I do not see the harm
in someone giving their opinion as to who may or may not have been on the juice. Using the term Mcarthyism as Ive read it here on several posts seems out of line to me as there is no way any of these comments are going to be used against any player , causing them to lose there jobs or cause their reputations to be harmed. Also , as I agree with other posters , these comments are also not libel , they are simply opinions that DO have relevency as to which players get signed , or not , and by which team . It is intesting that many posters will defend players , mostly Cubs players of course , that they do not know personally or will ever have a conversation with much less a freindship . Personally I would chose to defend those fellow BCB posters who have been slammed by others on this site with swearing , ridiculing , and in at least one instance calling someone a liar.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
99 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Good god you're incoherent
Without access to any direct evidence you're just pulling these "opinions" out of your butt based on indirect observation. Wait for the damn report, which will be, by the way, based on actual evidence and not specious allegations.
If you can't see why that kind of talk is pointless, harmful, and dangerous then there's really no getting through to you.
I have used the term McCarthyism
McCarthyism was a political witch hunt in which people were accused of acts that were supposedly detrimental to the U.S. by being a communist without any form of evidence to support their claims.
Some people want to label baseball players as being steroid users, which some feel is detrimental to the integrity of baseball, without any evidence to support their claims.
I think the correlation between the two is very relevant as this blog is read by not only fans but also baseball personal and writers. If we are to start rumors into who used steroid or who did not use steroids is, in and of itself, a steroid witch hunt. I, for one, love this site and feel it ruins the integrity of it by constant diaries labeling players as steroid users without any proof or evidence.
Even MLBTR uses some sort of source for their wild trade claims, people who want to say players used steroid use absolutely no evidence to support their claims besides a hunch or their gut feelings.
Lets go back shall we ...............
by BALLGIRL on Dec 10, 2007 2:56 PM CST up reply actions
How is that a sign of steroid use?
To me, I see a lot of guys who went from very good to great (Bonds, Giambi) and from mediocre to above average (all of those middle relievers who've been caught, etc).
I can't think of any examples of guys who went from hitting 10 home runs a year to suddenly hitting 50, even though that's the popular conception of what steroids can do.
Brady Anderson
Allegedly.
You Didn't Ask For Proof
by markleonette on Dec 11, 2007 12:00 AM CST up reply actions
No....
Known steroid users. We do not know if Anderson did steroids, we only suspect. And again, that suspicion is based on the specious assumption that steroids can turn Jimmy Olson into Superman.
Using this level pf evidence
by NO100 on Dec 11, 2007 10:47 AM CST up reply actions
What other standard should we use?
We have no basis for believing that steroids can have that kind of impact on a player. Home runs haven't decreased since testing began, but people are ignoring that. There are other possible explanations for the radically different performance of guys like Anderson and Luis Gonzalez, but people have made up their minds.
In a way it will be a relief when the Mitchell report comes out Thursday because we'll actually have evidence on some players, so maybe we can get away from these baseless accusations and stick to impeaching the provably guilty.
Brett Boone
Of course, you have to take Canseco's words as face value -- there's no proof this incident actually took place.
Boone, who was in a free-agent contract year, went to the Mariners at the age of 32 -- he goes from 19 to 37 HR's, in 2001 -- moving from a hitters to a pitchers park. (Qualcomm to Safeco) He has his career years at ages 32, 33, 34. (He signed a multi-year deal with the Mariners at the start of the 2002 season)
And, when steroid talk starts to roll around the majors, his career falls off the table and ends abruptly -- he's finished by 2005, essentially. Note the dramatic drop in his stats (see link below)
Does this sound like a natural career progression to you??
He even 'authored' an article for Playboy Magazine, which I still have somewhere -- the theme of it was "How I went from a weakling to a powerhouse" and he chalked it all up to 'better diet" and to 'working out' for the first time in his career.
I really didn't believe the story at the time (there was no talk of drugging then) and wondered how a washed-up hitter could suddenly double his power output.
Boone flew under the radar, I allege -- he did the 'roids, and got out of baseball before the headlines started flying. Just because you stopped eating cheeseburgers and hit the gym 10 hours a day in your 30s -- no way does that translate to how his career skyrockted in his early 30's.
It's a mini Barry Bonds story, really -- but his career progression is on a smaller scale, as compared to Bonds. I think Boone did what he did to save his career, and get that last mega-buck contract with Seattle. There's no proof, obviously.
But it's all suspicious, to me.
Boone's stats:
tp://www.baseball-reference.com/b/boonebr01.shtml
by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Dec 11, 2007 1:59 PM CST up reply actions
re: Brett Boone
And by the way
"Prince Fielder Dies Of Inside-The-Park Homerun" - The Onion by DTJchris on Wednesday, October 24, 2007 at 12:43 PM CTFOR SOMEONE WHO LIKES TO CALL OUT THOSE WHO NAME NAMES THIS COMMENT IN THE STEROID DIARY SURE SEEMS A LITTLE HYPOCRITICAL .
No kidding...
Are you really that clueless?
Wow, seriously, get a clue
re: Lets go back shall we ...............
No kidding.
First of all...
That said, this topic has come up numerous times in the last few weeks, with the same consensus sentiments. Maybe it's time to acknowledge that the community has settled on a position, and move on. At least until the actual report is made available.
You thought that too, huh?
Is it just me?
What about names not on the report?
I do not see the harm.
And, hell, it's not like we weren't discussing this in her last diary or anything.
Strange...
If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, well...
ha ha, that's good
It it looks like a KOW, smells like a KOW, moo's like a KOW, well...
Alas, I am not that witty
We're all going to end up looking...
You're being nasty
Note that this is "ballgirl's" first post here, and we've already established that KOW has no scruples about using a proxy server to hide her identity.
Something rotten in denmark right here, methinks.
re: You're being nasty
re: First of all...
name in all caps
by buckmulligan on Dec 10, 2007 6:05 PM CST up reply actions
note that this new identity
Guys, I need some moral support here.
Please. Convince me it's not worth it. Convince me I'm a better person than that.
I was actually....
I'll start:
I do not believe that Raquel Welch or Ed Asner were on that grassy knoll.
I can't rule out any of the Fondas.
i will add...
Yes and...
And Hannah Montana.
whoa, whoa, whoa
Exactly!
It really is a perfect
I don't know Al
by HectorVillanueva on Dec 10, 2007 1:10 PM CST up reply actions
Oh, you're filled with hate, dontcha know.
Seriously, though...
If we're all such horrible, awful people, why is she still here?
She is trying to enlighten us
Thanks KOW!
Hearing you mention Daffy Duck...
Quit it. . . . . QUIT IT GUYS...
Thanks for the comical relief on yet another slooooow Monday!
by BigZ 4 Cy on Dec 10, 2007 1:14 PM CST reply actions
That would be...
Who was banned under her previous name, "kerrysotherwife".
I'm sure you can see how the acronym "KOW" came out of that.
And I think you mean "lurker" ...
I don't know whether
if you laugh hard enough...
by BigZ 4 Cy on Dec 10, 2007 1:29 PM CST up reply actions
Just keep thinking...
Laughing again?
Hannah is innocent
She could have used the time travel device...
I think you're thinking of the wrong...
"Phil of the Future" is the show you're thinking of.
Yes, I have adolescent children. This is the only reason for me to know this.
No no no.
(You too?)
I prefer...
pardon me, but...
...she does being that she's been linked to dr. emmet brown!
KOW
Notice the diary did not begin:
Subject: I do not see the harm
Comment: I do not see the harm in someone...
I'm not speculating....
I'd say there is a 50/50 chance that Hannah Montana and Burgess Meredith are mentioned in the Mitchell Report.
by Kyle Turney on Dec 10, 2007 1:44 PM CST reply actions
I knew exactly when I saw the title of this diary
I will not read the diary nor any comments within, because I don't give a rats ass one way or the other and find it funny that so many do.
Ok, I broke down and read the comments within
I'm glad I broke down and read the comments because there is some good stuff within this diary.
Al, how old is Hannah?
Well, since my 11-year likes her
She's 15.
If you'd like more info, (and I can't imagine why you wouldn't!), click here.
(She was born November 23, 1992, just turned 15.)
Whew, ok
DTJ? Udder Speculation?
That was my attempt at humor
Moo-ve over.
I mean
Nice thing about this dairy...
cheeses h. christ, that was a reach. sorry. I'll try to come up with something butter or elsie my name isn't Mrs. O'Kerry...
Since this diary has no acutal point...
Did anyone see that the Patriots are opening as 27 (Yes thats almost four TD's, might be a record point spread, not sure about that though) point favorites over the Jets (their last game was where the spy-gate saga started).... if I were a bettin' man, I would say the Pats cover EASILY!! I dont think Bill B. take the foot off the gas pedal or rest any starters in this game. They might not even hand the ball once in this game! I'm thinking Brady breaks paytons record of 49 TDs in this game as well.
by BigZ 4 Cy on Dec 10, 2007 3:57 PM CST reply actions
You think...
(Kidding! Although...)
Anyway, 27 points is an unbelievable line -- I don't think I've seen anything quite like it. And you know what? As dominant as the Pats have been, if I were in Vegas and got that line legally, I think I'd take the Jets and the points. Remember, NE barely beat Baltimore last week, and the Jets are about equal to the Ravens, and the game is at the Meadowlands.
Just sayin'. I think the Jets could cover a spread that large.
Normally I would totaly agree...
I can see them scoring 40+ pretty easily and the Jets dont really have an offense of which to speak of [sounds alot like my favorite team:(, dang ole Ron Turn-over-the playbook-already] so 27 points seem do-able!!
The Steelers have a better D and O and the Pats beat them by 21, when they were motivated, so 27 doesn't seem like that much.
by BigZ 4 Cy on Dec 10, 2007 4:39 PM CST up reply actions
I agree
Just in case...
I imagine there are a few happy legal bettors on the Jets today.
We are not!
Wow its a slow day...
At least I have had a few laughs catching up!
'Cud it be any funnier'
Btw, I like Billy Ray Cyrus. People rip on him because of one stinkin' song, yet there are a lot of people more deserving for that kind of criticism (I nominate Soulja Boy at the moment). If you want to make fun of BRC for something, catch Radical Jack the next time it's on WGN.
With decent material, he's an acceptable actor. But good god, that movie's painful.
This has been awesome!
by Kinky Reggae on Dec 10, 2007 6:46 PM CST up reply actions
Soulja Boy
by Dcubbienole on Dec 11, 2007 12:24 PM CST up reply actions
Wow, the irritability factor is way up
The Fukudome situation and this soon-to-be-infamous Mitchell report must be making all of us grumpy.
There must be a lot of angst towards this KOW / evil twin / mutant poster; whoever that is.
According to ESPN.COM
Seems like the investigators were asking trainers and strength coaches which players they suspected of taking illegal PEDs. Isn't that the same kind of finger-pointing that has been frowned upon here?
I never thought this investigation was a good thing and I don't understand why it wasn't released BEFORE the free agent signing period. MLB (Selig and the owners) are just looking for fall guys to take the blame off them.

by BALLGIRL on 


















