Andruw Jones claimed on waviers...but who?
..via ESPN.com (Yahoo doesn't have the story yet)
Andruw Jones claimed on waivers; 10-5 rights loom
First Paragraph..
"With Andruw Jones only days away from gaining trade veto power, the All-Star center fielder was claimed on waivers by an unnamed team, leaving the Braves until 1 p.m. ET Saturday to decide whether to take their last opportunity to deal Jones unfettered." -Buster Olney
Who could it be, now?
(Sorry if this is a duplicate diary...please feel free to BOO)
From the AJC:
HOW WAIVERS WORK
-To be traded after July 31, a player must first clear waivers.
-Teams can put up to seven players on the waiver list per day.
-A player has three full working days (Monday through Friday) to clear.
-Teams can claim players in reverse order of the standings based on winning percentage.
-If a player is claimed, he can be withdrawn. Sometimes the teams then work out a deal anyway, which is allowed.
-Teams often put in claims to block potential deals involving a team they are competing with for a playoff spot.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
0 recs |
75 comments
Comments
Cubs
by CubFaninCA on Aug 4, 2006 2:09 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Not sure but..
Surprised Jones put on waivers
And they already dealt for Javy Lopez earlier today. Busy day for Mr. Epstein.
by Will23 on Aug 4, 2006 2:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who do they have
I just don't see Atlanta making a deal.
by colossus on Aug 4, 2006 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It would be surprising...
by mportsch on Aug 4, 2006 2:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Al had also reported..
by Will23 on Aug 4, 2006 2:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Keep in mind that....
by fuzzycubfan on Aug 4, 2006 3:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Correct.
by mportsch on Aug 4, 2006 2:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not sure, but.....
by colossus on Aug 4, 2006 2:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pie is on the 40 man roster
by JonH on Aug 4, 2006 3:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, if my understanding of waivers is correct
by false cognate on Aug 4, 2006 2:13 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Yup.
A lineup with Jones can have a high OBP guy like a cheap Murton in the corner.
by frustratedfan on Aug 4, 2006 2:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yep,
by CubFaninCA on Aug 4, 2006 2:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you are correct
they said there were multiple claims on him. Given that, we can assume the winning team was an NL team, since they have first preference.
The following teams COULD have made the claim:
Chicago, though i really doubt it. I think it would be a great move to claim him and try to work a deal (much smarter than giving Carlos Lee a long deal). Since i no longer think Hendry is smart, i doubt its us.
The Mets, Cardinals, Padres, DBacks and Cinci are unlikely, as they all have good CF production, and none have someone in front of them (ie better record) that they would want to block by claiming Jones.
The Astros are a possibility, as they have a hole in CF and were reportedly trying to get him before the deadline, but they probably don't want to take on salary, and they don't have a lot of talent that would 1. slip though waivers and 2. Atlanta would want. So i doubt it's them. They also don't really have anyone to block by claiming him.
The Dodgers are probably the most likely. The don't have much in CF now, and they have been extremely aggressive this year, perhaps aware that the NL is very weak right now, so it would be a good year to load up for a run. Doesn't mean they will be able to come to a deal, but i think they are the most liekly.
Philly is out as they have removed themselves from competition this year. Milwaukee is out, somewhat for the same reason, but also because they have an overcrowded OF to begin with, and an expensive short-term OF doesn't really fit their philosophy. San Fran already has an expensive CF in Finley, and they can't really see themselves as a contender.
Colorado is a possibility. They are not getting much out of CF, and Jones would be a monster in coors.
Florida is a long shot, even though there was talk of them trying to take on salary in case mlb makes a minimum salary. If that happens, they could just sign Soriano in the off-season and not give a division rival a bunch of talent.
So my order of likelihood is:
- Dodgers
- Astros
- Colorado
- Cubs
by tomas21 on Aug 4, 2006 2:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
hahahahahaha
Good analysis, although sad at the same time (re: the Cubs).
by false cognate on Aug 4, 2006 2:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Booooooooooooooooo
by colossus on Aug 4, 2006 2:15 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
don't play around.....
by PriorandAramisfan23 on Aug 4, 2006 3:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not
I doubt it's the Cubs though. The Astros seem more likely.
by Josh77 on Aug 4, 2006 3:47 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Dollars, offense, defense
There isn't much risk here and Hendry doesn't like big risks. Plus he brings the combo of offense and defense which the Cubs love.
I suppose we'll find out by tomorrow afternoon.
by jman on Aug 4, 2006 4:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Indeed
by CubFaninCA on Aug 4, 2006 10:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If they did claim him, offer the Braves...
by zambranofan on Aug 4, 2006 4:17 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: the 10/5 rights
by zambranofan on Aug 4, 2006 4:18 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Trade Demand Rights
by jman on Aug 4, 2006 4:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Murton for Jones
by CubFaninCA on Aug 4, 2006 5:07 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Wanna make a bet?
by colossus on Aug 4, 2006 5:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jones for Jones
by tharr on Aug 4, 2006 6:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sure
by CubFaninCA on Aug 4, 2006 5:11 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Damn
Never mind.
by colossus on Aug 4, 2006 5:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
cmon
by CubFaninCA on Aug 4, 2006 5:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I did that less than a week ago
Why don't you take the "we'll get Jones" side and I'll take the "we won't get Jones" side? Do something bold and take a chance....
by colossus on Aug 4, 2006 5:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're a very competitive...
by thing85 on Aug 4, 2006 5:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
why don't u
by CubFaninCA on Aug 4, 2006 7:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I asked my source,
by Blood Brother on Aug 4, 2006 6:07 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Stop the INSANITY!!
Feel free to dream, but I just want to be the voice of reason here in case there are any young impressionable Cub fans out there and who might actually think the Cubs are capable of doing something like this.
Besides, A. Jones would never want to play 81 games at Wrigley a year. He likes to climb walls and run into runs making spectacular plays and Wrigley would cramp his style. Not gonna happen.
Continue dreaming however.
by ADHD survivor on Aug 4, 2006 6:26 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
TYPO alert
by ADHD survivor on Aug 4, 2006 6:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm told
by colossus on Aug 4, 2006 6:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Speaking of running into brick walls
by ADHD survivor on Aug 4, 2006 6:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am hearing that
by airweino on Aug 4, 2006 7:24 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
One of the braves fans...
by santo for prez on Aug 4, 2006 7:31 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
This just put things into perspective.
Something allong the lines of; Cubs claimed Jones on waivers, who do they have that we would want? Zambrano (not by himself). Pierre (what good is speed if you can't get on base).
I think that they are being a little harsh on their analysis but I found it a little disheartening that Zambrano in the eyes of other teams is not worthy of a straight-up trade. Not to mention he is the glue that is holding this team together.
by santo for prez on Aug 4, 2006 7:39 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I would imagine...
by Al on Aug 4, 2006 8:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And
by CubFaninCA on Aug 4, 2006 8:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
They wouldn't want....
Neither would I, I'd want more than that guy.
by PopeFlick on Aug 4, 2006 8:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think we should trade Z
We could throw in some prospects or someone else too.
by colossus on Aug 4, 2006 9:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
re
Boston for Papelbon
I would only want him as long as the Cubs put him back in the rotation. But he's already said that he wouldn't mind remaining a closer.
Brian: - "Peter, those are Cheerios." - Family Guy
by VS on Aug 4, 2006 9:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Of course he'd say that
by colossus on Aug 4, 2006 9:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Of course
Brian: - "Peter, those are Cheerios." - Family Guy
by VS on Aug 5, 2006 3:16 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Make of this what you will.
Randy Wells was supposed to start for Iowa tonight, but didn't -- Les Walrond started instead, after having thrown in relief two days ago.
Think something might be up with these two?
by Al on Aug 4, 2006 8:42 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
It would be so counterintuitive...
by CosmicCharlie911 on Aug 4, 2006 9:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think he was referring
by escapegoat on Aug 4, 2006 10:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wells has value??
by CubFaninCA on Aug 4, 2006 8:42 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Look at his numbers for double A
Does anyone have a scouting report on him? It seems that Wells isn't very highly touted, but I really don't know what he has to offer.
by CosmicCharlie911 on Aug 4, 2006 8:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i looked him up
by CubFaninCA on Aug 4, 2006 8:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wells' WHIP this season...
In 101.1 combined AA/AAA innings this year he has walked 22 and struck out 86. I could see the Braves being interested in that.
He'll be 24 later this month. I wonder why he wouldn't have been called up instead of Mateo.
by Al on Aug 4, 2006 8:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
by CubFaninCA on Aug 4, 2006 8:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Especially...
I say give guys like Wells, who is clearly closer to ready, at least a start or two, so the cubs can better appraise their big league value.
by CosmicCharlie911 on Aug 4, 2006 9:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is it correct that the Cubs
by tharr on Aug 4, 2006 9:46 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'd love for the Cubs to claim him
They'll have the worst lineup in the NL if they go forward with the plans for Pierre, Izutris and Cedeno in the lineup. Thoroughly depressing and disgusting.
by Pa on Aug 4, 2006 10:27 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
2007
by Mike63 on Aug 4, 2006 10:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So Cubs players have to clear waivers?
Would Atl take something like Eric Patterson (takes over for Giles in 08), Donald Veal or Pawelek, and Gallagher???
by CubFaninCA on Aug 4, 2006 10:45 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Waivers
by Mike63 on Aug 4, 2006 11:04 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Only overblown if..
by Will23 on Aug 4, 2006 11:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Andruw Jones
by Mike63 on Aug 4, 2006 11:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're probably right
by tharr on Aug 5, 2006 2:14 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's not what I read about the 10/5 status...
by Al on Aug 5, 2006 4:19 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're right
by tharr on Aug 5, 2006 4:32 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're right...
by Al on Aug 5, 2006 4:38 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thank goodness...
by TheBeerBaron on Aug 5, 2006 12:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
we are getting closer
by geetarnwhiskey on Aug 5, 2006 12:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
rumor is
by CubFaninCA on Aug 5, 2006 1:39 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 





















