A Shameful Plug for Roger Federer and The Australian Open
I'm looking at the Home page of "Bleed Cubbie Blue". It tells me there are 53 more days until spring training and 85 days until Opening Day, 2007. But, if I look at AustralianOpen.Com, it tells me there are just 8 days until the Tennis Season starts again.
I know, I know, this is a Baseball Blog. But if you are bored, and want to see some sports action, why not consider turning on the Australian Open and watch some tennis. It starts on Monday, January l5th and runs for two weeks.
There's a guy out there named Roger Federer who is on pace to become the BEST tennis player ever.
Let me give you some perspective on this player.
He's only 25 years old and has won 44 Singles Titles, 9 of them are Slams. (Slams are played on four surfaces: rebound ace, clay, grass and hard courts) Last year, he was one victory short of winning the Grand Slam which means all four Slams. A guy named Rafael Nadal got in his way at the French Open, but that's another story.
Every time he steps onto the court these days, he is making history. He's the first player since l960-61 to reach 6 straight grand slam finals. He's the first player to win Wimbledon and the US Open three consecutive years.
In 2007 he will break the record for the most consecutive weeks at #1, 161. He will have the longest winning streak on hard courts, 56(2005-2006 season), longest consecutive winning season on grass, 48 (2003-present) and has won the most consecutive singles titles, 24 (2003-2005 season).
The only surface he has struggled on has been the Clay at Roland Garros (French Open) going down twice to Rafael Nadal, (last year he played in the finals) a clay court specialist. But even Nadal will tell you that Roger is the best on "every" surface.
His first title came in 2003 when he won Wimbledon. He got down on his knees and cried. He has since won three more Wimbledon titles. His home country, Switzerland, gave him a cow after he won the first title but I'm not sure he cried then.
In 2006, his best year to date, he won $8,343,885 and his total lifetime winnings are: $28,576,458. Of course a tennis players salary is determined each year by "performance"... what a concept.
Right now, Roger is just five slams away from Sampras's old record. Most tennis people tell you that Federer will break that record, it's just a matter of time.
So, if you do choose to watch Federer, you might say, "what's the big deal" and that would be because he makes it look so damn easy. He hits shots that you would never even think possible. He hits with power but also has the fine and delicate touch of an artist. His serves do not overpower you, but he's the kind of guy you would like playing for you in a clutch situation. His second server percentage (you only get two serves) is 59% and he wins 69% of break points. That's like having your pitch hitter going out there and getting a hit 70% of the time in a clutch situation. It just doesn't get a whole lot better than that.
So, if you have the chance and the inclination, watch this guy play, you won't be disappointed and you will see tennis history being made.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
0 recs |
10 comments
|
Comments
And he's a nice guy
Professional tennis is a game that excludes people and there really isn't much comraderie between players on the tour. Since there aren't teams (except in Davis Cup), players see each other as rivals only. Yet Federer is known as a player who will work with other guys and give them advice about things they can do to improve their game. He's not doing it to be holier-than-thou, but he's simply a student of the game and plays at a level that nobody ever has before.
The one criticism I'd make to your post above is that Pete Sampras currently holds the record for Grand Slam titles won; it isn't an "old" record until somebody breaks it.
Roger Federer
In fact, the last article I read about him in Tennis magazine started out with: "The problem with Roger Federer is that he's just too nice...."
Federer
It's like deja`vu all over again ....
should have been
Although I usually cheer for Nadal when the two play each other because he's the underdog. I mean, I am a Cubs fan after all.
Nice write up
wow
by dat cubfan daver on Jan 8, 2007 12:34 PM CST reply actions
re: LMAO!!!
by dat cubfan daver on Jan 8, 2007 1:54 PM CST up reply actions
When the Open "Really" Starts
Federer
It's like deja`vu all over again ....
Best Tennis Match I've Ever Watched...
by SiValleyCubFan on Jan 8, 2007 10:31 PM CST up reply actions

by 



















