Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

It's Not My Fault!

Although, I guess I couldn't blame all of you for thinking, "Well, the Cubs were doing OK until Al started attending games," because I thought the same thing during today's frustrating 4-2 loss to the Astros; that makes my personal record 0-3, a much worse start than last year's 3-0.

Of course, we all saw what that 3-0 start at home in 2006 got us. Nothing, basically.

While the game was frustrating, because I think we all know this team will hit -- and really, I'm a little tired of hearing Lou Piniella blame it on the cold weather, considering the Red Sox, with four players from "the warm countries" (Ortiz, Lugo, Ramirez, Lowell) in the lineup today, scored 14 runs on a 43-degree day at Fenway Park -- there was yet another good sign in the 9th-inning rally that got the tying run on base with two out.

Ultimately meaningless, since a loss is a loss -- but think about it. Last year's team would have gone down 1-2-3 in the 9th, even to a nobody like Dan Wheeler, who's taken over as closer for Brad Lidge (and Lidge was warming up as Matt Murton popped up to end the game). This year's team showed some fight; the double by Jacque Jones nearly left the park, even with the howling northeast wind that made us cold even when the dim sun (no, not Chinese food, I said dim SUN) came out. The key to that inning was the borderline pitch that Michael Barrett looked at for strike three, with only one out and a runner on base. It did appear that was a good call, and on a pitch that close, you've got to at least try to foul it off.

I find it interesting that on the very day that I reinstated Blue Mike to BCB, the same Blue Mike who touted how wonderful Cesar Izturis was to all of us last year, Izturis had what was likely his worst day as a Cub to date, making three errors, including one that led to the Astros' fourth run in the fifth inning. And that could have completely changed the dynamic of the last of the 9th -- if the Cubs have that rally with a one-run deficit rather than two, then they have the tying run in scoring position rather than just on first base, and maybe Lidge (who's pitched terribly this year) is actually brought into the game.

Jason Marquis was... well, not so good today. Actually, after the first inning, he wasn't too bad -- he threw four more innings, not allowing a hit, and allowing just the unearned run in the fourth. But that first inning, in which he gave up four straight hits, all of which were hit very hard, was his undoing. Larry Rothschild waited about two batters too late to come out to the mound, I think -- when a pitcher clearly doesn't have his command early, and Marquis didn't, you've got to stem the tide before it washes over you, and he didn't. Give some credit to Marquis for at least keeping the game from getting totally out of hand.

I was surprised when Marquis didn't bat for himself in the fifth; he was on deck, but after Izturis walked, Lou sent up Ryan Theriot to pinch-hit. We all knew Marquis was coming out of the game anyway, but he might have been a better hitting option than Theriot at that point, especially with the bad start Theriot has had -- and then, when Murton pinch-hit in the 9th, that left only Ronny Cedeno (who was on deck) and Henry Blanco on the bench. What if the game goes into extra innings? Lou's going to have to manage that five-man bench better for such contingencies.

Props today to Angel Guzman and Scott Eyre, who threw four combined innings of three-hit, one-walk relief, keeping the game within reach.

It is still way too early to panic. Even in the last three losses, the club has shown signs of life where previous Cub ballclubs would have simply given up and had the manager shrug and say "Dude" a lot. This team will win.

Maybe not tomorrow, though -- and that's not because of the pitching matchup (favorable, Rich Hill vs. Wandy Rodriguez), but because of this rotten weather forecast:

Wednesday: Periods of rain and snow, becoming all rain after 1pm. High near 34. Windy, with a east northeast wind 25 to 30 mph decreasing to between 10 and 15 mph. Chance of precipitation is 90%. New snow accumulation of less than a half inch possible.

Ugh. And if you think that's bad, look at this forecast for Milwaukee:

Wednesday: Periods of snow. The snow could be heavy at times. High near 33. East wind between 17 and 22 mph, with gusts as high as 40 mph. Chance of precipitation is 100%. New snow accumulation of 3 to 7 inches possible.

Wednesday Night: Periods of snow. Low around 30. North wind between 15 and 18 mph, with gusts as high as 36 mph. Chance of precipitation is 80%. New snow accumulation of 2 to 4 inches possible.

They may have a domed stadium in which the Indians and Angels can play in Milwaukee, but how are they going to do it if there are 10 inches of snow outside and no one can get there? The Tribe is going to think the snow is following them around. I'd love to see one of the games in that series, but I'm not driving up there in a snowstorm!

Anyway, if the Cubs and Astros can't play tomorrow, I suspect they'd play Thursday, a common off day for both teams (and Houston has a night game Friday in Philadelphia, so they could easily play Thursday afternoon here).

Finally, the crowd of 35,924 is far more tickets sold than I'd have expected for the second day of the season on a Tuesday afternoon -- it appeared there were about 20,000-22,000 in the park, and the bleachers were pretty well full, including the usual group of drunken frat boys with their shirts off in right field.

Comment 48 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Wish we were
seeing the Miller & Marquis we saw in AZ -- but, after the first inning, Marquis was acceptable.
It wasn't a quality start, but he rebounded from a bad first inning.

The 'stros came up there swinging -- going after the first pitch, again, as yesterday. (Note to Cubs pitchers: if this series continues, ALL FIRST PITCHES OUT OF THE STRIKE ZONE.) These 'first' pitches were very hittable.

Please don't panic. But, Al -- it does seem that cold weather affects this particular group, don't you think? The only time the bats were alive in this short season was under the roof at Miller.

This is affecting the players who haven't experienced 'Spring' at Wrigley, don't you think?
Especially Soriano, De Rosa, and Izturus. Jones, I have no idea.

Coming soon -- A diary on Opening Day @ Dodger Stadium, which by all accounts was a disaster -- and not because the home team lost......

by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Apr 10, 2007 5:59 PM CDT reply actions  

A few things
First off, while Izturis was not good today in the field, the second error, IMO, should have gone to Marquis. He lobbed it instead of waiting a split second until Izturis was in position. That one should have gone to Marquis. It was not a good throw. Catchable? Yes, but still a poor toss.

Piniella, while I didn't like his comment, in the post game, he did clarify his statement. The Cubs have a team built around hitting lots of HRs, and this lots of fly balls. Their approach doesn't work well in cold weather. Piniella said very clearly that both teams have to hit in the same conditions. He wanted to make it clear that he was not blaming the weather.

As I said in the game thread, this line-up and its components are poorly constructed. Too many big hitters, not enough of a hitting gameplan. Its going to be feast or famine, and typically that doesn't bode well for Cub teams.

DmL

by dmlichte on Apr 10, 2007 6:02 PM CDT reply actions  

To be fair..
this team HAS gone down to a fairly soft closer already this year. A 1-2-3 ninth vs. David Weathers in an 8 pitch performance..
Well, sometimes nothin is a real cool hand.

by wicubfan on Apr 10, 2007 6:12 PM CDT reply actions  

hmmmm....
"Even before the loss, which dropped the Cubs to 3-5, Chicago manager Lou Piniella predicted the team would play better once the weather warms. It was 47 degrees Tuesday.

"I was telling our general manager today, the way we're put together as a team, if we play in 40-degree (weather) all year, I don't think we're going to do very well because we don't have that type of team," Piniella said. "We have more power in our lineup. We need to bang it a little more, and once the weather warms up, we will."

Sounds like he's blaming the weather.

by Peoria Matt on Apr 10, 2007 6:12 PM CDT reply actions  

You didn't include his next quote.
"I'm not complaining or making any excuses," Piniella said. "It's just fact. It's hard on every team. Baseball wasn't made to be played in 40-degree weather, it's that plain and simple. The better pitching you have, the better defense you play, and the more team speed you have early in the season in this type of environment is conducive to winning more baseball games. That's all I'm trying to say."

Makes more sense here, doesn't it?

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Apr 10, 2007 6:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

No Al, it doesn't.....
there is no point in Piniella even bringing this up.  

Somehow, and I don't know how due to the weather, the other team has somehow found a way to score enough runs to win.  Baseball is kind of funny that way.  One team loses and suddenly it's the wrong kind of team to win in the cold.

Maybe Selig could postpone the rest of the games until it warms up enough for the Cubs to win.

by Peoria Matt on Apr 10, 2007 6:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

You really like...
... to focus on the negative, don't you?

He said right in that quote that he wasn't making any excuses. Period. You want to focus on the negative, you go right ahead.

Me, I'm looking forward to tomorrow's game. Weather permitting, of course.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Apr 10, 2007 6:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

You really like
to believe anything out of Lou's mouth, don't you?

He basically said his team isn't winning because it isn't built to win in the cold.

That's an excuse.

That isn't "focusing on the negative".

Just keep "looking forward to tomorrow's game".

by Peoria Matt on Apr 11, 2007 5:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

The honeymoon lasts at least a year..
I agree Matt. Had Dusty said this, he would have been raked over the coals. Silly comments, questionable lineup moves and double switches, bad baserunning, and poor defense will be overlooked because "Lou won't stand for it" and "the players all come out early to stretch". I hope Lou really does make a difference, but I've really seen evidence only at the margin.
Well, sometimes nothin is a real cool hand.

by wicubfan on Apr 10, 2007 6:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

I absolutely agree.
Piniella has made some very questionable moves through 8 games and is showing some rust of not Managing in the NL since I believe 1990.

 Which as I said a couple days ago, is another reason why this team right now shouldn't have a short bench, making the adjustment even more diffulcult. Add in the fact that this club has 5 sub par Defensive OutFielders and it's even more reason that this club needs to find a spot for Pagan. Maybe with Miller not starting for another 7 days, maybe now would be a good time to do so.

 

"What's it all about? Booze, Broads and bullshit." Harry Caray

by lemon17pie on Apr 10, 2007 7:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

Gonna beat the vultures away from this dead horse.
But if the Cubs would've signed Erstad (.300 avg .393 OBP)instead of the mammouth and 1 diminsional pinch hitter, who can only hit Righties and can only play 1B Ward,they could've went with 12 pitchers the entire season and not have to think about using 5 bench players.

 I'm going to keep reminding those of you who railed me for merely suggesting Erstad every single week and until some of you admit that not persuing Erstad was a big mistake.

 The Cubs should actually just cut Ward. I never liked that signing and even less so now. He's an absolute waste and a drain on the roster.

AC046299

by escapegoat on Apr 10, 2007 8:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ward has 3 ab's in 8 games
 Total waste of a roster spot.
"What's it all about? Booze, Broads and bullshit." Harry Caray

by lemon17pie on Apr 10, 2007 8:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

I didn't see your original suggestion..
but it sounds like it was well thought out. Why not Erstad anyway? Injury risk? As overweight as Ward is, he's prolly an injury risk too.
Well, sometimes nothin is a real cool hand.

by wicubfan on Apr 10, 2007 8:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

Erstad sucks
He can't hit and he hasn't played a full-season of CF in 5 years.  He will not hit .300 or have a .390 OBP all season and he'll be lucky to play 100 games.

by jolietconvict on Apr 10, 2007 8:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ward sucks harder
much, much harder.

 If you'd rather have Ward over Erstad, well than you  suck suck suck suck suck suck suck......SUUUCCKKKK!!

"What's it all about? Booze, Broads and bullshit." Harry Caray

by lemon17pie on Apr 10, 2007 11:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

Daryle Ward
isn't acclaimed left, right and sideways for no reason.

Daryle Ward isn't hitting in the two spot

Daryle Ward isn't even in the starting line-up.

Daryle Ward isn't a joke to most people in the baseball biz.

Therefore your comparison SUCK SUCK SUCK SUCK SUCK SUCK SUCK.....SUUUCCKKKKS!!

Faith Plus One - Contributing Editor -http://www.inaleagueofherown.com

by Faith plus 1 on Apr 11, 2007 6:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

Amen, Joliet
The Darren Erstad love must stop.  The guy is just a TERRIBLE hitter.  He is worse than Juan Pierre.  He has sucked in the past and is guaranteed to suck this year, notwithstanding his good start.

by Jhoratio on Apr 11, 2007 11:32 AM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed
Look at his EqA the last 6 years -- he's notched average ONCE.
Faith Plus One - Contributing Editor -http://www.inaleagueofherown.com

by Faith plus 1 on Apr 11, 2007 6:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

Actually...
Last year the team also made comebacks and fell short.  I'm going to check how often it was, but I feel the same way I did last year. Last year's team had good games too.  I'm not saying that they will be a horrible team, but I just don't see a big difference besides the $300 million that seems to come up every time the Cubs are mentioned.  I'm getting very sick of that, BTW, even though it's the truth.

It's a small sample, so they still have time to change my current opinion. The new people need to convince me they will help make it different, even Lou Piniella. He's not Dusty, but really, I think any manager after Dusty would've done something similar to what Piniella is doing(having them 'practice' and 'work').  I don't think that has translated to the field very well yet.

Anyway, I hate losing.  If we win tomorrow, I'm sure I will change my mind.

"I don't talk. I just let what I do talk for myself." -Johan Santana

by sparkles721 on Apr 10, 2007 6:24 PM CDT reply actions  

Feast or famine
This is a feast or famine lineup.  The problem is the pitching is mediocre, thereby making it difficult to overcome such an offense.  There are going to be days when the Cubs put up 8, 9, 10 runs in the blink of the eye.  But there will be too many days like yesterday and today where the failure to execute and do the little things in the absence of the big bats thundering is the killer.  Add to this a generally lousy defense and you have recipe for a .500 ballclub in a very weak National League.  

by BlueMike on Apr 10, 2007 6:27 PM CDT reply actions  

Welcome back but the pitching is not the problem
Well at least not the starting pitching. Those thundering bats have been pretty quiet most of the time and so far hitting has been remarkably untimely. Marquis was not the problem today. He wasn't great but he wasn't terrible and he got not only had  no run support but bad fielding as well  The defense is a problem and the relief pitching uneven at best except so far Dempster ( go figure)

I remain hopeful because bats warm up but BAD pitching is forever.

"It's the Cubbies. There's always a vibe. It's the greatest vibe in baseball." Greg Maddux on Cub fan's optimism even after the 06 debacle.

by jessica on Apr 10, 2007 7:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

On the bright side,
it's April 10th, and we're still on top of the Redbirds.....Oh, goshdarnit, never mind.......We can't even say that any more.

Al, I know that it's not your fault....but just for the hellofit, could you possibly happen to have a conflict, and miss the next couple of games........?????

Hey Lou, we're long overdue.

by deadcatbounce on Apr 10, 2007 6:33 PM CDT reply actions  

Just kidding!!!!
n/t
Hey Lou, we're long overdue.

by deadcatbounce on Apr 10, 2007 6:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

LMAO
Maybe a postponement due to snow is just what the team needs. That might actually happen tomorrow.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Apr 10, 2007 6:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

The Cubs still have a better record than the Sox..
right?  oops..guess not.
Well, sometimes nothin is a real cool hand.

by wicubfan on Apr 10, 2007 6:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

Face it
losing sucks.
Watching Zach Johnson beat Tiger Woods was a thing of beauty.

by sue369 on Apr 10, 2007 6:34 PM CDT reply actions  

I still like Lou.
I still like this Cubbie team. End of story.
Hey Lou, we're long overdue.

by deadcatbounce on Apr 10, 2007 6:59 PM CDT reply actions  

Yep.
Way too early for this kind of angst.

If what's happened the last three games is still happening in a month, then it's time for changes.

Remember all the criticism spilled here after the team looked really bad the first four spring training games? Give it a little more time, at least.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Apr 11, 2007 4:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

Not really angst for me anyway..
I just didn't think a switch of manager would change things all that much, and it hasn't as far as results on the field yet. My point is that a lot of the same things Baker was crucified for are still happening. Things such as baserunning blunders, excuses by the manager, impatience at the plate, and poor fielding.

Now you may be right and it might take time for the new regime to kick in. Or it might be the case that this is the type of player the general manager has a tendency to sign. We shall see..

Well, sometimes nothin is a real cool hand.

by wicubfan on Apr 11, 2007 10:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

Weather Tomorrow
I'm outta here tonight - y'all are on your own!

Fully agree the problem is the hitting - this team is clearly beter than last year, because at least (even today) it is geting in position to win.   Just no followthrough -

I agree with what Lou - obviously not very articulately - is trying to say.  Logical or not, defensible or not, it is obviously a fact that the offense isn't awake yet.  We just need to get some tips from the Red Sox -

¡BLANCO!

by 08Cubs on Apr 10, 2007 7:32 PM CDT reply actions  

L.A. of Anaheim vs Cleveland of Milwaukee
Watching the game on mlb.tv - Milwaukee has turned out in droves and deserves recognition - 18,000 plus seats sold for tonights game, filling up the entire lower level (including outfield) and most of the second deck according to Cleveland announcers.

Cleveland's mascot Slider and drum-banging John Adams even made the trip - Slider even took a trip down Bernie's slide after an Indian HR :)

Go Nebraska Football!

by sanantonecub on Apr 10, 2007 7:35 PM CDT reply actions  

The joke...
There are more fans in Milwaukee watching Cleveland then watching the Brewers in Florida.  Atlanta's crowd against Washington is probably also as large or smaller.
Go Nebraska Football!

by sanantonecub on Apr 10, 2007 7:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

I can't wait a month!
To hold back my criticism.  We don't need Dusty part 2...making excuses for everything...The hitters in our lineup are just as capable of hitting doubles and singles as the hitters in the Astros' lineup today, i.e., we are not a HR or nothing lineup.  I think spots 1 & 2 in the lineup have pretty much sucked so far and just like the last regime proved (perhaps unintentionally) it's tough to score when you give away outs at the 1-2 spots in the lineup.  This team should hit and score, just don't make excuses about the nationality of the players or the lineup.  If certain types of players do poorly in this weather, based on their origin, then please tell me Lou why you aren't fielding an all nordic lineup or what is available to you on your roster as an equivalent?

Again, this is early, just don't give me these B.S. toothpick excuses--just don't say anything if that's the only thing you are going to say.

Bottom line--the offense has sputtered so far because Soriano has been bad to date offensively and the No. 2 hole has done little as well.  I am totally fine with Soriano having slump, it happens to everyone.  Just say "he's in a slump, if it continues we might have to move him down in the lineup."  It's still early enough in the season where a rhyme or reason is not required for everything.

by DudeVf11 on Apr 10, 2007 8:14 PM CDT reply actions  

I'm disappointed
but not discouraged at the start. It would have been nice to see them get out the gate quickly but I still think this is going to be a much better team than last years. How much better remains to be seen. If they play tomorrow, I think Rich Hill will throw a good ballgame for us.

by qccub on Apr 10, 2007 9:25 PM CDT reply actions  

Absolutely agree.
Think about this quote from Lou--specifically how it relates to this team versus the '06 Cubs:
"We don't have as much team speed to play the little ball that you need in this type of environment. For us, the quicker the weather warms up, the better."

In 2006, we had an excellent record at this point in the season. I think we can all agree we were also very much a small ball team then as well (Pierre vs. Soriano in the leadoff; Pagan vs. Cliff Floyd as a reserve outfielder, etc.) Once we get the bats going, that's when we can really get some run production going. It's not a matter of nibbling singles and doubles here and there because that's not the kind of team we are.

Lou shouldn't even toss the possibility of moving Soriano down in the batting order yet--it's maddeningly early and the conditions are entirely uncharacteristic of the rest of the season. We'll get there--and we'll get there pretty darn soon.

"And heeeere come the pretzels!"

by NightPutting on Apr 10, 2007 9:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

When? WHEN! When will
the BATS get going? A Week? A Month? When the team is 8 games out of 1st? 10? WAKE UP folks! This team does NOT have the "swagger" or winning tradition like the Yankees or Braves, and can turn it on anytime they want.

Chances are, if they fall behind enough in the next 30-45 days, it is going to be a strubble.

So the other teams in the division, including the Freel-led Reds can score some runs in this brutal weather and the Cubs can't?

How about the Biggio-led Astros?

And the Pirates, with a $1.50 payroll? What about them?

What a bunch of f'ing horseshit!

Cardinals make me see Red!

by TheEman on Apr 10, 2007 10:43 PM CDT reply actions  

Whoa now.
I know you're inclined to take the "sky is falling" approach, especially when we've been so utterly ineffective on offense. It's only being pragmatic, really. Of course, if we were to continue on this path for the "next 30-45 days", we'd pretty much be up shit creek. That's obvious.  But we all just need to calm down. This is not the way this team is going to play if you look at this year holistically.

I can't exactly tell you when the bats are going to warm up, but I certainly know that there are a number of great players that simply are not playing up to even their normal caliber, much less overachieving. Now, I'm not making excuses for this team. It's been absolutely maddening to see so many missed opportunities out there, and the game today was about as frustrating as they come. Jacque Jones, for one, has no business batting second in this lineup. Overall, though, I have faith in the players' ability, and I truly believe we're going to turn things around here very soon.

"And heeeere come the pretzels!"

by NightPutting on Apr 10, 2007 11:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

To me
The cold weather comments do sound like an excuse. And they may not be realizing it but they are contradicting themselves. They want to build a team to win the world series, right? Well... I don't think Wrigley is going to be all that hot in October, if the team manages to get to the postseason. So you are already saying that this team will be at a disadvantage if it manages to get past the regular season.

Nobody may want to talk about it, but the biggest problem in this offense is still WALKS. There is definitely more power and definitely see an improve over last year, but at most, this is a return to 2004-2005 offense. Walks allow you to be more consistent in scoring runs. It's that simple. Hendry, as Dusty, will probably never get it in relation to this. Do you think it's a coincidence that the Red Sox, who have been a winning franchise for a long time, decide to get Drew instead of Soriano? Especially when the Cubs probably needed a lefthanded OBP guy as bad as any other team? Anyhow... I think this offense will finish middle of the pack in similar fashion to the 2004-2005 ones... so it will depend squarely on the pitching how far the team goes.

Luis

And Piniella batting Jones second a couple of times so far is way too much for my liking. A guy who doesn't walk and grounds out into double plays can't be your second guy, no matter if he hits righties better. And Izturis? ...

by Luis on Apr 10, 2007 10:45 PM CDT reply actions  

Good point Luis,
how could this team possibly win in October?

It's so cold in October!

by Peoria Matt on Apr 11, 2007 5:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

If it makes you feel better Al...
The Cubs have not won a single game I've watched down here at school (U of Illinois)...I went home for Easter weekend and I missed the Reds game that was on CLTV--although, as it turns out, (unbeknownst to me) Insight cable apparently carried that game on the profoundly unwatchable NASA channel (no joke). So, for those of you in the Champaign area, it's something to keep in mind the next time a game isn't on one of the normal WGN/CSN/FOX/ESPN stations.
"And heeeere come the pretzels!"

by NightPutting on Apr 10, 2007 11:21 PM CDT reply actions  

Good news..
Sox lose in heartbreaking fashion.
Well, sometimes nothin is a real cool hand.

by wicubfan on Apr 10, 2007 11:47 PM CDT reply actions  

Hahaha..
Oakland's game winning "hit" goes off Podsednik's head..
Well, sometimes nothin is a real cool hand.

by wicubfan on Apr 10, 2007 11:52 PM CDT reply actions  

Never too early...
to panic. Especially with the 100th year anniversary since you know what happened coming up.

by baglesshound on Apr 11, 2007 12:00 AM CDT reply actions  

DBacks beat the Reds in 10
 DBacks are looking good. Have done the right things so far this year and have been fundamentally sound. Doing all the things a veteran team like the Cubs haven't. Their gonna be in it all year.

 Even though the Reds have lost 2 against the DBacks, I'm starting to think they're the best team in the NL Central.

 Josh Hamilton hit a 3 run HR as well. Go figure.

"What's it all about? Booze, Broads and bullshit." Harry Caray

by lemon17pie on Apr 11, 2007 12:01 AM CDT reply actions  

Piniella criticism
I don't agree with those who are saying that Piniella is being Dusty. Its not at all the same. Piniella isn't trying to say that its okay that the team has lost. He's more or less saying that Hendry built a team that isn't going to do well in cold weather... and he's right. This team has HR hitters who hit fly balls. He came out and said that both teams have to play in this weather, too. So this is not Dusty part two, its Piniella trying to explain why this team isn't hitting. Its also him saying, without coming out and saying it, that there is very little balance in the offense.

You play the cards you were dealt and Piniella is trying to explain that.

DmL

by dmlichte on Apr 11, 2007 12:07 AM CDT reply actions  

Two things
this club needs to do:
  1. Get Soriano out of the leadoff spot
  2. Bench Izturis

by Jhoratio on Apr 11, 2007 11:37 AM CDT reply actions  

correction
get rid of Izturis.

(Mike, don't bother)

Faith Plus One - Contributing Editor -http://www.inaleagueofherown.com

by Faith plus 1 on Apr 11, 2007 6:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Maybe it's time to take a deep breath

Recent FanPosts

Zambrano_background_2_small
What is the most likely move in June regarding current players?
Small
Draft Prep: Pierce Johnson
Small
Trying to be positive (need some help)
Small
Soriano back to Second?
Small
Javier Baez Peoria Bound?
Small
Draft Prep: Conference Tournament Version
Despite-an-inflated-babip-lahair-is-no-one-month-wonder
Suddenly, I feel your pain
Small
Start of the LaHair Regression?
Dsc06783_small
Rookie Season Ticket Open House

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Doug Glanville On His Teammate, Kerry Wood
Thanks.
Samardzija takes a dig at Hawk Harrelson
Chicago vs. Chicago, Round 2.
Wrigley Field Photo Gallery

Recent FanShots

Wrigley Field Supporters Propose Tearing Down Rest Of Chicago
2012 Stars and Stripes Hat
Sveum moves Castro back to #2 spot
OT: Tyler Colvin bats 2nd
The Pittsburgh Pirates Offensive Catastrophe
Roy Halladay Bobblehead Fail
Full sized image
All The Topps Baseball Card Cubs, 1951 - 2012
Rob Neyer answers the question: When should the Cubs call up Anthony Rizzo?
Don't Have MLB Network? You Might Get Shut Out Of A Playoff Telecast

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Featured Poll

Poll
Should the National League adopt the designated hitter rule?

  964 votes | Results

Cubs By The Numbers

Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.

Click here to order your copy, available now!

Recent Stories in Chicago Cubs Game Threads

Yahoo_full_count

Recent Stories in Ticket Exchanges


Managing Editor

Alyellontoppscard_small Al Yellon

Front Page Contributors

Profile_small Josh Timmers

B_w_avatar_small Brett Taylor

Marvin_the_martian_small Shawn Domagal-Goldman

Other Contributors

Toonmike_small Mike Bojanowski

Dsc_0139_small David Sameshima