Yesterday's poll
I've stayed away from this site for quite a while now, simply because I feel no one here is interested in discussion. I described this place as driving your car at a tree, then blowing the horn and expecting the tree to get out of the way. New ideas are met with a slammed door if they disagree with the worldview that the status quo is sufficient.
At least on the other sites, people are open to new ideas. Even CCD changed his mind just yesterday on the whole Cubs-terrible customer service/brick issue once logic was explained to him. Wow. Opinion modified by new evidence! What a novel concept.
But what brings me to start my first ever diary here is two of your foulest balls, Sara and cubbiejulie. Yesterday, they went off on a 16 year old girl for supposedly doing my dirty work and starting a poll over here. My purpose? To make BTI'ers look foolish.
Like most of you need my help.
Go re-read how that whole thing originated over at 1060. Then look at the comments here. You'd think I had been planning this for weeks.
This site claims to have community standards. Those standards have allowed people to be accused of illegal acts and called out by ad hominem after ad hominem. Well, the biggest reason why is those two banana hammocks, Sara and cubbbieulie. These two "womyn" (can't have "man" in "woman") have done more to make this place a hostile, unfriendly environment than just about anyplace on the web outside of Little Green Footballs.
That these two are allowed to continue to post here sickens me. I have no idea what their relationship is and if they are coordinating their attacks against those of us with differing opinions. All I can guess is that the relationship is unique.
I wonder which of them wears the goatee?
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
66 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
it was actually monday.
by mike bornemann @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Jun 21, 2006 4:27 PM CDT reply actions
Well...
It's too late, Chuck. People already made up their minds about you, and you don't really help them change it.
Yeah, enjoy the show mike
Chuck, just because I'm too old for you to be friends with does not mean you should come over here and share your freakish opinions.
But *sigh, I guess we'll just have to read you spew out the words "ad hominem" about a thousand times and then you can crawl back into your hole.
didn't say I enjoyed it.
by mike bornemann @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Jun 21, 2006 4:35 PM CDT up reply actions
eh
by mike bornemann @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Jun 21, 2006 5:29 PM CDT up reply actions
Too old?
Wow. What a modern, creative analogy. I'd guess that you're at least 80 or 90.
Gotta be tough keeping your skin so moist.
Don't know
by Faith plus 1 on Jun 22, 2006 1:40 AM CDT up reply actions
Is this crap what you want people to be open to?
You fancy yourself someone who has mastered the art of intelligent conversation and argument, but can't recognize how flawed the three choice poll was?
And with all the insults that are hurled at this site and Al in particular, is it really that great a stretch of imagination to think that you may have attempted to orchestrate something for the sole purpose of making the people who dare to disagree with you look stupid?
Of course, you calling them names and suggesting that they have a lesbian relationship goes a long way to help your argument.
by Scott @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Jun 21, 2006 4:37 PM CDT reply actions
As I have previously stated...
by santo for prez on Jun 21, 2006 4:48 PM CDT up reply actions
I'm pretty sure...
Johan Santana is hot. :)
Is this someone else?
Are you kidding?
Look how incredibly hot he is?
http://www.talksox.com/sim/michael_restovich.jpg
Aww look at that oily bulbous face. So attractive to a woman.
Mmm... alright who's still hungry for lunch?
she
by Sarah Hope on Wednesday, June 21, 2006 at 10:17 AM CST
[ Parent | Reply to This ]
Sarah,
that's a BAD photo. He's much hotter than that. Seriously.
"Aw, how could he lose the ball in the sun, he's from Mexico!"--Harry Caray
by cubbiejulie on Wednesday, June 21, 2006 at 12:43 PM CST
[ Parent | Reply to This ]
Oh trust me
I had to look very hard for a picture that bad of him. :)
she
by Sarah Hope on Wednesday, June 21, 2006 at 1:38 PM CST
[ Parent | Reply to This ]
thats terrible
here this guy is, a professional ballplayer, helps old ladies across the street, cures cancer, and all you can say about him is that he's hot?
for shame julie, for shame.
by tomas21 on Wednesday, June 21, 2006 at 1:42 PM CST
[ Parent | Reply to This ]
LMAO!!
Touche, tomas. Touche.
she
by Sarah Hope on Wednesday, June 21, 2006 at 1:44 PM CST
[ Parent | Reply to This ]
huh?
didn't you complain about those other Cubs blogs posting pictures of hot women? how is this different? because it's linked?
by TerryS on Wednesday, June 21, 2006 at 1:44 PM CST
[ Parent | Reply to This ]
That was a joke, me posting that.
It was funny. Because that guy said why do people have a crush on him??
Is this thing on??
Anyway, that was just Ivychat putting up the hot girls of 24. Ugh...
she
by Sarah Hope on Wednesday, June 21, 2006 at 1:46 PM CST
[ Parent | Reply to This ]
i was just saying
that out of left field there's a discussion of whether a potential cub was hot or not and that didn't seem very different from posting pictures of the hot girls. neither one had much to do with whether he'd be a bust like every other hendry trade.
by TerryS on Wednesday, June 21, 2006 at 1:55 PM CST
[ Parent | Reply to This ]
Oh no,
I just thought it was funny that Will said "Why does everyone have such a crush on him?" speaking of his trade value. It was just funny.
she
by Sarah Hope on Wednesday, June 21, 2006 at 1:57 PM CST
[ Parent | Reply to This ]
LOL
I agree. i thought your response was funny. and by the way, i believe that you and cubbiejulie and will71081 have every right to debate his hotness.
i care more about OBP, but to each his or her own. :)
by TerryS on Wednesday, June 21, 2006 at 2:04 PM CST
[ Parent | Reply to This ]
I didn't make any reference to his hotness
that was all cubbiejulie!!!!
I can't even count the amount of times that someone uses Restovich/Theriot as reasons why Dusty is running the team poorly. Is that all we have left people????
It's just depressing if that's it.
"You know what God told the cubs. Don't do anything until I get back!" Pete Rose
by Will71081 on Wednesday, June 21, 2006 at 2:11 PM CST
[ Parent | Reply to This ]
Hahahahahahaha!!
Poor Will. You got sucked into this!
We don't really care whether he's hot or not. If they all looked like Bynum but hit like DiMaggio, I'd be fine with it!!
she
by Sarah Hope on Wednesday, June 21, 2006 at 2:15 PM CST
[ Parent | Reply to This ]
by santo for prez on Jun 21, 2006 6:07 PM CDT up reply actions
Perhaps my sarcasm didn't translate via type..
For the record, "bulbous" is not a flattering term for someone's face.
I was making fun of him.
Chuck,
So...
That's a broad generalization if I ever saw one.
No it isn't.
Less than a week ago
From MLB Trade Rumors..
So every other post..
Chuck I do not understand what you are hoping to accomplish here.. I mean if you are trying to defend Sparks honor..okay.. she doesn't seem too upset about it. The way you are coming off is just as a cheap way to bash two members of a site man. I am neutral in this and dislike the whole bickering I get enough of that at work. I just do not understand the need to post this diary.
by cubsfan2883 on Jun 21, 2006 11:39 PM CDT up reply actions
OK.
But please don't generalize. That's the reason the poll was started by me. It was because you and others were generalizing.
What ideas have been slammed? Wanna discuss? Let's discuss those without offending anyone. What do you want to discuss? You can also jump right in to the discussion of a possible Jacque Jones trade, Dusty Baker, Wood's problems, or just respond to a post like JoshinLA's today about the topic of the sale and why it isn't going to happen. If you don't come it's not because no one wants to discuss, it's because you don't want to.
Wow
Wow. And the rest of your misogynistic, homophobic and insult-filled post was a great way to start a discussion, too.
Don't let the door hit you on the way out.
Have to jump in here
Insinuating that someone is gay does not make one homophobic. It might make the person bigoted, but only if the person they are talking about is, in fact, gay.
Additionally, it's not even slander - unless you are arguing that there is something wrong wiith being gay. If so, you are saying the same thing you are criticizing that person for.
Words have definitions foor a reason.
by pwhalen on Jun 21, 2006 8:57 PM CDT up reply actions
Way to go...
I don't think the people calling him homophobic think being gay is a bad thing, but merely pointing out the fact that he was treating it as an insult. Therefore, since he used the gay jokes to belittle them both, it WAS slander.
Your logic was fallacious, because you used circular logic, or "begging the question". You can't prove implicitly or explicitly that a person is homophobic because they call someone else homophobic.
I do agree that that term is probably thrown around too much, but damnit man, make sense when you post.
by CosmicCharlie911 on Jun 21, 2006 11:16 PM CDT up reply actions
Did any of you people pass English?
Main Entry: 2slander
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English sclaundre, slaundre, from Old French esclandre, from Late Latin scandalum stumbling block, offense -- more at SCANDAL
1 : the utterance of false charges or misrepresentations which defame and damage another's reputation
2 : a false and defamatory oral statement about a person -- compare LIBEL
- slan·der·ous -d(&-)r&s adjective
- slan·der·ous·ly adverb
- slan·der·ous·ness noun
If there is nothing wrong with being gay it cannot defame or damage him.
Therefore if you are calling it slander, you are saying there is something wrong with being gay.
It's not a circular arguement at all. To avoid hurting anyones feelings here I use my own heritage as an example. I'm Irish so I will take the lliberty of using the term Mick here. If I call Yao Ming a lazy mick, can he sue for slander or libel? No. If I call him a theif, however, he could. Because a theif is a bad thing which could damage his reputation.
Not slander, and not a homophobic comment. Insensitive, yes. Stupid, yes.
by pwhalen on Jun 22, 2006 5:36 PM CDT up reply actions
Whatever, man...
by CosmicCharlie911 on Jun 22, 2006 10:07 PM CDT up reply actions
Oh
It's homophobia when bringing up one's sexual preferences is completely irrelevant to the subject at hand. And it's an insult to assume that any woman who isn't deferential to men is a lesbian.
Get real. Of course it was a homophobic insult. To pretend otherwise is to be complicit in their hate speech.
by Josh Timmers on Jun 22, 2006 12:49 AM CDT up reply actions
wrong
One entry found for homophobia.
Main Entry: ho·mo·pho·bia
Pronunciation: "hO-m&-'fO-bE-&
Function: noun
: irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against homosexuality or homosexuals
- ho·mo·pho·bic -'fO-bik adjective
tell me how his comments qualify under the definition of homophobia.
by pwhalen on Jun 22, 2006 5:46 PM CDT up reply actions
nope
see the actual definition in my reply below. You're not even close.
"Of course it was a homophobic insult. To pretend otherwise is to be complicit in their hate speech."
geez, wrong again. To point out otherwise only indicates that I understand the English langauge.
by pwhalen on Jun 22, 2006 5:50 PM CDT up reply actions
that reply
by pwhalen on Jun 22, 2006 5:52 PM CDT up reply actions
I'm not a big fan of Chuck....
Chuck's no saint, but he's right in saying some of the things being bandied about here are CLEARLY across the line. Over a basenball game.
Two wrongs don't make a right, to trot out the ol' cliche.
I was going to stay out of this...
Nor will I ever.
Well,
Link.
Although Chuck and Gaius are not one
by Will71081 @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Jun 22, 2006 8:24 AM CDT up reply actions
Not the point
Wow...
So....congrats, I guess.
by CosmicCharlie911 on Jun 22, 2006 11:11 AM CDT up reply actions
Interesting....
Al: As for this diary and your desire to "stay out of it", I think you were being irresponsible. This is your blog and if people are slandered or abusive to another member, you have the responsibility to intervene. IMHO, this diary should have been shut due to Chuck's initial posting.
he who is getting tired of this...
by timeforachange on Jun 21, 2006 8:20 PM CDT reply actions
I thought about that quite a bit...
I would like to see this sniping put to rest forever, frankly.
Tritely, I quote Rodney King: "Can't we all just get along?"
Re
Chuck may be on the fringe, but there's hardly some barren desert between him and the next person toward the center. I also suspect your decision to allow virtually anything that's not illegal to transpire has, at times, been mistaken for approval, and that your primary goal is to let the community develop and evolve in whatever direction it may.
That's a very hard to thing to do. Props for resisting the desire to shape and control it beyond what's absolutely necessary.
Visit The Digital Gazette
And I suspect
It's well to remember that you don't know everything, Jed.
Choose your words (and who you share them with) wisely.
Sorry if it's been asked, but here's my question
Or do I want to know?
You probably don't..
by santo for prez on Jun 21, 2006 9:27 PM CDT up reply actions
If it's what I think it is...
Let's just say...
It's a pleasure to know such a hypocrite...
Congratulations, you have just blown my mind.
by CosmicCharlie911 on Jun 21, 2006 10:57 PM CDT up reply actions
Now that...
Actually, I don't know CosmicCharlie, and don't know if his posts are usually this witty, but I have to say that as the Cubs season has gotten worse, the comments on this site seem to have gone downhill with them (although, when I first came here in the offseason, some of the exchanges with Gaius were fairly sharp).
by jcub on Jun 22, 2006 6:14 PM CDT up reply actions
To be realistic
other affiliated sites. It's just two girls trash talking, and if somebody takes it seriously, they need to step waaaaaaaaaay back and take it easy. There's real....crap on some of the other SB sites. This is of no consequence.
You need to do what I did -- go to Mexico and forget about the Cubs, baseball, whatever makes you angry and hostile. Or, at least go to Aurora, Peoria, whatever. Get away for a while, buddy, please -- until your wish comes true, and Mark Cuban or Fidel Castro buys the Cubs.
by Smooth Jazz Man San Diego on Jun 21, 2006 10:43 PM CDT reply actions
I agree
to quote Dr. Hibbert, from the Simpsons: "The best tonic is the chronic."
I hope that wasn't too illegal for you.
by CosmicCharlie911 on Jun 21, 2006 11:03 PM CDT up reply actions
Cuban or Castro?
I like that.
Or they at least masquerade as such....
by CosmicCharlie911 on Jun 21, 2006 10:58 PM CDT up reply actions
yeah...
by CosmicCharlie911 on Jun 21, 2006 11:19 PM CDT up reply actions
While I ..
This (expletive) has gotten out of hand. Mariotti is a (expletive) (expletive). (Expletive Expletive ) Thank you.
Just to stay off topic
Cuban, for how pissed off he gets, has a pretty good sense of humor, too.
Wait...Castro, Cuban...Castro IS Cuban.
That's odd...
Awww ... poor Colonel Blimp
Awww ... let Mommy kiss it and make it better.
by Gregory on Jun 23, 2006 4:08 AM CDT reply actions

by 




















