Where do the Cubs go from here?
First of all, I want to say how much I enjoy reading the various thoughts on this board. Al does a hell of a job with this site and I have learned a lot listening to the various opinions from many of the regulars. In fact, in many ways, you learn more reading this site than you do the beat reporters covering the team (and certainly the columnists), because many of those guys are conerned about upsetting the front office or players they deal with on a day to day basis. Also, there is no question in my mind, that the media uses this board to learn about fan setiment and to gauge some of their discussion.
Both 07 and 08 brought both positive and negative events to the Cubs. The problem has been, the negative has reared it's ugly head when you would expect the club to be mentally focused, motivated and on top of their game. When you play like the Cubs did in two straight post-seasons, you have to really evaluate what is going wrong and what can be done to fix it.
A few of my thoughts:
Piniella - I have made my opinion of Piniella pretty clear on this board and I won't bore folks with why I think he has been very good with this club. With that said, I think the most important thing for Piniella, is to just be Lou Piniella and not worry about anything else. At times, I feel as though he has played politician, instead of doing what he felt was right. Lou has stated many times, the game has changed and it is important for the manager to change with it (I believe he refers to the big money contracts and player egos) you need to be cognizant of. At this point, Lou is probabaly going to manage for 2 more years and then he walks away and I want him to manage this time period 100% his way and not be concerned with egos.
Hendry - Jim is another guy who I have stated my opinion on this board for a long time. Hendry has some excellent strengths as a GM, but he also has his share of negatives. For the most part, Hendry is a "players GM", not unlike you would call Dusty Baker a "players manager". He goes out of his way to take care of players when they are traded, hands out no-trade clauses like they are candy and makes promises to players that he goes out of his way to keep. This has helped him to sign guys ahead of other teams, because players talk to each other and they let others know that Hendry "will take care of you". Clearly, this can help you out in getting players you need (as long as you pick the right ones), but it can also bite you on the backend. There are times when you find out you need to change the makeup of your club (this offseason is an expample of that) and when you have the bulk of your big salary guys on no-trades, it really makes it difficult to move players for other parts that may be a better fit. Also, Hendry has never been a guy who is willing to trade players at the peak of their value, to get another guy who may be more of a need. This is something I really think he needs to change if the opportunity is there. If the Cubs want to trade any of these guys, that player can go to them as say - no, I won't accept a trade or you can trade me to any team except the 25 I have on this list (and that is usually what happens). Clearly, this limits your ability to shop talent from other clubs and make a deal that can help you. I don't know how much longer Hendry will be GM with the Cubs, but I can imagine the new owners doing their due dilligence on the Cubs payroll and not being pleased with all the backloaded deals and no-trades that can stick you with players you may not want.
The Lineup: Overall, they produced a lot of runs during the regular season, so their has to be some positive points about the makeup of the talent. IMO, the positive is the depth and the club got good returns from the lower part of the order which helped to seperate them from other clubs. Also, the club had a lot of games where they scored 10+ runs and also quite a few where they scored 3 or less. There is an element of inconsistancy that has to be addressed and this issue is always magnified in the post-season.
I am done with Soriano at leadoff, and I sure as hell hope the brain trust feels the same way. It's true that the club went well when Soriano was hot, and that is why you had so many 10+ run games and others where the offense looked completely different. For once and for the first time since 03, they have to have a leadoff hitter who is an excellent OBP guy and can steal you a base at key times to manufacture runs. During the playoffs, when your 2-3-4 hitters watch their leadoff guy look feeble at the plate, it causes them to try and do too much and we have seen this 2 straight years and some during the regular season.
Regarding the other guys in the lineup; Lee is a good hitter who can be valuable to the team, but he is longer a "feature" type guy that can hit 3rd on a championship club. In fact, they really don't have this player on the roster and who knows whether they will be able to acquire one. If they can't, just bringing in a solid leadoff guy will make a world of difference.
Position players: CF, RF and SS are the positions that should be addressed in the offseason. Will Pie be a guy they can rely on? I don't know the answer to that question, but I have serious doubts. Will Fukudome make adjustments? I think his work ethic and pride will allow him to, but that certainly is not a given. At least with Fukudome, his OBP was .350+, he plays stellar defense and knows how to run the bases. If you have to live with him in the lineup (because of his contract), he won't kill you as long as your lineup is solid and he hits 8th. I would love to upgrade SS, but it will depend on how much leeway Hendry has to sign guys and the no-trades are going to make that avenue difficult. Time will tell how the powers at be feel about giving Hendry more money.
Pitching staff: Overall, I was very pleased with the staff, especially the emergence of Dempster as a very good starter. I predicted him to fail as a starter and he proved my completely wrong. The bad news is, he did exactly what I thought he would do in the post-season game, that I thought he would do in the regular season. Was it a fluke, was he just to jazzed up pitching his first post-season game? I hope that is what it was and I am willing to chalk it up to that. I have seen the discussion about his BAIBP, and there could be something to that, but I also know he has very good stuff and that is why he is very good when he pounds the strike zone. I sign him if possible and again, this will depend on what he wants and what kind of money Hendry has to toss around. Lilly is going to be what he is - a reliable starter. Zambrano needs to be dealt with a little tougher by Lou and Larry, and let him know enouph of this childish bullshit. Harden is another story, he has dominant stuff, but I see him as another Mark Prior. You can't pick up the option and deal with that kind of crap again. I would like to see another lefty in the rotation and I would like to see Marshall get first crack at it. They need to resign Wood and add someone (could be in house) to replace Howry and they should be ok in the pen.
Not unlike last year, except to a higher level, this offseason has a lot of questions. The most important one will be how much leaway Hendry has to spend and can or will he trade any players to get pieces that fit better?
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
2 recs |
98 comments
Comments
Key reaction...
Cubs were blessed with relative good health and a big slew of players who had solid 2008 campaigns that, collectively speaking, will be very difficult to replicate in 2009. The only player in the everyday lineup who you would think will produce better personal statistics is Alfonso Soriano given all the time he missed in 2008. But beyond that? Some examples…
1. Dempster and Lilly performed exceptionally for who they are which is quality major league starting pitchers. I dont’ see either matching his 2008 performance in 2009. If it were me I would let Dempster leave via free agency because handing him a 4 year contract at $50 million plus is a risk I am not willing to take.
2. Edmonds and Johnson chipped in with over 20 HRs and nearly 100 RBIs in CF. That is extremely doubtful to be replicated in 2009 by the combination of them or the dubious Felix Pie.
3. Lee has become an old man at 1st base. Going forward he is doubtful to do better than 20 HRs and 90 RBIs. In fact further decline is likely.
4. Theriot and Fontenot played out of their skin in 2008. I like both players, but let’s face it each of these guys is classic overachiever with meaningful limitation to their game.
5. Marmol chalked in with nearly 80 mostly great relief appearances. Is he going to replicate that heavy workload? The odds say no. In fact the odds say he will go backwards a bit and may succumb to arm woes.
6. Wood stayed largely healthy and effective. We all know his arm hangs on with baling wire and duct tape. If I am a betting man then I don’t like the prospects of him replicating that sort of performance two years in a row. And God forbid if Hendry signs him to a multi-year deal.
"What pressure should I have on me? There's no pressure on me." -- Lou Piniella (10/3/08)
by MDBNIU on Oct 7, 2008 10:30 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
A fairly sober reaction here.
1) You’re right on both accounts, but with Lilly lightning has already struck twice in the same place now. I never expected Lilly to do what he did in 2007, let alone come close to matching it in 2008. It may be that the Cubs and Lilly are the match that has unlocked his potential. I’m not counting on it, but I’m not betting against it either.
2) I think Johnson can do in 2009 what he did in 2008. I think Edmonds would be a big disappointment if we re-signed him. I think Dome-Johnson or Dome-Pie may be the CF of 2009.
3) See comments below.
4) Fontenot almost certainly just had his career year. I’d be willing, though, to set up Fontenot-Theriot as a platoon at 2B in 2009 and see what they produce, pushing each other for more playing time. 2B’s not hard to fill if they both flop at the trade deadline.
5) Marmol should not be counted on for 2009. Hopefully conservative use of him, however, can have him fresh for 2009’s October.
6) I’m actually a little optimistic on Wood, but that may be entirely fanboy homerism.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Oct 7, 2008 10:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have faith in Lilly at this point
His numbers in 2008 were actually worse than his numbers in 2007, except for wins. I think Lilly will be able to duplicate his numbers from this year, if not better them. He did have 10 more strikeouts this year as well.
2007 – 15-8 (34 starts), 207 innings, 3.83 era, 122 ERA+
2008 – 17-9 (34 starts), 204.7 innings, 4.09 ERA, 110 ERA+.
I really can’t make up my mind about Dempster. He pitched really well this year, but all indication point to his being extremely lucky, BABIP-wise. He is a good personality to have around the team, and I think he would really be missed. Does one year + personality justify $48 million over 4 years, I just don’t know.
When you're eight games behind, it's like eight miles; when you're eight games in front, it's like eight inches. ~ Ron Santo
by gwood on Oct 7, 2008 10:51 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lilly...
…is the man. Look at his numbers while he was with the Jays, then look at the offensive output the Yanks and Red Sox put up over that same period. He put up respectable numbers in that lethal division and hasn’t slowed down since coming over here.
Besides the obvious - Go Irish.
Z. He doesn't need an exclamation point. He is one.
by PopeFlick on Oct 7, 2008 11:23 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Some significant changes needed
Hendry has invested money into three players who are not true #1 champion stars….Zambrano, Ramirez and Soriano. The rest is on the margins.
Zambrano is a good #2, like Darling was to Gooden, or Dyrsdale was to Koofax, Hands was to Jenkins, but he is not the biggest horse…no matter what Piniella says. That does not mean trade him it means add to him. Get a true #1 and he is now a FA from Milwaukee who likes to hit HR’s.
Ramirez when he came was a great #6 hitter…..but not the cornerstone of the offense, he is the compliment to a true Clean up hitter. But he is still valuable to trade (and send a message to the club that it means business to produce) the question is for whom.
You can go older and trade 3B for 3B as the Yankees will undoubtedly retool….and bring AROD here but the Cubs would have to overpay and probably could spend other places. The thing is the Cubs need a real cleanup hitter, a 35+ HR thumper. It could be Dunn but i think it is Holiday, still young, and a powerful hitter who could hit real well in Wrigley. But he (like Dunn) plays LF….
Back to Soriano….who would want him? Boston? Seattle? Mets? Philly? Someone would want him for the right price. I think the winning trade is Soriano for Ichiro….replace lead off for lead off and $80 M for $102M where the Cubs could trade Pie and possibly another throw in like Ceda for the best pure hitter in the game. Plus Ichiro can join his Japanese mate in Fukudome and the two of them be buddies.
Then you would move DeRosa to 3B, Fontenot to 2B and have a lineup like:
Ichiro, Theriot/Fontenot, Lee, Holiday, Soto, Fukudome, DeRosa, Fontenot/Theriot….more lefty/righty balance…..in fact if fukudome gets well he can slip back to the 5th spot and Soto goes to the 6th spot followed by Fonty and and DeRosa.
Piniella: "This is a tougher job than I thought it would be, I'm going to be honest with you."
by Ivy Walls on Oct 7, 2008 6:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I actually agree on some of your points
Lee will continue to regress, but should still be a solid #5-6 hitter, and continue to play solid defense. Theriot needs to go to the bench where he’s best suited. I worry about Mamol and Wood’s health, but neither of them are going anywhere so there’s little that can be done about that.
That said, I have a little more faith in Fontenot and a lot more in Pie than you do. We’ll see on both of those.
However you are flat out wrong on Lilly. You keep harping this point that he had some sort of career year this year and it just doesn’t mesh with the numbers. Going by ERA+, this is actually the 5th best season of his career. His ERA+ of 110 this season isn’t very far from his career average of 104 (and was a little worse than his first year as a Cub, where he had an ERA+ of 122).
So it’s extremely reasonable to expect continued success at this level from him.
by Wreckard on Oct 7, 2008 10:55 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ted Lilly
I didn’t say Ted Lilly had a career year. Rather what I tried to express is that Ted Lilly will be hard pressed to replicate the type of performance he had in 2008. That doesnt’ mean he is going to fall off the earth. I like Lilly a great deal. Fact is he has been a godsend. But do I think he gets to 17 wins with that ERA and innings pitched total again? No.
"What pressure should I have on me? There's no pressure on me." -- Lou Piniella (10/3/08)
by MDBNIU on Oct 7, 2008 11:08 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why wouldn't he?
Wins are a dumb stat to look at, so I won’t quibble over that. But in terms of performance, this season was well within his career norms, in fact it was right around the median for his career. So… why exactly wouldn’t you expect that again? Gut feeling?
by Wreckard on Oct 7, 2008 11:11 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
A lot of meat here to discuss
“Where do the Cubs go from here?” is the question we’ll be asking up through Thanksgiving and start to see some answers for once the post-season is over. It’s the question Jim, Lou, and the other Cub leaders are sitting down and asking now.
In the upcoming days/weeks, I was hoping to make some posts dividing the question up by position – what are our options at corner IF, middle IF, OF, SP, and RP both taking a look at what is available and at what we already have in-house. What you’ve done already is ask the big picture question – the question, in fact, you’ve argued Jim Hendry hasn’t been asking (or answering) well enough.
Is there something beyond individual players that the Cubs need? Even if “leadership” is something that the Cubs or we decide they need, I don’t know that, as fans, we’re really in a good position to observe or critique it among players.
So, let’s look at the lead-off man situation
In house, the Cubs have Ryan Theriot, Kosuke Fukudome, and Derrek Lee who combine speed with on-base ability. Theriot’s 2008 is suspect going forward when compared to his career numbers. The low-SLG also warns of a Juan Pierre effect potential where teams refuse to walk him because they know that if he puts it in play, it will only be a single. Dome and Lee are marginal in terms of speed. And both had horrid season splits that suggest they’re either going to readjust and be much better hitters, or not at all qualified to lead off. Could Lee be trained all off-season to redevelop his base-stealing skills and start to hit the ball the other way,to focus on remaking himself as a hitter? I think it’s possible.
On the free-agent scene, there’s Rafael Furcal – an obvious fit, but also a player who has spurned Hendry in the past and has spoken positively about re-signing with the Dodgers. Furcal’s OBP has rarely been great, either, and may give us no more OBP at lead-off than Soriano. On the other hand, if Gerald Perry could do for Furcal what he’s done for Aramis and others with the Cubs… In the end, before I get my hopes up for Furcal, I want to see him available and courted by the Cubs.
Then there’s Bobby Abreu, again, not a traditional lead-off man, but he gets on base and steals. On the negative side, he’s talked about sticking with the Yankees, his defense is poor, and he’s 35. If Abreu slips out of the Yankees’ grasp, I do think we should be talking about him, even if not as a lead-off hitter.
The trade market hasn’t developed yet, but Brian Roberts may be there. But I think the thing to recognize is how hard it is to get a lead-off hitter who combines both SBs and OBP. There were, what a dozen guys this season with more than 30 SBs, and of those guys, they’re either Taveras/Bourn types who don’t get on base, or they’re premiere guys like Rollins and Reyes who aren’t getting traded.
All this is to say that there are not many options for lead-off better than Soriano. Roberts – yes, but then what do we do with Theriot-Fontenot-DeRosa? Furcal, maybe, but is he even available? Then, we have to start looking less traditional – Dome, Lee, Abreu, maybe Fontenot and give up speed altogether.
Anyway, these are some of my thoughts.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Oct 7, 2008 10:34 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Stolen bases...
are a casualty of the Moneyball era. Beane and his disciples realized that it is better to have .OBP guys who are SMART runners. That is, they go when they can and have a high percentage. Or they are good at going from 1st to 3rd.
Both Lee and Fukudome are smart players.
The worst beer I had was pretty good.
by Worf on Oct 7, 2008 12:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Stolen bases are the casualty of the run enviornment, most likely a product of a juiced baseball.
The breakeven point of SB to CS is directly related to the offensive context. It’s not that people suddenly figured out that SBs were bad, it’s that their value changed as the run context changed. In the new humidor era the SB could regain a bit more value.
by cwyers on Oct 7, 2008 2:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
In terms of the leadoff situation...
Unfortunately, Alfonso Soriano is babied and coddled by this organization. Lou Piniella has shown zero inclination to take on Soriano or to take the step of moving him somewhere else in the lineup.
"What pressure should I have on me? There's no pressure on me." -- Lou Piniella (10/3/08)
by MDBNIU on Oct 7, 2008 10:44 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
In terms of the shortstop situation...
I dont’ see the Cubs mussing up the status quo of Ryan Theriot. We can argue with this strategy until the cows come home but my guess is the organization will say Theriot proved offensive ignitor, chipped in with .385 OBP, can run and is not yet arbitration eligible therefore meaning that he is cheap.
Rafael Furcal? I don’t see it happening. In fact I don’t see much of anything happening in free agency.
"What pressure should I have on me? There's no pressure on me." -- Lou Piniella (10/3/08)
by MDBNIU on Oct 7, 2008 10:47 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Theriot is only going to get better IMO
His base stealing percentage should rise and his fielding should get a little better… his range to his left is great.. but to his right is terrible and when he is going to his right.. his arm fails him. This should improve… this is the first time he has been an every day staple in the lineup and he led the team in OBP and was second in hits behind DLEE (who everybody loves to demonize these days). He will improve… that being said.. put him at 2nd unless you pick up brian roberts
WOW WHAT A SEASON!
by SouthsideCUBSfan on Oct 7, 2008 12:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Very few shortstops get better at defense as they get older, especially at Theriot's age.
Why should he be any different?
by cwyers on Oct 7, 2008 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like The Riot..
Theriot played a big role with this ’08 team. He was one of our best hitters. he could move runners at any time (since most of hits went to the right side) he runs very well. but his fielding ability is the only thing that needs work. so first off fielding work is a great thing to do in spring training. So i would keep SS the same and keep LBR he for the past two years now he has shown he can be very good. Although in 07 he went from awesome to ok but he is a kid that will always play 110%. So I would like to see more of a rotation will DeRo, theriot, and LBR. Not exactly a platoon but a rotation to who is playing well. Give DeRo a couple more starts at SS. Reed what a great job he did this year and also Jimmy. They both bring veteranship to this team and good defense. I would keep the platoon until Pie shows he deserves it. If Pie works out then they can ship Reed or Jimmy at the dealine. I would also like to see Reed play more RF I know he comfortable in CF but give him more time in RF and it will come. Dome we cant just give up on cause of his contract but he needs to have a short leash.
Sori needs to be moved from leadoff. Maybe theriot leadoff Sori 2 and DLee or Rami or DeRo 3rd. We do need another bat someone that can be a DeRo and play where ever.
Pitching
I think Marmol will have another great year as long as we keep him in just the setup man.
But we DEFINITELY have to do something about this mid relief. DUMP HOWRY!!!!! go get someone that can fill that gap maybe Gaudan is that man when healthy. We didnt get to see enough of him to tell but get another arm for the pen. The starting 5 can be very tricky. Big Z struck out less this year but he seemed like a better pitcher this year then any other. he controlled his emotions alot better. Harden will be good given limitations. Demp I think will regress alittle he will be a good 3 or 4 pitcher but not as good as he showed this year. I think it was alot with the excitement to be in front of Cub fans being the starting pitcher that made him so good. As for Marquis this is a tough call. Just as he pisses you off he shows you a flash of greatness and then pisses you off again. I dont know if we can dump him so he can be a good 5 starter as he showed this year.
by bizzle4 on Oct 7, 2008 12:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lou has feinted at moving Soriano a couple of times.
What, after all, was the big Brian Roberts hullabaloo all off-season last year, if not an excuse to move Soriano? Soriano was batting 2nd in spring training. In 2007, Lou batted Soriano 3rd 7 games and 5th 2 games. Soriano responded by not hitting anything. Has he been coddled? Sure, in a way. But I don’t think it’s anything more than what Lee and Ramirez and other All-Star players get.
I think Lou will move Soriano if he gets a premiere lead-off hitter. I think he won’t if we don’t.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Oct 7, 2008 10:51 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Considering Lou's history...
…and the fact he is reaching the end, I am banking him saying “enouph of this shit”.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
by MPH73 on Oct 7, 2008 11:08 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well there
is always a start. That needs to be addressed if the Cubs want a better lineup.
"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"
by Grockcubs on Oct 7, 2008 6:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Winter Wheeling and Dealing
Does anybody know if Hendry has any OK to go out and get anybody? I’m sure he’s got the money to resign a few guys, Demp and Wood in particular, but who all is on the free agent market would be a good fit with this team? I’m talking realistically because this team won’t go out and get any top A plus talent because Im sure they can’t afford it.
Plus, I really think Fukudome might have to earn his RF spot again next spring because I think Lou was really disappointed in him and just won’t reward him with RF unless he has no other choice. I think the RF position is going to be a hole for a few seasons because I don’t… nor did I ever, expect much from Fukudome besides decent OBP, and good defensive. Who knows though, maybe he’ll turn it around and will hit 330. I doubt it, but I would accept it! lol
by TheHawkRules on Oct 7, 2008 10:59 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Lots of big money backloaded contracts and no-trade clauses makes Hendry's work difficult in my view...
It’s time to pay the piper on some of these contracts Hendry handed out like candy the past 3 years. Case in point, Jason Marquis is due $9 million plus in the final year of his contract.
"What pressure should I have on me? There's no pressure on me." -- Lou Piniella (10/3/08)
by MDBNIU on Oct 7, 2008 11:11 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The money is there...
…I don’t think there is any question about that.
The question(s) are; will the sale situation limit his ability to spend? Will two straight playoff flops cause pause in giving Hendry considerably more dough to spend?
I would imagine, we will know the answers in the next 4-8 weeks.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
by MPH73 on Oct 7, 2008 11:12 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think the lightning in a bottle
Was really Dempster and not Lilly. While its true we have some holes that need to be filled. The Cubs for what its worth DO NOT have a guy that in crunch time scares the hell outta you.
An Albert Pujols or a Manny or a guy like that.
Soriano, Aramis, D-Lee are an excellent supporting cast guys, but do not strike fear in the pitchers heart like a Manny would.
So with that said.
I think the Cubs should move Fukudome to CF and Soriano to RF or back to 2B and try and get Manny for LF.
Before you start telling me how Soriano will suck in RF and all that stuff. Let me ask you a simple question.
What did DeRosa do in RF that makes you totally against this move in the first place?
The only way….THE ONLY WAY the Cubs make any post season progess is to get a Manny type player in the line up. A guy who can hit the cover off the ball just about any at bat and strike fear in the hearts of the pitcher.
by Galvan316 on Oct 7, 2008 11:17 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't know that I agree
Yes, the Dodgers have Manny and the Phils have Howard, but look at the AL teams in the ALCS. Neither has a Manny type guy in the middle of the order.
Yes the Red Sox have Ortiz, but he isn’t having a typical Ortiz type year. The Rays definitely do not have that one hitter who you cannot let beat you. Longoria may be turning into that, but he is not there now.
What we need is hitters that do not cave under the pressure. Guys that will go out there and play their game regardless of the situation. This is something that our guys did not do this postseason. We were uncharacteristically impatient, swinging at a lot of balls out of the strike zone. Having a “Manny-type” would be great, but it would have been better for our guys to play the game the way we know they are capable of playing. They didn’t do that.
When you're eight games behind, it's like eight miles; when you're eight games in front, it's like eight inches. ~ Ron Santo
by gwood on Oct 7, 2008 12:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Best Chance
In my opinion, the team that consistently gets you to the playoffs gives you the best chance to win the World Series. I don’t buy into the “built for a marathon not a sprint idea” afterall you can’t win the World Series if you dont make the playoffs.
That said, I’d keep this nucleus and add one B+/A bat or arm and then either resign or go out and get a solid reliever and sure up the bench with gamers who’ve won in October.
Guys I’d consider signing,
CC Sabathia (might as well pursue, although his contract will be huge and milwaukee wore him out)
Derek Lowe (you saw why)
Milton Bradley (if you’re going to give up on Fukudome, or move him to center)
Adam Dunn (same)
Roleplayers
Gabe Kapler (had an interesting year and knows how to win in october)
Craig Counsell (gamer)
Rocco Baldelli
Horacio Ramirez
Please sign Mark Prior to a tiny salary…It would be very low risk with a possible huge upside.
by northpaw22k on Oct 7, 2008 11:19 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
"Please sign Mark Prior to a tiny salary"
You are not serious right?
by cubsnlinux on Oct 7, 2008 11:33 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Only if...
…they make him carry that pink backpack to the pen.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
by MPH73 on Oct 7, 2008 11:36 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mark Prior will not be a Cub again under Hendry.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Oct 7, 2008 11:37 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I say this very rarely...
I am fucking done if Prior comes back.
The worst beer I had was pretty good.
by Worf on Oct 7, 2008 12:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He only comes back to Chicago
If needs to return some Towels…
"Aw, how could he (Jorge Orta) lose the ball in the sun, he's from Mexico." -- Harry Carey
by TheRiot Police on Oct 7, 2008 12:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd rather have
Jennie Finch than Prior.
The worst beer I had was pretty good.
by Worf on Oct 7, 2008 12:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You Mark Prior still pitches?
I thought his arm fell off.
I dunno if he’ll ever pitch again in the Majors.
by TheHawkRules on Oct 7, 2008 3:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If you can sign a former 18 game winner
for close to a minor league contract? why not?
by northpaw22k on Oct 7, 2008 8:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Because I'm afraid...
He’ll pull an ovary
The worst beer I had was pretty good.
by Worf on Oct 7, 2008 10:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mark Prior HATES us.
He wont sign under Hendry… he’s bitter at him.
Sides, id rather pay and have Schilling come for a half season than Prior. I loved him while he was with us, but he’s bitter at us…so, too bad, so sad, he’s gone.
by TheHawkRules on Oct 7, 2008 10:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have a better chance signing with the Cubs
Then Mark Prior does.
Now I realize I came up with a crazy idea about signing Manny to play LF and Sori to RF But, where would you put Dunn, Soriano and Bradley?
Bradley is an injury waiting to happen and Adam Dunn would not be someone Cubs fans would be happy with.
by Galvan316 on Oct 7, 2008 11:23 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'd like to see a poll
on which is most important for Cubs to get:
A) Leadoff Hitter
B) Fearsome Slugger
C) Veteran Leader
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Oct 7, 2008 11:38 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
A...
…because even if they can’t add the lefty slugger, it automatically makes the rest of your order better.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
by MPH73 on Oct 7, 2008 11:48 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're on record for getting Furcal, so let's run this down the order
Doing some rough 2009 estimates -
Furcal .350 OBP .415 SLG
DeRo .370/.425
Sori .345/.525
Rami .370/.540
DLee .375/.475
Soto .360/.500
Dome .365/.400
Pie/Riot/Font ?/?
Being devil’s advocate here, I’m looking at a whole lot of RH bats in the middle of this lineup. You could swap Dome or Fontenot up to #2, but that’s still a lot of righties. Maybe that’s not a big deal, but it’s seemed to be a driving principle for Lou in lineup construction.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Oct 7, 2008 12:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think it is safe to say the leadoff hitter will either be Soriano or Theriot
Dependent on whether, as MPH suggests, Lou Piniella is finally willing to take on Alfonso Soriano and do the right thing by the lineup and move him down to the #5 or #6 hole.
"What pressure should I have on me? There's no pressure on me." -- Lou Piniella (10/3/08)
by MDBNIU on Oct 7, 2008 12:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think it is safe to say that the leadoff hitter will either be Soriano or someone not on the team.
If Lou was going to get Soriano to move for Theriot, he’d have done it by now. Lou needs a name to move Soriano. I could be wrong, but that’s my take.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Oct 7, 2008 12:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I tend to agree
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
by MPH73 on Oct 7, 2008 12:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually...
…I have said the better leadoff hitter is Roberts, but Furcal gives you the benefit of also upgrading defense at the SS position. You would have to evaluate which one outweighs the other.
With that said, Furcal would be a huge upgrade over Soriano, simply because you wouldn’t have the prolonged cold spells where he wasn’t getting on base.
One other point. I think part of Lou putting Fukudome in the 2 hole was to give Lowe an early look at a lefty, so he couldn’t keep approaching hitters the same way through the lineup. He could have gone with Fotenot, but we don’t know how bad DeRosa’s calf was and I also think he wanted his best defense out there in game one.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
by MPH73 on Oct 7, 2008 12:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can you keep him on the field? He has a lot of injuries in his past.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Oct 7, 2008 12:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Clearly...
…it would depend on his health and they would have to check that out. But, I was of the understanding it was only this last year he had problems?
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
by MPH73 on Oct 7, 2008 12:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're right. Last year he played in 138 games. The previous 5 years, he averaged
150+. It just seems like he has had a lot of nicks and dings. His reported age is 30. He seems older, but 2000 was his first year.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Oct 7, 2008 1:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dodgers will likely sign Furcal
"What pressure should I have on me? There's no pressure on me." -- Lou Piniella (10/3/08)
by MDBNIU on Oct 7, 2008 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I see no reason why the wouldn't. He has been
very productive for them and he’s only 30. He should have some good offensive seasons ahead of him and they have the money.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Oct 7, 2008 2:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Furcal-Roberts
I agree Roberts is preferrable as a straight-up lead-off choice. And part of why I think that is because of just how streaky Furcal is. Check his 05-06-07 splits. Furcal is always ice cold two months of the year and in 05, it was the whole first half. The problem is that 2B is our position of strength and SS our position of weakness.
Of course, it may be that neither is available to us.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Oct 7, 2008 12:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Leadoff Hitter
Fearsome slugger would be nice but we have Aramis Ramirez and Soriano… each of them adding their own slugging abilities and Ramirez with his clutch hitting… a veteran leader not so much because I recall all year the team saying that this is the best “team” they have played on in terms of in the club house. Everyone got along, everyone was loose, alot of joking around. Wood is a good leader and so is Dempster as far as veterans are concerned. And to be honest with you… wouldnt you consider Lee a good veteran leader… hes not hot headed, he plays good baseball on the field and up to bat.. So yea… Leadoff hitter is what we need
WOW WHAT A SEASON!
by SouthsideCUBSfan on Oct 7, 2008 12:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Adam Dunn
I look at the Cubs and see screaming need for a primetime left-handed hitting run producer. I look at Adam Dunn and see a guy who could hit 50 HRs, drive in 110 and walk 100 times in his sleep at Wrigley. But also a guy who needs to be DHing in the American League.
This all said I would LOVE to explore the idea of signing Dunn to play 1st base. He’s played the position before with not the best results. But it IS worth investigating.
"What pressure should I have on me? There's no pressure on me." -- Lou Piniella (10/3/08)
by MDBNIU on Oct 7, 2008 12:07 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm open to Dunn at 1B
but then you HAVE to get a SS who can throw with accuracy and Aramis’ gold glove hopes will be over.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Oct 7, 2008 12:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just eyeballing a scouting report...
…and not to say I get the best scouting reports because I don’t, but Dunn’s tools are a better match to LF than 1B – he has such bad hands and has a decent arm for a LF, exactly the opposite of the sort of guy you think about at first, a good hands/bad arm sort.
by cwyers on Oct 7, 2008 2:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Dunn at first would have you begging for DLee after about 2 weeks.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Oct 7, 2008 2:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What's the ideal configuration -
theoretically if we signed Dunn and had an opening at 1B and RF would you move Dunn to LF, to RF, move Soriano to RF or move Soriano to 1B?
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Oct 7, 2008 3:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Soriano to 1B?
Sorry, just picturing the hop in a whole new context.
My next sig line quote will also be from Lou Piniella, and the first word will be either "Look", or "Listen", followed by a comma.
by JohnM on Oct 7, 2008 3:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That may not be as bad as you think. He is/was a 2b, though a butcher.
But the wind blew me back via Chicago, In the middle of the night
by N Oakley on Oct 7, 2008 4:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
IMO, you have Dunn in LF and Soriano in RF.
by cwyers on Oct 7, 2008 5:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What kind of OF defense would we see
from a Dunn-Dome-Sori OF? Would it be better than I am picturing? Would the Cubs have to commit to Pie or someone of equal defensive talent to play both Soriano and Dunn?
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Oct 7, 2008 5:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
From every study I've seen, there's not a difference in a player's performance...
…moving from left field to right field. The only issue is the arm, and Soriano’s arm should play in right. Dunn obviously has some defensive issues, but I think they’re workable.
by cwyers on Oct 7, 2008 5:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Prediction: little change
Not much will be done. I could see a Brian (oh geez I don’t want to read about him all winter) Roberts at leadoff. Theriot in the #2 hole. We’ll add a pretty good outfielder, but not a starter. Another left handed bat probably. I think we roll the odds on ‘Dome that he is like most Japanese players and will adjust to MLB pitchers and be OK; with that said, he will not be a power hitter. That’s about all I see for position players. As far as pitching goes, much of this will depend on whether our FA’s seek outside offers. I would assume we want Dempster back along with Wood.
Lastly, I’ll say this all winter. We’ve gone to the playoffs TWO YEARS in a row. We may have to go a few more times to get it right, tweaking our roster a little each year before we get to the big show. I just don’t see a lot of changes.
This is only the beginning....Lou Pinella end of '07 season and Chicago Transit Authority (the band when they were really good).
by mrcubsfan on Oct 7, 2008 12:35 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Some thoughts
In my travels last night I listened to David Kaplan go on a 30 minute rant that was pretty interesting. Worth noting were the following two points.
- Soriano is likely done hitting leadoff. The powers that be realize that this is a bad idea and this is very likely to change.
- Carlos Zambrano needs a major attitude adjustment. Kaplan echoed the sentiments of Steve Stone, saying that Zambrano is turning into another Sammy Sosa. Zambrano on more than one occasion has arrived late to his side sessions, leaving the coaching staff waiting. Kaplan also said that several of Zambrano’s teammates question his work ethic.This seems to mesh with the comments that surfaced in August when Carlos was having physical problems, that Carlos does not do the things that are necessary to maintain his body over the course of a long season.
Here’s where I’d like to see the team go:
- Make some moves within the line-up. Soriano needs to be out of the leadoff spot. We’ve known this for a long time. Further, Lee needs to be out of the #3 spot. I’d be fine w/ Alfonso hitting 3rd if there was someone decent protecting him. I’d prefer to see Soriano dealt, but thats not going to happen.
- Pick up Harden’s option and trade him. Someone would love to have that talent for the low commitment. Personally, I don’t want to go back to the days of Wood and Prior and musical chairs in the pitching rotation.
- Be very careful with the Dempster decision. 4/48 is likely to be the cost and I’m not sure I want to risk those dollars and years on his track record.
- The Cubs need to add a key bat but their financial commitments are going to hamstring them. I think that the starting point is Aramis Ramirez. He puts up big numbers by the end of the season but his consistency is an issue. His post season numbers over his Cubs career are not good. If I were Hendry I’d call the LA Angels GM and see if there is room for a deal there. Aramis was wooed by them before resigning with the Cubs so perhaps he’d waive his no-trade clause to go there. After another quick post season exit I’d imagine that the Angels would like to add someone of Aramis’ stature. The Cubs would allocate those dollars and spot in the line-up somewhere else, hopefully for a left handed bat that can take the ball out of the park. If that person is not a third baseman, I’d seriously consider moving DeRosa over the third base.
Thats my starting point for now. There’s a lot to figure with the pitching staff, especially the relief corps, but I really think the key to not flaming out again is to make some changes to the middle of the line-up.
by dmlichte on Oct 7, 2008 12:40 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Wow
Those are some pretty big changes.
by StevenABQ on Oct 7, 2008 12:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I do not agree about A-Ram
Look, I think one of the knee-jerk things that is happening is that we are assuming that you can make major changes FOR the playoffs and still MAKE the playoffs.
Guys like Aramis and Soriano are necessary for the regular season too.
Soriano may have fundamental things wrong with him that make postseason a problem. But I think Ramirez is just one of those guys that SO FAR, hasn’t hit in the postseason. Bonds was a postseason choker until 2002.
People forget that A-Rod would have been the ALCS MVP in 2004 if Rivera could have saved a game.
Aramis be just fine.
The worst beer I had was pretty good.
by Worf on Oct 7, 2008 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you realize
we’d be no where near as good right?
you’re talking about taking away our best hitter, one of our best pitchers, and a guy (though i agree we shouldn’t bid on in Dempster) that was our #2
that’s starting down a whole lot of talent.
by DartmouthCubsFan on Oct 7, 2008 12:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed, that is straight-up crazy talk
“Change for the sake of change” comes to mind. Harden’s production is literally irreplaceable, Derosa is a huge step down from Aramis as a third baseman offensively (and would then need to be replaced by someone at 2nd), and while I don’t think Dempster can replicate his 2008 numbers, I do think he’ll sign a below-market deal to stay here.
by Wreckard on Oct 7, 2008 1:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It took us almost 30 years
to replace Ron Santo and now people want to throw him away.
The worst beer I had was pretty good.
by Worf on Oct 7, 2008 1:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
its not change for the sake of change
its changing a dynamic that has seen the Cubs win as many games in the post season the last two years as have the Pirates, Reds, Nationals and Mariners.
by dmlichte on Oct 7, 2008 1:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was discussing the starting points...
… and IMO, the first domino to fall needs to be Ramirez. I see him as the most tradeable “superstar”. The result of that is a.) opening up a big chunk of payroll for another acquisition, b.) opening a spot in the middle of the line-up for a good lefty bat and c.) moving a guy who frankly I see as part of the problem with our feast of famine offense.
So you say we’d be nowhere near as good, but the point is that you continue moves, using the salary that is freed up moving Aramis. If they can find another 3B, great. If they can find someone to play CF, RF or 2B, then I’d move DeRosa to third.
As for Harden, I’ll say it again, this guy is moving back to 2004/2005 when there was a ton of uncertainty regarding who could start and when. It didn’t work then and I don’t know why we’d want to see that again. Harden is good when healthy and over the last month and a half, we saw a ton of instability. They had to nurse him along and if they resign themselves to doing this for an entire season, its going to be a major drain on the other starters as well as the middle relievers who have to alter their schedules because Harden is too high maintenance.
by dmlichte on Oct 7, 2008 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're getting rid of guys with no consideration of who you will replace them with
There aren’t very many good 2B or 3B available. It’s unlikely we have the prospects left at this point to offer the Orioles for Roberts – a lot of the guys who we were offering last year are either gone, or less valuable (either their stock has fallen, or they’re a year closer to arbitration, or both).
Who exactly are the available CF, RF, or 2B that will be available?
The criticism of Harden seems borderline silly. I’m not sure how him missing the occasional start hurt us down the stretch, especially when you have able swingmen like Marshall and Gaudin ready to take the ball. Not once did one of our top starters have to take the ball on short rest due to Harden missing a start.
by Wreckard on Oct 7, 2008 2:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
no...
… its just that we don’t know who is available. We’re not GMs with a picture into what players are on the trading block. And we do have players to trade. There are guys in the minor league system, despite the few guys we gave up for Harden.
As for my criticism of Harden being anywhere near silly, do you have a clue about his career? He started 25 games this season. He started 13 games the last two seasons… combined. He started 19 games in 2005 and 2004 was the only season where he started close to 30 games, starting 31. There is a reason that the Cubs got Harden, with an additional potential year of service for a fraction of what the Brewers paid for Sabathia.
by dmlichte on Oct 7, 2008 2:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Of course I am familiar with Harden's career.
I’m asking you this: how does getting rid of him for very little in return (his value will be no higher than it was when we traded for him – in fact, it might be lower since the contract is a little less expensive and he won’t come with Gaudin thrown in) benefit the team more than keeping him and seeing what you get? It doesn’t make any sense.
Of course we don’t know every name that’s available, but there are a lot of safe guesses you can make. Additionally, you can look at the other teams with needs at those positions (hint: for 3b and 2b, there are a lot of teams with needs) to see what your competition would be, and look at what you have to offer in return (our cupboard is not well stocked). You certainly know who’s available on the free agent market at those positions (Orlando Hudson and… I guess that’s it).
I guess I’m just not sure why when you look at improving the team, you set your targets on positions that gave us above-average production all season (3b, 2b, SP) rather than focusing on improving the positions that gave us below-average production all season (SS, RF, CF).
by Wreckard on Oct 7, 2008 2:49 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
If he agreed to a trade...
…I agree Ramirez has the most value on the club.
Now, whether they trade one of their stars (or attempt to), is going to open up a can of worms. With a no trade clause, you are going to have to include the player (his representative) in on those discussions along the way. That bad part is, if a trade doesn’t materialize, you now have a player who knows he isn’t really wanted and you are stuck with him. This is the biggest reason no-trades really blow for the ballclub.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
by MPH73 on Oct 7, 2008 2:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not sure they can trade Ramirez -- or that I want them to
But if they do, I’d like to see them get Figgins. Maybe that opens up the budget for a true #3, because I don’t think it’s Soriano.
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Oct 7, 2008 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Look, Soriano ain't going nowhere
So, where do we want him?
Leadoff? Nope. Tried that
#2? Maybe worse. Moving runners, taking a pitch so a guy can read the pitcher’s move to the plate, etc… are not in his vocabulary
#3? Would be thing of beauty when he’s hot, and you’d be ready to kill him when he’s not. Much the same as now, only with the added bonus of more DPs!
#4? When cold, would provide as much protection for the #3 hitter as a soggy paper towel. When hot, the #3 hitter would be Ruth and Bonds combined. Since he can get hot at a minute’s notice, pitchers would still likely fear him.
#5? An RBI position, pure and simple. I like him best here. His cold streaks would do the least amount of damage if #3 and #4 were on track.
#6-8? Not a logical option, politically…
My point is that there are downsides to a hot and cold hitter no matter where he is. You could argue that he does no more damage as a leadoff hitter than as a #3 or a #5 hitter.
Moving him to #3 or #5 will likely happen.
And there will still be times we hate him
The worst beer I had was pretty good.
by Worf on Oct 7, 2008 12:59 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Heh
I love #6-8? Not a logical option, politically…
Classic, and very true.
by StevenABQ on Oct 7, 2008 1:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I actually don't mean it as an insult
I don’t think his production warrants a drop all the way to 6-8.
The worst beer I had was pretty good.
by Worf on Oct 7, 2008 1:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I tend to agree...
…but there is one thing that is unique about Soriano’s production and that is how streaky it is. Granted, the vast majority of power hitters are streaky by nature, but Soriano takes this to an all new high.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
by MPH73 on Oct 7, 2008 1:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
His streaky nature is why
I believe #5, #6 as a permanent home makes sense.
This team needs consistency from 3/4 and Soriano, what a very good player is not consistent. At 5/6 he can streak and slump without crippling the heart of the order and carry the team and drive home 2/3/4 when hot.
But the wind blew me back via Chicago, In the middle of the night
by N Oakley on Oct 7, 2008 1:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Any serious changes to the team
would most likely require the Cubs to have some payroll flexibility, though new ownership will have a huge impact on that. I can’t possibly see Soriano or Fukudome going anywhere so that leaves Zambrano, Lilly, Ramirez and Lee as the major holders of long term payroll obligations.
I’m not yet sure what I think of the pitching option between Dempster and Harden, but I don’t think both come back. I’m reluctant at this moment to further extend the long term payroll obligations because I’ve got some other ideas for that money and that by itself would eliminate Dempster, so I say Harden stays.
I think the Cubs need to improve at SS and leadoff. To that extent, Furcal seems to fit the bill. If that’s not possible Cabrera would be my second choice. I love Roberts, but I think Fontenot’s time has come and he’s cheap. If Roberts could play SS, he’d be my first choice, but he can’t.
In addition to all that, though, the Cubs team needs a player leader. No one on the roster fits that bill. I would love it if Hendry could explore the possibility of adding Vernon Wells. Since payroll is a concern, I would add him at the expense of Ramirez and Lee if I had to. That’s not to say I am proposing that trade. I’m just saying that pieces have to be taken off before they can be added on.
If Ramirez and Lee are not in the future plans, I’d like to see the Cubs go after Adam Dunn and Hank Blalock. That would immediately give the Cubs more power from the left side.
Formerly NO100
by jerry morales rules on Oct 7, 2008 1:29 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
My blog post is labled the same as yours
I would put it in this thread… but its really long, but go to Ignited Thoughts, my new blog to see what I think on this same topic
WOW WHAT A SEASON!
by SouthsideCUBSfan on Oct 7, 2008 1:40 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
sorry... bad link
Ignited Thoughts – this is the correct link.
WOW WHAT A SEASON!
by SouthsideCUBSfan on Oct 7, 2008 1:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Screw it... this is what I wrote on my blog.....
It has now been a couple days since the rise and fall of the best team in the National League, the Chicago Cubs. I initially was going to come write my review of the collapse the day after doomsday, but decided it would be very angry as it reignites my thoughts from the horrifying weekend. On that note, lets talk about the Cubs future, rather then the total destruction of the Northside Nobody’s.
What exactly do the Cubs need to take it to the next level? This team had it going for them all year. 97 wins, leading the league in come from behind victories and in the top five of almost every category in baseball. How do you throw away something that shattered after it supplied so many positive outcomes? Where do we begin?
Lead-off hitter. Jim Hendry and the Cubs need to address this situation. Sure the Cubs scored more runs and won more games with Soriano at lead-off, but what if there is a Rafeal Furcal or Brian Roberts leading off the game, pushing Soriano to second or even fifth? There would be more base runners ahead of power hitters using their speed to put them in position to win the game when it counts. Soriano’s speed cannot be counted on anymore, and he strikes out far to often in clutch situations to bat first in a Cubs uniform. It would be “heart” replacing “moneybags”, thus when the team reaches the playoffs there will be more fight at the lead-off spot and more flash bulbs going off when Soriano comes up to bat with men on base.
Infield. Lets go around the horn. To say the least, Geovanny Soto is our guy behind the plate. He is a potential Rookie of the Year, and handles the pitching staff with great confidence. Soto contributes well to a high scoring offense, hitting doubles in the gap at a rapid rate, and leaves souvenirs for the bleacher bums when needed most. At first base, it has become common talk to throw Lee under the bus as the Cubs try to focus on change. Ok, so he tied Ron Santo for the mot doubles in team history. But he also led the team in base hits, and is arguably the best defensive first baseman in MLB, nevermind the playoff error. Hes on the Cubs in the playoffs – that is bound to happen. Lee will turn it around with more power next year, and will be hitting balls to the ivy walls at a consistent pace in the 2009 season. My solution: Bat DLee second and work on improving his base stealing effectiveness for next year. At second base we have Mark DeRosa who might be the most important guy in the infield to keep on the team. This man can play. When someone is hurt or needs a break, DeRosa will vacate his natural second base position and hold down the fort wherever need be. He hits consistently and provides great team leadership..he must stay. Fontenot as his backup seems ok from the bench, considering this year was probably his career year. At shortstop we have “The-scrappy-Riot” who surprisingly led the team in OBP, BA and SB. Theriot doesn’t have the best range at shortstop, and he throws like a 10 year old girl with her eyes closed, but he does consistently keep the game going. Perhaps he is the reason why DLee hits in so many double plays, as he is always manning first base when Lee comes up to bat. If we had Theriot in 03’ the Cubs would have scored double the amount of runs they had scored this year as Lee posted much higher power numbers five years ago. Solution: I hate to say it, but put Theriot on the bench or trade him because the Cubs need a lead-off hitter, and that most likely will come from a middle infield position. Theriot can lead off, but not with the effectiveness of a Furcal or Roberts. So, this may be a position of need. At third base we have Aramis Ramirez. He was terrible in the playoffs, and has been consistently terrible in the playoffs in the last six games. That being said, Ramirez is our most clutch hitter and provides the most power and RBI’s on the team. He is a contact hitter, where as most power performers like to strike out at a rapid rate. This one is obvious, keep him.
Outfield. Soriano is stuck there in left with his 135 million dollars, unless some rich organization wants to take the same risk the Cubs took and pick up his massive contract. Fukudome is also a staple next year considering his contact signing coming to the Cubs as a rookie from Japan. Fukudome fell off month to month, each stat tumbling off the cliff while taking a beating all the way to the bottom. He will be fine. Fukudome’s work ethic is unmatched and his personal confidence should be back next year. These Japanese players don’t give up. Don’t be surprised to hear how hard he worked in the off season once spring training begins. Where do we put this sure glove? For now I would say keep him in RF unless a lefty power bat is acquired from that position. In center field the Cubs should not take their chances with Edmonds considering his age and ability to be inconsistent. Edmonds was great for the Cubs in the second half of 2008, but the Cubs need to look forward. I guess that means the Cubs need to rely on Felix Pie. The Cubs have a very positive outlook on Pie calling him as a September call-up, showing they have high hopes for “Pumpkin Pie.” Hopefully he isn’t another “He has potential Patterson.” Reed Johnson should be re-signed and kept on the team, because he is one guy that will not put his head down. Johnson works hard and plays hard which is a great combination for a player in a blue collar city such as Chicago, and has become a fan favorite since his hat bending catch early on in the year.
Pitching. We have an unbelievable pitching staff, but do you really trust that Dempster can repeat what he did this year? Keep him on the team for leadership and clubhouse entertainment, but he is not a one or a two starter. Count Dempster in to be our four guy, rather then our one guy going into the playoffs. He is getting older, but his arm seems to be made of rubber this year. Picking up his option is going to be one of the harder tasks for Hendry in the off season. I would say the same for Lilly, but he has been solid since he put on the cursed Cubs jersey. Keep him, for God’s sake, keep Lilly, and if the Cubs make the playoffs next year, let this guy pitch a game, he deserves it. It goes without question that Zambrano remains our franchise pitcher with that uber large contract he signed this season, but Carlos has yet to win a playoff game.. that needs to change. Rich Harden, what a signing. Harden is a free agent and is at high risk to become another Mark Prior. I don’t know what to think about this. Sign him, but don’t waste too much money doing so. If that doesn’t work, go after C.C. or another ace to tandem with Zambrano throughout the season. Good-bye Marquis! You were a good five starter and it was nice to see you finish the season well, but you need to go. As far as our bullpen is concerned I will keep this simple. Marmol had a great year, unlikely to match his 08’ season but is a solid staple in the bullpen. Howry please leave this city, we don’t want you here, and same goes with you Cotts. Take the bus to Iowa, and if you need directions I will gladly look it up for you. Marshall should be a strong consideration as a four starter, but I personally like him coming in long relief. That being said, he will be signed. As for the rest of the bullpen, they did well, but Hendry might juggle it around a little bit to better prepare this team for the playoffs.
Hendry has got his work cut out, as does Lou. Piniella has still got that heart, but he needs to stick to his old school way of coaching. Never mind these million dollar babies, play the game and coach it the way you know how to coach it. You know… the one that got you a ring?
The Cubs 2008 season was much like a Steak N’ Shake frisco melt at three in the morning. It was GREAT while it lasted, but it always has a painful ending. Wait till’ next year Cubs fans! There is always next year.. so I like to believe.
WOW WHAT A SEASON!
by SouthsideCUBSfan on Oct 7, 2008 1:41 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
My take is a little different
The team played poorly, no doubt. But for the 2nd consecutive year, I really had some doubts about decisions made by our manager in constructing line- ups, and game time decisions. Lou Piniella is the best Cubs manager I have ever seen in my time watching the team since the early ’80s, but there is plenty of room for doubt in his two playoff stints with the Cubs.
1. Why not play our very best against Milwaukee all the way through so we eliminate them, and host the inferior Mets? This had to be an obvious conclusion.
2. Lou pulls Z in game 1 2007 in AZ to save for series final, which never happens. Who knows how series turns if Z finishes the game.
3. Lou benches Fukudome for the final month of the season, and then bats him second in game 1, 8th in game 2, trashes in the media, and benches him against a pitcher he is more familiar w/ than anyone else in the league.
4. Lou leaves Dempster in the game, having watched him barely make it out of the 3rd inning, and walk the bases loaded in the 5th. Why did Marshall and Marquis make the post season roster if not for long relief. Once Demp walked the first batter in the fifth, I have Marmol up in the pen, and he pitches to Manny, and finishes the inning. Then Marshall/ Marquis begin the sixth in long relief, w/ the Cubs still likely in the lead.
5. Lou has publicly stated he was worried about the offense leading into the playoffs, yet does very little to shake up the line up. Johnson never plays, Fontenot plays sparingly, while Fonzy, with his history of playoff gaffs, bats leadoff throughout the series. I would guess that one big reason he was concerned, was Soriano’s mediocre finish to the season. The Soriano/ Fukudome 1/2 slot will never make any sense to me. Theriot/ Fontenot would have made the Dodger pitchers work a hell of a lot harder in front of Lee and Ramirez.
So, where do we go from here? Not that drastically far I say. It is time that Lou handles Soriano as directly as he did Fukudome following game 2. We still have a very good team, have solid free agents who likely will want to re sign for reasonable deals, and have upper management who will continue to bolster the roster. The man who managed the Cubs to consecutive division titles needs to better in the playoffs, as do his players.
"Chicago Cubs fans are ninety percent scar tissue." - George F. Will
by Slakkr on Oct 7, 2008 4:22 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Response
1. As bad as the Cubs played, the Mets would have won 3-0 as well. The opponent doesn’t matter.
2. It was a bad move, but they also lost two more games. Maybe it’s a turning point, maybe not.
3. For the life of me, I dont understand Lou’s handling of Fukudome. I am totally in agreement with you here. I get wanting his defense in Game 1. He should have hit 8th. I do not understand sending him back into center in Game 3. He didn’t do badly the rest of the game, actually, but I don’t get. My only feeling is that Hendry pulled rank.
4. Also agree, but not about the pitcher who should have come in. That was Lilly’s ball to take. He shuts it down.
5. Soriano was going to bat leadoff. That wasn’t going to change. I don’t know what the hell Johnson did to not play. Fontenot should have been in.
The worst beer I had was pretty good.
by Worf on Oct 7, 2008 4:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lilly
makes sense. I hadn’t thought of him. Great. No I’m even more fumed. Thanks
"Chicago Cubs fans are ninety percent scar tissue." - George F. Will
by Slakkr on Oct 7, 2008 4:42 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The Cubs
One of the biggest things expected this offseason, that will impact the franchise, is the ownership change. There is no telling what the new ownership will be like, but I am optimistic about there being a better tomorrow. The Wrigley’s and the Tribune Co., quite frankly, have come up short.
Piniella – I think his job will be harder next season. The 08’ season is going to be a tough act to follow and in some important ways improve upon.
Hendry – The farm system hasn’t produced much. Other than that, I get the impression that Hendry is either getting better at his job or Lou Piniella makes Hendry look like a better GM. My gut says they will keep Hendry around following the ownership change.
Position players – Get Roberts or another viable leadoff hitter and move Soriano down in the lineup or, if possible, off the team. Assuming Fukudome won’t crack the everyday lineup and assuming Edmonds isn’t resigned, also get a couple of lefthanded bats. Defense was sufficient but wouldn’t want any changes to degrade it.
Pitching – So long Harden and so long Howry. Sign Dempster unless his signing blows an opportunity to sign Sabathia. Can’t see both Marquis and Samardzija in the rotation; one or the other.
by AboutTheCubs on Oct 7, 2008 6:01 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I have rambled this idea on other posts
I get a lot of New York news/talk/rumors, The Mets are a team I would look at to deal. I would TRY to move Ramirez, Veal and another player for Wright. Wright has struggled late the last two years, Wright has taken alot of grief because of this. I think Ramy would waive his no trade if New York is on his no trade list. Change of scenery for both. Hey its a wild one but I would make the effort.
I really think the only way the Cubs are going to shake up this team is by trades. Signing a free agent, especially a position player, would most likely force your hand into a trade to accomindate the free agent move.
I believe Dome will improve, I think he has a ton of pride, and he will be a better player, how much, I don’t know.
I would sign Harden, Wood and Dempster.
Of course my to much “acid scenerio”
Cuban purchases the Cubs, Cubs then trade Lee for Roberts, Ramy and others for Wright, Cuban then goes nuts signs CC for 7 years 150 million, SIgns Texieria for 7 years 155 million, Signs Reed Johnson, Harden, and Wood, Then you have your 2009 Cubs:
Roberts-2b
Dome/Derosa-RF
Wright-3b
Texieria-1B
Soriano-LF
Soto-C
Reed/Pie-CF
Theriot-SS
Rotation:
CC
Z
Lilly
Harden
Marquis/Marshall
Now the Iron Butterfly and Jefferson Airplane music stopped, and I found out it was dream.
"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"
by Grockcubs on Oct 7, 2008 7:00 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
First time posting
…but uh…I can’t believe some of the suggestions of moving Soriano to 1st. I have to say the Cubs (at least in the last decade plus I’ve been following the team) have always been fortunate in having a solid 1st baseman. Mark Grace was unmatched, and at the very least, I always ALWAYS feel confident in D-Lee’s ability to hold down on the bag, stretch and make the out. He is solid. He just didn’t have his best year. I think moving him down in the line up would be a help. I didn’t realize his daughter had an illness this year. Life has larger problems behind the scenes, sometimes.
Anyway, back to Soriano: He’s our next Sosa, a streaky strike out artist. Trrrrrrrrrrade him. I would prefer reliability over pure power. I didn’t see a ton of home runs from the Dodgers this series. The changing nature of baseball has left everyone hungry for a home run hitter, but I think at the top comes pitching and those that can get on base and move runners. The glaring holes of a strike out king will ALWAYS bring down a team.
Which leads me to the man with the highest batting average, on base percentage and scrappiest charm of this team: Theriot.
People really want to trade him!?? I feel like he’s a mini-Sandburg (or at least growing into one), and the fact that he tries and gives THAT MUCH effort year round makes me feel better about his future performance. I would never trade Theriot, barring a dip in morale or major injuries, I suppose.
And as for Fukudome…well, I kind of like the idea of enlisting Ichiro, for countrymen sake. :) But assuming he needs another Japanese player to feel ‘comfortable’ on the team is kind of silly. This was a very friendly, welcoming team (from my outsider perspective, of course), and Piniella was extremely patient with him. I’d say maybe…give him another shot, but move him further down in the batting order. 7th and below. It was his first full year here. Maybe he’ll improve. If he dips again next year, bench him, or use him for defense. Find another big hitter/outfielder and play Reed Johnson in place of Soriano.
Pitching: time to focus on a great bench team. To cross sport lines, with my example, I will remind you of the Chicago bulls: the bench was much lauded for being able to take over where Jordan and Co. left off. Who (if anyone) EVER left me feeling reassured that someone would be able to maintain a leave, stave off loaded bases, or at least assuage the damage done by preventing any more runs? Marmol could be ‘lights out’, but we generally reserved him for one inning of relief before Wood as closer. While I think they are a valuable duo, there is no one and I mean NO ONE who filled in as the middle relief position. Maybe Smardjzia (sp?) could blossom, but that would take some extreme season-ing.
Anyway, such are the opines of a 25 year old newbie. Tear apart as you please. :)
by LaurenLovesCubs on Oct 7, 2008 9:42 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Welcome...
1) Agree completely on Lee. I nearly fell over at the thought of Soriano at 1B. I don’t play fantasy baseball, but in the real world, defense counts.
2) Soriano is probably untradeable. The Orioles and Pirates seem to have wised up a bit… Best to move him down and live with it.
3) Theriot has the potential to be our Eckstein. Keep him!
4) Dome stays. Johnson stays, but Soriano has to be in the lineup.
5) Not bad. We tried this with Howry/Eyre. Remember when they were signed? It was AWESOME. Our middle relief will shut them all down! Best bet is to start with a plan, but be ready to adjust in a second.
Good stuff. I would marry you if I wasn’t married.
The worst beer I had was pretty good.
by Worf on Oct 7, 2008 10:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Like Sosa
Soriano in the 3-5 spots would be like a floundering Sosa; good analogy.
Ideally, the Cubs sign a good lead-off hitter and trade Soriano. I was reminded earlier that Soriano batting lead-off is where he does the least damage when he fails to move runners over.
by AboutTheCubs on Oct 7, 2008 11:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nobody wants to trade Theriot.
I don’t think it’s for any fond feelings over Theriot, more over an idea that nobody else wants him. I did spend five minutes weeping when you compared him to Sandburg, though.
Soriano is a bit different case – it’s not that nobody wants him, it’s that nobody wants to give up anything of value for Soriano’s contract. People tend to confuse the quality of his contract for the quality of his play – he’s good at baseball in only about 10 or 20 ways that Reed Johnson is not.
by cwyers on Oct 8, 2008 12:05 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Welcome
Re: acquiring a Fukufriend –
I agree the team was friendly with Dome, but you can only be so friendly when significant language and cultural barriers remain. Other clubs have found that for some Japanese and Cuban players, having more than one of those countrymen helps a good deal. I think it won’t hurt for us to grab a Japanese reliever this offseason and see if it helps. I believe Hitoki Iwase is left-handed and a Chunichi Dragon – good target?
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Oct 8, 2008 10:20 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 



















