Pinella/McDonough/Hendry Meeting -or- Barrett MIA
While listening to The Score on the way home they reported that McDonough and Hendry have been locked away in Lou's office since 4:15PM, this was reported at around 6:15... 2 hours of meeting in what I'm sure is a close-quarters manager's office.
This obviously lends itself to lots of discussion, is Lou wanting out? Do they want Lou out? Is this a PR move to make it seem like they care?
Also, it appears that Michael Barret had not yet arrived to the ballpark and was not listed as the starting catcher for today's game... Lots of possibilities here as well, was he traded away? Is he pissed and taking a "personal" day?
Lots of stuff... Look for a Press Conference later and see what happens I guess... I for one think Lou wants to leave, and management is talking him out of it, as for Barrett, I have no clue.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
0 recs |
51 comments
Comments
they
by tbizzle83 on May 30, 2007 6:42 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Lou........
Lou sounded defeated last night. I think Hendry and Lou are butting heads.
As I have said 100s of times, this falls soley on the head of Jim Hendry.
by timeforachange on May 30, 2007 6:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Beat me to this......
Michael Barrett is nowhere to be found. A PR rep told reporters Barrett would not be made available.
Lou held a press conf. after the 2 hour plus meeting and said nothing. When asked about the meeting, Lou stated this was "scheduled" meeting.
IMHO, big things are going on at 1060 W. Addison. I would not be shocked if Lou threatened he would walk if Hendry did not make changes.
Wow!
by timeforachange on May 30, 2007 6:46 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I bet Hendry......
by PriorandAramisfan23 on May 30, 2007 6:48 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Yes, this is Hendry....
by DudeVf11 on May 30, 2007 11:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
maybe a two hour meeting
by Chanman25 on May 30, 2007 6:53 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Ah yes, here's the info.....
Chicago (AP) In an unprecedented move, the Cubs held a players-only meeting before the month of June.
"Usually, we don't have this meeting until mid to late June at the earliest", said a source close to the team, "but this year, we have been unusually shitty. We thought maybe this might shake things up a bit. Plus, it gives Dempster a chance to do his Piniella imitation for Marmol and Guzman." The source also said that a vote was held and "We suck" was the most popular vote for an explanation of the team's play. "It's too cold" was a close second.
Also having his own meeting was Manager Lou Piniella, but it was rumored to be concerning his current medication.
by Peoria Matt on May 30, 2007 7:05 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Hopefully it means
by CubFaninCA on May 30, 2007 7:06 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
So the game has started...
by Schwa on May 30, 2007 7:18 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
omg
by cubsluver22 on May 30, 2007 7:37 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
that bastion of sports journalism
by davidalanu on May 30, 2007 7:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can anyone...
DmL
by dmlichte on May 30, 2007 8:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That...
by Yepsen on May 30, 2007 8:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
More that he was
by davidalanu on May 30, 2007 9:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
to be more clear
by davidalanu on May 30, 2007 9:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Didn't see tonights game
by MPH73 on May 30, 2007 9:48 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I would bet Piniella called the meeting
by MPH73 on May 30, 2007 10:13 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
That was probably what he said......
by PriorandAramisfan23 on May 30, 2007 10:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
According to Carrie Muskat:
"I've got the right mix out there," Piniella said. "It's just a question of getting the job done. I haven't asked for any more pitching, one way or another. I've got five starters and bullpen kids and some are experienced, and some are young. I'm fine with it all. I think our pitching basically has done a very representative job. We've let some games get away, but what are you going to do?"
by John Q Freejazz on May 30, 2007 10:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
k
by tbizzle83 on May 31, 2007 12:57 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It can be somewhat changed...
- moving/benching our two lowest "baseball IQ" players (Barrett and Jones) and replace them with Pie and Blanco
- rearranging the lineup to include a leadoff man who fits the leadoff mentality
Theriot (good OBP)
DLee
Ramirez
Floyd
Soriano
DeRosa
Pie
Blanco
by SouthernCub on May 31, 2007 7:05 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I really......
She is worthless. What did she expect Lou to say.
Also, how odd is it that Barrett gets the night off prior to an off day?
by timeforachange on May 31, 2007 1:09 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So, Carrie, upper management had a 2 hour
My guess is that the 3 of them talked about what this team doesn't have that it needs and what this team has that it doesn't need. That sentence is hardly brain surgery in itself. I guess we will see what pans out in the next few days/weeks.
For what it's worth, I think this team has a decent amount of talent, it's just not in the right places and much of it is redundant. That plus some real bad middle relief performances. The middle relief is much better than what's been shown so far.
by NO100 on May 31, 2007 9:45 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What I find curious
I just don't quite understand.
by MPH73 on May 31, 2007 10:09 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just a guess...
DmL
by dmlichte on May 31, 2007 11:13 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You might be right
by BlueMike on May 31, 2007 11:20 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would agree with this.
It would also not surprise me to see some player move(s) made today, on the off-day.
by Al on May 31, 2007 11:42 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have no doubt
There will be moves, and some players will be benched, because they have no choice, and have nothing to lose but to let Pie play, Blanco play more, and bench Jones.
by MPH73 on May 31, 2007 12:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lou
I imagine that the meeting was a "state of the organization" meeting, trying to map out the short and long (6-18 months) future. Kenney would certainly have pertinant info in that regard.
What I think we're going to see is Lou Piniella become the defacto GM. The fact of the matter is, as Lou sat in the room with Hendry, McDonough and Kenney, that Piniella not only has the greatest chance of remaining in his current position beyond this season, he may be the only one of the four who is still employed by the Cubs 12 months from now. There is a lot of ramifications in that regard and the fact of the matter is that he likely should have the most say over what happens.
DmL
by dmlichte on May 31, 2007 12:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed 100%
He's also not going to end his baseball career by quitting 2 months into the season - and that would certainly end his career, because who would rehire a guy who'd done that?
Stone said something yesterday that I thought was interesting; he said that Pinella's tenure in Seattle started very similar to this. He started out with a mediocre, hodge-podge group, and shuffled the lineup around a ton that first year, getting a feel for who should stay and who should go. They shook things up, and 2 years later they won 100 games.
by Wreckard on May 31, 2007 4:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yabbut...
by Al on May 31, 2007 4:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
my opinion on Piniella
by MPH73 on May 31, 2007 9:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well...
I'm starting to think this meeting was about one of two things.
A. A situation revolving around Michael Barrett.
B. The top brass of the Cubs meeting for a debrief on the status of the sale of the Cubs, and what that means in terms of implications. McDonough and Hendry are surely operating in a big cloud of uncertainty. Perhaps this meeting was to clarify how things will operate in the short-term.
by BlueMike on May 31, 2007 1:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This all aired out during the McFail resignation..
by cwyers on May 31, 2007 1:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You are right on this
by BlueMike on May 31, 2007 1:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I found a transcript of
"It's easy to grin when your ship comes in and you've got the stock market beat. But the man worthwhile, is the man who can smile, when his shorts are too tight in the seat."
by cubsbak on May 31, 2007 1:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
lol
by BlueMike on May 31, 2007 1:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
FWIW...
by Al on May 31, 2007 4:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It is still......
by timeforachange on May 31, 2007 5:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's damn funny
by MPH73 on May 31, 2007 9:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
"Ok, Pookie - do the honors!"
by Shawon O Meter on Jun 1, 2007 10:55 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know where Barrett was,
by LilLPLancer23 on May 30, 2007 10:45 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Barrett needed the day off
It's all good.
by Scott G F on May 31, 2007 8:16 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Barrett
Trade the dumb-ass. If you can't trade him, then DFA. Montreal and Oakland didn't want him for a reason. And it is no coincidence that the Cubs have mightily sucked ever since he arrived in town to do the catching chores.
by BlueMike on May 31, 2007 8:56 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Just a thought
I will never forgot the bonehead move Barrett pulled in 04 against the Astros. If you recall, the Cubs were about 6-7 games up on Houston and the Stros were sinking fast. What does Barrett do? He doesn't let sleeping dogs lay, he incites a dispute during a game with Oswalt, and guess what, from that point on, the Stros woke up and eventually passed the Cubs.
The man has no feel for the game of baseball.
by MPH73 on May 31, 2007 9:22 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We could do a top 10..
I don't hate the guy personally, just wish he wasn't catcher for the Cubs..
by wicubfan on May 31, 2007 11:20 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Whatever.
DFA. Your answer to everything. How's Izturis GG chances coming?
Ignorance is bliss...
by thekansasian on May 31, 2007 5:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This shouldn't
by sue369 on May 31, 2007 7:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No coincidence we've sucked since he arrived?
And it's very obvious that MON/OAK didn't want him, right? Montreal traded him to because he was due for a big paycheck and they were, well, the Expos. So a three-team deal was made, trading him to Oakland for all of ONE DAY in December '03. Naturally Billy Beane was able to tell that Barrett smelled like cancer without even having met the kid, right?
And, naturally, it was SOLELY the Oswalt incident that caused the Astros to make up 7 games in the standings over the following months. He should have been much smarter and realized that talking mean to an opposing pitcher would have such dire consequences.
All that being said...I'm glad Lou's giving him a some time off to get his head straight.
Hey, Mike...maybe you should take a few days of vacation too? >8)
by Shawon O Meter on Jun 1, 2007 11:36 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 





















