Z Update: It's Not Looking Good
Bruce Miles has the update on Z and the upcoming arbitration.
Minutes earlier, Hendry and Zambrano met for 2-3 minutes on one of the practice fields, with Hendry doing a lot of hand gesturing.
With it appearing the two sides had failed to strike an agreement on a one-year contract, the stage was set for an arbitration hearing at 3 p.m. Chicago time today at a Phoenix hotel. The hearing would be the first for the Cubs since 1993, when they went to an arbitration hearing with first baseman Mark Grace.
Zambrano is seeking $15.5 million for 2007, and the Cubs are offering $11.025 million. Last season, when Zambrano went 16-7 with a 3.41 ERA, he made $6.5 million.
There was still a chance the two sides could settle their differences, even up to the minutes before the hearing starts. The Cubs do not wish to settle at the midpoint number because they feel Zambrano's side has filed much too high at $15.5 million. The arbitration panel must choose one number or the other.
Chad, I might need that mai tai sooner than we thought.
Discuss.
127 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This dosent look good
Because
Hendry screwed up giving Lilly and Marquis so much. Based on what they got, he's going to lose this arbitration. What's worse, he's going to have to say a lot of bad things to Z's face in the process, and that is going to make a long-term deal nearly impossible to get with someone as emotional as Carlos.
Bad move, Jim. Bad moves all around.
While I agree...
Even Zito's 2007 salary is (reportedly) around $10 million.
by audiospeedwagon on Feb 20, 2007 2:56 PM CST up reply actions
Totally agree Julie..
Plus, plus..what if (God forbid) something were to happen to Z physically this year? Then he would have really screwed himself..
DUring the year last year...
Kasey
I still believe...
One of the bad things about arbitration is that the arbitrator has no leeway between the two offers -- it's one or the other. It'd be far better if they could rule that there's an appropriate figure in between.
15 mil. is an unprecedented number
Soriano
Is that the benchmark, though?
Yet another reason I think arbitrators should be allowed to choose a figure in between the club figure and the player figure.
I see bad things
Zambrano Lose Hearing
Is it a high number, you bet. But the Cubs have so low balled Zambrano that they have to lose. And the only thing that one can think is that the Cubs fully expect to lose him next year and are trying to sully his reputation so they don't look as bad.
by frustratedfan on Feb 20, 2007 3:09 PM CST up reply actions
No, that's one of the good things
by DaveinHouston on Feb 20, 2007 2:36 PM CST up reply actions
Congrats, Hendry
You know what?
Do you think this means the Cubs lose Z? Do you think in ANY way this means they can't or won't reach a longterm agreement before Opening Day?
I like you, but your constant negativity is beginning to wear on me.
Come now Al
I really should have said what I really do believe - they will get this done. For some reason I just cannot explain, I still like that GM of ours, and I think he'll not only somehow avoid arbitration, but also sign Z to a very decent deal.
That make you happy? :)
Better.
Checked and read
I agreed with you the first time
I don't, because...
I can't blame Zambrano for this...
Dude
Dee dee deee.
And what was Hendry's justification? "He won 20 games in the last two years!"
Good point, Jim. If he won 20 games in one year, I might care.
Please don't tell me
Anyways, to stay on topic...
If we don't sign Z to a long term deal, this really, really tempers all of my enthusiasm for the money we spent.
Mencia is a
by nextyearcub on Feb 20, 2007 3:01 PM CST up reply actions
instead of stealing
allow me to say voluminous extended clapping to you Julie, captain my captain
but i agree Carlos Mencia is a very very unfunny man. Astrid laughed at him the other day and i almost filed papers
by ksucubbie on Feb 20, 2007 2:20 PM CST up reply actions
I f*cking...
UZI
by Ozgreeder on Feb 20, 2007 3:06 PM CST up reply actions
man, what are you talking about?
Because my...
UZI
by Ozgreeder on Feb 20, 2007 4:00 PM CST up reply actions
I'm glad you said that
Have you guys seen
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nEH8H5BqWg
by nextyearcub on Feb 20, 2007 3:30 PM CST up reply actions
I have no problem signing Marquis to multi year
Now a 3 year deal for 6 million total I would not be complaining but a 3 year 21 million dollar deal. Who else was going to offer him even half that amount per year?
If a deal can't be made..
this is a mistake
OR perhaps this is a real indication that we arent nearly as close to a long term deal as we have been led to believe
by ksucubbie on Feb 20, 2007 1:32 PM CST reply actions
or the Angels
You know...
But if the Angels would give those four, I'd do it.
Fact is, the Angels are almost as hard to deal with as Tampa Bay is. Even if they wanted Z, they'd never agree to give enough value for him.
I think it's time to stop hyperventilating and recognize that there are still five weeks to opening day, plenty of time to come to a longterm agreement.
I'm a huge Z fan also
Thank you
And...
anything
by ksucubbie on Feb 20, 2007 1:42 PM CST up reply actions
She won't...
Which is fine with me!
Bruce
by ksucubbie on Feb 20, 2007 1:50 PM CST up reply actions
And what hand gestures did Carlos give Jim?
if i were
by ksucubbie on Feb 20, 2007 1:59 PM CST up reply actions
Brief Blurb
FWIW
DmL
That...
Frankly...
The Cubs should not want to go to Arbitration for a few reasons. First off, no matter what Zambrano says, he is going to take it personally. How could you not? Arbitration hearings are not pleasant and the Cubs should want to avoid this. Further, while no one is pining to have Andy MacPhail back, the Cubs front office doesn't want to give the fans a reason to want him back. If they screw up the first big arbitration case post MacPhail after a very clear philosophy and track record, it will not reflect well on Hendry and McDonough.
DmL
Z and personal pride
I actually think that the agents are in a no lose situation, they get 8% of 11M or 15M and then if he gets pissed and goes FA they get 8% of $135 instead of $95
All About Image.
big z
Panic
These things always seem to go down to the wire. I'm not saying it will get done but I'm surely not in panic mode yet.
Loud, sustained applause!
let's
Aramis is here because he wanted to be. He took very signifigant discount and it had nothing to do with Jim Hendry or the Cubs FO.
Carlos Zambrano is a different person and if he doesnt want to be treated like Roy Oswalt Hendry should respect that and pay him like Carlos Zambrano deserves to be paid.
by ksucubbie on Feb 20, 2007 2:30 PM CST up reply actions
aramis also
aramis
the guy was 28 entering his prime at a weak market position in a crazy market
by ksucubbie on Feb 20, 2007 3:20 PM CST up reply actions
wrong
carlos lee and soriano
My point is, Aramis signed for a 4 mil a year raise, that's a lot. He also will be up for free agency now in time for another big contract, coincidence?
No. The deal here is that Soriano and Lee opted for longer contracts because they are older. Of course the total dollar amount is substantially more because the years are longer. The amount per year is not very different, that is what I was saying. Aramis got a contract to his liking, got a big raise, and will be due for another big pay day when this contract is over. So dont just disagree with me to disagree with me.
I guess we'll see
We'll see Zambo and his guys might feel it's a win-win either way. If he signs lower now Jim will make it up in the long term.
it's pointless to freak out like that
Indeed....
UZI
by Ozgreeder on Feb 20, 2007 3:10 PM CST up reply actions
Arbitration isn't the end of the world
I'm on Zambrano's side
By the way, I've been a long time reader enjoy everyone's commentary. Just figured I'd finally put in my 2 cents.
Exactly
the only thing
if it goes to arbitration, Z will lose. there is no question about this. he asked for a ridiculous figure, and when you do that in an arbitraiton hearing, you guarantee you won't win.
z's agents set this up to be a contentious negotation by asking what they did. i don't think hendry will budge on the one-year deal, because it would cause too many problems in the future. his only hope is to either get carlos signed to a long-term before the hearing, or to get him to agree to something around 11 or 12 for this year with a good-faith promise to get something long-term worked out.
and sorry again about messing up the draft date.
Looks like I picked the wrong week to stop drinkin
My heart has a hard enough time during, the season, let alone all this drama before it even starts.
I don't agree with the doom and gloomers
He pitched fewer innings than the year before. He walked more men than the year before. Had a higher ERA and WHIP than the year before. And still, the Cubs are offering him an almost 5 million dollar raise.
This is negotiating with a player already under contract, which is completely different than and independent of the free agent market. Z will have his chance to cash in as a free agent, and he certainly will. However, if I'm the one making the decision and I see that, as fine a year as he had, he actually had a worse year last year than the previous and he's getting a 5 million raise and asking for 9 million, I give the 5 and tell him to be happy.
by Scott @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Feb 20, 2007 2:54 PM CST reply actions
If using your logic
My guess
Well barring any last minute
by ksucubbie on Feb 20, 2007 3:00 PM CST reply actions
for 5 mil or 9 mil....?
Check Hendry's EKG for me please!!!
Anyone else
it's loaded with dominic rhodes
stupid dominic rhodes.
Possible news
"ESPN 1000 reporting they are only 200K apart and the hearing may not have started yet.
12.3 and 12.5"
The what's the deal? 200K? Bend!!
Maybe they are.
It'd be nice if they did, though.
If that happened
by nextyearcub on Feb 20, 2007 3:39 PM CST up reply actions
That what I was talking about
Not a good sign. If they can't get a deal done when they are $200k apart, there are some strong, unyeilding egos at work.
Arbitration
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/cs-070220cubszambrano,1,930185.story?coll=chi-sportstop-hed
Are you sure?
I believe you though. It's just this really went up to the last second.
Apparently...
DmL
You can always settle
And...
Negotiations are NOT always easy, they often go back and forth over the smallest things.
This is a great relief to know that Z is signed for an agreed-upon amount between the parties, and not an arbitration-enforced figure (whether the team's or Z's).
Now, Jim Hendry, get to work on that multiyear deal!
Yes
DmL
FOX Sports.com
Ya...
DmL
OK
Cubs.com
They confirm that a deal has been reached, however it just appears as though the first paragraph in the previous story was changed. I assume a new story will be posted shortly.
DmL
Internet faux pas to change posted stories
I think it's bad form to take reported news and then cover all record of previously reported news.
correction
"they are trying to treat their story section and" ...should read... "they are trying to treat their story section as a news ticker and"
HE SIGNED!!!
Sounds good
Wait 5yr
by ksucubbie on Feb 20, 2007 4:24 PM CST reply actions
has to be
by ksucubbie on Feb 20, 2007 4:26 PM CST up reply actions
We will...
UZI
by Ozgreeder on Feb 20, 2007 4:29 PM CST up reply actions
You'll have to take care of yourselves
One year
Still, I wouldn't be surprised at all if we hear in the next few days or weeks that Z has signed a long-term deal.
Dawson
Can't believe the cheapness of the Cubs back then. The guy had just won MVP with 49 homers, playing for a paltry salary of around $500,000. And what do the Cubs do? Take him to aribitration over a lousy $150,000? It's surprising he stayed with the team as long as he did considering management's attitude.
Not that this has anything to do with Zambrano.
Apples to Oranges
And this was the Cubs under Jim Frey and an entire different slew of folks at TribCo. This has nothing to do with how the Cubs are managed today.
DmL
Of course
Still, I think you over-estimate the value of $150,000 back then.
Salaries
I don't believe that I'm overrating the value of $150,000 from 1988 in today's baseball dollars.
DmL
And...
DmL
185k in 1988
Sort of proves my point
Not at all
A $150,000 difference in 1988 is not the paltry difference that you seem to believe that it is. Furthermore, what does that mean today when it is an entirely different front office?
DmL
well
i think you are both right and wrong.
that 150k or 180k 20 years ago would equate to a much bigger difference today. if you think of it this way, it represented about 10 or 15 percent of his salary. since a good slugger these days is going to fetch 10-15 mil per year, that would equate to a difference in close to 2 million dollars in today's market.
however, the amount of money they were off had a fixed value in that day, so i don't think you can compare that amount relative to today's market, you have to compare it relative to today's dollar value. 180k then, as i mentioned, is worth 320k now. so its not as big a difference as dml suggested.
regardless, it is a different management now so i'm not sure why we're even talking about it. i guess its because its either talk about that or talk about diary hijacking/julie being threatened.
lastly, how come whenever there is a gap between the sides, people always say its management being cheap by not closing the gap, and not the player being greedy by going lower on their demand?
Not 5 Years
OK everyone......
As I said, these frequently go down to the wire. My guess is that both sides knew they were going to get a deal done and they were just playing chicken to see what the final number was.
I'm also sure that if Zambrano is looking for a reasonable long-term deal, it will get done. Of course, reasonable is debatable.
Kudos to you and Al.
by deadcatbounce on Feb 20, 2007 5:23 PM CST up reply actions
OK, first step down....
Second memo is to one Carrie Muskat: "Carrie, if you post one more 'article' on Cubs.com in which you begin with one piece of new information, and then cut and paste the rest of it from your last three 'articles', you need to be canned on the spot. There is no need to read the same quotes four different times." Jeez, and this lady actually has enough credentials as a journalist to vote for the Hall of Fame.
O RLY?
haha
Z: Carlos Zambrano will leave you after this year.
JH: No, you won't, how does 12.3 sound?
Z: Sounds like you need to pay Carlos Zambrano more money
JH: you're breaking my balls here Carlos... Cmon don't you know I have heart problems.. but I'm still here for you Carlos.... 12.4.
Z: You're getting closer. Carlos Zambrano likes you. Big Z, likes your organization, and the fact that you finally signed someone who can score runs for me, You know that I hit more Homeruns than you got out of the SS position all year last year. Cedeno 6 in 534 AB's. I mean you may as well had played me at SS on my off-days.
JH: Heyyy man that's a great idea, hey can you play any CF ?
Z: Only if you give me 12.5 mil.
JH: Done deal.
Z: Yay Carlos is rich. bwahahhaha.

by 


















