BlogWorldExpo Recap
From Wednesday through yesterday, I was in Las Vegas, mostly to attend BlogWorldExpo, billed as the first convention of its kind, and partly to just have some fun in Vegas, since I hadn't been there since 1999. (Fortunately, I got out of there without losing any money -- I won some playing blackjack the first night, then gave most of it back the second night. Oh, well.)
It was nice to finally meet, face to face, a number of SB Nation bloggers who I've emailed many, many times in the nearly three years (which is an eternity in blogtime) I've been part of this group: Adam from Lone Star Ball (and you'll get a kick out of his experience at a blackjack table at Caesar's Palace); Larry of Viva El Birdos; Brandon of Acme Packing Company, who is a good guy even though he's a Packers fan; Steve of Clips Nation; Jim from the USC blog Conquest Chronicles, and Dex from the Padres site Gaslamp Ball, who sat next to me at one of the sessions on Thursday, snapped a photo of me taking notes on my laptop, and said of me in that post: "Al's older than me, but he also looks a little more dangerous, which is why I haven't mentioned anything about 1984."
Hmmm. I only look a little more dangerous? I have to work on that. (But he was probably smart anyway to not mention 1984.)
There were also two SBN bloggers who I'd met before -- Matt from the Chicago Bulls site Blog-a-Bull, who told me he's a huge Cubs fan and originally wanted to start a Cubs blog, but since there were already so many, he figured the Bulls were the next best thing, and Our Fearless Leader Tyler Bleszinski from Athletics Nation. I'd be remiss if I didn't say here and now -- hey Blez, thanks for lunch on Friday!
In addition to the SBN folks, I was fortunate to be able to meet and hang out with ESPN.com's Rob Neyer, whose online columns and books I have enjoyed for many years (and who, we all learned, doesn't have a college degree); Matthew Cerrone, whose MetsBlog is incredibly well-researched and comprehensive (I was really impressed with how thorough and knowledgeable Matt is); Jamie Mottram, who used to run FanHouse for AOL and is now charged with starting a similar project at Yahoo (and who also, with his brother Chris, runs the very funny and well-written Mister Irrelevant blog; and Chris Ballard from SI.com.
We all shared thoughts on quite a number of topics relating to sports blogging and blogging in general (there were an estimated 1200 bloggers in attendance); you can read some of the things that were discussed here, here, and here; thanks to my SBN colleagues for blogging, and especially to Jim from Conquest Chronicles, live-blogging, the events, while I was busily taking notes.
Friday afternoon, after the sessions were over, nearly everyone in attendance squeezed into a too-small room (so small that when there weren't enough seats, so that people were standing in the back, they enlisted some convention center employees to open the movable walls to the next room over) to hear Mark Cuban deliver the "ending keynote" (that phrase is a bit of an oxymoron, isn't it? Isn't a "keynote speech" supposed to start a convention?).
Cuban was introduced as a man who has a number of different enterprises under his hat -- but also as a blogger, "one of us". I'm sure many of you have read his blog, BlogMaverick; I find it refreshing, because it indeed does do just what many bloggers do -- talk about what's going on in his own life, as well as about some of his ventures. Just because Cuban's life happens to include "Dancing With The Stars" doesn't mean he can't be a human being, too.
Cuban said that he started blogging in 2004 when he did an email interview with a Dallas Morning News reporter, and then when he saw the interview published, it turned out to be something completely different than what he had said in his email responses; he decided to post the exact email exchange to tell people what "really" happened. (If I have searched his site correctly, this is the relevant post.) About blogging, he made the following very insightful comments:
About personal blogging: sometimes something just crosses your mind, and you think, "I want to blog about that". If it’s personal it doesn’t matter, but if you’re working for someone and trying to build a brand, you have a challenge in staying true to yourself. Fight the temptation to pander to readers.
After the Q&A session a number of us crowded around him to try to get a word in before he had to go. I introduced myself and handed him a BCB card and he said, "I read your site." I asked him if I could interview him for the site; he directed me to a website where I could find an email address for him. I emailed him Friday evening and had a response within six hours (clearly, from his cellphone, I copy/paste his reply here in its entirety):
So Mark -- if you really are reading this site, I'll ask you again, if you feel you can: tell us directly. As I said in my email to you, BCB has a large number of the most passionate, knowledgeable and in-touch Cubs fans. You already know the power of blogs, since you have your own. You can email me anytime. I'll post whatever you and I discuss without editing.
Change my mind. Maybe you ARE the right guy. But I'd like to hear it from you directly.
39 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Oh, crap.
And he has a book coming out in January.
wow, Mark Cuban reads this site
Mark Cuban
by No Southern Belle on Nov 11, 2007 12:45 PM CST up reply actions
The goatee...
To be completely honest, Al was a great guy and a lot of fun to hang out with. It was my pleasure to sit on those panels with him. BCB is lucky to have him.
Thanks, man.
And you get extra points for NOT mentioning 1984.
Did this before...
He did the same thing with "Bubble", which Steven Soderburgh directed. This was their first effort attempting distribution in this manner. This is very controversial. In fact, some directors, such as Night Shamalan believes it will help to actually close the doors of theaters.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/20/AR2006012000423.html
by TheEman on Nov 11, 2007 12:30 PM CST reply actions
So far it is a HUGE failure
theatrically. Major chains like Regal refuse to show them because they won't show anything their audience can watch at the same time at home. As a practical matter none of the films
his company has released this way were likely to do much theatrical business anyway. REDACTED is very unlikely to be shown in a major chain for political reasons ( not Bill O'Reilly's favorite film) so they may not lose a whole lot but actually I was surpised to hear they were going day & date release on this as
it might have some theatrical life in non chain theaters who are also not happy with this kind of release.
My company which specializes small art films is considered a virtual dinasour in that we release of films on DVD 5-8 months
after the theatrical release.
The more interesting issue on REDACTED FYI was a fight between Cuban's comany Magnolia and DePalma over the use of
photographs of dead soldiers. While DePalma accused Cuban & Magnolia of censorship in refusing to allow the photos in the film, in fact the issue had nothing to do with censorship and everything to do with not having legal clearence to use the photos. Slightly OT but interesting and it is not often the
issues of art film distribution come up on the BCB so I can't resist.
by jessica on Nov 11, 2007 5:29 PM CST up reply actions
Redacted....
I agree with you that political considerations are likely part of the reason it won't get wider distribution.
We'll see how the reviews are this coming weekend. "Bubble" got widely panned. If "Redacted" gets good reviews, people will see it, whether at theaters or by buying or renting the DVD.
This sort of thing has been done before...
To quote IMDB:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0086112/trivia
Pirates of Penzance was shown on a Los Angeles television movies channel - SelecTV - simultaneously with its theatrical release. This was only the second time that something like this had been tried - in 1956, Laurence Olivier's 1955 film version of Shakespeare's "Richard III" had its U.S. premiere in New York City and its television premiere on NBC on the same day. Like "The Pirates of Penzance", "Richard III" was also a box office flop, but unlike the former film, "Richard III" won universal acclaim from the critics, became a film classic, and was not boycotted during its theatrical run.
and
The film's failure at the box office had nothing to do with the reviews, which were often quite positive. The real problem lay with Universal's decision to release the film simultaneously to SelectTV and to theaters. Theater owners were so angry that they boycotted the film; in the end, a grand total of 92 theaters agreed to show it, and it enjoyed a long run at only one of them (in Washington, DC, where it became a cult success and played several weeks).
I can't believe we are talking about this. Please let something happen regarding the Cubs that we can talk about. (Signing Kaz Matsui is not an acceptable option).
Al
What do you think would be the best time for the sale to happen for the team?
by puckishcubsfan on Nov 11, 2007 12:31 PM CST reply actions
The "best time"?
It's going to happen, eventually. Whoever the new owner is, will either keep or replace the current staff, probably some of both. And then we shall move on to the future.
I don't really understand the question, is what I'm saying.
You're right
What I meant was what do you think would be the best time for the sale to happen as far as what would happen with the team?
I want to say midseason. Have time for things to settle before the next offseason.
And I don't think it would really impact the locker room because the Tribune is a faceless organization. If it was an individual I think it would be more of an impact.
I think the players probably associate McDonough as their boss and I don't expect him to be replaced until the offseason if he is. Same with Hendry.
by puckishcubsfan on Nov 11, 2007 3:24 PM CST up reply actions
It won't matter.
Al..
Being an admirer of Cuban and a semi-regular reader of his blog, it immediately reminded me of one of my favorite quotes of all time, directly from Cuban himself:
All that matters in business is that you get it right once.
Then everyone can tell you how lucky you are.
Just thought that you, or someone, might find that interesting.
I agree with that quote completely.
Cuban
Maybe not.
Also
I like him more than I did before the show.
by puckishcubsfan on Nov 11, 2007 3:25 PM CST up reply actions
Similar reaction to Bud
Now, I won't go as far as Al did with Cuban and say I was impressed with Bud's business savvy, or anything savvy for that matter. And don't get me wrong - I still think Bud has made many many stupid decisions during his tenure and baseball has suffered because of it. But he did strike me as a true fan, and somebody that I wouldn't mind sitting down with and having a hotdog and a beer (or custard as it were) and talk some baseball.
Now, if he'll just keep his nose clean during the Cubs sale process...
Al and M Cuban
Since the end of the season not much happening but I always check.
Not surprised
With all the hostility against him among the baseball establishment, I'm sure he doesn't want to do anything to rock the boat.
So far he's been far more low key than anybody expected.
One more comment about Cuban (+1)
He has money, not like Trump who is worth money. There is a difference.
Bud Selig and the old boys network engrained in baseball needs a new owner that will bring baseball into the 21st centry. "The Boss" is dead, well stepping aside. Baseball needs Cuban.
Why not the Cubs?!
Cuban...
I see what you mean about "manipulating the system". He's tried to do that with the Mavericks, too -- and the NBA hasn't been real happy with him. I can see how the "old boy network" might not want someone like him. But I'd like to know WHY you say "Baseball needs Cuban".
Maybe you're right. Tell me why.
WAIT, Al!
by TheEman on Nov 11, 2007 10:06 PM CST up reply actions
Oh, absolutely.
But the point was, Cuban has an image, I think, of being a "young turk", and he's not as young as a lot of people think -- actually, I thought he was in his early 40's myself, until I checked.
Tell you why
IMO I believe Cuban would reinvigorate baseball akin to Stienbrenner did back in the 70's. The Boss good or bad reset the watermark for baseball. The Yankees are the most recognized team on the planet. That's because of marketing overseas and taking advantage of the system.
Regarding Cuban I'm not talking about fluky P.T Barnum non-sense that is just fluff for the crowd. Cheerleaders are not the answer. I am talking about opening doors for news streams of talent to an even greater extent. Latin America, and the Asian peninsula is a hot bed of talent and the Cubs had Heesop Choi as the only notable Asian on the team. I find that alarming. I believe Cuban would leave no stone unturned and make the Cubs an easier choice for players overseas that are only exposed to the Yankees and the Red Sox. I believe he would embrace the global game of baseball more then the stodgy purists that anchor it down by living in the past.
Baseball needs a face lift badly. Steroids and HGH stories are the more talked about then the Red Sox WS victory. I find that sad.
It's a shame that Cuban couldn't buy the Pirates, his favorite team. That is were his talent would really show as a maverick owner and motivator. The Cubs are an easy sell with a huge fan base in place, the Cubs are on the verge of going global akin to the Yankees/R. Sox in the right hands. I believe Cuban would be the person that took them to newer, greater heights.
I'm not sure...
I do agree with you that 50 is the new 30, though. :)
Note
Fun defined regarding Mark Cuban
2 verbal wit or mockery (often at another's expense but not to be taken seriously); "he became a figure of fun"; "he said it in sport"
3 violent and excited activity; "she asked for money and then the fun began"; "they began to fight like fun"
4 playfulness: a disposition to find (or make) causes for amusement; "her playfulness surprised me"; "he was fun to be with"
5 amusing: providing enjoyment; pleasantly entertaining; "an amusing speaker"; "a diverting story"; "a fun thing to do"
For some reason # 3 seems to be a better fit of the definition. I would take 40% #3, 40% #5 and 20 % #1.
Does that answer 100% of your question?
I'm for Cuban because he's the only
Don't get me wrong. Party animals like Stanton Cook have been fun to have around. I'd just like to see someone who seems to tie his ego directly to his team's success. It might not be healty for Cuban, but I'll take my chances on what it might mean for us fans.
by TR on Nov 12, 2007 7:17 PM CST reply actions
Don Levin...
I think Levin's public comments show him to be the same sort of guy in terms of winning that Cuban is -- well, except for the "Dancing With The Stars" sort of ego.
Also,
by TR on Nov 12, 2007 7:19 PM CST reply actions
Do you think...
And aren't we looking for a successful businessman (or group)? Does it really matter if they've run a sports team before? Cuban hadn't, before the Mavs.
I've not heard anything
I wonder if he is involved in bidding at all?
by TheEman on Nov 13, 2007 12:25 PM CST up reply actions

by 


















