Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

White Sox trade McCarthy

The White Sox, for some reason, traded Brandon McCarthy to the Rangers for top left prospect John Danks, and Nick Masset, another pitching prospect.

This trade would, to me, make a lot of sense if Williams was sending Garland out for two young, cheap, talented pitchers. But why trade McCarthy, who is cheap for a long time yet, for two pitchers who haven't had the success of McCarthy at the MLB level.

http://www.thebaseballcube.com/players/D/John-Danks.shtml

http://www.thebaseballcube.com/players/M/Nick-Masset.shtml

i know Danks is highly regarded, but neither player has minor league numbers that blow you away, though Danks is very young for a pitcher at AAA.

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.

Comment 48 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Now...
... this one is really strange, and I suspect Sox fans will howl, although Danks is a very, very good prospect.

Supposedly they dealt Garcia so McCarthy could go into the rotation. Dealing him for prospects makes no sense at all, unless Williams has another deal up his sleeve.

by Al Yellon on Dec 23, 2006 2:15 PM CST reply actions  

Strange indeed!
So as the story goes (especially in the Cubune) the Sox are dumping salary & going cheap. Now KW trades McCarthy for two prospects.  Interesting...

McCarthy was not good out of the pen.  He had only a few starts last season.  As much as I hoped and expected McCarthy to do well this 07 season, he was not a lock or guarantee to perform well all season.  I've always been a bit concerned about his durability for 30 starts considering his build.  It seems that for all KW's talk about McCarthy being "untouchable" they didn't show much faith in him last season, as they were very  slow to insert him into the rotation, even as Buehrle struggled, Contreras was hurt, etc.

If I were a Cubs fan, I'd be wondering why the Cubs could not have picked up McCarthy from the Sox given the price.

by DrCrawdad on Dec 23, 2006 2:40 PM CST up reply actions  

Here's the reason...
... the Cubs don't have anyone as good as Danks in their system.

If Hendry had approached Williams, the first guy Williams would have asked for would have been Rich Hill, which would have made any such deal pointless from a Cub standpoint.

by Al Yellon on Dec 23, 2006 2:49 PM CST up reply actions  

That would explain it then...
I do not know the Cubs pitching prospects, except from what I read here or hear about on WSCR, WGN Sports Central and from LeVineline.  Sports Central and Bruce LeVineline make it sound like the Cubs are overflowing with prized top pitching prospects.

by DrCrawdad on Dec 23, 2006 3:21 PM CST up reply actions  

In another year...perhaps...
...but the prospects we have need to be where they belong, the minors, rather than pitching for the big league club when they are clearly not ready and getting rocked.

A full year in the minors for Marshall, Marmol, Mateo, et al, and I think our pitching will be regarded much higher by next offseason so long as they stay healthy.

PINIELLA!

by theprognosticator on Dec 23, 2006 3:33 PM CST up reply actions  

My thought process
The White Sox traded McCarthy to the Rangers for John Danks

some other prospects were involved with the White Sox making the better end of the deal on the minor prospects involved

but for the most part this has been a REALLY REALLY interesting offseason for the white sox, they've now dealt Garcia and McCarthy to leave the rotation with: Contreras, Buehrle, Vazquez, Garland, and Haeger

Buehrle is a FA at the end of the season and has expressed his desire to pitch for the Cardinals, his hometown team.

So they've gotten there surplus of 7 quality starting pitching options down to 5 and in the process re-stocked their farm system with some higher level pitching

the question becomes in a market starved for SP, could they have gotten more? Gio Gonzalez and John Danks are two of the top 25-30 pitching prospects in baseball but at the same time they essentially have dealt two-for-two with pitching unless a guy like Buccholtz turns it around

The key with this is the White Sox have shed salary committments with Garcia this season and then McCarthy further along in the arbitration period than Danks or Gonzalez so he gets control of them longer

Plus with Dye as an impending FA and Crede as well, it appears the White Sox are trying to make the transition on the fly into a rebuilding process

the question is did they close their window too early? or is it still open this season?

With the Indians and Twins loaded for what appears to be years to come and with the Tigers in a similar situation this off-season appeared to be a preemptive strike against the rebuilding process to catch up to those teams in the long term

i think it was a good strategy, unfortunately i'm not sure Williams took enough advantage in this market thats so starved for pitching

by DartmouthCubsFan on Dec 23, 2006 3:17 PM CST reply actions  

i meant Floyd
not Buccholtz, got my old Philles prospects confused there...

by DartmouthCubsFan on Dec 23, 2006 3:20 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm bearish on the Tigers and Twins...
The Twins SP is a wreck right now with no Liriano and Radke retiring, and their offense is hardly of juggernaut proportions to make up for those losses.  

The Tigers played well above themselves last year and I think it entirely possible that they end up with no more than 85 wins in 07.

The Indians, while marvelously talented, have yet to put it together, and until they do, I'm not granting them anything they haven't earned.

So, imo, the White Sox, until the McCarthy trade, were the prohibitive favorite to take the AL Central again. Now, they could very well still take the division, even with McCarthy no longer a part of the team, but this definitely makes it harder for them.

And I just don't see the reason for this move. McCarthy is controlled for the next five years, he's ready now and has proven he can be an adequate pitcher. Danks, while talented, has not blown anyone away with his minor league numbers as of yet and might not be a factor until 2008 at the earliest. And even then, will he be better than McCarthy? Doubtful.

Unless there are other moves brewing because of this one, this is puzzling. And perhaps we as envious fans of our successful rivals are too quick to believe that their GM, even when he does something that at first and second glance looks foolish, actually has something brilliant up his sleeve, or somehow sees things nobody else does.

Perhaps Kenny Williams isn't as smart as he's been given credit for. This seems like a move based on a hunch, and a belief that Danks will be something special, as the numbers certainly don't suggest that he will be better than McCarthy at this point. This looks like a move from the gut.

But anyway you slice it, we're not going to be tell for sure until 2008 or 2009 whether or not Danks was worth it. The only thing certain right now is that the move has weakened the White Sox in the short-term, in a division very winnable for them, while guaranteeing nothing in the future.    

 

PINIELLA!

by theprognosticator on Dec 23, 2006 3:31 PM CST up reply actions  

the question is
is Haeger as good as McCarthy?

if he is then it only hurts their depth of pitching not their current 5

Haeger's AAA numbers were very impressive for a 23 yr old knuckleballer

by DartmouthCubsFan on Dec 23, 2006 3:34 PM CST up reply actions  

never trust a knuckleballer...
The pitching equivalent of smoke and mirrors.
PINIELLA!

by theprognosticator on Dec 23, 2006 3:39 PM CST up reply actions  

One of my all-time favorites...
...Wilbur Wood.

71-75, Wood's IP/ERA:

334/1.91
376/2.51
359/3.46
320/3.60
291/4.11

by DrCrawdad on Dec 23, 2006 3:51 PM CST up reply actions  

your point being?
I didn't say there haven't ever been any good knucklers, just that by and large they aren't trustworthy.

Charlie Haeger could be a great pitcher in the making, he could also be the second coming of Steve Sparks. Either way, I'd rather have McCarthy starting.

PINIELLA!

by theprognosticator on Dec 23, 2006 3:56 PM CST up reply actions  

NEVER
You did say "NEVER trust a knuckleballer."  Wilbur Wood was without a doubt a knuckleballer that you could trust.  In recent years though it does seem as though there haven't been many trustworthy knuckleballers.

If it were up to me, I'd keep Haeger in the pen, as they did last season.

by DrCrawdad on Dec 23, 2006 4:07 PM CST up reply actions  

dear god in heaven...
...give me a break Mr. Literal, I was using hyperbole to make a point. How you missed that boggles the mind.

Okay, just so you won't fly off the handle here, and I mean that figuratively, not literally, by and large I do not believe knucklers are trustworthy as pitchers, certainly not over pitchers like McCarthy and that replacing McCarthy with Haeger is a significant and largely unnecessary risk.

PINIELLA!

by theprognosticator on Dec 23, 2006 4:22 PM CST up reply actions  

He didn't "catch" you...
don't worry (not that you were). Saying "Never trust a knuckleballer" is FAR different than saying "NO knuckleballers are any good". Mister Literal should know that.

The point is, if I can be allowed to interpret you, that if a knuckleballer doesn't have his knucler, he's SOL for the game. Whereas if Zambrano, Satana or Greg Maddux don't have their dominant pitches, if they're good enough, they can fall back on something else.

Considering we're talking abouta  23 year old prospect, I think "Never trust a knuckleballer" is a perfectly apt statement.

Just saying.

(Sorry, I like to interject myself sometimes.)

TOWEL DRILL!

by tyger1147 on Dec 23, 2006 4:47 PM CST up reply actions  

Easy...
I hardly 'flew off the handle,' literally or figuratively.  I read your statement, which hyperbolic or not, struck me as ironic given my favorite pitcher is Wilbur Wood, a reliable knuckler.

Further, I said recent knuckleballers have been unreliable AND I clearly said that I'd prefer Haeger in the bullpen.

Peace.

by DrCrawdad on Dec 23, 2006 4:57 PM CST up reply actions  

What's fascinating here
Is the number of innings.  I mean, I know average IP has come down substantially over the last couple decades, but GEEZ that's a lot of innings.  My how the game has changed...
MURTON!!! - just trying to help his karma so we keep him.

by 26.2cubfan on Dec 23, 2006 5:14 PM CST up reply actions  

Ken "The Gambler" Williams
Haeger got rocked in his first MLB start and then IIRC was quite good out of the pen.

McCarthy was the favorite for the 5th spot in the rotation before the trade, but the Sox were clear that it was open to whomever won the spot.

KW is fearless in his trades, for better or worse.

by DrCrawdad on Dec 23, 2006 3:42 PM CST up reply actions  

Doc
how do you feel about the deal?

Personally, I would have rather gotten some OF help for McCarthy.  I'm not sold on McCarthy as he has "longball-itis" and it's due to his stuff being above average, not excellent.  He's a good pitcher and can mix well.  But he's not a #1-type.

Time will tell with this one.  Williams does have some serious stones, though.

by socalbob on Dec 24, 2006 10:09 AM CST up reply actions  

Teeth gritted...
How do I feel about this deal?  I'll love them (Garcia & McCarthy trades) if they work out for the Sox.  That's not a dodge, but given that all the guys they traded for are prospects, and weigh in their too that I know little about the players they received it's hard for me to evaluate the deals.  

Even at this point though the McCarthy deal is ok with me.  

Last night I participated in a discussion with Trib baseball columnist, Phil Rogers.  In Rogers column he said that McCarthy is a "polished workhorse."  McCarthy MAY become a MLB workhorse but a 23 yr old with 150 IP in 2 yrs - is he polished.  At this point, while McCarthy is farther along than Danks, McCarthy is not a proven starter let along a workhorse.

When I recall some of the other pitchers KW has traded for it makes me a bit nervous (see Kip Wells for Ritchie and Ray Durham for Jon Adkins trades) but at this point I'll trust KW and hope for the best.

by DrCrawdad on Dec 25, 2006 12:17 AM CST up reply actions  

Just an odd deal...
...anyway you slice it.

Do they really feel strong about Gavin Floyd or Charlie Haeger being able to step into the #5 slot? Or are they about to make a push for Barry Zito?

If I'm a Sox fan, Kenny Williams is burning up a lot of the currency he earned from 2005.

Just think of the howling in Cubdom if Hendry had made this deal...

PINIELLA!

by theprognosticator on Dec 23, 2006 3:18 PM CST reply actions  

Zito?
Man, if the Sox signed Zito that would flummox the Tribsters and there would no doubt be howling amongst a segment of Cub fans.

As it is though, the Sox won't be signing Zito.  Reinsdorf has been resolute about not signing pitchers to more than 3 year contracts.  I can't imagine Zito is looking for a 3 year deal.  Plus IIRC Zito is represented by Boras, which makes it even less likely that the Sox will sign him.

I would have preferred McCarthy in the rotation to the question they have in his place now.  However, it's not as though McCarthy was witout question either as he's never gone thru a season as a MLB starter.

by DrCrawdad on Dec 23, 2006 4:45 PM CST up reply actions  

It's an odd trade
but not necessarily a bad one.  If you look past the impact it will have on next years rotation (probably not that big of an impact anyway) and look at how the Sox are stockpiling talented young pitching it looks like they are trying to set themselves up for years to come.  It's a risky thing to try and do while you are also competing for your division but in a perfect world a team should be able to deal from a strength, keep it's payroll somewhat in check and still be able to contend.  If they played in a division other than the competetive A.L. Central it wouldn't look like a bad move at all.

That said, I'm sure they would have rather traded Garland or Vasquez but it makes you wonder.  Do they know something about McCarthy that they aren't telling?  Or maybe they think Haeger is the real deal?  Either way, I doubt McCarthy was going to be one of their two or three best starters next year and I'm guessing that Haeger can do an adequate job in the rotation, so barring an injury they shouldn't be a great deal weaker next year because of this.

by pageian on Dec 23, 2006 4:29 PM CST reply actions  

Balls of steel.....
After winning the WS, Kenny has made some bold moves.

I really like what he has done with his team.  If you look at their Minor League reviews, the talent was thin at best.  He has stocked the system with the some power arms.  IMHO, he is doing the smart thing in restocking on the fly.  Too many teams let things get out of hand before they begin a transition.  Even though he lost Garcia and McCarthy, the team that won in 05 is pretty much intact.

If Floyd, Gonzales, Danks and Masset come through, this team will be scary in a season or two......

It is good to be home again!!!!!!

by timeforachange on Dec 23, 2006 6:38 PM CST reply actions  

Ah, Mr. Power Arm, have a seat...
The Sox have now traded pitchers:
Garcia
Cotts
McCarthy

And received:

Left-handers
Andrew Sisco
Gio Gonzalez  
John Danks  
Carlos Vazquez

Right-handers
Nick Masset
Gavin Floyd
David Aardsma

Hopefully these deals work out for the Sox and their not like a couple other pitchers their acquired, such as...

Jon Adkins (another "power arm" that they traded where they didn't get enough in return)
Onan Masaoka (The Sox traded for Onan and then boasted about Onan but that proved to be a bit premature.)

by DrCrawdad on Dec 23, 2006 7:39 PM CST up reply actions  

and if those guys don't
come through as major leaguers, KW will be gone.

by cubswin on Dec 23, 2006 8:35 PM CST up reply actions  

Do you really think......
KW will be gone?  

He has one hell of record on the Southside. He also has the WS title as a get out of jail free card. Plus, he is Reinsdorf's right hand man.  If you are a Bulls fan, you will remember how loyal he was to Krause.

Williams is not going anywhere.  If he did get let go, I would love to have him as the Cubs GM.

It is good to be home again!!!!!!

by timeforachange on Dec 23, 2006 8:54 PM CST up reply actions  

Iguess...
...my perspective on this whole situation is this.........we didn't have anyone of equal value to trade......therefore this is an absolute zero in  Jim Hendry's off-season diary.  Why are we even talking about this as it means absolutely nothing to our organization.

So if we had traded Rich Hill or Sean Marshall would we have been any better of a team??????

McCarthy would have been an excellent pickup one or two years ago when he was a PROSPECT.  right now though, I would rather have a couple proven pitchers, rather than pitchers still trying to prove themselves..........and mark my words.....Marquis will give us more than 200 innings with an ERA near 4.15.........for a #4 or $5 starter I will take that 8 days a week.

The biggest problem on this site is that everyone seems to think that the roster needs to be filled with 25 future hall-of-famers.  Bottom line is that no team is filled entirely with all-stars.

Here's to a new year!!

by santo for prez on Dec 24, 2006 4:31 AM CST reply actions  

Huh?
How did a discussion on how trading Brandon McCarthy affects the White Sox devolve into a discussion on how everyone on this site thinks we need 9 Hall Of Famers?  I don't think that's the case anyway but you seemed to have made a couple pretty big leaps in logic to get from where you started to where you ended.

And the trade does affect the Cubs, in a way.  We play the Sox 6 times a year, it would be nice to know whether we're going to be facing McCarthy at all or some other stiff.  And like it or not the Sox are our neighbors, when they do something big like this it'll be news to us.

by pageian on Dec 24, 2006 7:52 AM CST up reply actions  

My views...
is that this could have a domino effect. It could be a precursor to an A-Rod trade. The Yankees need a younger rotation and seem to be going in that direction. On the Rangers side, it appears that they're afraid that Zito is signing elsewhere.
All right, Hendry!! Time to sign Zambrano to an extension!!

by fuzzycubfan on Dec 24, 2006 8:01 AM CST reply actions  

Replenishing to avoid $10 M for mediocrity
It's obvious what Sox are doing and what Cubs are trying to do by stop-gapping with Lilly, Marquis while trying to restock the arms in minors.

with the ridiculous price of pitching--gasp when think what Z is gonna command from us or elsewhere--teams need to develop their own pitchers. At least 2 of them not tenured and high salaried in rotation is desirable...Sox will have this in '08 and Cubs may too if Prior doesn't work out.

It's absurd to pay $10 M for .500 pitchers but that's what you do when you don't have arms ready for major leagues.

I think Kenny Williams will be vindicated with most of these deals, Garcia is not a great pitcher...McCarthy we'll see, but they've got a lot in return to stock system.

Cubs have lotta question marks in system but after this year if they don't have to recall everyone like last they make be OK too...

by writerinwrigley on Dec 24, 2006 11:46 AM CST reply actions  

Strange trade
I thought the Sox had more needs in the OF, so to focus only on pitchers in return seems strange but maybe W thinks at the very least he'll have more of what the market values right now?

I liked McCarthy, I thought that he was capable of much more than how the Sox used him, but perhaps the Sox see the highest rated guy they received as a potental No. 1 starter.  In deals like this I think you'd rather move a Beurhle for these guys because the salary gains are huge.

Williams is not afraid to take risks and I like that.

by DudeVf1 on Dec 24, 2006 12:48 PM CST reply actions  

CWS Bullpen Best in MLB
Right now they have the best pen.... I think that was their concern ..... also some of these arms are going for a Baldelli or some other Out fielder.... and maybe a short stop.... I think they are making some good gambles here.... pitching is strength.... but there must have been something about MacCarthy that wanted them to deal..... getting Baldelli would be great for them.... and I have heard Scott Anderson & and a young Pitcher for Scott Olsen LHP Marlins as a possible....

by FlaCub on Dec 24, 2006 12:49 PM CST reply actions  

I don't understand this trade...
but maybe Williams thinks that he needs to get lots of prospects, hope some of them stick, and save money because the market is so crazy that who knows what will happen in the future.

Are the Sox...rebuilding?

Sorry if somebody already posted this.

"I don't talk. I just let what I do talk for myself." -Johan Santana

by sparkles721 on Dec 25, 2006 12:18 PM CST reply actions  

you know as strange as this trade seems
KW did win them a WS.

You got to have some faith that the guy knows what he's doing.  My guess is that Texas wouldn't give these 2 promising guys up for Vasquez or Garland, and that with a surplus of pitching, the WS wanted to make good use of their supply and restock for the future.

You've got to admire KW.

by nickler on Dec 25, 2006 12:36 PM CST reply actions  

My brother in law,
the die-hard South Sider, actually needed consoling yesterday. KW ruined his Xmas.
HENDRY!

by cubbiejulie on Dec 25, 2006 1:14 PM CST reply actions  

Oy vey!
"My brother in law, the die-hard South Sider, actually needed consoling yesterday. KW ruined his Xmas."

Why, because KW traded one prospect for other prospects?  It's not like KW signed a pitcher with a   6 ERA (last yr) to a 3 year contract.

by DrCrawdad on Dec 25, 2006 10:35 PM CST up reply actions  

In his words,
because they traded a proven pitcher for two unproven pitchers.

Talk to him about it, not me, I don't care what they do over there.

HENDRY!

by cubbiejulie on Dec 25, 2006 10:48 PM CST up reply actions  

Um...
"I don't care what they do over there."

And yet here you are posting in a discussion about the White Sox....

by DrCrawdad on Dec 25, 2006 11:23 PM CST up reply actions  

Right
Posting about how funny it was that it upset my BIL, not about how it affected me.
HENDRY!

by cubbiejulie on Dec 26, 2006 10:15 AM CST up reply actions  

Therein lies the irony...
since this is a Cubs site (not trying to be exclusionary Crawdad, just pointing out that poster "cubbiejulie" is posting on a cubs site--seems appropriate even if she is posting about applesauce or the Dominican League).
"My uncle says you've got a screw loose." -- "Your uncle molests collies." Caddyshack

by jcub on Dec 27, 2006 1:51 PM CST up reply actions  

What?
Yes, this is a blog by a Cub fan, whom I am acquainted with.  I think you'd have a point IF I said that I don't care about the Cubs.  As it is, I've never said that.  

The point is though that this is a discussion about the Sox.  IMHO it's disingenuous, at best, to say that you do not care about the Sox and then post a message in a Sox based discussion thread, wherever that discussion is taking place.  

Seems to me that if her claim were true she'd ignore the entire discussion rather than taking then time to click on the discussion (on titled "White Sox trade") and then post here.  

Julie's claim is nothing new here.  It's a tactic I've seen before here when Cubbie fans were discussing the Sox.

'I'm reading about the White Sox, posting in a discussion thread about the White Sox but I don't care about the White Sox nor have any interest in them at all...'  

To that I say, yeah right.

by DrCrawdad on Dec 27, 2006 10:30 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't care about the Sox.
I do, however, care about an exchange of players that may later affect my Cubs.

As far as my comment about this being a Cubs site, I was more or less making a joke based on the fact that the poster's name clearly identifies her as a Cubs fan, as does the name of this site.  It is right?

"My uncle says you've got a screw loose." -- "Your uncle molests collies." Caddyshack

by jcub on Dec 28, 2006 9:42 AM CST up reply actions  

Huh?
"I do, however, care about an exchange of players that may later affect my Cubs."

You're concerned about this trade between the Sox and the Texas Rangers because of how it may affect the Cubs?  Those 6 games got you concerned?

"I don't care about the Sox...this being a Cubs site...It is right?"

And here we go again.

Best wishes to you.

by DrCrawdad on Dec 28, 2006 10:28 PM CST up reply actions  

Do me a favor
Change your screen name to "Captain Literal"
Baby, you got a stew goin'

by Thelonious on Dec 29, 2006 9:49 AM CST up reply actions  

Stone on the SCORE today...
Basically he just talked about both clubs and the Zito signing by the Giants. He said that one reason he believes the Sox traded Brandon was because he never truly developed his fastball with any movement, it was still the same fastball that if he didn't have enough velocity with it it was gonna be hit out of the ballpark.

Stone also said that this is a pretty good trade for the White Sox and that people are judging it too early, Danks should be a very good middle of the rotation guy probably a number 3 who's fastball's comparable to Thornton's in speed just a little slower, and has a really good slider.

Stone also stated that Masset is going to be one of the premier set up men in the majors.

by DrCrawdad on Dec 29, 2006 7:32 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Jazz Up Your Recs!
Img_0001_small
Value of Various Plate Approaches
284_small
Cubs' Fantasy Camp 2012 as seen by a Player's Wife
P7200073_small
Randy Hundley Fantasy Camp 2012

Recent FanPosts

Small
Arguably OT: Aussie Baseball Finals Go To Decisive Game Three
Small
New Cubs draft strategy player development
Jeffnewwork_small
What I Expect From The Cubs In 2012
Wrigley_scoreboard_small
What To Do With Alfonso Soriano
Small
A quick update from the 2012 concessions orientation
Caray_small
Is there any FA left worth going after?
Marvin_the_martian_small
Thoughts On Gerardo Concepcion: Trust The Scouts
Star_small
What if Hendry were still our GM instead of TheoJed?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Nice article about Ernie Banks
Yankees Hire Jim Hendry
Dale Sveum Meets Early Arrivals At Camp Buss

Recent FanShots

The Rickettsification of Wrigleyville has begun!
Marlins' Cespedes Offer 6 years, under $40M (MLBTR Link)
BCB Fantasy Baseball 2012
Former Cubs Blogger Interviewed on The Score
Cubs vs. Rangers In Las Vegas Tickets On Sale Monday 2/13
Hoyer driving to Spring Training with his dog
Hoyer-Soriano likely a Cub to start 2012, Garza extension talk a possibility
Law's Top 100 prospects
Ranking the Farm Systems
WGN Releases Season Schedule

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Featured Poll

Poll
How many games will the Cubs win in 2012?

  284 votes | Results

It Is Only...

It Is Only...

Cubs By The Numbers

Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.

Click here to order your copy, available now!

Recent Stories in Ticket Exchanges


Managing Editor

Alyellontoppscard_small Al Yellon

Front Page Contributors

Primary_fc_small Josh Timmers

Marvin_the_martian_small Shawn Domagal-Goldman

Other Contributors

Dsc_0139_small David Sameshima

Toonmike_small Mike Bojanowski