Bradbury's solution to the HGH problem: legalize it
One of my favorite baseball bloggers, JC Bradbury, has an interesting article up today. He proposes that the best way to send a clear message about HGH is to remove it from the list of banned substances, since it's considered an ineffective PED by sports physiologists. By keeping it on the banned list, he reasons, you're sending a mixed message about its efficacy.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
0 recs |
7 comments
Comments
I would argue
I agree with the concern over the message you are sending young kids, and that should be a priority.
by MPH73 on Dec 20, 2007 1:02 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
it is approved....
It is prescribed in cases where children are not on a high percentile on the growth chart.
I know this because I had a family member who was 4'9" at the age of 15. He was prescribed hGH and hit two seperate growth spurts. His height is now 6'1". It improved his confidence greatly and he's doing great.
My own 8 yr. old son is a possible hGH candidate. We are holding off to see how he progresses naturally. I have NO reservation about this at all.
The problem/scare tactic lies in the old GH. This was taken from dead monkey pituitary glands. This posed problems. Then they took it from the pituitary glands from cadavers.
This is kind of 'close to home' for me and it bothers me when the media or other idiots get on their puritan soapbox and tell the 'heethens' how to live.
I commend this guy for writing the article. It gets people thinking...rather than just reacting and saying out of the box it is bad.
by MaTheMeatloaf on Dec 20, 2007 1:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
When I say healthy individuals
HGH is a pretty potent hormone. What they aren't sure of, is the long term consequences of loading the body up with excessive levels of the stuff, which your normal physiology wasn't designed for.
by MPH73 on Dec 20, 2007 2:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Right.
Somehow, I'm thinking enhancing the production of major league baseball players isn't one of those legitimate purposes.
by Al on Dec 20, 2007 2:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If that's good enough reason,
by Maddog on Dec 21, 2007 8:51 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I understand his point 1
by NO100 on Dec 20, 2007 2:21 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I think his point is
Maybe classifying it as a drug of abuse, as you suggest, or just under the blanket "don't do illegal things" clause is the answer.
by Wreckard on Dec 20, 2007 4:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 




















