Bleed Cubbie Blue: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Race to the BCS: rankings, in-game scores & blogs Bar-right-arrows



The Top 100 Cubs Of All Time - #77 Riggs Stephenson

Riggs Stephenson, pictured in 1932

Profile by BCB reader Molechaser

The Riggs Stephenson story is generally told as one of "what might have been." Born in Akron, Alabama on January 5, 1898, Stephenson attended his homestate school, the University of Alabama, and according to his standard narrative, Stephenson's defense was harmed by a shoulder injury incurred playing football at 'Bama; as a result, he was unable to make long throws. While Stephenson played sports with the Crimson Tide, Dr. George Denny, president of the university, said of him: "He is the embodiment of cleanliness, manliness, and courage."

During his early career with Cleveland, he was a second baseman, where his suspect arm made it difficult for him to turn double plays. As a result, he saw limited playing time, averaging only 66 games per season during his five years in Cleveland.

But with the Cubs, Riggs Stephenson was converted to a serviceable defensive outfielder. In nine seasons, he averaged 109 games per season. The Cubs put him in left field; although he would have shorter throws from this position than in any other outfield spot, his shoulder still limited his ability. While he did have markedly fewer outfield assists than either of his partners in the Cubs' outfield (Kiki Cuyler and Hack Wilson), he still averaged over 10 per 154-game season, comparable to most modern-day left fielders.

Regardless of whether his defense is properly described as "suspect" or "serviceable," Stephenson's offense was outstanding. He led the National League in doubles in 1927, and he batted worse than .319 only once, in 1934, his last season with the Cubs, when injuries had finally caught up with him. He was instrumental in two Cubs World Series runs (1929 and 1932), achieving a .378/.410/.432 line, scoring five runs, and racking up seven RBI over the course of the two Series. In Stephenson's best offensive season, 1929, each of the three Cubs starting outfielders (Stephenson, Cuyler, and Wilson) had over 100 RBIs, the only time such a feat has been accomplished in National League history.

At .336, Riggs Stephenson's lifetime batting average is the highest of any eligible batter who is not in the Hall of Fame, ranks 20th all-time in Major League Baseball, and still leads all players in the history of the Chicago National League Ball Club (tied with Bill Madlock). Admittedly, his batting numbers were inflated somewhat by playing during the live-ball era, and he never led the league in batting average (or, indeed, in any offensive category except doubles in 1927). Still, he was a patient hitter, walking exactly twice as often as he struck out (494 to 247), and he could slug a little, leading to a lifetime .880 OPS (.868 with the Cubs).

Although there is some truth to the standard "what might have been" narrative, Stephenson's career was far from a failure. Had he played 50 years later, when his shoulder could have been surgically repaired and he consequently could have had much more playing time, Stephenson would certainly be in the Hall of Fame. Were it not for the incomparable Billy Williams, Riggs Stephenson would probably be remembered as the greatest Cubs left fielder of all time.

He played for a few years in the minor leagues after his major league career ended abruptly in 1934 due to the accumulated injuries, finally retiring in 1939. Stephenson returned to his home state of Alabama, where he was inducted into the state Sports Hall of Fame in 1971. He ran a car dealership in Tuscaloosa for many years, and passed away there on November 15, 1985.

Riggs Stephenson's career stats at baseball-reference.com

0 recs | Comment 22 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Darn typos.
Of course, that's supposed to be 1898. I'll fix it.

by Al on Dec 4, 2006 8:51 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

Otherwise....
Another great written article.  I look forward to when we get to the top 50.

by Neifi Puppy on Dec 4, 2006 9:03 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

Great article
However, I strongly diagree with the ranking.  Riggs Stephenson should not be one spot ahead of Manny Trillo.  Why is he so low?

by VS on Dec 4, 2006 10:48 AM CST   0 recs

I agree
I think he's too low. Great article, however.

by danimal15 on Dec 4, 2006 10:52 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

I discounted...
... his numbers a bit because of the era in which he played.

by Al on Dec 4, 2006 11:10 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

I figured as much
It's your list, so you can do whatever you want, of course.  But I disagree on this one.  Even when you take into account the high scoring era he played in, he was still a very productive player.  I'll spare you the stats, but IMO, he's among the top 30.

by VS on Dec 4, 2006 11:17 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

I'm not sure I would say top 30
but I was surprised he wasn't top 50.  Overall, I haven't had too many significant disagreements where players have ranked.  This is probably the first one for me.  It will be interesting to see who ranks higher.  

by rlpete on Dec 4, 2006 11:29 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

Why discount his numbers?
What were they doing in the late '20s and early '30s?  Steroids?  Yes, that was an era of offense, but it would seem like legitimate offense.  There were plenty of good pitchers then too.
"Don't complain to me about the stormy weather, boys. Just bring the ship into port." --Steve Stone, September 2004

by ctcoff99 on Dec 4, 2006 5:44 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Not that many.
ERA's were higher, in general, in that era as well.

I probably could have ranked Stephenson somewhat higher.

by Al on Dec 4, 2006 6:00 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Forget about it...
Don't worry, be happy...These write-ups are excellent, it really doesn't matter the order (but Dawson better be Number 1!!!!, just kidding)...Part of the fun of it all is the complaints about the rankings and how bent some seem to get about it...Now if George Mitterwald is going to appear soon then we have some problems, LOL!

by DudeVf1 on Dec 8, 2006 12:53 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

You need not worry.
I don't think it will come as any surprise for me to tell you that Mitterwald did NOT make the list.

by Al on Dec 8, 2006 7:04 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

What's
legitimate offense?  In the context of his time, Stephenson's gaudy batting averages did not contribute to wins as much as they would have in the 1960s, for example.

If it takes 6 or 7 runs to win a game like it did in Stephenson's era, then his production is not worth as much as it would have in the 1960s, where it took 3 or 4 runs to win a game.

And if you want to give them credit for not taking steroids, I can give a huge black mark on everyone from that era for what they did ban--African-American players.  How would Riggs have hit if he had to face Satchel Page, Bullet Joe Rogan or Martin Dihigo?  Heck, one could add Eiji Sawamura to that list too, although he wasn't banned (Connie Mack tried to sign him) as much as he had cultural reasons to stay home.

I think Al's got Stephenson about twenty places too low (His OBP is awfully good even for his era), but I also think he's got a good, legitimate argument for why he placed him where he did and I respect that.

A little song, a little dance. A little seltzer down your pants

by Josh77 on Dec 4, 2006 7:16 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Relax, man.
I was curious about why his numbers were "discounted" and I simply asked the question.  I'm not saying I don't respect any of these decisions.  As for what is "legitimate" offense.  Come on.  You're a baseball fan.  You know what I was talking about.  
"Don't complain to me about the stormy weather, boys. Just bring the ship into port." --Steve Stone, September 2004

by ctcoff99 on Dec 4, 2006 7:56 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

No
frankly I don't know what you are talking about.  Why should I?

I'm guessing you are saying that they didn't take steroids.  But I find that argument to be silly for many reasons--ones that would take a book to go into (and other people have).  But there is no way of estimating how much, if any, offense is increased by steroids.  (Don't forget, pitchers take steroids too.)  Honestly, I don't understand how people who think everyone in baseball is currently on the juice can even remain a baseball fan.

Why are his stats legitimate when he didn't play against black players?  

A little song, a little dance. A little seltzer down your pants

by Josh77 on Dec 4, 2006 8:56 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

So let me get this right....
Everyone who played pre-1947 is illegitimate and should be completely eliminated from the record books?  Is that what you're saying?  Look, I know segregation of any kind was a horrible injustice, so you can get off your moral soapbox now.  I think we can all agree on that.  But I happen to think that there are some Hall of Famers who played before 1947 who are deserving of being there.  I also think there are a lot of cheaters in modern baseball who deserve all the bad press they are getting.  I can also see that this conversation could go on all night, so I'll take the last word on this one.  Over and out.  
"Don't complain to me about the stormy weather, boys. Just bring the ship into port." --Steve Stone, September 2004

by ctcoff99 on Dec 4, 2006 9:07 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

The Stevenson ranking looks especially
low because it follows Manny Trillo whose 1977 All-Star game invite was his only honor as a Cub.  Fearing there are Ron Ceys and his ilk to come, it may make the Stevenson ranking look even lower.  

 I'm sure Al chose the greatest 100 of all-time to kill the offseason but it is sad to see what well over a century of baseball has produced in the way of "great" players.  Maybe it should be called the Cubs' Hundred Best Players.  Or the Cubs Hundred Least Objectionable Players.

 Anyway, good idea, Al.  You wanted to spur debate and you have.

by TR on Dec 5, 2006 8:59 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

There seems to be
a definite bias to Cubs of the 60s and later.  Stephenson, Demaree, English, Malone, Galan, and that gang were before our time, but they made the Cubs the dominant NL team for the first half of the 20th century.  Since 1945, they have generally sucked.

Most of the articles, though, have been great.  Especially the ones that have gone beyond stats and brought to life the heroes of the past.

BTW, SABR has a biography series online.  It might be a good idea to cycle the ones they don't have after they've been published here.

by Clark Addison on Dec 4, 2006 11:13 AM CST   0 recs

I expect that some of the players
you mention and especially Galan and English are yet to come.  In fact, I would expect that a majority of the top 50 would be pre-60's.  

by rlpete on Dec 4, 2006 11:16 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

Exactly.
Most of the greatest players in the history of the Cubs, for obvious reasons, were pre-1945 players, and you'll see them higher on the list.

Not ALL of them, of course, and I think you can figure out who those players will be, and (approximately) where they will rank.

by Al on Dec 4, 2006 11:21 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

Riggs stiffed
Riggs has always been overlooked.  I believe he is one of the few outstanding players NOT included in the walk-of-fame @ Wrigley.

by KedzieKid on Dec 4, 2006 11:44 AM CST   0 recs

One of two eras I missed.
There are two eras of Cubs baseball that I would have loved to have seen.  One is the Leo Durocher era (1966-1972).  The other is the Depression era, and particularly the era of 1929 to 1938, in which the Cubs won four pennants.  Unfortunately, those four pennant winners did not fare well at all in the World Series.  
"Don't complain to me about the stormy weather, boys. Just bring the ship into port." --Steve Stone, September 2004

by ctcoff99 on Dec 4, 2006 5:47 PM CST   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Who_sleeve0005_small
Funniest Play You've Seen In A Cubs Game
Heart-cubs_small
Dempster signs
Cubs_sweep_small
Report: Cubs close to resigning Dempster
Cubstom_small
Kerry Wood speaks on being let go
Theriot_small
Wood done as a Cub? It appears so.

Recent FanPosts

Weasels_small
Looking Forward: Cubs Convention 2009-What to expect?
Yelloncard_small
Mesa Solar Sox In AFL Championship Game Saturday
Small
BE IN A CUBS MOVIE!
Small
Hendry, Kenney and Blagojevich at lunch
Doggie_small
Best of the 21st-25th man
Sandberg_small
Free Agents No One's Talking About
Small
Billy Corgan blames Eddie Vedder for 2008 Cubs Loss
Small
The 40 man and Rule 5
Small
Aaron Heilman
Headshot_110533_small
D'backs, Rockies looking to move from Tucson ST

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

Opening Day 2009 will be in...

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Pics of the press conference for the Winter Classic
Yet another article.."Pads say Cubs still interested in you-know-who...."
via tbn0.google.com

Google Images has released photos from Time magazine.  There are some great classic photos for the Cubs, including this one of the scoreboard.
Ryan Dempster's Contract-Extension Conference Call
Cubs Sign Demps to a 4-year!
You throw like a girl! Would you like a job?
Mark Grace at the Utah/San Diego State football game.  He was enshrined in the SDS Hall of Fame.
Tank McNamara Takes On The Cubs Again
Randy Johnson actually could become a Cub
Neat Free Agent Tracker

Post_icon New FanShot All FanShots Carrot-mini

Google Ads


Editor-in-Chief

Yelloncard_small Al

Editorial Cartoonist

Toonmike_small toonmike

Photographer

Dsc_0139_small holy mackerel

ad

Site Meter