Bleed Cubbie Blue: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: SB Nation NBA Power Rankings for Week 2

TBS cherrypicks stats to encourage ledge-jumping

I got out of class last night about the sixth inning and went down to the student center to get a bite to eat (I'm a grad student, that's about as nice as it gets). I was disappointed to be missing most of the game, but hell I've been a Cubs fan for twenty years, I've learned a thing or two about waiting. The game was on the TV down in the UC, and as you all know by now, the Cubs got beat fairly convincingly by LA. But I was listening to the TBS broadcast, and they displayed a stat that most likely was designed to make defeatist Cubs fans squirm. They said something like this: out of 28 division series, the team who won the first game went on to win the series 24 times. I felt terrible after hearing that, and I wanted nothing more than to go and feel sorry for myself and my team. I said out loud with several people listening, "That's a pretty convincing stat." Tony Gwynn, whom I respect both as a player and an analyst, said something like "You've got to win this game" after he heard those numbers.

TBS duped a hall of famer. And probably everybody else who watched that game on TBS.

So I came to the library to work on a paper that's due tomorrow. But I couldn't stop thinking about that number! 24 out of 28! Statistically, then, the Dodgers have like a 91% chance of winning the series. Feeling even worse, I went to the baseball fan's ultimate website: baseballreference.com to see these numbers for myself.

Suddenly I realized that TBS was VERY misleading in their presentation of those numbers, or they outright lied to make being a Cubs fan seem futile. First of all, those were the last 28 series (I'm guessing, they never made that clear). There have been 48 LDS series played in total! Now, I'm a historian, not a statistician, but something seems ass-backwards about those numbers. As a grad student, if I cherry picked numbers like that and somebody went to check up on me, that would come close to constituting MISCONDUCT. Like bad enough to ruin your academic reputation for life if you aren't removed from your graduate program or dropped from your thesis/dissertation committee first.

Here is the total breakdown:
Teams who LOST Game 1, but still won the LDS: 16.
Teams who WON Game 1, and went to win the series 32.

Statistically then, the Cubs have a 33% chance of pulling this thing off. Not 8.5% as TBS would have you believe!

But Cubs fans -- there's more!
Those 32 Series.
19 were sweeps.
13 were split.

This might be poor stats for a math major, but it works for a historian and it's not too far off the mark. Let's discount the sweeps and chaulk those up to one team being overmatched -- in three game playoff sweeps, that's usually, but not always, the case. We are left with 29 (oddly close to TBS's figure of 28) series, 16 of which the loser of the first game went on to win. That means, if the Cubs and Dodgers are evenly matched which is a fair claim, the Cubs, statistically speaking, have a 55.2% chance of going to the NLCS.

The real point of these numbers is this: tomorrow's game is the most important in the series. Only once has a team fallen 2-0 and still won the LDS. That team? The 1995 Seattle Mariners, managed by (this is too good) Lou Piniella.

Go Cubs!

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.

7 recs  |  Comment 34 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Good Work

I found that stat a little hard to believe.

"Destiny is a matter of choice, not chance"

by MerlinDog on Oct 2, 2008 9:38 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Well done.

I was wondering about that too.

28/4=7. So that would be since 2001. They never said that.

by CrashDavis on Oct 2, 2008 9:41 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I think what they did

Was only include the NLDS. I’m not sure why, except to make it seem more dramatic. I know there are differences between the NL and AL, but nothing off-hand that I can think of that would make it easier for a Game 1 loser in the AL to ultimately win the series.

I was as depressed and downtrodden as anyone after last night, but I am still not ready to throw in the towel. I am greatly anticipating tonight’s game.

Go Cubs!

by SuperContext on Oct 2, 2008 9:53 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Make that twice...

2003 Boston Red Sox came back from 2-0 against the Oakland A’s. Granted, they lost the first two games on the road (not at home), but that’s not real worrisome.

The Cubs have a better team in just about every aspect, and have a great chance to win this series.

--www.AddictedToQuack.com, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Oct 2, 2008 9:53 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

And thus those Red Sox...

… had to win game 5 on the road, too.

This is a different series with different teams than all the ones before.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Oct 2, 2008 9:54 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks

Yes, you were right. I was committing that from memory, not fact-checking like the rest of the post, and I had forgot about the 2003 ALDS. Thanks for clearing that up.

by WCUBishop on Oct 2, 2008 10:31 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Your statistic about the odds being about 33% are reasonable

For example, assuming even odds (p = 0.5) from the Binomial Distribution, the probability P that the Cubs win 3 of the next 4 games is:

P(3 games out of next 4) = 4!/( 3! * 1!) times (0.5)*(0.5)* (0.5)*(0.5)

which gives 25% probability. This of course assumes that the odds are even (p=0.5) so that the Cubs and Dodgers are evenly matched everywhere (pitching matchups, home field advantage nonexistent, etc., etc.). Since the Cubs (IMHO) are the better team, assuming 33% probability is probably reasonable….but I didn’t take into account The Curse :-)

"I'm not much of a chemistry guy, you know. Chemistry to me is a pinch-hit double with the bases loaded"--Jim Frey, Chicago Tribune, 1985.

by zevkalman on Oct 2, 2008 10:11 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

More about TBS

Dick Stockton is the worse baseball announcer I have ever heard. Watch and listen, you’ll be amazed.

They were "Cubbed". Any team that gets beat late by the Cubs.

by flacub08 on Oct 2, 2008 10:40 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm glad I don't have to listen to him.

Field reports from all of you seem unanimous — he’s horrible. How TBS can hire a guy this bad is beyond me.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Oct 2, 2008 10:42 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

TBS cherry-picks its announcers so they don't ask a lot in salary--Stockton is a bargain :-)

"I'm not much of a chemistry guy, you know. Chemistry to me is a pinch-hit double with the bases loaded"--Jim Frey, Chicago Tribune, 1985.

by zevkalman on Oct 2, 2008 10:45 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Stocken is awful

but I think I’d rather listen him then Joe Morgan.

"Destiny is a matter of choice, not chance"

by MerlinDog on Oct 2, 2008 11:56 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I thought he was wonderful

full of good info and easy to listen too, wait no, I got mixed up, pulled a stockton, sorry.

by JPetey on Oct 2, 2008 11:17 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wonder how did they hire Tony Gwynn?

All he says is that he agrees with Ron Darling (the only bright spot in that broadcast). It’s too bad about Stockton. He used to do the Red Sox games in the early 70’s but now appears to be way past his prime baseball wise. He should stick to football and basketball.

by Fraggin Judge on Oct 2, 2008 3:35 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's reason enough for you to go to the games in LA

I watched him on Game 1. (Flew in for Game 2.)

He just goes from bad to worse. Listening to him is like rubbing salt in the wound that is the Cubs loss.

Eamus Catuli!

by wrigley_boy on Oct 3, 2008 3:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Stockton....

Stockton is no prize. But the worst baseball announcer around is Tim McCarver.
One time during that that dreadful 2006 season, I heard McCarver announcing a Cubs/Braves game from Wrigley Field. Cedeno made a mental gaff, and McCarver had the insight to sayt these words: “Fundamentals are a fundamental part of playing baseball.” We are all less intellegent for listening to McCarver.

by WCUBishop on Oct 2, 2008 11:29 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

During the clinch game...

The whole Budweiser roof tarp story was brought up… and McCarver stated that until the day before the clinching game, the Budweiser roof had been covered up by a tarp for the last 3 months.

by MillsChC on Oct 2, 2008 2:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You didn't hear him when the Phillies clinched this year.

The play by play announcer went to the field and they left Mccarver to call the 9th inning. At one point he had the wrong player running the bases.

by Fraggin Judge on Oct 2, 2008 3:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

What about his announcing the Cubs' games last season?

He made mistake after mistake. He made the following errors at some point or another last year: 1) The Chicago Cowboys. 2) Angel Pecan(He said it like the nut) 3) Adolpho Soriano. He also referred to Donte Rosario of the Panthers as Rosario Dawson. He is losing his mind, and thats being nice.

by dakoose on Oct 2, 2008 5:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well done.

You’re my hero today.

make*art

by neverAcquiesce on Oct 2, 2008 11:56 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Prospectus

After winning game one, Prospectus gives the Dodgers the edge on the series at 61.8%. Let’s be confident that Good Z shows up, that Harden can give us 6 innings on Saturday and the rest is ours.

by morgane on Oct 2, 2008 2:14 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

How about this...

Worry less about the TBS announcers. Worry more about the Cubs winning playoff baseball games. Dick Stockton sucks and is what he is. You and I aren’t going to change it. It’s like having a debate on how much Mary Todd Lincoln liked the play after Abe took a few bullets in the back.

Oh please let this dubious bullpen be good enough in the playoffs...

by MDBNIU on Oct 2, 2008 3:32 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

He only took one bullet

and it was in the head…..right behind the ear.

Nothin'. A handful of nothin'. You stupid mullet head. He beat you with nothin'. Just like today when he kept comin' back at me......with nothin'.

Yeah, well, sometimes nothin' can be a real cool hand.

by Tackle Box on Oct 2, 2008 7:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The thing people forget is this

Sports are NOT like flipping a coin or rolling dice. The probability in these sorts of things goes out the window. Nothing is assured. That’s why they play the games, to coin a phrase.

You can perhaps apply mathematical principles to individual stats, but not to whether a team wins or loses. If we could do that, nobody would watch, because victory or defeat would be preordained.

by Not Bruce Froemming on Oct 2, 2008 3:50 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Well done.

Thank you very much!

by AeroZach on Oct 2, 2008 4:59 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Good point, but you're a little off...

My job in television is exactly that – to get the graphics, think them up, have them built in the computers, watch the game, and then get them on the screen.

Many graphics like that are not made with fans in mind… they are simply made before the game (usually many many hours or even days… for me, I am at every game 6-8 hours prior to its start just making graphics, sometimes we make them days in advance) and on the rundown (what is going into the game, what they want to do, profile, etc.) it will say something like “NLDS historical stats” or something like that.

Not to get too much into live TV production, but my point is that graphic was going on the air anyway, no matter who won.

Make it happen baby: Cubs, Jaguars, FSU, Jazz, Thrashers.

by camnorris14 on Oct 2, 2008 6:05 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

However! (Stephen A. Smith style)

That does not excuse them simply getting the facts wrong. The producer or font coordinator (what I just described above) are responsible for the factual accuracy of the graphics.

Make it happen baby: Cubs, Jaguars, FSU, Jazz, Thrashers.

by camnorris14 on Oct 2, 2008 6:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

TBS broadcast is terrible

It’s like they just make shit up with nothing to back it up. They say completely wrong things and don’t correct themselves. They said something about Fukudome endeering himself to the fans with a walk off home run against the Brewers. That was a game tying home run. They said yesterday that someone had gone 0 for 4 with a single in game one. These are just a couple examples but i felt like i was correcting them to myself. Everything they said was at least a little bit inaccurate. Stockton is terrible, Darling is just as bad and Tony Gwynn was one hell of a baseball player.

2008 National League Central Division Champs!!!!!

by BradB311 on Oct 3, 2008 9:44 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

...

len and bob need to webcast during the next postseason.

it just doesnt feel right without them.

my stuff is filthy

by carlos marmol on Oct 6, 2008 8:37 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon
Start posting about the Cubs »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

66103_small
The Ordinary Wizarding Levels of Milton Bradley & the 2009 Chicago Cubs
Chicagocubs1914_small
OT: Big-Ten, Vista-Demolition, Bad-News-Bears, Anything-Goes-on-a-Weekend Game Thread
Jake_fox_small
Cubs Should Go After Rich Hill
Chicagocubs1914_small
Last Out to First Pitch – The 2009-10 Offseason IT'S HAPPENING!!!??? Contest
Small
More From the Cubs in Winter Ball

Recent FanPosts

Dscn2381_small
The Only CF That Fits for 2010
Small
Bradley For Millwood?
Fukudome_bleachers_small
The Top 10 Cubs Games of 2009
Sandberg94home_small
An argument for Mike Cameron
P272649reg_small
OT: How will the Big Ten wind up and who goes where?
Small
Should we trade him, or should we not?
Madduxflag_small
Starlin Castro Vitters etc LIVE Sat night
Helmet_small
Az Fall League Cubs

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Gomez to drink your Brew, Hardy to eat your Twinkie
BP interviews Sam Fuld. Great read!
Who was the best MLB player born on your birthday?

Recent FanShots

Jeter wins Gold Glove, &#(#&^$*@!!
Ranking Top Free Agents
Wow! Look at Sosa
No instant replay upcoming
Marlon Byrd to the Cubs??
Rumorville
Should Cubs pursue another lefty Cardinals CF
Job Opening with the Cubs
Cubs trying hard to trade Bradley
Victor Zambrano's mother kidnapped in Venezuela

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

It Is Only...

Cubs By The Numbers

Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.

Click here to order your copy, available now!

SPONSORS

Recent Stories in Ticket Exchanges

Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: Cubs Convention 2010
Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: General 2009 Ticket Exchange
Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: September 29-October 4 Homestand

Managing Editor

Yelloncard_small Al

Editorial Cartoonist

Toonmike_small toonmike

Contributors

Dsc_0139_small holy mackerel

100px-boisehawkscaplogo_small Josh77

Small shawndgoldman