The Top 100 Cubs Of All Time - #62 Leon Durham

Sports Illustrated's cover of June 11, 1984, featuring Durham and the Cubs
For a man who spent only seven full seasons in a Cub uniform, Leon Durham is part of more Cub lore than some others who played here for a decade or more.
The first time we became aware of him, and he entered that lore, was on his acquisition from the Cardinals on December 9, 1980 (along with the eminently-forgettable Ken Reitz and Tye Waller) for Bruce Sutter. Sutter was, of course, a great closer even then, and was traded by the Wrigleys -- the last major deal they ever made -- because a year before, he'd received what was at that time, the largest arbitration award in history, and the cash-poor Cubs couldn't afford that.
How much was that? $700,000.
My, how times change. That won't even buy you a backup infielder these days.
Durham, who had been highly touted as a Cardinal prospect (he was their first-round draft pick in 1976, out of Woodward High School in his hometown of Cincinnati, where he had been a high school All-American), was immediately installed as the Cubs' right fielder in 1981, one of the most miserable seasons in club history. His .290/.344/.460 numbers portended a greater future, as he was only 23 years old. Ten home runs didn't seem like much, but that was a strike year and Durham played in only 87 games, just a little more than half of a full "regular" season. He was given the predictable nickname "Bull".
Durham came into his own in 1982, hitting 22 HR and driving in 90 runs, while hitting .312/.388/.521 and stealing 28 bases. It was on July 4 of that year that he did something significant -- not in his career, as it was only one of 147 career HR, but in my life, as in a 7-2 Cub loss to the Cardinals in St. Louis, he hit the one and only game home-run ball I have in my collection, one that bounced to me in the right-field bleachers at old Busch Stadium.
Twenty-four years ago, and countless games in the Wrigley Field bleachers, and that's all I've got, just that one.
In '83 Durham was hurt and missed significant time and regressed; it appeared in 1982 that he was going to become one of the better power/speed/average hitters in the National League, but going into 1984 there were question marks.
And then an acquisition the Cubs made at the very end of spring training 1984 set in motion the events of that year, many of which swirled around Leon Durham. The Cubs acquired Gary Matthews and Bob Dernier from the Phillies, after losing thirteen straight games in spring training; Dallas Green rightfully "panicked" and made a bold move.
This had the snowball-effect of moving Keith Moreland, who might otherwise have played left field, to right field, and Durham to first base, leaving Bill Buckner, who had been the club's first baseman since 1977, to be a pinch-hitter, something he was ill-suited to do. That led to the trade of Buckner to the Red Sox in June for Dennis Eckersley, and of course, all of those acquisitions played key roles in the Cubs' division title year in 1984.
I'm not going to dwell here on the little ground ball that went under Durham's glove in the fifth game of the 1984 NLCS, or the rumors that Ryne Sandberg had accidentally spilled Gatorade on his glove before that fateful inning, making it "sticky" and thus Durham less able to field that ball properly. That play will forever be one of the things we'll always remember as one that prevented us from reaching the Promised Land.
Durham had three more reasonably productive years as the starting first baseman, though his RBI totals declined from 96 in that NL East title year to 75 and then 65 and then 63; his defense also suffered.
When he got off to a miserable (.218/.297/.403 in 45 games) start in 1988, Durham was quickly dispatched to the Reds in return for a mediocre middle reliever named Pat Perry. Rumors of drug use preceded the trade, and Durham quickly washed out of the majors, finishing with a 1-for-18 stint at age 31 with his original team, the Cardinals.
It's a shame, really; Durham had 143 career HR at the age of 29 and perhaps could have been the Cubs' first baseman well into the 1990's, and maybe hit 300 or so HR. After several years of trying to get back to the majors, he became a coach in the Angels' organization in 1996 and since 2001 has been the hitting coach at Triple-A Toledo, the Tigers' affiliate.
Durham is one of ten players to have worn uniform #10 since Ron Santo retired as a player (the whole list: Billy Grabarkewitz, Mike Sember, Dave Kingman, Durham, Lloyd McClendon, Luis Salazar, Steve Lake, Scott Bullett, and Terrell Lowery; manager Bruce Kimm also wore it in 2002, with Santo's blessing -- Kimm was the last to wear it before it was retired).
49 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Nice write-up
Now this may be a rumor, but didn't Durham suffer from drug addiction later in his career? I seem to remember that being the possible reason for his quick decline at such a young age. If that was the case, it's good to see he's apparently put those problems behind him and is now once again making a positive contribution in baseball. He could end up being a fine major league coach one of these days.
As I noted...
But yes, he has turned his life around and by all accounts, is a well-respected coach in the Tigers organization.
As I recall
Durham's home/road splits are consistent with the idea that he had trouble staying focused on the road.
Home (1864 AB): .296/.376/.531
Away (1723 AB): .255/.333/.415
Obviously, Wrigley was somewhat of a hitter's park, but this is still a large difference.
Bull
you're right
Good player
by BlueMike on Dec 19, 2006 9:47 AM CST reply actions
Sorry, but that's how...
One play can make or break a series, and history.
Think Alex Gonzalez. Bill Buckner. Leon Durham. Not "clutch".
The "Great" players make them. How you could call him one of the 100 "Greatest Cubs" of all time is embarrassing. It speaks volumes for the overall dearth of quality talent in 100+ years that this guy would make Al's cut.
How ridiculous!
by TheEman on Dec 19, 2006 11:46 PM CST up reply actions
I agree that the word great
by TR on Dec 20, 2006 2:12 AM CST up reply actions
Sutter arbitration
Andre Thornton wasn't traded because
As an outspoken young black man, Madlock pissed off Wrigley by being outspoken about many things including what the two-time batting champ expected to get paid in the future. He went to the Giants for the warning track pop of Bobby Murcer whose salary was actually higher than Madlock's.
For other Cubs traded for not living up to Wrigley's ideal of the Ernie Banks black player, see Bill North and Oscar Gamble.
by TR on Dec 19, 2006 12:17 PM CST up reply actions
Andre Thornton comment should read
by TR on Dec 19, 2006 12:18 PM CST up reply actions
Thanks
Actually...
He was more or less the regular first baseman in 1975.
Still shouldn't have traded him. Dumb, dumb, dumb.
Right you are, Al
Still, his trade was not because he was looking at a massive payday. They needed quality starting pitching and somehow ended up with Steve Renko.
Today's Dubs might have traded him for his damn insistance on getting on base a lot. Gotta be up there hacking!!!
And Durham should be there despite "the play". Buckner was a selfish player with limited time left in his legs. Durham was an up and comer who could actually run a little, had way more power at a power position and had more range. Plus, unlike some who have preceded him, Durham put together a more than one or two good seasons.
by TR on Dec 19, 2006 2:25 PM CST up reply actions
Wrigley was a bigot
by BlueMike on Dec 19, 2006 2:08 PM CST up reply actions
Murcer
Oh yes, yes it was.
Murcer homered in that game. He had 24 HR and 83 RBI after that game, on pace for a 30/100 season.
In the 39 remaining games he hit 3 HR and had 6 RBI (all 3 HR coming long after the Cubs were well out of contention, and all solo HR). His OPS dropped from .866 to .810, his BA from .280 to .265. He was basically invisible, and the Cubs went 11-28 in those 39 games -- not strictly because of Murcer, but that's about the worst 39 games I've seen a player of that supposed stature have.
Hadn't heard the Gatorade rumor
Am afraid Durham's obit will mention the E in the first paragraph...that's how it goes. How much of a stand-up guy was he after that game in talking about it? I don't recall.
Lotta players in the 80's with Cubs and others linked to drugs..cocaine era affected a few won't mention names a few were Cubbies.
Didn't Grace's arrival play role in his being traded as well? No room for both...esp. with Durham on decline.
by writerinwrigley on Dec 19, 2006 11:48 AM CST reply actions
Maybe he'll....
I thought Grace came after Palmiero, who didn't supposedly didn't have enough power....
Wow, what a combo L/R Palmiero and Sosa would have been through the 90's. A couple of Roiders bashing some homeruns. I like Grace and it's realistically impossible (statistical speculation aside) to know how much of a difference it would have made, but having two guys totalling more than 90 HR's for 5-7 years would have been hella exciting.
And who knows how many other guys they would've gotten on the juice. Maybe Prior and Wood would have started and all these injury problems would have just been "minor" issues.
Ahhh... we can dream, right?
the juice is loose!
am i the only one who thinks that the problem with wood and prior may have been that they were juicing the whole time? I like em both, and i dont even think it would be a bad reflection of their character, but certainly pitchers have been using steroids for as long as hitters have. (and have you seen priors legs?)
by WrigleyCat on Dec 19, 2006 12:57 PM CST up reply actions
I refer you to two books.
This is one guy I would have
by Smooth Jazz Man San Diego on Dec 19, 2006 12:51 PM CST reply actions
Odd, isn't it...
I was thinking
But Al, I will give Leon...
Buckner let a barely-rolling ball through his legs...this was a line shot that took a harsh bounce -- and, remember the Pads shared the field with the Chargers, so the infield grass was 'iffy but, still should have been fielded -- gatorade-soaked glove and all.
by Smooth Jazz Man San Diego on Dec 19, 2006 10:00 PM CST up reply actions
Funny you should mention...
I taped all five games of the 1984 NLCS. Still have the tapes.
I have never watched any of them.
Funny thing --
by Smooth Jazz Man San Diego on Dec 20, 2006 9:37 PM CST up reply actions
Huge May 1984
Durham ...
'Course those were my collge years.
1984
Keith Moreland, Rick Sutcliffe, Ryne Sandberg, Jody Davis. Lee Smith. Gary Matthews.
Sandberg will be in the top-10, or perhaps even the top-5, and Sutcliffe should be in the top-50, but we must be getting close to Moreland and Davis, assuming they've made the list. Smith has to be in the top-50, but will Matthews make the list? He really only had one good season with the Cubs, but he was such an essential part of the 1984 team, I think he deserves a spot.
So far, I think Cey, Eckersley and Durham are the only ones listed.
re: Correct...
by Tracy on Dec 20, 2006 9:07 AM CST up reply actions
Sosa
As for Moreland vs. Durham, that's a good question. If Moreland is on this list, he'd better show up soon, because although he was a solid player for many years, there's no way in my book he should be in the top-50 Cubs of all time, and certainly he shouldn't be so far ahead of Jose Cardenal or even Derek Lee.
Matthews doesn't belong
Moreland vs. Durham...
Moreland, despite his trade demands while he rode the bench, early in '84, came on strong.
In August of '84, when a few of the other Cubs were slowing down offensively, it was Moreland that seemed to be clutch. He had a .529 average over the first week of August, he hit 3 or 4 homers, 15 RBIs, and chipped in game-winning hits and game-tying hits. Who can forget the chants of "Keith, Keith" after he hit the game winner in the first game of a cruical series against the rival Mets? Or how his 3-run homer in the 5th inning, the next game led the Cubs to an 8-6 victory over the Mets. That's also the game where Ed Lynch beaned Moreland, and he charged the mound, resulting in a bench clearing brawl.
Yet, the best Moreland moment, might have been versus the Padres in game 1 of the NLCS...sinking line drive over Sandberg's head with the bases juiced...and out of nowhere comes Keith Moreland diving with all his might and coming up with a catch just before the ball nearly hit the grass. He preserved that 13-0 shutout.
Great memories
Just a hunch
Actually if the entire '84 team makes it into the top 50 I'd make no apologies, that season just was something unexpected and special.
A second-guess on the Bull
But in my mind, Jose Cardenal was a superior and more important member of the Cub teams he played on that Durham was for those Cubs...that one month was sensational, the rest was just solid.
I'd flop those two on the list on demote Durham because of his huge flub in the clutch...admittedly, Cardenal did not play on any winning (postseason) teams but I'd submit the Cubs of '84 might have done just as well with another solid 1B. Maybe that's slighting Durham.
I do think Dallas Green's bold moves as cited by Al were key, key, and no GM since has made such master strokes (Hendry's off-season aside, and it's all through free agency which is just spending, not dealing players). I wish the Cubs had kept him on the job much longer he was good at building and developing with his scouts.
Maybe if I studied the Nos. more closely I'd be more pro-Durham but can't see beyond the E-3. I think that '84 team was our best shot of the modern era to do something special and he (along with Frey, Lee Smith and others) spoiled it in San Diego that fatal weekend.
I'm not saying they would have beat Detroit which was hot stuff that year but surely we were better than the Pods.
by writerinwrigley on Dec 19, 2006 8:24 PM CST reply actions
'84 Cubs certainly better than the Padres
by Smooth Jazz Man San Diego on Dec 20, 2006 9:43 PM CST up reply actions
Two memories of Leon Durham.
My Homerun Ball
http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/CHN/CHN199905050.shtml
Gaetti game
Interesting that the Rockies let Pedro Astacio throw 133 pitches in a 13-6 game. It's nice that people weren't so hung up on "pitch counts" back then. Only 7 years ago, but so much has changed.
Bull's a little high on the list.
He was underrated defensively, but he was not Mark Grace superior.
I have some conflicted feelings about that game 5 in San Diego, but what Cub fan doesn't? (If only MLB had switched to the 7 game format a year earlier)! It's strange how my lasting memories of Durham always seem to be tied to that '84 team. I can probably say the same for Moreland, Dernier, Matthews, Cey, Jody, and a few others. That team was just so much fun.
MLB Could have
Bad friggin' luck.
by Smooth Jazz Man San Diego on Dec 20, 2006 9:48 PM CST up reply actions

by 


















