How About Haren?
Just for the sake of striking up some conversation, do you guys believe that Haren will be traded, and if so, what would it take for the Cubs to land him?
I'm thinkin about 2-3 prospects. Buster Olney states in his blog that he doesn't have a no-trade clause.
One would only have to pay him $4 mil in 2008, $5.5 mil in 2009, and a $6.75 mil option for 2010. Sounds like a much better deal than Santana.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
if you could trade for him
that being said, I highly doubt that he will be traded.
by mike @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Nov 29, 2007 4:00 PM CST reply actions
Good chance Oakland will trade one or more
That being said, I don't see the Cubs being a serious contender for either of them because we simply don't have the bargaining chips needed to play a game of Baseball Hold'em with Billy the Beane. If Minnesota got Delmon Young for Matt Garza, it's a pretty safe bet that Oakland is going to ask for a lot in exchange for Haren. And they'll probably get it from one of the teams (Bos, NYY, NYM) that DON'T get Santana.
I'd love to have him
Heartbeat
beane....
If Gallagher and something else would do the job
The thing with this team is we don't have many holes, but we don't go very deep either. We don't have a surplus at 1B, 2B, 3B, LF, CF, C, SP No. 1-3, RP No. 1-3, but we don't have guys to fill in those holes either.
The Angels, Yankees, and Red Sox have a clusterf**% of talent, the Dodgers have pitching depth, etc.

by 


















