Bleed Cubbie Blue: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Steve McNair Found Shot to Death


spread the word

Building A Cubs Champion: The AC Sign Must Go

Tear this sign down!

Since 1945, we as Cubs fans have been subjected to 63 years of really bad baseball. We had hoped that the hurts and pains and disappointments of the last 63 years were about to be assuaged by the best team most of us had ever seen; instead, one of the most spectacular collapses we have ever seen finds us looking for answers.

The answers lie, I think, in baseball-related changes on the field -- whatever will prevent a team that plays so well for six months from collapsing in three games. But what is it we hear about from the mass media? Smashing of pipes in the dugout in Dodger Stadium. Or the guy who's allegedly selling his Cubs loyalty on eBay.

Frivolous nonsense, in other words.

This post is going to be one of an occasional series here, designed to rid Cubdom of the dumb things, the irrelevant things, the stupid off-field things that shouldn't be part of us going into the future. This team has a long and storied history on the field, even when some of that history isn't the best. Should it be celebrated? Some of it -- for example, the pennants and World Series the team did win, and the great individual performances and games -- absolutely. Some of it -- things like the College of Coaches, poor decisions by management and ownership -- should be criticized and will be here, as they have in the past (maybe not enough, in the opinion of some).

So it is in that spirit that I say today:

Lakeview Baseball Club, tear down this sign.

I'll credit this idea to a comment made by BCB reader Shanghai Badger the other day on this very subject, which got me to thinking about it. For a number of years, this sign has kept track of the years since the Cubs won a division title, a NL pennant, and the World Series. It became an "insider" thing; I'd often have to explain what it meant to newbies, and of course all of us wanted to see it read "000000".

But what does that sign actually do, other than to remind us how bad the Cubs have been for a century? You may remember that when Cubs chairman Crane Kenney suggested that the Cubs might stop flying the "L" flag after losses at Wrigley Field, I criticized that idea (and in fact, they never did stop doing this). There's a difference, I think, in what each of these symbols means. Flying the "L" flag after a home loss says only, "We lost today." It's taken down before the next game.

The AC sign says, "We have sucked for 100 years and we're going to remind you of it not only during home games, but every single day of the year," since the sign stays up year-round (though as of yesterday, it hadn't been changed and in past years, it hasn't been changed until well after the next calendar year has begun). It celebrates failure.

Since a digit would have to be added to the sign before next April, I say it's time to get rid of it. Stop reminding us of all the failures. The Lakeview Baseball Club, obviously, is a private club, with no connection to Cubs ownership (other than the financial deal they made with them a couple of years ago), so they are obviously free to do as they please. They also have signs reading "EAMUS CATULI!" (loosely translated, "Let's Go Cubs!" in Latin) and "NEC ASPERA TERRENT" (the motto of the Prince of Wales' regiments, it translates as "Difficulties be damned"). Those are positive messages and ought to stay.

Get rid of the AC sign. Yes, doing that won't win a single game. (Those of you who have asked what I think are the on-field moves the Cubs should make for '09 -- geez, give it some time! The team's organizational meetings, where they'll discuss what happened this year and lay out a plan for next, won't start till October 19.) But it is part of changing the attitude. Look forward to the next 100 years with the attitude said on a T-shirt I once bought (and still own): "CUBS 2000: The Next Millennium Is Ours".

0 recs | Comment 343 comments | Share on Facebook Digg!

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Keep it

  Do I not always here “screw the goat/curse”! Then we shouldn’t hawk on the sign. I like it and think it should stay. This sounds like jsut another excuse as to why the best team in the Nathional League laid down and played horribly. By the way, why not play Reed Johnson instead of Edmonds on any or all of the games or sit one of those other bust outs Soriano, Fukudome for someone with potential like Johnson?

by plumbob on Oct 8, 2008 9:41 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Johnson+RHP < Edmonds+RHP

and the dodgers didn’t throw any lefties

------ TheRiot Squad ------

by RightFieldSucks on Oct 8, 2008 11:07 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Regardless of what the stats said

Reed Johnson deserved more than 0 post season at bats, There was a shot of him foaming at the mouth (game 3) next to the bat rack. Way to go Lou, way to utilize that playoff roster, and don’t bother telling me he can’t hit right handed pitching. I watched him do it (when he was asked) most of the year. Felix got more abs then Reed!

by TheRamZamDLEE on Oct 9, 2008 2:04 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

How is this an excuse?

Al said in the text that the key to winning was chanigng things ON THE FIELD.

The Cubs lost because they played like horeshit (best quote ever from Jim Frey — when something’s horseshit, you gotta say it’s horseshit), not because of the sign. Neither Al nor I said it was because of the sign.

It’s just a stupid reminder of futuilty.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Oct 8, 2008 1:36 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

horeshit..... good thing you finished that quote and cleared up what you meant :)

"It's been surreal," said Cubs rookie catcher Geovany Soto, responding to a question about his unprecedented success and the team's drive to the playoffs. "Let's keep it surreal"

by Madison Cub Fan on Oct 8, 2008 4:48 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Whoops!

Yeah, that would be something else, entirely.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Oct 8, 2008 4:52 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

+063100

We’re good for another 9 years without winning the Division and I think that would be a real long shot, but another 47 without winning a pennant…I may be going out on a limb, but I don’t think that will happen either, so just shift the numbers left and no need to tear it down or add a digit. I guess I like the insider aspect that I get to explain to even long time Cub fans that have no clue what it means. I think the Anno Catuli sign is a goal, not a distraction. If it were, then the winters in Chicago are definitely more brutal than a sign that has some cultural undertones to my beloved Catuli.

Mike=Milton+Eamus Catuli = AC000000

by Cub's Paperboy on Oct 8, 2008 2:48 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

How about...

They put something different on the AC sign using the same amount (or less) numbers/letters?

Example (Not meaning this is what I would want but just to get the point out):

Now: AC006299
Instead: GOCUBSGO

Something like that. Yes, reminding everyone how long it has been isnt good, as much as we would like to see AC000000. In fact if we do win someday soon they could always put that up the next year just to say it was done! But no AC000001+

by AndHart120 on Oct 8, 2008 9:42 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Your GOCUBSGO

is essentially up there already, it’s called EAMUS CATULI!

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Oct 8, 2008 1:04 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

True, true

I agree though that the AC sign can’t go away completely.

by AceCubbie on Oct 8, 2008 7:50 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

At least the Tribe

can GET to the World Series!

Hey, it's a new century!

by cowsarecool220 on Oct 8, 2008 12:36 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Interesting...

But if I may disagree with you on several points.

1) The Sun-Times also had stories on Fukudome, including comments from him about what he plans to do in the off-season, and a story on Harden perhaps needing surgery. Hardly fluff.

2) I think childish vandalism in response to losses is a valid story. To me, it speaks to the character, or lack therof, on the team. I never saw any stories of Yankees smashing anything after an ALDS loss. I do agree the loyalty/E-Bay thing is goofy, but I don’t think anyone sees it as more than it is, a goofy feature.

3) I don’t see how keeping the “L” flags and getting rid of the numbers can be reconciled. Both celebrate failure. Everyone does indeed know it’s been 100 years (and counting) But everyone knows the Cubs lost too. I could see the need for the flag in pre-Blackberry days, but c’mon, everyone knows.

Keep one, keep both. I personally couldn’t care less if they got rid of them both, or kept them both. They are such non-entities that I don’t care.

4) So, the response is “jeez, give it time” to questions, but the mass media is somehow failing by not providing answers???

The worst beer I had was pretty good.

by Worf on Oct 8, 2008 9:48 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I explained the difference.

The L flag doesn’t “celebrate failure”. It says, “We lost today”.

The AC sign celebrates failure by reminding us of the drought 24/7/365. I’m sure you see the difference.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Oct 8, 2008 9:52 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

To me it's a distinction without a difference

We’re just quibbling over time frames. One reminds us we lost that day and one reminds us we lost for years.

To me, it’s still reminding of losing. Just because one lasts less time.

The worst beer I had was pretty good.

by Worf on Oct 8, 2008 9:57 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Wrongo

The L and W flags, were a service (especially in days past when mass media was not on every store window and loud speaker) to people on the EL riding past the field. From a glance they could see the result of that days games. Not unlike the times I have been downtown and donning a Cubs cap or shirt, am asked by a passerby the result of the game that day. The AC sign is a reminder of a century drought it serves no purpose other than to remind people of that drought. Its as dumb as the “lovable losers” moniker and other dimunutives. Scrap it.

by StevenABQ on Oct 8, 2008 11:10 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Exactly.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Oct 8, 2008 11:11 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

+1

In addition, one is by the team, the other is not.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Oct 8, 2008 3:13 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It's still a part of it, (The bigger picture) and

asking (or telling) these people to take it down is absurd. I thought we acknowledged that signs and all the rest have no bearing on the play that takes place on the field.

I have an Idea, next year (yes I just said that) when Fukudome or Sorinao goes 0-4, we just won’t talk about it. We’ll just show a clip of bunnies frolicking in a meadow, to pass the time pleasantly .We don’t wasn’t to put negative thoughts in out players head now do we?

by TheRamZamDLEE on Oct 9, 2008 2:39 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Hmmm

I don’t think any of us are part of a group that is formally asking them to take it down. We’re just pointing out the frustration of individuals and groups that take it upon themselves (some for profit, others for not) to create slogans, signs, whatever to bring up something that has no bearing on the current status of the team. Its gimmicky and annoying, and tends to make it appear as though that is all fans care about (ie; we have the loveable losers…thats all we need). I’m not calling for the LBBC to get rid of the sign…just saying it is dumb, and I would be fine without it — to me it is not part of any Cubs tradition. I’m also not suggesting as some may have, that such negativity is the cause of the Cubs poor post-season performance. Baseball is full of ups and downs, and we do not need a “clip of bunnies frolicking” to protect us from negative thoughts. But I think its fair game to point out when something, that may be viewed as a Wrigley tradition by the media and other, is stupid.

by StevenABQ on Oct 9, 2008 2:26 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It's nice to see...

that you’ve moved into the next stage of grief Al.

by Damen Jackson on Oct 8, 2008 11:45 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

+1 x 4

And that auction is going to charity, with the winner receiving a donation receipt. Yeah, it’s dumb, but at least it goes to a good cause.

by dr stabbingworth on Oct 8, 2008 10:27 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

to me the sign has always been hopeful

counting down the years till the Cubs win, rather than the other way around.

I might feel differently if I had been alive for more of these years.

I don’t see it as very different from hanging a championship banner commemorating a pennant or world series—if Wrigley had banners with 08 and 45 on it, wouldn’t that be the same thing to anyone who could count?

by TC Cubby on Oct 8, 2008 9:49 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It doesn't "count down the years till the Cubs win".

How does it do that? It counts UP the years of failure.

If the team had championship banners, those would celebrate SUCCESS, not failure.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Oct 8, 2008 9:53 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

because

while the number might count the years from the loss, the whole purpose of the sign is to celebrate when it is all rolled to zero’s.

it just puts into numbers the thought that “all the waiting will make the winning even more special.”

by TC Cubby on Oct 8, 2008 9:56 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   1 recs

Yep

One day, when they finally drop 00 down into those slots it will have been worth the wait.

by dr stabbingworth on Oct 8, 2008 10:28 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It was cute when it first went up

It has become a parody of itself

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Oct 8, 2008 1:38 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I get your thought process here.

It’s kind of like a glass is half full or half empty argument. My view is usually just be glad there is water in the glass, period.
I have no real opinion of the sign, it’s just there and has been for awhile. I’d be ok without it.

My heart is breakin, head is achin, stomach is churnin, acid reflux is burnin, but I will ALWAYS be a Cubs fan.

by love the ivy on Oct 8, 2008 4:53 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

None of us like being reminded of failure

but I accept it as a part of life. I don’t like the sign but I also know that reality is reality. You can face your failure or ignore it. As a lifelong Cub’s fan I have come to realize that the ups and downs of watching the Cubs is much like the ups and downs of life. “You take the good; you take the bad. You take them all and there you have. The facts of life.”

"We’ve still got a long ways to go, I don’t like to get giggly over things in July. But the team’s playing well, they really are. They’re playing with confidence, and it shows."

by Cubster on Oct 8, 2008 9:57 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

"but I also know that reality is reality"

Well the whole point is that sign is not ‘reality’. It is a pointer to futility. The cubs not winning a World Series in 100 years is reality. Why do we need that reminder? What purpose does it solve?

by cubsnlinux on Oct 8, 2008 1:37 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

How is it not reality?

cubsnlinux: “The cubs not winning a World Series in 100 years is reality.”

I must be missing something…

by TheRamZamDLEE on Oct 9, 2008 2:48 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I see it as more of

an acknowledgment then a celebration, sure they make money off of it. And if the Cubs want to change it that bad, WIN SOMETHING!!!

by TheRamZamDLEE on Oct 9, 2008 2:43 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

10 Years Without A Division Title

would mess the sign up. Without adding numbers, the sign could read AC063100. The single zero after the “C” would be for years after division title. If the Cubs go 10 years without a division title, another space will be needed.

The sign doesn’t bother me. Poor play in the postseason does.

"The big possum walks late." - Harry Caray

by memphiscub on Oct 8, 2008 9:56 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I agree with Al regarding the AC sign

In regard to Worf, Al already pointed out that the L flag only says that they lost that day. The AC sign says, or will say, we haven’t been able to get the job done in 100 years. What’s the point in that? If my fiancee pointed out to me how many interviews I’ve gone on without landing a new job, I’d end up getting pretty discouraged, and I’d end up in a fight with her. If the Cubs are something that Lakeview loves, then take the sign down. All it’s saying is, “Hey guys, congratulations on another year of failure. Oh yeah, also grats on winning the division…” It’s cruel, and if we’re looking at this like a relationship, then the side Lakeview is on certainly isn’t helping matters.

I will also say that after all the games I went to where they lost, in recent years anyway, leaving the bleachers and seeing that sign was a pretty aggravating sight. It’s not really helping anything.

by Craig in South Bend on Oct 8, 2008 9:56 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Get rid of the sign...

But I also say get rid of the “L” flags.

I personally don’t think it matters all that much. If we’re going to get rid of all symbols of failure and despair, maybe we should fire Santo, tear down Wrigley and change the team name to the “Grizzlies”

The worst beer I had was pretty good.

by Worf on Oct 8, 2008 9:58 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   1 recs

Have to

agree with Al on this, I think there is a clear distinction. One is current news — the other is a “reminder” of continued lack of success. It kind of reminds me of those billboards that count up how many smoking deaths there are. The L flag is a true Wrigley field tradition and it is tied to the history of the park itself.

by StevenABQ on Oct 8, 2008 11:15 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

"we should fire Santo"

Uh..why? I don’t see Santo wearing a black T-Shirt with ‘1969’ on during every Cub game. Have you?

by cubsnlinux on Oct 8, 2008 1:40 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Dude...

You totally whiffed on that one.

by TheRamZamDLEE on Oct 9, 2008 2:52 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I disagree.

This entire organization is weighed down with the expectations of fans and a lazy media who will continue to remind fans of the goat, the curse, the 100 years etc.

Whomsoever said that in order to win a championship a very unique, and probably very young, team will need to go out and play hard without care for the sign on Sheffield or anything else, for that matter.

It’s not the sign. It’s not any other reminders of the futility of this club in the last century. It’s simply down to a group of very well-paid men who are paid to ignore history, ignore the pressure and play well every day.

*Synth intro to "Jump"*

by SouthsideCub on Oct 8, 2008 9:59 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Part of the problem is the Cubs are complicit in those reminders.

How many “curse-related” publicity stunts has the team allowed at Wrigley Field over the years? There was the priest blessing the dugout in the NLDS this season, the media occaisionally staging photo-ops with goats on the playing field, and so on – not the Cubs’ ideas, to be sure, but I would presume they have control over what the media is allowed to do on the field. At some point, somebody had to approach a media-relations person and say, “We want to take pictures of this goat wearing a Cubs hat in the dugout…” THE TEAM NEEDS TO SIMPLY SAY NO TO THAT. Somebody is always going to engage in shenanigans related to the team’s history, and the only way to change that is to win it all. However, until that day comes, is it too much to ask for the Cubs to not allow such things within the ballpark itself?

"I see great things in baseball. It's our game - the American game." - Walt Whitman

by hip2bsquare on Oct 8, 2008 10:32 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

EXACTLY!!

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Oct 8, 2008 10:34 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

+100000000000000000

"Manny Trillo is coming in to pinch run. You know, for a lot of teams, you would pinch run [i]for[/i] Manny Trillo." - Harry Caray

by Archie on Oct 8, 2008 12:09 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The media suggests that our love affair with the Cubs would end if they won the WS.

Garbage! Did “Red Sox Nation” retire when they finally won? Er, no.

Only one team per year can win the World Series. You can make the argument that the season is a failure for the other 29 teams that didn’t win it all.

A balance can be struck. Consistent playoff appearances are nice. Being competitive in the playoffs is the next step. Play well, advance to the NLCS and see what happens. A World Series appearance would be a huge step to stop the “curse” talk.

Get 'em on, Get 'em over, Get 'em in!

by DKT on Oct 8, 2008 1:21 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I love good use of the word shenanigans!

Especially in a great post like this :-D

My heart is breakin, head is achin, stomach is churnin, acid reflux is burnin, but I will ALWAYS be a Cubs fan.

by love the ivy on Oct 8, 2008 4:57 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

No one said it was the sign that caused them to lose

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Oct 8, 2008 1:39 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Lose the Blue "L," as my Blackberry can tell me the damn score.

It’s still has its’ own karmic problem. But, why not hang some banners that say Division Champs, 1984, 1989, 2003, 2007, 2008. At least this is a postive. This is a common practice at just about every ball park. Even the Rockies have hung a sign “Wild Card Champs.”

The AC sign is on somebody’s house. We can rail about it, but it’s out of our hands. At least we can suggest the Cubs change some of their policies.

by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Oct 8, 2008 10:01 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The Rockies also...

Could say 2007 NL Champs

The worst beer I had was pretty good.

by Worf on Oct 8, 2008 10:04 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

they have the flags on the roof with the years of the playoff appearances.

I guess they could do more, but it’s not like the completely ignore them.

---AC 00 00 00 - Believe

by mjk83 on Oct 8, 2008 10:10 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

We can e-mail them and suggest that they take it down

as at least two of us have already done. They can ignore us; that’s their right.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Oct 8, 2008 1:40 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

YES!!!!!

Dump the G-d-forsaken, stupid, moronic AC sign!

I despise it! I will ALWAYS despise it!

McCain / Palin: The POW / WOW! Ticket

by Goat Whisperer on Oct 8, 2008 10:01 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The focus should be...

…on what is happening on the field and not what is going on in the stands, rooftops or any of the other garbage. I understand some of that is part of the lore of Wrigley, but as a long time fan of the Cubs and baseball in general, I have always been turned off by the sideshow BS.

Every team has true fans as do the Cubs, but I also believe the almost “cult” following of the Cubs has created a lot of folks who are there for the show and not what is happening on the field. Because of the popularity, there is probably no way around that, but is sure as hell just seems to be a lot of folks looking to bring attention to themselves.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Oct 8, 2008 10:07 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Exactly my point.

Get rid of the sideshow. Make it about baseball.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Oct 8, 2008 10:10 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

+101

Never, but NEVER, put ketchup on a hot dog.

by CaliCub on Oct 8, 2008 1:29 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Waitwaitwait

I know that I’m in the minority on remembering the history (good and bad) of the Cubs, so I usually refrain from commenting on this kind of stuff. But, with all due respect, MPH73, you kind of pissed me off.

You can be a “true” fan of the Cubs and also be interested in the “sideshow” stuff. As someone who suffered through the 66-96 season listening to many of the games on XM Radio (and avoiding the urge to impale myself while doing it), I resent the implication that people who are interested in the Cubs’ history — and, like it or not, 100 years and the Goat and Bartman are part of our history — are somehow only interested in the sideshow. Sure, there are some of those folks out there; we all probably know a few.

But I can’t understand this mindset that Cubs fans that pay attention to those things are somehow “less than” other Cubs fans. It happened, for crying out loud. Do Cleveland fans hang up a sign like this? No. But they damn sure discuss the “another year without the WS” thing. And there’s nothing wrong with that. It’s a part of who they are as an organization and a fan base, just like the Cubs’ failures of the last century are a part of who we are as an organization and a fan base.

Heritage is good and bad. Ignoring part of it is just drinking Kool-Aid.

by cocknfire on Oct 8, 2008 11:48 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Addendum

Yes, I know the Goat and Bartman had little or nothing to do with the losses. But they still happened.

by cocknfire on Oct 8, 2008 11:49 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Your entitiled...

…to your opinion.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Oct 8, 2008 12:04 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Taking the sign down would not be ignoring it

Leaving it up celebrates it.

As Al might say, I trust you can see the difference.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Oct 8, 2008 1:41 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I can see the difference

I don’t have any problem, per se, with taking the sign down. That wasn’t my issue with what MPH73 said. My issue was his seeming suggestion that someone can’t take an interest in the “sideshow” elements and be a “true” Cubs fan who’s interested in the baseball game at the same time.

I also think things like taking a goat out on the field and having the dugout blessed and that kind of crap should stop. That’s not what I’m talking about. I’m saying that the Cubs’ history, good and bad, should be acknowledged as such, and it doesn’t make one a worse fan for doing so. That’s all.

by cocknfire on Oct 8, 2008 3:23 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

In that, I agree with you completely

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Oct 8, 2008 4:41 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I agree with this too.

It is unavoidable for a Cubs fan to want to know where their team came from and how it has morphed into what it is today. And unless you are the Yankees or maybe the Cards, there is a lot of the bad, and the ugly, with the good sprinkled in here and there. No matter how much we want some or most of it to be gone, it can’t just be tossed out.

My heart is breakin, head is achin, stomach is churnin, acid reflux is burnin, but I will ALWAYS be a Cubs fan.

by love the ivy on Oct 8, 2008 5:08 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

How about some better flags/banners

that show the successes of the team instead of just the small ones on the roof with the year on them? The 1908 flag looks the same as ones that are up there for the division champ and wild card champ teams.

Use the banners for the Bulls at the UC for example. The division banners and NBA champ banners are quite different. The Champ banners have what happened and in what year on them. They arent just a little square that says 1991, 1992, 1993, 1996, 1997, and 1998. Not that this would help the Cubs win any more but would be nice looking to show what has (even if little) been accomplished. Now where they would hang I have no idea lol

by AndHart120 on Oct 8, 2008 10:09 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Dickey Simpkins

takes his family to see that banner every year.

Fukudometer: Created 3/31/08 Wrigley Debut 4/5/08 WGN and Japan TV Debut 4/6/08 Sun Times Debut: 4/20/08 Coffee Table Debut: 7/17/08 (http://www.wearecubsfans.com)

by Fuk-U-Meter on Oct 8, 2008 10:28 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don't agree

I don’t think it celebrates failure but hope but beyond that I don’t want to blame the outside crap. If it won’t win or effect a single game don’t fixate on it. What matters is ON the field not the rooftops.

"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry

by Doggie Stalker on Oct 8, 2008 10:09 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Exactly my point.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Oct 8, 2008 10:10 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You lost me there

it won’t change what happens so tear it down ? Ok but how is that different from the folks convinced that is day games and Wrigley
that are the problem so we should tear it down or we will never win. Does it really change how the players will feel and if it would than they would never win anyway.

PS the Red Sox did to win by doing something goofy. THE WHOLE DAMN TEAM was “goofy”. I kind of think that was what was missing this at least in the post season. Nothing was goofy and from the start the players never had any fun. That to me was the saddest thing of all.

"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry

by Doggie Stalker on Oct 8, 2008 10:19 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I agree with you again.

And once again, you have, in a way, agreed with my point. I think these guys got too tight because whether they said so or not, the whole “100 years” thing was weighing on them. Get rid of the obvious signs of this, that’s the first step.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Oct 8, 2008 10:23 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

They couldn't hit good pitching

Maybe the whole 100 years thing weighed on them, maybe not. But the fact is they lost because they couldn’t get hits off 3 good pitchers. I really doubt Soriano cares at all about 100 years or bringing Chicago its championship (I’m not saying he doesn’t care about winning, though). I know you’re talking about changing a culture, but what we really needed was guys who could hit in the clutch. Removing this sign won’t change that.

by dr stabbingworth on Oct 8, 2008 10:33 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   1 recs

Somebody did a number on that pipe though...

best hit of the series. Short, compact swing resulting in solid contact. I’m sure Gerald Perry was proud.

by hokie316 on Oct 8, 2008 10:40 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   1 recs

And I don't believe a wood bat would cause that much damage on steel

or copper or whatever metal the pipes are made of. If they broke the pipe, it was a team effort with some hardcore blunt object.

One day I hope to come up with something worthy of this space.

by chilango2 on Oct 8, 2008 10:47 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Pipes have joints...

…and a swiftly swung bat, could certainly do some damage.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Oct 8, 2008 11:20 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Players....

….will never never never admit outside pressure effected their performance. In reality, pressure is real in athletics and sometimes guys handle it well and sometimes they don’t, and I think there are many factors that go into that. One of the most important ones (in team sports), is who your teamates are and how they perform. I will continue to say, if the Cubs would have had 1 or 2 guys who stepped up on their own and refused to let the team go down in the heap it did, it would have had a contagious effect, and the series could have turned on a dime.

If you ever saw Greg Norman in some of those major championships that he lost, that is exactly what the Cubs did as a team. Norman would look like a world beater for 63 holes and then the wheels would come off completely. The Cubs regular season was like Greg Norman’s first 63 holes and the playoffs like his last 9.

I don’t know how Hendry will change the club, but when something like that happens, it almost forces you to certain changes, that send the appropriate message to the club.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Oct 8, 2008 10:33 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

This is why...

… they need to not only have good players who play well as a team — which they did for the first 161 games — but someone who will LEAD them by saying, “The outside crap doesn’t matter!”

The 2008 Cubs had no one like that. I thought Ryan Dempster could be that guy, but he couldn’t do it, either.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Oct 8, 2008 10:35 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

From a psychological standpoint...

…the Ryan Dempster start in game one was probably debilitating to the club, because they had no one that stepped up after that to take charge.

Dempster probably was the one guy they looked at as this guy who keeps us loose in the clubhouse and nothing fazes this guy. When he went out and walked 7 guys in 4 2/3, they saw a guy they thought would handle it, crumble in front of their eyes. Beyond that, no one else stepped up and did anything to change the momentum and the ship was on its way down.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Oct 8, 2008 10:40 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think you nailed it right here.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Oct 8, 2008 10:42 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Steve Philips

I know he gets bashed around here a lot, but he had a good point on the radio this morning. He was asked why (successful) post season experience is important. He said that anyone can succeed in the playoffs when things are going well for them. It is when mistakes are made that the experienced players don’t panic and pick themselves and their teammates up, keeping a positive focus that prevents a team-wide slide. Though he was talking about the Red Sox, not the Cubs, I think this was the best post-mortem on the Cubs’ NLDS that I’ve heard.

by TC Cubby on Oct 8, 2008 10:49 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I agree with him...

…on championship runs, all those teams have 1,2 or maybe 3 guys that just won’t allow the team to tank when things are going south. They don’t have to be super stars, just guys that do certain things that give you life.

When the Cubs got beat in 03, the Marlins had Pudge, Beckett and others that just wouldn’t let the team fold when things looked bad. The Red Sox had guys and I’m not sure the Cubs have any guys that fit that mold.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Oct 8, 2008 11:27 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

we need more players that don't care.

As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.

by santoswoodenlegs on Oct 8, 2008 11:28 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I thought Ken Rosenthal's analysis was interesting.

He said the Cubs should do what the Red Sox did, keep banging on the door.

The Red Sox repeatedly failed in the postseason before they finally succeeded with the ultimate prize, the WS trophy.

The Cubs long history of losing is in the regular season. If they keep getting in the tournament every year they will eventually win it all.

Hey, it's a new century!

by cowsarecool220 on Oct 8, 2008 12:44 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

But the real difference

was the BoSox actually had playoff performers…

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Oct 8, 2008 12:48 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Not until 2004

they had plenty of other postseason failures, leading to a period of angst and hand-wringing, similar to what Cubs fans are experiencing now.

I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg

by Trey2317 on Oct 8, 2008 12:58 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Exactly,

and the point is if you keep making the playoffs every year, eveventually, you will break through.

Hey, it's a new century!

by cowsarecool220 on Oct 8, 2008 1:58 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

exactly

I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg

by Trey2317 on Oct 8, 2008 2:05 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I totally agree with you here,

but be prepared to hear from the, here we go again accepting a not quite as bad failure as something great and although they are doing better we should expect nothing but perfection folks.

I am totally disappointed in the way this team stunk it up last week. The facts are though that this was still an amazing and historic season. The number of wins at home, Z’s no-no, amazing comeback wins, the most wins in the NL, winning back to back NLDS titles, both Chicago teams in the playoffs, and probably lots I can’t even come up with right now. It stings now, but I really hope even the most angry of fans come to embrace what a season this really was.

My heart is breakin, head is achin, stomach is churnin, acid reflux is burnin, but I will ALWAYS be a Cubs fan.

by love the ivy on Oct 8, 2008 5:20 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The Red Sox of 04

Did not have any magic formula….unless you believe that Curt Schilling, his bloody sock, and Tito had that much effect on them in 04. For the most part they fielded the same set of everyday Core Players that they fielded in 04 and had the same pitchers.

It is definately one of the most amazing things I have seen in my lifetime in playoff baseball but I refuse to believe that they somehow were any less tight going into the ALCS in 04 than they were going into it in 03. They made some big plays in game 4 and got the ball rolling. If that would have been a 5 game series, they would have been called chockers again…not a band of idiots. As I said below, I am sure that you can find artciles for the Boston papers indicated that they were choking it again prior to that game 4.

"Aw, how could he (Jorge Orta) lose the ball in the sun, he's from Mexico." -- Harry Carey

by TheRiot Police on Oct 8, 2008 2:02 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

*03*

"Aw, how could he (Jorge Orta) lose the ball in the sun, he's from Mexico." -- Harry Carey

by TheRiot Police on Oct 8, 2008 2:02 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

there were plenty of articles

I think Shaughnessey wrote a column to that effect following Game 3

I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg

by Trey2317 on Oct 8, 2008 2:06 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

YESSSSSSSSSSS!

For all the complaining, we made the playoffs two years in a row. We’ll get it, it may just take some time. I agree with getting the one player that can drop dime on anyone. We don’t have that hitter in our lineup and the only one who comes close as a leader is DeRosa.

This is only the beginning....Lou Pinella end of '07 season and Chicago Transit Authority (the band when they were really good).

by mrcubsfan on Oct 8, 2008 5:14 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Soriano is smiling somewhere...

oh wait..by “don’t care” you mean something completely different

by cubsnlinux on Oct 8, 2008 1:48 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

not necessarily...

As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.

by santoswoodenlegs on Oct 8, 2008 2:07 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Look at Uncanny Manny

Last year he said who cares if they didn’t win when they (Boston) were on the verge of elimination, they ended up wining it all.

Yes that was ’04 World Series MVP Manny Ramirez

by TheRamZamDLEE on Oct 9, 2008 3:25 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I agree too

The Cubs just didn’t seem to have anyone to lead by example. It probably was likely to be Demp but then he starts out with control problems and I’m still pissed that pitching coach never went out to try to change the tempo of the game – if nothing else – until after walk #7 and the granny.

If there’s one coach I wouldn’t mind see leaving it’s him.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Oct 8, 2008 1:14 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I have never seen...

…the infatuation with Rothschild either. The Cubs have led or been very near the top in walks given up for his entire tenure.

I know that goes along with strikeout pitchers, and the Cubs have been at the top with those, but we all know walks will bite you in the ass.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Oct 8, 2008 1:22 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Well, I think they had someone who TRIED to take charge...

…and that gentleman’s name is Carlos Zambrano. The problem was his defense went to hell behind him, he gave up one key hit and then the offense screwed the pooch (as some are wont to say) for the rest of the game.

And once Game 2 was lost, it was just a matter of waiting for the death blow. The team was too demoralized – and the Dodgers had too much talent and momentum – for any miracle comebacks to occur.

So this is how it ends.

by dat cubfan daver on Oct 8, 2008 11:30 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Thats why it was a total...

…team collapse and is really bothersome.

I got a kick out of all the pundits that said all the pressure was on the Dodgers in game 3. Are you kidding me? You could tell the Cubs ship was sinking and the Dodgers smelled blood because the Cubs let them smell blood.

The only way the pressure switches to the Dodgers is if the Cubs would have gotten out to a nice lead in game 3 and won it. But that was not going to happen without a couple guys putting the team on their back and saying “lets go”.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Oct 8, 2008 11:41 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yes, very good point

Forgot about Z actually keeping his cool (for him at least) during the defencive meltdown. I was so wound up with the IF failing that I forgot about Z.

IT was double-whammy. Demp walks 7, they lose. Then the next guy who can honestly be viewed as a team leader, has his defence go south the next night…wow, now I think it was even worse going to LA on Saturday than I originally thought.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Oct 8, 2008 1:25 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

And Rothschild sat on the bench

with his thumb up his ass watching Demp struggle in every inning except the 4th.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Oct 8, 2008 12:54 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Lets take the 04 Red Sox Example

While I agree they seemed to be loose and made an unbelievable run but really how much of that happened because of who they were. Outside of Schilling, I am pretty sure that the same core players were part of their 03 debacle which was similar in nature to our recent debacles…if not worse.

I can’t disagree that the Cubs seemed tight but I also can’t agree that the Red Sox were not tight in 04 leading up to game 4. You could probably go back to the Boston Globe and find article after article about their tightness after each Games leading up to 4. I think/know somebody made a big play (maybe even by shear luck) and the tightness went away and they went on an 8 game winning streak that happened to occur in the playoffs. Think about if LBR pulls that pitch in the 7th inning of game 3 for a double? Who is to say that would not have turned the worm so to speak.

I just don’t buy this choke crap…they did not play as we expected but to suggest that the choked it away is to suggest that the Dodgers are not any good. This is why the players get tight….people make rash generalizations on a sample size that is too insignficant. The media (print, radio, internet, tv) get paid to sensationalize the good and the bad. Everyone, fans and players, need to take what these folks say with a grain of salt.

"Aw, how could he (Jorge Orta) lose the ball in the sun, he's from Mexico." -- Harry Carey

by TheRiot Police on Oct 8, 2008 12:54 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

One reason I'm against this...

Is for the same reason I was against the destruction of the Bartman baseball, the various attempts to apologize for the Billy Goat thing and the blessing of the dugout.

It has no effect, and to acknowledge its effect is detrimental.

The Red Sox didn’t break the curse by doing anything goofy. They broke it by winning.

The worst beer I had was pretty good.

by Worf on Oct 8, 2008 10:11 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

And how did they do that?

In part, by saying, “We’re not going to focus on this stuff anymore” — they called themselves “idiots” and decided not to let any of it bother them. They put the focus on themselves only, on the field.

That’s what the Cubs need to do. Getting away from the off-field distractions is the first step.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Oct 8, 2008 10:14 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Right... the players did it

No one connected to the team held any voodoo ritual. No one held a public book burning of “The Curse of the Bambino”

They shut up, sacked up, had fun and won.

At some point, we all should start pondering the notion that this team just hasn’t been good enough to win the World Series in 100 years.

The worst beer I had was pretty good.

by Worf on Oct 8, 2008 10:17 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Again, I can see the point...

Or at least, I can see where it wouldn’t hurt.

But I still don’t get how you can reconcile leaving the “L” flag up and tearing the sign down.

No one else flies “L” flags. They just… move on.

The worst beer I had was pretty good.

by Worf on Oct 8, 2008 10:21 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

which is yet another reason why Wrigley is unique

I like difference much more than conformist.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Oct 8, 2008 1:26 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

"Usually, in the game of baseball, the team that scores more runs wins the game." -Tim McCarver

"I see great things in baseball. It's our game - the American game." - Walt Whitman

by hip2bsquare on Oct 8, 2008 10:47 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

There's more to it than scoring runs, right?

In the 1960 W.S. the Yankees outscored the Pirates 55-27. Pirates won the series 4 games to 3.

Irreverence is irrelevant's revenge.
Dean Young

by Herr Pfannkuchen on Oct 8, 2008 2:27 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

And in all 4 games they won, the Pirates scored more runs than the Yankees

Which, I guess, was Mr. McCarver’s “point”, if you can call it that.

"I see great things in baseball. It's our game - the American game." - Walt Whitman

by hip2bsquare on Oct 8, 2008 2:42 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'm not sure that I buy the validity of that argument.

I could just as easily say the Rays are in the playoffs this year because the whole team got mohawks.

Seems like the Red Sox did something hair related during the ‘idiots’ year, too.

Of course, there is no AC sign at Dodger Stadium. What is the reason for that loss when there isn’t a reminder staring them in the face?

Sorry Al, seems like the AC sign is an arbitrary thing to pick on that really has no significance.
Like the comment below mine says, if the players showed up, took care of business and made it seem like they’d actually played the game before, that would have made a difference.

If the Cubs make the playoffs again next year, should the Cubs outlaw celebration in the clubhouse because it would be a remind of the futility from the previous 2 years? Do they paint over the Budweiser house because the players might be reminded that all the years it’s been there, they have won a WS?

by ScottT on Oct 8, 2008 5:27 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

If you have ever been to a game at Fenway...

…there is a definate feeling that the crowd is focused on the game 100%. At Wrigley, its not quite to that level from the crowd.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Oct 8, 2008 10:21 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Why?

1. Because BoSox fans are immersed in the game, all of them, not a smaller group like us. We’re diehards, unfortunately the ballpark isn’t completely full with folks all like us.

2. Wrigley is a 41,230 seat seasonal outdoor bar…

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Oct 8, 2008 12:46 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

There are plenty of fans at Fenway...

who are just there to have fun, drink a few beers and sing ‘Sweet Caroline’.

by hokie316 on Oct 8, 2008 12:53 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It's just not as well documented as Wrigley

And things like the 15-baseball throw when the Reds were here early in the season only amplifies the “drunk Cub fan stereotype”.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Oct 8, 2008 1:06 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Its only going to get worse...

…In my opinion, the “fans” who attend the games and make up the collective “whole” seem to project a feeling of “collectively rookie” or “collectively touristy” more each year. I think this trend has been on a downward slope for a few years now.

It seems to me that the longer we lose, the more the odds are that we will win eventually, and that fact alone draws more “visitors” to the park – especially during a winning season.

It is a bizarre feeling actually, almost like a red-headed step-child type of feeling – which I did not sense at all until a few years ago. Maybe it is just me getting older, though.

"Just win tonight" - derv

by derv on Oct 9, 2008 8:42 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think that criticism is unfair.

The Red Sox play the majority of their home games at night and the Cubs play the majority of their home games during the day. That makes a big difference in the atmosphere becuase of the crowd that can physically COME to the game!

Hey, it's a new century!

by cowsarecool220 on Oct 8, 2008 12:47 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

disagree...

…night and day games have nothing to do with it.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Oct 8, 2008 12:48 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Don't you think there is a difference in the people

that can attend night games and the people that can attend day games?

Hey, it's a new century!

by cowsarecool220 on Oct 8, 2008 12:50 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It's fair

see my 2 comments above…

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Oct 8, 2008 12:48 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

But don't you think there is a difference in the people

that can attend night games and the people that can attend day games?

I think it’s two different types of crowds and not just the time of day and IS significant!

Hey, it's a new century!

by cowsarecool220 on Oct 8, 2008 12:52 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I do think the desire to drink more

and act a fool increases for night games.

I’ll go out on a limb and say a notable majority of the on-field schnanegans that goes on at Wrigley happens at night games. And night games account for just over half the day games over the past several seasons.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Oct 8, 2008 12:59 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I believe the Cubs have a maximum of 30 night games per year.

That still leaves 51 day games, an overwhelming majority of the games.

Hey, it's a new century!

by cowsarecool220 on Oct 8, 2008 2:01 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah, I totally turned that around

Night games started out at 18 per season and only recently went to 22, 26 and now 30.

My point I was trying to make before I F’d it up was there are far more day games but the “incidences” occur mainly at night games.

Thanks for catching that.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Oct 8, 2008 3:15 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Actually, a big criticism of Red Sox fans these days

are that they aren’t focused on the game and are at the game just to be seen.

I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg

by Trey2317 on Oct 8, 2008 12:59 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Maybe since the 2004 & 2007 successes that's true

I haven’t been to Fenway for quite a few years now.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Oct 8, 2008 1:00 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah, it's been a developing trend

Prior to 2004, the crowds were into the game, but were very similar to Cubs’ fans in terms of being in the game. However, once the Sox started letting people go outside Fenway during games (they own the sidewalks) in 2003 or 2004, the fans starting changing a bit.

These days, with the Sox being trendy, there has been a lot of criticism of the ‘new’ Sox fan.

I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg

by Trey2317 on Oct 8, 2008 1:12 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

outside the outer walls?

Even the Monster? Wow…!

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Oct 8, 2008 1:15 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don't think they bought the land behind the Monster

or behind right field, for that matter.

But what they did was to basically do what the Cubs have wanted for years – they bought up land around Fenway and closed Landsdowne Street (the one with all the entrance gates) to just ticketed fans only. Then they put up team-controlled vendors on the street and let patrons come and go as they please throughout the game.

It’s been an enormous success for the Red Sox, but you could make the argument that the amenities have caused their fans to soften a bit, too.

I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg

by Trey2317 on Oct 8, 2008 1:20 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Landsdowne Street is behind the Monster

Yawkey Way is the one with the gates.

It’s an interesting idea, but I never heard anything about the Cubs wanting to try it – and how would that work, anyway? The Red Sox could close Yawkey Way because it’s a side street, but Addison and Clark are major thoroughfares.

"I see great things in baseball. It's our game - the American game." - Walt Whitman

by hip2bsquare on Oct 8, 2008 1:34 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I heard it discussed about Waveland and Sheffied only

but not Clark and Addison (at least to the effect of what’s done in beantown). You’d have to wonder how closing Waveland affects the fire dept.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Oct 8, 2008 1:50 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah, I'm a moron

the minute I hit post, I knew the street was wrong.

With the Red Sox, it’s a temporary setup, IIRC (I haven’t been to a Sox game in a couple years). In theory, traffic could be diverted off of Clark and/or Addison, with the Cubs controlling who goes in and out of the area.

I think it would be more likely that Sheffield and Waveland could be closed to traffic and the streets being closed to non-ticketed passengers (which would mean sorry ballhawks).

Of course, for any of this to work, the concourses would have to revamped so that there was only 1 or 2 entrances into Wrigley. It’d be a difficult project, but one (along with the buildings the team would like to buy) that potentially holds a large profit.

I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg

by Trey2317 on Oct 8, 2008 1:55 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It'd be hard to close those streets...

… because people who live there couldn’t get to their residences (particularly on Kenmore).

They do close the streets to traffic. That’s probably all they’ll ever do.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Oct 8, 2008 3:49 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah, I was thinking about that

Unless the Cubs buy up the homes in the surrounding area, shutting it down won’t happen, except as it does now.

I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg

by Trey2317 on Oct 8, 2008 3:50 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Second year in a row there has been some dumb thing before game 1 of the NLDS.

This year the blessing, last year the sicko who hung the skinned goat from the Harry statue. Everyone has to stop this BS and focus on the play on the field.

by AndHart120 on Oct 8, 2008 10:16 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Dump the stupid sign

Make a huge deal out of the division championships. I’m talking a huge sign, honor our success.

Your 2008 Missouri Tigers! #2/3 5-0 (1-0). Next up Okie State at home. Live on ESPN in primetime for the second week in a row. Chase Daniel and Jeremy Maclin for Co-Heisman!

by nji232 on Oct 8, 2008 10:17 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Quick question to those in the know

When was the sign in question put up?

One day I hope to come up with something worthy of this space.

by chilango2 on Oct 8, 2008 10:33 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It's been up for at least ten years...

… perhaps more. I can’t remember the first time I saw it, but at least that long.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Oct 8, 2008 10:36 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Thank you Al

With this in mind, I say take it down. It’s not a deeply-rooted tradition or something that has a lot of sentimental value to the fanbase, so it only perpetuates a stereotype.

One day I hope to come up with something worthy of this space.

by chilango2 on Oct 8, 2008 10:45 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

LEAVE IT!!

Just think of how glorious it will actually feel when we see all 0’s on the AC sign.

by TheRiot2 on Oct 8, 2008 10:34 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Meh... this really isn't something I feel strongly about...

I’ve never really thought about the L flag or the AC sign as grand symbols of failure. They’re just quirky little things. Take them down. Leave them up. Whatever.

I do miss the Torco sign though.

by hokie316 on Oct 8, 2008 10:35 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Miller Lite did a pretty good job

with new stuff every homestand on that sign

"There is not a better offense in America. Missouri has had 48 possessions and scored on 33 of them. The nation's No. 1 scoring offense has punted just five times and has yet to go three-and-out." Tom Dienhart, Rivals.com

by PurpleLineToWrigley on Oct 8, 2008 12:52 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Their best one was back some time

(someone help me here please), the Cards were in town and they just didn’t have the pitching to contend. Wasn’t this year, could be last year.

The Miller Lite sign read: “Hey Cards, thirsty for a pitcher?”

My 2nd best was when the evil empire was here in 2003. The sign read: “$160 million can buy a lot of beer”

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Oct 8, 2008 1:08 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

W & L Flags

Wrigley Field is an old ballpark with many different items showing that. Some are necessary and some are left as tradition. The W & L flags (in case anyone does not know) were originally hung so that commuters on the train could see if the Cubs won or lost that day. We are obviously in a more modern time with much more information at our finger tips. I think it is a pretty cool tradition that should not change. I do not think it is a reminder of the Cubs horrible futility.

by gocubsgo22 on Oct 8, 2008 10:49 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Exactly, the W and L flags are part of the Wrigley tradition.

The sign Al is referring to is relatively new.

Hey, it's a new century!

by cowsarecool220 on Oct 8, 2008 12:49 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I honestly want a whole new stadium

i want a baseball park, not a tourist attraction. Haven’t won anything in the stadium, nothing but bad things have happened there. Make a modern park, there is no tradition. Only failure has occured in the park. ever since 2003 tickets have become outrageous. I know it will never happen, and I know I am probably one of the only people who want this

Dinosaurs? "Didn't exist. You can't say there were dinosaurs when you never saw them." -Carl Everett

by NDcubsfan on Oct 8, 2008 10:54 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You're not the only one.

+1

Things most folks like about Wrigley but I couldn’t care less if they were jettisoned.

1. The AC sign. Realize that it’s not part of Wrigley, but how about I put up a sign in the kitchen that said “Year of My Wife’s Good Cooking” in Latin, with a counter of the days since she served up a good meal? Or her putting up a sign in the bedroom…? (fill in the blanks).

2. The inexorable linkage between Harry Carray and the Cubs. Come on. I liked the guy—really. But by the time he got to Wrigley he was far past his prime and he wasn’t here for THAT long. Harry glasses, caricatures, signs must go. Not too fond of the statue either.

3. Ron Santo. Again—I like the guy, but he’s got almost zero color skills and his prep work is even worse. Please, WGN, go the professional route and get rid of Ronnie’s babbling, whining, complaining, and yelling. Bring him in every now and then, and celebrate when he finally makes the HOF, but stop subjecting listeners to him for 140 games per year. He’s becoming pathetic.

4. Fans standing and screaming when there’s two strikes on the batter.

5. “Go Cubs Go”. Ugh. Screams “Amateur Night”

6. The ivy (ducks flying objects). I love how it looks, especially on a sunny afternoon in early summer. But a brick outfield wall covered by plant life ain’t the safest for an outfielder.

7. The “We’re too cool for towel waving during the playoffs”. I can see the “No Wave” tradition, but the “Cubs Chop” in 2003 was pretty darn fun for the fans and I think a bit motivational for the players.

8. Throwing HRs back. Dumb.

McCain / Palin: The POW / WOW! Ticket

by Goat Whisperer on Oct 8, 2008 11:52 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

doesn't make sense

I can’t throw a hr ball back or sing “go cubs go,” but I should wave a white towel over my head repeatedly?

by TC Cubby on Oct 8, 2008 12:08 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'd go with blue

To match my eyes.

McCain / Palin: The POW / WOW! Ticket

by Goat Whisperer on Oct 8, 2008 12:11 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Blue would definitely be better

than waving a white flag towel of surrender. But I’m still too cool to do it. However, it ‘s nice to see that someone out there agrees with me that Go Cubs Go is lame and that Harry is overrated(as far as his time with the Cubs is concerned-I don’t know about his time before that.). I never really could warm up to him since he had previously announced for two of our biggest rivals. The throwing HRs back was cute at first. Now it’s just silly. See your point about Ronnie. He is very hard to listen to when we are losing. But I do still love him.

by katie casey on Oct 8, 2008 12:33 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Some of these are bold

1. You’re wife should appreciate that. But the sign is not signalling domestic issue.
2. Harry was an attraction. People knew that. He wasn’t brought in for his excellent game-calling skills, he was brought in as a marketing idea.
3. Ronnie is not there for color, he’s a cheerleader, period. No ex-ballplayer wears his heart on his sleeve more than Ronnie.
4. That’s done in many places also. It’s a sign of potential joy if that last strike as achieved.
5. I don’t like the song that much but it’s better than sausage/president races or a stupid bird at PNC or that thing at US Commiscular. Those are far more egregious than “go cubs go”.
6. Go see Bill Veeck. Plus that’s protected by Landmark status.
7. Waaaay over-used. It was cool with the Steelers in the 70’s and a few times afterwards. Now it’s waaaay over-drawn just like that f—-ing Johnny Glitter song.
8. Wrigley tradition, won’t change.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Oct 8, 2008 12:31 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Reminds me of a bad joke...

“Pedophile? That’s a pretty big word for a 12-year old.”

by hokie316 on Oct 8, 2008 12:59 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah, probably Gary Glitter

It’s the most nauseating song in all of sports arenas.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Oct 8, 2008 1:01 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

When your wikipedia summary looks like this, it's time for some self-reflection

1.5 Career moves after 2000 jail release
2 Personal life
2.1 Early life
2.2 Child pornography arrest and conviction
2.3 Vietnam underage-sex arrest and conviction
2.3.1 Arrest and trial
2.3.2 Appeal
2.3.3 Cardiovascular disorder
2.3.4 Release
2.4 Plans after prison release

by TC Cubby on Oct 8, 2008 1:05 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

And yet one cannot swing a dead cat

without hitting an arena playing that PoS song!

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Oct 8, 2008 1:10 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That song

was a classic until it was ruined by sports.

Hockey, mostly.

The same fate could happen to Bltizkrieg Bop.

My next sig line quote will also be from Lou Piniella, and the first word will be either "Look", or "Listen", followed by a comma.

by JohnM on Oct 8, 2008 2:02 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Stop playing the chorus only in sports stadiums!

My next sig line quote will also be from Lou Piniella, and the first word will be either "Look", or "Listen", followed by a comma.

by JohnM on Oct 8, 2008 2:04 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The Blitzkreig Bop

Is about Nazis and shooting people in the back. If stadium operators actually read the lyrics, would they continue to play the song? Probably not.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Oct 8, 2008 2:08 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Whole other set of issues there . . .

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Oct 8, 2008 2:09 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It's about teenagers dancing, not Nazis

(although the band had a juvenile fascination with Nazis that came through on a couple of other songs.)

My next sig line quote will also be from Lou Piniella, and the first word will be either "Look", or "Listen", followed by a comma.

by JohnM on Oct 8, 2008 2:19 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I stand corrected, then

Although the shootem in the back bit is repeated over and over in the song.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Oct 8, 2008 2:22 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Actually NBA

with that Casio keyboard, sound maker. Same crappy stuff played DURING the game at every arena. It’s like Stern got a deal on 30 of these along with a Karaoke machine.

Hockey has followed but that’s because their commish is an NBA-reject.

As for that “Bop” song, I can’t even remember hearing that.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Oct 8, 2008 2:15 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

"Hey ho, Let's Go"

That’s the chant from the “bop” song.

And you’re right about basketball…I remember that now.

My next sig line quote will also be from Lou Piniella, and the first word will be either "Look", or "Listen", followed by a comma.

by JohnM on Oct 8, 2008 2:21 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

OK, that stupid "go phone" used it too

Never connected those with the real lyrics….eeesh.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Oct 8, 2008 3:17 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

My humble takes

1. Obviously I agree
2. Agree
3. Agree
4. Mainly agree. Sometimes it’s appropriate, but it happens in the third inning with one out. Makes us look like a bunch of fans that have never won any game at all.
5. It’s cheesy, but I like it. My Cub disease started in 1982, and the song is from 1984. Better than the disco that they used to play when the Cubs won.
6. Not the safest, but everyone knows it’s there. It’s 72 years old — more a tradition than that artificial “retro” hill in Houston.
7. Agree, agree, agree
8. Even more agree — a lame tradition that no longer is a “swipe at the enemy”. It’s just giving up a sovenier and it is mindless mob mentatlity. My brother in law got screamed at for not doing it right away this year…how stupid.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Oct 8, 2008 1:49 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I Will Hear No Shit Talking The Alan Parsons Instrumental

played during team intros. Not their best tune (“Games People Play”) but it’s still the APP!

Never, but NEVER, put ketchup on a hot dog.

by CaliCub on Oct 8, 2008 10:10 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Um, ok (?)

Thanks for that non-sequiteur

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Oct 9, 2008 8:27 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Pressure – We all deal with in our day to day lives. Readers of this board come from every walk of life and are probably in every earnings level, that to me is what is great about being a cub fan you never who your going to meet but we have one huge thing in common

To me that sign reresent a long struggle, but when you see 40,000 plus at ever game it also points to loyality and brotherhood.

AC000000 the real magic number

I've been bleeding double blue Cubbies & NY Rangers

by parrotinct on Oct 8, 2008 10:57 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

This is so stupid!

Look at all the BTU’s burned on this topic. Why? Because someone doesn’t have a warm-fuzzy because of it? Because someone is offended because of it? This is the same BS politically correct crock of s—- I heard about the dreaded “L” flag.

Too f—-ing bad. It has absolutely nothing to do with the Cubs play on the field.

If people really want to end the bad atmosphere associated with the Cubs, move the hell out of WRIGLEYVILLE. Build a quirky ballpark with lots of fan amenities, skyboxes galore, high end audio system and neon/video stuff everywhere. Then everyone can have the Chase Field / US Commiscular / Miller Park sensory overload type of feel between every pitch, no views of the lake, no neighborhood feel and best of yet no politically incorrect Anno Catuli signs or “L” flags.

And on top of it all we’re all guilty (those of the 3.3M+ that went through the turnstyles) of feeding that monster. And guess what, I’m going to be guilty again when I drop over $20k on season tickets for 2009.

The bottom line is a good ball club wins titles, not the absense of “L” flags, the “AC” sign or some dumb-ass publicity stunt blessing the dugout before playoffs.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Oct 8, 2008 11:00 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That's exactly my point.

The focus has been on the wrong things — the AC sign being one of them. Let’s put the focus back on the field.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Oct 8, 2008 11:11 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Then why the title as written?

Getting rid of that sign will not affect the team [in a positive manner].

Getting a leadoff hitter will, getting a stud starting pitcher that is healthy will, improving SS will. Getting rid of the Anno Catuli sign WILL NOT.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Oct 8, 2008 12:33 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yes, it will.

Because having stuff like that TAKES THE FOCUS OFF THE FIELD.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Oct 8, 2008 3:50 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Keep it

The sign is a stat. You don’t take a guys batting average off the scoreboard because he is hitting .200 The cubs futility is what it is. How about this… Instead of removing the sign the Cubs win a championship.

by JonH on Oct 8, 2008 11:00 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You think they'll remove the sign after a championship? They won't...

it will reset to AC000000 and the whole thing will start over again. If it ever gets reset…by the time it reads AC050505 everyone will be even more nervous about it.

As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.

by santoswoodenlegs on Oct 8, 2008 11:25 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

+1

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Oct 8, 2008 12:43 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'd never thought about it

But the ‘AC’ sign does seem to celebrate mediocrity. Yes, it’s nice when the division numbers are at 00, but let’s be honest – whether or not the Cubs win, we’ll all know the years associated with the sign, so there’s not much point to it except for getting newcomers to Wrigley to look at the Lakeview Baseball Club’s properties (which seems self-serving).

I don’t recall any other teams keeping a running tab of their failures (unless you count different-colored pennants that the Red Sox have), which the ‘AC’ sign seems to be.

I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg

by Trey2317 on Oct 8, 2008 11:26 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Futility, not mediocrity

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Oct 8, 2008 1:51 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Sometimes both?

I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg

by Trey2317 on Oct 8, 2008 1:56 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I suppose you could argue that with the recent resurgence

Of competitive Cub baseball.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Oct 8, 2008 1:58 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Maybe

I agree, though, it definitely celebrates the futility of a team that has fielded mediocre teams a time or two.

I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg

by Trey2317 on Oct 8, 2008 2:07 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Was wondering how long it'd take for someone to notice that.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Oct 8, 2008 3:50 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Al, I see your point on the AC sign

but if you take it down, you still have indicators WITHIN the walls that remind you of post season futility. No WS Flags. Most other ballparks, albeit newer ones, display their Pennants and WS Championships. The press reminds everyone on a daily basis of our futility, a sign surely couldn’t matter. And I don’t mean for the Cubs to go out and run up a 1945 NL Pennant flag, either.

I agree that sending the priest with the holy water in the dugout was in poor judgment.

"WGN, Channel 9 Cubs Baseball, Excitingly, Importantly, Dramatically Yours." - Jack Brickhouse

by BigJohnAZ on Oct 8, 2008 11:38 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

None of those are as in your face as the AC sign...

The AC sign advertises long-term failure. The current players on the field had nothing to do with the failures from year 0 through year 90. So why throw the burden on them. Nothing can be done about the past, so why bring it up.

Besides, the Latin is wrong. As I recall, it really says something along the line of “Let’s go baby cats.” Lets go Cubs would be something like Ursuli.

As for the W/L flags, if you take away the L flag, you have to take away the W flag too. Why? Well, if the Cubs win, they will fly the W flag. But if they lose, they will fly no flag? Then people will still know the Cubs lost. And god forbid people know the outcome of the day.

In the middle of a good time, Truth gave me her icy kiss. Look around, you must be joking. All that way, all that way for this? -Oysterband

by Ross on Oct 8, 2008 11:42 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I love the W and L flags

that’s ONE part of Wrigley I hope stays as long as the field is there.

Ok, maybe the AC sign is in your face every day. Fine take away the sign. But the real problem is the sportswriters and FOX/TBS that talk about it ad nauseum. If you can shut them up, then the sign can go. Plus, for the Cubs players, I’ll bet they don’t even pay any attention to the sign. It’s like something you see every day, it blends into everything else. Yes, it’s still there, but the effect has been lost over time, IMHO.

"WGN, Channel 9 Cubs Baseball, Excitingly, Importantly, Dramatically Yours." - Jack Brickhouse

by BigJohnAZ on Oct 8, 2008 11:48 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I got it...

We’ll dump the L flag, but we’ll do two other ones:
OTR will mean on the road.
NGT will mean no game today.

This way, people won’t get confused during long road trips by thinking the Cubs lost every single day just because they didn’t see a flag.

(please note, for those confused, this is sarcasm)

In the middle of a good time, Truth gave me her icy kiss. Look around, you must be joking. All that way, all that way for this? -Oysterband

by Ross on Oct 8, 2008 12:22 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Nothing advertises long-term failure

more than the record book.

This whole idea of “can’t have anything negative and everyone has to be Brady Bunch happy” is what is wrong with today’s society. It’s why little leagues hand out 14th place trophies, every single kid makes a team and everyone is entitled to home ownership, whether or not they’re financially qualified or not.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Oct 8, 2008 12:35 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The let's go part

is the “Eamus Catuli!” part

AC0063101 is Anno Catuli or “year of the cub” and the number of years since the division, pennant and WS titles.

So here’s one. There’s all this agnst about the AC sign, wanna make them take down the Eamus Catuli! also? If you do, you’re violating 1st amendment rights, if you don’t you’re hypocrit.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Oct 8, 2008 12:41 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Agreed.

Not even close.

Lots of people, not just bh24, want to cry, “1st Amendment” when someone disagrees. It’s only a First Amendment issue if the government MAKES them take it down.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Oct 8, 2008 1:59 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

THANK YOU!
  1. pet peeve not related to the Cubs: People who don’t understand the First Amendment!

Quick primer:

If someone puts something on TV, the radio, on a billboard or in print that you disagree with and you choose to protest and boycott, or encourage others to do the same, you are not violating the First Amendment.

You are EXERCISING your First Amendment rights.

If Bill O’Reilly (Or Keith Olbermann) says something you disagree with ,and you organize a boycott of one of their sponsors, that is a perfectly reasonable, legal and acceptable method of protest.

The First Amendment guarantees you the right to say what you want. It does not guarantee you the right to a megaphone.

The worst beer I had was pretty good.

by Worf on Oct 8, 2008 2:08 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

And that's what the Lakeview Club is doing

aren’t they? They have two signs. One sort of says “Go Cubs”, the other says they won a certain title this long ago.

I just do not understand why this is such an issue for some.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Oct 8, 2008 2:18 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

And some of us are saying we don't like it

We are exercising our First Amendment rights. The particluar comment to which you’re responding came about because you said we were VIOLATING the First Amendment.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Oct 8, 2008 2:19 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I suppose the Cubs...

Could build something high enough to where you couldn’t see the sign from the stadium…

The worst beer I had was pretty good.

by Worf on Oct 8, 2008 3:19 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Got it, thanks

That is more than fine for you to do, I misinterpreted a few comments when trying to read too quickly.

I’ll still keep on my stand though that the sign is the least of the Cubs problems.

I would love to see some big acquistions and trades by the conclusion of the Winter meetings.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Oct 8, 2008 3:19 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I agree whole-heartedly with your last sentence

I also agree that ithis stuff isn’t the cause of the problems . . . I do think it detracts from the baseball side of it.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Oct 8, 2008 4:43 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Well, I certainly wouldn't be weeping in my Wheaties...

…if they tore down the AC sign. I’d take an RPG to it myself if given the OK by city officials. (Can tuckpointing fix that?)

Changing the subject just a bit, do you know what else I think the Cubs should stop doing? HOLDING THOSE PRE-PLAYOFF FAN RALLYS. For two years in a row now I’ve gone to the damn thing and for two years in a row I’ve found myself slumped over in a pool of my own shame and disappointment just a few days later.

Looking back now, GRod’s long-winded speech and Jim Belushi’s shameless self-promotion don’t seem so funny anymore. And DLee’s 10-second “motIvational speech” seems an appropriate duration given how long the Cubs lasted in the postseason. I think I’m going to burn my free “W” towel.

To sum up: BLOW UP THE SIGN AND SCREW THE RALLY!

So this is how it ends.

by dat cubfan daver on Oct 8, 2008 11:39 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Oooohhhh.

An idea. How about a “Rally Screw?”

I’ll let you define it.

But the wind blew me back via Chicago, In the middle of the night

by N Oakley on Oct 8, 2008 1:20 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Hey, if that's what it would've taken to get the Cubs to score some runs in the playoffs...

…I would have gladly accepted the public indecency charges. Not sure how my wife would’ve felt about it, though.

So this is how it ends.

by dat cubfan daver on Oct 8, 2008 1:57 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Hmmm.

If my wife only sort of follows baseball, could I still sell it?

But the wind blew me back via Chicago, In the middle of the night

by N Oakley on Oct 8, 2008 2:45 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Worth a shot, if only to see if it works

And even if it doesn’t, I’d probably be happy anyway ;)

"I see great things in baseball. It's our game - the American game." - Walt Whitman

by hip2bsquare on Oct 8, 2008 2:02 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

My wife is a Brewers fan...

If I told her it was for the Brewers, is that like… immoral?

The worst beer I had was pretty good.

by Worf on Oct 8, 2008 2:04 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

There will be nothing left to tuckpoint

after an RPG.

It’s like a Dirty Harry quote: “…this is the 44 magnum, holds a 300-grain cartridge, and if properly used, it can remove the finger prints.”

Keep the sign and screw the rally (monkey)…to start defining it as N Oakley suggests.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Oct 8, 2008 1:29 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The fan rallies are mandated by MLB.

So complain to Bud Selig’s office about them, not the Cubs. They have nothing to do with them.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Oct 8, 2008 3:52 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

If you want the sign gone how about also removing

the so-called “Bartman” seat (113) too. You know, the one where all the tourists flock before the game and which celebrates a certain mythology about a crushing Cubs defeat?

Let’s get rid of everything that reminds us of the painful past!

by JFCubFan on Oct 8, 2008 11:42 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Well, it's not the seat's fault that Bartman happened to be sitting in it.

The sign’s sole purpose is draw attention to how long it’s been since the Cubs have won a championship.

So this is how it ends.

by dat cubfan daver on Oct 8, 2008 11:45 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It's not the seat's fault

some dumb-ass was sitting in it that night that couldn’t keep his hands to himself.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Oct 8, 2008 12:49 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It's also not the seat's fault

That some overrated punk of a piss-handed outfielder behaved like a petulant child on a ball his stone hands had no hope of catching anyway.

Or that some wusspunk vaginal orifice of a pitcher melted down. Or some fat, toothpick chewing manager sat there like a moron watching it all happen. Or an idiot shortstop committed an inexcusable error.

Man, that felt good.

The worst beer I had was pretty good.

by Worf on Oct 8, 2008 2:01 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It's also not the seat's fault

That a 2-bit, National Enquire-type rag that bills itself as a world-class newspaper printed the fan’s name, address and workplace info, seeing as he was a fan who did what 90% of fans would do and not a paid partiicipant. Or that said rag paid the most reviled sports columnist in Chicago history to keep writing about it years later.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Oct 8, 2008 2:06 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Absolutely...

Although I wonder… is Mariotti really more reviled than Bayless and Lincicome?

Discuss!

The worst beer I had was pretty good.

by Worf on Oct 8, 2008 2:09 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Oh, I think so

I actually liked Lincicome. Bayless changed opinion with the wind direction.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Oct 8, 2008 2:10 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

disagree on the no hope of catching

But let’s just say he didn’t catch it and there was no one to deflect the ball. No hissy fit as you put it, no pitcher meltdown. You gotta tell us how you came up with “wusspunk vaginal orifice”.

Is Rothschild related to Dusty some how? Because he sat on his ass (though no toothpick) and watched Demp walk 7 the other day.

Now, let’s say “piss-handed” (like that one) caught it. 2 outs… and maybe, just maybe the “idiot” SS (playing back instead of at DP depth) handles a simple grounder and walla….3 outs. Guess we’ll never know. Of course he could of still done a DeRo/Lee/Rami/Riot stunt from Thur night.

I still wish EVERYONE scattered like the BoSox fans did just three days earlier at Fenway when Trot Nixon grabbed Jeter’s long fly ball.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Oct 8, 2008 2:23 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

+1 on the BoSox fans

I’ll never forget seeing that, and telling my friend that Cubs fans would probably try to catch the ball.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Oct 8, 2008 2:24 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That was Saturday

Game 6 here was the following Tuesday…how ironic you mentioned that to your friend.

Now just imagine Alou does catch it. Two outs. IF’ers drop back to normal depth (instead of DP depth). Things could have been different.

I can handle – although still with anger – the defence failing in game 2 the other day. But it was the CUBS that failed, not an outside influence. It’s bad enough the team F’s it up every year, they don’t need any additional help, IMHO.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Oct 8, 2008 2:40 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

True, but....

If Moises walks back to his position, Prior thinks, “Ok, gotta get the batter.”

Do they lose anyway, if he keeps his composure? Maybe – but life is less about what happens to you and more how you respond to it.

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson

by Shanghai Badger on Oct 8, 2008 2:46 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yes...no question IMO. If Alou walks back and makes nothing of it...

…no one would ever even remember that play.

Alou’s over-reaction and then Dusty sitting on his hands when he should have walked out the mound to calm down the situation was the reason for the collapse, it had nothing to do with that fan…

"When I got to Chicago, fans came to Wrigley Field just to have fun, now they come to see us win. The expectations have changed, for the players and for the fans. It’s about winning." Kerry Wood, 7/14/08

by JB 23 on Oct 8, 2008 8:25 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Alou

Has gone back and forth. I’ve watched that play more times than I care to remember and I just don’t see it happening for Moises.

It’s also possible that Prior melts down with two outs in the 8th as easily as one out. The man has the mental toughness of a Care Bear

The worst beer I had was pretty good.

by Worf on Oct 8, 2008 3:16 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

and shoulder toughness too

I for one see Alou getting it. The still frame pics I saw have his glove less than a foot away from the kids’ hands just as the ball had bounded off.

Now if we’re talking Sammy down the other line, that’s almost never going to happen.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Oct 8, 2008 3:22 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

This is another thing we have to let go.

Man, you guys are analyzing that play like the Zapruder film.

It happened. It’s over. Let it go.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Oct 8, 2008 3:53 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

He did lean back and to the left

after Moises starting screaming at him…

I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg

by Trey2317 on Oct 8, 2008 3:54 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'm looking forward

To some baseball distraction for awhile. I guess I never felt it before, but winter does kind of provide a refresher for the spring.

by StevenABQ on Oct 8, 2008 11:43 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

For you and many others, yes it does

For me the intensity goes up 10 fold when the puck drops on the ’Hawks season Friday and MSG.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Oct 8, 2008 2:41 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Thats awesome

My wife really enjoys Hockey, I just never really got into it, maybe its time to start.

by StevenABQ on Oct 8, 2008 5:14 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

couple thoughts

This sort of reminds of when people want to get rid of a grading system in school. Heaven forbid some poor kid might develop low self esteem because their grades are lousy. So what if the kid is lazy or didn’t try or just isn’t as capable a student. Poor baby might feel bad. Why be held accountable for your actions? But when the bad student gets an A++++ wouldn’t it be time to celebrate. I’d like to see the AC000000.

To be honest I can’t see how taking it down would really matter. Do the players or management even know what it is? Or care? And if they do, couldn’t it have a reverse effect? Wouldn’t it be like a wake up call that they should try harder? Like how when you see a high number on the scale and decide it’s time to go on a diet. Adding that extra digit to the sign might be that wake up call.

As for the W and L flags…if you get rid of the L, then you should get rid of the W. And that is a tradition I would truly miss.

by katie casey on Oct 8, 2008 11:52 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The point

Which I guess we’ll all driven into the ground, is that it promotes the same old Cubs futility crap that we are inundated with all season. Its bad enough to have ESPN, FOX, and TBS all pouncing on stories of curses, faliure, etc. But its worse when its literally in our back yard. As AL mentioned, the Lakeview BBC probably could careless if there was a call to remove it, but it doesn’t change that its a dumb reminder. To me its no different than the tons of so-called Cubs fans that just “dont get it”. The same ones that latch on to the recycled stories of curses, lovable losers, bartman…

by StevenABQ on Oct 8, 2008 11:59 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

+1 !!!

The kid/grade analogy is exactly why things are so out of control in society today.

The absolutely worst case example of our failing education system (thanks to teacher unions) is no child left behind.

I’m going to be on the board of my kids softball league next season. The first order of business for the older age groups is to rid ourselves of the “participation trophy”. I will present it in terms of operating costs first followed then by the competitive nature of sports. My kids team finished dead last in a 12-team division a few seasons ago and I just could not understand the thinking of people. What gives a kid motivation to improve if their coddled all the time and told “everything will be OK”. They’ll never know how to handle jack-shit in the real world.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Oct 8, 2008 3:26 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Well I know Lou doesnt know about the AC sign

He didnt even realize the flags on top of the scoreboard were the standings til last year! lol

by AndHart120 on Oct 8, 2008 12:09 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

And if you're going to remove it...

don’t make some dumbass ceremony out of it. Toss it quietly, in the dark of night.

-OR-

turn it into a sign that lists the number of all time Cubs victories.

by DaveinHouston on Oct 8, 2008 12:09 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Or throw it in the street

and ask Daley to have someone bulldoze it.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Oct 8, 2008 1:48 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'd be interested

in knowing whether those for or against the sign attend Wrigley regularly. I suppose the sign doesn’t bother me, in part, because the only time I see it is on tv—maybe I’d feel differently if I saw it every game.

by TC Cubby on Oct 8, 2008 12:13 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Put these numbers on the building instead of the AC ones...

06 07 08 10 18 29 32 35
38 45 84 89 98 03 07 08

Thats more positive

by AndHart120 on Oct 8, 2008 12:13 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That should be the team's responsibility

not that of an individual or at most separate business entity.

This whole thing of silencing someone of dissenting opinion is what makes today’s society reek of no personal responsibility.

Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.

by blackhawk24 on Oct 8, 2008 12:38 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

TEAR WRIGLEY AND THE AC SIGN DOWN!!!!

How degrading of a fan you can be to say “Hey we’ve sucked the last 100 years” and post it. I like many Cubs fans maybe one (or two My brother) living in San Antonio we were pissed at our