White Sox trade McCarthy
The White Sox, for some reason, traded Brandon McCarthy to the Rangers for top left prospect John Danks, and Nick Masset, another pitching prospect.
This trade would, to me, make a lot of sense if Williams was sending Garland out for two young, cheap, talented pitchers. But why trade McCarthy, who is cheap for a long time yet, for two pitchers who haven't had the success of McCarthy at the MLB level.
http://www.thebaseballcube.com/players/D/John-Danks.shtml
http://www.thebaseballcube.com/players/M/Nick-Masset.shtml
i know Danks is highly regarded, but neither player has minor league numbers that blow you away, though Danks is very young for a pitcher at AAA.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
48 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
sorry
Now...
Supposedly they dealt Garcia so McCarthy could go into the rotation. Dealing him for prospects makes no sense at all, unless Williams has another deal up his sleeve.
Strange indeed!
McCarthy was not good out of the pen. He had only a few starts last season. As much as I hoped and expected McCarthy to do well this 07 season, he was not a lock or guarantee to perform well all season. I've always been a bit concerned about his durability for 30 starts considering his build. It seems that for all KW's talk about McCarthy being "untouchable" they didn't show much faith in him last season, as they were very slow to insert him into the rotation, even as Buehrle struggled, Contreras was hurt, etc.
If I were a Cubs fan, I'd be wondering why the Cubs could not have picked up McCarthy from the Sox given the price.
Here's the reason...
If Hendry had approached Williams, the first guy Williams would have asked for would have been Rich Hill, which would have made any such deal pointless from a Cub standpoint.
That would explain it then...
In another year...perhaps...
A full year in the minors for Marshall, Marmol, Mateo, et al, and I think our pitching will be regarded much higher by next offseason so long as they stay healthy.
by theprognosticator on Dec 23, 2006 3:33 PM CST up reply actions
My thought process
some other prospects were involved with the White Sox making the better end of the deal on the minor prospects involved
but for the most part this has been a REALLY REALLY interesting offseason for the white sox, they've now dealt Garcia and McCarthy to leave the rotation with: Contreras, Buehrle, Vazquez, Garland, and Haeger
Buehrle is a FA at the end of the season and has expressed his desire to pitch for the Cardinals, his hometown team.
So they've gotten there surplus of 7 quality starting pitching options down to 5 and in the process re-stocked their farm system with some higher level pitching
the question becomes in a market starved for SP, could they have gotten more? Gio Gonzalez and John Danks are two of the top 25-30 pitching prospects in baseball but at the same time they essentially have dealt two-for-two with pitching unless a guy like Buccholtz turns it around
The key with this is the White Sox have shed salary committments with Garcia this season and then McCarthy further along in the arbitration period than Danks or Gonzalez so he gets control of them longer
Plus with Dye as an impending FA and Crede as well, it appears the White Sox are trying to make the transition on the fly into a rebuilding process
the question is did they close their window too early? or is it still open this season?
With the Indians and Twins loaded for what appears to be years to come and with the Tigers in a similar situation this off-season appeared to be a preemptive strike against the rebuilding process to catch up to those teams in the long term
i think it was a good strategy, unfortunately i'm not sure Williams took enough advantage in this market thats so starved for pitching
by DartmouthCubsFan on Dec 23, 2006 3:17 PM CST reply actions
i meant Floyd
by DartmouthCubsFan on Dec 23, 2006 3:20 PM CST up reply actions
I'm bearish on the Tigers and Twins...
The Tigers played well above themselves last year and I think it entirely possible that they end up with no more than 85 wins in 07.
The Indians, while marvelously talented, have yet to put it together, and until they do, I'm not granting them anything they haven't earned.
So, imo, the White Sox, until the McCarthy trade, were the prohibitive favorite to take the AL Central again. Now, they could very well still take the division, even with McCarthy no longer a part of the team, but this definitely makes it harder for them.
And I just don't see the reason for this move. McCarthy is controlled for the next five years, he's ready now and has proven he can be an adequate pitcher. Danks, while talented, has not blown anyone away with his minor league numbers as of yet and might not be a factor until 2008 at the earliest. And even then, will he be better than McCarthy? Doubtful.
Unless there are other moves brewing because of this one, this is puzzling. And perhaps we as envious fans of our successful rivals are too quick to believe that their GM, even when he does something that at first and second glance looks foolish, actually has something brilliant up his sleeve, or somehow sees things nobody else does.
Perhaps Kenny Williams isn't as smart as he's been given credit for. This seems like a move based on a hunch, and a belief that Danks will be something special, as the numbers certainly don't suggest that he will be better than McCarthy at this point. This looks like a move from the gut.
But anyway you slice it, we're not going to be tell for sure until 2008 or 2009 whether or not Danks was worth it. The only thing certain right now is that the move has weakened the White Sox in the short-term, in a division very winnable for them, while guaranteeing nothing in the future.
by theprognosticator on Dec 23, 2006 3:31 PM CST up reply actions
the question is
if he is then it only hurts their depth of pitching not their current 5
Haeger's AAA numbers were very impressive for a 23 yr old knuckleballer
by DartmouthCubsFan on Dec 23, 2006 3:34 PM CST up reply actions
never trust a knuckleballer...
by theprognosticator on Dec 23, 2006 3:39 PM CST up reply actions
One of my all-time favorites...
71-75, Wood's IP/ERA:
334/1.91
376/2.51
359/3.46
320/3.60
291/4.11
your point being?
Charlie Haeger could be a great pitcher in the making, he could also be the second coming of Steve Sparks. Either way, I'd rather have McCarthy starting.
by theprognosticator on Dec 23, 2006 3:56 PM CST up reply actions
NEVER
If it were up to me, I'd keep Haeger in the pen, as they did last season.
dear god in heaven...
Okay, just so you won't fly off the handle here, and I mean that figuratively, not literally, by and large I do not believe knucklers are trustworthy as pitchers, certainly not over pitchers like McCarthy and that replacing McCarthy with Haeger is a significant and largely unnecessary risk.
by theprognosticator on Dec 23, 2006 4:22 PM CST up reply actions
He didn't "catch" you...
The point is, if I can be allowed to interpret you, that if a knuckleballer doesn't have his knucler, he's SOL for the game. Whereas if Zambrano, Satana or Greg Maddux don't have their dominant pitches, if they're good enough, they can fall back on something else.
Considering we're talking abouta 23 year old prospect, I think "Never trust a knuckleballer" is a perfectly apt statement.
Just saying.
(Sorry, I like to interject myself sometimes.)
Easy...
Further, I said recent knuckleballers have been unreliable AND I clearly said that I'd prefer Haeger in the bullpen.
Peace.
What's fascinating here
by 26.2cubfan on Dec 23, 2006 5:14 PM CST up reply actions
Ken "The Gambler" Williams
McCarthy was the favorite for the 5th spot in the rotation before the trade, but the Sox were clear that it was open to whomever won the spot.
KW is fearless in his trades, for better or worse.
Doc
Personally, I would have rather gotten some OF help for McCarthy. I'm not sold on McCarthy as he has "longball-itis" and it's due to his stuff being above average, not excellent. He's a good pitcher and can mix well. But he's not a #1-type.
Time will tell with this one. Williams does have some serious stones, though.
Teeth gritted...
Even at this point though the McCarthy deal is ok with me.
Last night I participated in a discussion with Trib baseball columnist, Phil Rogers. In Rogers column he said that McCarthy is a "polished workhorse." McCarthy MAY become a MLB workhorse but a 23 yr old with 150 IP in 2 yrs - is he polished. At this point, while McCarthy is farther along than Danks, McCarthy is not a proven starter let along a workhorse.
When I recall some of the other pitchers KW has traded for it makes me a bit nervous (see Kip Wells for Ritchie and Ray Durham for Jon Adkins trades) but at this point I'll trust KW and hope for the best.
Just an odd deal...
Do they really feel strong about Gavin Floyd or Charlie Haeger being able to step into the #5 slot? Or are they about to make a push for Barry Zito?
If I'm a Sox fan, Kenny Williams is burning up a lot of the currency he earned from 2005.
Just think of the howling in Cubdom if Hendry had made this deal...
by theprognosticator on Dec 23, 2006 3:18 PM CST reply actions
Zito?
As it is though, the Sox won't be signing Zito. Reinsdorf has been resolute about not signing pitchers to more than 3 year contracts. I can't imagine Zito is looking for a 3 year deal. Plus IIRC Zito is represented by Boras, which makes it even less likely that the Sox will sign him.
I would have preferred McCarthy in the rotation to the question they have in his place now. However, it's not as though McCarthy was witout question either as he's never gone thru a season as a MLB starter.
It's an odd trade
That said, I'm sure they would have rather traded Garland or Vasquez but it makes you wonder. Do they know something about McCarthy that they aren't telling? Or maybe they think Haeger is the real deal? Either way, I doubt McCarthy was going to be one of their two or three best starters next year and I'm guessing that Haeger can do an adequate job in the rotation, so barring an injury they shouldn't be a great deal weaker next year because of this.
Balls of steel.....
I really like what he has done with his team. If you look at their Minor League reviews, the talent was thin at best. He has stocked the system with the some power arms. IMHO, he is doing the smart thing in restocking on the fly. Too many teams let things get out of hand before they begin a transition. Even though he lost Garcia and McCarthy, the team that won in 05 is pretty much intact.
If Floyd, Gonzales, Danks and Masset come through, this team will be scary in a season or two......
by timeforachange on Dec 23, 2006 6:38 PM CST reply actions
Ah, Mr. Power Arm, have a seat...
Garcia
Cotts
McCarthy
And received:
Left-handers
Andrew Sisco
Gio Gonzalez
John Danks
Carlos Vazquez
Right-handers
Nick Masset
Gavin Floyd
David Aardsma
Hopefully these deals work out for the Sox and their not like a couple other pitchers their acquired, such as...
Jon Adkins (another "power arm" that they traded where they didn't get enough in return)
Onan Masaoka (The Sox traded for Onan and then boasted about Onan but that proved to be a bit premature.)
and if those guys don't
Do you really think......
He has one hell of record on the Southside. He also has the WS title as a get out of jail free card. Plus, he is Reinsdorf's right hand man. If you are a Bulls fan, you will remember how loyal he was to Krause.
Williams is not going anywhere. If he did get let go, I would love to have him as the Cubs GM.
by timeforachange on Dec 23, 2006 8:54 PM CST up reply actions
Iguess...
So if we had traded Rich Hill or Sean Marshall would we have been any better of a team??????
McCarthy would have been an excellent pickup one or two years ago when he was a PROSPECT. right now though, I would rather have a couple proven pitchers, rather than pitchers still trying to prove themselves..........and mark my words.....Marquis will give us more than 200 innings with an ERA near 4.15.........for a #4 or $5 starter I will take that 8 days a week.
The biggest problem on this site is that everyone seems to think that the roster needs to be filled with 25 future hall-of-famers. Bottom line is that no team is filled entirely with all-stars.
Huh?
And the trade does affect the Cubs, in a way. We play the Sox 6 times a year, it would be nice to know whether we're going to be facing McCarthy at all or some other stiff. And like it or not the Sox are our neighbors, when they do something big like this it'll be news to us.
My views...
Replenishing to avoid $10 M for mediocrity
with the ridiculous price of pitching--gasp when think what Z is gonna command from us or elsewhere--teams need to develop their own pitchers. At least 2 of them not tenured and high salaried in rotation is desirable...Sox will have this in '08 and Cubs may too if Prior doesn't work out.
It's absurd to pay $10 M for .500 pitchers but that's what you do when you don't have arms ready for major leagues.
I think Kenny Williams will be vindicated with most of these deals, Garcia is not a great pitcher...McCarthy we'll see, but they've got a lot in return to stock system.
Cubs have lotta question marks in system but after this year if they don't have to recall everyone like last they make be OK too...
by writerinwrigley on Dec 24, 2006 11:46 AM CST reply actions
Strange trade
I liked McCarthy, I thought that he was capable of much more than how the Sox used him, but perhaps the Sox see the highest rated guy they received as a potental No. 1 starter. In deals like this I think you'd rather move a Beurhle for these guys because the salary gains are huge.
Williams is not afraid to take risks and I like that.
by DudeVf1 on Dec 24, 2006 12:48 PM CST reply actions
CWS Bullpen Best in MLB
by FlaCub on Dec 24, 2006 12:49 PM CST reply actions
I don't understand this trade...
Are the Sox...rebuilding?
Sorry if somebody already posted this.
you know as strange as this trade seems
You got to have some faith that the guy knows what he's doing. My guess is that Texas wouldn't give these 2 promising guys up for Vasquez or Garland, and that with a surplus of pitching, the WS wanted to make good use of their supply and restock for the future.
You've got to admire KW.
My brother in law,
Oy vey!
Why, because KW traded one prospect for other prospects? It's not like KW signed a pitcher with a 6 ERA (last yr) to a 3 year contract.
In his words,
Talk to him about it, not me, I don't care what they do over there.
by cubbiejulie on Dec 25, 2006 10:48 PM CST up reply actions
Um...
And yet here you are posting in a discussion about the White Sox....
Right
by cubbiejulie on Dec 26, 2006 10:15 AM CST up reply actions
Therein lies the irony...
by jcub on Dec 27, 2006 1:51 PM CST up reply actions
What?
The point is though that this is a discussion about the Sox. IMHO it's disingenuous, at best, to say that you do not care about the Sox and then post a message in a Sox based discussion thread, wherever that discussion is taking place.
Seems to me that if her claim were true she'd ignore the entire discussion rather than taking then time to click on the discussion (on titled "White Sox trade") and then post here.
Julie's claim is nothing new here. It's a tactic I've seen before here when Cubbie fans were discussing the Sox.
'I'm reading about the White Sox, posting in a discussion thread about the White Sox but I don't care about the White Sox nor have any interest in them at all...'
To that I say, yeah right.
I don't care about the Sox.
As far as my comment about this being a Cubs site, I was more or less making a joke based on the fact that the poster's name clearly identifies her as a Cubs fan, as does the name of this site. It is right?
by jcub on Dec 28, 2006 9:42 AM CST up reply actions
Huh?
You're concerned about this trade between the Sox and the Texas Rangers because of how it may affect the Cubs? Those 6 games got you concerned?
"I don't care about the Sox...this being a Cubs site...It is right?"
And here we go again.
Best wishes to you.
Stone on the SCORE today...
Stone also said that this is a pretty good trade for the White Sox and that people are judging it too early, Danks should be a very good middle of the rotation guy probably a number 3 who's fastball's comparable to Thornton's in speed just a little slower, and has a really good slider.
Stone also stated that Masset is going to be one of the premier set up men in the majors.

by 


















