It's Not My Fault!
Although, I guess I couldn't blame all of you for thinking, "Well, the Cubs were doing OK until Al started attending games," because I thought the same thing during today's frustrating 4-2 loss to the Astros; that makes my personal record 0-3, a much worse start than last year's 3-0.
Of course, we all saw what that 3-0 start at home in 2006 got us. Nothing, basically.
While the game was frustrating, because I think we all know this team will hit -- and really, I'm a little tired of hearing Lou Piniella blame it on the cold weather, considering the Red Sox, with four players from "the warm countries" (Ortiz, Lugo, Ramirez, Lowell) in the lineup today, scored 14 runs on a 43-degree day at Fenway Park -- there was yet another good sign in the 9th-inning rally that got the tying run on base with two out.
Ultimately meaningless, since a loss is a loss -- but think about it. Last year's team would have gone down 1-2-3 in the 9th, even to a nobody like Dan Wheeler, who's taken over as closer for Brad Lidge (and Lidge was warming up as Matt Murton popped up to end the game). This year's team showed some fight; the double by Jacque Jones nearly left the park, even with the howling northeast wind that made us cold even when the dim sun (no, not Chinese food, I said dim SUN) came out. The key to that inning was the borderline pitch that Michael Barrett looked at for strike three, with only one out and a runner on base. It did appear that was a good call, and on a pitch that close, you've got to at least try to foul it off.
I find it interesting that on the very day that I reinstated Blue Mike to BCB, the same Blue Mike who touted how wonderful Cesar Izturis was to all of us last year, Izturis had what was likely his worst day as a Cub to date, making three errors, including one that led to the Astros' fourth run in the fifth inning. And that could have completely changed the dynamic of the last of the 9th -- if the Cubs have that rally with a one-run deficit rather than two, then they have the tying run in scoring position rather than just on first base, and maybe Lidge (who's pitched terribly this year) is actually brought into the game.
Jason Marquis was... well, not so good today. Actually, after the first inning, he wasn't too bad -- he threw four more innings, not allowing a hit, and allowing just the unearned run in the fourth. But that first inning, in which he gave up four straight hits, all of which were hit very hard, was his undoing. Larry Rothschild waited about two batters too late to come out to the mound, I think -- when a pitcher clearly doesn't have his command early, and Marquis didn't, you've got to stem the tide before it washes over you, and he didn't. Give some credit to Marquis for at least keeping the game from getting totally out of hand.
I was surprised when Marquis didn't bat for himself in the fifth; he was on deck, but after Izturis walked, Lou sent up Ryan Theriot to pinch-hit. We all knew Marquis was coming out of the game anyway, but he might have been a better hitting option than Theriot at that point, especially with the bad start Theriot has had -- and then, when Murton pinch-hit in the 9th, that left only Ronny Cedeno (who was on deck) and Henry Blanco on the bench. What if the game goes into extra innings? Lou's going to have to manage that five-man bench better for such contingencies.
Props today to Angel Guzman and Scott Eyre, who threw four combined innings of three-hit, one-walk relief, keeping the game within reach.
It is still way too early to panic. Even in the last three losses, the club has shown signs of life where previous Cub ballclubs would have simply given up and had the manager shrug and say "Dude" a lot. This team will win.
Maybe not tomorrow, though -- and that's not because of the pitching matchup (favorable, Rich Hill vs. Wandy Rodriguez), but because of this rotten weather forecast:
Ugh. And if you think that's bad, look at this forecast for Milwaukee:
Wednesday Night: Periods of snow. Low around 30. North wind between 15 and 18 mph, with gusts as high as 36 mph. Chance of precipitation is 80%. New snow accumulation of 2 to 4 inches possible.
They may have a domed stadium in which the Indians and Angels can play in Milwaukee, but how are they going to do it if there are 10 inches of snow outside and no one can get there? The Tribe is going to think the snow is following them around. I'd love to see one of the games in that series, but I'm not driving up there in a snowstorm!
Anyway, if the Cubs and Astros can't play tomorrow, I suspect they'd play Thursday, a common off day for both teams (and Houston has a night game Friday in Philadelphia, so they could easily play Thursday afternoon here).
Finally, the crowd of 35,924 is far more tickets sold than I'd have expected for the second day of the season on a Tuesday afternoon -- it appeared there were about 20,000-22,000 in the park, and the bleachers were pretty well full, including the usual group of drunken frat boys with their shirts off in right field.
48 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Wish we were
It wasn't a quality start, but he rebounded from a bad first inning.
The 'stros came up there swinging -- going after the first pitch, again, as yesterday. (Note to Cubs pitchers: if this series continues, ALL FIRST PITCHES OUT OF THE STRIKE ZONE.) These 'first' pitches were very hittable.
Please don't panic. But, Al -- it does seem that cold weather affects this particular group, don't you think? The only time the bats were alive in this short season was under the roof at Miller.
This is affecting the players who haven't experienced 'Spring' at Wrigley, don't you think?
Especially Soriano, De Rosa, and Izturus. Jones, I have no idea.
Coming soon -- A diary on Opening Day @ Dodger Stadium, which by all accounts was a disaster -- and not because the home team lost......
by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Apr 10, 2007 5:59 PM CDT reply actions
A few things
Piniella, while I didn't like his comment, in the post game, he did clarify his statement. The Cubs have a team built around hitting lots of HRs, and this lots of fly balls. Their approach doesn't work well in cold weather. Piniella said very clearly that both teams have to hit in the same conditions. He wanted to make it clear that he was not blaming the weather.
As I said in the game thread, this line-up and its components are poorly constructed. Too many big hitters, not enough of a hitting gameplan. Its going to be feast or famine, and typically that doesn't bode well for Cub teams.
DmL
To be fair..
hmmmm....
"I was telling our general manager today, the way we're put together as a team, if we play in 40-degree (weather) all year, I don't think we're going to do very well because we don't have that type of team," Piniella said. "We have more power in our lineup. We need to bang it a little more, and once the weather warms up, we will."
Sounds like he's blaming the weather.
You didn't include his next quote.
Makes more sense here, doesn't it?
No Al, it doesn't.....
Somehow, and I don't know how due to the weather, the other team has somehow found a way to score enough runs to win. Baseball is kind of funny that way. One team loses and suddenly it's the wrong kind of team to win in the cold.
Maybe Selig could postpone the rest of the games until it warms up enough for the Cubs to win.
You really like...
He said right in that quote that he wasn't making any excuses. Period. You want to focus on the negative, you go right ahead.
Me, I'm looking forward to tomorrow's game. Weather permitting, of course.
You really like
He basically said his team isn't winning because it isn't built to win in the cold.
That's an excuse.
That isn't "focusing on the negative".
Just keep "looking forward to tomorrow's game".
The honeymoon lasts at least a year..
I absolutely agree.
Which as I said a couple days ago, is another reason why this team right now shouldn't have a short bench, making the adjustment even more diffulcult. Add in the fact that this club has 5 sub par Defensive OutFielders and it's even more reason that this club needs to find a spot for Pagan. Maybe with Miller not starting for another 7 days, maybe now would be a good time to do so.
by lemon17pie on Apr 10, 2007 7:53 PM CDT up reply actions
Gonna beat the vultures away from this dead horse.
I'm going to keep reminding those of you who railed me for merely suggesting Erstad every single week and until some of you admit that not persuing Erstad was a big mistake.
The Cubs should actually just cut Ward. I never liked that signing and even less so now. He's an absolute waste and a drain on the roster.
by escapegoat on Apr 10, 2007 8:01 PM CDT up reply actions
Ward has 3 ab's in 8 games
by lemon17pie on Apr 10, 2007 8:04 PM CDT up reply actions
I didn't see your original suggestion..
Erstad sucks
by jolietconvict on Apr 10, 2007 8:43 PM CDT up reply actions
Ward sucks harder
If you'd rather have Ward over Erstad, well than you suck suck suck suck suck suck suck......SUUUCCKKKK!!
by lemon17pie on Apr 10, 2007 11:41 PM CDT up reply actions
Daryle Ward
Daryle Ward isn't hitting in the two spot
Daryle Ward isn't even in the starting line-up.
Daryle Ward isn't a joke to most people in the baseball biz.
Therefore your comparison SUCK SUCK SUCK SUCK SUCK SUCK SUCK.....SUUUCCKKKKS!!
by Faith plus 1 on Apr 11, 2007 6:25 PM CDT up reply actions
Amen, Joliet
Agreed
by Faith plus 1 on Apr 11, 2007 6:25 PM CDT up reply actions
Actually...
It's a small sample, so they still have time to change my current opinion. The new people need to convince me they will help make it different, even Lou Piniella. He's not Dusty, but really, I think any manager after Dusty would've done something similar to what Piniella is doing(having them 'practice' and 'work'). I don't think that has translated to the field very well yet.
Anyway, I hate losing. If we win tomorrow, I'm sure I will change my mind.
Feast or famine
by BlueMike on Apr 10, 2007 6:27 PM CDT reply actions
Welcome back but the pitching is not the problem
I remain hopeful because bats warm up but BAD pitching is forever.
by jessica on Apr 10, 2007 7:21 PM CDT up reply actions
On the bright side,
Al, I know that it's not your fault....but just for the hellofit, could you possibly happen to have a conflict, and miss the next couple of games........?????
Just kidding!!!!
by deadcatbounce on Apr 10, 2007 6:38 PM CDT up reply actions
The Cubs still have a better record than the Sox..
I still like Lou.
Yep.
If what's happened the last three games is still happening in a month, then it's time for changes.
Remember all the criticism spilled here after the team looked really bad the first four spring training games? Give it a little more time, at least.
Not really angst for me anyway..
Now you may be right and it might take time for the new regime to kick in. Or it might be the case that this is the type of player the general manager has a tendency to sign. We shall see..
Weather Tomorrow
Fully agree the problem is the hitting - this team is clearly beter than last year, because at least (even today) it is geting in position to win. Just no followthrough -
I agree with what Lou - obviously not very articulately - is trying to say. Logical or not, defensible or not, it is obviously a fact that the offense isn't awake yet. We just need to get some tips from the Red Sox -
L.A. of Anaheim vs Cleveland of Milwaukee
Cleveland's mascot Slider and drum-banging John Adams even made the trip - Slider even took a trip down Bernie's slide after an Indian HR :)
The joke...
by sanantonecub on Apr 10, 2007 7:36 PM CDT up reply actions
I can't wait a month!
Again, this is early, just don't give me these B.S. toothpick excuses--just don't say anything if that's the only thing you are going to say.
Bottom line--the offense has sputtered so far because Soriano has been bad to date offensively and the No. 2 hole has done little as well. I am totally fine with Soriano having slump, it happens to everyone. Just say "he's in a slump, if it continues we might have to move him down in the lineup." It's still early enough in the season where a rhyme or reason is not required for everything.
I'm disappointed
Absolutely agree.
In 2006, we had an excellent record at this point in the season. I think we can all agree we were also very much a small ball team then as well (Pierre vs. Soriano in the leadoff; Pagan vs. Cliff Floyd as a reserve outfielder, etc.) Once we get the bats going, that's when we can really get some run production going. It's not a matter of nibbling singles and doubles here and there because that's not the kind of team we are.
Lou shouldn't even toss the possibility of moving Soriano down in the batting order yet--it's maddeningly early and the conditions are entirely uncharacteristic of the rest of the season. We'll get there--and we'll get there pretty darn soon.
by NightPutting on Apr 10, 2007 9:42 PM CDT up reply actions
When? WHEN! When will
Chances are, if they fall behind enough in the next 30-45 days, it is going to be a strubble.
So the other teams in the division, including the Freel-led Reds can score some runs in this brutal weather and the Cubs can't?
How about the Biggio-led Astros?
And the Pirates, with a $1.50 payroll? What about them?
What a bunch of f'ing horseshit!
by TheEman on Apr 10, 2007 10:43 PM CDT reply actions
Whoa now.
I can't exactly tell you when the bats are going to warm up, but I certainly know that there are a number of great players that simply are not playing up to even their normal caliber, much less overachieving. Now, I'm not making excuses for this team. It's been absolutely maddening to see so many missed opportunities out there, and the game today was about as frustrating as they come. Jacque Jones, for one, has no business batting second in this lineup. Overall, though, I have faith in the players' ability, and I truly believe we're going to turn things around here very soon.
by NightPutting on Apr 10, 2007 11:16 PM CDT up reply actions
To me
Nobody may want to talk about it, but the biggest problem in this offense is still WALKS. There is definitely more power and definitely see an improve over last year, but at most, this is a return to 2004-2005 offense. Walks allow you to be more consistent in scoring runs. It's that simple. Hendry, as Dusty, will probably never get it in relation to this. Do you think it's a coincidence that the Red Sox, who have been a winning franchise for a long time, decide to get Drew instead of Soriano? Especially when the Cubs probably needed a lefthanded OBP guy as bad as any other team? Anyhow... I think this offense will finish middle of the pack in similar fashion to the 2004-2005 ones... so it will depend squarely on the pitching how far the team goes.
Luis
And Piniella batting Jones second a couple of times so far is way too much for my liking. A guy who doesn't walk and grounds out into double plays can't be your second guy, no matter if he hits righties better. And Izturis? ...
Good point Luis,
It's so cold in October!
If it makes you feel better Al...
Hahaha..
Never too early...
by baglesshound on Apr 11, 2007 12:00 AM CDT reply actions
DBacks beat the Reds in 10
Even though the Reds have lost 2 against the DBacks, I'm starting to think they're the best team in the NL Central.
Josh Hamilton hit a 3 run HR as well. Go figure.
by lemon17pie on Apr 11, 2007 12:01 AM CDT reply actions
Piniella criticism
You play the cards you were dealt and Piniella is trying to explain that.
DmL
Two things
- Get Soriano out of the leadoff spot
- Bench Izturis
correction
(Mike, don't bother)
by Faith plus 1 on Apr 11, 2007 6:29 PM CDT up reply actions

by 



















