Towers finds a third team?
Yahoo's Tim Brown has new info on Jake Peavy:
Padres general manager Kevin Towers said Wednesday night he might have identified a third team that would facilitate sending the standout pitcher to the Cubs, who don’t possess the depth in prospects or big league-ready talent to meet the Padres’ asking price.
Feel free to pose your guesses in the comments. Cubs top prospect Josh Vitters seems the most reasonable candidate to be in the middle of this trade. The 19 year-old third baseman is a few years away from the bigs, while the Padres want MLB-ready talent. Brown says Towers plans to speak with Jim Hendry after the Thanksgiving holiday.
Looks like something might be starting to happen.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
1 recs |
80 comments
Comments
Perhaps something IS in the works...
…but this also seems like misinformation. When was the last time a GM gave the public play-by-play of a trade that was about to happen?
Instead, I think that the Cubs will use this to leverage whichever free agents they’re after (or trades they’re after) and I think this might get some other team (Yankees) to commit to more than they want to because they’re feeling like Peavy might be slipping away.
One thing you learned as a Cubs fan: when you bought you ticket, you could bank on seeing the bottom of the ninth.
Joe Garagiola
by Ryan at Cubshub on Nov 27, 2008 8:34 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
You gotta love Kevin Towers
Seriously, he’s been remarkably open throughout this process, which I think is more a product of his personality, rather than some bargaining ploy. if he were that shrewd, the Pads might not be in this mess to begin with.
Okay, just so I understand it... in your wildest fantasy, you are in hell. And you are co-running a bed and breakfast with the devil.
by bren on Nov 27, 2008 8:50 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Shrewd
We’ll leave that up to Sandy Alderson, Fuson and Depodesta and the rest of the moneyball gang they’ve have assembled in San Diego.
by Slamdog on Nov 27, 2008 3:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The thing that gets me...
Is they were in the playoffs last year were it not for that b.s. call at home with Holliday….its been quite a dropoff.
Okay, just so I understand it... in your wildest fantasy, you are in hell. And you are co-running a bed and breakfast with the devil.
by bren on Nov 27, 2008 3:49 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I get your point, but I have to nitpick
Holliday was never tagged and did not tag the plate. Technically, the play should still be going on.
Even if he was called out, the game was tied — there is no guarantee that San Diego would have won. They blew the game themselves before that call.
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Nov 28, 2008 7:41 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
??????
is this even news?? might have found a 3rd team. I might win the lottery saturday night. mites grow on chicken’s……..!! we might win back to back world series. some day we might have to build a new stadium. might might might
Dear Santa:: All I want for X-mas this year is an official 2009 Jake Peavy Cubs Jersey. Oh and a Beimel one too. I've been a real good guy for the most part!!!
by cubsluver22 on Nov 27, 2008 9:12 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Towers has been around a long time
and I don’t remember him always being this chatty about potential trades. It seems like it wouldn’t be in his best interests to go about it this way.
"Enough foreplay- let's get crackin'"- Fred Garvin
by davidalanu on Nov 27, 2008 9:19 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I think his hands are tied though...
B/C it seems that Peavy is intent on coming to Chicago, but I heard him on espn news, or maybe one of the Insiders was describing him, anyways, the sentiment was he does business openly and honestly and doesnt see that as a negative.
Posing and posturing is a part of trading and/or free agency, so I guess he doesnt mind cutting through the b.s.
Okay, just so I understand it... in your wildest fantasy, you are in hell. And you are co-running a bed and breakfast with the devil.
by bren on Nov 27, 2008 10:33 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It says he might have
then again maybe he didn’t, or maybe he did. Hmmm, maybe he found a 4th team too. There is nothing new here.
Please leave this story alone. My guess is that Towers backed himself in a corner and is now trying to save face because with the Dempster signing Hendry isn’t interested unless Towers is giving Peavy away.
by rlpete on Nov 27, 2008 9:24 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Towers talks too much
Who needs rumor mill reporters when you have a GM with a big mouth.
I’d like to see this trade but the guy has got to start pumping those breaks and stop chatting so much!
by ak123 on Nov 27, 2008 10:35 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Edited to put the material from MLBTR in a quote box.
In the future, please don’t copy/paste material from other sites without doing this. That’s a copyright violation and not acceptable here.
Also, it would have helped if you had added some of your own thoughts to this post — there’s nothing original here.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Nov 27, 2008 10:50 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
How do you
put the box around the quote exactly?… Just for future reference
by dlee25 on Nov 27, 2008 11:16 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Take the text you want to highlight...
… highlight it, then press the " icon above the posting box.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Nov 27, 2008 11:20 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think we are going to get him for .60 cents o the dollar
i know lou said we dont need him but if you can get Jake Peavy on a discount u do it.. he is that good.. I guess i would give up vitters in a deal to get him as rough as that sounds… i really like vitters too….
"I played with one of the best pitchers in history, Greg Maddux," Zambrano said"
by fischisgod on Nov 27, 2008 11:28 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
happy thanksgiving all
"I played with one of the best pitchers in history, Greg Maddux," Zambrano said"
by fischisgod on Nov 27, 2008 11:29 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
The problem with KT "finding" the third team...
is that he has to propose trading one (or more) Cubs players to the third team for the player he wants without necessarily knowing that the Cubs would be willing to give that player up for Peavy. That is mighty presumptuous of him.
Example: KT proposes trading Mark DeRosa from the Cubs to the Twins for Nick Blackburn. The Dads would then get Blackburn, Pie, Cedeño/Fontenot, and possibly a fourth player (Vitters? Marshall?). That’s great for KT, and it gets the Twins the 3B they need. However, the Cubs might not be willing to give up DeRo for Peavy — especially if they give up Fontenot and don’t get salary relief on Marquis.
Until I read that Jim Hendry is looking for a third team I will believe that Peavy is not coming to the Cubs.
"I've never complained about it. I'm thankful to have a jersey." Mark DeRosa, 22 Aug 2007
by DeRoMyHero on Nov 27, 2008 12:58 PM CST reply actions 2 recs
Not give up DeRo for Peavy?
Cmon. Peavy, Z and Harden could be a dominant trio for the next 5 years.. If the Cubs deal DeRo, Fontenot’s going nowhere. It’s not like Fontenot’s not some deal breaker and replacing DeRo with Fontenot saves money…
SORIANO! YESSSSSSSS! JIMBO!!!
by CubFaninCA on Nov 27, 2008 1:36 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't necessarily disagree with you.
However, you don’t know how untouchable (or not) DeRo is to Lou Piniella. Neither does Kevin Towers.
If Lou is more worried about offense than pitching, it doesn’t make sense to give up one of his top 2008 bats (DeRo) and his top bench bat (Fontenot, whom KT might want) and end up with Mark Loretta or Ronny Cedeño at 2B.
I also highly doubt if Harden will last for even two more years as a SP before someone decides to pull a “Kerry Wood” and makes him a reliever.
"I've never complained about it. I'm thankful to have a jersey." Mark DeRosa, 22 Aug 2007
by DeRoMyHero on Nov 27, 2008 2:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
As much as I like DeRosa
I don’t get the impression that Lou sees DeRosa as a crucial part of the offense. In fact, my impression is that Lou wouldn’t complain if the middle IF went from Theriot-DeRosa (with Fontenot) to Furcal-Theriot-Fontenot.
DeRosa is the most likely trade candidate in a 3-way trade, I believe. And the Twins are a good match. However, I wonder if there’s a big enough package to offer the Twins to move Delmon Young over to San Diego. Delmon would give them a big enough name to help the PR problem of moving Peavy.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 28, 2008 5:48 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree that DeRo is a likely trade candidate.
He is a RHB, not a base-stealer, and a ready-made scapegoat for Lou because of his error.
From KT’s perspective, however, I’m not sure that Young is the answer. He is looking for a stud young SP. If all he wanted were a boatload of talent, he would take Vitters, Pie, Castillo, and Atkins/Marshall and not bother with the third team. The Twins have young SPs, and might be willing to give up one for a 3B.
I do think that one of (Harden, Marquis) will be dumped for salary reasons if the Peavy trade is completed. It’s possible that both will be dumped if the LHB gets to be too expensive.
"I've never complained about it. I'm thankful to have a jersey." Mark DeRosa, 22 Aug 2007
by DeRoMyHero on Nov 28, 2008 1:31 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
DeRo & Vitters
What kind of talent does MN send to SD, if they get both DeRo and Vitters.?? DeRo does sound ideal for MN, and MN has some young pitching.
SORIANO! YESSSSSSSS! JIMBO!!!
by CubFaninCA on Nov 28, 2008 1:37 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well
Minnesota has Delmon Young whom they want to trade and young pitching they might be willing to trade. There are definite options for Towers to look at.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 28, 2008 2:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So perhaps
Pie, DeRo and Vitters to MN and Young and a pitcher to SD?
SORIANO! YESSSSSSSS! JIMBO!!!
by CubFaninCA on Nov 28, 2008 2:16 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
My guess is that SD wants Pie more than MN
Minnesota has too many OFs and a top-tier defender in CF.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 28, 2008 2:19 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
No way it's DeRo AND Vitters
If a third team is needed in order to get that SP prospect(s) that SD seems to want, and if DeRo is what it takes to pull off a deal with that third team, then I gotta believe the Cubs pull back on Vitters.
I can see the Cubs giving up DeRosa to make this deal happen or emptying the farm, i.e. Vitters, to make this deal happen, but not both. That’s too much and the Cubs don’t need another starter that much.
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
by ballhawk on Nov 29, 2008 12:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You're probably right.
When I tried below to work out how a 3-way might happen, I could only see the Cubs including both DeRosa and Vitters if they got more than just Peavy.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 29, 2008 1:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If DeRosa...
…can be replaced with a quality LH bat, the lineup becomes better as it would if Lee was replaced with the same type of hitter.
I really really like DeRosa and I think Lou does more than most on this board give him credit for. The goal though is to improve the team, and DeRosa just so happens to be one of the most tradable pieces. I don’t think either Hendry or Piniella are saying “we have to trade DeRosa”, but they are probably saying “we need a good LH bat”.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
by MPH73 on Nov 28, 2008 1:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Giles
DeRo can be replaced with Giles.
Cubs gives up – DeRo, Marshall, Cedeno, Pie, Vitters & Marquis (Cubs pay of 1/2 Marquis’ salary)
Cubs get – Peavy & Giles
SD gives up – Peavy & Giles
SD gets – MN pitcher or 2, Pie, Marshall, Cedeno, Marquis
MN gives up – Pitcher or 2
MN gets – DeRo & Vitters
Cubs lineup:
Sori, Theriot, Giles, ARam, Lee, Soto, Fontenot and Fukudome
SORIANO! YESSSSSSSS! JIMBO!!!
by CubFaninCA on Nov 28, 2008 1:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
what part
of giles has a no trade clause and has been quoted numerous times as to saying he wants to stay on the west coast dont you all understand?? why the constant proposals with giles involved he in his last years and for this year at least he controls his destiny.
Dear Santa:: All I want for X-mas this year is an official 2009 Jake Peavy Cubs Jersey. Oh and a Beimel one too. I've been a real good guy for the most part!!!
by cubsluver22 on Nov 28, 2008 1:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
NTC
I’ve seen nothing about a full NTC.
signed 3-year deal worth 30M thru 2008 season on 12/1/05- + he receives a 2M signing bonus and salaries of 7M in 2006, 9M in 2007 and 9M in 2008- + the deal includes a Team Option for 2009 worth 9M or a 3M buyout- + if traded, his salary rises by 2M- + he receives a full NO-TRADE clause in 2006 and a limited NO-TRADE clause in 2007 and 2008 that allows him to veto trades to eight teams (BOS, BAL, DET, WAS, MIL, TAM, FLA and PIT)
http://www.mlb4u.com/profile.php?id=1016
SORIANO! YESSSSSSSS! JIMBO!!!
by CubFaninCA on Nov 28, 2008 1:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I believe
its called 10 and 5. 10 years in the league—5yrs with the same team.
Dear Santa:: All I want for X-mas this year is an official 2009 Jake Peavy Cubs Jersey. Oh and a Beimel one too. I've been a real good guy for the most part!!!
by cubsluver22 on Nov 28, 2008 2:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Doubtful he opposes a trade...
SD could have let him go onto the market and make less. He could have got the $3 million buyout from SD and $5 million from another team. Possibly a very undesirable team…. Now he could get $9 million + the $2 million added to his contract, if traded.
SORIANO! YESSSSSSSS! JIMBO!!!
by CubFaninCA on Nov 28, 2008 2:33 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
One thing that confuses me...
…is why did the Padres pick up Giles option for (I think about 9 mil) if they are trying to cut payroll so much? He certainly isn’t a marquis type player you need to draw fans. Maybe the Pads agreed to pick up his option if Giles agreed to be traded.
Just guessing here, and I think we will find out what happens with him fairly soon.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
by MPH73 on Nov 28, 2008 2:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
It costs them 3 M to refuse the option and potentially 0 dollars to trade him (if he accepts a trade, which he’s said he’d do, but he also said he thought SD was a bench player or two from competing).
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 28, 2008 2:16 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
doesn’t add up for a team trying to reduce their budget to $40 million.
SORIANO! YESSSSSSSS! JIMBO!!!
by CubFaninCA on Nov 28, 2008 2:21 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I would like peavy
but this seems to just be a ploy to try and fool other teams into the notion that the cubs are hot for peavy…..the pads just want to up the offers from other teams on peavy.
by cubsmania on Nov 27, 2008 1:43 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Will this ever end
Peavy will be a Cub and then I will close for Cubs.
"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"
by Grockcubs on Nov 27, 2008 2:29 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
How's your fastball?
Before each game, please remember to feed the bats.
by Cool Hand on Nov 27, 2008 3:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Available pitching
What teams have young pitchers available?? I’ve seen Minnesota, Florida and San Francisco mentioned.
Also, am wondering if Lee to SF is a possibility?? Lee’s from Sacramento and of course this would depend on replacing Lee with Dunn.. Could be why Hendry’s dragging his feet on the deal. ;)
SORIANO! YESSSSSSSS! JIMBO!!!
by CubFaninCA on Nov 27, 2008 3:16 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
And that's the reason
—one of them — one of many — that Peavy will eventually become a Cub. The Padres, no matter what’s said in public — want Peavy off the payroll. He wll not be their opening day starter.
Towers is the only guy with intellegence in the organization — he’s surrounded by a ship o’ fools, including the owner, John Moores — launched the USS FIre Sale with his divorce. However, Towers is following orders. Launching Peavy is Job 2. (Releasing Hoffman was #1)
Many individuals on this site will be surprised in the manner that Peavy becomes a Cub. It will not be conventional. It will be strange. It will take time.
We think the Cubs have done business in a strange matter in their history — it takes a back seat to the local franchise, which is in one of the weirdest situations in team history..
You all want to deal in logic, I understand — but what ever is going to happen will be somewhat illogical, especially for the Padres — and their fans.
This team has had a bizarre history, starting with the world’s worst uniforms…
There’s last-minute sale of the team to Ray Kroc, keeping it from moving to DC.
And, who in this market forgets the Tom Werner Fire sale of the early 90s.
Lest we not forget Rosanne’s version of the National Anthem in the 80s….leading to a condemnation of her and the team.
Sure, the Pads have never had a College Of Coaches — but you never know….
Unfortunately, the few bright spots (the only bright spots) in the team’s history — have come at our expense.
And that, still — remains a sore spot….
by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Nov 27, 2008 6:11 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
Which is yet another reason...
… that Peavy will NOT become a Cub. Why would Jim Hendry want to make a deal with this dysfunctional organization?
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Nov 28, 2008 4:21 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think that's relevant, actually
He deals with McPhail, after all . . .
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Nov 28, 2008 7:44 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He's dealt with SD a lot
and can get Peavy at a discount..
SORIANO! YESSSSSSSS! JIMBO!!!
by CubFaninCA on Nov 28, 2008 10:58 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The more dysfunctinoal...
…the more likely Peavy could be had on the cheap, Cubs or someone else.
Things like that slob and the anthem, I couldn’t care less; or the uniforms for that matter. But the fire sale and the team’s last-minute sale are interesting things that SDSJM brings up.
I would’t mind seeing Peavy with the Cubs, since I know they’ll never bid for CC. If the price they pay – in return bodies – isn’t too big, then they may have some trade chips for another player later. That is unless it’s a FA they sign for the leadoff spot.
Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.
by blackhawk24 on Nov 28, 2008 7:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
well let's see...
would you rather play poker with a bunch of WSOP pros or a bunch of trust-fund babies who are still trying to figure out which card is the Old Maid…
Just because the Padres braintrust is the epitome of incompetence doesn’t mean Peavy is.
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
by ballhawk on Nov 29, 2008 1:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think he will be gone but I could se them waiting for trade deadline...
…if they feel that the FA market right now is lowering his trade value too much.
by DudeVf11 on Nov 28, 2008 11:53 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
rec'd
this is not a normal trade.. We are dealing with a dysfunctional organization THAT HAS TO CLEAR PAYROLL… thats good… Moore wants his cash… We will get him for dimes on the dollar
"I played with one of the best pitchers in history, Greg Maddux," Zambrano said"
by fischisgod on Nov 29, 2008 11:44 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
that Nate Colbert baseball card I had as a kid still gives me nightmares
man, were those uniforms hideous…
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
by ballhawk on Nov 29, 2008 12:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You mean this card, I presume.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Nov 29, 2008 3:49 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Arrgggghhhh!!!! That's the one
I presume this is payback for my little Muskrat Love post from a few days ago.
Well played…
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
by ballhawk on Nov 29, 2008 4:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Thank you!
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Nov 29, 2008 5:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
my guess
look, this was a difficult game for towers from the beginning. He was dealing from the short deck. I think this is one last play at pushing Frank Wren. Atlanta isn’t going to get Sabathia. Their chances at Lowe or Burnett are rather slim, and they’ve turned away from Sheets. They want an impact arm – there isn’t much left.
That said, let’s assume that this report is legit. Who might be a third team? Well, let’s look at it this way – what’s our best chip to land quality pitching? Probably Josh Vitters. What team would deal quality pitching talent for someone like Vitters? Probably a team rebuilding, or a team loaded with pitching. The first team that pops into my mind is Seattle. With Ramirez/Aumont, there’s some young arms to spin, and Tuiaiasosopo is intriguing, but not exemplary. Either way, they could use a young power bat.
I guess it’s possible a team deals a high end pitching prospect in A ball for some “ready” pieces, but I fail to see what works right now (although admittedly, I’m not thinking too deeply on it).
If we get said arm (assume Vitters and probably another piece or two), then we would spin said arm, probably Pie, perhaps Cedeno, and perhaps one more for Peavy.
Is it worth it if it costs that much?
That said, I still think they are playing for Atlanta by using Chicago as leverage. And I’m not all that sold that we should go all out to load the rotation up.
by toonsterwu on Nov 27, 2008 7:40 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Identifying the third team
I think a trade for Peavy has to include a dump of Marquis or a trade of one of the Cubs’ good pitchers, both to open a rotation spot and to clear payroll. Towers can’t find a third team for one of our NTC pitchers, and I doubt Hendry would be pleased if Towers is shopping Harden. (Let’s also take a moment to be thankful that for all Towers’ openness, he hasn’t been naming Cub player names.) So, from my perspective, the third team needs to be a team that is willing to take on payroll.
The M’s could still be willing to take on payroll-but not another SP.
As for the idea that this is leverage against Atlanta – sure, yeah, although Towers better hope Lou doesn’t say anything more.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 28, 2008 5:59 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
side note
but I don’t think Towers has actually, himself, named Braves players either. Others have said things and guessed at it, but I don’t think Towers have ever said it.
And yeah, a trade would mean dumping Marquis, but what I was thinking was that would be a separate deal, not involving a Peavy deal (if this was ’real’).
by toonsterwu on Nov 28, 2008 11:35 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It depends on how tight the Cubs' payroll is.
With Harden, they could go into the season with a 6 man rotation, but I’d guess Jim does not want his Marquis leverage taken away by obtaining Marquis’ replacement before dumping that contract.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 28, 2008 2:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Marquis
SD could take Marquis, if the Cubs eat half his contract and take Giles.. SD could use a starter.. The 3rd team would send a pitcher or two for Vitters.
SORIANO! YESSSSSSSS! JIMBO!!!
by CubFaninCA on Nov 28, 2008 11:55 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Jus' Wonderin'...
Having eaten too much turkey, and having to collapse after cleaning the kitchen, I’m just wondering how much Frank Wren has to do with this…
Knowns:
1. John Schuerholtz had an ironclad policy against giving NTCs out. He never gave one to Glavine, Smoltz, Maddux, or Chipper. So far, Wren seems to be adhering to this policy.
2. Schuerholtz also had a rule against giving pitchers contracts of longer than three years, though he bent the rule for Maddux and in the trade for Hampton. It is not yet known whether or not Wren will abide by this rule or for whom he might make an exception.
3. Wren has stated that he hopes to acquire two “top-flight” starting pitchers this winter. He excluded Smoltz, Glavine, and Hampton from the “top-flight” definition, though he did not rule out signing any of them in addition to his two new pitchers.
4. Peavy has a NTC.
Could the Braves actually be hoping that Peavy lands with the Cubs? Wren knows that the Cubs can’t afford a Z/Peavy/Demp/Harden/Lilly/Marquis rotation. Wren might feel that his best chance to acquire a SP would be a trade with the Cubs. The Braves don’t have a LHB power bat in the OF, but they would possibly trade one of (Escobar, Johnson) and LHB Brandon Jones (good hitter, doubles power, not a CF) or a prospect or two for Lilly or Harden. They might also consider Marquis — Mazzone isn’t there any more — if the Cubs throw in $3M and they don’t get A.J. or Lowe.
This could help the Cubs. Escobar would be an upgrade at SS, though he isn’t an ideal leadoff hitter. Johnson is a LHB who can play 2B or LF (and could probably handle RF). He also isn’t an ideal leadoff or middle-of-the-order bat, but he fits the “athletic” label. Brandon Jones is a line-drive hitter that doesn’t have LF power or a CF glove; he has a little power and might be able to handle RF. The Cubs could also get a prospect or two and flip them as needed, or even ask for Gonzalez or Soriano. If they get Johnson, they can either move DeRo (or KJ) to RF or trade DeRo for a RF bat.
Wren knows that he has a bunch of young pitchers on the doorstep, at least one of whom looks like ace material (Hanson). What he needs are pitchers to bridge the gap until the youngsters arrive. Lilly has two years left, Marquis has one, and Harden has one. He can let them walk and collect the draft picks just as his youngsters will be ready.
Just a thought. I think that SDSJ is right about KT having almost no choice but to trade Peavy to the Cubs; the question is how much will the price fall now that he has overplayed his hand.
"I've never complained about it. I'm thankful to have a jersey." Mark DeRosa, 22 Aug 2007
by DeRoMyHero on Nov 27, 2008 9:08 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
with the amount of money the braves have
i find it hard to think that they’ll trade away escobar or johnson for a middle of the rotation starter or an end of the rotation type. They have guys that can likely match what Marquis can do, notwithstanding the fact that Bobby Cox had issues with Marquis as well, if i remember correctly. They don’t have replacements of Escobar or Johnson on hand that easily.
I don’t think they would ponder dealing Escobar for a 2nd level pitcher. In the right deal, maybe Johnson, but even I would have my doubts about that.
by toonsterwu on Nov 27, 2008 11:49 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I've thought, for a while,
that Lilly to Atlanta makes a lot of sense. It’s even possible that Atlanta could be a third team in a Peavy trade.
And if the Cubs were willing to risk a young player, Jordan Schafer could be the lead-off man of the future and LH bat the Cubs are looking for.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 28, 2008 6:06 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
re:
I really don’t see the Braves forking Jordan Schafer over in a trade for Ted Lilly. Most people still expect Schafer to be a plus offense solid glove CF. Btw, with Schafer’s plus power, along with a decent amount of K’s, and average SB capability, I don’t think he’s best utilized in the leadoff spot.
Maybe you are thinking of Gorkys Hernandez, who profiles as a potential leadoff hitting plus glove CF.
by toonsterwu on Nov 28, 2008 11:38 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
What I read about Schafer had me thinking of him as a Johnny Damon type.
But it’s been a while since I looked at him.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 28, 2008 2:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i would definitely do lilly for schaefer if peavy came...
i would also do lilly for escobar plus a prospect… i think if we get peavy then we are in a sick position to deal from strength… Does Z have a NTC?
"I played with one of the best pitchers in history, Greg Maddux," Zambrano said"
by fischisgod on Nov 29, 2008 11:47 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Z has a NTC and Lilly has a limited one
so we wouldn’t really be dealing from strength unless we wanted to deal Harden, which I would not recommend.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 29, 2008 12:15 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Are the Twins the Third Team?
The Twins have a lot of young pitching to trade from Scott Baker quality to Boof Bonser not-so-quality. Plus, they have at least one extra OF to trade, recent rumors having Delmon Young on the block. Meanwhile, the Twins need infielders. What’s interesting about trying to match up the Twins, Padres, and Cubs is that there are a lot pieces that could go in multiple directions.
Filling in the Twins need at 3B could be Mark DeRosa, but it could also be Kevin Kouzmanoff.
Ronny Cedeno could go help the Padres’ middle IF, but he could also go help the Twins’ middle IF.
Josh Vitters has been rumored to be on the Padres’ receiving end, but he might make more sense for the Twins who have no long-term 3B answer
The Cubs could look to add Brian Giles or they could look to add Jason Kubel.
Here’s one possible trade
Padres get Delmon Young, Felix Pie, Sean Marshall, Nick Blackburn, Boof Bonser
Twins get Mark DeRosa, Josh Vitters, Ronny Cedeno, Jason Marquis
Cubs get Jake Peavy, Brian Giles; then sign Rafael Furcal
The Padres get Delmon Young as a centerpiece in their trade of Peavy, plus three pitchers with potential but also a lot of question marks. They have a nice, inexpensive OF of Young-Pie-Gerut (with questions still about what to do with Headley/Kouzmanoff).
The Twins get both a short- and long-term answer at 3B, plus a SS who fits the mold of what they like for middle IF.
The Cubs run out a lineup with a lot more lefty balance, that could look something like this:
Furcal SS
Fontenot/Theriot 2B
DLee 1B
Ramirez 3B
Soriano LF
Giles RF
Soto C
Fukudome CF
or, perhaps this:
Padres get Josh Vitters, Felix Pie, Ryan Theriot, Sean Marshall, Nick Blackburn, Boof Bonser
Twins get Kevin Kouzmanoff, Ronny Cedeno, Michael Wuertz, Jason Marquis
Cubs get Jake Peavy, Khalil Greene, Jason Kubel
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 29, 2008 1:48 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
You know...
… I have a lot of respect for you, DGU. But these read like fantasy team deals, not real life deals. 11 or 12 players in a multi-team trade? Please.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Nov 29, 2008 3:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
It’s fun to imagine.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 29, 2008 4:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
re:
the bigger question i have on that is this – I don’t kow if the Twins want to give up Blackburn right now without a solid replacement lined up. Their system pitching has been pushed up. There’s still a couple pieces (Swarzak perhaps) but nothing lined up at the top at the moment.
by toonsterwu on Nov 29, 2008 5:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know the Twins depth chart well enough
to know who they’d prefer to trade besides Bonser. Any suggestions on where they stand with Baker, Perkins, etc.?
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 29, 2008 5:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
MN makes a lot of sense, but
can they fit both DeRo and Marquis into their budget? Seems the Cubs will have to eat some of Marquis’ contract. Also, if the Cubs are targeting Furcal, then perhaps Theriot is dealt to either SD or MN? Altogether, seems Hendry will wait for some movement in the free agent market before making the deal for Peavy…
SORIANO! YESSSSSSSS! JIMBO!!!
by CubFaninCA on Nov 29, 2008 6:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
How about Young to the Cubs??
I just can’t see Hendry paying $11 million for Giles when he could spend such money on Furcal.. I know Young isn’t the left-handed hitter outfielder the Cubs are looking for, but he has a cannon for RF. Perhaps this works for all 3, but this is contingent on the Cubs signing Furcal.
Cubs trade – DeRo, Pie, Marshall, Theriot, Marquis (pay 1/2 of his salary) & Vitters
Cubs get – Peavy & Young
MN trades – Blackburn & Young
MN gets – DeRo, Kouz & Marquis for half price
SD trades – Peavy & Kouz
SD gets – Pie, Theriot, Marshall, Vitters and Blackburn
Cubs lineup – Furcal, Fontenot, Soriano, ARam, Lee, Soto, Young & Fukudome
SORIANO! YESSSSSSSS! JIMBO!!!
by CubFaninCA on Nov 29, 2008 9:15 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Why would the Twins want both Kouz and DeRo?
"I've never complained about it. I'm thankful to have a jersey." Mark DeRosa, 22 Aug 2007
by DeRoMyHero on Nov 29, 2008 9:27 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
DeRo
plays 2b. They’re looking to add power.
SORIANO! YESSSSSSSS! JIMBO!!!
by CubFaninCA on Nov 29, 2008 10:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yet another fantasy league trade.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Nov 30, 2008 4:17 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Read the Gammons quote over at TCR
Suggesting that the Padres want Vitters and an arm, which leaves me befuddled (also leaves me befuddled that the sticking point with the Braves, at least according to Gammons, were Atlanta’s A ball arms, likely (my guess) Cole Rohrbough or Jeff Locke … I like both those arms but they shouldn’t be the breaking point to a deal).
Vitters and a quality arm? I don’t know what we are dealing off for a quality arm. I don’t think, for example, that Baltimore would swing a Z for Roberts/top arm type deal (which has been discussed on some Cub forums). Also, think about the scope of the deal. We are now talking about swing several pieces for a solid arm, dealing Vitters, said arm, and perhaps another piece or two (Cedeno?Pie?) for Peavy. This is getting quite large.
The one team that comes to mind right now – maybe the Yankees deal Hughes (and more) if we fork over a veteran arm, but again, swapping Peavy for one of Z/Lilly/Harden doesn’t really improve things that much, if at all. There’s some more, but it surprises me that they want Vitters, with Headley/Kouzmanoff lined up at third, Gonzalez/Blanks at first, and Vitters likely not a fit for Petco in the OF.
I still think Wren will get back into it unless Atlanta surprises everyone and pulls off a Burnett or Lowe signing, neither of which is expected right now.
by toonsterwu on Nov 29, 2008 5:10 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Vitters surprises me, too.
That’s why I wondered if the three-team deal sends Vitters or Kouz elsewhere, which led me to the Twins.
As for swapping one of Z/Lilly/Harden for Peavy, I actually think Peavy is better than all three of those pitchers. Harden has more upside, but more risk. We save significant dollars if it’s a Z/Peavy swap.
I can’t imagine Z accepting a trade to Charm City.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 29, 2008 5:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Swapping Kouz for Vitters makes sense for SD,
since they’re building for down the road. Perhaps Marshall goes to MN to replace whatever pitcher they send to SD…
SORIANO! YESSSSSSSS! JIMBO!!!
by CubFaninCA on Nov 29, 2008 7:02 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 

















