Bleed Cubbie Blue: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: The Boxing Bulletin for Boxing Fans!

The Real, Actual List From The Mitchell Report

After the list that was posted in one of the threads earlier this morning was debunked by several sources as being inaccurate, a corrected, complete list was made available. In the interests of fairness, I thought it would be appropriate to post the correct list on the front page of this site, in handy alphabetical order.

For the record, the list contains the following players who have, at one point in their careers, played for the Cubs (I wish to make it clear that this does NOT necessarily imply that these players used PED's while Cubs, nor does it imply in any way that the Cubs organization is culpable): Matt Franco, Jerry Hairston Jr., Glenallen Hill, Todd Hundley, Gary Matthews Jr., Rafael Palmeiro, Todd Pratt, Benito Santiago, Rondell White.

Allen, Chad
Ankiel, Rick
Bell, David
Bell, Mike
Bennett Jr., Gary
Bonds, Barry
Brown, Kevin
Byrd, Paul
Cabrera, Alex
Caminiti , Ken
Carreon, Mark
Christiansen, Jason
Clark, Howie
Clemens, Roger
Canseco, Jose
Cust, Jack
Donnels, Chris
Donnelly, Brendan
Dykstra, Len
Franco, Matt
Franklin, Ryan
Gagne, Eric
Giambi, Jason
Giambi, Jeremy
Gibbons, Jay
Glaus, Troy
Gonzalez, Juan
Grimsley, Jason
Guillen, Jose
Hairston Jr., Jerry
Herges, Matt
Hiatt, Phil
Hill, Glenallen
Holmes, Darren
Hundley, Todd
Jorgenson, Ryan
Justice, David
Knoblauch, Chuck
Laker, Tim
Lansing, Mike
Lo Duca, Paul
Logan, Exavier (Nook)
Manzanillo, Josias
Matthews, Jr. Gary
McKay, Cody
Mercker, Kent
McGwire, Mark
Miadich, Bart
Naulty, Daniel
Neagle, Denny
Morris, Hal
Palmeiro, Rafael
Parque, Jim
Pettitte, Andy
Pratt, Todd
Randolph, Stephen
Rocker, John
Riggs, Adam
Rios, Armando
Roberts, Brian
Santangelo, F.P.
Santiago, Benito
Schoeneweis, Scott
Segui, David
Sheffield, Gary
Stanton, Mike
Tejada, Miguel
Valdez, Ismael
Vaughn, Mo
Velarde, Randy
Villone, Ron
Vina, Fernando
White, Rondell
Williams, Jeff
Williams, Matt
Williams, Todd
Woodard, Steve
Young, Kevin
Zaun, Gregg

If you would like to download a copy of the Mitchell Report, click here. (WARNING! Opens 409-page .pdf file!) I intend to download and read the whole thing at some point, and I'll have more to say about this after I've digested the reports on the two press conferences (watching Selig's right now), and had some time to think about all of it, probably tomorrow.

0 recs  |  Comment 125 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Greg Zaun
I said to my 14 year old 2 years ago he was juiced. He coud not even reach the warning track.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/z/zaungr01.shtml

Hit more homeruns and RBI at age 33 - 36 than his whole career.

by parrotinct on Dec 13, 2007 3:45 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

The only thing worse than the baseless speculation
...before the report came out, is going to be the flood of gloating "I told you that X was juicing!" comments that have come after.

by Wreckard on Dec 13, 2007 3:48 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

See I told you so...
...check out this diary from 2 days ago.  

http://www.bleedcubbieblue.com/story/2007/12/11/164427/32

Sure I was wrong about 3 guys but I was right about 2 of them.  I checked the math on this and pulling things out of your ass at a 40% clip is pretty good.  

by Kooter on Dec 13, 2007 4:02 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Myass
isn't very reliable
"Prince Fielder Dies Of Inside-The-Park Homerun" - The Onion

by DTJchris on Dec 13, 2007 4:04 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

That's a .400 avg
I'm the Ty Cobb of crappy predictions

by Kooter on Dec 13, 2007 4:10 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Surly, drunk
and like to spike people?
"Prince Fielder Dies Of Inside-The-Park Homerun" - The Onion

by DTJchris on Dec 13, 2007 4:15 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah I'm a Surly drunk....
....but you forgot dispicable racist and overall loathsome individual.

by Kooter on Dec 13, 2007 4:20 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I didn't want to speculate
; )
"Prince Fielder Dies Of Inside-The-Park Homerun" - The Onion

by DTJchris on Dec 13, 2007 4:21 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

There should be..........
no gloating.  IMHO, this is a very sad day.  For baseball, the players, their families, and the fans.

All that being said, this is not the end of this.  The first list of players that was "leaked" was, IMHO, done so to send a message.

I believe that Mitchell only listed players for whom he had both smoke and fire.  The players who were named in the first list were the players for where there was only smoke.  

It will be interesting to see if players like Wood, Prior, Nomar, ect. decide to sue the CNBC.  My guess is that they will not.

This is only the begining.  This is the tip of the iceberg.

"You are an asshole": NDcubsfan

by timeforachange on Dec 13, 2007 5:29 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

They can't sue.
Nor would they want to. As "Public Figures" THEY would have to prove that A. The information is  false B. CNBC KNEW IT TO BE FALSE or was almost psychotically reckless . It is not enough that they made a BIG mistake and may or may not have harmed the
players reputations ( and oh ya they would also have to prove that the listing cost them financial damages). This is why public figures almost never sue  in  the United States and those few who do almost never win. It takes an extraordinary case like
Carol Burnett who showed that the National Enquirer basically
KNEW that that when the published an article claiming she was
drunk in public it was a lie but short of that you just waste money and expose yourself to discovery hell.
"It's the Cubbies. There's always a vibe. It's the greatest vibe in baseball." Greg Maddux on Cub fan's optimism even after the 06 debacle.

by jessica on Dec 13, 2007 6:09 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

By naming........
the players in their report, it could be argued that they are limiting their ability to earn a salary.  If innocent of these "charges" I would sue CNBS in a NY Minute.  I would do whatever I could to clear my name and restore my reputation.

FYI, there have been a number of slander suits brought against the "rags" that have been successful.

"You are an asshole": NDcubsfan

by timeforachange on Dec 13, 2007 6:17 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

VERY few suits are successful
And they are for libel not slander ( written as oppossed to spoken).Even innocent people do NOT want to go through with it
because the burden of proof is nearly impossible if you are a public figure. You literally have to prove that CNBC  postively knew the list was wrong and posted it anyway or were criminally reckless which is an unprovable  standard. CNBC could have been, stupid, greedy, careless etc and cost those players dearly but they would still lose.
Now if they had been CRICKET players it would be another story since the laws are virtually the reverse in the UK in that the publishing party must defent the accuracy of the information and will lose if they do publish false materials.
"It's the Cubbies. There's always a vibe. It's the greatest vibe in baseball." Greg Maddux on Cub fan's optimism even after the 06 debacle.

by jessica on Dec 13, 2007 7:06 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I want them to sue
Actually the facts are with the players who they named who weren't on the report.  

MSNBC lied and said they were on the report and they weren't.

I do want them to sue and win and it might stop the media from doing these things.  In their rush to be first not checking sources.

We are all waiting for that glorious October night when we finally win it all. Until then we will continue to cheer, never do the wave and hope.

by cubstoseriesby100 on Dec 13, 2007 10:35 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You are a piece of work....
MSNBC didn't "lie."  They were given leaked information that turned out to not be true.  Blame it on whoever their source was.  Blame the source, ultimately, not MSNBC.  I'm pretty sure they don't go around making these things up randomly.  I'm also pretty sure that this "source" was fairly reliable.

If you can't see the difference between "lying" and being given false information, then I feel really sorry for you.  So please, stop with all this "lying" BS that you keep nagging about in regards to the media.  It's really annoying.

by jjmarie30 on Dec 14, 2007 3:34 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

The rags...
...there have been a number of slander suits brought against the "rags" that have been successful.

I always liked the defense the Weekly World News would use.  It was whatever the legalese version of "Everybody knows we make this stuff up!" is, and they knew very well that the sort of paper (!) that would run headlines like "Green Kids from UFOs Baffle Top Scientists!" is not meant to be taken seriously.  They are now gone, sadly, and supermarket checkout lines are just not the same.

The Enquirer, on the other hand, has seemingly tried to rise to the level of credibility of...well...maybe E!, leaving the real nonsense to the Star and Sun and the like.  Still, I miss the old B&W Weekly World News.  Too weird for words...

by MN exile on Dec 13, 2007 10:38 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I told you
parrotinct was a speculator!

:)

MMMMM...Golden shrimp and chicken combo from Ron of Japan!

by Kinky Reggae on Dec 13, 2007 3:51 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

sorry
for the inaccurate name list I posted earlier but I did preface with "rumored list".

I just got done reading the report.  Amazing stuff.

by gocubsgo22 on Dec 13, 2007 3:53 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Why Is Sosa listed?
There was only one reference to Sosa, and was only in regards to his lawyer not responding to Mitchell's request.
"In all the categories that you pay the most attention to, except the loss column, we're doing very well" - Jim Hendry

by Jayo525 on Dec 13, 2007 3:54 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

I agree
He may have forgot how to speak English but the report does not say anything about him using PED's, HGH, Andro, roids or even Flitstones vitamins.

I think we should remove Sammy from this list.  

PS- this doesn't mean I think he is innocent OR guilty but we should be as fair as possible.

by Kooter on Dec 13, 2007 3:59 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Mmmm Flinstone vitamins
"In all the categories that you pay the most attention to, except the loss column, we're doing very well" - Jim Hendry

by Jayo525 on Dec 13, 2007 4:22 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Selig press conference
I wish the writers strike wasn't going on I'd love to see SNL do a bit on Selig at this press conference.

by grooveska on Dec 13, 2007 3:56 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Don't think it would matter
Frankly, I don't see how SNL could make Selig look any more foolish than he did himself
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Dec 13, 2007 4:03 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You seem to imply
That SNL is funny even when they DO have writers. I'm confused.

by WittyUserName on Dec 13, 2007 6:53 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Brian Roberts?
Let's see if this cools off the chase for him.  I don't think it will.
------ TheRiot Squad ------

by RightFieldSucks on Dec 13, 2007 3:57 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Roberts and 'Roids
The thing about Roberts is that if he is on the juice first, hair samples can be used for testing to see if he has juiced in recent years to prove his innocence  (if not, he might want to get that crew cut and body wax now).  Second, the question remains, if his performance is enhanced, then why take a chance on a big contract.  One year to prove himself playing while clean.  In other words, if he is clean this coming year and maintains performance then he is cleared.  If not, then we have evidence and can send him on his way.  

I guess my problem is that his numbers aren't THAT much better than DeRo.  And that difference might be because of the juice.

Finally, a lot of BCB'ers always wants to toss our guys for somebody else's problem.  A lot of our young players like The Riot and Marshall just finished their first full year in the show.  Pie was in and out all year and Sam Fuld just at the end of the year.  I'm just glad that Sweet Lou is running the show and will work and develop these players instead of kicking them to the curb the first chance he gets.

I want my Macias!

by wombat on Dec 14, 2007 9:18 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Isn't it ironic...
 That most of these players have been hurt and needed to "rehab". Look at Rondell White! And I think Farnsworth and John Rocker had some anger issues!
Can't wait for the Cubs in '08!!!

by fuzzycubfan on Dec 13, 2007 4:02 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

It still doesn't change the fact.....
....that 2 memories that will always stick out to me in the last 10 years or so involving those guys were Glenallen Hills homerun into the builing across Waveland and Kyle Farnsworth beating the crap of out one of the Reds.

by Kooter on Dec 13, 2007 4:08 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Paul Wilson
"...and a couple of Haymakers landed"  -Chip
Dear God did he annihilate him.

Replaying that in my head it makes me think, and I may be in the minority, but I miss Chip and Steve.

"In all the categories that you pay the most attention to, except the loss column, we're doing very well" - Jim Hendry

by Jayo525 on Dec 13, 2007 4:27 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Farnsworth's fight was more like a great
football tackle, and the Bears could really use him on Monday night.
A good day for me is a cubs win and a sox loss.

by diehardmark on Dec 13, 2007 4:40 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Is it fair to include Sosa's name
on your list if he was mentioned only once in the Mitchell Report, on page 85, as someone whose lawyer was sent a letter but did not provide answers?

"(I sent similar letters with specific questions to lawyers for Barry Bonds, Rafael Palmeiro, Sammy Sosa, and Gary Sheffield, none of whom provided answers to my questions either.)"

by flachimesa on Dec 13, 2007 4:04 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

All I did was...
... post a list of players who were actually mentioned in the report. I believe everyone should read the entire report -- yes, I know it's almost 400 pages. I intend to do so as soon as I can.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Dec 13, 2007 4:16 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I do appreciate you providing the list but...
According to your logic doesn't it mean you should provide the names of players like Matt Karchner and Frank Thomas who may not have been implicated but names were still included.
"In all the categories that you pay the most attention to, except the loss column, we're doing very well" - Jim Hendry

by Jayo525 on Dec 13, 2007 4:31 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree
If Sammy is on the list than you should include Matt Karchner and Frank Thomas as well.

by amisaid1 on Dec 13, 2007 4:49 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Based on what?
n/t
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Dec 13, 2007 4:52 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Names
Based on their names appearing in the report.  You had said that your reasoning for including Sammy's name is because he is listed in the report.  Both Frank Thomas and Matt Karchner's names are listed in the report as well but they are not included on your list.

by amisaid1 on Dec 13, 2007 4:58 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Where in the report?
If I missed some names, then I should have included them.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Dec 13, 2007 5:10 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Alexander is identified as the
Red Sox infielder in whose car were found anabolic steroids and syringes on p. 97.  (It was just a coincidence that I was on p. 97 in my reading). It does go on to say that he was tested and that the results were negative. And, although he's a former player, he is listed as a Red Sox player, and it had been mentioned earlier that there were no Red Sox in the report.  

by philadelphiacub on Dec 13, 2007 5:16 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Names
Matt Karchner on page 280

Frank Thomas on page 11, 118, 367

Manny Alexander page 97 and 139

by amisaid1 on Dec 13, 2007 5:20 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Are you nuts????????
As much as I despise Frank Thomas, HE COOPERATED with the Mitchell Investigative Team!  I have never seen his name associated with the use of PEDs.
"You are an asshole": NDcubsfan

by timeforachange on Dec 13, 2007 5:31 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not saying he is guilty
Al said he put Sammy's name on the list because it appears in the Mitchell report.  It doesn't appear in there because he did anything wrong only in noting that he testified before Congress.  Al responded that the list of names on his list were all player names that appeared in the Mitchell report.  I just named a few other names that are in the report but not on Al's posted list.

by amisaid1 on Dec 13, 2007 5:36 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I stand corrected.....
My appologies......
"You are an asshole": NDcubsfan

by timeforachange on Dec 13, 2007 6:02 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Using That Criteria
Fergie Jenkins is also in the report!
PERRY!!!!

by Goat Whisperer on Dec 13, 2007 7:27 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Adam Piatt
is in the report but not on list. He is mentioned 53 times. He is a former major league player (OAK and TB).

by flachimesa on Dec 13, 2007 8:09 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

and Larry Bigbie is listed 93 times
but not on the list.

Do you still want names that you left out?

by flachimesa on Dec 13, 2007 8:27 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Going through the report....
The only mention of Sosa in the entire report was that he was invited to speak to Mitchell, and he nor his lawyer ever responded to the req.

I do not think that makes a worthy case for his name being added to the long list you started the diary with.

Good Guys Wear Blue

by Cubskingdom on Dec 13, 2007 8:57 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Perhaps you should make that distinction clear...
It very much reads as a list of players implicated by the Mitchell report, not a list of names mentioned in the report.

Being mentioned and being implicated are of course very different things, and it isn't remotely clear that you were only referring to names mentioned.

by SouthernCub on Dec 13, 2007 5:30 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree 100%
I am not a fan of Sammy Sosa at all but he is not implicated in this report.

by amisaid1 on Dec 13, 2007 5:38 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: I agree 100%
He is implicated that he did NOT cooperate with the investiagation. I think there is a reason he did not cooperate - it is the same reason he needed a translator in front of congress.

Guilty

Aug 15 - Ted Lilly walked by the lineup card and said to nobody in particular "I can't believe I'm batting 9th again".

by mweil on Dec 13, 2007 8:39 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

OK, OK...
... I should have made the distinction between names simply MENTIONED in the report, and names of players IMPLICATED in using PED's -- the list in this post is the latter.

Hope that clears it up.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Dec 13, 2007 9:38 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Don't you mean the former?
Since Sosa is not IMPLICATED, he's merely MENTIONED.

In the interest of fairness, maybe it would be best actually clarify that in the title (or diary itself), rather than just buried down in the posts?

The natural inclination is to read this list and assume you're listing those players implicated.

by SouthernCub on Dec 14, 2007 8:45 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

What does this mean
for Clemens legacy?  

Barry Bonds has been the poster boy for records being tainted by PED's but now that someone as celebrated as Clemens being on there, what does this mean?

"Prince Fielder Dies Of Inside-The-Park Homerun" - The Onion

by DTJchris on Dec 13, 2007 4:07 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

This really takes me back
It was 1692...Salem, Massachusetts and the PED's of the day were Tarrot Cards and Ouiji Boards.  All it took was a pissed off neighbor.  

The sources for some of this may be credible may not.  What if just one person is dragged through the mud so Selig can save face?  I don't like it.

I have a hard time casting blame on all of these guys at once.  A quick read of several sections provides information that would never hold up in a court of law.  There is WAAAAAY too much heresay and circumstantial evidence.

by Kooter on Dec 13, 2007 4:15 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

What needs to happen...
.... for total disclosure, is the commisioner needs to sit each every player, current and hopefully former, and give them a chance to first defend themselves.

Second, the player should be given a 50/100 games suspension.  That player should be given the oppurtunity to assist with the ongoing investigation, by supplying more names/evidence to find the rest of the users.  If that player reveals names of players that can be proven to have been users, their suspension could be cut in half.

Then, and only then can this be put to rest.

What a Black Thursday for Baseball!!

"Here is a test to find whether your mission on earth is finished: If you're alive it isn't". ~ Richard Bach

by BigZ 4 Cy on Dec 13, 2007 4:28 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

So I have a 100 game suspension
I name Bonds, Grimsley, Giambi, Tejada, G. Hill, Kent Mercker and Eric Gagne.

There my suspension is cut in half.  Yeah for me!

by Kooter on Dec 13, 2007 4:31 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Looking through the report...
... it appears that every player was given the opportunity to meet with Mitchell, and virtually all of them declined.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Dec 13, 2007 4:35 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I mean they should..
..meet with Bud or get suspended for the full lenght of their suspension (50/100games), this would be different then meeting with Mitchell.
"Here is a test to find whether your mission on earth is finished: If you're alive it isn't". ~ Richard Bach

by BigZ 4 Cy on Dec 13, 2007 4:44 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

So just because their was a rat....
..in the Yankee and Met clubhouses all those guys should be suspended?  I'm not using rat as a derogatory term but if all this info was gleaned from just 3-4 major sources then guys in clubhouses who didn't have a leak go scott free?  

This report was anything but fair...take a look at how many current Red Sox there are....ZERO.  And which team does Mitchell sit on the board of?  The Red Sox.

Though FP Santangelo does need to be suspended and we need to put an asterisk next to every hit he ever got.

by Kooter on Dec 13, 2007 4:52 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I Think
the overall point of the Mitchell report is being missed by many.  Fair or unfair, this is what Senator Mitchell came up with.  Whether or not he is protecting the Red Sox is irrelevant.  The report is out.  This is MLB's first step toward fixing what is almost universally seen as a major problem.

Suspensions by Selig, without better evidence in most cases, will be the fuel with which the players' union may well litigate for the next thousand years.  Unless there is agreement between Selig and Fehr I doubt we'll see mass suspensions, if any.

The court of public opinion, however, will force many players (Clemens) into retirement and others into less than desirable negotiating positions vis-a-vis new contracts.

For anyone to think the report would have somehow been the final word is really short sighted.  It is simply the equivalent of an official letting of the cat-out-of-the-bag.

The game has received a black eye.  There will, no doubt, be many more bumps and bruises before it is over.  I fear this is only the beginning and I don't feel any differently than I did yesterday.  The fact is, it will be years before any of us know the real story.

And so it goes.

by Luigi on Dec 13, 2007 6:44 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Paging Sen. McCarthy...
"Mr. Clemens, are you, or have you ever been, a member of the communist party?"

Investigations are fine.  Calling upon players to snitch upon other players to get their sentence reduced?

Not so much.

Worst to First in 2007, brought to you by Lou, Sori, A-Ram and D-Lee.

by drewishdrewid on Dec 13, 2007 4:39 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

The denial
"My Homer is not a communist. He may be a liar, a pig, an idiot, a communist, but he is not a porn star!" -Grandpa Simpson

by Kooter on Dec 13, 2007 4:42 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Forget disclosure
Full random blood testing in and out of season is the only possible answer.  Cycling and track and field get trashed by lots of people but they are really trying to clean up things.  That is why you see people busted all the time in the Olympics.  A lot of stick and ball sports people in the USA trash on these sports for being dirty.  Well guess what - your sports are just as dirty.
I want my Macias!

by wombat on Dec 14, 2007 9:21 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Wood
Glad he's not on it.
"Have Keith Moreland drop a routine fly. Give everybody two bags of peanuts and a frosty malt, And I'll be ready to die." -Steve Goodman

by danimal15 on Dec 13, 2007 4:32 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Me too
Can't believe it, actually. I thought he'd be on it
"We are going to light up the SB Nation server farm like a Christmas tree." - cwyers

by NittanyCub on Dec 13, 2007 5:02 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Heh...
He was a whole lot skinnier last year...

>8)

by Shawon O Meter on Dec 13, 2007 5:24 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

It sounds like very little was obtained...
other than the BALCO stuff and whatever the two "witnesses" reported.  Those guys weren't affiliated with the Cubs, so it's not that surprising that more Cubs aren't named.

For what it's worth, it doesn't sound like this list of names is very good.  There are likely to be some names on the list who DIDN'T do steroids, and many names omitted who DID.

by SouthernCub on Dec 13, 2007 5:26 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Several of the players mentioned
have very flimsy links to possible steroid use.  I didn't read the whole report but I think the general commentary is good unfortunately the list of names will take away from the better parts of the report.

by rlpete on Dec 13, 2007 5:37 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

on MLB.TV..
...the cardinals are having a freaking press conference.

About the former and current (Franklin and Ankiel) being in the report. The dude also praises the Cardinals players/employees/coachs for their cooperation.  And how they sumitted all documents for Senetor Mitchell.

WHOPPEY-DO-DA-DEE!! congrat-u-f'en'-lations, I think thats what your suppose to do.  

Man if every club has one of these 'jokes', its going to be a long, long, day!

"Here is a test to find whether your mission on earth is finished: If you're alive it isn't". ~ Richard Bach

by BigZ 4 Cy on Dec 13, 2007 4:40 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Great Job Mcfail
So you traded one Juiced up player (Sosa) for another juiced up player(Hairston). Now I have another reason to hate Dykstra.
A good day for me is a cubs win and a sox loss.

by diehardmark on Dec 13, 2007 4:45 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

That's just a sickening list.
Some of those names in particular really make me sick to my stomach.

I'll wait until I read the report in its entirety before I make too many judgments. Really, really sad.

by Mark H on Dec 13, 2007 5:01 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Why?
Not one name surprises me.  In fact, I know the real list of users is quite a bit longer.  

by rlpete on Dec 13, 2007 5:10 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

A few comments
The press conferences... Selig came out worse than I expected, Fehr better than I did. I will admit that I missed part of Selig's presser but no where did he sound contrite or willing to accept any of the blame. Perhaps this came after the local ESPN radio station here (Austin) went back to local broadcasting. Selig sounded like the typical gasbag that he is. Every Selig speech is filled with arrogance and I thought on a day like today, he'd get off of his high horse. Nope.

Fehr, who I have always loathed actually admitted that they were late to act and certainly seemed calm, unwilling to yell down the report. Fehr did a great job straddling the fence, protecting his union players named but also not closing the door on the real issue.

I do believe that there is a lot more out there and Steve Phillips actually did a great job articulating that. Yes, some names appeared but as Phillips said, there was no middle ground, a few stars named, then a ton of scrubs. To me, this doesn't really put much to rest. There are dozens of Kirk Radomskis and Brian McNamees out there.

DmL

by dmlichte on Dec 13, 2007 5:38 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Thanks
I can't stand Selig.  I'd rather listen to Joe Morgan talk than Selig.  He makes me want to throw something at the TV.  Since my wife wouldn't appeciate that with the new flat screen so I could not watch his press statement.  I figured he was be his usual buffoon but I hadn't seen anyone comment.  

by rlpete on Dec 13, 2007 5:44 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I know, I know...
Its Selig, Morgan, and Bush for me. I HAVE thrown stuff at my TV for all of 'em.
Wait 'til next year. And the next. And the Next. And the next after that too.

by TheEman on Dec 13, 2007 8:13 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Randy Bush
has been a solid assistant GM for us and rarely ever appears  on TV.

I don't know why you'd want to throw anything at the screen when he's on.  Maybe you have some grudge against the 1987 Twins.

<g>

The artist formerly known as JoshinLA

by Josh77 on Dec 14, 2007 3:29 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm assuming he was referring to the President...
...could be wrong though
"In all the categories that you pay the most attention to, except the loss column, we're doing very well" - Jim Hendry

by Jayo525 on Dec 14, 2007 11:22 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Selig did his usual two-face act
In his speech and during the Q&A, whenever the topic was players, he made it very clear he was going to take whatever action he could as soon as he could, on a case by case basis.  Yet whenever the topic was owners or MLB/himself, he only talked about moving forward, next steps, and of course, patting himself on the back for initiating this report.

In other words, players get prosecuted, owners/MLB get pardoned.

What a tool...

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Dec 13, 2007 6:30 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed. Agreed. Agreed!
I commented earlier today about how the whole Mitchell Report is empty in evaluating the ownership side of the problem.  What a total joke.  

The players took the PEDs, but it was a system that made it clear that you needed the juice to compete or there was a guy willing to take your place who would.  Who is kidding who?

On another note, it seems big-mouth Clemens now has to sue his trainer for liable, or the trainer sues Clemens for liable (for accusing him of lying to Mitchell).  Either way, I would love to see that big Texas schmuck under oath.

I can't wait for 2008!

by LAcarl519 on Dec 13, 2007 7:09 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

So the jerk Dylan Rat-again of CNBC
says, "prominent Yankee and Cub pitchers are named in the report."  This was well after the report was released.

I emailed the gas bag and asked him to retract the statement.  Of course there was nothing.  What a total jerk.  CNBC was still reporting names off the blogs because they were too lazy to read.  This is the same way their staff does stock research--half-assed.

I can't wait for 2008!

by LAcarl519 on Dec 13, 2007 6:07 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

A lot of people are quick to judge...
...the players on that list. And, sure, a lot of them were expected, based on leaks from the BALCO investigation, or Jose Canseco, or other sources. But people are ready to throw Brian Roberts under the bus just because Larry Bigbie said so. Writing a check to a clubhouse attendant (and admitted criminal) is enough to indict one, as well. Let's be frank: very little of what's in that report would stand up to a union appeal in the event of a suspension; less still would hold up in a court of law. And just look over that list, and what do you see? Moral reprobates who ruined our hallowed sport? The worst villains since the Black Sox? You know what I see? A list, mostly, of people who spent their whole lives trying to be major league baseball players who one day found out they just weren't good enough any more. People who only knew one way to earn a livng and one purpose to their lives, and thought that it was being taken away from them a bit too soon. They were afraid of growing old, afraid of losing their jobs, afraid of being replaced by younger, better, cheaper players. Because, evan after the abolition of the reserve clause, baseball is still largely driven by indentured servitude and underpaid labor, thanks to a government antitrust exemption. Most players, by the time they're free to reach a major payday for their talents, have already hit their decline phase. Everyone looks at the big salaries the star gets. Nobody looks at the league minimum, or the wages down in AAA, or the retirement age most of these guys face. And nobody knows what they're supposed to do when they don't have enough left in the tank to play and don't have the money to retire at 35 and don't have the education to move into a new career in middle age. This is why people like Scott Boras, whatever their faults, are not the enemy. This is why Marvin Miller deserves to be in the Hall of Fame and Bowie Kuhn deserves to rot in anonymity for the rest of time. And this is why guys like Mark Prior aren't loyal to fans like us -- because we will hate them when they're done and we will forget them when they are gone, and they still have to do something with their lives. Some of you seriously need to start shutting the hell up and you need to start doing it now, please and thank you. For all your talk of integrity and loyalty and other values, you only care for them so long as they produce for you, you turn a blind eye to their offenses while they happen, and then you judge them later for what they did so they could play for your entertainment and you gloat. It is appaling and it is hypocritical and it is wrong. And if you can't find it in your hearts to find at least some pity for some of these men, then you need to question whether you have a heart at all. And if you can't look at what you as a fan have done and are doing in this era and question your part in it... well, that's your own lookout. But I'm tired of your indignation without accountability. All of us were witnesses. We booed the players as they tried to win a larger share of the money owners were making on the backs of their labor, and we cheered the home runs they hit, and we looked away from what we didn't want to see. We are not blameless, and we are not in a position to judge.
I would suggest you learn to truly interrupt all stats before using any selective stats. -- cubswin

by cwyers on Dec 13, 2007 7:14 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

A lot of people are quick to judge...
...the players on that list. And, sure, a lot of them were expected, based on leaks from the BALCO investigation, or Jose Canseco, or other sources.

But people are ready to throw Brian Roberts under the bus just because Larry Bigbie said so. Writing a check to a clubhouse attendant (and admitted criminal) is enough to indict one, as well.

Let's be frank: very little of what's in that report would stand up to a union appeal in the event of a suspension; less still would hold up in a court of law.

And just look over that list, and what do you see? Moral reprobates who ruined our hallowed sport? The worst villains since the Black Sox?

You know what I see? A list, mostly, of people who spent their whole lives trying to be major league baseball players who one day found out they just weren't good enough any more. People who only knew one way to earn a livng and one purpose to their lives, and thought that it was being taken away from them a bit too soon.

They were afraid of growing old, afraid of losing their jobs, afraid of being replaced by younger, better, cheaper players.

Because, evan after the abolition of the reserve clause, baseball is still largely driven by indentured servitude and underpaid labor, thanks to a government antitrust exemption. Most players, by the time they're free to reach a major payday for their talents, have already hit their decline phase. Everyone looks at the big salaries the star gets. Nobody looks at the league minimum, or the wages down in AAA, or the retirement age most of these guys face. And nobody knows what they're supposed to do when they don't have enough left in the tank to play and don't have the money to retire at 35 and don't have the education to move into a new career in middle age.

This is why people like Scott Boras, whatever their faults, are not the enemy. This is why Marvin Miller deserves to be in the Hall of Fame and Bowie Kuhn deserves to rot in anonymity for the rest of time. And this is why guys like Mark Prior aren't loyal to fans like us -- because we will hate them when they're done and we will forget them when they are gone, and they still have to do something with their lives.

Some of you seriously need to start shutting the hell up and you need to start doing it now, please and thank you. For all your talk of integrity and loyalty and other values, you only care for them so long as they produce for you, you turn a blind eye to their offenses while they happen, and then you judge them later for what they did so they could play for your entertainment and you gloat. It is appaling and it is hypocritical and it is wrong.

And if you can't find it in your hearts to find at least some pity for some of these men, then you need to question whether you have a heart at all. And if you can't look at what you as a fan have done and are doing in this era and question your part in it... well, that's your own lookout. But I'm tired of your indignation without accountability. All of us were witnesses. We booed the players as they tried to win a larger share of the money owners were making on the backs of their labor, and we cheered the home runs they hit, and we looked away from what we didn't want to see.

We are not blameless, and we are not in a position to judge.

I would suggest you learn to truly interrupt all stats before using any selective stats. -- cubswin

by cwyers on Dec 13, 2007 7:15 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

agreed
and quiet frankly, besides Clemens and Pettite, most of the accusations are blurry.
Live is boring until March 31st strolls by..

by Chanman25 on Dec 13, 2007 7:22 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Excellent points
As Mitchell said, there is plenty of blame to go around in this whole debacle.  Quite honestly, I thought Mitchell did a good job in how he presented things and without supeona power, the report is pretty thorough.

Selig lost any respect I may have had left for him when he dodged the question about how Mitchell pointed out even his office should take blame.  Any good leader would recognize this happened on his watch, stand tall and say he is partly responsible.  

With that said, the players union has played hard ball from the get go, and has fought tooth and nail against testing.  They have grown accustomed to winning just about every battle against ownership over the years, but this is one they can not win, at least without harming the reputations of many of their members.  If a union is there to protect it's members, I would think they would want to clean PED's from the game as much as anyone else.  After all, there is significant medical evidence that using these substances can have serious medical consequences down the road for their members.  Bottom line, unless you have something to hide, no player should have any problem submitting to the strictest testing program possible.

I think people are concentrating too much on the Mitchell report list of names.  This was only a sample, of those identified by a handful of sources, and there are many many more players who used substances during this same time period.  Those not identified either used different sources for their stash, went out of the country and were probably just a lot more discreet in what they did compared to the guys on the list.

In the end, I do think this report will do what I think it was designed to do, force the player's assoc to agree to a more stringent/fluid testing policy.  I will say again, there is no reason for them to balk at agreeing, unless they have something to hide.  I also agree with Mitchell when he says no punishment should be handed down to players on the list.  Since MLB sat on their ass, along with the players union, it's time to move forward and show everyone both sides want to rid the game of cheaters.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Dec 13, 2007 8:24 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Well said...
.... both by you and cwyers. It will take a lot of introspection and thought by BOTH owners and players to come up with a suitable program that will:
  • satisfy both sides;
  • satisfy the fans;
  • and allow the integrity of the game to be reclaimed.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Dec 14, 2007 9:57 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Wow
Intelligence and introspection?  On BCB???

Is that allowed?

by BlueSox on Dec 14, 2007 9:41 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

What??
No Geo Soto?

< / sarcasm >

PERRY!!!!

by Goat Whisperer on Dec 13, 2007 7:20 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

LOL!!!
I was waiting for someone to mention him.
"But being a nasty hateful person she can't help herself." KOW

by sue369 on Dec 13, 2007 9:09 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Be careful....
what you wish for.....

This is only the tip of the iceberg.  Wait until the "Raw Deal" investigation results come in.

What the Mitchell Report made clear today is that you should believe your eyes and your head, not your heart.

Again, I would not be shocked if Soto were implicated.  

"You are an asshole": NDcubsfan

by timeforachange on Dec 13, 2007 10:48 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Am I missing something?
Why wouldn't you be surprised if Soto was implicated?
"In all the categories that you pay the most attention to, except the loss column, we're doing very well" - Jim Hendry

by Jayo525 on Dec 14, 2007 11:29 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I think.......
his jump in numbers is off the charts.

Up until this year, he was a career minor leaguer with average at best stats over six years.  In 2007, he exploded.

I am not saying that he is guilty.  What I am saying is that is the type of jump that raises eyebrows.  

"You are an asshole": NDcubsfan

by timeforachange on Dec 14, 2007 1:20 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

The numbers do unfortunately raise eyebrows...
and this is the problem with the PED era.  Nobody can have an emergent/resurgent year without the general public wondering if PEDs were involved.

by SouthernCub on Dec 16, 2007 8:22 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

But will any players take personal responsibility?
Publicly.

And apologize to the fans, especially to kids who hero-worship these guys, play the game and daydream about becoming a major league player someday?

Like Jason Giambi not too long ago.

Or weasel out like Bonds, et al, and throw a hissy-fit proclaiming their innocence and let their personal attorneys release 'statements' to the press, and hide behind Fehr?

God, I'd like to think some of these guys are men.

by JFCubFan on Dec 13, 2007 7:21 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Our steroid users suck!
Even as cheaters the Cubs are still losers!  LOL!

by DudeVf11 on Dec 13, 2007 7:48 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Sosa
Al, I really think you should remove Sosa's name from your list.  The report doesn't actually implicate him in PED use, though his name is mentioned as one of those who testified in Congress (as mentioned above).  


I believe that Sosa really does belong in that group of players, but I think you're misrepresenting the facts as they've been laid out in the report by including his name.  However, it's only a technicality, and I'm sure one day we'll see some evidence of his PED use.

by 60613 on Dec 13, 2007 8:29 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Agreed
The goal here is to be responsible, right?  That's why we are trying to avoid speculation. And yet by glancing at this list, any casual reader of bcb will immediately get the impression that Sammy was implicated to the same degree as many of the other players, when very clearly he was not.  

by mexicubsfan on Dec 13, 2007 8:38 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Again I agree
I was surprised to see his name on Al's list.  I had to go back and reread the report because I thought maybe I missed something.  I posted a link above to a tribune story about Sammy not being on the report .  Here it is again.

http://blogs.chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/sports_whatsgoinon/2007/12/sammy-sosa-es-1.html

by amisaid1 on Dec 13, 2007 10:57 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

one question
espn is saying derrik turnbow's name was in the report but i cant find it anywhere. anyone else see his name??
WhErE's My CuBs?!?!

by tbizzle83 on Dec 13, 2007 8:45 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

a PDF search tip:
Ctrl-F, "Turnbow", enter


Or just go to page 131.

by 60613 on Dec 13, 2007 8:52 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

thanks
alot
WhErE's My CuBs?!?!

by tbizzle83 on Dec 13, 2007 9:03 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

It is explained in the report
that Turnbow tested positive for andro use in international play i believe. At that time, andro was not yet banned from MLB, if i'm not mistaken

by philadelphiacub on Dec 13, 2007 11:51 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

This is all so pointless.
Just like our country, (both GOP and DEM) there are no adults in charge of this baseball mess who will take responsibility for anything.  

Players' lawyers barking denials.  Selig crying about there being no HGH test was beyond pathetic.  What a smarmy pile of garbage.  I am impressed that not once could I see Reinsdorf working his strings though.

We are a nation of children.  

by TR on Dec 13, 2007 9:28 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Kudos to all players not on "the list."
I agree that this has been a sad day for baseball.  But if I could take this discussion in a different direction for a moment, please allow me a few words.

Not that I'm breathing a big sigh of relief or anything, because I knew none of my childhood heroes would be on this list, but I can't even put into words how proud I am that guys I grew up rooting for like Ryne Sandberg, Andre Dawson, Mark Grace, Greg Maddux, Shawon Dunston, and Rick Sutcliffe were not only great ballplayers, but also class guys, and true professionals in every sense of the word.  Even other guys that did not play for the Cubs, but I was a big fan of and enjoyed collecting their baseball cards like Ken Griffey, Jr., Cal Ripken, Tony Gwynn, Don Mattingly, and even guys from enemy teams like Ozzie Smith and Frank Thomas.  I wish I could shake all these guys' hands and thank them for being class guys and making me love baseball.  For all the scumbags who have stained the game over the years, there are a lot more guys who are true pros, and we should take a moment from the witch hunt to give all the real ballplayers a pat on the back.  

"Don't complain to me about the stormy weather, boys. Just bring the ship into port." --Steve Stone, September 2004

by ctcoff99 on Dec 13, 2007 9:45 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

i agree
100%
WhErE's My CuBs?!?!

by tbizzle83 on Dec 13, 2007 10:09 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

NOW
can dawson get into the HOF all those injuries and still he went out there and gave 100%, put up good numbers, won the MVP, AND resisted the temptations these other losers gave into.
WhErE's My CuBs?!?!

by tbizzle83 on Dec 13, 2007 10:11 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You just know they're not on this list.
it would take years to do a comprehensive investigation to find even half the players who used performance enhancers.  That's one of the idiotic things about making these names public.  !) A lot of the "evidence" wouldn't stand up in an actual court and   2) This is the tip of the ice berg.  

It makes everyone feel good and say, "Well, thank God that's over, we got the bad guys."  What we have is a partial list consisting of people who may and may not be bad guys.  It's absurd.

by TR on Dec 14, 2007 12:13 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

We won't ever know
for sure whether some of the guys you mentioned ever did PEDs.  I'm not even finished with the report, and I can't tell you how many times I've seen the words "former player" or "Player X" or "Player A stated he did not remember specific names of persons he spoke to."  There were mentions in there of how Mitchell didn't name certain names because they were no longer in baseball.  

The bottom line is this:  Sure, there were a lot of players' names mentioned.  But we will never know how many people did or did not use PEDs, mostly because there was no testing in previous eras.  Some of that may be attributable to the clubhouse tradition of "keeping it in the family."  Or frankly, managements blatant refusal to accept responsibility for its past actions.

by jjmarie30 on Dec 14, 2007 3:51 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm sorry...
But Selig is the pivotal guy to blame here.  There is absolutley no excuse for his not taking charge 5+ years ago and kicking guys out of the league, pending any appeals to re-enter, and sending an appropriate message to any player considering using the stuff.

It's disgraceful and insulting that he chose to lay back and turn a blind eye, under the shroud of "due process," and only look to protect the game's image (for profit, of course).  He played fans of this great game like jerks.  EVERYONE and their barber knew something was going on!

Selig should resign in disgrace, and then we can finally move on.  Oh, and Roger Clemens can "go shit in his hat."

"Hey Hey, Holy Mackerel, No Doubt About It!"

by scottsdalecubs on Dec 13, 2007 9:52 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, but you can't blame Selig only.
That would be ridiculous.  The owners, the Players' Association, and the players themselves all have to share the blame.  The bottom line was, as has been pointed out many times already, everyone was making big money, and no one wanted to rock the boat.  Selig at least has tried to correct the problem, albeit much too late.  
"Don't complain to me about the stormy weather, boys. Just bring the ship into port." --Steve Stone, September 2004

by ctcoff99 on Dec 13, 2007 11:38 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Kent Merker was a juiced Cub
left off the top o the list.  I thought he just trained at the Steve Traschel/Kenny Rodgers Media School.

My friends from out of town were worried Fukudome might show up on the list.

"Trapled moss on your souls; changes all you're a part; seen it all, not at all; can't defend a (Cubs fan)"- pearl jam

by section229beer on Dec 13, 2007 10:09 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

I'd be interested
I'd be interested to see a list of the names CNBC had that weren't on the list.

I'd also be interested to see a list of those that were that CNBC didn't have.

We are all waiting for that glorious October night when we finally win it all. Until then we will continue to cheer, never do the wave and hope.

by cubstoseriesby100 on Dec 13, 2007 11:05 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Sosa not named
per ABC/ESPN's article The List of Players Named in the Mitchell Report.

Nor is Sosa listed in Yahoo's list.

Here's the *only* mention of Sosa in the Report:

Through his personal lawyer, I asked McGwire to meet with me for an interview about
these issues, but he declined to do so. I then sent his lawyer a list of specific questions about
whether McGwire had ever used steroids or other performance enhancing substances without a
prescription during his major league career, in the hope that McGwire would be willing to
provide a response outside of the context of an interview. Neither McGwire nor his lawyer
responded to that letter. (I sent similar letters with specific questions to lawyers for Barry Bonds,
Rafael Palmeiro, Sammy Sosa, and Gary Sheffield, none of whom provided answers to my
questions either.)

Report at 85 (p. 133 of the pdf) (emphasis added).

Al, you really should take him off your list.  

I'm the guy in the blue under armour shirt

by joeschmitt on Dec 14, 2007 1:37 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I concur, Al
I'm surprised you are not being more responsive to these requests.  Your naming of Sosa in this list as currently displayed is just as incorrect as those people who were speculating a few days ago about who might have been steroid users.  

For the record, I think Sammy did use steroids, but I have no evidence other than my eyes for it, and the Mitchell report does not claim it.  

Free the upper deck!

by zambranofan on Dec 14, 2007 7:13 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

"Responsive to these requests"?
What, I'm supposed to stay up all night and read comments here?

OK, that's a little snarky. However, you are correct. I got ANOTHER incorrect list. I'm going to make this right, both in editing the original list to take Sosa's name off, and in a main-page post I'm working on now.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Dec 14, 2007 9:00 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You forgot
Ismael Valdez for your list of Cubs. It was brief, but he played for Chicago.

by Scott on Dec 14, 2007 7:06 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Umm....
In your post, played should be in quotation marks.  Making 12 starts, winning 2, losing 6, an ERA of 5.37 and averaging only 5 innings per start.  Boy was that team awful.

However, looking at the 2000 player roster, I note Ismael Valdez, Rondell White, Glenallen Hill, Gary Matthews, Jr. all graced the team that year.  As though 97 losses wasn't a bad enough legacy for that team.

by N Oakley on Dec 14, 2007 8:28 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Interesting note
that all 4 of those players were implicated and played on the Cubs at the same time.
"In all the categories that you pay the most attention to, except the loss column, we're doing very well" - Jim Hendry

by Jayo525 on Dec 14, 2007 11:35 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Steroids Era
For the limited scope of this report -- and there is no other way to describe the scope of this report -- it is clear that whatever Rodomski and McNamee did, they certainly kept records of something.  I think what this report shows is that the problem was widespread and everyone at some point turned a blind eye to what was going on.

It doesn't take 1998 away from me.  I lived it and enjoyed every minute of it.  I guess it turnes out that Sosa and McGwire were both taking steroids.  The games were still played.

I just can't find a huge level of outrage about this.  You can say that records are tainted, and that is a completely valid opinion, just not one I share.  Players from every era have had advantages over players of pervious eras.  Players before 1947 didn't play against black players, does that discount Babe Ruth's accomplishments, or Walter Johnson's or Ty Cobb's?

I'd like to think that the overwhelming majority of players didn't juice, but we'll never be able to say for sure.

So I say move on, catch those you can with the testing available, and just understand that baseball will always have a "Steroids Era" like it has a "Dead Ball Era" and a "Pre-Integration Era".

by AlabamaCubFan on Dec 14, 2007 8:07 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

The list
This is even worse than I thought and I'm pretty cynical.  Even baseball-reference.com has the list of players.

The list of players is worthless.  It's a partial list of players some of which may not have even used steroids.  There are many users (probably in the 100's) not on the list.

 

by rlpete on Dec 14, 2007 8:29 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Prior
Speaking of Prior, anyone heard anything?  I hear the Astros are interested.  Link below.  Anything else?

http://mlbfleecefactor.com/2007/12/14/astros-contact-mark-prior/

by em3 on Dec 14, 2007 9:13 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

The quote in that article....
... which was linked on that "fleece" site is pretty generic. Sounds like Ed Wade kicked the tires on Prior, nothing more.

I wouldn't necessarily expect Prior to sign anywhere right away, except possibly San Diego.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Dec 14, 2007 9:18 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

san diego
yea, i agree.  san diego's rotation will be unreal with or without prior.

peavy, young, maddux, wolf, prior, germano, hensley.

not too shabby.

by em3 on Dec 14, 2007 10:59 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, and on off days they can play...
...the outfield!
I would suggest you learn to truly interrupt all stats before using any selective stats. -- cubswin

by cwyers on Dec 14, 2007 11:11 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon
Start posting about the Cubs »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Sb_small
Ask BCB - Wacky Trade Proposals
Small
Reversal of opinion...Bradley will not be moved
Yelloncard_small
Baseball Picture Puzzles Overflow 1
Derrick_rose_poster_by_rokasm_small
You know you want him, Get it done Jim!
Yelloncard_small
Baseball Player Picture Puzzles

Recent FanPosts

Small
Time to get yelled at...
Cubs_small
Cubs HR Over/Under
Cubs_ying_yang_small
OT Aged Stadiums
Small
Here's a thought
Jake_fox_small
25th Annual Cubs Convention
Bucky_small
OT: Annual Thanksgiving  Thread
Dscn2381_small
Cubs 2010 2B and "the L word"
Cubswin712_small
Is there anyway we trade some of our high-priced players?
Yelloncard_small
Milton Bradley Named NL "LVP" By Joe Posnanski

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Would you blow up the farm system for Halladay?
FanGraphs calls Grabow a "waste of cash."
Fangraphs hasn't given up on Geo, should you?
Baseball America's Top 10 Cubs Prospects
An animated tribute to the no-hitter that Pirates pitcher Dock Ellis threw on June 12, 1970. Simply...

Recent FanShots

Mike Kiley insults Wrigley and Cubs fans
Muskat on Fuld : even DUMBER than usual
Free Agency Blunders
"I Want Mark DeRosa"
White Sox Sign Vizquel To One-Year Deal
Cubs' next major hire: marketing guru
Zambrano attends Bears game
Cubs install sign boards in bleachers to block Horseshoe Casino (Budweiser) building...
This one is for you sabermetricians
A Chicagoan, Part Of Cardinals Ownership Group, Dies

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

It Is Only...

Cubs By The Numbers

Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.

Click here to order your copy, available now!

SPONSORS

Recent Stories in Ticket Exchanges

Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: Cubs Convention 2010
Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: General 2009 Ticket Exchange
Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: September 29-October 4 Homestand

Managing Editor

Yelloncard_small Al

Editorial Cartoonist

Toonmike_small toonmike

Contributors

Dsc_0139_small holy mackerel

100px-boisehawkscaplogo_small Josh77

Small shawndgoldman