Look, I'm tired of the Roberts/Bedard to Cubs or Bedard to Cubs or Roberts to Cubs, ect... too.
But I stumbled across this article and it got me thinking.
Seems as if the Cub's FO as well their fans are desperate after the Santana trade. Not me so much. (Remember what Zito was to be for the Giants). But is it possible that the Cubs need to make a move to trump the Mets?
Greg Couch of the Sun Times sums it up best. This is a great way to put it: "''We continue to talk,'' Orioles president Andy MacPhail, who could do more for the Cubs right now than he ever did when he worked for them, told the Baltimore Sun. ''We've had some other clubs chime in, as well.''
Yes, Any McPhail could help us out more now than when he was with the Cubs. So, is this a precursor to a Bedard/Roberts deal? Why is the deal to the Mariners stalled for the moment?
Do the Cubs need to make the Bedard/Roberts deal to trump the Mets (and the rest of the NL)
Yes (36 votes)
No (27 votes)
Not this deal but another (14 votes)
77 total votes