Book Review: "Game Of Shadows"

copyright 1973, universal press syndicate
That's what Barry Bonds is. Guilty! Guilty, guilty, guilty!!
It's so clear (and not "The Clear", one of the "designer steroids" Bonds took as described in the book) that I cannot imagine anyone who's read this book -- and I highly recommend this to all of you, because Bonds is, for better or worse, going to be very much in the news in 2006, having hit his 711th HR yesterday, and also since he is now under investigation for possible perjury charges, in that he is thought to have possibly lied to the original grand jury investigating the BALCO steroid scandal.
There are a lot of subplots in this exhaustively-investigated book. First, we learn a bit about Barry Bonds and how he grew up, the pampered son of a major league player, the only black kid in his neighborhood, and how that shaped him as he was growing up -- as the most talented athlete in his high school, and also at Arizona State. There is a telling passage about his time there that foretells some of the ways in which Bonds has acted since he became a major league player:
Brock was considered tough, demanding and distant. But even he found himself making a different set of rules for Bonds, excusing his objectionable behavior because of his tremendous talent. The coddling started from the day Bonds arrived on campus driving a new Pontiac Trans Am. When his teammates first saw the shiny black car, it was parked in the coach's parking space.
In 1984, Bonds and some teammates were caught breaking curfew, and Bonds mouthed off when the coach confronted then. Momentarily pushed past his limit, Brock blew up and kicked Bonds off the team. After he calmed down, the coach told the other players he had suspended Bonds and asked them to vote on whether to let him return; Brock was confident they would want their best player back. But Bonds was so unpopular that his teammates voted to kick him off the team for good. Before the incident spun further out of control, the coach ordered a second vote, and Bonds was reinstated.
Bonds apparently got the idea to begin taking steroids during the 1998 HR chase between Sammy Sosa and Mark McGwire; he felt he -- not they -- was the best all-around player in baseball and couldn't stand it that they were getting all the adulation. He told his then-girlfriend that "the powers that be wouldn't let Sosa win it, that they wanted the white guy to have the record."
I'm not making this stuff up, so please don't think I am being a racist here, since I am not. All of this is well-documented in the book.
There's a lot more, and the book goes into great detail about how BALCO was formed by Victor Conte. You may have seen Conte's self-serving interview on 20/20 after this all broke into the open; what I did not know is that Conte was a self-made man, a street-hustler type who was once a member of the Bay Area funk band Tower of Power. Fascinating character study.
The book names quite a few baseball names, most of which are now public, and also goes into detail on how BALCO provided steroids to various Olympic athletes, including Kelli White and Marion Jones, and how there was a race against time to "clean up" some 2004 Olympians so that the entire USA track team wouldn't be disqualified, since Olympic testing standards are much more stringent than those in baseball.
Barry Bonds is a very sad, sad case. He IS a tremendously talented baseball player -- or at least has been; you can tell that his knees are just about shot and he may be trying to hang on just long enough to hit HR #715, so he can have the most for any left-handed hitter -- and was a Hall of Fame player even BEFORE his fateful 1998 decision to do steroids. He is NOT a very nice human being, which is too bad; had be been so, he'd surely have been the most admired athlete of his generation.
Instead, he is mostly reviled, except, apparently, by Giants fans, who don't seem to care about any of this if he helps their team win. I cannot say how I'd feel if he were a Cub; I can only say I'm glad he's not, so I don't have to make that decision. It is instructive to note that when this book was released and excerpts published in Sports Illustrated, Bonds' public statements didn't deny any of the allegations in the book -- all he did was criticize the reporters for supposedly leaking sealed grand jury transcripts.
The current investigation should worry Barry Bonds. The book details a similar investigation into NBA star Chris Webber, and notes that Webber only avoided jail time
This is an important book, and the story told within is not over. All of you should read it.
And my personal opinion is -- I absolutely hate the adulation that ESPN is currently giving to Barry Bonds; he's probably hit about 100 more HR than he would have with a "normal" career progression, and it is my hope that he never, ever hits another one.
0 recs |
169
comments
Comments
As to the final paragraph
In my personal opinion - with or without steroids Barry Bonds is still one of the greatest if not the greatest hitter of all time and yes I do wish he was a little less of an a-hole.
by Will71081 on Apr 27, 2006 10:19 AM CDT 0 recs
Sure there is...
Bonds was healthy through the 2004 season, when he had 703 HR. I still believe that's about 100 more than he would have had without steroids.
Will, you've been a Bonds defender throughout many threads we've had about him. Read the book and you won't be.
by Al on
Apr 27, 2006 10:23 AM CDT
up
0 recs
I refuse to give my money to these writers
He is the scapegoat for the entire steroids era, which started in the late 70's.
Another problem I have is that there is no proof that steroids actually help or hurt homerun numbers. Climate change could have as much to do with it, who knows?
The book will not answer these questions, I am intelligent, I understand that Bonds probably used steroids or something else, though I won't officially declare that he did until the positive test comes through.
In the past I defend Bonds, because I respect his amazing baseball abilities, and people throw that out immediately just because he "allegedly" used steroids.
by Will71081 on
Apr 27, 2006 10:32 AM CDT
up
0 recs
"Until a positive test comes through"
No one is saying that steroids make you hit more homeruns, though I personally believe that the added strength could push a warning track ball out of the park. What they do is help players recover faster from injuries and prolong their careers.
I think it's very telling that, through all of this, Bonds has never once said "I've never used steroids." What he keeps saying is "I've never had a postiive test." Kind of like what my guilty clients used to say. It was never "I didn't do it," it was always "they can't prove I did it."
And, once again, HGH hasn't even entered into this scenario yet. The only person in baseball I dislike more than Bonds is Don Fehr.
by cubbiejulie on
Apr 27, 2006 10:45 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Why limit it to Fehr?
by DSZ on
Apr 27, 2006 10:51 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Did I say that don't blame anyone else?
by cubbiejulie on
Apr 27, 2006 10:54 AM CDT
up
0 recs
For sure
My respect for the game is greater than my love for anyone who cheated regardless, of whether or not they played for my favorite team.
by elscorcho0682 on
Apr 27, 2006 11:16 AM CDT
up
0 recs
I agree
by cubbiejulie on
Apr 27, 2006 11:17 AM CDT
up
0 recs
I agree with the recovery part
The net effect on the amount of games Bonds could play in his career may be negligible, he may actually play less than the total amount of games he could have potentially played.
by Will71081 on
Apr 27, 2006 10:51 AM CDT
up
0 recs
I think Selig and MLB are hoping that the focus of
They are hoping that if something comes out of the investigation they can erase Bonds name from the record books(which would be deplorable in my opinion) and they will bear no responsibility for anything. Barry Bonds is being used as a scape goat, and it is made easier because he is just not very likeable.
by Will71081 on
Apr 27, 2006 10:55 AM CDT
up
0 recs
You realize
I think it's very telling that they never claimed that anything in the book was untrue.
by elscorcho0682 on
Apr 27, 2006 11:31 AM CDT
up
0 recs
I have to tell you...
This I guarantee.
Also goes for jaw structure growing at hulk proportions (AHEM, Sammy...), but whatever.
by Sarah Hope on
Apr 27, 2006 10:54 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Or your nose
by cubbiejulie on
Apr 27, 2006 10:55 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Quick
by Sarah Hope on
Apr 27, 2006 10:56 AM CDT
up
0 recs
HA!
Are you sure you're not just protecting your fragile pride.
Talent or no talent...Barry Bonds is a classless loser who cheated for a good part of his career, and with proof, all your arguments are tossed out the window.
Read the book man, be objective for a change. We all listen to your defenses of the man.
by Kinky Reggae on
Apr 27, 2006 12:05 PM CDT
up
0 recs
WIth proof that steroids causes increased homeruns
by Will71081 on
Apr 27, 2006 12:26 PM CDT
up
0 recs
There's a huge difference between
I assume Bonds did steroids and I still defend Bonds the player. I could care less about what kind of person he is. My appreciation for him and virtually every other athlete is limited to what they do on the field.
Bonds played baseball before the steroid era and he plays during the steroid era. In both eras, he was among if not the absolute best player in the game. Try as we might, the question of what physical impact steroids has on the game of baseball is a question that we will not be able to answer. That's because we're never going to be able to isolate the users from the non-users to perform such a study.
Was Bonds able to recover from the wear and tear of a 162 game schedule faster because of steroids? Undoubtedly. So were the perhaps hundreds of other hitters who he outslugged over the past few years. And so were the perhaps hundreds of pitchers who he was hitting home runs off all season.
by DSZ on
Apr 27, 2006 10:49 AM CDT
up
0 recs
What about the home run boom in 2006?
The most important thing to me is that I just don't care. Like Will said, Bonds is being used as the scapegoat and the whole perjury investigation is a witch hunt. They are never going to be able to prove the guy lied. Why they are even trying is just to undermine the home run totals he has amassed.
Leave the guy alone. As far as i'm concerned these books are nothing more than trash and should be used to start fires. I find it interesting that the leak of the grand jury testimony hasn't been sought, but the person in question is being investigated for possible perjury charges. What kind of fucked up system is this?
by Maddog on
Apr 27, 2006 6:52 PM CDT
up
0 recs
And one more thing...
by Maddog on
Apr 27, 2006 6:56 PM CDT
up
0 recs
No more Maddog?
by LT on
Apr 27, 2006 8:45 PM CDT
up
0 recs
This is one of those comments
by elscorcho0682 on
Apr 27, 2006 9:08 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I don't think
In 1998 alone, he hit .303, with 37 homers and 122 RBIs. At that rate, of course he would be considered one of the greatest hitters of all time.
But I certainly believe that his previous talent alone doesn't absolve him from the consequences of his actions.
If an Olympic track star tested positive for steroids, the committee wouldn't even think of saying, "Well...it doesn't matter. He/she probably would have won that race anyways." And I don't see any reason why we should hold Bonds (or anyone else) to a different standard.
by elscorcho0682 on
Apr 27, 2006 11:28 AM CDT
up
0 recs
That's the problem, though everyone else
Bonds is being unfairly hoisted to the top of the scandal when he is just a symptom of the problem that resulted from MLB not having any official steroid testing policy prior to 2003.
by Will71081 on
Apr 27, 2006 11:32 AM CDT
up
0 recs
I agree
This "victim" tag on Bonds has got to stop. He's the one who decided to take steroids. He's the one who decided that his already-hall-of-fame-caliber stats just weren't good enough. Regardless of MLB's testing policy, steroids were still against the law. And now we're supposed to feel bad for him because he's about to break 714 and people are starting to publicly wonder how on earth he got that way?
by elscorcho0682 on
Apr 27, 2006 11:39 AM CDT
up
0 recs
So you are saying it is all fine and well
I know Bonds is an a-hole, but he should not be the focus of the investigation. There is really no point in investigating anymore, they are not going to uncover anything nor shed any light anything new. People will believe what they want to believe.
MLB has an adequate drug policy now and that is the best thing that could come out of this. Scapegoating Bonds may make some of the Bond's haters feel better, but it doesn't solve anything.
by Will71081 on
Apr 27, 2006 11:47 AM CDT
up
0 recs
No,
What I'm saying is that this "unfair treatment" by the league does not by one iota diminish the fact that he STILL cheated to get to where he is today! You're trying to force blame on Major League Baseball, when it was BONDS who decided that he was going to take steroids.
I think they should go after EVERYONE who's suspected to have taken steroids - Bonds, McGwire, Sosa, Palmeiro, Sheffield, and anyone else they can get their hands on. I don't think baseball has correctly handled the issue over the years, but again, that does NOT take anything away from the fact that Bonds did what he did. And we should not give him a free pass just because "it's not fair."
by elscorcho0682 on
Apr 27, 2006 11:54 AM CDT
up
0 recs
And the hell Canseco is not included
He's a classless bum and people defending him is humerous.
by Kinky Reggae on
Apr 27, 2006 12:07 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Your spelling
by Will71081 on
Apr 27, 2006 12:28 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Just playing
by Will71081 on
Apr 27, 2006 12:28 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Look Will
It just seems like your refusal to read it (for reasons that appear to be bogus) is a claim that you are unwilling to see if what it has to say is valid or not.
If you read it and come back and say the same thingm then you are entitled to that but if you tell me lobster tastes like crap and then refuse to try it, I will call BS on you.
by Kinky Reggae on
Apr 27, 2006 12:32 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Az, have you read it?
A book that would be more relevant to prove the point to me, would be one that shows statistically the impact of steroids on a baseball player. Also one that shows statistically that Barry Bonds actually had a leg up on the competition, since steroids and other PEDs were available and used by many other baseball players since the 70's. So if you find a book that shows first that there is an actual link between steroids and performance and one that shows that Bonds benefitted moreso than anyone else did in the league, I will stop defending Bonds and admit that Bonds should be stricken from the records.
You catch my drift.
by Will71081 on
Apr 27, 2006 1:14 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Re
The Doonesbury comic that opens this thread is ironic to me because you remind me of a teacher I had in high school. During the Watergate stories in the Washington Post, she and I got into an argument about whether Nixon was guilty. She finally couldn't take the possibility that her idol was actually the lying, cheating, guilty SOB that everyone had been saying he was since his days as a Congressman and started crying.
This isn't just about Bonds taking steriods. This is about a member of the asshole HOF who has less self-awareness than Pete Rose getting his well-deserved comeupance.
Guys like Matt Lawton take steriods because they're barely hanging on to an MLB job. Barry Bonds took steriods because being the best player wasn't good enough for his massive ego; he needed to have the spotlight shining down on him and was miffed it wasn't.
Karma's a bitch. Why you want to share his ride is a question well worth asking yourself.
by Jed Taylor on
Apr 27, 2006 3:43 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Seems like you are a little off topic
He is not the best person in the world, but this is not Watergate either. If we were to use the Watergate analogy, Bonds is not Nixon, he might be a low level staffer, a symptom of the problem not the actual problem itself.
by Will71081 on
Apr 27, 2006 4:31 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I think
;)
by cubbiejulie on
Apr 27, 2006 4:32 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Well
by cubbiejulie on
Apr 27, 2006 4:05 PM CDT
up
0 recs
almost done with it.
by Kinky Reggae on
Apr 27, 2006 4:49 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Are you kidding me?
Every medical study on steroids has shown that they increase muscle mass and strength (including "fast twitch" muscle tissue), improve recovery time for workouts, allow quicker healing from injuries, and thus make you stronger and allow you to work out more and longer and with a decreased risk of injury.
So being stronger and able to hit a baseball farther (thus more often out of the park), being able to swing a bat faster (thanks to increased fast twitch muscle speed), avoid injury, and in general become a superhuman sized freak at a point in your career when your abilities should by all rights be deteriorating (or at least not improving exponentially) has nothing to do with baseball performance?
Look, Bonds cheated. Don't give me the "it wasn't outlawed in baseball" argument - it was illegal in the real world, period. He deserves scrutiny and criticism for what HE chose to do, especially since he's now near to passing some of baseball's most cherished records. Its ludicrous to argue that there is no link between steroids and increased performance - if there wasn't, why would ANY player take them?
by Chadnudj on
Apr 27, 2006 4:59 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I eat Broccoli
by Will71081 on
Apr 27, 2006 6:45 PM CDT
up
0 recs
This isn't even
by elscorcho0682 on
Apr 27, 2006 6:59 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Again I understand what steroids do,
by Will71081 on
Apr 28, 2006 7:58 AM CDT
up
0 recs
If I injected heroin
That's like saying someone shouldn't be charged with attempted murder, because after all, they didn't succeed in what they originally set out to do.
How can you possibly agree with the fact that steroids increase muscle mass and decrease recovery time, but then turn around and say that increased muscle mass isn't proven to help athletes?
Please, for Pete's sake, just read the book!
by elscorcho0682 on
Apr 28, 2006 9:37 AM CDT
up
0 recs
the book isn't going to answer
there are two perspectives here -- one of society, the other of baseball.
again, i don't think anyone would disagree that steroids have physical effects.
what the net result of those effects are, however, in any analysis that isn't uselessly simplistic, cannot be known. they vary depending on the type, the usage, the activity of the player. whether and how they help or hinder isn't a black-or-white issue -- there's a vast spectrum of possible results. and there's no way to know where bonds falls on that spectrum.
from a purely sporting perspective, there's little to be done. virtually everyone in the game cheats, some more than others. baseball, it has to be remembered, is an amoral game and had no rules against anything he did.
so if he's to be punished -- and i agree, there's room for it and it may well happen -- let it be by society through law, not baseball. what he may have done is clearly illegal.
by gaius marius on
Apr 28, 2006 10:03 AM CDT
up
0 recs
agree with you entirely gaius
by Will71081 on
Apr 28, 2006 10:20 AM CDT
up
0 recs
That's fine
From a moral standpoint, that is. Do you agree this is a problem throughout baseball, and you would rather see baseball played without cheating? (I can't imagine why you wouldn't.) Fine. Let's fix it, by whatever means necessary. We have to expose one of the most blatant users? Fine. We have to expose users that we never suspected? Fine. Just fix it.
by elscorcho0682 on
Apr 28, 2006 10:32 AM CDT
up
0 recs
I think you are missing the point,
by Will71081 on
Apr 28, 2006 10:44 AM CDT
up
0 recs
If you've listened to even a word I've said
You're twisting my words to fit your own point of view so that you can claim yourself and Bonds as martyrs, and I don't appreciate it.
I understand that cheating has always been a part of the game - but you can't tell me honestly that that means we should allow it to continue unchecked. You're a baseball fan, aren't you? You'd like to see games played fairly? I know I sure would.
Listen to someone else's opinion for a change instead of just attacking people's concepts of "the real world."
by elscorcho0682 on
Apr 28, 2006 10:58 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Again,
by elscorcho0682 on
Apr 28, 2006 11:00 AM CDT
up
0 recs
You should read your own comments and
I never said cheating should be unregulated, but it will always be a part of the game and there is really nothing we can do about it now.
From spitballs to corked bats, to stealing signs and cutting the corner on bases, baseball players always look for an edge.
The only good that is going to come of this investigation has already happened. Baseball now has a strict policy on steroids. Going back in time isn't going to solve any problems nor save any records.
by Will71081 on
Apr 28, 2006 11:09 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Yeah, I'll be sure to do that
I keep saying I'm done talking about this...my self control sucks.
by elscorcho0682 on
Apr 28, 2006 11:22 AM CDT
up
0 recs
to fix it
there's no set of administrative laws that's going to suppress this, just as no effort of government will ever stamp out drug use or pornography in the broader population. there's simply too much incentive to try and too mush technology enabling -- and too little responsibility to conform to the social compact in an age of rampant individualism.
i daresay that there is no fix short of real and widespread social disaster -- things we're only now seeing the beginnings of in the last century of the western experience. only then, i suspect, will people begin to appreciate how being bound to a limiting compact not of their choosing can preserve them from themselves and be the guarantor of pragmatic liberty.
by gaius marius on
Apr 28, 2006 11:09 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Let's not get out of control Gaius
You, unlike many of us, look to instill change in the greater society as a whole. Your right. I look at the smaller picture. There are in fact ways to eliminate cheating in this day and age AND , the means to punish past cheating if it is discovered. At the very least, the records that have been set, ought to stand alone if they appear to have been set free of cheating. And I am not talking about coffee, that is absurd. Apples and oranges...heck apples and broccoli man...not even in the same class as one another.
by Kinky Reggae on
Apr 28, 2006 12:12 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Well said, Al
by cubbiejulie on Apr 27, 2006 10:26 AM CDT 0 recs
May 1-3
by elscorcho0682 on
Apr 27, 2006 11:18 AM CDT
up
0 recs
I know
by Sarah Hope on
Apr 27, 2006 12:29 PM CDT
up
0 recs
There I go again
by elscorcho0682 on
Apr 27, 2006 12:32 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Oh no worries!
by Sarah Hope on
Apr 27, 2006 12:41 PM CDT
up
0 recs
The NFL Draft is coming up soon too...
by hokie316 on
Apr 27, 2006 12:39 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Haha
by elscorcho0682 on
Apr 27, 2006 12:43 PM CDT
up
0 recs
ESPN
There's a reason the term "sportsmanship" has the word "sport" in it. Cheating is NOT sportsmanship, and anyone who cheats should no longer fit the definition of "sportsman."
But I digress. ESPN also needs to quit with their round-the-clock draft coverage. I'm done now.
by elscorcho0682 on
Apr 27, 2006 11:12 AM CDT
up
0 recs
good ol' ESPN
by jrm78 on
Apr 27, 2006 11:30 AM CDT
up
0 recs
ESPN are total Bonds whores
questions Bud's investigation re Mitchell etc as
not being sufficiently independent. I agree but
ESPN itself is worse. They are wrapped up with
Barry and his silly "reality" show financially
The thing that annoys me the most is that
Giants games now take precedence over
ALL over NL scores and are now listed OUT
of sequence ( i.e time) EVEN WHEN BARRY IS NOT
PLAYING. How stupid is this ?
by jessica on
Apr 27, 2006 1:54 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I always
:)
by Sarah Hope on
Apr 27, 2006 2:47 PM CDT
up
0 recs
This is so difficult.....
You might be glad that Bond's isn't on the Cubs, but we'll always have to deal with the Sosa legacy, which for some reason methinks still isn't quite over yet: no one disappears like he did and not come back (to say something on the record) at some point.
I'm going to grab this book Al, and I share your distaste of Bonds, but regarding steroids, I believe making him the poster child lets others (namely the commissioner's office) off the hook who are as culpable, if not more so for allwoing it to reach the proportions it did.
by PopeFlick on Apr 27, 2006 10:55 AM CDT 0 recs
Saturday Tickets??
by BillHoldenFan on Apr 27, 2006 11:40 AM CDT 0 recs

