which was hot stuff that year but surely we were better than the Pods.

 

by writerinwrigley on Dec 19, 2006 8:24 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

'84 Cubs certainly better than the Padres
Whether or not we would have won the series -- kinda questionable. But it would have been such fun, with the '1945 rematch.' A great angle. Instead, (And, I went to the damn games -- never thought I'd have to use the tickets) it was a boring, one-sided crappy series. And I still wore my Cubs cap the first game. Pretty stupid thing to do. By Game 2, I corrected that mistake.

by Smooth Jazz Man San Diego on Dec 20, 2006 9:43 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Sigh.
I had tickets not only to the WS games in Chicago, but to what would have been games six and seven in Detroit.

Can you imagine how much Durham would have loved pounding balls into that RF upper deck in Detroit?

by Al on Dec 20, 2006 9:55 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Two memories of Leon Durham.
First, he hit a home run (along with Jody Davis) in the first Cubs game I ever went to in 1984, at the age of seven.  I've been hooked ever since.  I also remember shedding some tears for him a few months later after Game 5.  Second, I remember a game a year or two later, probably '85 or '86, in which Durham had missed maybe a week to attend to family matters after the death of his brother.  In his first game back, he hit a game-winning home run at Wrigley Field and he gave the fans an emotional curtain call after getting back to the dugout.  Not sure how or why I remember that, but I do.  Good ballplayer.  A guy a remember fondly as a kid.  
"Don't complain to me about the stormy weather, boys. Just bring the ship into port." --Steve Stone, September 2004

by ctcoff99 on Dec 19, 2006 9:42 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

My Homerun Ball
I got a homerun ball hit by Gary Gaetti, it was a line drive shot into the left field bleachers. What a thrill, I was sure nobody was going to catch it and the ball just happened to bounce my way.  The Cubs lost badly that day, the Rockies scored in every inning and I believe that was some kind of record at the time. Sosa hit a homer earlier in the game, but the game was over by the time Gaetti hit his.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/CHN/CHN199905050.shtml

"Harlem Furniture......You'll like our style!"

by Imtrejo on Dec 20, 2006 3:57 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Gaetti game
Some pitching the Cubs got that day. I don't even recognize two of the Cub pitchers' names - Woodall and Barker. Don't remember them at all. 1999 was such a disappointing year, coming after the magical 1998 season.

Interesting that the Rockies let Pedro Astacio throw 133 pitches in a 13-6 game. It's nice that people weren't so hung up on "pitch counts" back then. Only 7 years ago, but so much has changed.

by danimal15 on Dec 20, 2006 11:49 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Bull's a little high on the list.
I liked Leon Durham as a Cub, he provided some explosive home runs onto Sheffield Avenue, something that's often rare to see at Wrigley.

He was underrated defensively, but he was not Mark Grace superior.

I have some conflicted feelings about that game 5 in San Diego, but what Cub fan doesn't? (If only MLB had switched to the 7 game format a year earlier)! It's strange how my lasting memories of Durham always seem to be tied to that '84 team. I can probably say the same for Moreland, Dernier, Matthews, Cey, Jody, and a few others. That team was just so much fun.

by cubby23 on Dec 20, 2006 4:23 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

MLB Could have
Gone 2-2-1 with the NLCS. But no, they adopted this stupid 2-3 set-up. How the hell could this have been a home field advantage for the team that earned it? The Cubs should have had 3 home games, in a 5 game set -- as we now see in the Divisional Series.

Bad friggin' luck.

by Smooth Jazz Man San Diego on Dec 20, 2006 9:48 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon
Start posting about the Cubs »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Sb_small
Ask BCB - Wacky Trade Proposals
Small
Reversal of opinion...Bradley will not be moved
Yelloncard_small
Baseball Picture Puzzles Overflow 1
Derrick_rose_poster_by_rokasm_small
You know you want him, Get it done Jim!
Yelloncard_small
Baseball Player Picture Puzzles

Recent FanPosts

Small
Time to get yelled at...
Cubs_small
Cubs HR Over/Under
Cubs_ying_yang_small
OT Aged Stadiums
Small
Here's a thought
Jake_fox_small
25th Annual Cubs Convention
Bucky_small
OT: Annual Thanksgiving  Thread
Dscn2381_small
Cubs 2010 2B and "the L word"
Cubswin712_small
Is there anyway we trade some of our high-priced players?
Yelloncard_small
Milton Bradley Named NL "LVP" By Joe Posnanski

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Would you blow up the farm system for Halladay?
FanGraphs calls Grabow a "waste of cash."
Fangraphs hasn't given up on Geo, should you?
Baseball America's Top 10 Cubs Prospects
An animated tribute to the no-hitter that Pirates pitcher Dock Ellis threw on June 12, 1970. Simply...

Recent FanShots

Mike Kiley insults Wrigley and Cubs fans
Muskat on Fuld : even DUMBER than usual
Free Agency Blunders
"I Want Mark DeRosa"
White Sox Sign Vizquel To One-Year Deal
Cubs' next major hire: marketing guru
Zambrano attends Bears game
Cubs install sign boards in bleachers to block Horseshoe Casino (Budweiser) building...
This one is for you sabermetricians
A Chicagoan, Part Of Cardinals Ownership Group, Dies

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

It Is Only...

Cubs By The Numbers

Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.

Click here to order your copy, available now!

SPONSORS

Recent Stories in Ticket Exchanges

Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: Cubs Convention 2010
Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: General 2009 Ticket Exchange
Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: September 29-October 4 Homestand

Managing Editor

Yelloncard_small Al

Editorial Cartoonist

Toonmike_small toonmike

Contributors

Dsc_0139_small holy mackerel

100px-boisehawkscaplogo_small Josh77

Small shawndgoldman