Bleed Cubbie Blue: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Spencer Hall's Sports Meme Power Rankings

The Top 100 Cubs Of All Time - #38 Rick Sutcliffe

Look ahead a few months and pretend it's July 31, 2007.

The Cubs are desperately trying to make a go at the division title, or the wild card, and they figure they need a starting pitcher. But there aren't many available, and it's a seller's market.

And so they send Felix Pie, Eric Patterson, Sean Gallagher and Carmen Pignatiello to the Orioles... for Kris Benson, Chris Gomez and Scott Williamson.

Insanity, you'd say. Giving up that much and getting a middling starting pitcher, a backup infielder/first baseman and a middle reliever/setup man?

Jim Hendry would be burned in effigy. Or maybe even not in effigy.

And yet... this is essentially the trade the Cubs made on the trading deadline of June 15, 1984 (in those years, the deadline was earlier than the present day's July 31). They traded a highly regarded #1 draft pick (Joe Carter), a young up-and-coming outfielder with power and speed (Mel Hall), a former #1 draft pick pitcher (Don Schulze), and another pitching prospect (Darryl Banks) to the Cleveland Indians.

And in return, they got a backup catcher/first baseman (Ron Hassey) and a middle reliever (George Frazier).

And Rick Sutcliffe.

Cub fans scratched their heads. It was a slightly different time -- the Cubs hadn't been thought of as contenders in 1984, had a poor spring training, but by June 15 were 34-26 and holding on to a precarious half-game lead in the old NL East. Dallas Green had made a bold trade at the end of spring training, acquiring Bob Dernier and Gary Matthews, and only a couple of weeks earlier had pried another starting pitcher out of the American League, Dennis Eckersley.

Sutcliffe's career up to June 1984 had been checkered at best. Born on June 21, 1956 in suburban Kansas City, he was the Dodgers' #1 draft pick in the 1974 draft. After a couple of brief September callups, he was in the major leagues to stay in 1979 at age 23 -- and promptly won the Rookie of the Year award (an award that many thought was being slanted toward the Dodgers in those days, as Sutcliffe was the first of four straight LA players -- Steve Howe, Fernando Valenzuela and Steve Sax the others -- to win from 1979-82) with a fine 17-10, 3.46 season.

By the following year, he had landed in Tommy Lasorda's doghouse; injured, he went 3-9 with an alarmingly high 5.56 ERA and wound up in the Dodgers' bullpen. The next year, the 1981 strike year, wasn't much better -- he started only six games, appeared in only 8 others, and when Lasorda left him off the Dodgers' postseason roster, he went on a tirade, smashing furniture in Lasorda's office.

As you can imagine, that was his ticket out -- and in the early 1980's, there was no worse baseball Siberia than Cleveland. The Indians played in a crappy cavern of a stadium in front of small clumps of disinterested fans (well, except for the guy with the drum, who still pounds into your head at the Jake), and the Dodgers sent Jack Perconte and Sutcliffe to the Mistake by the Lake, in exchange for -- well, nothing much: Jorge Orta, Larry White and Jack Fimple.

Sutcliffe responded with a 14-8, 2.96 season that landed him fifth place in the 1982 AL Cy Young voting. Hardly anyone noticed -- the Indians finished last in the AL East and drew 1,044,021 fans, 13th of the 14 AL teams. Rick had a 17-11 year in 1983 despite a much-higher 4.29 ERA, for a 92-loss team that again finished last, in front of even fewer people -- 768,941 paid, last in the AL. It was as if he had ceased to exist, in a baseball sense.

And when he started 1984 with a 4-5, 5.15 record with awful peripheral stats (111 hits in 94.1 IP, only 58 strikeouts and a 1.66 WHIP), the Indians were only too happy to take Dallas Green's call and ship him to the north side.

Yes, it would be just about like acquiring Kris Benson in 2007.

Now, mind you, I'm not advocating that, nor would I think that Kris Benson would accomplish anything close to what Rick Sutcliffe did when he hit the mound running at Wrigley Field. Before that, he threw a 4-3 CG win against the Pirates in Pittsburgh. Five days later, the day after the famous "Sandberg Game", Sutcliffe started against the Cardinals, the crowd still buzzing from the day before's heroics.

I will never forget that game. It was as if he had been reborn, and in a baseball sense, that was absolutely true. He threw a five-hit, one-walk, fourteen-strikeout shutout, one of the most dominant games any Cub threw in the 1980's. In only one appearance, he had become a fan favorite.

His next appearance was against the Dodgers in Los Angeles. He was probably just a little too pumped to try to prove Tommy Lasorda wrong, and the Dodgers pounded him -- eight hits and seven runs in four innings. We could have been forgiven if we'd have thought the shutout was an aberration, that we were getting the lousy Sutcliffe who had stunk up the first third of the season in Cleveland.

How wrong we'd have been. That was the last game Rick Sutcliffe lost during 1984 -- well, at least in the regular season. He made seventeen more starts, and his record in them was 14-0, with three no-decisions (the Cubs were 2-1 in those games). All told, in his 20 Cub starts, he was 16-1 with a 2.69 ERA, and he won the Cy Young Award, becoming only the second pitcher in major league history to win twenty games in a season combined between two teams. The other, of course, was Hank Borowy, profiled earlier in this series, who also led the Cubs to the postseason. (Since then, Bartolo Colon has joined these two, winning ten games for both the Expos and Indians in 2002, for a similar 20-win season.) On September 3, he bettered that 14-K game with fifteen strikeouts -- in only eight innings -- at Philadelphia, though this was one of the no-decisions (the Cubs eventually won in 12).

The party continued into the playoffs, as Sutcliffe threw seven innings of five-hit shutout ball in game one of the NLCS, and hit a tremendous home run that flew right over my head onto Sheffield Avenue.

And that's where the 1984 story should end, happily, but, unfortunately, doesn't. There were endless debates about whether Jim Frey should have started Rick in game four of the NLCS, on three days' rest, and put the series away right there. He didn't, preferring to hold him back for game five. You all know what happened, and so I won't belabor the pain any further.

It should have been the beginning, as a different "Rick" said in a famous old movie saying, of a beautiful friendship. Rick Sutcliffe was 28 years old, coming off the year of his life, and signed what was then considered to be an outrageously large contract (many thought he'd leave the Cubs to play for his hometown Royals -- not as odd as that sounds now, as KC was the defending AL West champion and would go on to win the World Series in 1985) to stay, and we all figured we'd have an ace of the staff for several years to come.

It all came crashing to an end on May 19, 1985. Rick had to leave that game in Atlanta on, of all things, an injury suffered while running the bases (Eckersley was sent in to run for him). At the time he was 5-4 with a 2.32 ERA and the club was 21-13, only 2 games out of first place. He tried to come back for several starts in June, threw reasonably well but then got hurt again, as did the entire starting rotation, dooming any '85 playoff hopes. Finally, after he left a start on July 28, he was pretty much done for the year, coming back in late September when things were far past done for the ballclub.

1986 was worse -- 5-14 with an ERA north of 5, and it looked like Cleveland all over again.

But the '87 season looked a lot like '84 for Rick -- unfortunately, not for the team, as the Cubs finished last, but Andre Dawson won the MVP and Sutcliffe should have won the Cy Young Award; he was edged out by two points (57-55) by reliever Steve Bedrosian, whose sole qualification was this: "forty saves". Sutcliffe led the league in wins with 18 (until 2006, this was the lowest total for any league leader in wins in a non-strike season), had a decent 3.68 ERA (that was an aberrational hitters' year), and looked like he had recovered his '84 form.

He never really got there. He was 13-14 for the mediocre 1988 Cubs, and 16-11 for the division champions in 1989, though he wasn't even the best pitcher on the staff (both Greg Maddux and Mike Bielecki had better years). The Cubs lost his only start in the 1989 NLCS, though it wasn't his fault -- that was the famous Zimmer/Lancaster screw-up-the-count game.

And then Rick got hurt again in 1990, making only five starts. He came back briefly early in 1991 only to miss a big chunk of the middle of the season, and though he finished well (lowering a midyear 6.75 ERA to 4.10 by season's end), he was 35, and GM Larry Himes thought it best to let him go. He signed as a free agent with the Orioles -- where he proceeded to have a decent 16-15 season, a full uninjured year (36 starts), although with a high WHIP (1.37) and ERA (4.47). Two years later, after a short stint with the Cardinals, Rick retired, having won 171 games in his career, his 82 wins ranking him 26th on the Cub all-time list. He struck out 909 as a Cub, 13th most all-time.

But it's not those numbers we'll remember him for. It's those sixteen wins, propelling the Cubs into the postseason for the first time in 39 years. It's the beard that got him nicknamed "The Red Baron", the hesitation in his windup, the curling of the baseball behind the big number forty on his back (as seen in the photo at the top of this post), the memories of a championship season, and that's why he ranks as high as he does on this list.

Since retirement Rick has worked part-time for the Padres as a pitching coach in spring training and with their minor leaguers, and also as an ESPN and Padres broadcaster. In the course of doing that job last May, he appeared on the air during a Padres telecast apparently after having had too much to drink, and his giggly words wound up on YouTube (though, in searching for that to post here, it appears MLB has forced YouTube to pull the video for copyright violations -- a transcript appears here, and you can hear an audio clip (which includes some local SD sports radio commentary) here [will open a new browser window and may open Windows Media Player depending on your configuration]). He later apologized, and that incident doesn't tarnish the good on-air work Sutcliffe has done, nor the memories of the good things he brought to us in the magical season of 1984.

Rick Sutcliffe's career stats at baseball-reference.com

0 recs  |  Comment 37 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

84
I was at the clincher in Pittsburgh - drove up from DC to see the game (http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/PIT/PIT198409240.shtml). There were 5,600 people there, I would bet 5,500 were Cubs fans. Sutcliffe struck out Joe Orsulak to end the game and there was an amazing feeling.
"Don't worry, Joey. We'll go next year. They're in the World Series all the time" ---My grandfather to my sick father, October 10, 1945

by flyingdonut on Jan 12, 2007 8:41 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I was there too.
Have never heard a crowd that small make so much noise.

by Al on Jan 12, 2007 8:51 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Red Baron, indeed
I still have tape of the clincher against the Bucs, & the wild celebration in the clubhouse afterward.  It all seemed like a dream to a guy who had followed the Cubs for 25 yrs. to that point. I kept thinking MLB would come in & rule the Cubs ineligible for the playoffs or something.  (They WERE going to penalize them if they got to the Series by taking away a home game.)

by KedzieKid on Jan 12, 2007 9:01 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

That is true.
It's a myth that the Cubs lost a NLCS home date (they were due to not have home field anyway, as in those days it was rotated between divisions, and the NL East had had home field in 1983), but they would indeed have lost a home date had they won the NLCS.

I had tickets to what would have been games six and seven in Detroit. Oh, well.

by Al on Jan 12, 2007 9:03 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Tape
KedzieKid, Is it the WGN broadcast or a classic sports replay? The WGN broadcast was unprecendented. I couldn't believe the Cub post-game celebration was stayed with for so long on free tv. Nowadays that's the kind of stuff that ends up soley on cable and mlb online.

by cubby23 on Jan 15, 2007 10:17 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

awesome again al!
but a question- why would they take away a home game if they had gotten to the WS?
That's where they got that Picasso.

by WrigleyCat on Jan 12, 2007 9:12 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Because...
... the NL was scheduled that year, in the rotation, to host the weekday games, which TV wanted at night. Obviously, the Cubs without lights could not host weeknight games.

What they were going to do was have the Cubs host games 3, 4 and 5, Friday, Saturday & Sunday (this was before the change to the WS starting on a weekend, which is going to change back, BTW, starting this fall), and game three was to have started at 2:45 pm Chicago time, in order to get some of it into late afternoon on the East Coast.

That would have been interesting. That game would have been played on October 12. Sunset on October 12 is 6:10 pm. They'd have played the last couple of innings in twilight, if it had been a long game.

As it turned out, and I will never forget this, it rained all day that day. Hard. It would have been rained out.

by Al on Jan 12, 2007 9:21 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

When he came to the Cubs
Sutcliffe had an infected tooth.  He blamed his bad start on that.  A Chicago dentist took care of it, and that was partly credited for his turnaround.  

I wondered why there were no competent dentists in Cleveland.  Had there been, the Cubs wouldn't have won in 84 :-)

by Clark Addison on Jan 12, 2007 9:15 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

It's possible that Sutcliffe,,,
like most of us, avoided going to the Dentist until it was unbearable...Right place, right time for that deal...That other guy from the 30s should be ranked ahead of Sut., but it was a magical season.  One thing I remember most, oddly enough, was Harry bemoaning how long it took Sut. to get pitches off when he was pitching with an injury, was that 85 or 86 or every year after 84?  I can't remember anymore.  

by DudeVf11 on Jan 12, 2007 9:14 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

'84 was a fun year to be a young Cub's fan
and a year that helped seat them forever as 'my team.' Rick Sutcliffe was a huge part of that (along with Sandberg, Durham and Moreland).

'03 and '04 remind me so much of the energy and resulting heartaches of the '84 and '85 Cubs.

1989 was another great year for him and also when I began to hate the Giants.

At least we didn't sign Batista...

by stelmodad on Jan 12, 2007 9:33 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Was at the game after "The Game," too.
... as a teenager.

My strong Cub fandom definitely dates from '84; in fact, you might be able to mark it to this game.

1984 had the joy of the unexpected (before the horror in San Diego, I mean). In the world of high salaries and high expectations, will we get to enjoy its like again?

by mlf on Jan 12, 2007 9:38 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

2003 was like that, too.
I don't think anyone expected that sort of year, coming off the disaster of 2002.

Now, if the Cubs do anything in 2007, it will feel that way too, given the awful year of 2006.

by Al on Jan 12, 2007 9:40 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Think so?
Given all they've spent? I think 2003 has permanently raised expectations for the franchise. They won't be allowed to be "Lovable Losers" again anytime soon.

I realize you had to watch the 2006 disaster unfold with your own eyes, while I mostly read the box scores with dismay.

by mlf on Jan 12, 2007 9:48 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Well...
... I see your point; you're right about the higher expectations. Let's hope they come to fruition soon.

by Al on Jan 12, 2007 9:50 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah... that's the way I have felt...
2003 was unreal. Out of nowhere. And with the stud young arms. No big name FA's. Kerry Wood was still unfulfilled potential. Mark Prior was still too young.

Anyway, with all the money spent, although I don't think anyone will be surprised if the Cubs are average or even slightly worse than that, but at the same time, I don't think anyone will be surprised if they win 88-90 games.

IMO, the only way this year can match 2003, either, the Cubs start hot and are on a 100 win pace all year and actually come close to it, they have injuries and tank to start the year, but young guys not expected to contribute (Theriot, Pagan, Guzman, Mateo, etc.) keep them in 1st or 2nd for the majority of the year, or one of the guys (DLee, Soriano, ARam, Zambrano, Prior, Hill) has a monster year and the team makes a huge run like the 2002 Oakland A's.

If they remain around .500, basically performing to expectations, I don't think I'll get all that excited until September.

But that's just me.

EINSTEIN!

by tyger1147 on Jan 12, 2007 11:09 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh...
also if they are around .500 and trade for someone like Michael Young or Miguel Tejada.
EINSTEIN!

by tyger1147 on Jan 12, 2007 11:11 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yup, 2003 and...
the Red Sox, White Sox, and Cards (and to a lesser degree the expansion Marlins) winning the WS all contribute as well...And this year the Cubs need to turn their TV ratings around v. Sox...Unfortuntaely I think Kenny Williams is probably correct in his quote from the January 11 Tribune regarding the approach to building a quality and affordable pitching staff:

"I'd rather take a [young] guy with a high ceiling than take a guy who I had to overpay to make it look like I'm trying," Williams said.

Hendry had to spend wildly to improve the team or give the appearance of improvement.  But at the same time, I don't expect a whole lot from Lily or Marquis.  In fact, with painful expereince at MLB level in 2006, it's possible we have Lily and Marquis in-house and far cheaper.  extremely expensive insurance, but hendry is not developing much since W, P and Z and appears to have little confidence in what's there.

by DudeVf11 on Jan 12, 2007 9:21 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Another nick name
Our cubs group called him Sweatcliffe because he took so long between pitches; on a hot day he would make you sweat all afternoon waiting because his games were of the four hour type.

My favorite game to see "Sweatcliffe" pitch was Labor Day weekend (if my memory serves correctly) in '84. Cold, drizzle, windy and the Cubs hosted the Cardinals, with a half game lead. Stay in first or fall to second. It was so cold and crappy and the game seemed like a stall tactic for Rick. Cubs win, don't remember the score. But that was as close as the Cardinals got. I think it was the Saturday game of the week on national TV also. What a magical pick up he was. Let's hope for that magic from another one of our pitchers this year.

Spendry!!!

by mrcubsfan on Jan 12, 2007 11:32 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I think you're...
mixing up your years.  I think the game you're referring to was in '89 - the "Dwight Smith mad dash" game where Smith stretched a single into a double (well, actually an error on RF Brunansky) that led to the tying run in the 8th.  The Cubs eventually won that game in extra innings.  It was on 9/9/89.  I remember that game being on a rainy Saturday and the Cardinals had won the day before to move within a half game of first.  Midseason pickup Luis Salazar had two big hits in that game.

Here's the link: http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/CHN/CHN198909090.shtml

by Tarzan Joe on Jan 12, 2007 11:46 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Too Funny
I think of Rick S. and I think of my Grandfather complaining about how slow he was ... memories... its what this game is all about.

by NashvilleBlue on Jan 12, 2007 7:23 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

He had a great sense of humor
Sutcliffe was a notorious prankster with a great sense of humor
In many ways Maddux who has that reputation now learned
from the master. When Maddux came up he looked INSANELY
young. On an  road trip in 87  after the Cubs arrived at the park for practice . Sutcliff conspired to have Maddux left alone in the dugout. Sutcliffe then went over to one of the opposing teams grounds crew and asked them to go over and  tell their "bat boy" that he was not allowed in the dug out before the game, which the guy did to a very flustered Maddux. To this day, Sutcliff will often refer to Maddux as the "bat boy".

I also remember some of his teammates getting a small dose
of revenge by buying a billboard on the Kennedy express
way and putting up a huge photo of smilling Sutcliffe that
read
RICK SUTCLIFFE WELCOMES YOU TO CHICAGO
and underneath HIS HOME PHONE  #

I love the ballpark. I love the city. I love the fans. Aside from how we've played this year, there's nothing not to like about Chicago." Greg Maddux 7/29/06

by jessica on Jan 12, 2007 12:30 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

I'd forgotten about that
Thanks for the memory!
"Eighty-five percent of the $#@&$ world's working! The other 15 come out here! A %&$&# playground for the $&&*@!"

by danimal15 on Jan 17, 2007 7:56 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

84 NLCS rotation Frey screwed it up
Will always think, with way things turned out, that then mgr. Frey made error by using 4 starters instead of 3 for 5-game series vs. Pods.

Should have found way to make sure "Sut'' and Trout got 2 starts apiece; starting Eck and Sanderson in 3&4 opened the floodgates for the disaster of game 5, altho not Sut's fault.

Trout was pitching as well or better than Sut at end of '84 and could have gone in a game 5 if necess. after Sut returned in game 4...read in a recent book (Fred Mitchell's Where are they Now?) Frey defending his rotation saying Trout was not all that dependable.

That team surely the best of modern era Cubs with 93 closeby and would have given Detroit more of a tussle than SD did in WS...it's the matchup all of America wanted to see.

by writerinwrigley on Jan 12, 2007 11:13 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Trout did pitch...
Again for part of an inning in Game 5 - no runs, no hits.

The Game when Durham made TWO errors allowing the floodgates to open for 4 big ones in the 7th.

But he is one of the "100 Greatest Cubs" according to Al.

Oy! What a franchise.

Cardinals make me see Red!

by TheEman on Jan 13, 2007 8:44 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Favorite Sutcliffe & Playoff Memory...
I went down to the old Piano Man bar on Clark where I was gonna watch Game 1 of the 1984 NLCS if I couldn't find a ticket.

After sitting at the bar for 10 minutes, a Chicago Cop, in uniform comes in (apparently he knew the owner) and asked if anyone was looking for a ticket to the game.

I said, "How much?" "Forty bucks", the Cop said.

"Done."

So I sat somewhere in the terrace reserved and saw a really fun game, made even more so when "Sut" hit one out of the park en route to a 13-0 win! He gave up 5 hits and was brilliant against Eric Show.

There was discussion that at the time if the Cubs had lights, we would have gotten the three games due to the better record.

But I seem to recall that the 2-3 sequence was just how it was done then.

Cardinals make me see Red!

by TheEman on Jan 12, 2007 11:27 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

That's correct...
... as noted above, the home game lost would have been in the World Series. The NLCS was just scheduled that way -- in those days, the divisions rotated home field advantage, and the NL East had had the home field in 1983, so it was the West's turn.

by Al on Jan 13, 2007 4:05 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Big Red
Does anyone else think of Sut when they see that SNL takeoff commercial for Big Red?

Rick is one of my 3 all time favorite Cubs.

And boy could he hit.  I remember a game in the late 80s when he hit a homerun as a pinch hitter in the 12th inning.

Sadly injuries affected what could otherwise possibly have been a HOF career.  He never was the same after he came back too soon in 85 off that injury.

And he's a terrific guy off the field.  

He and Kerry Wood are a lot alike in many aspects.  The saddest thing they have in common is injury proneness.

2007 THE YEAR OF THE BEAR. Big ones in February. Cubby Bears in October. Throw in the year of the Bull in June.

by kerrysotherwife on Jan 12, 2007 11:40 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Sutcliffe memory
I have a fond memory of Sutcliffe, I rember being a freshmen at Southern Illiniois University and driving all the way to Pittsburgh from Carbondale to see them clinch. We drove for what seemed like forever but it was well worth it. One of my favorite Cubs players.

by ivysdad23 on Jan 13, 2007 12:16 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

sutcliffe
visited my sister when she was in the children's hospital with leukemia. very nice guy.
DEJESUS!!!

by tomas21 on Jan 13, 2007 2:18 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

One of the great Sutcliffe stories
I remembered this one but thanks to the marvels of
google I got the official Mark Grace version of it which
is much better than my memory ( Plus I only heard the
PG version ). This was Grace's response to  a question about
the funniest on field incident he could remember.

One day Rick Sutcliffe gave up back-to-back home runs in Cincinnati. And in Cincinnati, they shoot off fireworks after a Red hits a home run. And Sutcliffe was pretty intense on the day he pitched. So Eric Davis takes him deep and Paul O'Neill takes him deep right after that. So Sutcliffe is all pissed off, and Billy Connors comes out to the mound and Sutcliffe yells at him, "I know I gave up f---ing back-to-back home runs and get your f---ing ass back in the dugout and tell Zimmer to f---ing settle down there, too."

Billy looks at him and says, "I know you have everything under control, Rick. I just wanted to give that guy running the fireworks a little time to reload." I

I love the ballpark. I love the city. I love the fans. Aside from how we've played this year, there's nothing not to like about Chicago." Greg Maddux 7/29/06

by jessica on Jan 13, 2007 3:05 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Great story, but...
... it never happened.

Here is Sutcliffe's complete game log.

He allowed 2 HR in a game to the Reds only once, and it wasn't to Davis and O'Neill, and it wasn't back-to-back.

Grace loves to tell stories. Wish they were true.

by Al on Jan 13, 2007 3:49 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

spoil sport
Funny I did think it was true because I thought
Conners told it too. Frankly seems almost too elaberate
for Grace to make up. He is more creative than I would have
thought.
I love the ballpark. I love the city. I love the fans. Aside from how we've played this year, there's nothing not to like about Chicago." Greg Maddux 7/29/06

by jessica on Jan 13, 2007 4:26 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Funny you should look that up and note this Al.
Roger Angell did an excellent speaking engagement on the mystery of memory and specifically baseball memory. How certain details remain vivid and clear while others fade and take on a life of their own. It's on the web somewhere, available to be watched with a real audio player (it also has a few nice stories about Willie Mays and "the catch," as well as Dusty Baker, and his somewhat sketchy memory of his at-bat after Hank Aaron's magical 715 HR).

by cubby23 on Jan 15, 2007 10:25 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Big game pitcher in '84
A lot like Kerry Wood in '03, there wasn't another pitcher I'd rather see on the mound for the Cubs during that '84 season than Rick Sutcliffe. He was so on the money during that second half. I'll never forget his dejected face after coming out of game 5 in San Diego, nor will I forget the look on his equally dejected face in '89 at Candelstick after Sandberg grounded to Robby Thompson and he tossed the ball to Will Clark to wrap up the series. Sutcliffe was sitting on the bench staring off into space.

The fact that he was willing to give up some of his salary so that Dallas Green would sign Andre Dawson in 1987 said it all for me. He's a Cub HOF forever!

by cubby23 on Jan 16, 2007 12:05 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Hard to imagine
that happening today. Will Soriano give up some of his millions so the Cubs can sign Zambrano? Not a chance. After all, you need enough money to buy 50 houses and 3 jet planes. Giving up one of those houses and a jet plane just so your team might have a chance to win? Forget about it!
"Eighty-five percent of the $#@&$ world's working! The other 15 come out here! A %&$&# playground for the $&&*@!"

by danimal15 on Jan 17, 2007 7:59 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Not in baseball, but...
... I read the other day that Brian Urlacher spoke of restructuring his contract so the Bears could keep Lance Briggs.

by Al on Jan 19, 2007 8:27 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Good to hear
Besides the paternity suit, it seems like Urlacher is a pretty good guy.
"Eighty-five percent of the $#@&$ world's working! The other 15 come out here! A %&$&# playground for the $&&*@!"

by danimal15 on Jan 19, 2007 11:36 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon
Start posting about the Cubs »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Sb_small
Ask BCB - Wacky Trade Proposals
Small
Reversal of opinion...Bradley will not be moved
Yelloncard_small
Baseball Picture Puzzles Overflow 1
Derrick_rose_poster_by_rokasm_small
You know you want him, Get it done Jim!
Yelloncard_small
Baseball Player Picture Puzzles

Recent FanPosts

Small
Time to get yelled at...
Cubs_small
Cubs HR Over/Under
Cubs_ying_yang_small
OT Aged Stadiums
Small
Here's a thought
Jake_fox_small
25th Annual Cubs Convention
Bucky_small
OT: Annual Thanksgiving  Thread
Dscn2381_small
Cubs 2010 2B and "the L word"
Cubswin712_small
Is there anyway we trade some of our high-priced players?
Yelloncard_small
Milton Bradley Named NL "LVP" By Joe Posnanski

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Would you blow up the farm system for Halladay?
FanGraphs calls Grabow a "waste of cash."
Fangraphs hasn't given up on Geo, should you?
Baseball America's Top 10 Cubs Prospects
An animated tribute to the no-hitter that Pirates pitcher Dock Ellis threw on June 12, 1970. Simply...

Recent FanShots

Mike Kiley insults Wrigley and Cubs fans
Muskat on Fuld : even DUMBER than usual
Free Agency Blunders
"I Want Mark DeRosa"
White Sox Sign Vizquel To One-Year Deal
Cubs' next major hire: marketing guru
Zambrano attends Bears game
Cubs install sign boards in bleachers to block Horseshoe Casino (Budweiser) building...
This one is for you sabermetricians
A Chicagoan, Part Of Cardinals Ownership Group, Dies

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

It Is Only...

Cubs By The Numbers

Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.

Click here to order your copy, available now!

SPONSORS

Recent Stories in Ticket Exchanges

Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: Cubs Convention 2010
Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: General 2009 Ticket Exchange
Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: September 29-October 4 Homestand

Managing Editor

Yelloncard_small Al

Editorial Cartoonist

Toonmike_small toonmike

Contributors

Dsc_0139_small holy mackerel

100px-boisehawkscaplogo_small Josh77

Small shawndgoldman