Mea Culpa. Mea Maxima Culpa.
That's cliché Latin, of course, but it's the best I can do, because I am typing this post with one hand while trying to remove my foot from my mouth with the other.
I have many times at this site said that if I were wrong about something I would freely admit it. Just a couple of examples: I was wrong about Greg Maddux not being traded at the deadline last year; and I wrote quite a long post finally giving up my support for Dusty Baker, long after I should have.
And wow, have I been wrong this past week, and I wanted to say so, and let each and every one of you know, so that we can get this community back to being the great place that each and every one of you has helped make it.
Here it is: I was wrong. I take the blame. I ask you to read and think and forgive.
I've been called a dictator at times, and while I think that's a little over-the-top, I have heard from some of you that I was too heavy-handed last week in addressing the community guidelines. That's the last thing I want for this site. In going back and re-reading the offending comments, and thinking about how I handled that situation, I'll admit that you guys have a point. I should have handled that situation differently, and as you will see below, in the future, I pledge to you that I will.
That said, I felt that things such as hijacking of diaries, and all the various comments and diaries about the nuts and bolts of the site, took away from our mission here -- which is to enjoy baseball and the Cubs and, when appropriate, other things, too, and have fun. I was concerned that we were getting away from that, and am still concerned about it; again I give you a pledge that I will deal with it more effectively in the future, and one thing all of you can do is help me in that effort, and I have in fact had some help already, particularly in putting together this post, and for that, I am deeply grateful. (You know who you are!)
A blog is a living organism in many ways, particularly when it's set up the way BCB is, with free and open commenting, and incidentally, SBNation is within the next few months going to roll out a vastly improved commenting system (as well as some other upgrades) which I think all of you will like. Head on over to the SB Nation University of Nebraska site Corn Nation to see a bit (and that's far from everything -- stay tuned for more announcements) of what this is going to be all about. (One of the best things is going to be an auto-refreshing comment system, which will make the game threads a lot faster and hopefully, more fun.)
I'm digressing, so let me get to the point. If any of you -- anyone -- thinks that I have been too dictatorial, too smothering, too picky, too patrolling, too stifling, then you are right, and I have been wrong. I may be the oldest blogger at SBNation, but that doesn't mean I can't learn a valuable lesson and change.
As you know, I've set up community guidelines here, and have been accused of "censorship" as a result. The guidelines were not and are not supposed to "censor"; all they are supposed to accomplish is to keep a level of civil discussion among people who can get quite passionate about their positions, as well as keep the diary system from degenerating into 1500 different diaries on "Jason Marquis sucks!" I admit to all of you today that I may have been too heavy-handed in attempting to stick to these guidelines, and I'm going to stop doing that. Period. No excuses, no loopholes, I'm just going to stop. As such, I have tweaked the guidelines a bit, and I encourage all of you to check them out if you haven't lately, or not at all.
So today I invite each and every one of you -- yes, you, you the ones who are apparently voluntarily staying away, because yes, I noticed the silence here yesterday too -- to come back, to post freely, about anything and everything. I note that has already begun today, and I'm glad to see that. Diary hijacking? Well, I think I overreacted. Please feel free, and I mean that. All I ask are two things:
- please, no name-calling. There are ways to criticize another poster's post without calling him or her a "moron".
- try to keep the profanity level down. I don't mind the occasional "fuck", or even "fuckwit". But we do have kids reading BCB -- mine, for one.
Baseball games start this Thursday! I'll have an open thread posted that day. C'mon back, everyone, and I mean everyone.
0 recs |
194
comments
Comments
Is Julie
by Laven on Feb 25, 2007 1:38 PM CST 0 recs
Good question.
by Al on
Feb 25, 2007 1:39 PM CST
up
0 recs
Al,
What makes this site so great is the diversity of all the people who do/don't post here. I assume that once the season begins, there will be more talk of baseball and not as much of the off topics that find their way here.
I for one, and probably speak for others, miss Julie. As I emailed you, she is a great represenative of this site. I hope she continues to post here.
Most of us are adults here. The community guidelines shouldn't even need to be brought up. We all learned at an early age, "sticks and stones.."
I for one appreciate the work you do here. And I enjoy the insight others give. I hope that people will continue making this site what it is: The best Cub's blog there is.
by fuzzycubfan on Feb 25, 2007 1:38 PM CST 0 recs
Thanks for this...
by Al on
Feb 25, 2007 1:40 PM CST
up
0 recs
Yeah, Al, you really have done a great job...
Don't be too hard on yourself, brother. You were just trying to keep BCB cool. It's been a great blog since my first visit, it continues to great blog, and it will continue to be so.
by Mark H on
Feb 25, 2007 9:58 PM CST
up
0 recs
It's fine
What I wasn't fine with was the reaction posts that attacked people /Julie wasn't okay.
Julie left. That's fine. She has that right.
by cubsfan2883 on Feb 25, 2007 1:52 PM CST 0 recs
The nature of blogs
I realize that these days, on the balance, people are coming here for the non-baseball stuff. On the balance, threads over the past few weeks that are of non-baseball nature get much more attention than baseball threads. I believe that there has been plenty of baseball to talk about, but people have been drawn to the daily non-baseball thread and other hijacked threads. The problem is that this is just one of the steps towards this becoming the next Cubs.com fan forum. Don't understand what I mean? Go check it out.
It seems to me that there is a nature of blogs where there is an endeavor into the personal, which ultimately leads to, well, what we've seen over the past few weeks. I've seen this occur on other sports blogs. I've seen this occur on outdoor blogs. I've seen it occur on TV show blogs. It seems to be that this happens a little less on usenet and, in part, I think thats because of the "owner nature" of blogs. This is a site that Al runs and we all have decided to post on his site, but its his. And when you have a site with an ultimate person at the top I think that lends itself to a dynamic where lots of things happen as we've seen this past few weeks. This is not about Al at all, this is just what I've seen happen on pretty much every blog that I've seen. There are fights, people take sides, splinter groups...
I'm kind of jumping around here, and I'll leave it at this. As long as I'm not being told what to think about my baseball point of view, I don't believe that Al has done anything wrong. If people decide to leave, thats their choice. But when someone announces their departure, then ten threads sprout up for their return, this becomes even less about baseball and the Cubs and sends it further down the slippery slope towards Cubs.com (and no, this is not a slight towards Julie). I don't know how one regulates the personal nature of a blog, and I know I wouldn't want to have to do that, but I think everyone needs to really consider how that ultimately impacts a blog and its ultimate mission.
DmL
by dmlichte on Feb 25, 2007 1:54 PM CST 0 recs
Just to make clear
It was the creator of this blog that started the original "I support Julie" diary, not anyone else. It was only afterwards that people started to jump on the boat, changing their sigs, etc. All a little much, and I think the overkill might have been one reason she pushed herself away. Not saying that anyone is wrong, just stating the facts.
That being said, Al, thanks for owning up. And congrats to Julie for starting her own blog. It looks good. And I'm sure there's plenty of room to talk about Cubs, etc. on various sites.
by nextyearcub on
Feb 25, 2007 2:01 PM CST
up
0 recs
When I started my first blog...
Here, I have kept it mostly Cub-centric, with the occasional movie review or other pop-culture post. I certainly don't mind other posts here, because it has kept people coming, and one of the reasons for the top 100 series, was to keep people as focused as possible on baseball during the long off-season.
In the end, this is my site, but yours too, because of the diary system and the open commenting system. All I've asked for is some civility, and I'm going to do better in being more open to various viewpoints.
by Al on
Feb 25, 2007 2:04 PM CST
up
0 recs
I don't think...
That said, cwyers has done a good job combining news into one thread, but (and this is no swipe at you, swyers - I appreciate your effort) I do wonder if combining all of the news into one thread ends up minimizing discussion? Who knows.
Again, as I keep saying, I think that when baseball comes around, so will the posters.
by gravedigger on
Feb 25, 2007 2:05 PM CST
up
0 recs
Some of the other....
If there's something REALLY big happening, I'll cover it in a front page post. On days like the last few, I think doing it this way is a nice way of getting all the info in one place.
by Al on
Feb 25, 2007 2:19 PM CST
up
0 recs
What is "hijacking of threads"?
This is a good site to me. From the previous issues that came up with other posters where the dispute was amde public it sounds like AL did a good job to me. Being the keeper of the bloog you can't please everyone. Stick to your guns, listen to people, and make decisions. Even the best MLB hitters are "wrong" most of the time.
Overall, this is a great site. I do miss Mike63, I thought he was just edgy enough on the guidleines to keep it stirred up. But I am sure someone will step up to the plate in his place.
by DudeVf11 on
Feb 25, 2007 3:29 PM CST
up
0 recs
I hate off seasons
Thankfully, games start up very soon and we can all get back to what we do best - Making fun of St Louis, Proclaiming this is the year (March-June), and wallowing in our own misery (July-October).
Except this year, it IS the Year so we can have fun all the way to October :)
by sanantonecub on Feb 25, 2007 1:57 PM CST 0 recs
BCB has made it......and another thought
Secondly, I wanted to post something about Julie. I miss her and her daily column. Julie, if your reading this, come back! You're one of us. I clicked on your link but nothing came up. I hope to read you soon. You have evolved as much as this site and are as much of a bleedcubbiebluer as anyone. (I think I've invented a new word and from now on this sold be how we all refer to ourselves: bleedcubbiebluer!)
by mrcubsfan on Feb 25, 2007 2:12 PM CST 0 recs
Wow!
I should point out that I did not write the Anson profile -- though it was posted under my user name. That was written by Mike, BCB cartoonist, and I'd like to say right here I think it was his finest work.
by Al on
Feb 25, 2007 2:20 PM CST
up
0 recs
Spreading the word
by mrcubsfan on
Feb 25, 2007 2:23 PM CST
up
0 recs
yeah, the 100 cubs thing was cool
by buckmulligan on
Feb 25, 2007 2:39 PM CST
up
0 recs
That is really cool
by sue369 on
Feb 25, 2007 4:00 PM CST
up
0 recs
I ended up here
Offseason, I have very little interaction with the blog because it serves little purpose for me personally. It does for others and that's fine. But I don't find any positive value in wading through hundreds of posts about things that mean next to nothing to me.
My hope is that when baseball resumes, the diaires focused upon baseball don't get hijacked by some who feel that because they can, they will. There are too many great fans with substantive information that I'd love to read. If the diaries start to become so bloated with irrelevant self posturers, I know I'll be less inclined to stay active.
by tharr on Feb 25, 2007 2:30 PM CST 0 recs
I do want open forums here...
There's room for all of it here.
by Al on
Feb 25, 2007 2:33 PM CST
up
0 recs
Al
by relaxal on Feb 25, 2007 2:34 PM CST 0 recs
yes, exactly
by buckmulligan on
Feb 25, 2007 2:41 PM CST
up
0 recs
I Agree
It did have the reality tv show feel to it. I grew weary of it.
by BJ Simpson on
Feb 25, 2007 8:01 PM CST
up
0 recs
Spirited baseball debate....
by Al on
Feb 25, 2007 8:31 PM CST
up
0 recs
Sorry to disappoint you.
by gravedigger on
Feb 25, 2007 3:24 PM CST
up
0 recs
That guy may not read this, gd
And I agree that one of your first posts shouldn't be used to chastize others.
by nextyearcub on
Feb 25, 2007 3:34 PM CST
up
0 recs
Waaaaaaaa!!!!!!!
UZI
by Ozgreeder on
Feb 25, 2007 3:56 PM CST
up
0 recs
Come on............
by tville on
Feb 26, 2007 12:08 AM CST
up
0 recs
Right-On!
by DudeVf11 on
Feb 25, 2007 3:33 PM CST
up
0 recs
It's not that faceless.
I'm not and adult quite yet, but I feel I behave like one. It's really not that hard.
by sparkles721 on
Feb 25, 2007 3:59 PM CST
up
0 recs
Well said, and...
by Al on
Feb 25, 2007 4:03 PM CST
up
0 recs
It is tough
Al you do great work, and 98% of the inputs from others are done with respect and thought.
Lets play Ball, and have a great year. And Cubs, please knock in some runs with runners in scoring position and less than two outs.
by Johnny Callison was a Cub on
Feb 25, 2007 7:15 PM CST
up
0 recs
So
by wild bill on Feb 25, 2007 3:06 PM CST 0 recs
Al
In the past few months this site has changed. Not for the good or the bad necessarily, but in tone and context regarding baseball. If people don't care for this they can choose to go elsewhere.
To Julie, I don't agree with everything you wrote, but don't run and hide over the few who cannot see past trying to run a forum that all will enjoy. Come back because Cubs fans like yourself make this a better place.
Chill out people. We have a really good thing here.
by socalbob on Feb 25, 2007 3:13 PM CST 0 recs
Thank you.
As I said... Thursday is March 1. The Cubs will be playing a baseball game that day -- hooray! Time to discuss baseball.
by Al on
Feb 25, 2007 3:22 PM CST
up
0 recs
Amen
Keep your chin up Al. Thanks for all you do.
by socalbob on
Feb 25, 2007 3:31 PM CST
up
0 recs
Al, hold your head up boss ..
I for one appreciate the fact that you've put that focus into BCB. Seriously. You ain't no control freak when you press that button and you got my support. Now I also don't mind the occasional off topic diary, but dear God, the madness and inanity it sometimes descended into was a pain in the neck to have to sort through. I'm not a Cub fan so I can booze it up and chase the proverbial Trixies up and down Clark Street - I'm here for the Cubs, the game and because I love the team and I dig being around people who do likewise and want to see the Cubs finally become what they can be and SHOULD be .. world champions.
(and if some of them want to get wasted and wobble down Wrigleyville with a vomit encrusted jersey chasing some nubile young thing in a sundress, that's their thing. It's not mine anymore - I've been married for 13 years and haven't drank for 26. We like it.)
Don't be too hard on yourself. Being anal about some things makes life better in the long run - it depends what the anality focuses on. Although I've only been contributing here for the past year or so, I've mostly read and in so doing, think you are doing a great job in keeping this board from descending into juvenile lunacy. Thanks.
P.S. - Now's a good time to use those pictures I sent you .. doncha think? (shameless plug) I asked my brothers to figure out who was who .. none of us could ..
by cubnational on Feb 25, 2007 3:37 PM CST 0 recs
Remind me...
by Al on
Feb 25, 2007 4:02 PM CST
up
0 recs
Our suggested feature .. "Name The CUB"
by cubnational on
Feb 25, 2007 9:01 PM CST
up
0 recs
Ups and downs
by LT on Feb 25, 2007 3:38 PM CST 0 recs
Not sure why Al needs to apoligize...
Go Cubs.
by bergs55 on Feb 25, 2007 3:48 PM CST 0 recs
Were we just called riff raff?
by gravedigger on
Feb 25, 2007 4:04 PM CST
up
0 recs
Yup
FYI: Some of us like baseball and other things. Some of us simply like baseball. Both are fine ways to go.
by nextyearcub on
Feb 25, 2007 4:08 PM CST
up
0 recs
I prefer...
UZI
by Ozgreeder on
Feb 25, 2007 4:14 PM CST
up
0 recs
Here.

by Al on
Feb 25, 2007 4:11 PM CST
up
0 recs
Personally,
UZI
by Ozgreeder on
Feb 25, 2007 4:12 PM CST
up
0 recs
And I...
by gravedigger on
Feb 25, 2007 4:15 PM CST
up
0 recs
Yet I...
by secdelahc on
Feb 25, 2007 7:06 PM CST
up
0 recs
I enjoy
by sue369 on Feb 25, 2007 4:07 PM CST 0 recs
Probably the most
by secdelahc on
Feb 25, 2007 7:07 PM CST
up
0 recs
Me
My reading of this site during the off-season has lessoned, not because of the drama, but because I don't need to necessarily read what five songs people have on their Ipod, or what cool Simpson trivia there is. If I need a break, I might read it in passing, but it is not what I come here for. I am interested in the Cubs, notes on the Cubs, stats on the Cubs. Everything else is secondary.
This is a neat place. A place to thumb our noses at the folks at MLB who I am quite sure are trying to figure out a way to charge us for the ability to talk about our favorite team. Once the season begins anew, this will mostly be forgotten as we kvetch about missed cutoffs, grooved fastballs, and Larry Rothschild.
by Ross on Feb 25, 2007 4:09 PM CST 0 recs
I'll never forget this whopper...
- Sox 99 regular season wins
- Sox Sweep the World Series!
by DrCrawdad on Feb 25, 2007 4:13 PM CST 0 recs
Sigh.
Now, a question for you: On December 14, 2004, knowing only what you knew on that date, how many wins would YOU have predicted the 2005 White Sox would have?
by Al on
Feb 25, 2007 4:16 PM CST
up
0 recs
More than 70
IF I went made such a bold slam on the Cubs, say I said, "McPhail is an idiot. The Cubs will be lucky to win 70 games in '07." You can be sure that my Cubs fan friends would never let me forget that statement, IF the Cubs went on to win 99 games and then win the World Series.
On this snowy day my five year old daughter pulled out the Sox '05 World Series DVDs. Just watched Konerko's game 2 grand slam. How sweet it (still) is...
by DrCrawdad on
Feb 25, 2007 4:23 PM CST
up
0 recs
Well...
But if you could guarantee me a 99-win season and a World Championship, by all means, go ahead and predict 70 wins for the Cubs in '07. :)
by Al on
Feb 25, 2007 4:27 PM CST
up
0 recs
Meant Hendry
I hope and expect in my heart that each season my favorite team will get to the World Series and hopefully win it. For all but one year they've flopped.
As I said though, if I were to slam the Cubs GM and boastfully say that the Cubs wouldn't win 70 games and then just the opposite happened every Cub fan who heard it would make sure I'd hear about it. And I'd expect to never hear the end of it from Cub fans I converse with.
You didn't merely say the Sox were going to be not be good. You slammed the Sox GM. You slammed the Sox. You were dreadfully wrong.
I hoped that the Sox AND Cubs would get to the World Series last year for a rematch of the 1906 World Series. Oh well...
by DrCrawdad on
Feb 25, 2007 4:45 PM CST
up
0 recs
One of the things..
Every year there will be at least one, and usually several teams that far exceed any and all expectations. Despite all the "expert" pre-season prognostications, including those that include attempts to catch lightning in a bottle by making trendy picks of underdog teams, there is sure to be a team that will inexplicably fool all the experts.
You can also count on a team or teams that will surprise by being substantially worse than anyone anticipated. The 2006 Cubs would fall into this category.
Al is no different than anyone else, except that he follows it more closely and likely has a more informed opinion than most. He is just as prone to be taken by surprise by a team that plays either substantially above or below the generally held expectations. That was certainly the case with the 2005 White Sox and it is what makes it fun.
by jazzman56 on
Feb 25, 2007 5:18 PM CST
up
0 recs
I agree...
I reread my previous post. I'm not angry at all.
Best wishes to my Cub fan friends at the start of our favorite sports season!
by DrCrawdad on
Feb 25, 2007 5:33 PM CST
up
0 recs
Well...
He did somethings, but not as much as I think he could have.
by sparkles721 on
Feb 25, 2007 4:28 PM CST
up
0 recs
Love the site
Just want to thank you for all the work you put into the site. It is always a good read, even in the winter. I won't comment on all the other stuff because I usually stick to the main page. Keep up the good work!
by northofwrigley on Feb 25, 2007 4:19 PM CST 0 recs
I'm glad..
While I don't typically enjoy reading a bunch of nonsense in threads....I don't see the need to stop them. I have learned that when a thread starts to get "hijacked", all you have to do is ignore those comments since they are usually replies to off-based comments.
One thing that I will say I was frustrated with (and why I have refrained from posting as of late), is that I saw a lot of hypocracy and cliques. It seems that certain people feel that it is okay to hijack a thread as long as it is in their choice of topics however, if they are not interested then they complain about it.
Al, you know that I absolutely love this site and it was so great when I was deployed. To have a place to go and talk about our beloved Cubs while being stationed in one of the worst places in the world was wonderful. Even though I have not posted much as of late, I still visit the site more than 10 times a day to read your diaries and posts of everyone involved.
I thank you for the time and effort that you put into this site, as well as your input (which I value as very well-informed information). Keep up the good work!
by santo for prez on Feb 25, 2007 4:26 PM CST 0 recs
I don't really see the problem...
However, I do not have enough time to read and comment on each and every diary/thread. I do not understand why Julie left and consider her second in contribution to this site only to Al. Also, I do not completely understand what "hijacking" a diary means; I posted yesterday on a MLB player with Crohn's Disease - is that considered "hijacking" because it is not Cubs' related? Maybe someone can answer these two questions for me.
Finally, I think this website needs no real administration comments like this one by Al - the users are competent enough to know those that are unruly users need to be dealt with - THEN administration can kick them off/decide what to do.
You are doing nothing wrong, Al; in fact you are the reason this is the best Cubs site on the internet. Thanks.
Dan
by dtpollitt on Feb 25, 2007 4:28 PM CST 0 recs
Your diary on Crohn's disease....
Now, say, if someone had taken your diary and started talking about potted plants, that is what "hijacking" is. Sometimes that's fun and interesting, sometimes not.
Many people have posted non-Cub or non-baseball related diaries. That's OK, within reason -- I only ask that you put "OT" -- for "off topic" -- in the title.
by Al on
Feb 25, 2007 4:33 PM CST
up
0 recs
Now I know what to do...
Dan


