ARod for Cedeno/Fox deal is very close
at least in my EA MVP Baseball game.
Not trying to be a jerk, but this diary is mainly a question about how to respond to rumor posts.
I'm not discounting or supporting any post. The truth of those are irrelevant to the following questions.
When seeing a rumor posted in a forum like this it seems the general consensus is to automatically give it enough merit to talk about the pros and cons of such a trade. True or not, it seems to promote good discussion as to whether or not such a deal would be "worthy." Whether or not it's a "valid rumor" (rather oxymoronic) seems to be of less importance.
Do we tend to just like these kinds of rumors? Giving them more leeway than other types of posts just because we like to debate the theoretical issues?
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
0 recs |
34 comments
Comments
Darn
Maybe if they don't want Cedeno for A-Rod, they'd take Murton for him.
by danimal15 on Jul 24, 2007 2:50 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Oh man...
by grogg2434 on Jul 24, 2007 2:52 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
That's kinda the point of the post
The Dunn post, while potentially valid, garners so much attention because it satiates our needs for some news... any news.
by stelmodad on Jul 24, 2007 2:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you said you arnt trying to be a jerk?
by Kchance on Jul 24, 2007 2:56 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Not the point of the diary
by stelmodad on Jul 24, 2007 3:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The last post...
by Damen Jackson on Jul 24, 2007 3:01 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Excellent point...
by HIGGY on Jul 24, 2007 3:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed...
by BillHoldenFan on Jul 24, 2007 3:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Again, this isn't a post against PA
by stelmodad on Jul 24, 2007 3:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That was me
by indytaz on Jul 24, 2007 4:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dunn
by PittsburghPA on Jul 24, 2007 3:05 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't believe this.
by cwyers on Jul 24, 2007 3:07 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
hahaha
by bennyha on Jul 24, 2007 3:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
By far the best baseball ever
by DTJchris on Jul 24, 2007 3:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i agree
by bennyha on Jul 24, 2007 3:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
agreeing with you on all counts
by DTJchris on Jul 24, 2007 4:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well then
What was the 'charity dinner' for and where was it?
You made this whole thing up, PA -- for attention.
And, unfortunately, you are getting it.
I think you are trying to see if the MSM picks this up -- as that Milwaukee radio station did -- what, 2 weeks ago -- about a trade that the "Brewers were about to make" -- and didn't it involve the Reds?
Didn't the station have to apologize for wrong info?
Is this Trade-scam part 2?
by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Jul 24, 2007 3:40 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
He doesn't owe you a thing
For the record, I'm not buying his story, but not because he's given me any reason to think he's lying. He said a friend of his was talking to an unnamed family member of Dunn. It's certainly possible that that person said that and that they are wrong, but that doesn't make PA a liar.
by Porfi on Jul 24, 2007 4:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
h
- My friend did not tell me exactly which family member it was. I plan on calling him later and getting more details on these things.
- Also don't know much more about the charity dinner, other than it was in Texas, where Dunn and his family are from. Again, I will contact him at some point to find these things out.
by PittsburghPA on Jul 24, 2007 3:48 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm sorry if this post seemed to be a slight
To help folks see what the heck I was asking, I'll edit the post and remove any reference to you.
by stelmodad on Jul 24, 2007 3:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's a rumor...take it for what it's worth.
by bergs55 on Jul 24, 2007 3:54 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
You are misrepresenting...
Inquiries were made. Nothing happened. But I never said he was coming here. Here is the post I made on this topic last July 2.
If this person has actually spoken to someone who's heard this directly from Dunn, that's at least worth discussing.
by Al on Jul 24, 2007 4:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's what I meant...
by bergs55 on Jul 24, 2007 4:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Then
by jazzypete on Jul 24, 2007 4:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I dunno.
Sorry.
Anyway, I'm skeptical too, but who knows? Maybe it has legs. We'll see.
by Al on Jul 24, 2007 5:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Al....
by DTJchris on Jul 24, 2007 7:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, I said I was sorry...
by Al on Jul 25, 2007 4:03 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know Al, trust his sources
This is just made up out of thin air.
I may have been born yesterday, but I wasn't born last night.
by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Jul 24, 2007 4:00 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
stelmodad:
It reminds me of what some artist said about how he doesn't intend to just create something beautiful. Rather he wanted to create something that evoked a strong emotional reaction.
by BlueSox on Jul 24, 2007 4:28 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I think
by jazzypete on Jul 24, 2007 4:30 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I hear you, but I wasn't trying to make any point
Do we need them to be true? Do we need them to exist? Do we start with cynicism and then go from there or start with belief and wait till we hear otherwise?
by stelmodad on Jul 24, 2007 4:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
In a Kansas paper...
All I'm saying is that there are sources who leak things out on purpose and sources that get kicks from spreading rumors. It's just how blogs work. Not condemning PA, but it's out there.
by thekansasian on Jul 24, 2007 5:31 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 



















