2008 Cubs Regular Season TEAM Review
by DGU on Oct 9, 2008 11:09 AM CDT
3 comments
Balanced is the word that best describes the 2008 Cubs.
The 2008 Cubs won 97 games, with winning records in every division (except interleague). They scored more runs than anyone in the National League, 56 more than the next best teams. Only the Texas Rangers scored more runs in all baseball. Similarly, they were second best in runs allowed (second to the Dodgers of all teams) in the NL, tied for second in all of the majors. This was a good team on both sides of the ball, the best team many of us have ever seen.
Breaking down the numbers a little more...
The Cubs were one of four NL teams to have winning records on the road.
They went 24-22 in 1 run games.
Their batting splits are astounding in how flat they are. The Cubs hit .274/.350/.443 v. RHP and .288/.366/.442 v. LHP. There was little difference between their splits in the first and second halves, little difference between hitting with runners in scoring position or no one on, between fly ball pitchers and ground ball pitchers. The only significant split was the Cubs' showing v. power pitchers, where they took nearly a .100 pt OPS hit.
Their pitching splits show a lot of the same stability. At home and away, first and second half, day or night - it was the same Cub team. There was a significant split in the Cubs pitchers v. RHB and LHB, to be expected when 4/5 of your starters are RH and Carmen Pignatellio set the storyline for LH relief on day one.
Looking at that review, the Cubs obviously are going to want to dig deeper into individual numbers, but it seems like there is only one glaring place the Cubs MUST improve in terms of regular season performance. The Cubs are going to want to have at least 2 viable left-handed relievers who can get left-handed batters out.
What about a left-handed bat? The Cubs have been seeking a left-handed slugger since Jeromy Burnitz. But do they really need one? Before you say, "No," reflect that Jim Edmonds was a pretty big left-handed slugger in these 2008 numbers, and he's not likely to give that performance again. That said, the Cubs may have to watch about going too far in acquiring left-handedness.
What about, finally, the difference between this team's performance in the regular sesaon and the post-season? The Cubs played well all season long against the better teams. The one split that stands out is their performance against AL teams, who really bullied our pitchers. Also, throughout the regular season, the Cubs hitters did fine in "Clutch" situations like tie games and late in close games.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
3 recs |
3 comments
Email
Print
Comments
Forgot - I wanted to add this detail
Of all the non-pitcher lineup spots for the 2008 Cubs, the lowest OBP, as I jokingly predicted preseason, was at the leadoff position. Even our 8th batter managed a .359 OBP, compared to the leadoff batter’s .342 and the 2-hole hitter’s .352.
Part of that is Soriano, but part of it, also, is on Lou’s lineup construction, which buried DeRosa in his career year and had Reed Johnson leading off against RHP despite a legendary inability to suceed in that role.
The highest SLG came from the #7 hitter and the worst overall OPS was from the #2 hitter – another indictment of Lou’s lineup construction.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Oct 9, 2008 11:38 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I loved for "No"...
but it wasn’t bad “luck”… they just played poorly at the wrong time.
I haz blurg: hotbeans.wordpress.com
by digitalbenjamin on Oct 9, 2008 3:14 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah - that's putting it better than I did.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Oct 9, 2008 3:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Recommended FanPosts
Recent FanPosts
Cubs By The Numbers
Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.
Click here to order your copy, available now!
Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
