The Big Cub Unit?
As reported today on the Cubs website and also by Paul Sullivan in the Tribune, the Cubs are one of six teams to have contacted Randy Johnson's agent expressing interest in signing The Big Unit to a one-year deal.
photo via www.chrisoleary.com
Well.
I dunno. Clearly, as last year, the Cubs are being built to "win now". But does that mean the 45-year-old, 21-year major league veteran is the answer? If the Cubs sign him, does that mean they are giving up on re-signing Ryan Dempster? (I hope not.)
Johnson did have a fine second half (5-3, 2.41 in 13 starts; in 86 innings he walked only 16 while striking out 78) for the Diamondbacks. But again, he is 45 years old; this sort of smacks of the continuing David Wells comebacks, which finally fizzled out in 2007. Johnson's back problems also worry me; if the Cubs do wind up signing him, any deal has to be heavily incentive-based (on number of starts). If he did make all his starts, maybe he does have one more year left in him. If not, you thank him and let him go. Am I advocating this? Not really -- I think there are other, better options. But neither am I slamming the door shut (although I did say "no" the other day when asked this very question in this FanPost). Reasonable minds can be changed. I'm willing to listen, at least.
Having a pitcher of this stature get his 300th win -- he needs only five -- in a uniform so foreign to his career (he is 13-0 lifetime vs. the Cubs, the only franchise he has never lost to, and that includes all five he has played for), would be unprecedented in major league history. Gaylord Perry is probably the only true itinerant who has 300+ wins, finally registering his 300th victory in 1982 as a member of the same Mariners for which Johnson first gained fame, and also remember he played under Lou Piniella for five and a half seasons (from 1993 until he was dealt to Houston halfway through the 1998 season).
So my answer now is: Maybe. Johnson has significant postseason experience, 121 innings in 19 games (16 starts), although his last three postseasons, with the 2002 Diamondbacks and 2005 and 2006 Yankees, didn't turn out so well.
Finally, in one of those "who played with whom" games that's always fun, I feel compelled to point out that in Johnson's first September callup, in 1988, one of his teammates was 43-year-old Graig Nettles, who made his major league debut 41 years ago, in 1967. In fact, Nettles' last major league at-bat was as a pinch-hitter for Johnson on October 1, 1988. The Big Unit got his first major league hit at Wrigley Field in the second game of a doubleheader on September 20, 1988; he also threw his first ML CG that day, striking out 11 Cubs in a 9-1 Montreal win (for big laffs, check out the Cub lineup and pitchers that day).
So -- let's wait and see. This would be a true outside-the-box move, and if he were a Cub, at least Johnson couldn't beat them any more.
Finally, I am in Arizona soaking up the sun for a few days. I'm planning on going to Mesa to see the AFL game on Monday. If any Phoenix-area BCB readers would like to join me there, email me so we can make arrangements to meet up.
0 recs |
92 comments
|
Comments
Enjoy the warmth Al
it’s cold here in the midwest today. Scout out a new place to eat this spring too for us!
Johnson is a NO in my opinion. Not reliable, too old, too late. I would have been glad to see him in cubbie blue 10 years ago. I think it’s just more posturing to sign Dempster. Al, you were the one who said the Cubs made decades of bad moves signing players after their career was on the decline. Let’s not start now with the Dye’s and Johnson’s. Hendry has been pretty good getting the guys on an upswing beginning their prime. I hold out hope for that, not revisiting the past history of players past their prime.
This is only the beginning....Lou Pinella end of '07 season and Chicago Transit Authority (the band when they were really good).
by mrcubsfan on Nov 15, 2008 5:00 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
That was my feeling on first hearing this possibility.
Now, on Jermaine Dye, I feel confident you could get a productive year out of him. About Johnson, I’d be concerned about his back problems, which is why IF the Cubs do this, they MUST get an incentive-based deal.
If it’s posturing to get Dempster back, so be it.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Nov 15, 2008 5:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
agree with the take on johnson
I wonder why the cubs need him….with his age and injury problems, wouldnt we just be better off letting sean marshall fill a rotation spot?
by cubsmania on Nov 15, 2008 5:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Not only no...
But HELL NO…
I agree… 10 years ago I’d have jumped at the chance…
but with his history of back problems and his advanced age for a pitcher…
This would be a huge mistake…
- Over? Did you say "over"? Nothing is over until we decide it is! Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Hell no!
- Germans?
- Forget it, he's rolling.
by Endrick on Nov 15, 2008 5:20 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Typical Cubs move here
Cut ties with a good 30 year old pitcher
Try to sign a 45 year old declining pitcher
To see your idol player whom you have grown up watching be cast aside by his loyal organization can make even a grown man choke up...We'll miss you #34!
by Chanman25 on Nov 15, 2008 5:21 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
its not a typical cubs move
a typical cubs move would be signing an aging MEDIOCRE declining player to a MULTI YR deal
this would be signing an aging, declining former SUPERSTAR (who is still quite productive) to a ONE YR deal
this is EXACTLY the type of move a big market competitive team should be making
by DartmouthCubsFan on Nov 15, 2008 9:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I know, right.
One could argue that, considering their peripheral stats, Johnson could be more productive than Dempster, who everyone in the world wants Jim Hendry to resign. Bill James projects Johnson to be more productive.
by dakoose on Nov 15, 2008 10:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Johnson also has back problems
I don’t want too many health issues in the rotation…..we already have to be worried about harden. I wouldn’t want to add another health worry to our rotation.
by cubsmania on Nov 16, 2008 1:03 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Which is why you sign him to an incentive based contract.
If he doesn’t make his starts, you let him go and make a mid-season trade for someone who might not be available right now.
Or slot Sean Marshall in. Or slot another minor leaguer in who might not be on the radar screen till spring training.
With an incentive-based deal, it’s a low-risk move.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Nov 16, 2008 9:36 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Thats true but...
I think theres enough demand for randy johnson that he will get guaranteed money somewhere and is unlikely to sign an incentive based contract.
by cubsmania on Nov 16, 2008 11:11 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Really?
Guaranteed money for a 45-year-old pitcher with back problems? That’s insanity.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Nov 16, 2008 12:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Gee kind of like
Guaranteed money for 20 plus year old pitchers who could never put up a complete season as starters ?
RJ will get in the 7-10 range GUARANTEED. You want a CHEAP old guy, try Kenny Rogers, you can get him real cheap I am sure.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
by Doggie Stalker on Nov 16, 2008 1:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Big difference...
… between someone who contributed last year (Johnson) and someone who sucked last year (Rogers).
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Nov 16, 2008 4:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
No kidding
Just pointing out Randy will cost real money.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
by Doggie Stalker on Nov 17, 2008 9:53 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd rather just put Marshall in the rotation
If the Cubs are thinking that a tall lefty is what the rotation needs, save the money and just go with Marshall. Will he be better than Johnson? Honestly, I’d say it’s 50-50. But I don’t think the Big Unit is worth the risk.
I know someone said in another thread the other day that Johnson has openly stated that he’d never play for the Cubs, as his height makes it a true challenge to maneuver around in the dugout. Was that just that person’s speculation then? I thought I remember reading it as pretty absolute. Perhaps not.
by kanderber on Nov 15, 2008 5:27 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
it was blue mike
he only deals in absolutes…
the difference between saving money on Marshall is that Johnson can be a dempster replacement, so you can save money (and length in contract) by substituting Johnson for Dempster and there projections for next year are similar
by DartmouthCubsFan on Nov 15, 2008 9:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I dont think the Wells comparison is fair...
Johnson has had a better career and has never really went away, he missed time due to back surgery, but he has never sat out and waited for someone to sign him after the fact like Wells has.
And David Wells has been on nine different teams, so RJ isnt quite the Nomad.
I would be in favor of this, on a one year basis, why wouldnt you? If he gets hurt, theres no long term loss and if he performs like last year, or even close, he has a huge impact. If you could trade Marquis and resign Dempster and trot out Z, Harden, Lilly, Dempster and RJ, thats pretty intimidating and it would allow for one more year of Samardzija in the pen.
Okay, just so I understand it... in your wildest fantasy, you are in hell. And you are co-running a bed and breakfast with the devil.
by bren on Nov 15, 2008 5:36 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I agree...
Sort of. It depends on what he feels he is worth. I honestly don’t know what his current market value is? Obviously no one will give him more than one year – and as Al stated it will be heavily incentive-laden.
But I am definitely not opposed to signing him, if the price is right.
by DMCub on Nov 15, 2008 5:47 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I would NOT do this without incentives.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Nov 15, 2008 6:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think he wants 6M
And I would imagine this might be it for him once he gets his 300, so if they can spare 6M, I dont know that an incentive would be worth it, unless the base is lower and the ceiling for the incentive is 6M
Okay, just so I understand it... in your wildest fantasy, you are in hell. And you are co-running a bed and breakfast with the devil.
by bren on Nov 15, 2008 10:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That would be my limit...
… incentives raising it to a max of $6m.
If Johnson is on a contending team, he wouldn’t quit after winning #300, which could come in May.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Nov 16, 2008 9:37 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I do understand why Hendry let Wood go
I believe that Wood would have accepted a one-two year deal, but somewhere around 8-10 million smackers (per year). Hendry is probably going to use that $$$ to try to sign RJ, but again is it worth the risk? I do believe it is simply RJ has proven to be a durable SP for most of his career, and his numbers in 08 are considered above average.
However, I do hope (like most Cubs fans) the Cubs gets Peavy, but Towers is expecting a third team to be involved in this deal. I think the Angels can would make an excellent third team in this trade (and it might give Hendry the chance to trade D-Lee). If this deal goes through then I say forget RJ and I would rather focus on signing a LH power hitter, but most likely it would have to be either Abreu, Ibanez, or Dunn.
Overall, Im not going to bash Hendry just yet, but so far this offseason has been quite interesting…
by Geo4MVP on Nov 15, 2008 5:45 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Wood wants 8 million?
If he does, that is a 3.5M raise, but that is not affordable?
"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"
by Grockcubs on Nov 15, 2008 10:13 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
No on Randy
It’s one thing to take a chance on a fielder such as Edmonds but an aging pitcher like Johnson, I have to say no to. I was against the Edmonds signing and was proven wrong and could be proven wrong on Randy too but I think it’s a much bigger risk and I’m not willing to take it.
By the way Al, that spring training clock on the sidebar is only ticking at one second at a time, can’t you make it go faster? It’s been a long offseason already so anything to make spring training get here faster would be a good thing.
A baseball game is simply a nervous breakdown divided into nine innings. ~Earl Wilson
by tucsoncubsfan on Nov 15, 2008 5:57 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Man, I wish it would go faster.
Unfortunately, I have yet to figure out a way to speed up time.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Nov 15, 2008 6:02 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Let's see
Upside… check.
One year contract… check.
Lower salary… check.
Beyond the haircut, the attitude, and the fact that I’ve rooted harder against him than against Jim Edmonds, what’s not to like?
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 15, 2008 5:58 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
nothing
it would be a PERFECT signing for a contending team and a perfect fit for an aging vet looking to pickup his 300th win
by DartmouthCubsFan on Nov 15, 2008 9:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
don't know about "perfect"
But it could be a nice move, depending on the dollars. I’m glad Hendry is looking into it, at least.
by elgato on Nov 16, 2008 7:48 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Perfect, given proper circumstances.
This is one of those moves that I don’t think we’ll be able to call ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ until AFTER it’s made.
I mean, if Johnson gets signed for too much or too long, then I can completely see the groaning and moaning about stepping backward. And it would be completely justified. I’d be at the very front, gnashing my teeth along with the rest of you.
But, a reasonable one year deal on a guy like this, full of incentives? Someone who at least brings those intangibles Al loves so much (me too)? I just can’t see how, in those circumstances, this would be a bad move.
"From childhood's hour I have not been as others were - I have not seen as others saw." - Alone, Edgar Allan Poe
by Edgewood on Nov 17, 2008 9:13 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You mention "other options" of the FA front...
….just wondering who that would be.
Incentive-laden, 1 yr contract, for insurance (I mean, can we get a whole year out of Harden?). I’d do it on the cheap.
Whoever said you can't mix business with pleasure never owned a PuttPutt course---Andy Bernard
by carmen_fanzone on Nov 15, 2008 6:06 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
The odds of Johnson coming to the Cubs are slightly higher
than Marquis and all of his 10 million dollar salary going to the Marlins or Padres . He wants to play for a West Coast team and depleted Dodgers are pretty likely to take him if not I imagine the Giants & Angels will sniff. It does however give me a chance to recount one of Mark Grace’s great pranks when he and Johnson were teammates on the D’Backs.
Johnson who of course spent most of his career in the AL is not exactly a good hitting pitcher and he is not fond of it either. When he was with the D’Backs in 2001 he hit a single , ran up the first base line, tripped over the base and all 6"10 went SPLAT as he fell in a twisted wreck just past first, he was fine and of course safe but the next day when the D’backs went out on the field there was a “dead body” chalk outline of Randy in the spot where he fell. Even he laughed which one rarely sees.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
by Doggie Stalker on Nov 15, 2008 6:45 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Want to put another steak dinner on this one?
I bet he takes the best offer, no matter whether it’s from the Cubs, Dodgers or even the Mets.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Nov 15, 2008 8:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Um Al
He was willing to play FOR HALF PRICE to stay in AZ. I would be happy to bet he stays West if ANY team makes him an offer of 5 or more but don’t see how you can ever know who made the "best " offer.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
by Doggie Stalker on Nov 15, 2008 9:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think he wants to play for anyone...
… who will give him a contract.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Nov 16, 2008 9:37 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
True
But I don’t see the Cubs being the ONLY team offering one. If any West Coast team offers him one even at LESS money
he takes it.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
by Doggie Stalker on Nov 16, 2008 12:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Disagree.
Depends on the deal and the team. (He won’t be a Padre, for example.)
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Nov 16, 2008 12:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Ok Al here is the deal
He signs with the Cubs I buy a steak dinner, he signs with the Dodgers you buy me one .
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
by Doggie Stalker on Nov 16, 2008 1:13 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe...
I normally wouldn’t go this route, trying to sign a 45-year old HOF’er, but I have a feeling Hendry is going to totally screw up this winter and lose both Wood and Dempster. Demp and Wood are supposed to be buds and Demp may not like the way they let Wood go. If Hendry CAN’T get anybody decent to replace either of those two guys, then I’d say give Johnson a try. However, I would be targeting somebody younger and better than Johnson. But like I said, if Hendry can’t get anybody better, sure… give him a try.
One thing though… I wonder how much difference the pay for Johnson’s services with the Cubs would be from what Wood would have accepted?? I have a feeling it wouldn’t be too much of a difference…
by TheHawkRules on Nov 15, 2008 6:49 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
This is a bad idea for so many reasons (old, injury prone, terrible attitude).....but what concerns me most here
…is with the news about Wood this week, this is starting to smell like Hendry has been told by Zell/Crane that they arent going to allow him to sign Dempster either.
Hendry might be trying to scratch together the best cheap roster together he can. That is the only reason you trade Ceda for a aging journeyman reliever, decline Wood’s desire for a one year deal and now pursue an old cranky washed up pitcher.
"When I got to Chicago, fans came to Wrigley Field just to have fun, now they come to see us win. The expectations have changed, for the players and for the fans. It’s about winning." Kerry Wood, 7/14/08
by JB 23 on Nov 15, 2008 6:55 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Uh Oh
Get the feeling that things are starting to fall apart? I do. Hopefully, things begin to turn around soon and the Cubs have a productive winter.
by TheHawkRules on Nov 15, 2008 8:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
that makes no sense
if you were trying to compile the best “cheap” roster you could find you wouldn’t go spend 3-4 million on an arb eligible average middle reliever, you’d keep the younger player and fill the slot in the bullpen out with a less expensive piece like Wuertz
by DartmouthCubsFan on Nov 15, 2008 9:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So if Wuertz is "better" than Gregg? Why make the deal at all then?
…at this point Hendry appears to be just shuffling the deck chairs which tells me his hands might be more tied than we think.
"When I got to Chicago, fans came to Wrigley Field just to have fun, now they come to see us win. The expectations have changed, for the players and for the fans. It’s about winning." Kerry Wood, 7/14/08
by JB 23 on Nov 16, 2008 9:19 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
he's not better
but he’s “similar” and 3-4 million less expensive than Gregg
which is the exact argument people are giving for why we got Gregg, because he’s similar to Kerry and 3-4 million cheaper, right?
So why does that argument hold for acquiring Gregg, but not hold for a major negative of the acquistion?
by DartmouthCubsFan on Nov 16, 2008 1:39 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Washed up?
You need to tell all the National League hitters he is washed up, because he was one of the better pitchers in the NL in the 2nd half. He’s past his prime, but would certainly make a very nice #4 pitcher. If he comes at ^ mil I say it’s a no-brainer. If his back acts up or he self-destructs, we cut bait and move on.
"There's nothing wrong with this team that more hitting, more pitching, more fielding, and more hitting couldn't help." Bill Buckner
by Rotodaddy on Nov 16, 2008 2:02 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
That's why you make it an incentive based deal.
If he makes his 30 starts, he gets his money. If he doesn’t, it costs you less and you can cut him with no problem.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Nov 16, 2008 4:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
This is (er, has become) my position as well. (And, yes, properly structuring the contract is key.)
"I see I'm not the only one around here who can't hold his water." - Last words of the leaky pipe in the visiting team dugout, Dodger Stadium, October 4, 2008.
by dat cubfan daver on Nov 17, 2008 10:41 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
randy
rather see dempster or peavy come aboard.a 45 yr old pitcher with back problems is not the answer.i,ll live wit it if it happens.if we lose wood and demp our staff takes a huge hit.and that,s what won us 97 games.
by NOMAR on Nov 15, 2008 9:03 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
i'm all for it
Randy’s projections next year are in the same ballpark as Dempster (granted more injury risk), and he’d come at a far cheaper price in terms of salary but more importantly in terms of YEARS on the contract. As has already been evidenced this offseason the long-term commitments are HAMPERING this franchise, we need more short term commitments and Johnson fits perfectly into the “win now, but don’t damage the future financial picture” mantra we should be preaching
by DartmouthCubsFan on Nov 15, 2008 9:16 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Johnson Vs Marquis
For those of you like Al who think the Cubs can actually trade Marquis and his 10 million because the market is just DESPERATE for pitchers who would only require a one year commitment a question. RJ is likely to sign for 10 or probably much less if he goes to the Dodgers as is likely and yet you think there are teams out there willing to pay MORE or the same for Marquis ?
PS Al now that I know you are in AZ I will assume it is too much sun rather than liquid or other substances that make you believe this.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
by Doggie Stalker on Nov 15, 2008 9:18 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
It is quite sunny here, true.
But I promise you, I’m not sunburned. Yet.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Nov 16, 2008 9:38 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Enjoying a nice dip in the pool?
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
by Doggie Stalker on Nov 16, 2008 1:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, sure, yeah.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Nov 16, 2008 4:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Let me throw this out here...
Most leaks of this type are done by the players’ agents. It is in his/her best interest to let all GMs in baseball know (via the media) how many other GMs are “interested” in his/her clients. For all we know, Johnson’s agent contacted the Cubs, got a “we’ll be interested in Randy if the Loch Ness Monster is spotted in Lake Michigan this winter” from Jim Hendry, then leaked a story to Paul Sullivan (and others) that the Cubs contacted him/her about Johnson.
This is a pretty common negotiating ploy designed to make the Dodgers and Angels think that there is some urgency in signing Johnson.
"I've never complained about it. I'm thankful to have a jersey." Mark DeRosa, 22 Aug 2007
by DeRoMyHero on Nov 15, 2008 9:19 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
don't disagree
but the CUBS website is reporting that we contacted them…
by DartmouthCubsFan on Nov 15, 2008 9:22 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
They are "reporters" just like Sully, and they get their info from the same sources...
"I've never complained about it. I'm thankful to have a jersey." Mark DeRosa, 22 Aug 2007
by DeRoMyHero on Nov 15, 2008 9:31 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
seems to me
like they get their info from the organization and spin it as such, but maybe i’m wrong here
by DartmouthCubsFan on Nov 15, 2008 9:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
They get the same press releases as everyone,
and for everything else, they are simply media members. Most are former newspaper reporters, and they ply their trade the same way except for the mode of distribution and the fact that certain things (e.g., “Monday mailbag”) are mandated. They have the same “networks”,etc.
"I've never complained about it. I'm thankful to have a jersey." Mark DeRosa, 22 Aug 2007
by DeRoMyHero on Nov 16, 2008 12:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Absolutely correct.
Muskat was, for many years, the Chicago-based AP reporter covering the Cubs.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Nov 16, 2008 12:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Rec'd
In this case, the rumor helps both the Cubs and RJ. With Towers saying the Cubs don’t have an acceptable offer, RJ replaces Peavy as the reminder on Dempster that the Cubs could go a different and cheaper direction.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 15, 2008 10:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So lets go after a 45 year old pitcher
who has chronic back issues, and let go a Cub who would sign for less, and has spent 14 years with the club.
Welcome to Chicago “Big Unit”, and Kerry screw you. Great start to the off season.
"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"
by Grockcubs on Nov 15, 2008 10:18 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Wood has nothing to do with Johnson.
I’m not happy with the Wood situation, but it has little to do with Randy Johnson. It probably has more to do with Ryan Dempster, who will command more money and more years than Johnson.
"There's nothing wrong with this team that more hitting, more pitching, more fielding, and more hitting couldn't help." Bill Buckner
by Rotodaddy on Nov 16, 2008 2:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd sign the Big Unit to a one year deal in a nanosecond
If he would agree to pitch in his least favorite ballpark in the majors (that being Wrigley and it’s inability to accomodate his 6’10" frame)?? Then I’d sign him in a heartbeat.
McGrath: I got a good deal on those boys. The scouts said they showed a lot of promise.
Reggie Dunlop: They brought their f***in' TOYS with 'em!
McGrath: Well, I'd rather have em playin with their toys than playin with themselves.
Reggie Dunlop: They're too dumb to play with themselves. Boy, every piece of garbage that comes into the market and you gotta buy it!
by MDBNIU on Nov 15, 2008 10:30 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Thinking outside the box...........
Let’s pick up The Big Unit and make him our new closer.
Hey Lou, we're long overdue.
by deadcatbounce on Nov 16, 2008 6:48 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
He'd be a good closer, actually.
Less stress on his arm, and the intimidation factor.
I doubt this is what Hendry has in mind, but credit to you for original thinking.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Nov 16, 2008 9:39 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Would Johnson getting his 300th win with the Cubs...
or some other random team be all that different than Tom Seaver getting his with the White Sox? I know Seaver a couple of years with them, but his time with the Sox is an afterthought to his HOF career.
by bison on Nov 16, 2008 2:05 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
True enough.
I had forgotten about Seaver — and the way he even got to the White Sox was nothing short of bizarre (he was a compensation pick for the Sox losing Steve Mura to free agency, in that brief period where you could do that).
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Nov 16, 2008 4:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Phil Niekro and Don Sutton
Phil Niekro got his 300th win with the Yankees in 1985 and not the Braves. Don Sutton got his 300th victory with the Angels in 1986 and not the Dodgers.
"The big possum walks late." - Harry Caray
by memphiscub on Nov 17, 2008 12:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
However...
… Niekro had put up a 16-8 season for the Yankees the year before, and Sutton had been gone from the Dodgers for six years before his 300th win.
This would be more like Early Wynn returning to Cleveland (although Johnson would be LEAVING his old team) after several years with the White Sox, for the sole purpose of getting his 300th win.
He entered the 1963 season, at age 43, with 299 career wins. He made three starts and a relief appearance, losing one of the starts, before finally getting the 300th win — his last — on July 13, 1963, in the second game of a DH vs. the lowly A’s. He had to be taken out after five innings, barely leading 5-4, to preserve his chance at the 300th win. He did finish the year, but started only one more game.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Nov 17, 2008 6:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
A few thoughts on the Unit
If I were Randy Johnson, I would be pissed if I heard people describing me as “injury prone” or having “chronic back problems”. The truth is, RJ has been one of the most durable pitchers of his generation. In his 21 year career he has made over 30 starts 16 times. Throw out the first couple of years when he had control issues. one year with the Mariners when he had knee surgery, and 2007 when he had back surgery, he basically has made every scheduled start and has never had an arm problem to speak of. His durability is legendary. Even last year. coming off a 2nd back surgery in a little over a year, (word is the 1st surgery was not totally successful), and at age 44, he managed to make 30 starts and was doing a pretty good imitation of the 1999 Unit most of the year.
It’s not as if he is like the late lamented Kerry Wood who has made 30+ starts exactly TWICE in his career, with arm problems galore.
Having said that, I agree with Jessica that the chances are nearly zero that RJ signs with the Cubs. I only see it if there are no other viable options left for him. But, if the opportunity were there for Hendry, I’d do it in a NY minute. RJ can still deal, although he gives up a lot more big flies than he used to and that is a concern.
by azjazzman on Nov 16, 2008 2:41 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Sidebar
A couple of years ago, I met a bet with Jessica when she told me there was NO WAY RJ would make it to 300 wins.
I mentioned yesterday that it would be ironic if he won #300 at Wrigley. She replied that she would like to see him win #300 no matter where it is, because she saw both Maddux and Glavine win their 300th game in person, and how many people can say they were there to see 3 different pitchers win #300?
by azjazzman on Nov 16, 2008 3:08 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Well, count me as one who saw Maddux and Glavine in person, also.
So if she and I both see RJ do it, that’d make at least two of us.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Nov 16, 2008 4:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I know of at least one other person...
And all 3 of you almost saw Clemens do it.
by bison on Nov 16, 2008 8:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Hmmm.
I’m not sure Jessica and the Jazzman were at Wrigley in June 2003.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Nov 16, 2008 10:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Not me
My Yankee fan friend had my tickets and he nearly punched some poor guy who bumped into him after the game
he was in such a bad move. Thing is I don’t see any chance RJ is going for #300 as a Cub, I would be willing to travel to see it
but not as far as the West Coast so unless he is say playing the Phillies I probably won’t get a chance.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
by Doggie Stalker on Nov 17, 2008 9:55 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well...
don’t look down upon the move.
If I’m given the choice in 2009:
1) Ryan Dempster or
2.) Jake Peavy and Randy Johnson
…I’ll take #2.
So if the Cubs have a real shot at Peavy, I really like the one-year deal for Johnson. Gives another year to develop a SP, or some flexibility in trades/FA next year. Also, even at his age, I think Johnson would be be the best #5 in the league.
Now if RJ is there in lieu of both Dempster and Peavy………color me skeptical and worried.
But Seeing:
Zambrano
Harden
Lilly
Peavy
Johnson….
……in Cubs uniforms next year would give me a big offseason smile on my face.
"Bite my shiny metal ass!" -- Bender Bending Rodriguez
"Life is just one crushing defeat after another until you just wish Flanders was dead."
by The Jade Scorpion on Nov 16, 2008 3:32 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Injury prone???
How can a guy who will go down as one of the absolute greatest and most dominant pitchers of all time en route to chalking up 294 wins, nearly 5,000 strikeouts, 1 World Series, 5 Cy Youngs and 2 no-hitters be termed “injury prone” throughout his career ??
BCB, home of the insidious campaign of the clueless to "Dustyfy" an outstanding manager in Lou Piniella.
by MDBNIU on Nov 16, 2008 5:38 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
John Perotto at BP.com
(behind a subscriber wall) wrote:
Despite their seemingly ugly breakup this past week, some close to the situation believe that free agent Randy Johnson will still be in a Diamondbacks’ uniform on Opening Day, though the Dodgers and Cubs have interest in the veteran left-hander. … Also breaking up to make up could be Kerry Wood, who may return to the Cubs on a low-budget contract with the market for relief pitching this winter flooded, and in light of the limited interest being shown in the big right-hander by other teams. … Dempster re-signing with the Cubs is no longer a certainty after he turned down a four-year, $50 million offer, especially since they want to have money available to sign a left-handed hitting outfielder, either Bobby Abreu or Raul Ibanez.
So, I’m assuming Johnson pitches for AZ. More interesting is the idea that Kerry could come back to the Cubs. That would give us another explanation for the Kerry-Hendry disconnect in interviews – there may well have been a communication breakdown, or Kerry could have reonconsidered after seeing a longer deal just wasn’t out there.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 16, 2008 6:50 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
That's entirely possible.
Apart from the offer out there from the Yankees to CC, we haven’t seen any concrete offers laid out, accepted or rejected by anyone… yet.
It’s still only the middle of November. Much can happen before spring training begins. Or even after.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Nov 16, 2008 10:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It's a longshot on Wood, but...
anything’s possible. I think they can still sign a one-year deal, plus a club or mutual option. Hopefully, Jim and Co can find the funds after seeing a weeks worth of backlash.
You ARE freaking out MAN!
by crw89 on Nov 17, 2008 9:08 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And, seeing that no one's making a ton of offers...
… and perhaps realizing they improve the team by doing so.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Nov 17, 2008 9:35 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
DO IT!
What do we have to lose. Didn’t read all the chatter, but could he come out of the pen at all? Start here and there maybe? He’d be great for this team, a guy whose been to the mountain top. DLEE has, but he’s not really a vocal leader. Towards the end of the season and in the playoffs it’d be nice to have Johnson coming on in the 7th or 8th to get us out of a jam.
Why not take the chance?
by HomerInTheGloamin' on Nov 16, 2008 7:28 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
comparing Randy Johnson to David Wells
is ridiculous. Randy Johnson is one of the best pitchers ever to play. David Wells….one of the biggest, perhaps. But Johnson was really good last year, and unlike Dempster, wouldn’t take a multi-year deal to get, for obvious reasons. And 6 million for a pitcher of his caliber is chump change—an average starter goes for 10 million these days. I’d say go for it— makes more sense than buying high for Dempster, a guy that truly has been injury prone, and is coming off of by far his best year at 31. I mean worst case scenario is we pay him and he gets hurt, then let marshall pitch. But the potential upside of Johnson is tremendous, unlike many other options, including watching Dempster hurtle back to reality next year (as much as I love the year he had),
by doug dascenzo's change-up on Nov 16, 2008 9:54 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Dempster injury-prone?
Since when? Not since he’s been a Cub. He had the oblique injury in 2007 — unrelated to his arm. He was completely healthy in 2008.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Nov 16, 2008 10:44 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Methinks this term "injury prone"...
…is thrown around a little too cavalierly.
"I see I'm not the only one around here who can't hold his water." - Last words of the leaky pipe in the visiting team dugout, Dodger Stadium, October 4, 2008.
by dat cubfan daver on Nov 17, 2008 10:45 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
Along with some other worn out phrases, offered without any statistical or anecdotal support. i.e., “he’s a butcher in the field”, or “can’t hit”, etc
by azjazzman on Nov 17, 2008 2:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
the only reason
i mention “injury prone” with dempster is the fact that he has missed as much time due to injury in ten years as johnson has in twenty. and dempster was injured most of the first year he was a cub, al. that’s why we got him so cheap. The perception here on johnson seems a bit tainted— it’s not like the guy threw 50 innings last year— try 184, and if you look at his peripherals, he was about as good as dempster (esp. k/9, k/bb, whip). I do worry about signing ryan to a huge multi-year deal, when a one year option is available (although i’d love to have them both). point being, no way is johnson signing for an “incentive laden deal”. not after the year he had last year. colon, prior, maybe brad penney could be had on “incentive laden deals” but i seriously doubt johnson would sign for that. besides, we’re talking one year for a #4 or #5 pitcher….
by doug dascenzo's change-up on Nov 17, 2008 11:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
A Gregg-Marmol-Wood bullpen is ridiculous
Devin Hester, you are ridiculous! -Jeff Joniak
by ARAM FOR MVP on Nov 17, 2008 12:28 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Rather have him than a healthy Marquis
I’d rather have an aging, injury prone (not to mention butt-ugly) Randy Johnson as a fifth starter over Jason Marquis. Perhaps my dislike of Marquis has clouded my judgement, but what can I say?
When I hit a home run over the fence at Wrigley Field, I hit it over a Tru Link Fence. -Andre Dawson-
by wangchung on Nov 17, 2008 1:57 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I think this is less likely about disliking Marquis
and more about the fact that Randy Johnson is one of this generation’s greatest pitchers and Marquis is… at best… one of this generation’s greatest hitting pitchers?
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 17, 2008 2:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 

















