I’d like to see Hendry with at least a couple of years so he could make some longterm plans, especially with signings and/or trades possible this weekend.

Two more years seems quite reasonable.

to cover through 2010 and match LOU, as you stated.

Now who knows what a new owner would do and if they didn’t, what about all the support staff?

If memory serves, aren’t both Lee’s and Ramirez’s contracts up in 2010 as well?

although I have my doubts Lou lasts that long. Not that he’d get fired, which he won’t, but that he’ll retire.

This way he can continue building, with more eyes to find the talent the team is looking for long-term.

as far as individual players goes—-its all about timing and availability. take last year for example—we needed a left handed power bat who played right field. plus we wanted some good def to boot. dome was the best available and hendry did what it took to get him.

same goes for sori! when it was time to re-up lee.rami,big z we all agreed. bad thing about it all is—its kinda like a poker game. you think your doing the right thing, but you just never know. overall hendry has used his money very wisely. I can sit here and throw out more good things he’s done than bad. he’s done his job and deserves reward. hindsight is 20/20. most of us would have done exactly the same as it pertains for what accounts to most of the payroll we are using.

If this means the Cubs run the risk of losing Hendry then so be it. Hendry is not as “in demand” as some would like to suggest in my opinion.

To my knowledge the only teams currently in the market for a GM are Seattle (which already is operating with a short list of candidates) and potentially the NY Yankees if the Steinbrenners can’t lock up Brian Cashman.

Plus Hendry’s record of accomplishment is spotty.

1. Doesn’t take a particularly bright GM to hand over fat checks to free agents. The signings of Soriano and Kosuke aren’t exactly sterling accomplishments for Hendry either. He didn’t do his homework on Soriano and was more intent on making a big splash with his signing as opposed to making an intelligent major addition to the ballclub.

2. Hendry’s trading record is mediocre. He traded Hundley to the Dodgers in a 100% salary swap for Karros and Grudzielanek, two players that LA was anxious to shed. His other marquee moves were the addition of Derrek Lee and the addition of Aramis Ramirez. But for as great as those two trades were it can’t be forgotten that Florida and Pittsburgh were in active payroll shedding mode when those deals were consummated. Hendry’s other trades? Well, nothing where you would say he came out the clear winner in the deal or stole a player from somebody else. Ricky Nolasco sure would look good in a Cub uniform right now don’t you think?

3. The Cub farm system continues to suck despite the fact that Hendry’s involvement with the Cub minor leagues dates back to the mid 90’s.

===

So in conclusion I tell Hendry to chill. Let the new ownership group make evaluation and install their own front office strategy. Maybe they keep Hendry, maybe they don’t.

for a contract extension for Hendry. The playoff performance does bother me immensely. I can’t remember a GM or whatever his official title is for the Cubs being as good as he is. The talent level is high for the Cubs.

The only thing I can think to change is for the Cubs to view the season in four parts (the regular season, the division series, the LCS, and the World Series). The Cubs need to understand that the first game of the division series should be treated as a new opening day. Teams don’t get awarded a 2 games to nothing lead in the division series for having the league’s best record.

we are always focusing on yesterday and yesteryear. until we constantly look forward and quit worrying about trying to correct our past, we will NEVER win