Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Win or Lose, Boston Celtics' New Big 3 Era A Success

Baseball Is A Marathon, Not A Sprint

Words to live by.

Unfortunately, the facts from last night don't make that very easy: the Cubs lost 8-3 to the Padres, their seventh straight loss and completing the first-ever four-game sweep by the Padres over the Cubs in San Diego.

Here's a suggestion: do what I did. I had to go to sleep for work, as usual. I turned the game off after the top of the fourth -- when it was still manageable at 3-1.

Moments later, that's when the Padres started smacking the ball all over the yard, four runs including a Brian Giles HR, and when it was over Greg Maddux had his shortest outing in three years, and his ERA, which two starts ago was 1.35, went up more than a run, and now sits at 3.64.

So much for the brave talk (no pun intended) of an All-Star berth for Maddux, or for what some of you have begun to clamor for, a trade for him somewhere while his value is high. Actually, during the three innings I saw, I thought Maddux hit his spots pretty well, had his pitches moving and mixed them up well. He issued two walks -- one intentional -- and both came back to bite him. I'd have walked Giles intentionally, too, to pitch to a guy who had six RBI in 75 at-bats coming into the game.

The Cubs look bad, true. But the Padres are the hottest team in baseball right now. Sometimes running into a team like that magnifies what's making you look bad.

Somewhere in yesterday's comments I wrote about the 1977 Cubs, who on June 28 were 47-22, 8.5 games ahead in first place.

Look at that game log linked above very carefully. The '77 Cubs were 7-9 on April 30. On June 30 they were 47-24; they went 40-15 for the months of May and June (in fact, it was 40-13 before they lost the last two games in June). That's probably the best two months I've ever seen the Cubs have, even better than any two months you can pick out of their recent playoff seasons. They had a five-game winning streak, three streaks of six, and one of seven. At no time during those two months did they ever lose more than two straight.

Why do I mention this now? Because as good as that Cub team looked, that's as bad as this one looks. And it is true -- no team is as bad as they look when they're losing, and no team is quite as good as they look when they're on a streak like the '77 Cubs had. And in fact, that team wasn't that good -- they had .500 talent, and finished exactly .500, and had to lose their last five games to do it.

Yes, the Cubs look awful right now. Yes, talent is being misused (why was Freddie Bynum used to pinch-hit yet again last night, when the recalled Ryan Theriot was right there on the bench? Is Dusty going to sit him too, like he sat Michael Restovich for three weeks? Incidentally, Restovich cleared waivers and was outrighted to Iowa). Yes, the talent that is there is not producing -- example: Michael Barrett, whose numbers are still decent, hasn't driven in a run since April 21.

But the team has played 31 games. The Colorado Rockies have played 33, and are in first place. Do you seriously expect them to be there at season's end? Or even a month from now? The Angels were widely predicted to win the AL West. They're 14-19. They're a better team than that.

I know this Cub team is flawed. They need help, and Jim Hendry ought to go out and get some -- right now. Kerry Wood will be back soon -- maybe, as was suggested in last night's comments, he might even be pushed up and start Friday at Wrigley Field. Frankly, I think teams make too much of rehab starts. If he's ready -- and based on his rehab start, it appears that he is -- why send him all the way to Fresno to throw against Triple-A hitters? Theriot ought to be installed at 2B for an entire week, just to see what he can do.

I'm not giving up and quitting. Don't you either. If snarking and bitching makes you feel better -- well, there's other places to do that. Don't give up. Keep the faith. It's GOT to get better.

Comment 192 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

AMEN!!
Bitching doesn't get anything done....

by ontheuptick on May 9, 2006 8:59 AM CDT reply actions  

There's a middle ground...
... and I think I have staked out that ground pretty well.

by Al Yellon on May 9, 2006 9:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed
Baseball is meant to be fun, not ruin your summer.  Sure, my summers are less enjoyable when the Cubs are terrible, but thinking they are terrible in early May doesn't make my life any better...

by ontheuptick on May 9, 2006 9:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

Exactly.
Call me a optimistic masochist... but it's the living and dying with the Cubs that makes it so spectacular.
she

by Sarah Hope on May 9, 2006 9:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

I agree
It wasn't a shot at you, it was just a general point. I think criticism/bitching is required when warranted.  I also think perspective is necessary.  I came into this season without much optimism.  Still the Cubs are going to even out.  Eventually they're going to score 7 or 8 runs and put together at least a short winning streak.  I'm not sure the Cubs are a 90-loss team, but I don't think their a contending team either.  There are just two many question marks on offense, with or without Derrek Lee.

by jolietconvict on May 9, 2006 9:30 AM CDT up reply actions  

If you don't score runs
You can't win games.  It's really that simple.  Wilbon said it on PTI and it's an interesting point -- when something happens to this team it's like they roll over (I'm paraphrasing).

I agree Al that the season is far from over.  I just wish the team would play like it's May and not August.  It's like they lose focus and then look over and see D Lee and say, "Well, the big guy isn't in to help..."

When the pitching staff is struggling or understaffed the offense has to step up and they really haven't.

I say walk Bonds every time by the way.  I hate watching a Cub be in a "highlight" for another team.

Let's hope they turn it around tonight.  

"I love winning, you know it's like, better than losing" -- Nuke Lalouche

by AlabamaCubFan on May 9, 2006 9:04 AM CDT reply actions  

Wood at Iow Friday
Looks like Wood will pitch for Iowa Friday night, the game is actually in Des Moines vs. Colorado Springs (Rockies) not at Fresno.

by noblerj on May 9, 2006 9:06 AM CDT reply actions  

White Sox
didn't teach you guys anything about an unlikely team winning it all huh?  Seesm some people use them to lie to themselves about the Cubs "Not even their own fans thought they were going to be THAT good... If you had said in the offseason this team would win the World Series noone would have believed you.." But its impossible for the Reds or Rockies to keep anything up?  Selective optimism.  Al you doa great job of lifting the spirits of the faithful through the dark times, though I fear your amount of material will be taxed heavily this year.

by mike bornemann @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on May 9, 2006 9:08 AM CDT reply actions  

You may be right...
... but it IS still WAY early.

by Al Yellon on May 9, 2006 9:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

Best two months
From my admittedly short time researching, it appears that the best two month stretch in Cubs history was August 1-September 30, 1906, when the team went 47-8.

I LOVED the 1977 team. The "little blue machine"!

"Don't worry, Joey. We'll go next year. They're in the World Series all the time" ---My grandfather to my sick father, October 10, 1945

by flyingdonut on May 9, 2006 9:09 AM CDT reply actions  

And of course, the 1906 team...
... was the team that went 116-36 and lost the WS to the White Sox.

Don't believe what you hear. I wasn't around then.

;)

by Al Yellon on May 9, 2006 10:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

FWIW...
... the best 55-game sequence in Cub history was from July 26 to September 25, 1906: 49-6.

The 40-15 I quoted from 1977 above ranks as the best such streak since 1945.

The best any Cub team has done since then, over any 55-game stretch, was 37-18, from July 3-August 30, 1984.

by Al Yellon on May 9, 2006 10:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

Dusty already said
he will pitch to Bonds.. in Today's Herald and Rich Hill the pitcher in Tuesday's tilt said " I enjoy being part of history"...

Well Rich you groove one down the middle and you'll be on the wrong side of history.. let me tell ya.

Al, you have continually called for something to happen to the team.. I agree it would be great for the Cubs to find something. So what are some possible somethings that you believe could actually HELP the offense.  That being said your typical Conine Clark and Millar argument has to be dismissed.. wake me when any of those three gets their BA above .250.  So Al.. what do you think the Cubs should do.. what other grand possibilites do you see?

by cubsfan2883 on May 9, 2006 9:11 AM CDT reply actions  

he is an idiot
more andmore in my mind everyday.  "I enjy beng a part of history?"  WTF? Win the World Series, you'll be a part of histry that way too.

by mike bornemann @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on May 9, 2006 9:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

does he
really want to be the guy to give up that homer, and see it replayed in every single highlight reel for the rest of the season

i wouldn't

by flyball on May 9, 2006 10:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

Thumbs up on that one!
""I enjy beng a part of history?"  WTF? Win the World Series, you'll be a part of histry that way too."

Damn straight!

by DrCrawdad on May 9, 2006 9:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

his last start
In Hill's last start, he was hanging meatballs over the plate left and right. I predict 2 Bonds homers tonight (sadly) and 0 the rest of the series.
The poster formerly known as CherryPoppinCubbies

by jrm78 on May 9, 2006 9:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't know, frankly..
.... as I've said, it is still WAY early to make any blockbuster deals.

They should have tried Michael Restovich in RF or 1B, instead of having him languish on the bench and then ship him back to Iowa.

Right now the best "anything they can do" is put Ryan Theriot at 2B for a week straight, just to see what he can do.

Kerry Wood will be back soon. That ought to boost morale, if nothing else.

by Al Yellon on May 9, 2006 9:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

Hill has a sore throat
it was just on the Score, Glendon may make the start.

by Santos Sorrow @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on May 9, 2006 12:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

Am I actually saying this?
Am I actually hoping that Glendon makes the start?

No...I can't be...

OK, I am. I hope Glendon gets it.

--Tim http://fridayafternoonintheuniverse.blogspot.com

by elscorcho0682 on May 9, 2006 12:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

wait a minute
You prefer Rusch who leads the NL and is tied in the whole league for most HR allowed to pitch in this series and give up the historic HR to Bonds?  By the way, thats 11 HR in only 28 IP. Behind him is Livan Hernandez who has given up 10 HR, but that's in 44 1/3 IP.
Tony U La Grange, IL

by tony412 on May 9, 2006 1:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

He's also
had a few decent moments, whereas I have yet to see anything decent from Hill.
--Tim http://fridayafternoonintheuniverse.blogspot.com

by elscorcho0682 on May 9, 2006 1:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

fair enough
Hill also gave up 2 HR in just 4 IP. I'm no math genius but I think that translates into 14 HR in 28 IP. Which would be worse than Rusch's numbers.
Tony U La Grange, IL

by tony412 on May 9, 2006 1:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

Restovich
I'm not clear on how you can justify criticizing Baker for not playing Restovich when the next line you write is that Restovich cleared waivers.  That he cleared waivers ought to be proof that the guy has no business in the major leagues.  Teams didn't claim him because he has a big contract (he doesn't).  Teams didn't claim him because they don't want him on their roster.  That's 29 other teams that agree with Baker that Restovich shouldn't be playing the major leagues.
All will be fixed in 2006

by DSZ on May 9, 2006 9:18 AM CDT reply actions  

Do you...
...honestly think teams would be rushing to claim Freddie Bynum off waivers?  No one is saying Restovich is a great options, but he can hit a little bit against lefties and he should have been used that way.

by jolietconvict on May 9, 2006 9:20 AM CDT up reply actions  

Then...
... why was Restovich on the roster in the first place? As I've said repeatedly -- putting him there and NOT playing him, along with having Bynum on the team, has pretty much given the Cubs a 23-man roster for the last three weeks.

Restovich may not be a great, or even good, player. But the fact is, we have nothing to base that on because he never played a full game.

by Al Yellon on May 9, 2006 9:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

He had two hits
what was it, against the Brewers? Again, too little to tell - but I'd rather see him up there than Bynum, who should be playing ball in Antarctica somewhere.
--Tim http://fridayafternoonintheuniverse.blogspot.com

by elscorcho0682 on May 9, 2006 12:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

Re
You know, this just smacks of more of that Hendry/Baker struggle about who really gets to decide the roster.  It's yet another reason why, if Hendry is really go stay, he's got to get a field manager he's in synch with on personnel.

by Jed Taylor on May 9, 2006 1:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Plenty of time left.
Pitching will get better, but it's not the big problem right now.

The season can be salvaged; nobody is running away just yet.  But as I've said previously, it's going to take a move by Hendry that makes a real difference, and gives the clubhouse a reason to believe in 2006.

Conine won't do that, neither will Millar.  The paper today said Hendry was on the phone with as many as 11 GMs yesterday.  I hope that's true.  But I think it's going to take more than patchwork to make this team potent enough to contend in the long-term.

Hopefully, Hendry will bring a star in that'll boost the offense and the clubhouse.  There is still time to recover, though as the team is currently constructed, there may just not be enough talent to recover.

I'd like to believe somethign will be in the works soon, and I don't mean Jeff Conine.  Perhaps I hope for too much.....

"Bite my shiny metal ass!" -- Bender Bending Rodriguez

by The Jade Scorpion on May 9, 2006 9:23 AM CDT reply actions  

What "Star" Is Available On May 9th?
n/t

Oh and btw.. Sarah if you see Julie let her know that I am not deceased of alcohol poisoning.. I shut the game off in the 5th.. and thus survived attempt one of the Chicago Cubs drinking game..

by cubsfan2883 on May 9, 2006 9:36 AM CDT up reply actions  

Haha!
I won't "see" her, since she lives in Chicago, but next time I talk to her, I'll let her know.  I have a feeling that has a great story behind it! :)
she

by Sarah Hope on May 9, 2006 9:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

I meant see in the figurative sense
Like Hill means that he would enjoy being part of history in the figurative sense.. I hope he doesn't fall to the ground with a case of whiplash though...

by cubsfan2883 on May 9, 2006 9:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

LOL
Got it.  I didn't know if you knew we lived in different places. :)
she

by Sarah Hope on May 9, 2006 9:42 AM CDT up reply actions  

You two are so alike
that you could be the same person with two unique screen names

by cubsfan2883 on May 9, 2006 9:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

Aww,
Well I take that as the highest compliment.  She's a cool chick, which are very hard to find.  But I checked with my mom and she confirmed that, sadly, we were not in fact switched at birth.

Actually, now that you mention it, where is she?  Maybe she's off sick or something... or maybe she finally had it with the Cubs and said screw you people, I'm goin' home.

she

by Sarah Hope on May 9, 2006 9:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

Wow
I'm so honored that you were all so concerned about my absence. ;)  I was, indeed, in court this morning, out in Rolling Meadows, so I've been stuck in traffic since then, and am just now back in the office.

Ah, the glamorous life of the big city lawyer. . .

"Aw, how could he lose the ball in the sun, he's from Mexico!"--Harry Caray

by cubbiejulie on May 9, 2006 12:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

BTW
if you want a good laugh, check out the game thread from last night. It was pretty entertaining.
"Aw, how could he lose the ball in the sun, he's from Mexico!"--Harry Caray

by cubbiejulie on May 9, 2006 12:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

But of course.
We thought one had fallen from the flock.
she

by Sarah Hope on May 9, 2006 12:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

well.. maybe one.
When your looking to land some talent early in the season via trade you have to look to the worst teams in the leauge... currently the Pirates, Marlins, and Nationals fit this description.  We already know that the Marlins do NOT want to trade Miguel Cabrera... so get that out of your head... but what do we know about the Pirates and Nationals?  I seem to remember fleecing the Pirates several times getting talent for peanuts.. (A-Ram anyone?) and they seem to have this RH 1b/OF on their roster that would look pretty damn good right now.. Craig Wilson.  Stick him at 1b until Lee returns and then platoon him w/Jones in right.

What about the nationals>?  10.5 games back and sinking quickly.  Do they have anyone available??  What about Alfonso Soriano?  Find a way to snag this guy and your in business.. he's hitting the hell out of the baseball right now and doing it in one of the largest parks in baseball.. Pick him up... dump BOTH hairston and perez (perez makes 2.5 million??  NO, and I repeat NO OTHER TEAM IN BASEBALL would put this guy on their 25 man roster even if they could pay him in hot dog's and beer nuts) stick him at 2b (where he would be MUCH HAPPIER) and then when Lee comes back get him in the lineup every day either at 2b/RF/LF.  

Tony Clark, Jeff Conine, Kevin Millar?  C'mon.  We'd have a better chance if Santo strapped on his legs and stepped into the box.

Just my two cents.

by Jerry Burnatterson on May 9, 2006 10:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

Just a few names.
Good call, Jerry.  I get frustrated with the whole mindset that nobody would ever make an early trade.  I just don't buy it.  I still remember Houston getting Carlos Beltran well before the trade deadline.

Some names that could be available (and chances are, if Hendry talked to 11 GMs, some of them were indeed mentioned):
Jose Vidro
Alfonso Soriano
Craig Wilson
Josh Willingham
Aubrey Huff
Miguel Cabrera (Expensive IF they'd trade him)
Luis Castillo (unlikley, but worth a phone call)

Guaranteed they'd trade these guys? No.
But you can't convince me they wouldn't hear some offers at this point.  I'm very glad to hear that Hendry is at least using his cell phone minutes.  ;-)

I hope something big is in the works!

"Bite my shiny metal ass!" -- Bender Bending Rodriguez

by The Jade Scorpion on May 9, 2006 10:47 AM CDT up reply actions  

Josh Willingham?
You have got to be kidding, why in the he-double hocky sticks would he and his 6-years of controllable interest by the Marlins be available?

by Santos Sorrow @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on May 9, 2006 12:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm not giving up and quitting. Don't you either.
When we start giving up and quitting, this board as well as several others will grow very quiet.

As to your comment about snarking and bitching, I think it wholly appropriate for any and everyone to show how frustrated they are with this latest version of ineptitude and poor play.

A nearly $100M payroll doesn't guarantee you anything, if you don't know how to properly allocate the resources to address the needs at hand.

Although there is alot of baseball left, I think 2006 may be a sell signal on the latest mgmt regime and that the fallout may claim a few jobs in the process.

I will say this - losing never gets any easier and as I grow older I am beginning to question why I have invested so many hours on my time on this planet following a franchise that has broke my heart more times than I can count.

Kudos to those of you who subscribe to Al's mantra to keep the faith.

As for me, I say the time is growing close to burn the damn thing to the ground, tear out the foundation and start again.

As Pete Townsend wrote "meet the new boss, same as the old boss."

by Jk1969 on May 9, 2006 9:48 AM CDT reply actions  

Re
But will we get fooled again?

by Jed Taylor on May 9, 2006 1:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

Agree...
As disappointed as I was after attending last night's road kill in San Diego, I agree that there still is enough time to get back in the playoff race.  But seriously, the players have to start performing consistently and smartly because we don't have much margin for error.  The big IF is the starting pitching getting healthy, performing dominantly because this offense is very bad, and staying healthy.  I think we can win a ton of games with this great bullpen if the starters get us to the 6th within a run or with a lead.

The microcosim of this losing streak, in last night's game in my opinion was Pierre's AB in the 7th.  Cubs have a rally going after Jones' lead off HR and Hefty Perez getting a one-out single, it's 7-2 Padres.  Pierre comes to bat and he has seen 17 pitches from Young in his previous 3 ABs and in his last AB he singled to CF.  I am thinking that Pierre is going to smoke this guy now.  Instead he swings at the first pitch for a lazy fly to CF.  I didn't understand it, he had seen everything Young had to offer, and the out did not upset me, it's that he swung at the first pitch and hit a soft fly.  In that situation when you have pitcher down and you go tough guy swinging you have to scorch the ball.  Cedeno followed his first disciplined AB of the game and a triple to left field, Cedeno can fly.  Then Embree comes in and gets Walker. It happenes and I still think Pierre is a good player but the Cubs don't seem to do anything right mentally lately and not much physically either.

But at least Pierre padded his SB stats witha  meaningless 1 out steal of 2B with the Cubs down 7-1.  Dusty's Tough Guys will go down fighting, uppercuts all the way...

Oh, and Young had very good stuff last night for the Padres.  He threw about 110 pitches in 6 and 2/3, but he threw very few pitches for balls and there were numerous ABs with guys fouling off 2-3 pitches.  Young was tough, so don't get too down with the loss.  Momentum is tomorrow's starting pitcher...

by DudeVf1 on May 9, 2006 9:49 AM CDT reply actions  

Cue Jim Mora...
"Playoffs?!?  Don't talk about playoffs.  Are you kidding me?  Playoffs?  I'm just hoping we can win a game, another game."
"A hot dog at the ball park is better than steak at the Ritz." -- Humphrey Bogart

by hokie316 on May 9, 2006 9:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

Mora...
Funny stuff, and appropriate right now.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGrewst9tnM&search=jim%20mora

One day, the dream will come true.

by brianp88 on May 9, 2006 10:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

A cause for optimism
would be the Cubs beating up on Jason Schmidt, that would show that there's some life in that team. Also, taking pitches wouldn't hurt.

by CubFaninNY on May 9, 2006 9:53 AM CDT reply actions  

I'm not down yet,
just disappointed in the quality of play we're getting.  If we were losing but had the appearance of smart play, hustle and deisre to win I could live with it.  I know the players are trying but there are too many things going wrong that can't be blamed on a poor offense.  Once everyone gets their heads in the game and play the game right I'll be happy, even if we don't win a lot of games.  At least we'll know they made an effort.  There's still time, let's hope the players and management figure some things out!

by pageian on May 9, 2006 10:01 AM CDT reply actions  

as in marathoning
99% of the people in front of you in mile 2 will be ahead of you in mile 26.

those too are words to live by.

by gaius marius on May 9, 2006 10:05 AM CDT reply actions  

When you were little,
you told the other kids there wasn't a Santa Claus, didn't you.
she

by Sarah Hope on May 9, 2006 10:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

WHAT?!?!?!?!?!?
Tell me you're kidding.
"A hot dog at the ball park is better than steak at the Ritz." -- Humphrey Bogart

by hokie316 on May 9, 2006 10:11 AM CDT up reply actions  

i was actually
the last kid to give it up. but you can't say i didn't learn something. :)

by gaius marius on May 9, 2006 10:12 AM CDT up reply actions  

Just joking :)
I was actually not taught to believe in Santa Claus.  Something about how my dad didn't want to lie to us and then come back later and tell us "just kidding about that whole Santa thing, gotcha".  Weird, but true.

I was also not allowed to go trick or treating or watch the Smurfs, Scooby Doo, or He Man.

she

by Sarah Hope on May 9, 2006 10:26 AM CDT up reply actions  

That is, actually, false...
... if you know anything about marathoning, you know that there are runners called "rabbits" who break out in front of the pack and set the early pace, but those runners rarely if ever win.

by Al Yellon on May 9, 2006 10:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

this is perfect
as one who has run a few, i can tell you that the number of rabbits in the field of the average marathon is a handful of the hundreds or thousands of runners.

again, you're citing the vanishingly rare special case and trying to apply it universally.

like it or not, al, it's very very true -- the folks in front at the start are almost always in front in the end; those in the middle stay in the middle; those in the back stay at the back.

i, for my part, was in the back. :)

by gaius marius on May 9, 2006 10:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

For the sake of argument
I'll conceed the clearly fabricated number 99%.  However, let's us remember that the reason we watch; the reason we do not abondon all hope and subscribe to absolute determinism is because of that 1%.  I'm proud to be a one-percenter, even if that means I wind up in the cellar with the kegs.
"There's no success like failure, and failure's no success at all." -B. Dylan

by Wood20K on May 9, 2006 4:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

does anyone have the phone number to Bud Light?
I need to recommend a new REAL MEN OF GENIUS....."Mr. Through Thick and Thin, Bleed Cubbie Blue 1 percenter"
Tony U La Grange, IL

by tony412 on May 9, 2006 4:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

Re
Well said.  And let's remember, as Cubs fans, winding up with the kegs is the perfect Rx for the pain they bring.

by Jed Taylor on May 9, 2006 11:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

'77 Cubs
That team was briliantly managed by Herman Franks. He was a very underrated tactiacal mgr. What killed the team (& morale) was Sutter getting hurt in late June.  They could not recover from it, & it was downhill from there.

by KedzieKid on May 9, 2006 10:06 AM CDT reply actions  

and as for giving up
there's a big difference between Giving Up -- that is, burning your jersey and cap and never watching another game again -- and recognizing that this year was lost in december and should not be clung to as it plummets like an anchor to the ocean bottom out of some strange devotion to an infantile conception of optimism. anchors don't float, no matter how "positively" you wish them to.

i have no plans to do the latter.

but the former is quickly becoming the only smart thing to do.

have optimism, folks, but redirect it to where it can do some good.

by gaius marius on May 9, 2006 10:11 AM CDT reply actions  

I'm optimistic
that you will get a day older today...

So who are you to tell me what I should and should  not be optimistic about?

Huh Gaius?

You say "I am not trying to tell people what kind of fans to be"

Then you say chide people for being optimistic about their team.  Its a life view. And this is coming from someone who is described by friends as cynical (especially about politics).  I choose to be optimistic about the Cubs because I care about the Cubs.

And who are you to call me names such as naive or infantile..

Go root for another team if you cannot make a positive contribution to it.  Go find another city to live in if you dislike what is happening in Chicago. I hear the Yankees are always looking for some more bandwagon hoppers.. and theres plenty of reason to be optimistic about the 203 million dollar team they've put together

by cubsfan2883 on May 9, 2006 10:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

be as silly as you want
i don't want to tell you what to do. but know that you're being silly, at least.

by gaius marius on May 9, 2006 10:32 AM CDT up reply actions  

How am I being silly?
by supporting my team rather than just saying.. oh tehy have no shot of making the playoffs?

I find your attitude to be equally as silly as being a polyanna.. Decrying defeat before battle is equally as "silly" as Claiming Victory before it.. I choose to believe that the Cubs can play better baseball with the players they have now.. I choose to believe that the Cubs will not lose 150 games in a row.. I choose to believe that the Cubs will tread water and finish a couple games above .500 for the year....

When you sit there .. and you say.. Oh the Cubs can never make the playoffs with this team?

and I ask you make me a reasonable move that the Cubs can make and you say: There is none.. You are making yourself just seem like a naysayer for the sake of naysaying..

by cubsfan2883 on May 9, 2006 10:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

i didn't say that
i said you're welcome to be as silly as you want, not that you're silly.

and what's contradictory about what i've said?

you say.. Oh the Cubs can never make the playoffs with this team?

and I ask you make me a reasonable move that the Cubs can make and you say: There is none.. You are making yourself just seem like a naysayer for the sake of naysaying..

they're cooked and there is no reasonable move to save them. it would take several, and that isn't going to happen.

that's not naysaying, friend. it's just how it is.

by gaius marius on May 9, 2006 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

Sorry, Gaius
But you did say that.

but know that you're being silly, at least.

she

by Sarah Hope on May 9, 2006 10:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

No, dear.
I said I was sorry, but you did say that.  I thought maybe you just forgot or something.  

Maybe you should just tell Cubsfan that you didn't mean it that way.

Can't talk now, I'm in the middle of telling you that you're silly. Ha!

:)

she

by Sarah Hope on May 9, 2006 10:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

By that same token..
..have some pessimism, but redirect it into some form of constructive criticism instead of just fiddling while Rome burns.  You see problems?  Then point them out and offer a solution.  But this whole "season is lost already so fuggit" attitude is tired.  
Chicks dig the long ball

by Will23 on May 9, 2006 10:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

that's my point
there's a destructiveness in clinging to the anchor all the way down. i don't think it's hugely important yet -- whether this team starts playing for 2007 now or on memorial day isn't a big deal.

but this club was putting kerry wood in the bullpen last august in an extremely lost cause in part out of this unconsidered, childlike manner of ignorant optimism.

if he had been on an operating table instead, where he certainly belonged, the cubs may not have had to throw rich hill and angel guzman all this time, and the team might be 3 out instead of 7.

do you see what i mean? last year's optimism contributed to this year's failings. that's what this team needs to avoid, among other things. knowing when to cut bait is one of the most important attributes of any successful investor.

by gaius marius on May 9, 2006 10:42 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ok
now you're just being silly.
she

by Sarah Hope on May 9, 2006 10:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

seriously
there's a nihilistic stupidity in useless hope, sarah.

you sometimes see it in gambers throwing good money after bad, or in people who bought some obscure tech share at $500 in 1999 who are still holding it at $10 thinking that it has to come back.

it doesn't have to come back. and hoping that it does while you sink larger sums into the game or hang on to those shares as the company goes bankrupt is as destructive a form of ignorance as there is.

by gaius marius on May 9, 2006 10:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ha!
there's a nihilistic stupidity in useless hope, sarah.

Actually, my name is Sarah Hope... Sorry, that just cracked me up.

Um, I was speaking of the statement in bold that said that last year's optimism contributed to this year's failings.

That's just silliness and you know it.

she

by Sarah Hope on May 9, 2006 10:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

not at all
and you might consider the deeper ramifications of the truth of that statement not just as it pertains to the cubs but in your life. there's a reason that some very hopeful people always seem to manage to lose money in what they do and always seem to get into abusive relationships.

much is made in our post-nietzschean world of the universal good of personal optimism, but what no one talks about is how optimism at the expense of pragmatism leads quickly to unmitigated disaster. the greeks were fond of writing plays about it -- you've heard i'm sure of the tragic chain koros-hybris-ate which plays out on every scale from the psychological to the civilizational.

by gaius marius on May 9, 2006 10:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

Hey, friend.
I wasn't looking for a debate.

Just saying you can be as silly as you want :)

she

by Sarah Hope on May 9, 2006 11:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

wow
But wouldn't you agree that it's one thing to have that sort of blind faith in your day to day life, and quite another to have it when you're talking about a baseball team?

I can have faith in the Cubs all I want, regardless of their chances of winning, but it's not going to leave me bruised or penniless. (Theoretically, at least....)

--Tim http://fridayafternoonintheuniverse.blogspot.com

by elscorcho0682 on May 9, 2006 12:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

Oh no worries.
Gaius likes to get a little dramatic from time to time.

That's why we love him.  We might not agree with his point, but man does he give it passionately.

she

by Sarah Hope on May 9, 2006 12:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

Haha, I know
Just trying to make a point. Seems the boards are completely covered with people today who want to convince us that we all have psychological debilitations because we haven't given up yet...
--Tim http://fridayafternoonintheuniverse.blogspot.com

by elscorcho0682 on May 9, 2006 12:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

I personally
like the way he can weave greek tragedies and nietzsche into the conversation

by flyball on May 9, 2006 1:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

Re
Especially since it's so apropos.

Remember - that which does not kill us makes us stronger.

by Jed Taylor on May 9, 2006 1:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

I always thought it was...
"If it doesn't kill you, it only postpones the inevitable."
"A hot dog at the ball park is better than steak at the Ritz." -- Humphrey Bogart

by hokie316 on May 9, 2006 1:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

I made that same comment in a post a few days ago
but I put it in latin to address it specifically to g. marius, based on the origin of the name.  Quod non mortiferum, fortiorem me facit (What does not kill me makes me stronger)
"There's no success like failure, and failure's no success at all." -B. Dylan

by Wood20K on May 9, 2006 4:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

You know...
... all this pop psychology doesn't change the fact that we are -- at least most of us are -- here because we are fans of a baseball team.

Part of that, I believe, is that you do still hope, and want them to win, and believe, until it is utterly hopeless to do so.

On May 9, the vast majority of us believe it is not hopeless.

If you feel it is, bully for you. But you don't have the right to criticize the rest of us for feeling the way we do.

by Al Yellon on May 9, 2006 12:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

Al,
you're like a little Blogging Buddha.
she

by Sarah Hope on May 9, 2006 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

From Ron To Al
"Ron Burgundy: [to Al] You're so wise. You're like a miniature Buddha, covered with hair. "

by cubsfan2883 on May 9, 2006 1:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

Presumably
the reverse is also true.
Players win awards but teams win championships.

by tharr on May 9, 2006 9:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

For the sake of debate
I will conceed that optimism at the expense of pragmatism is potentailly disasterous.  However, would you be willing to conceed that all optimism is not necessarily at the expense of pragmatism?  e.g., A particular individual's goal is to live as long as possible.  People who responded in a particular fashion to a series of questions are labeled by this one study are labeled "optimists".  These people are shown by the study to live longer.  If the individual subscribed to this attitude based on the reasearch, is he being optimistic or pragmatic or both?

As for the fallacy that the kuros-hubris-ate chain is an inevitable one, there is much out there besides Nietzche's laughable amateur classicism in "The Birth of Tragedy" that I'd be glad to discuss in private if you are interested.

"There's no success like failure, and failure's no success at all." -B. Dylan

by Wood20K on May 9, 2006 4:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ya know...
It don't cost nothing to hope.  So why not hope?  I don't cut my losses by by saying, "Meh.  It's done."  I'm not going to move on to something else besides wanting the Cubs to win.  It's free to hope!

I do dig what you're saying, though.  I think you are a real fan who wants the absolute best from the team he chooses to root for, and when it comes up short, then it hurts.  

But ya just never know.

And yeah, the Cubs are done.  Still I will watch and (HOPEfully) get proven wrong!  8-)

by Floyd on May 9, 2006 5:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

But our Tradable pieces ..
are playing so poorly that their value will be drastically reduced...

Juan Pierre- .286 OBP does have 18 Runs and the Cubs are 9-2 in games when Pierre scores 1 run.

Prospects. such as Rich Hill and Angel Guzman.. are available.. but they have been pounded.

Who else is available..

You would like to think that JJ is available for nothing but who is going to even give up something to take on that contract? Ick.

Umm.. Who else.. Ramirez maybe.. but you would have to get a hell of a deal to trade Aramis don't you think?

by cubsfan2883 on May 9, 2006 10:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

I must say
even as one of the ignorant optomists...

Gaius has a good point about Wood.  We could have had him a month and a half ago.

Go Cubbies!

by NC Cubs Fan on May 9, 2006 10:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

What then
is the CONSTRUCTIVENESS of your coming on this board nearly every day of 2006 and telling us the Cubs have no chance this year?

Have you accomplished anything in your campaign to convince all Cubs fans there is no hope?

"At the end of the day, don't tell me how rough the waters are... just get the ship into port." - Stoney

by BCurt10 on May 9, 2006 11:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

Former vs. Latter?
"i have no plans to do the latter.

but the former is quickly becoming the only smart thing to do. "

Burning your hat and jersey and never watching another game is the only smart thing to do?  Even if I did lose all hope, I'm not burning $200 of material.

Yes, I know what you meant.  I just feel obligated to tease the grand master on an ultra rare grammatical mistake.

"There's no success like failure, and failure's no success at all." -B. Dylan

by Wood20K on May 9, 2006 4:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

lol
thank you for highlighting my shortcomings. :)

by gaius marius on May 9, 2006 4:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not Bitching, just saying......
Jim Hendry, Dusty and the Cubs handcuffed themselves to Jacqui Jones (and his contract) in right field, and an overload of 2nd basemen that makes it almost impossible to give Theriot or Restovich extended playing time so early in the season. If in August, the Cubs are out of the hunt, I'm sure there will be plenty of time to "see what they can do". The only reason they were able to do so w/Ronny and Murton is because they had showed the ability to succeed either late last year as in the case w/Murton or in the fall league and spring training as in the case w/Ronny. Most of the blame I think should go to Hendry for not filling the holes like they should have in the offseason. There is no reason why we should be waiting around for Wood and Prior or even Miller. If you have an overload of pitchers at some point in the season, it's always easier to get rid of them than to try to accquire them.

About Dusty, maybe he should go. Didnt the Marlins fire their manager early in their latest championship season? And I believe the Astros did too in 2004 hiring Phil Garner after the All Star break. They ended up making the playoffs and winning their first playoff series in history and went to game 7 w/the Cards, falling one game short of the world series.

Ok, so I've decided to not let this all affect me so much. I will take the route of just continuing to be patient. Like when your pour beer into a glass...Hendry must have poured it pretty shaky cuz there's still foam up on top. But we all know eventually it will go away.

Hey did anyone notice John Koronka go to 4-1 last night? Maybe Hendry should have dealt Hill while he had some trade value and kept Koronka. I know, easy to say that in hindsight. Same w/Willis.

Ah, too much on my mind. Let me get some work done.

Tony U La Grange, IL

by tony412 on May 9, 2006 10:16 AM CDT reply actions  

I am
officially jumping on the Fire Dusty bandwagon

and a hello to the guy in LaGrange, just because you are from LaGrange

by flyball on May 9, 2006 10:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

Well.
If in August, the Cubs are out of the hunt

I think thats pretty safe to say. They are out of it NOW.

by Santos Sorrow @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on May 9, 2006 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

If the season ended today
You're right, they WOULD be out of the hunt.

But it hasn't, and they're not.

Why?? Why must you do this??

--Tim http://fridayafternoonintheuniverse.blogspot.com

by elscorcho0682 on May 9, 2006 1:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

Every game...
...is a new game.  So sayeth the buddah.

by Sidd Finch @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on May 9, 2006 10:18 AM CDT reply actions  

What we got for Koronka
from the MLB wire:

"Acquired INF Freddie Bynum from the A's in a three-team trade. Sent LHP John Koronka and a player to be named to Texas in the deal."

Koronka's stats in 2006:

W L ERA G GS    IP    H   R  ER  HR  BB so       4 1 3.65  7  7  44.1  41  18  18  4   12 25

better than Hill and Guzman, no?

by CubFaninNY on May 9, 2006 10:43 AM CDT reply actions  

So far, yes.
Do you really think Koronka is going to wind up as one of the best pitchers in the AL?

I don't.

Granted, what the Cubs received in this deal is worthless. But I don't think, in the end, they gave up anything valuable, either.

by Al Yellon on May 9, 2006 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

Best Pitcher? no.
decent? yes. Guzman has shown no such signs, and they'll probably give up on him soon as well.

by CubFaninNY on May 9, 2006 10:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

Boy, I don't know Al
I know I'm second guessing here but looking back, it sure looks like trading Weurtz and keeping Koronka would have been the right move. Left handed starters are always in high demand...

I sure hope he doesn't turn out to be another Jamie Moyer.

One day, the dream will come true.

by brianp88 on May 9, 2006 10:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

Each trade has risks...
Trading uberprospect Choi for DLee WORKED.  Maybe trading Koronka for Bynum won't.  Nonetheless, it's not a seasonchanger.  Koronka wouldn't have helped us hit right now.

by ontheuptick on May 9, 2006 10:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

It seems to me..
...that the Cubs gave Koronko ample opportunities the last two springs to make his case for being on the 25 man roster and he wasn't up to the task.

Sometimes a change of scenery and new pitching coach can turn a player around.  Only time will tell.

But, I really don't see how the Cubs can be accused of not giving Koronka a fair shot.  In fact, I seem to recall some griping that Koronko was being given opportunities that others felt should have gone to Hill or Guzman.

by jazzman56 on May 9, 2006 11:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

Re
Actually, Koronka had a pretty good spring, pitching 12 innings with a 3.75 ERA and 10 hits and 2 BBs.

It was much better than the players they kept in Hill, Williams, and Guzman.  Of course, maybe that's why Texas took Koronka.  Each has continued on from his respective spring performance.

by Jed Taylor on May 9, 2006 1:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

You...
..conviently ignored the fact that I said the last TWO springs.  He had an ERA of 7 in 2005 ST and also an ERA of 7.5 in 4 appearances with the Cubs during the 2005 regular season.

It is also worth noting that 2005 was the 7th year that Koronka spent toiling in the minors and that no doubt factored into the Cubs decision to give him a fresh start elsewhere.

by jazzman56 on May 9, 2006 2:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

And...
... that wasn't a bad idea. I only wish they had got someone less useless than Freddie Bynum.

The acquisition (and playing) of Bynum not only had a negative effect because of what he did on the field, but it also kept an actual useful player, Ryan Theriot, in the minor leagues.

by Al Yellon on May 9, 2006 2:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

The thing is...
...I don't remember anyone being terribly upset when Koronko was traded.  Why is it so hard to give other teams credit once in awhile?  It seems to me he got a good look in the Cubs organization and if the Rangers saw soemthing there that the Cubs missed, well, good for them.

I'm not quite ready to crown him Rookie of The Year, however.

These kind of low level deals have low risk/low reward potential, and if once in awhile you get hoodwinked...well, it happens to all teams.

The fellow that posts the reports on ex-Cubs does a good job.  Use that as a guide to keep some perspective on over-all performance.  It is more useful than focusing on the inevitable occaisional missteps.

by jazzman56 on May 9, 2006 2:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

lee << bynum
It's not so much the fact that they traded a prospect -- who may actually work out for the Rangers -- that's the problem to me.  Instead, it's what they got back...namely, a guy in Freddie Bynum who's been around long enough to prove that he has no value to the team afield or with the stick, and who plays a 'superutility' role that's already been filled by JHJ.

Trade Koronka for a guy who can mash from the right side and play a corner, that I can see.

by dustyisdonnie on May 9, 2006 12:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

Jerome Williams
pitched last night for the Iowa Cubs, who lost to Memphis 7-4.  Williams pitched six innings and gave up five runs on nine hits.  He struck out 1, walked 2 and allowed three homeruns against.  Two of the homeruns were hit by ex major leaguer Timo Perez, the other by ex Cardinal Skip Schumaker.

The one positive stat you could take from this outing is that Williams threw 106 pitches and 70 were strikes.  

I'm wondering if we're going to see Jerome again before September...

One day, the dream will come true.

by brianp88 on May 9, 2006 11:09 AM CDT reply actions  

Observations from San Diego
I was at the last two games and here are some observations:

The Cubs finally hit the ball hard last night, but right at somebody.  Bellhorn and Greene made some great crucial plays.  Ramirez hit the ball hard each time up, but loafed to first base on his last ab double play, when he was robbed of a hit by Greene.

Hairston swings like he's Sammy Sosa.  He covers a lot of ground at second base but until he becomes a contact hitter, he's a detriment.

Pierre's last season wasn't an abberation, but the start of a slippery slide to oblivion.

Maddux didn't have anything last night.

by Clark Addison on May 9, 2006 11:20 AM CDT reply actions  

Aramis loafing
I hate when he does that, AND HE ALWAYS DOES! doesn't he know there's a bigscreen for that? he can watch the replays later, now bust outta the box ARam!

by CubFaninNY on May 9, 2006 2:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

Oh how you soothe...
Al... If I were ever captured by the Mexican Mafia, covered in honey and buried in a next of fire ants, I'd want you there to soothe me as I was slowly eaten alive... perhaps telling me that the ants will eventually get full and move on, or that the honey will make them lethargic, and in time allow me to dig my way out of the hole.

GO CUBS!

Languishing in Card Country.

by evillecubman on May 9, 2006 12:16 PM CDT reply actions  

I ment nest...
not next!  Oops.
Languishing in Card Country.

by evillecubman on May 9, 2006 12:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

My thought
Are we still having fun following the Cubs? Of course, it is not as much fun as when they're winning, but it is still fun overall?

For me, the answer is yes, but it's not nearly as much fun as in the old days when they were losing. Someone just going to the park and hoping that they win that day was enough, the standings mattered less.  

I guess it is higher expectations, but somehow it is also that many of the players seem less engaging somehow.  I am certain that I used to think of the players more in the sense of what they could do, not their limitations.  

Anything is possible, which is what makes a season fun, but I do think I need to be able to enjoy the Cubs for what they are and stop worrying about what they're not.  Otherwise it will stop being enjoyable, and then what's the point of spending my time following them?

by Routine Pop Fly on May 9, 2006 1:05 PM CDT reply actions  

I was talking to a friend last night
and she clearly remembers her dad prior to 1986 being a very happy being a Red Sox fan even when they were losing, but after '86 bad words were much more often employed when talking about the team, she thinks that year caused (or at least cemented) the Red Sox Nation bitterness that is still around today (anyone who thought that there was a 5 year grace period was completely wrong its still the same fan base)

and I had to agree somewhat in regards to the Cubs, but I honestly don't know if its because as a kid I didn't really get standings and everything (after all what did the post season matter if they were never in it) and just had fun watching the games and now I'm an adult and understand all those things, so the disappointment is there.

by flyball on May 9, 2006 1:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

OK, let's carry the analogy...
...a bit further.  On May 19th in 1967, the Red Sox "Miracle Season', they were 14-17 and 7 games out in the American League.

In fact, a month later, June 18th, they were still at .500 and 6.5 games behind the White Sox.

We all know what eventually happened.

by jazzman56 on May 9, 2006 1:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

That '67 Red Sox Team
lost the World Series because they couldn't set up it's preferred pitching rotation for the World Series --they clinched on the last day of the season and were forced to use their best pitcher, Jim Lonborg to do it.  

While St. Louis was able to pitch Bob Gibson in games one, four and seven of the World Series, Lonborg who was 22-9 that year, wasn't able to pitch until game two of the World Series.  Boston had to pitch him on short rest in game 7, and that was probably the difference, IMO.

One day, the dream will come true.

by brianp88 on May 9, 2006 2:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yep...
...that's because they had to go down to the last day to decide the AL pennant.

But, that is a nice problem to have.  What Cubs fan wouldn't like to being kvetching over what the pitching matchups will be this October?

by jazzman56 on May 9, 2006 4:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

In the words of the immortal
Charlie Brown, "Oh Brother"

by Santos Sorrow @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on May 9, 2006 1:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

it's still very enjoyable
but i think our ideas of enjoyment are radically different.

would someone who hated what he was doing put the work in to find this or this? i think not.

there's a really frightening undercurrent here -- and not just here, but because al is a proponent of it there does seem to be a higher concentration here -- that feels that reality is a downer, and escaping it = enjoyment.

i think we all enjoy a ballgame -- i often watch little league on weekends. and i do think that too much attention is paid to sport and entertainment generally in our society.

but a lot of folks here detest the reality of the cubs abysmal situation because it impinges upon their fantasy -- or, worse, indicts their selfish fantasies in contributing to the cubs' real struggles. pining for a return to a pleasantly mythologized version of the bad old days is simply a variation on that theme.

that's a sort of antisocial behavior to be inveighed against at every opportunity, imo.

by gaius marius on May 9, 2006 1:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

That's ridiculous...
... the amount of work you have put in to "prove" your point, actually is a "frightening undercurrent" of its own.

You're working SO hard at sucking any enjoyment that any of us have from baseball -- and calling it "antisocial behavior" is a slam that should not be tolerated.

How dare you lecture to us on what we should and shouldn't do. Who are YOU to tell us how we should and shouldn't enjoy baseball?

Go lock yourself up with your spreadsheets, and your smug, haughty attitude. You seem happier there.

by Al Yellon on May 9, 2006 1:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Hooray
For Al has slain the mighty beast and the children are once again free to roam the streets without fear.

by akcubfan on May 9, 2006 2:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

lol
your defensiveness betrays how close to your comfort zone those assertions are, i think.

but it's up to you. i can only point it out.

by gaius marius on May 9, 2006 2:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think not.
I think he's just annoyed.
she

by Sarah Hope on May 9, 2006 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think
we're all wondering why you even bother to cheer for the Cubs, and why you find that it's your place to tell us why we shouldn't cheer for them.

I've got White Sox caps for anyone who wants them.

--Tim http://fridayafternoonintheuniverse.blogspot.com

by elscorcho0682 on May 9, 2006 2:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

not telling you not to be a fan
just saying -- there are more interesting. productive and rewarding ways of being a fan than being a mere cheerleader.

by gaius marius on May 9, 2006 2:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

The whole point is...
... as you said, it's up to me.

It's not up to YOU to tell me how to be a fan.

by Al Yellon on May 9, 2006 2:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

No one here
is being a mere cheerleader!! We're acknowledging problems. We're suggesting solutions. But we are NOT posting over and over again that this season is done for.

I really enjoy reading a lot of your analysis and commentary, man, but I think you're just reading what you want to read in this one.

--Tim http://fridayafternoonintheuniverse.blogspot.com

by elscorcho0682 on May 9, 2006 2:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

do you think
that i want this season to be a lost cause?

i only know what the evidence tells me. and that is:

-- teams that go five back of the leaders in the 27th game are finished, historically speaking;

-- teams that lose seven straight at any point in the year are also are basically cooked.

this team is both.

it's time to play for 2007. start theriot everyday. keep playing cedeno. keep hill, guzman and marshall in the rotation regardless of who comes back off the dl. release rusch and recall aardsma. forget about buying at the 7/31 deadline and start setting up some trades to bring in a new crop of prospects from contenders -- particularly pierre, maddux and williamson.

let's find out what these kids can do. some of them are going to be awful, and it's just ridiculous that a major-market financial powerhouse is reduced to this minnesotaesque penny-ante one-horse situation. but this could be a golden opportunity.

by gaius marius on May 9, 2006 2:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

Some of these suggestions...
... are useful ones, particularly being sellers near the trading deadline IF the club is still floundering at that time.

Your statistical comparisons are just that -- numbers on a spreadsheet. If you want to use them to crush your own hope, be my guest.

It is May 9. It is NOT time to play for 2007. Not yet.

If the club is floundering like this on July 9 -- which, coincidentally, is the last date before the All-Star break -- then, absolutely, I'm with you.

Till then, I ask you only to let a bit more of the season unfold before you categorically give up.

by Al Yellon on May 9, 2006 2:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

There are three kinds of lies
Lies, damn lies, and statistics.

Please. Any baseball fan knows that anything can happen at any time, until mathematical elimination is a reality. Keep with us for just a little while longer.

--Tim http://fridayafternoonintheuniverse.blogspot.com

by elscorcho0682 on May 9, 2006 3:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

PS
I'm not categorically disagreeing with your suggestions. The young guys might be the ticket, and I'd like to see them out there. Nothing wrong with talking about trades and such. That's realism.

But "We're done for this year" is something I'm not willing to accept in early May.

--Tim http://fridayafternoonintheuniverse.blogspot.com

by elscorcho0682 on May 9, 2006 3:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think
again, that it's fine to be realistic. And I see all of the problems that the Cubs have, as I'm sure we all do. I accept that there are a lot of bad decisions being made, a lot of bad baseball being played. I'm not happy with that.

But I'm not going to stop being a Cubs fan because I don't agree with what they're doing at the moment. Take it as you will.

Again, your psychology makes sense but I think you're taking it too far. It's a game. Fantasy as such is one thing when you're talking about politics, finances, etc. It's just baseball.

--Tim http://fridayafternoonintheuniverse.blogspot.com

by elscorcho0682 on May 9, 2006 1:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Speaking of Fantasy
My "Fantasy" 30 team Real GM league is going quite well.. I took over the fledgling Pirates and somehow have ended up with
David Wright, Chase Utley, Jason Bay, Coco Crisp, Josh Willingham, Bobby Abreu, Rich Harden, Zach Duke, Cliff Lee, Chris Ray Jimmy Rollins, Matt Cain.. amongst others..

I also have Delmon Young, Mike Pelfrey, and some other talented specs in my minors still.  I've found that people love guys who have small amounts of success in the ML's and will trade for them no matter how much.  

Anyhow I am in 1st place in the National League...

by cubsfan2883 on May 9, 2006 2:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

Good for you
I'm getting my butt kicked in my league...injuries, injuries...arg!!!
--Tim http://fridayafternoonintheuniverse.blogspot.com

by elscorcho0682 on May 9, 2006 2:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

Batlling through injuries...
Has been rough for me.. I've had to start Willie Bloomquist in CF while Coco Crisp has been on the mend.., Also I've gone one SP short since Rich Harden has been hurt. Which really has been taxing... I only have Cain (SF) Duke (PIT) and C.Lee(CLE) now as my starters so I am jockeying for another starter.. trying to offer up Phil Nevin as tradebait.

by cubsfan2883 on May 9, 2006 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

I've lost
Bartolo Colon, Mark Prior, Gary Sheffield, Chipper Jones, etc, etc, etc.
--Tim http://fridayafternoonintheuniverse.blogspot.com

by elscorcho0682 on May 9, 2006 2:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

i wouldn't ask anyone to stop being a fan
any more than i'm going to stop.

but i would take pains to point out that optimism needn't be confined to this year -- especially once this year shows itself to be a lost cause, as it has. one can take the longer view and work toward more distant goals that actually have a chance of being realized.

by gaius marius on May 9, 2006 2:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

We disagree only, then...
... on where this year is going.

It is May 9. There are 131 games remaining. That's 80% of the season. Many things can happen, and HAVE HAPPENED TO OTHER TEAMS in similiar situations.

Is it likely? No.

Is it POSSIBLE? Yes. And that's what makes it worth being a fan. Hope. For NOW, not just for some indeterminate future date.

by Al Yellon on May 9, 2006 2:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

Baseball
is a game that is to be enjoyed.  Fresh air.  A cold beer or Coke.  Peanuts.  Crackerjack. Hotdogs.  Good times with friends and families.  Friendly rivalries with fans of other teams. You become a fan of a team and hope to see it win.  Your team may fall behind in a game or in the standings.  But they are your team.  IMO, this website is a forum for those who root for the same team to share their joys and frustrations for the season.  Unfortunately, we are subjected to reading a bunch of psychological babble like:

"but a lot of folks here detest the reality of the cubs abysmal situation because it impinges upon their fantasy -- or, worse, indicts their selfish fantasies in contributing to the cubs' real struggles. pining for a return to a pleasantly mythologized version of the bad old days is simply a variation on that theme. that's a sort of antisocial behavior to be inveighed against at every opportunity, imo."

Give it a rest, Gaius.  I'm trying to enjoy the Cubs for what they are -- a baseball team.  Please stop trying to belittle me for following and rooting for my team.  

One day, the dream will come true.

by brianp88 on May 9, 2006 2:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

I love
how the deeply philosophical commentary is ended with "imo". Comedy at its best.
--Tim http://fridayafternoonintheuniverse.blogspot.com

by elscorcho0682 on May 9, 2006 2:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

I remember 77 and 78
I think Cubs pulled a similar fast start in 78 and def. 73 they had huge lead and  faded badly...but recent teams haven't had these incredible 3-week or longer stretches...only ones have been bad ruts like current dropping 8 games from 5 over to 3 under .500...why does it seem so much easier to go backward?

Doing what Hou did from 15 under into playoffs last year is an aberration can't see this year's cub team being much better than .500 but hold out hope for one of those  hot streaks...

I posted a few weeks back during giddy early days about losing streaks being downfall...just didn't think it would happen so soon, so depressingly...hard to get pumped for rest of season, but things can turn around.

Santo and Hughes were down on lack of walks-getting on base by leadoff hitter, something Ditka of all people mentioned this AM on ESPN Radio here locally...Pierre should be sparking offense, but has been a big dud on this trip and for most games.

Glad Cubs didn't lock into him long term like we did with JJ!!

by writerinwrigley on May 9, 2006 2:04 PM CDT reply actions  

Speaking of 1973...
... on August 30, 1973, the New York Mets were 61-71, in LAST place, behind FIVE other teams, 6.5 games out.

They went 21-8 and won the NL East.

Yes, that was an aberration of a divisional year. But it does show that a team can come back from this far back -- even if there are only 1/5 as many games remaining as there are now.

The '73 Mets, as did their [shudder] 1969 counterparts, won with pitching.

This Cub team can do the same IF Wood, Prior and Miller come back. Will they? Maybe not.

But it is too early to say they won't.

by Al Yellon on May 9, 2006 2:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

hmmmm
Hey Al,
the problem is that this team can't hit, field, or run the bases well.
or if they do one thing, they can't do the other.
Or if they do ALL of them, they're hitting the balls right at somebody.
I'm striking this one up as another 'god hates us' year.
john
p.s. is there any truth to the fact that Wrigley was built on a graveyard?

by jdoolsiu on May 9, 2006 2:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not a graveyard
but a Seminary, I believe.  Al?
One day, the dream will come true.

by brianp88 on May 9, 2006 2:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

But..
...if you talked to a Mets fan in the summer of 1973, he would have had a similar laundry list of complaints about his favorite team.

When you are losing, you tend to not hit, field or run the bases well.  If the Cubs were not a ballclub that is primarily made up of veterans with significant track records, I'd say this may be a long season.

Sometimes, a group of quality veteran players all have a bad year all at the same time.  But, not very often.

It is just too early to say if that is the case this year or not.  You have Barrett, Walker, Ramirez, Pierre, Jones, Maddux, and others who have been through many pennant races and have enjoyed some significant success.  Why write them off as a group in early May?  There's no logic behind that.

by jazzman56 on May 9, 2006 2:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not exactly
Wrigley was built on the site of a former seminary, the seminary which I would assume the street that is near the park is named after.

by gauchodirk on May 9, 2006 2:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

H. Res 627
this has nothing to do with the cubs, but the House just adopted a resolution to congratulate chris carpenter for wimming the cy young last year.  I think im gonna be sick

by Strickland843 on May 9, 2006 2:29 PM CDT reply actions  

I'm not
against it, per se, since he's a Card, but I AM against it because I think the House has better things to do with their time...for all of the 90 days they work out of the year...

</politics>

--Tim http://fridayafternoonintheuniverse.blogspot.com

by elscorcho0682 on May 9, 2006 2:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'd rather have them...
...spend their time on stuff like this than tackle real issues, given their track record.

I wish they would take off 365 days a year.

by jazzman56 on May 9, 2006 2:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

Re
Did it cost us anything?  Let's count our blessings, then, that the House has passed legislation that hasn't managed to drive us further into debt.

by Jed Taylor on May 9, 2006 3:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm so glad
that with all their spare time now that they've  fixed Social Security, come to a consensus on immigration, and made sure everyone in the country has healthcare coverage that they have found something productive to do

which Rep wanted a photo-op on the campaign trail?

by flyball on May 9, 2006 2:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

apparently
it made me forget how to spell

by Strickland843 on May 9, 2006 2:30 PM CDT reply actions  

This team
I've read through many of these posts...about having hope and not giving up, about enjoying the games, about pessimism, optimism, comments directed towards people on this message board. People are free to post as they like. Cub fans are free to have undying optimism just as they are warrented in giving up and wanting to set fire to the team. I will not bash either side of the spectrum because I believe that each side should be allowed to enjoy the game as they see fit.

Now I am going to voice my opinion on this team, mainly because I've read people accuse others here of sucking the enjoyment out of baseball. To me, the Cubs, over the last three years have sucked any enjoyment out of baseball on the north side for me. I have been a Cub fan my entire life, plan on remaining a Cub fan, however the team of the last three years, to me, has become so unbearable to watch and deal with. In my mind, the aura surrounding this team, its attitude and the tone that it gives off, to me, is attrocious. They do not play the game well. They do not play the game with heart. They often do not play the game due to injuries. When the crap hits the fan, this team folds. Other teams rebound, people step up and leadership demands excellence. Cubs management sits there with their hands in the air, does not exude confidence, and does not know how to identify problems. Management is seemingly so stupid that they cannot identify and employ basic statistics. Management distains the media and the fans.

If you want to blame me for sucking the life out of anyone, thats fine. But this is how this Cubs team is to me. As someone who bleeds Cubbie blue, Cub baseball has become so unenjoyable for me to watch and all I want to do is disect the problem and give suggestions on how to make it better, unfortunately I no longer have confidence that Cubs management knows how to make it better. I will not apologize for feeling this way and voicing this. If this blog is only for the positive side of things, I will willingly take my tent and set it up elsewhere.

DmL

by dmlichte on May 9, 2006 3:09 PM CDT reply actions  

No one has ever said...
... this blog is only for the "positive side of things".

But you hit the nail on the head when you said:

I will not bash either side of the spectrum because I believe that each side should be allowed to enjoy the game as they see fit.

Constructive criticism and discussion is not only welcome, WE DO IT ALL THE TIME HERE.

But telling us we're not good fans because we haven't given up -- as some here have done -- that's what I can't stomach.

Now, let me agree with some of your contentions. This team has, at times this year, played the game atrociously. At other times, they have played well. I disagree that they have no heart -- that's easy to say when you see a team lose seven straight.

And to criticize injuries? How can you do that? Injuries are part of the game.

You say "other teams rebound". How do you know the Cubs won't do this?

by Al Yellon on May 9, 2006 3:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

Criticizing injuries
I wasn't criticizing them, I was simply stating that we've seem a lot of players lose a lot of time to them, on a regular basis. But if you want me to validate criticizing the injuries that we've seen, I will:
  • Cubs management should be ashamed of constantly putting stock in the same players who have suffered regular injuries. The fact that they went into this season with their success resting on Wood and Prior was just stupid. Wood was coming off injury and can't stay healthy. Prior seemingly always comes out of spring training delayed. They put all their eggs in the Prior/Wood basket in 2004 and again in 2005. You'd think Hendry would have learned.
  • Prior, well there has been significant talk that he refuses to pitch through any pain. Its always something with him. What has been mentioned is that his father manages his career and does not want him to risk any injury so any ache or pain leads to significant loss of playing time so that Prior will one day land his long term big money contract.
  • Wood has refused to change his mechanics and this has resulted in injuries for him. Now if you listen to media reports, it seems that he has finally changed his mechanics a bit and looks great. However he has lost a few years of production due to his unwillingness to alter his mechanics.
  • Aramis is always one play away from a groin pull or a muscle strain. Cubs conditioning has not been good in recent years and they finally got someone to come to spring training this year to work on conditioning.
As to the "other teams rebound..." I don't believe that the Cubs will because they've never shown the resiliance that other teams do. The Astros, Braves and A's, for example, they rebound and are known as bounce back teams. They have shown that they have what it takes to come back. The Cubs, on the other hand, have not shown that ability. Since the 2003 playoffs, they have shown that in the shadow of adversity, they fold. I am not saying that the Cubs cannot come back, however they have not shown the ability to do so. What I was speaking more to, about bouncing back, however, was the Sox and Tigers. The Sox lost Jermaine Dye, the MVP of the World Series, and they stare the loss in the face and keep on winning. The Tigers play a horrid game, showing no drive, and their manager takes them to task (and as a result, they stick nearly even with a good Sox team). The Cubs face adversity and they lose seven in a row in a stretch of ten games where they do not score more than three runs a game.

DmL

by dmlichte on May 9, 2006 3:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree
with just about everything you wrote.  The only thing I would question is your point about conditioning -- I think that's just a convenient excuse when a team gets more than it's fair share of injuries -- blame it on the trainer or the training regimen.  For example, Jermaine Dye has had his share of injury problems, yet not even the great Herm Schneider can do anything about it...
One day, the dream will come true.

by brianp88 on May 9, 2006 3:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

You're certainly
entitled to your opinion.  All I'm concerned with is not being belittled for having a differing opinion than somebody else's.  I don't want to be told I have "selfish fantasies" for not giving up on the season on May 9th.  I don't like it when someone infers that my opinion is inferior to their own.
 
One day, the dream will come true.

by brianp88 on May 9, 2006 3:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

not inferior
just not pragmatic, brian. big, big difference.

by gaius marius on May 9, 2006 4:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

Pragmatism..
... is a matter of opinion.

All we've been saying is that you don't have the right to determine whether someone's opinion is right or not.

by Al Yellon on May 9, 2006 4:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

if you knew
how funny it is to hear a person of your views say that, al, you wouldn't.

"reality is a matter of opinion" is what you mean -- and you know, for you, i wonder if in fact it isn't. you're one of the hardest of hardcore relativists. i've rarely interacted with someone so willing to dismiss the facts out of hand to preserve a fantasy intact and unchallenged.

by gaius marius on May 9, 2006 7:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

I know exactly what the facts are...
... but as many other posters have said, why should I let YOU decide how I am to enjoy baseball?

Or keep hoping?

Do as you wish, but do not force your views on others.

by Al Yellon on May 9, 2006 7:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

don't worry
i'm incapable of forcing anyone to do anything.

asking you to consider a bit more carefully what you're thinking, why you're thinking it and what the destructive ramifications are of those thoughts, however, is something i can and will always do.

by gaius marius on May 9, 2006 7:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

Believe it or not...
... I do listen to what you say, because you are quite articulate, and clearly knowledgeable in many fields about which I know little.

I differ with you on whether my opinions are "destructive", however.

I'm going to keep hoping until it is clearly beyond hope. I think you do the same, actually. Where we disagree is on where the point of hopelessness is located.

by Al Yellon on May 9, 2006 7:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

Pragmatism
is A way of approaching situations or solving problems that emphasizes practical applications and consequences.  While the reliability of the approach or problem solving attempt may be held to empirically verifiable standards, what specifically the goal towards which the pragmatism is striving is subjective, and unknowable unless made explicit.  Even a legitimate and explicit goal may be made subjective when the means of verifying the pragmatic viability are absent or incomplete.  Anything at that point is conjectural, thereby losing its pragmatic ontology by definition.  After all, how practical is it to pretend to be able to harness the unknowable?  So, insofar as pragmatism is applied to something whose inherent structure is subjective, such as how to view a losing streak by your favorite baseball team: Pragmatism is in fact subjective.  Q.E.D.
"There's no success like failure, and failure's no success at all." -B. Dylan

by Wood20K on May 9, 2006 7:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

let's not confuse, however
means and ends.

ends differ around here -- al professes to want escape, for example, and i want the team to win -- but i could agree that they are all fundamentally subjective, as least vis-a-vis a baseball team.

means, however, as you note, can be verified by experience as successful and productive -- and this is where al and i diverge most. al has not grasped nor does he make an effort to grasp at these verifiable rules of pragmatic assessment known collectively as "probability" -- which is not, fwiw, an attempt to render the unknowable deterministically knowable but to characterize the distribution of intrinsically unknowable phenomena; he instead prefers to substitute a notional ideology which is truly subjective, which he and others miscast as "optimism".

it is this refutation of the means of phenomenal assessment in experience that exposes his view for what it is -- not an attempt to apprehend reality but to escape it.

and worse, he does not seem to recognize it, instead wrongly insisting that he is engaging phenomena on their terms and not his own -- probably reflexively, as there is hardly anyone in educated civility that does not fancy themselves a "scientist" even though there seem to me to be remarkably few.

i find these trends in common thought and discourse to be both widespread and alarming. such refutation of the tactile and the experiential is what got the bush adminsitration sunk into a disaster in iraq, for example, with the assistance of many millions of similarly deluded americans -- this manner of ideological thought has real and severely debilitating consequences under many earthly conditions.

so i make a habit of pointing them out where i find them and trying to raise awareness about the damage it can cause. it's just a baseball team, some would say -- but i disagree. theater (which is all sport is) has long been the public forum for teaching complex and nuanced thought to ostensibly simple people. to concede the point on the grandest stage in decadent western civilization is tantamount to abdicating it everywhere. i, for one, will not.

great comment, w20k. :)

by gaius marius on May 9, 2006 8:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

I hope you can see...
...the difference between what you have posted here and what others have.

It's one thing to express your opinion of the current state of the Cubs franchise and your feelings about the team in general.  It is quite another to call someone ignorant or imply that they just aren't bright enough to realize that the season is hopeless and that the rest of the summer is just playing out the string.

It's not even that I have a problem with that opinion.  It's that it is just that; an opinion, not a demonstrable fact.  On the contrary, it goes against all logic.

But, anyone who wants to "wave the white flag" on May 9th is more than welcome to do so.  

Just don't try to convince me to join you or tell me that I'm somehow intellectually defective if choose not to do so.

by jazzman56 on May 9, 2006 4:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

however...
... if you are not willing to either try to see both sides of the argument or at least counter the opinions with points of your own, there is little room for discourse.

I'm not sure if you're saying that my opinion goes against all logic or all opinions do. If you feel that mine do, I'd prefer that you demonstrate why or just not respond.

DmL

by dmlichte on May 9, 2006 4:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm sorry...
...I guess I wan't terribly clear.  I was merely trying to say that I don't have any problem at all with what you said in your post titled "This team".

The only thing I was trying to do is point out the difference between your post and many of the ones posted by gaius marius.

I carefully read your post, and I think you did a good job of articulating and explaining your feelings about the 2006 Cubs team.  I'm in no way trying to dimish your feelings or try to convince you to feel otherwise.

In fact, since you "bleed cubbie blue" and I do not, there is ample reason for your feelings to run deeper than mine.

However, notably missing from your post is any attempt to belittle or denigrate anyone else's feelings, and to me, that is the difference.  I am tired of being told that I somehow lack intelligence when I point out that waving the white flag on May 9th is not a logical reaction to what has transpired so far.

If, as you say, you cannot enjoy watching the 2006 Cubs, then I respect that.

But, if it is okay with you and everyone else, I will continue to watch with great curiosity to see how things transpire over the coming months.  

And I hope we can continue to compare notes as the season unfolds, because that is what makes BCB fun for me.

by jazzman56 on May 10, 2006 8:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

if you have opinions
and cannot defend them, you should change them -- not sit around and sulk about how you feel emotionally slighted, jazzman.

that's the entire point of this kind of discourse. if we aren't here to learn something about our own views, what are we here for? to soliliquize in a vacuum? a cubbie blue circle jerk?

i'll say again: i have no grounds to criticize anyone personally here; i don't know any of you; i don't know anything about your feelings.

your expressed views and ideas, however, will be made to bear the weight of criticism in a forum like this. (mine certainly have.) so if you choose to believe that this team can win in spite of the evidence that shows that they have a snowball's chance in hell, you'd best be prepared to defend it with something more than, "i wanna think what i wanna think!"

by gaius marius on May 10, 2006 9:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Better with Alliteration...
Bounce Baker and Bring Bob Brenly out of the Broadcast Booth, Brother.

by BadGuy on May 9, 2006 3:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

smells like
a new sign to bring to Wrigley.
--Tim http://fridayafternoonintheuniverse.blogspot.com

by elscorcho0682 on May 9, 2006 3:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

done
Next game I'm going to will be in St. Louis on 6/4 so I'll bring it then.

by BadGuy on May 9, 2006 4:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

Just gotta change some punctuation here..
..Bounce Baker and Bring Bob Brenly out of the Broadcast Booth? Oh, brother.
Chicks dig the long ball

by Will23 on May 9, 2006 4:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

No longer a sign
But a big blue banner.

Oh, hell..Now I'M doing the B alliteration...

--Tim http://fridayafternoonintheuniverse.blogspot.com

by elscorcho0682 on May 9, 2006 4:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

Brenly
I'm not a fan of his at all.  I think so little of him and Kaspar that I watch games on WGN with the sound off.  In a perfect world, I'd find a way to steal Giradi away from Florida.  Seeing he's a Chicago native and lifelong fan, I don't think it'd be too hard to convince him; management would be the real hurdle.
"There's no success like failure, and failure's no success at all." -B. Dylan

by Wood20K on May 9, 2006 4:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

So you're saying...
... that being a native and lifelong fan is the main qualification for Girardi getting the job?

Frankly, I'd like someone with a bit more experience, and a plan. I don't see Girardi as that, not yet, anyway.

FWIW, he's not a Chicago native. He's from Peoria.

by Al Yellon on May 9, 2006 5:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

Like Dusty Baker...
Well he has the experience anyway..

DB:"Hey Larry, What do we do now?"
LR: "The same thing we do every night, Pinky, come up with a plan to take over the world."
DB: "Say Larry you're sounding kinda scary with the take over the world non-sense I am just trying to win a baseball game."
LR: " You fool, maybe if you would stop treating the lineup like your own personal dartboard and stop insisting that Freddy Bynum is our savior.. we wouldn't be in this mess.
DB: "I miss my Macias..."

by cubsfan2883 on May 9, 2006 5:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not at all
It's tangential to my main argument, which in my fervor I failed to make.

While he was with the Cubs, he was a clubhouse leader.  Not only was he very passionate about his job and this team (which every player should have, but seems to be the exception rather than the rule, lately), I think he handled the pitchers very well.  I never had the chance to sit in the dugout and hear what he had to say gametime, but I've seen and read interviews which dispelled for me the notion that the catcher's gear is in fact the "tools of ignorance".  I think he's got a great grasp of the game, and from what I remember, when he came out to the mound, he got the pitcher back into in the right place 9 times out of 10.

I like having a manager who was either a pitcher or a catcher, because based on my experience, they have the best grasp on the minutia of the game.  Catchers usually have the best experience dealing with many difficult personalities, as pitchers tend to be the most persnickity players in a game which inherently lends itself to that.  I think you'd be hard pressed to find someone informed who disagreed with the notion that of the big 4 sports, baseball players are far and away the most superstitious.  By the very nature of the catcher/pitcher relationship, catchers are forced to collaborate and find out what brings out the best in a pitcher, and also when the pitcher has lost his stuff.  I think Baker's lack of experience in this aspect is telling.

"There's no success like failure, and failure's no success at all." -B. Dylan

by Wood20K on May 9, 2006 5:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

Optimism?
At this point in the 1906 season (game wise, not by date) the White Sox were under .500 with a bunch of teams ahead of them (Ok, I looked it up but at the moment I can't remember their exact position, but I know they were near bottom in the AL).  

As you may know, no doubt know the 1906 White Sox won the AL then faced the Cubs in the World Series.

by DrCrawdad on May 11, 2006 12:18 AM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Maybe it's time to take a deep breath

Recent FanPosts

Zambrano_background_2_small
What is the most likely move in June regarding current players?
Small
Draft Prep: Pierce Johnson
Small
Trying to be positive (need some help)
Small
Soriano back to Second?
Small
Javier Baez Peoria Bound?
Small
Draft Prep: Conference Tournament Version
Despite-an-inflated-babip-lahair-is-no-one-month-wonder
Suddenly, I feel your pain
Small
Start of the LaHair Regression?
Dsc06783_small
Rookie Season Ticket Open House

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Doug Glanville On His Teammate, Kerry Wood
Thanks.
Samardzija takes a dig at Hawk Harrelson
Chicago vs. Chicago, Round 2.
Wrigley Field Photo Gallery

Recent FanShots

Wrigley Field Supporters Propose Tearing Down Rest Of Chicago
2012 Stars and Stripes Hat
Sveum moves Castro back to #2 spot
OT: Tyler Colvin bats 2nd
The Pittsburgh Pirates Offensive Catastrophe
Roy Halladay Bobblehead Fail
Full sized image
All The Topps Baseball Card Cubs, 1951 - 2012
Rob Neyer answers the question: When should the Cubs call up Anthony Rizzo?
Don't Have MLB Network? You Might Get Shut Out Of A Playoff Telecast

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Featured Poll

Poll
Should the National League adopt the designated hitter rule?

  963 votes | Results

Cubs By The Numbers

Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.

Click here to order your copy, available now!

Recent Stories in Chicago Cubs Game Threads

Yahoo_full_count

Recent Stories in Ticket Exchanges


Managing Editor

Alyellontoppscard_small Al Yellon

Front Page Contributors

Profile_small Josh Timmers

B_w_avatar_small Brett Taylor

Marvin_the_martian_small Shawn Domagal-Goldman

Other Contributors

Toonmike_small Mike Bojanowski

Dsc_0139_small David Sameshima