Scoring change lowers Maddux's ERA

by Will23 on Jul 19, 2006 1:48 PM CDT Comment 12 comments

from ESPN.com...

Scoring change, 8 weeks later, lowers Maddux's ERA

It says it lowered his ERA by 1/3 of 1 point to 4.60 from 4.99, and that Cedeno would be charged with an error from the game on May 24 against the Marlins.

Filler - (Sorry Al)
(One-line diaries are prohibited on Bleed Cubbie Blue. Give your diary a bit more thought, then give it another shot. If you have nothing to add to your proposed diary, then it probably belongs as a comment under another appropriate thread. The minimum is 300 characters.)

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.

0 recs | Comment 12 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

That is an absolutely correct ruling!

It should have been done that way in the first place. Cedeno's throw was awful.

Interesting, too, to think of it this way -- Maddux' stats now look better to potential trade partners. Think that had anything to do with it?

by Al on Jul 19, 2006 1:50 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

It looks like..

..official scorer Ron Jernick has a couple of these changes of heart (both in Marlin games), one this year and another in 2002, although both corrections were done directly after the game.

I agree that it helps Maddux's trade value - wouldn't this give him another quality start also?

Chicks dig the long ball

by Will23 on Jul 19, 2006 2:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

wow

large jump in the era dont you think? did this error lead to like four runs? i dont remember? and my damn yahoo fantasy better be on top of this if i had him in my lineup for that start

by kylejo on Jul 19, 2006 1:55 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

Next time...

... read the linked article first -- it clearly says that the error led to SIX runs.

by Al on Jul 19, 2006 1:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

sorry

im at work and my filters dont allow "sports" related pages...ha somehow this one sneaks through though its nice

by kylejo on Jul 19, 2006 2:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

Sorry ...

... I didn't know you couldn't read the ESPN link.

But I'm glad BCB gets through!

by Al on Jul 19, 2006 2:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

Work Filters Stink

I have the same type of deal. I'm hoping BCB doesn't get immense popularity where I work so it doesn't get the attention of the filter nazis :)

That's why I had so much trouble yesterday trying to post the boxscore link.

Go Nebraska Football! Beat USC!

by sanantonecub on Jul 19, 2006 4:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

Why?

Is this something teams regularly do? Or could it be an indication of trying to improve maddog's stats for a trade?

"As tempting as it is to bury these guys right now... I just can't do it."

by cubbieblue on Jul 19, 2006 2:02 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

Good question.

It does say the Cubs had appealed the decision -- it doesn't say when that appeal was made, though.

by Al on Jul 19, 2006 2:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

Ehh..

..I doubt that there is enough brain power in the organization to come up with such a slick move like this to help Maddux's trade value. Sounds more like dumb luck.

Chicks dig the long ball

by Will23 on Jul 19, 2006 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

Does the Water Cooler get anything out of this

This was the incident that caused the normally composed
Maddux to attack the water cooker
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33B8RRvIiEQ&search=maddux <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33B8RRvIiEQ&search=maddux>

Maddux has had more than his share of these
this year. This one was could be appealed but
Friday's extra run due to Walker/Cedeno error
could not not to mention general bad fielding
& run support. I think most GM's know that Maddux
is better than his ERA and record would indicate

by jessica on Jul 19, 2006 2:06 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs