The Pod Cubs
Remember this movie?

Or, maybe you remember the 1978 remake with Leonard Nimoy and Donald Sutherland. In any case, the basic plotline is that aliens, who come to Earth in "pods", slowly take over Earth people's bodies, after which they wind up acting zombie-like, following blindly the dictates of an unseen power, until they take over Earth.
The 1978 film was more of a standard science-fiction flick; the original 1956 version was a political allegory, implying that the Communists were taking over the USA in just this way -- remember, that was in the Red Scare era. (Incidentally, both of these are well worth renting.)
The point of all of this is that a number of years ago (I think it was during the 2001 season, when the Cubs came from nowhere to contend), Jeff & I tagged our favorite team the "Pod Cubs", whenever they'd do something totally out of character with what had come before.
That's sort of what happened today, isn't it? I mean, could the REAL Glendon Rusch have pitched that well, allowing only three runs in five innings, striking out five? Could the REAL Jacque Jones have had three more hits, hiking his average to .301? Could the REAL Roberto Novoa not only throw a scoreless inning, but also get a hit? They turned double plays! The new guy hit a homer! Scott Williamson was the lone holdout (the Donald Sutherland character, or the Kevin McCarthy character from the original film) -- he had a shaky ninth inning and had to be replaced by Bob Howry, who made it interesting before ending it. Incidentally, even though Williamson supposedly left with an "injury", I have a feeling that was a ruse to allow Howry time to warm up.
But you see the basic problem here. These HAVE to be the Pod Cubs.
And if they are -- keep them here as long as humanly possible.
The Cubs, or Pod Cubs, have now won two straight series, taking today's game 8-5, and actually looking darn good in the process.
Our friends at Viva El Birdos were quite sympathetic when Derrek Lee got hurt back in April:
a real shame; the cubs-cards rivalry will be diminished by his absence, as will the playoff races. the injury will probably cost the cubs several games in the standings that they can't afford to give up; even the prospect of kerry wood's return next month can't compensate.
He was right, you know; it came down exactly as predicted there, and here, and it now becomes a good thing that the Cubs are playing a little bit better with Lee perhaps only two or three weeks from returning to action. But the reason I mention this, of course, is that the Cardinals' equivalent of Lee, Albert Pujols, left today's game in the second inning with a strained oblique muscle. They say he will be "evaluated" again tomorrow, which likely means he'll sit out the series finale.
Pujols is leading the major leagues in runs, HR, RBI and slugging percentage; he is dominating baseball, and doing it without (at least not from me) any suspicion of pharmacological assistance.
He's a great player. It's always more fun to defeat your greatest rival at full strength -- it makes the rivalry better, I'm sure you'd agree. Further, it's even better if you can hold their best player at bay, and in fact, the Cubs had done a pretty good job of that this year (5-for-29, only one HR, including today). I never wish illness or injury on any ballplayer.
That said, if Pujols is out for any length of time -- and that cannot yet be known -- Cardinal fans are about to find out what it's like to have an offense resembling the Royals', just as we have for the last forty games. Without Pujols, and with Jim Edmonds apparently still headed to the DL, the Cardinals have only Scott Rolen and seven other hitters who, frankly, don't even match up with the Cubs' current lineup. It will likely have the effect of bringing the Cardinals back to the pack in the NL Central.
The preview pages still say Kerry Wood will face Jason Marquis tomorrow, but it was announced on WGN radio that the Cubs will push Wood back to Tuesday in Houston, thus keeping him, Greg Maddux and Carlos Zambrano on rotation. Maddux, who beat the Cardinals in St. Louis on April 23, will go for the sweep tomorrow.
The last time the Cubs swept the Cardinals twice in one season was in 1978, when they, believe it or not, swept them the first four times they played them, twelve straight wins on their way to a 15-3 record vs. St. Louis. (Don't believe me? Click on the link above.)
They'll play the Cardinals eleven more times this year, including tomorrow, and are already 6-2.
Pod Cubs. Keep 'em here forever.
47 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Right?
I have to say I truly feel for the Cards fans because this time sucks the worst...waiting for the report. I personally was pumped to see him break that piece of crap Bond's record. Maybe he still can...who knows?
Anyone believe Bonds when he said he will be angry if Pujols doesn't break his record?
He is so full of __. He obviously chose to listen to his PR guy that day.
Pujols
And yes, I admit that Pujols is the best player in baseball right now--and one that neither the Cardinals nor MLB really wants to be without right now.
Four out of Five now
I hope Pujols will be okay
The first thought
Well, I hope he returns to the lineup Monday against the Reds after we're out of town.
I agree...
Yeah, no doubt
Are you guys kidding?
I can only root against him...
Wow
Annoyed
I don't mean to jump on Perkins. I agree with what he said. I'll root against the Card's 1st baseman regardless of how funny a name he has.
Go ahead and express yourself. That's what makes this site so incredible. If you want to be a smartass, be a smartass. The different personalities and opinions make this interesting reading.
What annoys me are the useless comments that seem to overwhelm the thoughtful comments. I don't bother to dig through 200-500 game post comments anymore. The off-day and summary posts seem to have more thoughtful dialog.
There seemed to be more intelligent back-and-forth dialogue last year. Now there seems to be a lot of comments that have a short title and a body of n/t. Some people actually post play by play or inning summaries, or simply the score -- like the dedicated sports news sites can't do that better? There are also chat rooms dedicated to discussing the Cubs as the game progresses.
I'm all for freedom of expression when it comes to my beloved Cubs. But come on, if you sit at your computer hoping to be the first person to post a comment that only says "7-3", then don't waste everyone's time.
by Andy @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Jun 3, 2006 10:34 PM CDT up reply actions
I dunno, Andy...
If you don't like doing that, then you don't have to participate in those threads. I do think there are many other threads that engender good discussion here; that's one reason I post a wrapup of each game, even the road games that I don't attend.
This has become a good community with many different people participating, and I don't want to discourage ANY form of participation.
After seeing JJ's third hit and walk...
Now only if..
LaRussa
It will be interesting...
That's too bad. I wanted Pujols to have a historic season.
maybe
No Worries Here
This team and this management regime has found a way to win 93 to 105 games every year since 2000, save one year. The only thing they didn't find a way to compensate for was the loss of Isringhausen in 2003. They'll be fine, and I have no reason to believe that they will be in anything other than first place when Pujols comes back.
Lance
La Russa after the game re Pujols
Wow.
Can Rolen really carry this team? He has nice numbers, but how much of that is from batting behind Pujols/Edmonds? This month is looking more and more like a good oppertunity to make up ground.
Makes for an interesting season
1978 Cubs
However, the Cubs still didn't finish last in the league in homers. Houston, with just 70, had the honor, with the Astrodome keeping homers to a minimum. And it got worse for Houston in 1979, when the team hit just 49 homers. The 1979 Astros, with 49 homers and 55 complete games, are almost certainly the last major league team ever to have more complete games by their pitchers than home runs by their hitters.
MLB.TV audio
I don't think Joe Buck should be allowed to call cards games for the national broadcasts. He is such a homer and it's obvious in his game calling. He says Rusch has a problem with the HR but doesn't mention that Mulder has given up only 2 fewer HRs... just things like that. He is quick to point out flaws on other teams and strengths on the cards...
What does this say about the coaching?
Maybe it's just coincidence, or a matter of timing, but part of me is wondering if Baker brings his team's A game to against every team?
by gathas on Jun 3, 2006 10:52 PM CDT reply actions
They don't...
I don't know why they can't play like this against the bad teams. I mean they are the bad teams. Teams are supposed to beat them, and the Cubs haven't done a good job the last couple seasons.
Buck sucks
Also, Prior did well tonight. In case anyone missed it, he threw 5 innings, 59 total pitches, 43 were for strikes. He gave up 1 run, 3 or so hits, and had 5 k's (this is coming from memory, so may be slightly off). Thats a good sign, as Wood is still pretty sore. I hope he doesn't have major problems again, I am thinking it is just soreness.
If we can put together a couple of good weeks here, with Pagan, Prior, and Lee on the way, I think things are looking up. Only time will tell I guess.
by ryno @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Jun 3, 2006 11:26 PM CDT reply actions
Anybody know how hard Prior threw?
I do feel bad....
But don't start thinking I am not happy that this really shakes up the division. I think the Cubs are sitting very pretty right now. A sweep of the Cards would be an incredible psychological boost and then taking the series against the Astros would boost them in the standings a bit.
I really like where we are. If only we can keep the bone-headed plays down.
I wonder if there is some law of the baseball gods that says that Albert and DLee cannot play at the same time for a certain amount of time or something. Just weird.
Hopefully they will both be back in time for the Cubs/Cardinals NLCS ;)
by coopergillan on Jun 4, 2006 12:08 AM CDT reply actions
Agreed
Let's take stock
Lineup: Bench:
- Pierre, CF 1. Nevin, IF
- Walker, 2B 2. Perez, IF
- Lee, 1B 3. Blanco, C
- Barrett, C 4. Pagan, OF
- Ramirez, 3B 5. Mabry, IF/OF
- Jones, RF 6. Womack, IF
- Murton, LF
- Cedeno, SS
- Wood, RHP 1. Miller, RHP
- Prior, RHP 2. Ohman/Williamson, R/L
- Zambrano, RHP 3. Rusch, LHP
- Maddux, RHP 4. Howry, RHP
- Marshall, LHP 5. Eyre, LHP
We have 9 games against the Astros before the break, and 8 against the Brewers, both of whom have been struggling. After the break, we have 10 games against the Cardinals, 6 against the Astros, and a number against weaker teams like the Pirates, Nats, and the like. I'd say if we can get within 5 or 6 games of first by the break, then we may just have a shot at taking the division. The recent trifecta of injuries to the Cardinals has opened the doors wide in the NL Central. The Cubs are going to have to play some damn good ball, and it may be a longshot, but it's still possible. I have hope. To quote Major League, "Then there's only one thing to do...win the whole f*ckin' thing." As much as I hate to see a guy like Pujols go down, I'm glad to have some small measure of hope for this season. This road trip is going to be key...let's win some ballgames!
Wow...
the guy is all over gaius...
Kurt...
What Frank in the below post doesn't tell you
You may view them as "brother bloggers" but CCD and Gaius are both cowards when their views are challenged. They love to do hit and runs against the Cubs on their site, as well as yours, because they know that they'll be allowed to get away with their hateful, drivel.
When someone like me has the audacity to come on and point out their foolish statements, incorrect, incoherent, ramblings, concerning the Cubs, they have no other choice but to get rid of the offending party that has the nerve to show others that the emperor has no clothes.
They were losing their "hate Cubs" board to someone that could go toe to toe with them on the Cubs, so they did the only thing that a dictator can do, they banned me from the board.
I don't care, but some on that board we're beginning to fight back and dictators can't have that.
So, as they may present the lie (by their silence) that I've left whereas I was canned for standing up to them, I'm left with no other option but to monitor other boards and show their views for the flotsam and dredge that they are.
You people, if you love the Cubs, should be running the Gaius' of the world OFF your boards with sound, precise rebuttals to the foolishness they spew forth "clothed" under the guise of a "distraught" Cubs fan.
Now I don't mean banning them from your boards like they did me. I mean using their own words to show the fallacy of their views. CCD and Gaius have a long history that's easily found through their archives, showing the foolish trades that they harangued Hendry for NOT making, trades of people that are currently on the DL. While they try to destroy Hendry for his moves, they react like vampires to a cross when you bring up their own outlandish comments from previous posts.
Sadly though, I'm sure their archives will also disappear so that the big lie that is their site can continue unabated.
Don't let some misleading title like "1060 West" confuse you with what should really be named "Old Comiskey."
by Kurt on Jun 4, 2006 11:24 AM CDT up reply actions
Whatever
Your reply to my single sentence was several paragraphs of unreasoned invective that would never be allowed to stand on BCB. And as I pointed out in my reply to your reply is that the definition of homophobia as provided by your source of choice, Dictionary.com, is that it is a fear of or contempt for lesbians and gays. So I think my assessment is correct.
As I have pointed out before, I participate much more on BCB than I do on 1060 West. I've been reading and posting on the Cubs Usenet newsgroup for over a decade now. I'm my own person and form and hold my own opinions. I'm not anybody's water carrier. Have a good one.
A lie by omission is still a lie, Frank
Whereas I twisted a moniker, he corrupts a man's given Christian name.
You didn't mention that salient fact because the "rest of the story" blows a hole in your little thesis, so it wasn't going to be included in the carefully constructed house of cards that you've built.
Anyone can go back and read the "Ole Comiskey Parks" blog (they call themselves "1060 West" to hide their true intentions) under the Red alert Diary to see how you've carefully left out my explanation.
That's the WHOLE truth, but as the "prince of the power of the air" hates the truth, in this case Frank, the truth is not in you either as you intentionally omit my explanation. I say intentionally because you paraphrased from Webster's dictionary comment which was also in that posting.
As to your plaintive plea that "... unreasoned invective that would never be allowed to stand on BCB." In a nutshell that's all you have, begging for this board to silence me as well. You don't want your words regurgitated back at you exposing how you use misdirection when caught in a lie. Recognizing that this board is very P.C., your only hope is that I will also be banned from here as well, thereby giving you a relatively free path to trash the Cub organization. That does work on 1060 West's blog. Opposing views will not be allowed by those like yourself that accept only one world view, whilst others must be cut off lest an opposing view show how little merit and vacant of substance theirs really is.
Again, if anyone would take the time to read the messages in "Red Alert" they'd quickly find that the only real weapon the likes of you and Gauis have are to stifle opinions that you find unpopular.
That's why you have your own hate-filled (against the Cubs) site. It's nothing more than an anti-cult following walking in lockstep with their Cub hating leader.
Y'all don't mind going on other boards to trash Cub fans, but when someone like me comes along and unmasks you for the tin men that you are, you react in an expected fashion. I'm banned on their board as the heat has become too hot in "their own kitchen" so you plaintively plea to AL with "that would never be allowed to stand on BCB" in the hopes that your mewling in his direction will also remove me from this premise. Therefore you and your ilk can continue to thrash the Cubs unabated without a reasoned response from one more adept at showcasing your own foolish Cub-hating foibles.
by Kurt on Jun 4, 2006 3:46 PM CDT up reply actions
Again, whatever
So far I have no evidence that you have been banned from 1060 West. There's been no mention of it on the site. The thread is still there for anyone to read if they wish to do so.
Yes please read Kurt's thoughts
by Santos Sorrow @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Jun 4, 2006 5:29 PM CDT up reply actions
The best part of that thread
Nice.
who?
by ksucubbie on Jun 5, 2006 11:43 PM CDT up reply actions
You, Kurt
by Thunderclap Newman on Jun 5, 2006 11:36 AM CDT up reply actions
Newman is once again
Here are the first couple of posts on the Red Alert diary.
You'll notice that when I try to comment you'll see by the top line that Gaius and the rest of the cowards have banned me because they can't handle the heat. Newman's just a toady that does their bidding like the little yapping wiener dog that he is. I don't even answer him as he's so small on the totem pole over their.
It's interesting how Gaius will slam the Cubs on every board including this one, but he can't handle be mauled by me on his own board, so rather than take me on in a battle of wits that he's lost too many times up too this point, he just banned me, as you'll see below.
When I log on to make a comment, look what the webmaster has done in the top line. Gaius and his little demons have n o problem polluting your board, but coward that he is, he bans dissenting opinions on his board.
"Banned by webmaster. Your comments will not be added"
Not sure if anyone posted this classic Dusty quote in reference to Prior's less than stellar performance in Peoria on Monday, but here it is...
"Anybody that's been in baseball knows the toughest guys to pitch against are Minor League guys," Baker said. "Those kids are out there swinging."
Maddog | Homepage | 06.02.06 - 7:01 pm | #
lets hope we get the lights out marshall and not the fla/sf marshall
ksucubbie | 06.02.06 - 7:07 pm | #
there are so many reasons why our lineup makes me sad tonight
A. Murton isnt in the 2 spot
B. Ramierz is heating up so bat him higher than 5th
C. Tony Womack
D. we just traded for Nevin and he isnt playing....
ksucubbie | 06.02.06 - 7:14 pm | #
by Kurt on Jun 5, 2006 10:18 PM CDT up reply actions
you know
by ksucubbie on Jun 5, 2006 11:42 PM CDT up reply actions

by 



















