2008 & 09 Prospects?
What prospects do you expect to make the team in 2008 & 2009, and who will be the biggest contributors???
Soto ~ It appears he has the catching job for 08.
Pie ~ Lots of expectations, but I won't be shocked if they go out and sign Aaron Rowand and try to trade Pie for pitching.
Tyler Colvin ~ Seems they're very high on him. Could he be starting in 2009??
Gallagher and Hart ~ They seem like the two most likely to fight it out with Marshall for the #5 spot.
Eric Patterson ~ Doesn't seem like the Cubs are high on him.
Cedeno ~ I have a feeling that he'll edge out Fontenot in spring training.. Theriot probably starts over him.
Any other notable prospects??
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
0 recs |
65 comments
Comments
You could be right, but much depends
by N Oakley on Oct 11, 2007 1:06 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Eric Patterson...
by Al on Oct 11, 2007 1:10 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Eric Patterson...
by John Q Freejazz on Oct 11, 2007 1:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd also like to hear more evidence...
by SouthernCub on Oct 12, 2007 12:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Forget the attitude problem...
by Damen Jackson on Oct 11, 2007 2:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Al:
Even still, you use these reports in lieu of actually providing any meaningful baseball insight into the discussion. Dismissing a player due to a possible weakness of character without paying any mind to actual skill neglects our purpose for discussing anything at all.
As it happens, I agree that Patterson should be trade bait (or rather should have been traded about 11 months ago when his value was highest. I advocated trading him then (I've really never been an Eric Patterson fan. His tools aside (in this case, "tools" might mean little more than 'speed'), he's probably too weak defensively to ever stick at second base, and hence his value diminishes significantly if we have to move him to CF (both because offense is more premium at second base, and because we already have 2 better CF prospects in our system in Pie and Colvin...although Colvin may move to right, but I've digressed from the point).
And now we can include several other factors that hurt Patterson's prospect status: he doesn't have his brother's power, he's been slightly old for most of his minor league stops, and has never exactly 'torn it up'. He's been solid, and has a decent shot of one day being a relatively high average CF (more of a longshot for 2b) who strikes out frequently, and bats around .270-.290 with an unimpressive, but not terrible, OBP. This is his upside, but I think his likely outcome is bench player.
Finally, Patterson is allegedly a head case, so I guess we should probably take that into account too.
by Thelonious on Oct 11, 2007 11:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Colvin
by cubfaninSTL on Oct 11, 2007 1:12 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
i think
by kylejo on Oct 11, 2007 6:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Addendum
I'd love to see Hendry go after Jake Peavy, who I think is more likely to be available than Santana. SD's not spending money, and Tower's a major wheeler/dealer, who has dealt with Hendry in the past.
Peavy's at his peak trade value, as he's under team control for two more years, and SD could use a 2b, CF, and a couple cheap starters. Patterson, Pie, Hill and Marshall could fill some needs.
by CubFaninCA on Oct 11, 2007 1:49 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
peavy's mechanics frighten me
by Thelonious on Oct 11, 2007 11:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Large trade
by Hammer on Oct 11, 2007 2:23 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
SD's budget is $55 million and
by CubFaninCA on Oct 11, 2007 2:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
San Diego's team
If he was a FA after 08, it might make more sense, but not now.
by MPH73 on Oct 11, 2007 2:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ok
by MPH73 on Oct 11, 2007 3:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
They do.
Now's the time to trade him. Teams are going to be more reluctant to trade for him with only 1 year left, as he could go elsewhere. Also, he's coming off a great, injury-free season.
I just can't see SD paying Peavy $20 million a year considering their current budget.
by CubFaninCA on Oct 11, 2007 3:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Peavy contract link.
by CubFaninCA on Oct 11, 2007 3:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
this is accurate
by DartmouthCubsFan on Oct 11, 2007 3:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks
by MPH73 on Oct 11, 2007 3:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No doubt and
by CubFaninCA on Oct 11, 2007 3:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If the Padres
Having said that, they'd want a mint for him. Pie, Marmol and Hill might do it, but then we'd have to break open the bank for Peavy to sign him--and he'll want more than Zambrano.
I think we'd be better off not making that trade.
by Josh77 on Oct 11, 2007 2:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree...
By the way, is Cameron out the door, or what?
by Damen Jackson on Oct 11, 2007 3:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Response
Pie should be given the opportunity to take the CF job in spring training. I still believe he's a potential all-star out there. We do need a backup plan in case Pie flames out though, and that's why we really shouldn't trade Jones.
Tyler Colvin is one weird prospect. With one exception, he does everything well and nothing great. He has good speed, but not great. He hits for a good average, but not likely to win a batting title. He's got doubles power right now. Sometimes that translates into home run power as players get stronger and older, but Colvin's level swing may prevent that from happening. His defense is good, but possibly not good enough to stay in center field.
The one thing he isn't good at is controlling the strike zone. He's terrible there. He rarely walks and strikes out at a Soriano-esque rate. I keep coming back to Jeff Francoeur on Colvin. I pretty much think that's his upside.
You're forgetting the pitchers, actually. Billy Petrick is someone we got a brief look at and whom I betting goes north with the team in April. Rocky Roquet has future closer-stuff (although so does Marmol, of course) and we've discussed Jose Ceda around here. Kevin Hart seems to be a Lou Piniella favorite--I wouldn't be shocked if he ended up in the starting rotation next season. And Jeff Samardzija is probably a 2009 arrival. I'm bucking the sabermetric crowd on this one and saying that the Shark is going to be a good one.
by Josh77 on Oct 11, 2007 2:55 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Colvin
by DartmouthCubsFan on Oct 11, 2007 2:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Colvin has several comps
Pie has substantially more upside than that. He deserves to win the CF job full-time (or at least against RH pitching) in Spring Training.
by zambranofan on Oct 11, 2007 3:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow
The thing is though, Hisle walked 50-60 times a year. If Colvin does that, he's a better player that I'm thinking.
by Josh77 on Oct 11, 2007 3:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know if...
by cwyers on Oct 11, 2007 7:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh definitely
I think he's raw and I think his bad numbers in Daytona were a result of him working on off-speed stuff that he never threw in college. Hard to miss many bats when the batter can sit on a change or a slider, because those are the pitches that Samardzija needed to practice on.
I still don't know if he's a starter or a reliever though.
by Josh77 on Oct 11, 2007 7:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
When a guy's on the fence...
For the larger point -- I really don't trust a lot of minor league pitching stats below the AA level anyway, because the quality of fielding is so haphazard. With guys like Samardzija, where scouting reports are, if not plentiful, readily available over a decent cross-section of time, it's probably best to listen to the scouts unless they're actively contradicting what the perhipials say.
by cwyers on Oct 12, 2007 12:01 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good point
If a guy in the FSL is striking out a lot of people but has a high ERA because of batting average on balls in play, that's one thing. But Samardzija simply wasn't striking people out.
But as I said, I think it was an issue of him working on his secondary and tertiary pitches because of his raw inexperience. I think he has the tools and the drive to make everything click eventually--and strike batters out.
by Josh77 on Oct 12, 2007 2:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You are right
by rlpete on Oct 12, 2007 12:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you werent kidding
too bad kyler burke kind of tailed off.
by kylejo on Oct 12, 2007 8:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm worried though
Has he been moved there for next season? Or is this just some screwup at MiLB?
by Josh77 on Oct 12, 2007 12:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Colvin and Pie
I agree on not giving up on Pie. He is the same age as Colvin.
by JonH on Oct 13, 2007 9:39 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pie has more raw physical skills
the one unique thing about baseball, is we have seen tons of non-athletic type of guys turn out to be some of the best pure hitters and some of the best pure athletes look putrid at the plate.
Having the concentration/mental ability to consistently put the fat part of the bat on the ball, is very much independent of raw physical skills.
by MPH73 on Oct 13, 2007 12:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Colvin's hitting mentality?
That's not meant to disparage Colvin. But Pie has shown a lot more of a hitter's mentality in the minors than Colvin has to this point, if you ask me.
by SouthernCub on Oct 13, 2007 3:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Shawn Green
I think Franceour is still a better comp.
by Josh77 on Oct 13, 2007 12:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We're all forgetting...
by jgn17 on Oct 11, 2007 4:16 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Let me add a few position players
Hoffpauir. .319/.365/.552 with Iowa. He was injured the last 2 months and will be ready to start 2008. The downside is he will be 28 and only plays 1B. On a positive note, he's outstanding defensively, hits from the left side and has a good measure of the strike zone. He may well have been the MVP for Iowa last year without the injury.
Kroeger. .382/.449/.609 at Tenn. .263/.338/.474 at Iowa but was injured off and on. Once a highly regarded draftee with Az, he seemed to have resurrected his career with the Cubs. Bats LH and has excellent power and plays RF. While the injury last year might delay his possibility in 2008, I'm a big fan of his and, if his numbers at Tenn are nearly attainable at Iowa in 08, he's a good prospect for RF in 09.
Spears. Started at Daytona and advanced to Tenn midseason where his numbers jumped. .273/.358/.383 for the season. He's only 22 and his power numbers increased when moved up. But 2B is a deep position for us so he'll have a struggle to pass the competition. Good plate discipline and he bats LH.
Dopirak. Will he or won't he, that is the question. He seems very streaky. He's only 23 and has awesome power. However, he seems locked into 1B and has a poor BB/K rate. He started at AA and moved back to Daytona after a poor start and 21 games. Pre break .206/.233/.402. Post break .304/.359/.524. He'll need to play a strong season at AA to revive his status as a possible prospect but he has great tools.
Clevinger .340/.378/.441 at Boise and Daytona. He's a LH catcher with low power numbers. Only 247 AB last year but a 17/11 BB/K numbers. Probably wouldn't project until 2010 but keep an eye on him.
Donaldson 1B/C One of my favorites. Soigned this year out of Auburn as a C. .335/.460/.590. Only 173 AB but has excellent power and a 37/34 BB/K rate. Only 21 and a RH batter. His OBP and power are outstanding. Keep a close eye on his progress next year.
Thomas drafted out of FSU and quite possibly the future 2B of the Cubs. Just turn 21 and went .308/.404/.544 at Boise in 182 AB. Stole 28/30 bases in 46 games. Decent power for a 2B and could project as our future leadoff man.
by tharr on Oct 11, 2007 5:22 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
we could really use
by kylejo on Oct 11, 2007 6:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kroeger is not on the 40-man roster...
by cwyers on Oct 11, 2007 7:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Considering that
by tharr on Oct 11, 2007 8:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It should be noted...
by cwyers on Oct 11, 2007 7:03 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
When should Samardzija be ready?
by sanantonecub on Oct 12, 2007 7:42 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
It's hard to say.
Because of his significant comittment to football in college, he's kind of a tweener -- more upside than most college players, but more risk/development time, too. It's an odd case, and I really don't know what to say here.
That said -- as a bullpen guy I think he might be ready as soon as August/September.
by cwyers on Oct 12, 2007 9:41 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I assume...
by Al on Oct 12, 2007 1:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I really can't say.
But you're absolutely right -- he will pitch in major-league spring training, and that'll give the club some idea of where they want him to go.
by cwyers on Oct 12, 2007 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i like hearing about prospects
by dogcatratcheese on Oct 12, 2007 9:10 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Ty Wright
by tonye8300 on Oct 12, 2007 2:36 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Wright
His upside? I haven't exactly heard. But he was drafted in the seventh round after his senior season in college. If he was someone people thought had a high upside, he would have gone earlier and/or after his junior season.
I wouldn't put him on my list of top-20 Cub prospects. Well, maybe down near #20.
by Josh77 on Oct 12, 2007 2:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
some love for Mitch Atkins too
by PrincetonCubs on Oct 12, 2007 5:41 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Earl and Ty
Any ETA on Earl Cunningham or Ty Griffin?
by Ghost of Fred Merkle on Oct 12, 2007 7:51 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Oh you're so clever
by Josh77 on Oct 12, 2007 11:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I remember
Funny no mention of Ryan Harvey, wow what a bad pick I guess.
by Johnny Callison was a Cub on Oct 13, 2007 12:21 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ty Griffin...
Dumb, dumb, dumb. As good a player as Ventura was, he could have been even better with Wrigley Field as his home park.
by Al on Oct 13, 2007 9:47 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe
Pick #13 was Manny Ramirez. #14 was Cliff Floyd. #15 was a Brewer pitching bust, but #16 was Shawn Green.
You're probably right about Griffin because Glanville had a long major league career whereas Griffin didn't, but if you want to go missed opportunities, missing out on three quality outfielders with one Hall of Famer and getting the mediocre one ranks right up there.
by Josh77 on Oct 13, 2007 12:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You could probably do that....
Earl Cunningham was just about as bad a pick as Griffin, but I don't have a list of who was taken right after him handy.
by Al on Oct 13, 2007 1:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually
http://www.thebaseballcube.com/draft/1989/Round-1-1.shtml
That was a terrible first round. Ben McDonald as #1. Tyler Houston #2. Roger Salkeld #3. Frank Thomas was #7 (The only quality player gone one pick before us) The only real quality players were passed on were Chuck Knoblauch, Mo Vaughn and Todd Jones, and they were all taken in the 20s, so a lot of teams passed on them.
The baseball cube has a complete list of the amateur draft now. I've found some errors in the later rounds, but all the first rounds seem correct.
by Josh77 on Oct 13, 2007 2:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Changed my mind
A pox upon Jim Frey and the way he destroyed Gordon Goldsberry's farm system. I am still convinced that had Dallas Green not been fired, we would have won a World Series sometime from 1989 to 1993.
by Josh77 on Oct 13, 2007 2:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
In the four years
His final draft, 1991, actually wasn't that bad, netting Doug Glanville, Terry Adams and Steve Trachsel. (Jon Lieber was also drafted, but didn't sign.) But as I pointed out, that was a loaded draft and I think every team drafting that year got someone good.
I HATE JIM FREY!
by Josh77 on Oct 13, 2007 2:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Harvey
It was a bad pick in a bad draft, unless you picked 1-2 and got Delmon Young or Rickie Weeks. And since it was the usually incompetent Orioles who grabbed Markakis, I'm willing to bet that pick was more luck that good scouting.
I'm willing to give the Cubs a pass on Harvey because 2003 is shaping out to be one of the worst draft classes on record.
by Josh77 on Oct 13, 2007 12:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 




















