Bleed Cubbie Blue: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Cal RB Jahvid Best Seriously Injured, Carted Off Field

Who should bat second?

When looking at the Cubs' 2007 lineup, a few things can be assumed.  Alfonso Soriano is going to bat first, and the 3-6 slots will probably be filled by Derrek Lee, Aramis Ramirez, Jacque Jones, and Michael Barrett -- in that order.  The big question becomes, who is going to bat second, between Soriano and Lee?

There would seem to be four candidates, depending on the left field platoon.  Cezar Izturis and Mark DeRosa figure to be everyday players, with Matt Murton and Cliff Floyd sharing the duties in left.

Let me first say that under no circumstance should Izturis bat second.  I realize that the face he is a switch hitter makes it very tempting to put him there, but it's no secret that his offensive skills are less than spectactular.  While the chance of him putting up a Neifi-ish sub-.300 OBP seems slim, both PECOTA and ZIPS project his OBP to be around .320, and when coupled with the relatively small amount of pop in his bat, makes him a good candidate for the bottom of the order.

DeRosa will probably be a better hitter, but I am still somewhat concerned with his ability to get on base.  Remember, that second slot is important, with the heavy hitters coming up next.  I honestly think that it was the 2005 Cubs' inability to get their top of the order guys on base for Lee to drive in that cost him the MVP, and it is certain that it cost them runs.  It wouldn't upset me to have him in that spot, though, particularly if he's able to make contact and give Soriano a chance to run when he gets on base.  ZIPS thinks that his OBP will be comparable to Izturis'; PECTOA says 10-20 points higher.  Both projections could very well be wrong.  Last year was a career year for DeRosa, but he posted .296/.357/.456 line: if he can repeat those numbers, he will be more than acceptable at second base, and batting second.

The option I favor is having Matt Murton bat second, something that I haven't made much of a secret of over the last year.  His .297/.365/.444 line from last season is very close to DeRosa's numbers, except that Murton has been hitting like this his entire professional career.  His numbers have come down in the majors with increased competition, but he defied the fluke-cryers last year with a very solid season.  People question whether he will ever develop real power (13 HR in 508 ABs last year), but batting in the two hole, he's not going to be looking to drive a ton of runners home anyway.  His batting stats are likely to rise even higher with the dangerous baserunner Soriano in front of him and a healthy Derrek Lee waiting on deck.  Le's patience and ability to get on base are the marks of a good hitter, and a guy who could wind up scoring a lot of runs for the 2007 Cubs.  For what it's worth, PECOTA and ZIPS see almost the exact same batting stats for Murton as 2006.

And yes, I do realize that I have a level of man-love for Murton.  Deal with it.

The question then is what to do when Floyd is in the lineup?  He doesn't run very well, but his bat works fine.  He has more power than Murton, and while he doesn't have the long-term upside, he's probably about as valuable a player as Murton is, except he's a left-handed batter.  A platoon here makes a ton of sense, because Murton hits lefties significantly better than righties (OPS of .870 versus .782 in 2006).  Floyd's advantage over righties is even higher: in 2005 (his last healthy season) he posted an OPS of .915 against them, as opposed to .710 against left handers.  I would make the argument that the Cubs' best option against right handed starters would have Jacque Jones (.303/.358/.528 against RHP in 2006) moved into the #2 slot and Floyd batting fifth behind Ramirez.  Floyd is likely to sit out some games against righties, in which case Murton is probably better suited for the second spot in the order than Jones. Frankly, I think that it would be fine to have Murton and Floyd split time against righties, and have Floyd available off the bench .

In summation, I would favor the following starting lineups:

Vs. RHP, with Floyd in LF:
Soriano
Jones
Lee
Ramirez
Floyd
Barrett
DeRosa
Izturis

With Murton in LF:
Soriano
Murton
Lee
Ramirez
Jones
Barrett
DeRosa
Izturis

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.

0 recs  |  Comment 61 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Murton!
I agree.  

but it's no secret that his offensive skills are less than spectactular

With Izturis, that's the understatement of the year!

MCDONOUGH!

by secdelahc on Feb 10, 2007 11:12 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

He should be better this year
PECOTA has him bouncing back to his 2004 numbers with the Dodgers, which would be fine with me. .288/.330/.381  is a line he's capable of putting up again, and when coupled with the value of his glove at short makes him somebody who I'm willing to have start every day.  Izturis is still young: he'll be only 27 this year, and it's not outside of the realm of possiblity that he'll become a slightly better hitter with time.  The Cubs' new hitting coach Gerald Perry comes from the A's organization, and that means he's bringing with him a philosophy that involves working the count, waiting to take a good pitch, and the willingness to take a base on balls.  A few of the Cubs already do this, but the team as a whole should benefit from this approach.

I am particularly interested to see if Soriano will start exhibiting more patience at the plate.  If he's able to, his power and speed could very well make him worth his contract.

by gjdow on Feb 10, 2007 11:22 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Barrett
I'd like it to be Murton, but I also believe that Barrett should get some consideration.

DmL

by dmlichte on Feb 10, 2007 11:18 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

You're completely right
I left Barrett out of the equation.  My mistake.

I still think he's most likely to bat sixth, but his .307/.368/.517  line from last year would look great in front of Lee. It may also be worth moving him up to fifth behind Ramirez against left handed pitching.

by gjdow on Feb 10, 2007 11:26 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

For me...
the reason I don't like Barrett in the two-hole is because his 'lack of speed' especially as catchers tend to slow during the season.

I think Murton's speed is underrated. Not that he's a speed demon, but for next year, especially sharing time with Floyd (however much it is), I personally think he'd be much better on the basepaths than Barrett.

All that being said however, it would be interesting how much, if it all (and the 'stats guys' can say), putting Barrett in the two-hole would help his stats.

worthless...

by tyger1147 on Feb 11, 2007 1:51 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

izturis
should not be at the 8 spot that would be two easy outs. my lineup would be:
Soriano
Derosa
Ramirez
Lee
Jones
Barrett
Izturis
Murton/Floyd
With Barrett and Lee in the 4 and 6 spots to protect the more free swinging Ramirez and Jones

by roach on Feb 10, 2007 11:20 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Izturis won't be an "easy out"
I think we're conditioned by the last couple of years to see weak-hitting infielders as "easy outs", and Izturis certainly was that last year.  I do not expect him to hit as poorly as he did last year -- remember he was recovering from an injury and didn't play a full season.

But I also take issue with the idea that Murton and Floyd would be better suited batting eighth, between Iztruis and the pitcher.  They'd never see any good pitches.  Floyd in particular would be pitched around due to his power.  Even if they drew walks, they wouldn't find much success on the basepaths with the pitcher up next, especially with two outs.

Much better to bat both of them earlier in the order where their offensive talents can help score some more runs.

by gjdow on Feb 10, 2007 11:29 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Don't Forget our Hitting Pitchers
With Z or Marquis batting, it wouldn't necessarily mean an automatic pitch-around if Floyd/Murton were batting eighth.

by Luigi on Feb 11, 2007 8:24 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I like three of those spots...
The rest... they don't make sense to me. I don't get why you would put Murton/Floyd in a spot where they will get either intentionally walked or very carefully pitched around almost every single time they're up.
worthless...

by tyger1147 on Feb 11, 2007 1:47 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with Murton's batting second,
but I'm hoping that we trade Jones by July 31 and that Pie tears it up at Iowa so that he can bat first. Soriano is much more valuable in fifth spot, but I know that the Cubs want him to leadoff because of his speed.

Here is, in my opinion, "the best" lineup for the Cubs, an order that may not appear until the start of the 2008 season:

  1. Pie (RF)
  2. Murton (LF)
  3. Lee (1B)
  4. Ramirez (3B)
  5. Soriano (CF)
  6. Barrett (C)
  7. DeRosa (2B)
  8. Izturis (SS)
All we are saying... is give Pie a chance

by neonverse1 on Feb 11, 2007 12:02 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

If that lineup
stayed healthy, I'd expect about 200 RBI's from Fonzie
Los Cachorros!

by Laven on Feb 11, 2007 12:06 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

i am hoping for the same thing
but I wouldnt want to bat pie leadoff.  That might put too much pressure on him and really his skills dont seem made for that role just yet.  I think batting him in the 6-hole with barrett protecting him in the 7th slot would be perfect.  Heres to Jones' mid-season trade and Pie callup!
DON'T TRADE PIE!

by kylejo on Feb 11, 2007 12:42 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Pie's not really a leadoff guy
He's fast, but he strikes out way too much and doesn't walk enough. And that's why I'm praying Soriano shows an ability to get on base more like last year than the rest of his career, because otherwise it's the same deal but with more power.
ROTHSCHILD!

by Perkins on Feb 11, 2007 1:04 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

He doesn't......
....strike  out any more than our current lead-off guy.  It doesn't really matter, it has already been said that Soriano is batting lead-off because that is where HE wants to hit.  They won't move him from that spot this year, hopefully in another couple years as he slows down a bit they can move him near the middle of the line-up.
Here's to a new year!!

by santo for prez on Feb 11, 2007 1:39 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

True, but
He's also not as good a hitter as our current lead off guy.
ROTHSCHILD!

by Perkins on Feb 11, 2007 2:44 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

True..
n/t
Here's to a new year!!

by santo for prez on Feb 11, 2007 5:27 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Was waiting for someone to respond...
I think he won't be so bad this year.  I think Lou will light that proverbial fire under his ass, at least I hope he does.

by cubsfan2883 on Feb 11, 2007 10:59 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

absoutely insane too
 
TRAMMELL!

by Faith plus 1 on Feb 11, 2007 10:59 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Theres a reason we got hi for Maddux eh?
this should get Jess going.

I don't mind having one of these guys in the lineup. If he'd be a bit more like David Eckstein I'd be even happier. with the bat anyway he's arleady a better fielder.

but if he puts up Eckstien numbers and fieleds well I wouldn't mind having him around .

by cubsfan2883 on Feb 12, 2007 12:01 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

what exactly are you saying?
We gave up a hall of famer pitcher for him and WE got the better end of the deal?
TRAMMELL!

by Faith plus 1 on Feb 12, 2007 7:59 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

He damn well better
And in a good way. If he can put up a league average OBP around .330 or .340, maybe I'll back off of him.
ROTHSCHILD!

by Perkins on Feb 12, 2007 11:57 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Mike63-
Is that you??
MCDONOUGH!

by secdelahc on Feb 12, 2007 6:21 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Jones in the 2 hole vs RHPs?
I dont think I like that notion all that much, Id rather like to see Jones as a #6 guy Batting behind Floyd. This Way Jones would have more of an RBI chance should Aramis and Floyd get on or walked whatever.

Id rather see Barrett and Murton be your number 2 as well.

Having either one of those guys in the 2 spot forces the pitcher to go right after either of them, thus opening up Soriano to more steals.

And either one of them will be able to knock in Soriano in on a consistant basis given Soriano's speed.

I think what has really hurt the Cubs offensively is the lack of early inning runs, I remember in the 2003 playoffs they almost always scored runs early and having Soriano #1 and either Barrett or Murton 2nd will open the door for more early inning run production.

Of course im a CUBS FAN What other Chicago baseball team is there?

by Galvan316 on Feb 11, 2007 12:32 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

jones
I seriously hope to god that you are kidding about Jones hitting second.  First off he is not a good hitter, he is very impatient and strikes out way too much.  If anything keep him as the #6 hitter in the lineup

by CubsBall2202 on Feb 11, 2007 1:08 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

This is a real simple question.
Matt Murton should bat second.

However, given baseball people's tendency to go "by the book" (and it's a crappy book), Mark DeRosa likely will bat second.

I don't see Floyd platooning with Murton. He's a backup (unless Jones is traded).

"[BCB] is much better than... well, everything." -- gravedigger, January 21, 2007

by Al on Feb 11, 2007 4:22 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

"the book"
also applies here. Floyd won't be a bench player if he's healthy. Out of a healthy trio of Floyd, Jones and Murton, "the book" says Murton sits.

by JohnM on Feb 11, 2007 4:50 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Healthy...
... is the key for Floyd, of course.

And Piniella has already gone on record as saying Murton's starting.

The only conclusion we can draw from this is that Jacque Jones is likely going to be traded during spring training, if:

  • they can find a taker, and
  • they can get a decent return.
"[BCB] is much better than... well, everything." -- gravedigger, January 21, 2007

by Al on Feb 11, 2007 5:14 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

We were told last year
that Murton was our starting left fielder, also.  Yet I remember there was at stretch where he didn't start for over a week.  I'm hoping that Lou sticks to his word, but I guess I've lost some faith that Cubs management knows how to keep it.
MCDONOUGH!

by secdelahc on Feb 11, 2007 1:11 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

very different management.
i trust that will make a difference.
"[BCB] is much better than... well, everything." -- gravedigger, January 21, 2007

by Al on Feb 11, 2007 5:56 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

My kool-aid
will be getting drunk in a few days.  I will then be optimistic about management.
MCDONOUGH!

by secdelahc on Feb 11, 2007 9:01 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't see a true platoon
But the Cubs would be nuts not to use Floyd's proven ability to hit right-handed pitching.

I think that it would be best for the team if Murton got the majority of the starts -- say all against LHP and about half against RHP.  Floyd would get the rest.  This would make the Cubs a bigger offensive threat, while at the same time giving Murton more looks against righties.  He's only going to get better at the plate.

I also expect Floyd to be the first pinch hitter off the bench against righties.

by gjdow on Feb 11, 2007 5:51 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

murton
murton is a good 2nd hitter. makes contact.jones strikes out too much.barett a good choice.will probably be derosa. my choice when he plays. theriot.i cant say how much this guy impressed me last year.wonder what lou will do if theriot proves to be a better choice than derosa????play the better player or play the guy who makesmore money???? we,ll see.

by NOMAR on Feb 11, 2007 6:19 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Batting order
I don't know why we wouldn't want Murton batting between Soriano and Lee.  He had the highest batting average of any Cub last year (which, I admit, isn't saying much) and his position between two batting superstars forces the opposition to throw him tons of stuff he can hit.  I don't mind having a weaker end of the lineup in order to have a dangerous 1-5 or 1-6.  

And for the record, I'd rather see Theriot start than Izturis or DeRosa.  Theriot's approach and hustle impressed me last year and I have yet to see anything impressive about DeRosa or Izturis.  I hope they prove me wrong.

by Rev Gunia on Feb 11, 2007 7:04 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

murton
Maybe this is a stretch, but young Murton reminds me of a young Ryne Sandberg at the plate.

by deadcatbounce on Feb 11, 2007 7:25 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

If Dusty were still here...
Jose Macias would be batting in the two slot.

(please somebody laugh at that)

But anyway, I like Murton in the two slot. He's a solid, patient hitter that can get on base. But I've always been partial to having Michael Barrett batting second. I'm not really sure why, but it seems that he's more productive batting second. tyger1147 does make a good point about Barrett's speed though, so if that ever happens, it won't be a common thing.

Do you understand the words that are coming out of my mouth?

by Keith on Feb 11, 2007 7:43 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Only Neifi
Neifi is the only person who can bat second.  The two slot should be permanently retired in his honor and just skipped, like the 13th floor in hotels.  Cubs lineup cards could be printed: 1 [Neifi] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
¡BLANCO!

by 08Cubs on Feb 11, 2007 9:47 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Murton
I think Murton should hit 2nd and shouldn't be in a straight platoon with either Floyd or Jones.  I think Murton should play against LHP and should get a fair share of starts against RHP.  The key is that neither Floyd nor Jones should see the field against LHP.  I think DeRosa should play RF against lefties and Theriot should play 2B.  Theriot won't ever hit for much power, but I think his speed is legitimate and more importantly he can get on base.  

by MHef08 on Feb 11, 2007 11:45 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I agree about Murton
But Floyd is a lot better against LHP than JJ.
ROTHSCHILD!

by Perkins on Feb 11, 2007 1:02 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Good idea about DeRosa
Jones' problems against LHP are infamous, and Derosa's .342/.394/.589 line against LHP (2006 stats - even if they went down they'd be good) would make him an asset to the lineup, plus Theriot playing at second would probably give the Cubs a better lineup compared with Jones.

Against LHP, the lineup could look like this:

Soriano
Murton
Lee
Ramirez
Barrett
DeRosa
Theriot
Izturis

Yeah, it's heavily slanted towards right handed hitters, but with Jones and Floyd both available off the bench, that shouldn't cause too many problems in relief.

by gjdow on Feb 11, 2007 5:55 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Derosa
The Cubs didnt pay 15 million over 3 years, for Derosa to sit on the bench. So you can pretty much forget about having Derosa NOT start.
Of course im a CUBS FAN What other Chicago baseball team is there?

by Galvan316 on Feb 11, 2007 12:03 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

I don't agree with this.
The Cubs aren't in the position where they can play a guy for money reasons even if he's not as good as someone younger.

They are in the position, IMO, where they HAVE to play a younger, homegrown guy (Theriot) if he's 'clearly' the better player.

worthless...

by tyger1147 on Feb 11, 2007 7:36 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Just remember that Sample Size is key
Player A: 80 AB 41 GP .300/.356/.375  (BA.OBA,SLG)

Player B: 134 AB  53 GP .328/.412/.522 (BA/OBA/SLG)

Guess who player A is... a much maligned Cub figure now.

Guess who player B is...

by cubsfan2883 on Feb 11, 2007 9:00 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

how about
A: Ronnald Cedeno
B: Ryan Theriot

B's obp is 90 points higher than his BA though while A's is just 56.  Also if you look at contact ratio, and if player B is Theriot and A is Cedeno I garauntee there is a vast difference, I know Theriots was about 87% contact rate, Im interested to look up Cedenos.

DON'T TRADE PIE!

by kylejo on Feb 11, 2007 9:54 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

nope im completely wrong
somehow cedeno had an 86% contact rate to Theriots 87%, however the difference here is in the walk rate.  A true .300 hitter is supposed to make contact in 86% of his at bats in addition to walking in 11% of those at bats.  

Theriot 2006: 87% contact, 11% walk
Cedeno 2005: 86% contact, 6% walk

Just for comparison sake in 2006 Cedeno dropped to 80% and the walk rate went to an unbelievable 3%.

Ronny probably isnt as bad as he was last year because he had to be pressing way too much to walk that little.  The fact that Theriot meets the requirements some set for a true .300 hitter this year though is encouraging and even in the small sample size you can see how Cedenos avg. was bound to drop as he just doesnt walk enough.

DON'T TRADE PIE!

by kylejo on Feb 11, 2007 10:06 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Indeed, but that was not the problem
the problem was that the sample size was too small to come up with a legitimate breakthrough.. something I warned about last year.. Something I worry about with Theriot this year, I love the kid his work-ethic, and his desire to play the game of baseball.. But I worry sometimes, if you over expose him to 400 + Ab's you won't like the results.

by cubsfan2883 on Feb 11, 2007 10:20 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

true
we wont know until this season and maybe the season after that if theriot really is a true .300 .380 type of guy, but when you look closely at the numbers even in cedenos good looking 2005 you can see signs of him coming back to life in 2006 that you DONT see in theriots 2006 numbers.
DON'T TRADE PIE!

by kylejo on Feb 11, 2007 10:57 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I think none of this will happen...speculation
I take hendry at his word in that the Cubs are not done yet.

There are two big FA's out there in that area the Cubs need; RF or SS

My choice is Ichiro whom the Mariners are going to shop each day ST goes right through July. Talk has stated that the Mariners might be interested in Jones, Gallagher and PTBNL. (This could be Murton or possibly two minor league prospects possibly Patterson & Marshall, but not Pie).

What would Ichiro do but make the Cubs the best offensive team in baseball. In that scenerio Floyd is the starting LF'er but DeRosa becomes the defensive replacement in LF or platoons against RHP'ers

The other player available is AROD who will seek to option out of his contract and be a FA next year.  The cost might be more in players and $$.

The other given is not, but I could see DeRosa platooning either in the OF or at SS
(unless Cubs acquire AROD) because I think Theriot will earn a starting spot at 2B.

Because of Theriot's emergence he will be the lead off hitter allowing the Cubs to move Soriano down to #3 spot allowing Ramirez to be the clean up and Lee the #5 hitter.

Any case this is premature until the roster is set.

Best Harry moment: 'Hey there's Marla without her shorts on!'

by Ivy Walls on Feb 11, 2007 3:55 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

just wondering
where did you hear that the mariners were shopping ichiro and where did you find those possible trade combos?  I dont doubt you, just wondering.  That all makes sense too, as the Cubs dont need either Patterson or Gallagher and both of those guys would be sought after prospects.  Gosh, how amazing would it be to get Ichiro, bat him second...its too good to be true: Soriano - Ichiro - D Lee - Aramis
DON'T TRADE PIE!

by kylejo on Feb 11, 2007 4:02 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I would say either...
Murton or Floyd as both are capable of getting OB, although Murton should be given more ABs in my opinion.

I am not convinced that Derosa is a starter, so if the Cubs are willing to hitch their wagon to him then I'd offer Theriot as an alternative.  Derosa's a proven sub., versatile player but I'd like to see them give Theriot playing time as well.  Oh, and our SS can't hit or get on base so maybe Theriot can get some more ABs playing both 2B and SS?

by DudeVf11 on Feb 11, 2007 4:10 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Will Ohman...
should bat second.  Always.

UZI

"We don't make mistakes here, we just have happy accidents. Everything is possible here. This is your little universe." - Bob Ross

by Ozgreeder on Feb 11, 2007 9:58 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Murton
Oh wait, I said that already.
HENDRY!

by cubbiejulie on Feb 12, 2007 12:12 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Are you up working hard like me?
I really am working hard.

Back to my work...

"I don't talk. I just let what I do talk for myself." -Johan Santana

by sparkles721 on Feb 12, 2007 12:16 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

No
I can't sleep so I'm up screwing around.
HENDRY!

by cubbiejulie on Feb 12, 2007 12:29 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Another thing to consider
is trying to put high OBP guys at the end of the line up, (and hopefully speed guys too), so that Soriano can be used as a "second" clean up spot.

I don't know if that makes sense. But what I'm trying to say it that considering Soriano's power it would be nice to have some guys on base in front of him when he comes up to bat. The only problem with this is that the pitcher spot usually is an automatic out and if some one ws on in front of the pitcher spot it could lead to alot of DP's.

I know this type of line up construction is unconventional, and I'll probably get flamed for it, but what do you guys think about:

1)Soriano
2)Derosa, Theriot
3)Lee
4)Ramirez
5)Murton
6)Izturis
7)Barrett
8)Jones
9)Pitcher

The pitcher spot is what really messes up this order. But there could be the potential for guys on base for Soriano.

THE FONZ HAS ARRIVED!

by amaru on Feb 12, 2007 12:35 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Miguel Cabrera
No questions.
Los Cachorros!

by Laven on Feb 13, 2007 12:01 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon
Start posting about the Cubs »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Chicagocubs1914_small
OT: Big-Ten, Vista-Demolition, Bad-News-Bears, Anything-Goes-on-a-Weekend Game Thread
Jake_fox_small
Cubs Should Go After Rich Hill
Chicagocubs1914_small
Last Out to First Pitch – The 2009-10 Offseason IT'S HAPPENING!!!??? Contest
Small
More From the Cubs in Winter Ball
Small
Don't Make the Mistake of Dumping Bradley

Recent FanPosts

P272649reg_small
OT: How will the Big Ten wind up and who goes where?
Small
Should we trade him, or should we not?
Madduxflag_small
Starlin Castro Vitters etc LIVE Sat night
Helmet_small
Az Fall League Cubs
4167bqf31ml
Five tool player available!
Self-portrait-4_small
This Might Be A Long Shot...
Madduxflag_small
Convention Sold Out
P272649reg_small
OT: Why not name a field after Ernie?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Gomez to drink your Brew, Hardy to eat your Twinkie
BP interviews Sam Fuld. Great read!
Who was the best MLB player born on your birthday?
Gary Matthews Jr.
Kerry Wood Says Black Players Got Hate Mail

Recent FanShots

Happy Birthday, Al!
Chicago Cubs Headlines for Monday (Chicago Now)
Not a rumor, Bruce Miles speculates on a Bradley trade with good return
OT: Lidge to have surgery
OT, sexist and imho funny
J.J Putz's Option Declined by Mets.
Does Soriano's defense at 2B really cost more runs than in LF?  He makes a lot fewer errors in LF since misplays and mental mistakes aren't figured into the stats, but I have to imagine that his mistakes are more physical at 2B.  Any thoughts?  Is there a statistic on this?
Sosa pays tribute to Michael Jackson?
Harden, Johnson File For Free Agency
Brett Myers released by the Phillies

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

It Is Only...

Cubs By The Numbers

Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.

Click here to order your copy, available now!

SPONSORS

Recent Stories in Ticket Exchanges

Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: Cubs Convention 2010
Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: General 2009 Ticket Exchange
Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: September 29-October 4 Homestand

Managing Editor

Yelloncard_small Al

Editorial Cartoonist

Toonmike_small toonmike

Contributors

Dsc_0139_small holy mackerel

100px-boisehawkscaplogo_small Josh77

Small shawndgoldman