The Bleachers As They Used To Be
David sent me some photos taken during the 2005 season, so you can remember the bleachers the way they were for 68 years, from 1937 through 2005.
Looking at these, and knowing what's being built there now, they already seem like ancient history.
Thursday has been a usual day for me to run by the ballpark for photos -- I had to work today, so I may do that later, but right now it's raining pretty hard, with the threat of thunderstorms later this afternoon, followed by snow and wind and cold tonight.
Brrr. Enjoy these summertime photos.
Also today, ESPN.com posted their first power rankings of 2006. The Cubs rank just behind the Astros -- but both rank well behind Milwaukee.
Top: Two views outside Wrigley Field, 7/16/2005; two views of entrance ramps, 7/2/2005
Bottom: Another view of ramp, 7/2/2005; beer shack on ramp, 7/2/2005 (note sign: ATM Machine, which would stand for "Automatic Teller Machine Machine")
Photos by David Sameshima
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
beautiful site
by schmidthead on Feb 16, 2006 3:45 PM CST reply actions
The Brewers?
That's depressing.
The back-page coverage of the Cubs in the Trib sports section today got me pretty excited. I think Pierre is going to be a huge boost.
The Brewers.
by Tom @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Feb 16, 2006 4:10 PM CST reply actions
to say nothing
the more forecasts i read, the more i realize that my view of the cubs as a likely fourth-place team is really pretty widely held. not sure what that means.
by gaius marius on Feb 17, 2006 1:30 PM CST up reply actions
Maybe...
Or maybe it just means nothing.
by sparkles721 on Feb 17, 2006 10:51 PM CST up reply actions
It means...
Those power rankings depressed me
by mike @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Feb 16, 2006 4:14 PM CST reply actions
Actually between 15 and 20...
That being said, I suppose there is still a chance to move up before Spring Training; if there is any real chance of making a big move (and it's not just cliche' speak from the GM).
I would move closer to 15th best, maybe two steps above where ESPN rates them. But the all-important top 10........no. Can't see it.
Still plenty of time left though, Jim Hendry......
;-)
by The Jade Scorpion on Feb 16, 2006 7:04 PM CST reply actions
Wood
Ummm . . .
He did some PFP work from the mound, but he wasn't throwing any pitches, just (pretty lamely) imitating the throwing action.
by Tom @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Feb 17, 2006 8:06 AM CST up reply actions
It was raining...
But back on topic, I don't care about ESPN.com's power rankings. I think you all know who is at the top of the Sparkles' power rankings. ;)
I still find it mean to mention absolutely nothing about the team at all and just mention the bleacher expansion. They didn't mention any names at all, but oh well.
Sparkles power rankings
From your posts, I'd suspect you rank just Carlos Zambrano all by himself atop power rankings without a team.
by One of Als Pals on Feb 16, 2006 10:44 PM CST up reply actions
LOL!
by sparkles721 on Feb 16, 2006 10:58 PM CST up reply actions

by 


























