2007 Major League Baseball Predictions
It begins tonight.
OK, so it's only the Mets and Cardinals, but it is regular season baseball, on ESPN2 at 7 pm CT, and I, along with many of you, will be watching, and waiting for our team to begin its season tomorrow afternoon.
With that, it is time for me to join all the thousands of other bloggers, websites, pundits, etc. in making my so-called "expert" predictions for the upcoming season.
If you have been here for the last two years, you'll find this prediction format familiar -- and yes, you'll find a lot of this text familiar too (copy/paste being a wonderful tool!). For those of you new to BCB, read on.
I started this format about fifteen years ago, when I was passing out my annual predictions to any of my friends who were willing to read them either with or without scoffing, because I found it both more interesting and challenging to do than traditional predictions. Even more so, if you're here I don't need to insult your intelligence by telling you who the ballclubs' best hitters, pitchers, etc. are. You already know. Instead, you'll find a pithy word or phrase describing the hitting, pitching, defense and intangibles of the thirty contenders for October glory.
I'm also not going to "predict" award winners. How hard would it be for me to sit here clacking away on a keyboard and be master-of-the-obvious by telling you that Albert Pujols is the best player in the NL and that Johan Santana is the best pitcher in the AL? And besides, awards often come out of nowhere. A year ago, who'd have thought Freddy Sanchez would win the NL batting title in 2006? Or that Ryan Howard would hit 58 home runs? Nobody, that's who.
And in any case, anyone using the search function here can come back here in October and tell me how wrong I was.
With that, here goes:
NATIONAL LEAGUE EAST
1) PHILADELPHIA PHILLIES
Hitting: Tons
Pitching: Not so many tons
Defense: Good
Intangibles: Winners almost by default
2) NEW YORK METS
Hitting: Power, power everywhere
Pitching: Injured
Defense: Excellent
Intangibles: Will find it hard to win without Pedro
3) ATLANTA BRAVES
Hitting: Improving
Pitching: Patchwork
Defense: Adequate
Intangibles: Dwindling fan base will quit if they don't win
4) FLORIDA MARLINS
Hitting: Young
Pitching: Younger
Defense: Youngest
Intangibles: Spiffy new manager
5) WASHINGTON NATIONALS
Hitting: Absent
Pitching: Wait till next year
Defense: In that ballpark? Who cares?
Intangibles: Wait till next year
NATIONAL LEAGUE CENTRAL
1) CHICAGO CUBS
Hitting: Majorly improved
Pitching: Um, well, we hope it's improved
Defense: Look out, Alfonso!
Intangibles: Lou Piniella may will them to win
2) MILWAUKEE BREWERS
Hitting: Acceptable
Pitching: Pray for Ben Sheets' health
Defense: Excellent
Intangibles: Could be the 2006 Tigers of 2007
3) ST. LOUIS CARDINALS
Hitting: Injured
Pitching: Wing & a prayer
Defense: Good
Intangibles: Trying to recreate the 2002 Angels magic
4) HOUSTON ASTROS
Hitting: A big positive
Pitching: A big negative
Defense: Creaky
Intangibles: Could go around disguised as the Diamondbacks
5) CINCINNATI REDS
Hitting: Me Adam Dunn. Me hit home runs. Grrrr!
Pitching: Good last year, but...
Defense: Injured
Intangibles: Spiffy retro uniforms
6) PITTSBURGH PIRATES
Hitting: Better than you'd think
Pitching: Um, not better than you'd think
Defense: Mediocre
Intangibles: Really nice stadium
NATIONAL LEAGUE WEST
1) ARIZONA DIAMONDBACKS
Hitting: Young!
Pitching: Exciting!
Defense: Young and exciting!
Intangibles: Spiffy new uniforms
2) SAN DIEGO PADRES (Wild Card)
Hitting: Brotherly
Pitching: Old. And young. And experienced.
Defense: Missing
Intangibles: Greg Maddux
3) LOS ANGELES DODGERS
Hitting: Inconsistent
Pitching: A pitcher named "Penny". Is that anything like "A Boy Named Sue"?
Defense: Brittle
Intangibles: Vin Scully
4) COLORADO ROCKIES
Hitting: Power, power everywhere
Pitching: In THAT ballpark? WAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Defense: Does it matter?
Intangibles: Lovely view of the Rocky Mountains beyond LF
5) SAN FRANCISCO GIANTS
Hitting: Old
Pitching: Older
Defense: Oldest
Intangibles: A team with no direction
AMERICAN LEAGUE EAST
1) BOSTON RED SOX
Hitting: Lots of home runs! Fun!
Pitching: Lots of home runs! Not so much fun!
Defense: Who needs defense?
Intangibles: The Fenway Faithful
2) TORONTO BLUE JAYS
Hitting: Under contract
Pitching: Good bullpen, and they're going to need it
Defense: Bouncy
Intangibles: One of these days...
3) NEW YORK YANKEES
Hitting: A bit long in the tooth
Pitching: A mess
Defense: Spotty
Intangibles: Joe Torre wishes he had retired last year
4) TAMPA BAY DEVIL RAYS
Hitting: Growing up
Pitching: Young
Defense: In that stadium?
Intangibles: At last, out of last
5) BALTIMORE ORIOLES
Hitting: We need hitters?
Pitching: Wait, we need pitchers too?
Defense: Does it really matter?
Intangibles: Six ex-Cubs on 25-man roster. Nuff said
AMERICAN LEAGUE CENTRAL
1) CLEVELAND INDIANS
Hitting: Outstanding
Pitching: See Cardinals comment
Defense: Good
Intangibles: Something to prove
2) MINNESOTA TWINS (Wild Card)
Hitting: Always find a way
Pitching: Santana and pray
Defense: Adequate
Intangibles: Ron Gardenhire knows how to win
3) DETROIT TIGERS
Hitting: Power-laden
Pitching: Playoff-experienced. Well, sort of
Defense: Work in progress
Intangibles: Playoff-experienced. Well, sort of
4) CHICAGO WHITE SOX
Hitting: Growing older
Pitching: Unpredictable
Defense: Excellent
Intangibles: Watch Ozzie's head explode! Fun!
5) KANSAS CITY ROYALS
Hitting: Inexperienced
Pitching: Who ARE these guys?
Defense: Who needs defense?
Intangibles: Really, really nice guys
AMERICAN LEAGUE WEST
1) LOS ANGELES ANGELS OF YOU-KNOW-WHERE
Hitting: Outstanding
Pitching: Excellent
Defense: Unquestioned
Intangibles: Who needs them? Best team in the AL
2) OAKLAND ATHLETICS
Hitting: Always competitive
Pitching: Better than advertised
Defense: Um, well...
Intangibles: Todd Walker?
3) TEXAS RANGERS
Hitting: In decline
Pitching: Pitchers? We need pitchers?
Defense: Acceptable
Intangibles: Sammy Sosa?
4) SEATTLE MARINERS
Hitting: Inconsistent
Pitching: Almost legal drinking age
Defense: Ichiro!
Intangibles: Can't finish lower than fourth
NL: Cubs over Padres, Diamondbacks over Phillies; Cubs over Diamondbacks in NLCS
AL: Angels over Indians, Twins over Red Sox; Angels over Twins in ALCS
World Series: Cubs over Angels. Because why would I pick the Cubs to make the postseason and NOT win it all... and, well -- WHY NOT US???
0 recs |
41 comments
Comments
Why not us?
I mean..
"...we're gonna win here."
Enough said.
by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Apr 1, 2007 11:51 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I love your optimism, Al!
by dfrancon on Apr 1, 2007 11:53 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Yup!!
Last year I had the Cubs losing 100 games. This year I have them winning 88. I like this turnaround! I feel good about this year, and I'm glad for that feeling. Plus I get to start teaching my 3 month old daughter all about life, which is baseball!
by Floyd on Apr 1, 2007 11:56 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Hmmm....
On the Angels- so far this Spring, they ARE that good. Garret Anderson is healthy, and is now once again the hitter behind Guerrero they need. HGH or no HGH, Little Sarge has been pretty damn good in center as well. They're deep enough in starters to field two passable rotations, and their relievers are even better. And their bench players could be starters on many other teams. They're a Scioscia-tough N.L. team in the wussy A.L.
If Floyd can play a passable left field, a lineup that has Soriano, Lee, Ramirez, Jones, Floyd and Barrett is awfully tough to pitch around. Even without Floyd, Murton really is no slouch. When he's on the bench, Floyd will always have to be in the back of an opposing manager's mind late in the game, and the same for Ward to only a slightly lesser degree. The Cubs are either going win a lot of 9-7 games or lose a lot of them. Either way, it should make for an exciting summer.
by BeerCub on Apr 1, 2007 1:11 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Reds Preview
Hey! Me resemble that remark.
PS- Grrr!
by Adam Dunn on Apr 1, 2007 1:21 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I think it will be like this...
Phillies
Braves(Wild Card)
Mets
Marlins
Nationals
NL Central:
Cubs
Brewers
Cardinals
Reds
Astros
Pirates
NL West:
Diamondbacks
San Diego
Giants
Rockies
AL East:
Red Sox
Yankees
Blue Jays
Orioles
Devil Rays
AL Central:
Indians
Twins(Wild Card)
Tigers
White Sox
Royals
AL West:
Oakland
Angels
Texas Rangers
NL Pennant: Cubs
AL Pennant: Oakland
Champs!:*
*I'm not brave enough to predict the World Series Winner yet.
by sparkles721 on Apr 1, 2007 1:32 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I love how...
by sparkles721 on Apr 1, 2007 1:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't worry about the Mariners.
by Al on Apr 2, 2007 4:08 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like your
Their pitching, however, is "outstanding." They've got six starters (Colon will be back before May 1) and a strong, deep bullpen. Lackey could win the Cy Young if Johan Santana comes back to Earth. They may have the best pitching staff in the majors.
by Josh77 on Apr 1, 2007 1:33 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Al
by danimal15 on Apr 1, 2007 1:35 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
It's blue...
by Floyd on Apr 1, 2007 2:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
haha I loved the..
by Chanman25 on Apr 1, 2007 2:00 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The Associated Press
I was wondering if they had been hibernating for the last 5 months.
The WS will be a classic: Cubs v. Red Sox...Cubs in 7!!!!
by tcjhawk on Apr 1, 2007 2:04 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I don't get it
Let's hope that Piniella and the rest of the ball-club go out and prove them wrong (and Al right), starting tomorrow.
by SuperContext on Apr 1, 2007 2:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I refuse to pick against the Cardinals
by Peoria Matt on Apr 1, 2007 2:04 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I hate this
And I haven't even bought any gifts yet.
by Josh77 on Apr 1, 2007 2:16 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
May I suggest some gifts?
ESPN Magazine issue for week of 10/17 : Headline
"Yankees Fire Cashman, A -Rod walks, Pettite retires after
90 loss season." Sub Headline "Cubs celebrate World Series
Win"
and perhaps a stylish ThunderMatt bright red wig which will become the fastest selling Cubs WS item after "Orange Guy" shocks everyone by hitting .460 in the post season putting him a head of D. Lee ( .425) A-Ram (.380) and a slumping Soriano who bats only .305 but makes up for it by stealing a record 15 bases which is especially remarkable given that all 3 post season series are swept by the Cubs so he does it in 11 games.
I am sure there will be a full selection of other overpriced Cubs WS merchansise at Cubs.com
FYI I MUCH prefer blue lemonade to Kool-Aid, that stuff is way to sweet
by jessica on Apr 1, 2007 3:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Central Division...
by rbarnold on Apr 1, 2007 2:30 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I hear ya...
by TexasCubbieFan on Apr 1, 2007 3:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow..
by wicubfan on Apr 1, 2007 3:48 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
A bit off-topic
A good game thus far, but one thing put it over the top for me.
I played a few games with Zambrano pitching and Hill pitching. Then I decided to play a game with Prior starting. He was untouchable for the first 7 batters, the 8th batter came up got a base hit and Prior got hurt and I had to bring a relief pitcher in! How realistic is this game??? I am still laughing at how funny that was. Anyways, I just thought I'd share.
by eamuscatuli1881 on Apr 1, 2007 7:02 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
In Los Angeles
by SamFels on Apr 1, 2007 7:10 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I have this gut feeling
Something just strikes me with the team I saw in Mesa.
It's hard to pinpoint it exactly and from reading what AL and others who went to Mesa have said I'm not alone in this.
by kerrysotherwife on Apr 1, 2007 7:22 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm going to make a crazy prediction
Michael Barrett.
by kerrysotherwife on Apr 1, 2007 7:23 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Not so crazy
by danimal15 on Apr 1, 2007 9:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Carpenter
by wicubfan on Apr 1, 2007 8:12 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Rangers and Padres
NEW YORK METS
PHILADELPHIA PHILLIES
WASHINGTON NATIONALS
ATLANTA BRAVES
FLORIDA MARLINS
NATIONAL LEAGUE CENTRAL
MILWAUKEE BREWERS
ST. LOUIS CARDINALS
CINCINNATI REDS
HOUSTON ASTROS
CHICAGO CUBS
PITTSBURGH PIRATES
NATIONAL LEAGUE WEST
SAN DIEGO PADRES
LOS ANGELES DODGERS (Wild Card)
ARIZONA DIAMONDBACKS
COLORADO ROCKIES
SAN FRANCISCO GIANTS
AMERICAN LEAGUE EAST
BOSTON RED SOX
TORONTO BLUE JAYS
BALTIMORE ORIOLES
TAMPA BAY DEVIL RAYS
NEW YORK YANKEES
AMERICAN LEAGUE CENTRAL
CHICAGO WHITE SOX
CLEVELAND INDIANS
MINNESOTA TWINS
KANSAS CITY ROYALS
DETROIT TIGERS
AMERICAN LEAGUE WEST
TEXAS RANGERS
OAKLAND A's (Wild Card)
CALIFORNIA ANGELS
TEXAS RANGERS
SEATTLE MARINERS
NL
Dodgers over Phils
Padres over Brewers
Dodgers over Padres
AL
Chicago over Oakland
Texas over Boston
Texas over Chicago
Texas over Padres
(Sammy Sosa comeback player of the year and third in MVP)
by frustratedfan on Apr 1, 2007 8:55 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Which one are you?
by eamuscatuli1881 on Apr 1, 2007 9:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
truth be told
by danimal15 on Apr 1, 2007 9:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Brewers Defense
Rickie Weeks, Prince Fielder, Bill Hall are error machines. Kevin Mench in LF is baaadddd. That was my main gripe with this.
by miltowncubbie on Apr 1, 2007 10:15 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
You know
I stopped doing it fairly recently. With all the evidence (polls, canvassing etc.) I can come up with something that makes sense. But there are always some intangibles. You can only know so much about what might happen in the relatively far future. Baseball and politics are similar, in that one week can seem like an eternity and whatever numbers you might have to back up your position, things can change drastically on all fronts.
Working for a candidate can be just as difficult as coaching a baseball team, I would guess. You can tell them what it is they probably should do. They won't always do it. And if they do it, and they lose, that may not mean your advice was wrong. If they win, that still doesn't mean your advice was right. Whatever happens, somebody gets the credit, deserved or not.
I love my work and I love baseball.
phat
by phatass on Apr 1, 2007 11:43 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
One other thing
People like certain things, even if they don't work.
phat
by phatass on Apr 1, 2007 11:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Here I go:
- Phillies
- Mets (Wild Card)
- Braves
- Marlins
- Nationals (Worst Team in baseball award)
- Cubs
- Cardinals
- Brewers
- Astros
- Reds
- Pirates
- Dodgers
- Padres
- D-Backs
- Giants
- Rockies
- Red Sox
- Yankees (Wild Card)
- Blue Jays
- Orioles
- Devil Rays
- Tigers
- Indians
- White Sox
- Twins
- Royals
- Angels
- A's
- Rangers
- Mariners
by Mark H on Apr 2, 2007 1:31 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Re
- NYM
- PHI (WC)
- ATL
- FLA
- WAS
- CHC
- CIN
- MIL
- STL
- HOU
- PIT
- SDP
- ARZ
- LAD
- COL
- SFG
- BOS
- TOR
- NYB
- BAL
- TBD
- CLE
- DET
- MIN
- CHW
- KCR
- LAA
- OAK (WC)
- TEX
- SEA
Phillies over the Padres
Cubs over the Phillies
Angels over the Indians
Red Sox over the A's
Angels over the Red Sox
It's opening day - Cubs over the Angels in seven at Wrigley.
Visit The Digital Gazette
by Jed Taylor on Apr 2, 2007 6:18 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The Angels
Also, I will predict right now that as a whole, TExas's rotation will be better than the Cub's this year (using Park-neutral metrics, of course).
by FirebatM3 on Apr 2, 2007 11:22 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Mine is ridiculously long.... predictions I mean
Phillies
Mets - Wild Card
Marlins
Braves
Nationals
NL W
Padres
Dodgers
Diamondbacks
Giants
Rockies
NL C
Astros *
Cubs
Brewers
Cardinals
Reds
Pirates
AL E
Red Sox
Yankees - Wild Card
Blue Jays
Devil Rays
Orioles
AL W
Angels
Athletics
Rangers
Mariners
AL C
Tigers
Indians
Twins
White Sox
Kansas City
Ok so I'll explain:
NL E:
Phillies are too good of an all around team to not win their division. They'll hit almost as well as the Mets, and pitch the pants off of 'em. Not that their pitching is great, but it'll be good enough to improve on an already solid '06 to put them over the top.
Mets have too much offense to not make the playoffs. They are basically the same team as last year, with the determination after being bumped by the Cardinals. Pedro will be back in the second half, and they'll stay in the race long enough to clinch the wild card.
Marlins are good and getting better, if the division was weaker they could probably make a run at it, but they'll probably be a serious contender in '09. Maybe '08 if someone breaks out this year (pitching wise).
Braves, did they really improve? Jones will do well in his contract year, and they'll probably be competitive for serious stretches, but their lack of greatness in any area will wear down on the team and they will falter.
Nationals.... moving on.
NL W
This was ridiculously hard for me to call. 4 of these teams are easily contenders for the division. The wild card will definitely not be coming from the NL W, seeing as these 4 will all finish with records around .500, and I expect both the Mets and the Phillies to win 88-90+. The winner of the NL W will probably have 85-88 wins. In the end I ended up picking who I thought would be overall the healthiest, as in a division as tied up as it is, injuries seem likely to be a deciding factor.
Padres pitching seems like they have one of the better rotations right now, and their bullpen seems solid. Offense isn't great, but will be enough to get the job done. After scrubbing out of the playoffs last year, they definitely got a little better.
Dodgers were my initial pick for the division, seeing as they appear to have the most pitching. But they are a little older than I would like, and their best offensive threat is Nomar, who is unfortunately going to be on the DL or bench (to help avoid the DL) for at least 30 or 40 games. They can hit, and they can run, but they can't mash... which will be an asset when they're at home, but will hurt them in the long run.
Diamondbacks will win the division in '08, probably anyways. I really wanted to pick them, and they are pretty young so injuries are less of a worry for them in what will surely be tight race. But with the youth comes a lot of taking lumps and unproven commodities. They very well could mature this year and take the division. But I think one more year of growing up, and one more offseason of picking up a piece of the puzzle before they get back to October.
Giants well, I was going with who would stay healthy... somehow the Giants made it to the bottom of that list... I don't know why. Bonds will stop caring once he breaks the record (DAMNIT), and age will keep the team out of serious contention come August.
Rockies aren't going anywhere for a little while.
NL C
This was probably tougher for me than the NL W was, which was really tough. I like the Cubs this year, I really do. We just don't have a history of playing up to expectations and we don't have a dominant enough 25 to overcome that. I think we'll win 85ish, but unless some team chemistry really starts to click and guys up and down the order learn to have consistently solid at bats, and have good OBP, we'll still be station to station once the Spring hot bats cool down and come back to earth, and we'll be waiting for the 3 run blast just like always. Granted those blasts will come fairly often this year, but it's too hard to rest a playoff berth on that. Pitching could come through... but Marquis as our number 3... yeesh.
Astros I put a * by them because I think their season hinders on how they do in April. If they do well in April and into early May, Clemens may come back to them, and if he does, I don't see how they falter (unless Lidge is atrocious again). Their rotation becomes pretty darn good, especially for this division. And their lineup is much improved over last year. And they always seem to play well and make huge pushes in August.
Cubs could win this division if Lou has as big of an effect as we all hope he will. If he and Perry get our guys to take pitches for the better part of the year, and He and Larry can get something passable out of Marquis.. we become favorites. This division is really too close to call right now, and I'm really exciting for the season and want the Cubs to win bad... I'm just trying to be objective as possible. That being said we can hit and I like our offensive depth... but even if we make the playoffs, our outfield defense may catch up to us. That is of course unless Pie comes up and one of our lefty OF is moved (I vote for Ward, I'd Rather have Jones), then OF defense is a much smaller issue.
Brewers everybody seems to be picking these guys, so I guess I'm jumping on the bandwagon. Their rotation, while it's not going to light the world ablaze, is very solid. If sheets stays healthy they could be really good.
Cardinals why can't we have Duncan as a pitching coach? I actually think their rotation will be ok, not good, but ok. They'll probably pick up another reclamation project or two midseason, and Duncan will have a decent rotation after the ASB after he works his magic. But with health problems with CF and RF, and their bullpen, especially with Reyes and Wainright in the rotation, is extremely weak. Age will catch up to Edmonds, and Rolen is on the slight decline. They always seem to find a way to win, so I'm not writing them off entirely, but I don't see them repeating this year.
Reds I can't believe I've seen some SI predictions for the Reds to win the division. They'll be OK, but they got worse over the course of last season, and not much has changed. Harang and Arroyo are good, and some of their lineup can flat out hit... but bullpen? Starters 3,4,5? I feel a little bad for Narron, he made all those moves and look what happened.
Pirates could actually be decent by like '09 or '10. They have a very respectable lineup, but after Duke their pitching is not good. If they can save up some cash and splurge on one or two free agents over the next few seasons, they could be contenders for a few minutes...
AL E
Red Sox 3 good starters at the front of the rotation, an OK bullpen, and a scary lineup. Their defense is solid enough, even with carrying 2 DHs (Manny). Barring serious injury they should squeak out just ahead of the Yankees.
Yankees old but good. Probably one of the last years of the current configuration, these guys are getting to the point where they'll no longer be effective. Still that is a very intimidating offense, and their rotation can only be better after last year.
Blue Jays I know very little about them but they've been able to tread water in this division which gives me no reason to believe they'll go belly up right now.
Devil Rays kids are gonna start getting better before they get to the point when Tampa can't afford them anymore. They'll still be whipping boys but less so than the Orioles.
Orioles again I know very little, but the Cubs junkyard is hardly going to be competitive in the AL E.
AL W
Angels their pitching seems too good in that division to not take it, and it's not like they have an anemic offense.
Athletics find ways to win and it's not like the Rangers or Mariners are big threats
Rangers will be interesting to follow because of Sammy Sosa. Other than that it doesn't seem like they did anything to improve the team, although they will bring in some extra cash.
Mariners poor Ichiro. At least, for his sake, this will be his last year there.
AL C
Tigers did not get to the World Series and be humiliated just to curl up and die now. They have a far superior Starting Rotation than the rest of the division. The hitting may not be as solid. But they have enough to support their Starting Arms and their fantastic Pen.
Indians got a little better while the White Sox and the Twins got worse. Offensively potent, if their bullpen holds up they could give Detroit a good race.
Twins always manage to play well, but after what happened to their rotation it might not matter. They'll still be good, that lineup is scary and that bullpen is too. If their rotation comes through after Santana they could be contenders, but probably more likely in '08.
White Sox are getting older and their rotation somehow seems to be in shambles. The bullpen seems OK at best. Their Offense and Defense are still great, which will win them games. But pitching will be their downfall. Too bad for them, as their thunderous bats are getting too old for this.
Royals why did we let Grudz walk? I was really made when we kept Walker over him. He always seemed to come through in the clutch and wasn't a defensive liability. I'd feel better with him at 2B than DeRosa (although I'm fine with him), good offensive production, great number 2 hitter, and good place holder for Eric Patterson. I spent this whole space alotted for the Royals talking about Grudz and the Cubs... which speaks volumes about their and 'Ace' Gil Meche's chances this year. Although I really wish we got Meche to be our number 3, I'd feel a whole let better about our chances.
This was ridiculously, ridiculously long. But I enjoyed it. Maybe someone will actually read it.
by WittyUserName on Apr 3, 2007 1:40 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
NL Central
The Cardinals will win the division again. Yes, they only won 83 games in the regular season last year en route to their 10th World Series championship. But consider all that went wrong for them last year.
Edmonds suffered post-concussion syndrome after bonking his skull off the warning track at Comiskey Park in late June, didn't hit in the second half, and didn't play at all in September.
Eckstein got kicked in the head in Pittsburgh around the All-star Break, suffering a concussion of his own, and didn't hit at all in the second half.
Rolen's should was deteriorating all season, as predicted, and his hitting fell off steadily throughout the season.
Encarnacion sucked all season. Molina hit even worse than Cardinals fans had come to expect him to hit.
Second base was a rotating door, with Hector Luna, Aaron Miles and Ronnie Belliard taking turns sucking throughout the season.
Mulder was terrible in his last few starts before being lost for the season in June to rotator cuff surgery. Marquis put up the worst ERA in the National League. Patches on the rotation took the form of retreads Sidney Ponson and Jeff Weaver.
Free agent LOOGY acquisition Ricardo Rincon was lost for the season after pitching only 3 innings in a Cardinal uniform, having injured himself pitching for Mexico in the World Baseball Classic tournament in March.
Isringhausen was never healthy, pitching poorly for most of the season before finally being lost to hip surgery in early September, forcing rookie Adam Wainwright into the closer role.
Despite all the above, the Cardinals won the division, the pennant and the World Series. I can't imagine that many things going wrong for them this year, and while Milwaukee and Chicago are better, Houston and Cincinnati (the 2nd and 3rd place teams last year) are not.
Prediction:
- St. Louis
- Milwaukee
- Houston
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Pittsburgh
by Lance on Apr 4, 2007 12:37 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 

















