The Top 100 Cubs Of All Time - #47 Aramis Ramirez
This is an update to the Aramis Ramirez profile in the Top 100 Cubs series that was originally posted on December 25, 2006 -- written by BCB'er Ross. Ramirez was 55th in the original ranking, done after the 2006 season; his seasons since then, even with some of the time he lost to injury, have moved him up to 47th. (In career WAR as a Cub, Aramis ranks 55th as of the end of the 2010 season.) Most of this is the original post; the additional material is at the end of the post, with a bit of editing throughout to bring dates, etc. up to date. This is the second of five profile updates; Kerry Wood's was updated on January 23, Carlos Zambrano's on January 24 and the profile of the other active player on the list -- Derrek Lee, as well as the profile of Greg Maddux, who played two more years after 2006 -- will also be updated before spring training begins. The original comments are still here; you can add to them now.
Profile by BCB reader Ross (edited by Al Yellon with additions on January 25, 2011)
If the BCB top 100 list had been compiled in 1985, where would Ryne Sandberg have ranked? How about in 1957? Where would Ernie Banks have finished?
Aramis Ramirez's 47th placement on this list should come with an asterisk. His is a career that is incomplete, a career that likely has not yet reached its peak. In fact, the Cubs bet about $75 million over five years that he'd peak with the team, and despite several serious injuries, he has produced many exciting days -- one of them pictured above -- and, with his 19th home run of 2011, will pass Gabby Hartnett into sixth place on the all-time Cub home run list. He is a great success story; a young prospect who was brought up too soon, overcame injuries and finally found himself as one of the premier third basemen in baseball.
A cousin of slugger Manny Ramirez, Aramis Nin Ramirez was born June 25, 1978 in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic. He signed with the Pirates as a 16-year-old non-drafted free agent in November 1994, even before he graduated from Aida Cartagena Portalatin HS. He opened his professional career with the Pirates' Dominican Rookie Summer League team, belting 11 homers, 13 doubles and 54 RBI in 1995.
He went to Single-A Erie in 1996 and earned All-Star honors with a .305 batting average and nine homers as a 17-year-old. The next year he cemented himself as one of the Pirates' top prospects when he won the Carolina League MVP award, batting .278 with 29 homers and 114 RBI at Lynchburg.
With incumbent 3B Joe Randa leaving Pittsburgh following the 1997 season, and starters Freddy Garcia (not the Mariners and White Sox pitcher) and Doug Strange not exactly tearing the cover off of the ball, the door was opened for the 19-year-old Ramirez to make his big league debut on May 26, 1998. He quickly proved that he was overmatched, going hitless in his first 24 at bats, but he came around, hitting .260 the rest of the way and finished the season at .235 with six homers and 24 RBI in 71 games. He suffered a separated shoulder and missed nearly a month.
The Pirates organization wasn't thrilled with the team's 5-25 record down the stretch and acquired a handful of veterans, including third baseman Ed Sprague, thus relegating Ramirez back to the minors. He tore up AAA pitching to the tune of .328 with 21 homers and 76 RBI, earning All-Star honors and a September cup of coffee. He also appeared in the All-Star Futures game. "There is little doubt he has superstar ability, but he's not yet ready to take that step at age 20," the Stats Inc. Scouting Notebook wrote of him following the season.
Sprague was gone by 2000 and the starting job was Ramirez's to lose. And lose it he did, hitting just .167 in 18 games before getting sent down again. He tore up AAA at .353 with 4 homers and 26 RBI and was selected to play in Futures Game before Pittsburgh recalled him. He hit .256 with six homers and 35 RBI before he suffered a dislocation of his left shoulder in late August and missed the rest of the season.
By the 2001 season, Ramirez had been pegged as an enigma. A below average runner who was hit and miss with the glove. A strong arm and a lackadaisical attitude. Immature and arrogant, but with signs of maturity and humility. It was a crossroads in his career, and Ramirez proved he was up to the challenge, putting together a breakthrough season as he hit .300 with 40 doubles, 34 homers and 112 RBI. The 2002 season saw him continue to put up big numbers in the early going and he was hitting .348 on April 17 when his season took a turn. He was plunked by the Brewers' Ben Sheets and charged the mound, only to find himself suffering a sprained ankle at the bottom of a scrum during the bench-clearing brawl. Though he never went on the DL, was unable to generate any power off of the bum ankle and hit just .234 with 17 homers.
By 2003, the question was: which Ramirez was the real one? Was the .300 season an outlier, or was he the real deal? Despite his .280 average and 12 homers through 96 games, the Pirates had tired of his inconsistency, of his inability to live up to the hype. And more to the point, they were leery of paying him the three million he was owed that season and six million he was due to receive in 2004. Rumors of the Pirates being unable to meet payroll swirled about as the Cubs swooped down on him and Kenny Lofton in exchange for shortstop Jose Hernandez, minor leaguer Matt Bruback and soon-to-fizzle prospect Bobby Hill on July 23, 2003 to fill a pair of major holes in their 2003 squad, ending the revolving door of Mark Bellhorn, Lenny Harris, Hernandez and Ramon Martinez at the hot corner.
Ramirez finished 2003 by hitting .259 with 14 homers and 39 RBI. Freed of the expectations in Pittsburgh and given a chance to develop in the shadow of other stars, he bloomed at the plate, swatting 36 homers with 103 RBI while hitting .318 in 2004 becoming only the third Cubs 3B to drive in 100 runs in a season, joining Ron Santo and Andy Pafko.
In 2004 he banged out 31 homers and hit .302 in just 123 games in 2005. And of course, he set career highs with 38 homers and 119 RBI in 2006. Overall he has hit 213 homers in his Cubs career (seventh on the club all-time list) and has a .293 batting average in the blue pinstripes (3667 AB, 1073 hits).
When Ramirez elected to opt out in the midst of his four year, $42 million dollar contract that he signed in April, 2005, many Cubs fans were heartbroken, fully expecting to see him cash in for huge money elsewhere. Instead, Ramirez told his agent that he wanted to stay in Chicago, and he eventually took less money in a five-year, $73 million dollar deal that also gave him a no-trade clause. He made it clear he wants to win in Chicago.
"I've got a lot to prove here," he told the media after signing the deal. "We were so close to winning the World Series in '03. I know I left a lot of money on the table, but I want to be here, I like it here and I know we're going to win here."
His 2007 and 2008 seasons, perhaps his career peak, produced .915 and .898 OPS figures and 100+ RBI each season, making it three years in a row he would drive in 100 or more runs. He was one of eight Cubs to make the NL All-Star team in 2008, and his production was a big reason the team led the NL in runs scored. He was mostly healthy those two years, although he missed 30 games in 2007, even while finishing 13th in NL MVP voting.
The 2009 season started out well for Aramis and then on May 8 in Milwaukee, he dove for a Ryan Braun smash down the line and lay on the ground grimacing in pain. He had dislocated his left shoulder. In retrospect, since the Cubs went nowhere in 2009, Aramis probably should have rested longer. But two months later he was back in the lineup, and after a slow start, he had a good second half and wound up with overall numbers in just over a half season's worth of games played (82): 15 HR, 65 RBI, .317/.389/.516, that would have made him a MVP candidate over a full year.
Ramirez did not have a good start in 2010. In fact, that's being nice. He barely hit .160 for the first two months and his OPS was hardly half of his usual .900+ -- he struggled to keep it over .500. Finally, in early June, he and the team acknowledged he had a hand injury and he went on the DL. On his return, clearly healthy, he started to rake in his traditional style, and in, again, about half a season's worth of games (77), he hit .287/.333/.556 (.889 OPS) with 20 HR and 61 RBI, hinting that, given a full healthy season, A-Ram could still put up the numbers Cubs fans became accustomed to between 2004 and 2008. Even missing two months, he still led the Cubs in HR and RBI.
Ramirez had another opt-out clause after 2010, but realizing his overall 2010 numbers might not rate a big free-agent deal, he chose to stay with the Cubs. The team has a $16 million option for 2012 with a $2 million buyout; if Ramirez can put up another .900+ OPS season with 35 HR and 110 RBI, look for him to remain with the team in 2012 (and beyond that, he'd be an MVP candidate and the team would be vastly improved, too). He's still among the most popular Cubs; his No. 16 jerseys are seen all over Wrigley, and he and Carlos Zambrano are the most senior Cubs in consecutive tenure (along with Kerry Wood, who has returned).
69 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
this may be blasphemy
Hey, I'm one of the biggest Aramis fans
Take Ron in his prime, from 63-69.
OPS+
129
164
146
161
153
126
131
And now Aramis, since 03.
107 (in 63 games)
136
137
126
Santo was also more patient and much better defensively. There is no shame in Aramis not being as good as Santo, who is a better player than many Hall of Famers and should be in the Hall himself.
by VS on Dec 25, 2006 5:24 PM CST up reply actions
Good point
Agreed.
But minor quibble — it appears you’re saying that Aramis is 28. He’s 32 and will turn 33 this June.
Contributing Editor, SB Nation Chicago. Please follow us on Twitter!
Holy crap.
I just realized that I’m responding to comments posted in 2006.
Contributing Editor, SB Nation Chicago. Please follow us on Twitter!
I knew something was amiss...
…when I saw cubbiejulie’s picture.
Contributing Editor, SB Nation Chicago. Please follow us on Twitter!
I did the same thing yesterday in Z post!
Scary part is Al reminds us near top of post! Oh well, I blame it on a long stressful day (or my stupidity! :])
I didn't understand the "white-collar Cub fans", "blue-collar Sox fans" until much later in life. Harry Smith~ "For Cubs Fans Only".
Hey...
… it can make you feel like you’re in a time warp. Maybe we could relive those playoff series of 2007 and 2008 and win them this time.
Or not.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
So that's 3 games, times 2 series...
at 3.5 hrs/game… our “time-warp” would be over in about 21 hrs! Man, those painful series seemed to last weeks!
I didn't understand the "white-collar Cub fans", "blue-collar Sox fans" until much later in life. Harry Smith~ "For Cubs Fans Only".
D'oh -- I've been caught skimming yet again.
Contributing Editor, SB Nation Chicago. Please follow us on Twitter!
Keep in mind that his comment was posted in 2006.
by TakeoutArtist on Jan 26, 2011 11:57 AM CST up reply actions
I don't remember how I felt in 06.
But today I’d say yes. It is blasphemy.
by katie casey on Jan 25, 2011 11:51 AM CST up reply actions
A good write-up...
To clarify...
Thanks for the kind words and Merry Christmas to those who partake in such things. :)
Your sig line is classic in so many ways.
Contributing Editor, SB Nation Chicago. Please follow us on Twitter!
But you know...
Isn't that what so many people on here say: "How dare he NOT have stepped up when the team needed him most? You know, in a sport where one person has the least impact on a team compared to other major sports, he tanked last year. And cost the Cubs the season. And then put up "fantasy numbers". How dare he! He's never done anything to help the Cubs win. Punk."
You know, except hitting two homeruns in the last post-season game the Cubs have ever won. Sheesh.
My current favorite
by Cub Fan in Card Country on Dec 25, 2006 12:34 PM CST reply actions
Nice job, Ross
I really want to love ARam, but, for whatever reason, I (like a lot of fans, I think), just haven't connected with him. . . .yet. Here's to hoping he'll give us reason to love him next season.
I can identify with that
Corner Infielder
Chicago Cubs
2007 World Series Champions
Well, no...
It is truly sad, but he may be able only to get in after he is no longer with us.
I really hope its not the case. I am happy to have seen him play many-a-time however - and, eat his mini-pizzas at Wrigley.
I do not know if I agree 100% for sure that "one man cannot take over a game" in baseball. A dominating pitcher like Santana can.
Also, a player such as Pujols, or Bonds in his "prime", can certainly throw a huge wrench in a manager's game plan. An intentional walk with the bases loaded? The two-out home-run against Lidge in the 2005 NLCS to win the game, etc. Maybe, one player can hugely influence a game's outcome?
by TheEman on Dec 25, 2006 8:41 PM CST up reply actions
Grand Slam
Ooops
Sutcliffe
That was a magical day.
And the next day was just as good.
One more damn win. <sigh>
13-0 game
I have always believed...
They did not have a travel day. They played Tuesday and Wednesday afternoon in Chicago, traveled to SD Wed. night and played THURSDAY night in SD, then had FRIDAY off.
I wonder if they had had an off day, whether that might have made a difference. They came out absolutely flat in game 3 and got pounded.
So Al,
I was only 18, and didn't see the real significance of it since I'd only been a fan for 2 years, and was in my freshman college experience and wasn't 100% into it, but after looking at the tape again, etc.. it's an injustice.
I know you haven't looked at the tape since then? but I had to look.... for those who didn't see it... bottom 6, cubs up 3-0. SD scores 2 runs to make it 3-2 going to the 7th. Don Drysdale, Reggie Jackson and Earl Weaver (and Tim McCarver roaming the bullpens) calling the game for ABC. Carmelo Martinez leads off the bottom of the 7th for SD with a 4-pitch walk from Sutcliffe. Templeton sac-bunts him over to 2nd. That's when Tim Flannery hits the hard hopper to Durham at 1B that gets unders his legs/glove to tie the score. McCarver reports that Steve Trout (the cubs lefty) is warming up in the BP. Alan Wiggins then hits a bloop to left to make it 1st and 2nd, 1 out. Has cubs manager Jim Frey seen enough? nope- even with Tony Gwynn up, a tiring Sut on the mound and Gwynn at the plate.
Tony Gwynn steps up and hammers a pitch at Sandberg, with runners at first and second, but it JUST gets past him (hard-hit ball) and perhaps he could have made the play? If you see it again, Sandberg would probably tell you he should have made what would have been an inning-ending DP, but instead, 5-3 Padres. Sutcliffe still in. Steve Gravey nails one up the middle to make it 6-3, which would be the final score. Did JIM FREY leave him in too long? has anybody ever questioned that? It was a frikkin hot day in san diego. that sealed it. I think JIM FREY LEFT HIM IN TOO LONG.
some interesting footnotes- Goose Gossage got the save. RAK was on the sleeve of the SD unis for Ray A Kroc, the McDonalds franchiser (AKA obesity entrepreneur) Steve Gravey is awarded MBP of the series for most broken hearts, which Tim McCarver is happy to present him with, and Don Drysdale, after the final out prounces "the padres have won it all!" even though they lost to the tigers in 5 games in the world series.
oh, later that evening was another presidential debate, perhaps the first one, between ronald reagan and walter mondale, moderated by barbara walters.
PS: Goose Gossage got the save. am I leaving out anything? the bull's 2-HR? anything...
by cashcowsquirtingsourmilk on Dec 27, 2006 1:01 AM CST up reply actions
No...
The Cubs did NOT have home field -- and they didn't lose home field by not having lights, either. That's a myth. The NL West was scheduled to have home field by rotation in 1984 (at that time it rotated between divisions). The only home field advantage they would have lost was in the World Series, had they made it.
They should have played Friday night, Saturday night, Sunday afternoon in SD. Maybe the day off would have helped the Cubs and they could have swept.
Oh, well.
sorry
other people have said that the cubs would have had home field if not for the lack of lights. nice to be informed /sarcasm
by cashcowsquirtingsourmilk on Dec 27, 2006 3:20 AM CST up reply actions
to follow up Al
Next year they are starting the world series on a tuesday, which is a great thing, to avoid competition with football. yet another reason to go to 7 games in the LDS. I hate the 5 game series, IMHO.
by cashcowsquirtingsourmilk on Dec 27, 2006 3:32 AM CST up reply actions
In the '80s...
The NL East had had the home field in the 1983 NLCS, so it was the West's turn. It really is as simple as that.
And indeed, I think that if they had taken a travel day -- which they should have, going to the West Coast -- the Cubs would have been just fine for game three. There was no need for a travel day in the ALCS -- Detroit vs. Kansas City, only an hour apart by plane. They could have skipped the day off in that series and given it to the Cubs & Padres.
<sigh>
My question...
Why weren't the Padres flat coming out? Surely they'd have as much reason to be flat as the Cubs.
And if one argues that the Padres weren't on the road, isn't that the point of homefield advantage? Even if it is ridiculous on how it was setup, what's the point of "homefield" if not for the advantage?
Anyway, I have no argument as I was four at the time and don't even remember Cubs before the early 90's. Just curious...
I'll tell you part of it.
Now, that sounds like "not much", but the atmosphere was one of the craziest ones I've ever seen. The Cubs seemed befuddled by it.
Would that have happened after an off-day? Maybe so, but there would have been the day in between.
And remember, the Padres had home field just because of random rotation -- not due to the better record, which would have been fairer.
<sigh>
Cubs in '84
that grand salami
but enough nostalgia. Cheers to a fruitful 2007 and beyond (tips glass and dribbles on white shirt)
by cashcowsquirtingsourmilk on Dec 27, 2006 1:18 AM CST reply actions
Love Aramis
He’s provided us with so many wonderful memories over the last 8 summers. Here’s to many more (in the falls, too)
Keep that Q Train rollin' in '11. Let's win it for Ronnie.
June 29, 2007 - I am such a fool
The picture above is from June 29, 2007 and I was home on my 2 weeks leave from the Army in Afghanistan. I played golf in the morning with friends and my father-in-law in Glencoe. My buddy spoke to one of our fellow season ticket holders who had tickets for that game. So we planned to go to the game, albeit arriving late.
We got in the car, turned on the radio, and the Cubs are already down 5-0. Ugh! So we decided to go to O’Donavan’s instead. And we only watched the game winning home run on TV. Doh!
"Easy on the words, brother,'' Quade said.
That was one of the best comebacks in Cubs history in my lifetime.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
I remember that game well
I was stuck at work (but still able to watch it on tv) while one of my friends was there, I kept texting her telling her she was bad luck….I had to (gladly) eat my words after the HR.
This was the most memorable Cubs game I’ve ever attended. I’m especially lucky to have been there, considering I normally attend 2-3 games a year.
The thing I remember most was never seeing the ball once Ramirez hit it. I knew from the reaction that it was gone, but I just couldn’t spot it. I’ve never heard Wrigley Field louder than when that homerun was hit and I’ll never forget that game.
Fight Rankings - I don't know more about MMA than you, but I'll certainly pretend that I do.
I've been at a lot of games, as most here know.
That’s one of the two or three loudest reactions I have ever heard at Wrigley.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
It was definitely a one of a kind game that deserved such a raucous response. Everything had to go just right for the Cubs to make it back down 5-0 after the top of the first. The bullpen was great as the offense kept chipping away at the lead.
After Lee’s sacrifice made it 5-4, you could feel the crowd react in a million different ways. It was good to get a run closer, but giving up the second out in the ninth was great. Ramirez is coming to bat, but Cordero has been lights out all year. Luckily, it just took the one pitch for Ramirez to end the game.
That game officially overtook the corked-bat game as my most memorable Wrigley Field experience, which I’m very glad for.
Fight Rankings - I don't know more about MMA than you, but I'll certainly pretend that I do.
Me too
every time I talk baseball with my son he brings that up. I was watching it on tv, but went flippin crazy. The fact that we were getting hot in a pennant race, and it was against the team we were chasing is what made it over the top. It just felt like a destiny moment at that time.
"Baseball is ninety percent mental. The other half is physical." -Yogi Berra
It's the tongue wag that does it for me.
That’s when I know he’s “on” at the plate.
"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks
Can they teach that in the minors?
They should be!
"Easy on the words, brother,'' Quade said.
by RiskyBusiness on Jan 25, 2011 12:33 PM CST up reply actions
I hope he has a good bounce back season this year
''"I always thought I was the most competitive person out there. I never thought I'd find anybody more competitive until I met him.'' Ryan Dempster talking about Ted Lilly
by Madison Cub Fan on Jan 25, 2011 11:38 AM CST reply actions
Soon to be 33 years old and on a contract year...
…I predict 35 HRs…110 RBIs….295 BA… .990 OPS…top 5 MVP…ZERO stints on the DL (imagine that). There’s somethin’ about a pro athlete and their contract years that just seems to make them more focused. Go figure.
Unless he comes out of the gate and struggles, then he could be gone by trade deadline (if he waves his 5 and 10 rights) and Gabby Hartnett will remain in 6th place. I hope not…other than his questionable defense at times, I’m an A-Ram fan.
"I think part of a best friend's job should be to immediately clear your computer history if you die." - Anonymous
.990 OPS?
That’d be great. It would be a career high for him. I hope you’re right.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
Yeah...that might be a bit high
He’s capable. Staying healthy is the key. He’s main piece number 1A and Z is main piece number 1B for this team to even attempt to compete.
"I think part of a best friend's job should be to immediately clear your computer history if you die." - Anonymous
You've pretty much covered both extremes here. :-)
Contributing Editor, SB Nation Chicago. Please follow us on Twitter!
The Brewers walk-off was obviously great.
I was a big fan of the 8th inning (I think) go ahead grand slam against the Phillies. Soriano was on third at the time, and immediately off the bat he just put his arms up and started walking home. It was like an animation from MLB: The Show (anyone who played that game might know what I’m talking about). It was a night game and Ramirez absolutely BLASTED that ball. That was awesome.
The day after the grand slam game the Cubs beat the Phils again to reach 35 over .500,
the high point of the season. From there they went 12-14 to finish the season and never really felt like quite the same team. And then, of course, came the playoffs…
I remember you posting something about that
Was it walks they took, that almost (or did) broke the record? I remember it being a sidebar counter.
''"I always thought I was the most competitive person out there. I never thought I'd find anybody more competitive until I met him.'' Ryan Dempster talking about Ted Lilly
by Madison Cub Fan on Jan 26, 2011 2:45 PM CST up reply actions
Walks, yes.
They were on pace to break the team record, but fell short. The 1975 team still holds it.
That 1975 team scored a lot of runs. They sucked because the pitching staff was atrocious.
"You can observe a lot just by watching." ~ Yogi Berra
A-Ram - The Real Long-Term Replacement for Santo
Bill Madlock had three very good years for the Cubs in the mid-1970’s. Madlock could have had a long career with the Cubs at third base, but the Cubs management messed that up. Ron Cey had a 25-HR season in 1984. Vance Law had an all-star season in 1988. A-Ram finally brought that long-sought stability at third base that the Cubs hadn’t had since Santo.
2011 - The 103rd time is the charm.
The slam off Dontrelle
in Game 4 of the NLCS, was awesome.
Scott Bora$ is satan.
by Canadian Cubs Fan on Jan 25, 2011 4:24 PM CST reply actions
Two thoughts....
I was watching Web Gems on either the night of May 7th or the morning of May 8th and the following thought went through my head after watching someone make a diving catch… “When is someone going to kill an entire season with an injury for just one out”…. And low and behold that injury would happen to ARam in less than 24 hours.
This is only related because ARam plays 3B and when the bio was written he was compared to Santo.
“The Count” from the Wall Street Journal Sports Section yesterday was outlining the career of Andruw Jones and his dramatic fall from peak performance and somewhat arguing if he was still a HOF candidate. The reason I bring it up…. “Of the 26 eligible position players with at least 60 WAR through age 30, all but two are enshrined in Cooperstown: Sherry Magee and (our beloved) Ron Santo.”
Not top 10? This is an outrage!
/obligatory
"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root
Aram took less money when resigning with the Cubs?
Less than what? When he opted out of his contract and got the 5 yr deal, his yearly salary went up from $10,25 million to $14,6 million. That’s other 40% more.
I doubt he left any money on the table in that deal since he got 5 yrs and a NTC along with the money.
by DamageControlFreak on Jan 26, 2011 1:57 AM CST reply actions
The trade for Ramirez/Lofton
has to rank up there as one of the best. I think Lofton was the key to that team making the run they did in 2003. I’d love to have someone like him leading off.
I’ll never forget the Ramirez homer pictured that beat the Brewers and kicked started that great comeback. Talk about a momentum swing.
I didn’t realize Rami was so up and down as a Pirate, good info
monster player
but how much longer will the cubs tolerate the injuries. unfortunately we have no one to replace him who can put up his numbers. still one of my favorite players. his departure will leave a giant hole.

by 






















