Alfonso Soriano
So I already realize im gonna get alot of people who disagree with me but im gonna say it anyway. What is so bad about Alfonso Soriano, apart from the post season problems have we forgotten how much he helped us in the past two seasons?
He missed 6 weeks this year and still leading the team in home runs and having a .280 batting average (imagine if he played all year.) I just fail to see how some of you think he needs to be moved. Yes I realize that he goes really hot then really cold but no one ever mentions those stretches where he just does what he needs to do. His confidence on the base paths returned the second half of this season, and he was taking more risks in my opinion he is going to continue to become the base runner he used to be. His fielding is terrible at times, and I think its something that he probably realizes and will try to work on it in the off season, I don't really see him as a lazy player.
So maybe my opinion is biased as he is one of my favorite players, he makes sitting in the left field bleachers very enjoyable. But I just had to say something because reading some posts around here the picture I get in my head is a bunch of angry Cubs fans with torches and pick forks running him out of town. I'll keep my mind open to your guys' thoughts on why he should be moved thats why I wanted to make this post.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
152 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
He has shown the same major problem for his entire career...
he has bad plate discipline. He can’t lay off pitches out of the strike zone. He hasn’t ever tried to get “better” at that aspect of his game…and it’s the only thing really holding him back.
As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.
by santoswoodenlegs on Oct 6, 2008 6:08 PM CDT reply actions
To take the topic off the Cubs futility
just noticed your new photo. And then when I clicked on it, you’ve posted over 11,000. Congrats SWL, and I can honestly say that I have enjoyed all of them.
"Prince Fielder Dies Of Inside-The-Park Homerun" - The Onion
Thanks, what do I win? One more offseason of wondering what could have been.
As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.
by santoswoodenlegs on Oct 6, 2008 6:15 PM CDT up reply actions
I think he can still have value
just not as a lead off hitter.
"Destiny is a matter of choice, not chance"
+1
I would like him a lot better at 5 or 6.
But would that ever happen?
He wants to be the leadoff hitter, and everything that I’ve seen suggested that he takes it as a personal slight if he were to move down. While he carries the team when he’s hot, when he’s cold, he is a selfish player who doesn’t rise to the occation when challenged, he just gets indignant.
by chitownhawkeye on Oct 6, 2008 7:10 PM CDT up reply actions
I am hoping that Soriano lost that leverage after tanking again in the post season.
Actually after not showing up in the post season. I think that it is no longer what he wants to do but what the cubs management want him to do. In other words his honeymoon might be over.
If I were Hendry I'd be pissed that Sori said that the team was not built for
“sprints”. Pretty classless.
"I'm not much of a chemistry guy, you know. Chemistry to me is a pinch-hit double with the bases loaded"--Jim Frey, Chicago Tribune, 1985.
Unlilke fans
Unlike fans who blow up every single thing a player says Hendry knows players speak out of frustration and upset.
Oh I forgot we have idiots who think the players don’t care they lost.
Thngs of worth are worth fighting for regardless of the odds.
by puckishcubsfan on Oct 6, 2008 8:10 PM CDT up reply actions
+25
Soriano does NOT need to ever be locked into leadoff again. Throughout the last two years of deference, Lou has let him assign himself where ever.
Now that both Lou and Soriano are going to be around a couple more years at least, it’s time that Lou bite the bullet and realize that Soriano’s bat can be useful all over that lineup .. never again exclusively at the top of it. He’s still a heck of a player, but we got little more than that when he went cold as ice two years running when we needed him.
Well, Next Year is here .. and Jack's century's gotta end some time .. GO CUBBIES!
forgot to mention
His arm, he has a cannon and its usually acurate.. causing runners to think twice of running on a ball hit to left.
"You must try to generate happiness within yourself. If you aren't happy in one place, chances are you won't be happy anyplace."
he doesn't have a cannon...
…in fact he has a very weak throwing arm. I suspect your looking at all his assists and assuming he has a rocket. He does have an accurate arm and he gets rid of the ball as quickly as any outfielder that I’ve ever seen, which is probably a by-product of playing second base for all those years.
People run on him a lot, which helps explain the high assist totals.
"Some people will look at a glass of water and say it's half-empty, while another guy will look at it and say it's half-full. A Cubs fan looks at the same glass and asks, "When's it gonna spill?" - Mike Royko
by LaddieRenfroe on Oct 6, 2008 6:46 PM CDT up reply actions
I say he has a cannon from watching him in mid-deep left feild throw it home on a one bouncer, if thats not a strong arm then I don’t know what is,
"You must try to generate happiness within yourself. If you aren't happy in one place, chances are you won't be happy anyplace."
so he got the ball home...
…and it only bounced once. That doesn’t mean that it was a really throw. It very well may have been accurate and nailed a runner that took a risk, but you have to look at the trajectory and not merely the place that the ball landed. Again, his trick is to get rid of the ball very quickly and, in doing that, he makes up for the lack of strength.
I could probably one-hop a ball in from mid-left but the problem is that I’d have to throw the ball on a big lollipop trajectory and the runner gains an advantage from that, not to mention that I’d miss a cutoff man. Next time you see Fukudome throw home, note how the ball is thrown low and hard on a line…compare to that to the higher arc on Soriano’s throws.
"Some people will look at a glass of water and say it's half-empty, while another guy will look at it and say it's half-full. A Cubs fan looks at the same glass and asks, "When's it gonna spill?" - Mike Royko
by LaddieRenfroe on Oct 6, 2008 6:59 PM CDT up reply actions
A very weak throwing arm?
I don’t know who you’ve been watching, his throws aren’t lollipops.
For your information, the Supreme Court has roundly rejected prior restraint.
by Less is Walrond on Oct 6, 2008 7:44 PM CDT up reply actions
It's not his arm, but how fast he gets it out
He doesn’t need much of a wind-up which gives him about .5 seconds extra for the assist. That 0.5 seconds gets the players out who try and test him.
ummm....
As Nittany Cub points out just above this, he gets rid of the ball very quickly, which helps to compensate for the lack of arm strength. He almost slings it sidearm, as if he’s turning a DP at second.
Put it this way – there are three components to judging an OF’s arm, 1) strength, 2) release time, and 3) accuracy. From what I’ve seen, Soriano is sorely lacking in true arm strength, the first component, but he releases the ball so quickly, and often throws accurately, that he is able to throw out a lot of runners. In other words, he throws effectively but that isn’t due to the strength of his arm. Plus, guys seem to run on him a lot and have ever since he moved to LF back in 2006. I’ve always wondered when they’ll get the memo that, just because his arm is weak, he can still cut them down.
If you’re absolutely convinced that he has a gun, as both Less and AlltheWay seem to be, I doubt that I can convince you otherwise.
"Some people will look at a glass of water and say it's half-empty, while another guy will look at it and say it's half-full. A Cubs fan looks at the same glass and asks, "When's it gonna spill?" - Mike Royko
by LaddieRenfroe on Oct 6, 2008 10:28 PM CDT up reply actions
The important point is results. There are plenty
of players with guns for arms who can hit the seat in section 110 behind the dugout easily and they do it with regularity. Arm strength is only one part of outfield defense. Your argument is pretty weak when you say he doesn’t have a strong arm but he throws a lot of guys out. The point of the exercise is to THROW RUNNERS OUT!
For a LF, arm strength is probably the least important quality. It’s not wise for runners to keep running on Soriano because of his high percentage of nailing them, but there are a lot of stupid baserunners and third base coaches. I say, let em keep trying.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Oct 7, 2008 8:54 AM CDT up reply actions
Yeah he has a great arm
3B coaches pretty much stopped sending or waiving through runners if Soriano was catching the ball anywhere closer than 10ft from the track. His throws were great all year. As a matter od fact, the Cubs’ OF play from left to right was pretty great all year long.
"I'll take one in the mouth over the eyes any day". - AJ Pierzynski
http://lostinthevines.blogspot.com/
by lostinthevines on Oct 7, 2008 2:22 PM CDT up reply actions
Fail
"I'll take one in the mouth over the eyes any day". - AJ Pierzynski
http://lostinthevines.blogspot.com/
by lostinthevines on Oct 7, 2008 2:23 PM CDT up reply actions
When Soriano was signed
The Cubs were worried about just getting to the playoffs. Soriano has helped them big time in that regard.
Now people feel we can’t get past the first round, so we need the ‘perfect’ first round player. Soriano is not that guy because of his poor playoff stats.
People can’t seem to get the idea that playoffs are VERY small sample size and while there is something to Soriano not being able to hit good-great pitching (playoff pitchers), you gotta get to the friggin’ playoffs first.
"and while there is something to Soriano not being able to hit ..."
The problem is loud and clear. He is an undisciplined hitter who is stubborn in his rigid ways.
Soriano in the post-season...
I posted on his post-season performances earlier in a different thread, the last comment here. I won’t re-post it but I looked through his gamelogs and noticed that, while his stats are lousy on balance, he came up with a series of huge hits when he was a Yankee.
My point was basically the same as yours, that even if he has lousy stats and looked bad in his last six post-season games, we’re looking at this through such a narrow lens and with so much inherent frustration that it can’t be considered objective. Rather, those clutch hits just illustrate that there’s a devil’s-advocate argument that takes some of the air out of these gut reactions.
"Some people will look at a glass of water and say it's half-empty, while another guy will look at it and say it's half-full. A Cubs fan looks at the same glass and asks, "When's it gonna spill?" - Mike Royko
by LaddieRenfroe on Oct 6, 2008 6:54 PM CDT up reply actions
I posted this multiple times in other threads but the problem with Alfonso Soriano
is that he is an undisciplined hitter. He doesn’t adapt to the situation very well and thrives on pitchers making mistakes rather than forcing the pitcher to throw the pitch he can handle. He doesn’t work the count and if he is in a slump he seldom goes the opposite way. He doesn’t do the simple things like moving a runner over. So all in all he is a very unreliable hitter and the Cubs simply cannot depend on him to be THE guy in the lineup.
Having said all that he is the only real power threat in the lineup and as such he is a misfit in the lead off slot. In big game situations pitchers do not make mistakes and actually need not pitch a fast ball to him with him being on the base consistently without any runners on base and with no real power threats in the 2nd and 3 holes in the lineup.
So the solution would be to move Soriano to the number 3 hole or number 5 hole and design a situation wherein we DO NOT have to depend on him because like Ramirez chances are that he will not come through with any kind of pressure on him. This requires us to get an absolute spark plug to fill the lead off spot or to get a big reliable lefty power bat.
The other thing
I’m not sure we had a better leadoff option on the roster.
Why don’t we ever read about Sandberg refusing to move over to 3rd later in his career? Or Grace refusing to leave the #3 hole?
Thngs of worth are worth fighting for regardless of the odds.
by puckishcubsfan on Oct 6, 2008 8:11 PM CDT up reply actions
aramis ramirez
isnt a power threat??? cmon be realistic with your comments
I BELIEVE!!!! GO CUBBIES!!!!!!!!!!
Ramirez cannot carry a team on his back the way Soriano can when he is in one of his patented
hot streaks.
When the game is on the line
I’d rather have Ramirez at the dish than Soriano any day, whether he’s in a “patented hot streak” or not.
"Yes, dear. You're right. I'm sorry." -Bob Brenly
by ambrosiadreams on Oct 6, 2008 7:12 PM CDT up reply actions
I cannot fault you with that. Actually 99.5% of cub fans including myself feel the same.
With Soriano at the plate you simply do not get the same feeling of security because his performances are like a sine wave whereas Ramirez hovers around the mean most of the time.
IIRC, Ramirez hits a lot of HR's and RBI's in the late innings
So I would rather have him hitting 99% of the time.
Sori showed at times he could take a walk, but he still is a free swinger. My one bitch about him is his speed, he never was a threat on the bases this year. I know he had lingering leg probs, but not one darn triple from him.
He is what he is. The problem with moving him down in the order is that he doesn’t hit there. If he could begin to hit at the 5 or 6 hole, then we could go for a classic leadoff man. Until then, we’re stuck with Mr. No Hit In October Soriano.
"WGN, Channel 9 Cubs Baseball, Excitingly, Importantly, Dramatically Yours." - Jack Brickhouse
He hits adequately there. Look at his numbers with Washington and Texas.
Soriano desn’t like to hit lower in the order but he has proved in the past that he can do it.
by Fraggin Judge on Oct 7, 2008 7:21 AM CDT up reply actions
Maybe what I should have said
was that he didn’t hit well lower in the order with the Cubs. It may be just my perception, but Lou tried him lower and he really never got going. I don’t have any numbers to show his stats not in the lead off position, but I guess if he was hitting in other slots in the lineup, Lou would have kept him there.
All in all, I feel Rammy is a much better hitter in clutch situaltions. He works counts, and K’s less than Sori.
"WGN, Channel 9 Cubs Baseball, Excitingly, Importantly, Dramatically Yours." - Jack Brickhouse
That's a ludiccrous comment.
His BA after the 7th in 2-or-fewer – run games was .402 w/ 8HRs and 27 RBIs. THAT is clutch.
The operative word in your comment is “streak”; the whole idea of being an ecffective lead-off guy is CONSISTENTLY GETTING ON BASE; not swinging for the fences every AB the way Snoiano does
"I'll take one in the mouth over the eyes any day". - AJ Pierzynski
http://lostinthevines.blogspot.com/
by lostinthevines on Oct 7, 2008 2:29 PM CDT up reply actions
In My Opinion...
we seem to forget that Soriano was signed as a free agent after posting a 40/40 season in Washington. He has yet to put up those kind of numbers for the Cubs, and with his leg injuries the past two years I doubt that he will ever again. YES, when he is hot he is the hottest hitter on the planet, but those three stretches a year don’t make up for his cold, cold streaks (which seem to last about twice as long), and his poor defense in left. Yes, he does have a good arm, but i’d rather not see him botch routine fly balls and have an average arm.
That being said, Soriano is NOT the end-all-be-all problem with the Cubs. It’s just his stubborness to only want to hit lead-off, and his refusal to adjust to breaking balls, gets unnerving sometimes. It’s also frustrating to some fans, I’m sure, that he really isn’t producing up to his huge contract that Hendry gave him.
"Yes, dear. You're right. I'm sorry." -Bob Brenly
agreed.
With the way the rest of the team is built Soriano is a misfit in this cubs lineup. We have a few hitters in our line up but we DO NOT have an OFFENSE. Our offense is still a feast or famine lineup with Soriano as the poster boy.
Ummm... no
Best OBP is baesball does represent feast or famine. Most runs scored in baseball does not represent feast or famine. I would love for you to find a team more consistent in scoring runs than the 2008 Chicago Cubs.
by IllinoisCubs on Oct 6, 2008 10:13 PM CDT up reply actions
Maybe he was talking about stranded runners, 'cuz
we sure did seem to have more than our fair share of thise this year
"I'll take one in the mouth over the eyes any day". - AJ Pierzynski
http://lostinthevines.blogspot.com/
by lostinthevines on Oct 7, 2008 2:30 PM CDT up reply actions
He has said that he will hit wherever Lou says he wants him to
the problem is he doesn’t hit anywhere else except at the top.
"WGN, Channel 9 Cubs Baseball, Excitingly, Importantly, Dramatically Yours." - Jack Brickhouse
Again, that is a myth.
Carreer numbers:
Hitting:
3rd: 630 AB, .260/.310/.452, 92 RBI
5th: 583 AB, .268/.312/.513, 107 RBI
He appears to be better hitting first, but that’s because he has 3 times the at bats hitting first. But I’d take the numbers above from my # 5 hitter.
by Fraggin Judge on Oct 7, 2008 7:24 AM CDT up reply actions
I have stated this many times before...
…and folks just choose to ignore it for whatever reason. Tell me how many clubs would take a .513 slugging % and 107 RBI’s out of the five position and I think that answer is obvious.
A players talent will come through no matter what position they are in. It may take a slight adjustment period, but you can’t keep continuing on this Soriano as leadoff man path. I know the Cubs haven’t had a typical leadoff man (High OBP, Good baserunner) type guy since Lofton, but certainly Theriot was probably a better pick in this spot than Soriano. I am unclear as to what the dynamics are as to why they left Soriano leading off as long as they did (when they signed him, I thought he would evenutally hit lower). It is the fact that Hendry promised Soriano he would be their leadoff man? Is it Lou not wanting to upset Soriano’s delicate psychy? It could be a blend of both, I don’t know, but I would imagine Lou is through playing games with this.
Obviously, they recognized this last year by going after Roberts (unless they planned to hit him second, which is possible), but I think it is the number one priority going into the offseason.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
I don't
think there is any reason we should ship him out of town. As its been stated how many times; just move him down the order. He’s still an offensive threat. Just not a leadoff hitter. I think people wouldn’t feel quite has poorly toward him if he didn’t hit lead off. I would have no problem with a lineup consisting of Aram 4, Soriano 5, and Lee 6.
Its funny, you spend most of your life gripping a baseball. And in the end, its almost always the other way around.
I agree, but believe Soriano should be at best #5
probably #6. 3 and 4 need to be reserved for guys that consistantly produce. Soriano is too streaky to be the heart of the order.
My issue is that he occupies too much salary. His production at #6 making 10m a year makes him the fan favorite. For 20% of the payroll, I want more.
But the wind blew me back via Chicago, In the middle of the night
tWO THINGS
One the main reason not to get rid of him is so many fans and the entire Chicago media want him gone. That’s enough reason not to get rid of him,’
Also I’m not sure the Cubs have had a better option at leadoff.
Thngs of worth are worth fighting for regardless of the odds.
by puckishcubsfan on Oct 6, 2008 8:12 PM CDT up reply actions
He is the cubs best offensive player
There’s no doubt in my mind. But people don’t like him because he’s a showboat, doesn’t hustle, and plays a horrible left field. He also doesn’t try to get better at the aspects of the game that he’s bad at. But if he’s producing, I don’t care what else he does.
"Check the magic of a winning season and there are always reasons beyond the talent." Ned Colleti
The lack of hustle
The lack of hustle is a lie. The only time he has not hustled was one time he thought it was a homerun and during the last part of 07 when he was playing on one leg.
Thngs of worth are worth fighting for regardless of the odds.
by puckishcubsfan on Oct 6, 2008 8:13 PM CDT up reply actions
You can't be serious...
…he has a terrible habit of being one of the slowest hitters out of the box I have ever seen (because he watches everything for a couple seconds) and that has cost him doubles that turned into singles.
Also, he lolligags in the OF all the time and just doesn’t go hard after the ball.
To say he doesn’t hustle all the time is by no means a lie.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
I agree
when was the last time you saw him dive for a ball? Or actually huff and puff for an out? It’s like his legs are made out of glass, ready to break if he moves too fast.
Diving for a ball isnt a measuring stick for defensive ability...
Felix Pie doesnt dive for balls (or I cant remember a dive) and he had amazing defense while with the Cubs.
Jim Edmonds dove for tons of stuff, and despite the fact that I’m a Edmonds fan (while he was with the Cubs, obviously) I thought he dove a few times more than needed.
The best outfielders, defensively, tend to get to the ball without needing to dive. Andrew Jones (while with the Braves) comes to mind.
Soriano is probably average with his routs, below average on his ability to catch a ball he gets to, and well above average with his arm. The only guys I’ve seen with better arms (that come to my now) were Jose Guillen (early in his career) and Vlad (with the Expos).
One thing you learned as a Cubs fan: when you bought you ticket, you could bank on seeing the bottom of the ninth.
Joe Garagiola
by Ryan at Cubshub on Oct 6, 2008 10:27 PM CDT up reply actions
i can remember
at least 5 spectacular diving catches jones made with the braves (usually while charging in)
Sometimes diving is the only way to get to a ball, but is should
be the exception not the rule. Diving for balls is the most misunderstood act in baseball. Good outfielders using positioning and a good jump to get to the ball. Speed also helps. Guys like Lenny Dykstra were thought to be hustlers, but the fact is he good bad jumps and dove at balls he had no chance to get.
Diving for balls is also a way to get hurt. Edmonds probably cost himself 10-15% of available playing time by abusing his body diving after balls and running into walls. Many people claim that Dimaggio never dove for a ball and he was considered one of the best outfielders of his time. He also didn’t have great speed.
Diving for balls looks impressive but looks can be deceiving. The balls Andruuw Jones dove after were just behind second base. A normal outfielder never gets close to those balls, whether he dives, leaps or sprouts wings.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Oct 7, 2008 9:08 AM CDT up reply actions
I can't believe you guys.
I used to frequent this place, alot, along time ago. Occasionally I peak in to see what’s become of the place. I don’t like what I see. People here seriously blame Soriano? Are you folks kidding me? What does he need to do to prove himself? Become short white, scrappy and have a neato nickname like “The Riot”? The group think over here sickens me. Where are the original thinkers, the critical thinkers? Few and far between anymore, I fear. This team collectively soiled the bed. Everyone including fan fave Theriot. But let’s pick out Soriano, Ramirez, or any other guy who isn’t a fan friendly fella.
Where is the bile for Theriot’s play, or Soto, or lackluster pitching? How about a little fair criticism? I’m sure I’ll get flamed for this, I half expect KOW to jump all over me for being “nasty”. I don’t care. It needed to be said.
Al, are you really proud of what has transpired here? The level of intelligent discourse has dropped significantly over the past year. Any dissenting voice is shouted down and berated, if not ultimately banned outright, shame on you, shame on well most of you.
"It's cool we like the same junk and stuff."- Philip J. Fry
I too can't believe you..
"Become short white, scrappy and have a neato nickname like "The Riot"? "
Why are you bringing race into the discussion? It is disgusting. Has anyone talked about race or any other irrelevant crap in their comments above? You don’t need to agree with what people have to say and this is completely fair. Just like everyone else you have an opinion and you can present that without brining irrelevant issues to the middle.
Also I haven’t seen anyone say that TheRiot is better than Soriano. So your asinine comments are preposterous and misdirected.
I don’t know about others but I said many times that TheRiot is not a Major League SS. But what is the alternative? Would you rather see Cedeno there? We should get a REAL ML SS this offseason preferably someone who can play lead off kind of like Furcal.
Soriano’s salary is a huge percentage of our payroll with the NTC and what not and that’s what drives people to talk about him. His contract is huge and whenever you get paid a lot people expect you to produce and this is natural in every walk of life. If I command a six figure salary at my work then I better know what I am doing and better fix any production down situations. Now I understand that every single ML player’s contract is overvalued and is not a true reflection of his talent levels but we are talking about percentages here. Why do you think ARod gets a ton of crap from the NY fans and media year in and year out?
So for brining irrelevant issues into this discussion, Sir, Shame on you.
I think his point was...
…“What does he need to do, become Theriot?”
I highly doubt he meant it as any type of racial thing. I think he was referring to the cult status of Ryan Theriot, not that fans would prefer a white outfielder to a minority outfielder.
One thing you learned as a Cubs fan: when you bought you ticket, you could bank on seeing the bottom of the ninth.
Joe Garagiola
by Ryan at Cubshub on Oct 6, 2008 10:30 PM CDT up reply actions
No I get his point
He mentioned “white”, that is a race, and he brought it into a conversation that had nothing to do with race. Soriano has been awful, horrible, dreadful in the postseason. The Cubs pay him to jack homers, rap doubles, score runs and steal a base once in awhile when his legs aren’t bothering him( for half the season) The Cubs pay that scrappy dude, Theriot, to hit for average, steal a base, ( hopefully better than a 50% ratio) score runs and not hurt then in the field. Theriot has come close to his performance level in the playoffs, Soriano is not even close to his.
Hey I am a defender of Soriano, but lets face it, he has not shown up for the last two playoff series.
Lou should move him into the 5/6 hole, and say " this is it Sori take it or tough shit".
"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"
smwojoz
Perhaps, when you peek in from time to time, you should peek into more threads before making such ridiculous accusations. There are a large number of people that have pointed out in other threads that they think theriot is the weak link on this team.
Soriano, if he were white and scrappy, would be subject to the same ire that you see in this thread. Having and nine digit contract and playing poorly tend to leave the fanbase less than amused.
Ah, the disgruntled former poster...
…stopping by to slap us all on the wrist for our poor baseball analysis skills and remind Al of how far his once mighty blog has fallen. Thank you for gracing us all with your presence and throwing us a few alms of your brillance, kind sir. I’m glad someone has the courage to reveal that the Cubs “collectively soiled the bed.” We had no idea! Now it all makes sense! Please come back and slum it with the unwashed masses more often, smwojoz.
So this is how it ends.
LOL!
The prodigal poster returns like a bad burrito!
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Oct 7, 2008 12:03 PM CDT up reply actions
Move him in the order, not to another team
Thats always been my position….hes a dynamic player, but a liability come playoff time b/c of his wild ways.
Okay, just so I understand it... in your wildest fantasy, you are in hell. And you are co-running a bed and breakfast with the devil.
Must
Must not be a big fan if them using their best option at leadoff would make you quit.
Thngs of worth are worth fighting for regardless of the odds.
by puckishcubsfan on Oct 6, 2008 8:14 PM CDT up reply actions
If he is there best leadoff option next year...
…Hendry will have failed to recognize what this club needs more than anything.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
Soriano was...
…the leadoff hitter that helped lead the Cubs to the best record in the NL…
I think he’s ok at leadoff.
One thing you learned as a Cubs fan: when you bought you ticket, you could bank on seeing the bottom of the ninth.
Joe Garagiola
by Ryan at Cubshub on Oct 6, 2008 10:33 PM CDT up reply actions
True...
…the had the best NL record in the regular season, but it still doesn’t mean it is the right thing to do to put the team in the best position to win, especailly against the best pitchers.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
agree
We have found out that the postseason is where we are at right now with this team. Regular season is one thing and the playoffs another. I am for a trade with this team, Hell Lee for Roberts, Ramy and a arm for David Wright, I think you have to shake the base of this team. Now, if they stand pat and tinker, I will give it one more year, however I think the Cubs are caught in a tough position, considering there failures the last two years.
"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"
Viva Viagra!
"I'm not much of a chemistry guy, you know. Chemistry to me is a pinch-hit double with the bases loaded"--Jim Frey, Chicago Tribune, 1985.
See ya, Reed's!
Take your fair-weather crap somewhere else then!
His user name is now...
…Evan’s Longoria. Doesn’t have quite the same ring to it.
So this is how it ends.
Does anyone
really think that he lost his leverage? I sort of thought that with this debacle, Lou is going to take charge and say “This is my barbecue. You’ll do as I say”. I honestly think he won’t lead off next year.
Its funny, you spend most of your life gripping a baseball. And in the end, its almost always the other way around.
He's most efficient there, in my opinion.
Especially when the 7, 8, or 9 hitters get on base, and he’s batting with some men on base. That’s what makes him good in that 1-hole, I believe.
There's nothing "bad" about Soriano.
He’s a player with limitations, such that he falls below the level that most would call “Great”. It would be wonderful if he became a great player by becoming a disciplined hitter. Absent that, he’s pretty much the player the Cubs’ signed. I don’t think any player is untouchable but I wouldn’t advocate shopping him unless you were getting a great deal because it’s a lot of production to lose, but in reality I don’t think many teams want that contract given the length.
Maybe next year we will tweak our lineup some and bat Soriano somewhere in the 3-5 spots, but even this tweak isn’t going to get us to the WS.
Okay, here’s some 2009 Cubs kool aid, picture a Pie with an OBP around .365 and a Fukudome with an OBP around .390, each batting ahead of Soriano, with Lee dropped to 5. It’s a better lineup primarily because of the addition of the other 2 productive players.
On your middle paragragh above...
…whether they would get to the world series would at least partly depend on who they got to be the leadoff hitter, don’t ya think?
I am of the opinion that a top shelf leadoff man makes this offense much better, and adding a power left handed stick would make it exceptional.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
I am torn about this because when i read stuff about batting order, the order doesn't seem to matter a whole lot.
But watching Soriano feast or famine there, I’d prefer that we have a better leadoff hitter in terms of OBP. I think this would help us move towards the world series and I also think the LHB with power would, too. Ideally I’d like to see either Pie or Fukudome be the outstanding leadoff guy. Maybe we look to picking up a LHB with some pop at 1B if there were interest in moving Lee? Or it could be at another spot.
In any event, Soriano’s a good player, I think in the wrong spot, things can be improved upon.
Case in point: The LA Angels.
The lack of left handed power probably cost them the playoffs. And they left a ton of runners stranded during the regular season, just like the Cubs.
by Fraggin Judge on Oct 7, 2008 7:28 AM CDT up reply actions
A player with limitations?
understatement of the year. Yeah, the limitation is that he can’t hit good pitching to save his life. He’s a mistake hitter, plain and simple, and there’s no reason why anyone with good command should let Soriano hurt them. Throw him the off speed crap in the dirt, and he’ll swing at it, again and again and again. Against 1,2, and 3 starters in the playoffs, Soriano always has been and always will be exposed for what he is: the biggest 136 million dollar sham in history.
Sorry for the rant- but I just can’t take anymore of his unreliability. Stats are not the whole story- oh sure, gaudy numbers at year’s end, but completely unpredictable and unreliable come crunch time. He can’t hit anywhere in the top 4 spots in the lineup as he can’t move a runner over, can’t hit a sac fly, and can’t be counted on with men on base. Unless he’s on one of his summer hot streaks, beating up bad pitching, he’s nothing. If they make the playoffs next year, I would expect nothing but more of the last two years from Soriano.
+1,000
Absolutely correct assessment of Soriano as a hitter. If you watch him all season it is painfully obvious.
by Carolina Cubbie on Oct 6, 2008 8:57 PM CDT up reply actions
The team might be able to get him going by batting him lower.
It does suck seeing out after out after out…
"but completely unpredictable and unreliable"
That is the accurate and true assessment of Soriano. Now you cannot have the above in your Resume and want to hit infront of the 3, 4 and 5 hitters.
Correct...
…you have to rate your hitters in this way:
Ask yourself the following questions:
If you are down by a run in the bottom of the 9th, who would you want leading off for you in that inning that you have confidence could get on and steal you a base? There is your best leadoff hitter.
If you are down by a run in the bottom of the ninth and have a man on 2nd with 2 outs, who do you want up to drive that run in? In most cases, this is your best average hitter? It also could be your best hitter who happens to have power as well – see Albert Puhols
down by two runs in the bottom of the ninth with 2 outs and a man on base, who would you want up to launch one to tie the game? Here is your best power hitter.
If you don’t have an obvious answer for all three, your lineup is missing something.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
Really?
I fail to see the need to typecast hitters like that. I think you get much better production by finding eight guys that can hit the ball and then figuring out some sort of a sensible order for them. Worrying about who hits where or what sort of hitter is better suited for what role puts the cart before the horse, misses the forest for the trees.
Why? Because baseball isn’t basketball, where you find your best perimeter scorer or your best in-the-paint scorer and get him the ball in that situation. The lineup constantly rolls over, so everybody bats in every kind of situation. The order matters far less than the people in it, plain and simple.
I was simplifying...
…what I was saying to make a point, not to say you use this primitive test to make out your batting order.
Your right that all hitters hit in certain situations, but it is also true they ALWAYS hit in front or behind the same guys, so it would be nice to try and blend them well together.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
The problem is that you're not trying to assemble a group of hitters...
…so much as you’re trying to assemble a baseball team, out of players who must play both offense and defense. And you have to account for things like contracts, sunk costs, incumbents… in an ideal world, I guess you could say that you want to have a bona fide leadoff man, a bona fide number three hitter, etc…. but really? In an ideal world you want eight guys who hit like Barry Bonds, and I do not mean the skinny mustached guy who played for the Pirates. But if you have eight guys who have an .609 OBP and a .812 SLG, you can guarantee run scoring, regardless of whether or not any of them can steal a base.
That’s the extreme, sure. But nothing frustrates me more than one-dimensional thinking – you have to score runs a certain way, you have to fill certain roles in a lineup, etc. There’s more than one way to skin a cat, and there’s a $115 million dollar realtiy of our contract commitments that dictate that we’re going to have certain players at certain positions come hell or high water next year. I’d rather work around those players than try to fill a percieved need and figure out how to fit him in with those players later.
The Cubs have really two areas where they could significantly upgrade next year – CF/RF and SS. I’d rather try to find the best available options there and try to fit them into a lineup than to try and find the best “leadoff hitter” and then try to find spots on the diamond for everybody. That’s how you end up with things like trying to make Hoffpauir into a right fielder. It isn’t pretty.
Respectfully Disagree
You ALWAYS have your best non-power OBP guys before the middle of the lineup, regardless of how it rolls over.
Never, but NEVER, put ketchup on a hot dog.
Just because something doesn't matter a whole lot...
…is no reason to do the wrong thing, of course. There obviously are better and worse ways to construct a lineup – it’s just far less important than finding the right players to be in that lineup.
The epitome of a streaky ball player
If he’s hot, look out. If he’s cold, he’s useless. Combine that with his defensive play, not the guy you want to make the keystone of your ballclub.
This is what I dislike about Lou...
In order to be truly be a successful Post-Season manager, imo, a manager has to be ready to make unpopular decisions to “veterans” for the benefit of the team. I do not believe at 64 or 65, Lou is ready to do this anymore.
NO F’CKING WAY should Dome have started except against his old countryman, Kuroda.
And, knowing Soriano’s horrendous Post-Season BA/OPS/OBP, you move his lame-ass DOWN – not keep him where he HURTS THE TEAM where there is no tomorrow.
Sorry Lou – in the Post Season, LaRussa, and Torre kick your ass.
Get some stones next year, Uncle Lou.
"you move his lame-ass DOWN "
I don’t think Lou or anyone would move their season long lead off hitter out of that spot just for the post season. If you want someone else in the lead off spot you slot him in there at a much earlier date.
I agree that Fukudome shouldn’t have been in the lineup for the first two games. But for all we know DeRo might be hurt more than the cubs have let us know.
I don’t think Lou or anyone would move their season long lead off hitter ...
Well, I will agree to disagree – this is exactly my point. It would have been the right move for the team. Reed Johnson (no relation to the above) should have been our #1 hitter.
It would have been unpopular, but Lou fed the monster all year.
In the Playoffs, as is stated above, you are facing the best pitchers, not hacks.
Soriano is a tool
Soriano should never be a leadoff hitter. He has zero patience and is better suited to hit lower in the order. He can not be traded because he is still owed $106 millon till 2014! This has to be the worst Jim Hendry singing in his tenure as GM. Soriano is no better than Sosa was before he got hot late in his career. Both are free swingers and are not team players.
"Man, this is fun!" - Len Kasper
Team players suck.
You show me a lineup of eight team players and I’ll show you a lineup of eight guys that don’t have the god-given talent to play baseball without kissing somebody’s ass.
Ridiculous. Absolutely ridiculous. Okay, sure, there are holes in Soriano’s game, but they’re the sort of holes that keep a guy from being Albert Pujols, and only one or two guys in a generation are that kind of a hitter.
If the worse comparison you can come up with for a guy is Sammy Sosa – if you think it’s an insult to be compared to one of the top power hitters of our lifetimes, leaving aside the moral concerns, you’re out of your bleeping mind.
We quickly forget how
excited many of us were when he was signed. At the time, THE coveted free agent in all of MLB.
I personally never thought the Cubs would spend like that.
Only now (or last year in the playoffs) do we see how overvalued the signing was.
Sosa finally learned how to be more patient
He quit swinging at most of the sliders and and breaking balls down and away. I was and still am a huge fan of Slammin’ Sammy. I wish him all the best in 5 years. Soriano if he could quit being a massively overpaid prima donna whine ass and simply get put down lower in the order where a POWER HITTER belongs, he should start seeing better pitches to hit thus, maybe earning some of those millions he is robbing the Cubs and us fans of.
"Man, this is fun!" - Len Kasper
by ryno HOF 2005 on Oct 6, 2008 9:46 PM CDT up reply actions
IMO...
…Sammy’s period of relative patience at the plate happened to jive with his increase in body mass. That increase in mass made him stronger and quicker with the bat and when you are quicker with the bat, you can wait that split second longer to recognize that breaking ball is going in the dirt and layoff. To me, this is the most import advantage supplements give a hitter and why they can wait on their pitch better and launch it.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
Soriano was juiced for the better part of a decade..
And like Soriano, Sam-ME Sosa was a me-first player who relished the one man carnival act he created.
"What pressure should I have on me? There's no pressure on me." -- Lou Piniella (10/3/08)
What? now you are saying Soriano was juiced?
Tell me that is a typo and not just hate talking.
But the wind blew me back via Chicago, In the middle of the night
Juiced? Soriano? Come on, BlueMike, try again. Soriano's HR/AB is
higher now than at any point in his career. If he ever juiced, it would be now. That makes a lot of sense. He juicing now when testing is stronger than it ever has been. When overall HR production is at it’s lowest in about 20 years. Give me a break.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Oct 7, 2008 12:16 PM CDT up reply actions
My mistake
No, I was not saying Alfonso Soriano was juiced. I firmly believe he is and always has been a clean player.
Sammy Sosa on the other hand was juiced for a decade no matter what the narrow band of investigation in the Mitchell Report has to say.
"What pressure should I have on me? There's no pressure on me." -- Lou Piniella (10/3/08)
Yep
In addition to the steroids Sammy Sosa will go down in history as one of the most overrated players to ever grace the game. There is no way he should ever be considered Hall of Fame material. The guy was a master of injection and in self-publicity that found perfect fit for his act with the Luvable Loser culture of the Cubs.
"What pressure should I have on me? There's no pressure on me." -- Lou Piniella (10/3/08)
Look, Sosa and Soriano are great complimentary pieces
but I wouldn’t try building an offense around them. ARam or Lee in his prime, yes.
Never, but NEVER, put ketchup on a hot dog.
You're Being A Little Disingenuous, Colin
Tony Gwynn, Ryne Sandberg, Cal Ripken, and Billy Williams most certainly did not suck.
Never, but NEVER, put ketchup on a hot dog.
Watching the Red Sox now
wow – what a difference in the two teams and organizations…
Was just thinking the same thing
They play with so much confidence. You just feel like they are always going to win.
"Cub fans like to think of things in catastrophic terms." - Crane Kenney
I think that every other team in the play offs are like that, the Cubs had it in the regular season but I never saw it in the post.. its a shame
"You must try to generate happiness within yourself. If you aren't happy in one place, chances are you won't be happy anyplace."
Nope. Sorry...
“every other team…” is not the Red Sox, or their organization.
Soriano is an over-sensitive hacking stats whore who I detest
Hendry went out in the market and outbid himself for a player that no other high grade team in baseball wanted. We are stuck with the p.o.s. for the duration. Unfortunately our manager katows to Soriano and won’t stand up to his insistence of batting at the top of the order. So don’t expect much to change with Soriano in 2009. He’ll go on his patented hot streaks and his personal statistics will be nice and shiny all over again. And the debate will start all over again on why Soriano is a major strength of the Cubs while coming up with another basket full of excuses on why he can’t hit good pitching and vaporizes during crunch time.
Soriano is the type of player who should play on a dog team. A team where he can put up ungoldly personal numbers like he did with Washington in 2007 or in Texas the few years preceding. A team that has no chance of winning and where there is therefore no pressure on the p.o.s. A team where he doesn’t have to be a team player.
"What pressure should I have on me? There's no pressure on me." -- Lou Piniella (10/3/08)
+1,000,000
"Man, this is fun!" - Len Kasper
by ryno HOF 2005 on Oct 6, 2008 10:23 PM CDT up reply actions
LOL, classic BlueMike!
All hate, no hope. And I’m going to be guffawing over “katows” for some time.
Look, Soriano is a problem. I can’t disagree with that. But the Cubs have to figure out how to make him a manageable problem. I’m still thinking that, over the long course of the regular season, having him first isn’t that big of a deal. But, come playoff time, Lou needs to drop him – if only to take the team’s mindset off of “it all starts with Alfonso Soriano.”
So this is how it ends.
Soriano
He can help a team be better during the regular season, and will carry a team for a couple weeks during the year. But for a team that is good and trying to get over the hump to be world champions, he is USELESS. Good pitching beats soriano everytime…….3 breaking balls in the dirt low and outside and soriano’s ass is back on the bench. And moving him to the middle of the order doesn’t help at all either…..he’ll just kill scoring opportunities when people are on base.
Soriano was signed the same offseason that carlos lee was on the market……We should have gone after him.
"Soriano was signed the same offseason that carlos lee was on the market..."
you can be sure this was discussed internally.
Again, if you were visiting this board in December 2006, 99% of the posts were incredibly pumped that Hendry reeled in the the most coveted FA prize of that year. The general concensus was that CLEE was fat and would only get fatter and slower.
I´d say 99% is a bit much
A think more people were disgusted with the signing from the beginning. The length of the contract and the dollars per year were never in line with the kind of player that Soriano was or is ever going to be. The majority of people were happy because a) he become the most coveted FA (who knows how that works) and b) because they didn´t care about the money because it wasn´t " their" money.
The problem now is that the Cubs don´t have the flexibility to get a real top of the line player because of the money they have already commited. And for 8 years and 136 million dollars you should have definitely done better than Soriano, a lot better. Basically Hendry wanted to make a splash and Soriano was a pure “5 tool” Hendry type.
It was a pretty awful contract. In fact, it was fantastically awful when we thought it was for 6-7 years and 1-2 option years. When we realized it was 8 guaranteed years it just left you without words. As soon as it was signed you knew it would become an untradeable contract, and that is as tale tale sign as there is of a bad contract. Unless the Cubs eat a big portion of salary (at least 40% or so) they are not moving Soriano even if they wanted to.
If Soriano is untradeable, then the question is where can help the team the most.
I say, batting 5th. But then, the Cubs have to get a leadoff hitter who can play one of the positions on the field that are available.
by Fraggin Judge on Oct 7, 2008 7:36 AM CDT up reply actions
I believe he is tradeable without having to eat large amounts of salary.
Not tradeable for any real talent beyond the equilivant of 2008 Corey Patterson, but tradeable to move him. A team with money looking to generate offense would take him off the Cubs hands. Angels, Yankees, etc.
The Rockies were able to move Hampton. It’s just what you expect back.
But the wind blew me back via Chicago, In the middle of the night
Unless you swap bad contract for bad contract
i.e. Soriano for Zito.
Never, but NEVER, put ketchup on a hot dog.
Now that is just plain silly
Soriano for Zito would be stupid.
Thngs of worth are worth fighting for regardless of the odds.
by puckishcubsfan on Oct 7, 2008 2:14 PM CDT up reply actions
Carlos Lee
There is absolutely no reason to think the Cubs would be better with him than with Soriano.
Thngs of worth are worth fighting for regardless of the odds.
by puckishcubsfan on Oct 8, 2008 8:40 AM CDT up reply actions
Carlos Lee was never truly interested in the Cubs.
He wanted to play in Texas near his ranch.
So this is how it ends.
Soriano
Like most………………….I about jumped through the roof when I saw the ESPN “breaking news” about the Soriano signing. I certainly can’t criticize Hendry for signing him……however………looking back it was a bad signing. 6 more years at escalating $$$ is something that they will regret. I hope (although it’s unlikely) that they make every effort to unload him this offseason. Even if it costs a few million to do it. Soriano will kill the back end of a rotation along with the 3rd -7th relievers on most staffs. However, you don’t see those guys often in the postseason and he will always struggle in the playoffs. Most likely case is to get him into the 4 or 5 hole IMO if he can’t be gone.
Blue Mike………….you have nailed this situation on the head all year……….IMO……….this will go down as one the the biggest free agant blunders EVER!
Carl Pavano
Mike Hampton, Barry Zito, Juan Pierre, and Jason Giambi would like a word with you.
That said, I worry about this too. Strange, though, Soriano had his second highest OBP of his career this year.
...and points to how people get overly-seduced by his personal statistics
Soriano is what he is and he’s not about to start changing into his early to mid 30’s. He has been and will continue to be a horrific signing by the Cubs. He is greatest example in baseball how you simply can’t look at statistics in a vacuum to gauge the value of a ballplayer to a ballclub. Lots of people on this blog disagree with that view, but so be it.
"What pressure should I have on me? There's no pressure on me." -- Lou Piniella (10/3/08)
I thought it was a good signing too......
because all i knew about was the numbers the guy put up…..after watching him play over the last two years it is obvious that he feeds off of bad pitching and can’t lay off a breaking ball in the dirt 3 feet outside.
This is exactly why
This is exactly why GMs should never ever listen to the fans.
Yes Soriano horrible player. IMportant part of a team that is 41 over 500 over the last 2 seasons.
Not saying he’s a great player or worth the money but the idea we should trade him just to trade him is ridiculous.
And the idiotic he doesn’t care thing. Right he played on one leg down the stretch in 07 because he doesn’t care.
And we trade him just to get rid of him would cost us more because we’d have to eat his salary and pay whoever to replace him.
And it’s a lie he has refused to leave the leadoff slot. In 07 and 08 he has been our best option.
And yes we did play decently without him but we played much better with him in the lineup.
Thngs of worth are worth fighting for regardless of the odds.
Glad you cleared that up
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
Clear as mud.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Oct 7, 2008 2:48 PM CDT up reply actions
Is there some instance...
where a GM followed the fans’ advice? You’ve made that statement 37 times since the season ended.
Free Ronny Cedeno
If you actually read
If you actually read my posts you’d see my point is the fans are more reactionary and if a GM was ever as reactionary as the fans there would be 200 trades a season.
Thngs of worth are worth fighting for regardless of the odds.
by puckishcubsfan on Oct 8, 2008 8:39 AM CDT up reply actions
And
And a GM would not be enough of a moron to even think about trading him for Zito.
Thngs of worth are worth fighting for regardless of the odds.
by puckishcubsfan on Oct 8, 2008 8:41 AM CDT up reply actions

by 

















