Greinke Trade Talks Heating Up?
Taken from Hot Stove Cubbies:
[editor's note, by Al] As I have mentioned before, copying and pasting from another source -- whether it's ESPN.com or another blog -- is a copyright violation and not permitted here. Here's the link to the post in question. Having said that, I agree with the posters below -- there's no corroboration, no MSM link, no web link, nothing for this. I don't believe it at all.
I would go for it, seeing that he is a young pitcher with potential and our surplus of minor league infield. I think it would be a great move. What do you guys think?
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
0 recs |
36 comments
Comments
If you could get him
by rlpete on Dec 9, 2007 10:40 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Definitely interesting...
A guy like that could definitely use the proverbial "change of scenery" and a move to the DHless NL.
Why the hell not?
Especially if they do get Roberts - go ahead and move EPatt and Cedeno. Veal seems to have boatloads of potential, but who knows if that will ever materialize? He could be the next Dontrelle Willis, but is that even a big deal?
by Hugest Canadian Cubs Fan on Dec 9, 2007 10:43 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Two years ago
A lot of people say stay away from Greinke but if I pitched for the Royals, I'd be having panic attacks too
by DTJchris on Dec 9, 2007 10:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
great point.
He was a very young man in a dead town on a team with no chance to win and with no run support. He got down and started to wonder if this was for him. It's understandable.
by nickler on Dec 10, 2007 6:12 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Is it?
I know I called Greinke a "head case" before and that was uncalled for. However, clearly he has some issues. Have they been resolved? Maybe, but I'm not sure I'm willing to take the chance.
by Al on Dec 10, 2007 7:18 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
As a starter for the Royals...
Of course the Royals know that, and aren't going to give him up for cheap. But I'd certainly gamble on him, if the chance came.
by cwyers on Dec 10, 2007 9:05 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Panic attacks are different.
This is not the nature of a panic attack. Have you ever known anyone who has the real thing? I have. It's quite disconcerting to see someone go from "normal self" to hyperventilation and near-passing-out in a matter of minutes. And has little or nothing to with "issues" such as lack of run support.
It's a medical condition that lurks somewhere in the area between the psychological and the physical. And it can be absolute misery for the person so afflicted.
by MN exile on Dec 10, 2007 9:25 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Thank you
by DGU on Dec 10, 2007 11:02 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Greinke would be good.
I will not judge him and let that deter me from wanting him to be a Cub. I'm glad to see that apparently Hendry isn't either. I posted a couple days ago how the Cubs could really use another quality RH arm in the rotation and if that's all the Cubs had to give up, he'd already be a Cub by now. Which is why I highly doubt that is the asking price.
What I want to know is, when I brought up that the Cubs needed to solidify their starting rotation at the beginning of the off-season all I heard was how the Cubs had the best starting ERA etc etc etc etc but now that the Cubs are apparently of the same mindset and are actively pursuing another starter, nothing. Why is that?
by lemon20pie on Dec 10, 2007 11:02 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
My impression
The alternative is for Lou to say "You gotta get me someone who can throw the ball," and then He Who Must Not Be Read will write a column and go on a half dozen different ESPN shows saying the Cubs MUST get Johan or their off-season will be a DISASTER. Then if the Cubs do land a guy like Greinke or Edwin Jackson it will be deemed a poor substitute for Johan and maybe even a failure.
Jim Hendry has learned a few things about how to interact with the Chicago media. His stated goals for this offseason are either ones he knows he will accomplish (Lefty OF) or ones no one will care if he doesn't accomplish (speedy, lefty IF).
As for posters on this board, I've been with you saying a starter with #2/#1 upside is needed. I think the hang-up is the statistic that the Cubs ERA was the second best in the NL. The question is whether or not that statistic is a) predictive of 2008's ERA, (and it isn't) and b) relevant to winning in the post-season (and it isn't). To up the Cubs chances of winning in the postseason, they need another shut-down starter and better defense. Adding Fukudome in RF will help the latter (although not as much as getting a better defensive SS).
by DGU on Dec 10, 2007 12:19 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I really wouldn't have panic attacks
by DTJchris on Dec 10, 2007 12:36 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Greinke would be fantastic
I would trade more than Veal, Cedeno, and Patterson for him. His arm has minimal mileage on it. I hope this rumor is more than speculation.
by DGU on Dec 9, 2007 10:49 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
True...
But he just might still be bat sh!t crazy.....
by TheBeerBaron on Dec 10, 2007 8:50 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You're gonna lose me
by davidalanu on Dec 10, 2007 1:02 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Veal, Cedeno, and Patterson sound great
Veal did not perform at Double-A and Marshall, Hill, and Lilly are lefty starters. Patterson doesn't fit into our plans for OF or IF.
We do need a backup SS. That's my only concern.
by IllinoisCubs on Dec 9, 2007 11:24 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
So, in your mind Grienke is out of a
And no one is trading 3 above average prospects for a reliever....even if it's Joe Nathan.
by TheBeerBaron on Dec 10, 2007 9:02 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Wow, let's just step back from the table
Let's not get out of control here. We already have Zambrano, Lilly, Hill, and Marquis. Then you have Dempster, Marshall, Gallagher, Hart and possibly even Prior. If Grienke came over he could very well win the 5th starter job. However, if you paid some attention to the Royals last year, you know they had Grienke pitching in the bullpen and Odalis Perez and Jorge De La Rosa got more starts than Grienke did.
In fact, Grienke didn't start any games in June or July and only had a couple of starts in May or August. It's certainly possible that Grienke wouldn't find his groove right away so we would give one of our other guys a shot in the rotation because we know that Grienke can handlethe bullpen and a guy like Marshall can handle the rotation.
If you would double read something before launching a nuclear attack style post, you would see that I didn't say anything about putting him in the pen forever.
by IllinoisCubs on Dec 10, 2007 2:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah if we can get Grienke
Zambrano
Hill
Grienke
Lilly
Marquis/Dempster/Marshall/Hart/Prior
Roberts
Soto
Lee
Soriano
Ramirez
Fukudome
Theroit/DeRosa
Pie/Theriot
by Unique on Dec 10, 2007 12:46 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
For sure
by IllinoisCubs on Dec 10, 2007 1:46 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You've got Soto hitting 2nd
by lemon20pie on Dec 10, 2007 3:56 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
that struck me as odd as well.
by buckmulligan on Dec 10, 2007 4:24 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Of all time?
by BeerCub on Dec 10, 2007 12:41 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Lemme throw water on this.
I would not exactly get my hopes up here.
by cwyers on Dec 10, 2007 2:15 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
cubs.com
by lemon20pie on Dec 10, 2007 4:00 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
cubs.com/message board....that is.
by lemon20pie on Dec 10, 2007 4:02 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Rumors are what they are
As for getting Greinke, I would love to get him. He's a great talent and he seems to have things under control now. Even with some of the things that are being posted about him here, he's got a better head on his shoulders than a certain front of the rotation guy that everybody loves.
If you can trade Cedeno or Patterson for it, go for it---they don't seem to fit with the Cubs and they're pretty much blocked anyway. If you give up Veal or Marshall as part of the package, go for it---we know what to expect out of Marshall, and Veal has talent but it's questionable whether or not he'll pan out. Might as well trade a young pitcher for one with higher upside.
by JDay on Dec 10, 2007 12:11 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
The Royals could want Cedeno
I'm just not sure why they would want to part with Greinke.
by DGU on Dec 10, 2007 12:21 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
That's why I question this rumor
by rlpete on Dec 10, 2007 12:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well
I'd be in favor of putting Fukudome in CF, DeRosa in RF, trading for Roberts at 2B, and trading Pie and Marshall for Grienke.
He's that good. Believe me.
by nickler on Dec 11, 2007 10:09 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Doesn't Stevie Ire...
He had a very difficult time pitching until he received medication to take care of his affliction, and then had to find the right dosage.
by initram on Dec 10, 2007 1:07 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Jeff Weaver too.
by lemon20pie on Dec 10, 2007 2:15 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Forgive my cynicism
Anyway, I've always found the sudden rash of ADHD diagnoses to be a little suspicious. Amphetamines get banned and suddenly what happens? A bunch of players get diagnosed with a condition whose treatment consists of - you guessed it - prescription amphetamines.
by Wreckard on Dec 10, 2007 4:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't agree.
Adam LaRoche is another player with ADD.
by Al on Dec 10, 2007 5:49 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe Adam Sandler
Pete Rose had ADHD too.
by lemon20pie on Dec 10, 2007 6:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 




















