Zambrano's struggles
The Cubs front office are screwing themselves and Zambrano over by not signing an extension. Having already spent over $300 million, adding another 80 to it won't hurt in selling the team. What they are doing is causing Zambrano to pitch under tremendous amount of pressure and having these poor performances. If the pitcher was anyone else, I would agree that the uncertainty of the contract situation isn't going to affect them, but Zambrano being the emotional guy he is, it does and will continue to affect his pitching. It's not like he gets to play everyday. He plays once every 5 days and there is little room for error, especially being labeled the ace of the staff. The front office has to do everyone a favor and sign this guy.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
0 recs |
47 comments
Comments
If Zambrano can't pitch without a contract.......
by PriorandAramisfan23 on May 10, 2007 12:41 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
ya beat me to it
I love watching Zambrano play, but if we are saying that he is mentally weak (which is what I gather this poster is trying to say) then is he really a guy you want to throw a truck load of money at?
by mike on May 10, 2007 12:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No,
by PriorandAramisfan23 on May 10, 2007 12:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yep
by BlueMike on May 10, 2007 2:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought he was a GREAT pitcher?
by DTJchris on May 10, 2007 6:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed Mike
by pageian on May 11, 2007 6:22 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's not a "true" ace
If anything, he's reinforced my opinion that he's not a true ace. I've always said he's just too inconsistent not only from start to start, but from inning to inning. You can not have that and expect to be your team's ace.
Zambrano still has a long ways to go and a lot of maturing to do, for me to even consider him a "true" ace.
by lemon17pie on May 11, 2007 6:57 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maddux
by kerrysotherwife on May 11, 2007 1:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Please do me a favor
Besiedes the fact that you're completely and utterly dead wrong.
by lemon17pie on May 11, 2007 1:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Z has been in slow decline since 05
His ERA has climbed, and his K/Walk ratio has worsened, two critical signs of concern. You would think at 26, he would be improving, but his best years were clearly 04 and 05, when he had some real dominant games he pitched.
by MPH73 on May 10, 2007 11:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's a crappy excuse.
I've made it clear before, but if we can get a lot in exchange for Zambrano (and it would have to be a lot) then I'd do it in a second. I just doubt any team would give up too much to get him.
by nickler on May 10, 2007 12:43 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The Giants
by pageian on May 11, 2007 6:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah...
I have to believe that, once a guy steps out on the field, his only focus must be on doing whatever he can to help his team win the game. And I think Z is trying to do that.
I'd also point out that Big Z has a history of slow starts and that, compared with last year, he's actually doing better in terms of wins.
by dat cubfan daver on May 10, 2007 12:49 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Well listen..
What's not fair is to put this on the Cubs front office. This is not a baseball issue. This is about whether the tentative owner will accept a significant new long-term liability entry on the balance sheet. The only one who decides that is Zell. Or his bankers, as the case may be. And being mindful of the mountain of financial and legal issues being handled at the moment, this is not critical. Give them till the end of the month before we start panicking.
by Damen Jackson on May 10, 2007 1:00 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
by pageian on May 11, 2007 6:30 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
"only" 5 years?
No team will sign Zambrano to a deal longer than 5. None.
by lemon17pie on May 11, 2007 7:04 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Crappy excuse maybe but...
by Kinky Reggae on May 10, 2007 1:25 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
bingo
by Faith plus 1 on May 10, 2007 1:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Workhorse
by ExNorthsider on May 10, 2007 1:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Where to start.....
It would be a disaster to sign him long term if he's hurt? Really? So if we find out that he has a mild forearm strain, he misses one start and then comes back pitching great like he's shown he can the last 5 years we would have avoided disaster by not signing him at a hometown discount?
Also, the playing better in a contract year thing has been studied and more or less disproven. No doubt it has an effect on some players one way or the other but you can't say that most do better in a contract year.
I know Cub fans are passionate and emotional but I wish more would post with their head and not the heart on their sleeve.
by pageian on May 11, 2007 6:35 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Reason to believe Zambrano could be hurt...
Now, I am not at all saying that he is pitching in pain, just pointing out that that is a big indicator and sign for coaches.
Having said that, I don't think Zambrano with everything he has to lose by pitching through pain and likewise for the Cubs, is pitching in pain.
by lemon17pie on May 11, 2007 7:09 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
There are...
- Bad mechanics
- Injury
I don't think it's injury, because Z's velocity has not decreased, just his location.
by Al on May 11, 2007 8:21 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i posted this in another Z thread
this is causing his ball to tail and rise rather than tail and sink, which is resulting in more FLY BALLS than GROUND BALLS, which along with the rising BB Rate is as big a concern as any
by DartmouthCubsFan on May 11, 2007 9:34 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It has?
by Al on May 11, 2007 1:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
that is not 99 98 97 or 96 which he frequently hit
by oldtimer on May 11, 2007 1:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
94 out of the strike zone big time. He has lost
by oldtimer on May 11, 2007 1:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you guys
by luv4cubs2 on May 10, 2007 1:46 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
If that is his problem...
Sorry I disagree with you. This isn't like a factory worker who feels pressure that he will lose his job and not be able to feed his family. Zambrano will get his money one way or another from the Cubs or another team.
Most players have contract years where they up to the impeding payday. I haven't heard too many players who play down in their contract year.
by rlpete on May 10, 2007 2:00 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
why
by luv4cubs2 on May 10, 2007 2:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That would be ok too
by rlpete on May 10, 2007 2:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not going to happen
by BlueMike on May 10, 2007 3:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have to agree with you again
by pageian on May 11, 2007 6:42 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
im suprised no one has made a roid claim
by HerrProf on May 10, 2007 4:17 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
You mean..
by wicubfan on May 11, 2007 10:31 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
AAAARGHH!!
6 starts... and still unimpressive. This is ridiculous. The man is supposed to be our ace. Right now I thank goodness Hendry had the good sense to get Lilly and Wang or else our season would already be down the toilet.
Chien Minh Wang just gave up 14 runs to the Rangers. I really wish the management would explore a trade of these two, and see if we can get a couple of prospects in the deal as well. I think the change in scenery would help Wang, and I think the prospects would be of great benefit in the long term. And I think he'll do as good as Zambrano this year.
by nickler on May 10, 2007 4:33 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
They'd have to be VERY good prospects
by pageian on May 11, 2007 6:45 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've been saying here on BCB
I'm not schooled on Hughes, other than to say I've heard he's excellent and has an unlimited ceiling. But would an unproven rookie - even someone like Hughes - be enough for Z? I'd like to think we could get another player, too.
And I think getting something for Z would help our club immensely.
by Kegler on May 11, 2007 11:21 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think he would........
by PriorandAramisfan23 on May 11, 2007 11:37 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
big mistake
by cubsluver22 on May 10, 2007 6:32 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
"(maddux) like"
Additionally, what ever happened to the norm about overachieving during a contract year. To sign Z to big money after the start he's had is insane. Perhaps he'll settle down and finish with a decent season but will it really be worth the kind of money he's looking for. I almost hate to say it, but I think Z can be used to improve the team through a mid-season trade to someone. Do you really want these sorry early season starts for another 5-7 years for the kind of money it will cost. Hendry giving him his wishes is just plain irresponsible.
by Luigi on May 10, 2007 8:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Correction
by Luigi on May 10, 2007 8:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Facts
He also had a horrible half of a season every year between 88 and 91.
I know facts are standing in the way of all this hate but these are the facts.
by kerrysotherwife on May 11, 2007 1:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
ok
by cubsluver22 on May 10, 2007 11:14 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Crazy Horse Z
by BlueMike on May 11, 2007 8:36 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
That is
I would trade him to the Yankees for Wang and some outfielder who can catch a baseball.
by Tekboy on May 11, 2007 10:23 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs





















