Bruce Levine: Hendry talking with Padres
On ESPN 1000, i just heard that Hendry has been talking with the Padres about Jake Peavy.
I have not heard this with my own ears, but I have read on several different websites that the it was also reported on ESPN 1000 that the Padres want Ceda, Marshall, Pie, and Cedeno.
If that is the deal, Hendry would be crazy to not jump all over it. It gives the Padres 3 MLB ready players, but I still don't see how they can consider that enough.
Can anyone confirm if they heard this?
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
3 recs |
222 comments
Comments
Hmmm
I wonder if they threw Harden in the deal if that could perhaps get it done.
Then again a Rotation of Z, Peavy, Harden, Lilly and Marquis would be just unfair
by Galvan316 on Nov 3, 2008 11:36 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
The Padres are desperate to trade him if they would take that ESPN 1000 package
If we can resign Dempster and get Peavy then Harden can go in the deal if needed.
Your 2008 Missouri Tigers! #14 6-2 (2-2). Next up at Baylor. Chase Coffman is a god.
by nji232 on Nov 3, 2008 11:41 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
no way ...
Peavy and Dempster are Cubs next year — unless Dempster gives a ridiculous discount to the Cubs.
And that won’t happen.
by elgato on Nov 3, 2008 11:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well then I don't agree with including Harden in a Peavy deal
Harden + Dempster > Peavy IMO
Your 2008 Missouri Tigers! #14 6-2 (2-2). Next up at Baylor. Chase Coffman is a god.
by nji232 on Nov 3, 2008 11:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Include Harden in the deal for Peavy?
No thanks: Harden > Peavy
by uwbadger on Nov 3, 2008 11:43 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Hmm
Harden (Career) 6 Years
41 -20 3.23 ERA 1.21 WHIP
Peavy (Career) 7 Years
86-62 3.25 ERA 1.18 WHIP
Id know Peavy had an Injury at one point in his Career and Harden is a walking DL stint. If It was me. Id try and Retract that Haden > Peavy statement.
by Galvan316 on Nov 3, 2008 11:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
No thanks
Look where Peavy pitches – the best pitchers park in the major leagues, his ERA is going to be skewed downward.
Career
Peavy 3.50 FIP
Harden 3.41 FIP
Peavy 8.96 K/9
Harden 8.99 K/9
They have similar LD, GB, Peavy edge in BB/9, Harden has lower BABIP, lower OBA, lower HR/9, better career ERA+, Harden a year younger.
I’d say they are pretty much the same pitcher, and Harden was healthy last year. Peavy is up near the top of PAP every year as well.
We have Harden under a cheap contract and don’t have to give up Pie, Cedeno, Marshall, et al to get him. So no, I won’t retract that statement.
by uwbadger on Nov 4, 2008 12:19 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe not that
however, giving up Harden to get Peavy along with the loss of Marshall doesn’t seem to make too much sense, since much of this is a way for Hendry to be in a CYA mode if Dempster leaves.
Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.
by blackhawk24 on Nov 4, 2008 7:06 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
A deal for Peavy would make sense if the Cubs don't plan on keeping
Dempster. I would hope that the Cubs would seriously look at moving Marquis also. His salary is quite high for a fifth starter and roster has enough arms to fill the fifth spot.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Nov 3, 2008 11:51 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Or if they think he'll walk because
someone else gives him big bucks.
I’d rather the Cubs make FA signings because it doesn’t cost bodies. But if they can swing the Peavy deal – maybe with a 3rd team – and not give up Marshall, I’d be all for it.
My guess is just past 50-50, Demp is a goner. There’s just so many teams that are w/o good starting pitching and he’s gonna get a 60/4 offer.
Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.
by blackhawk24 on Nov 4, 2008 7:19 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
I think the chances of Demp being on the Cubs opening day roster are slim and none. And slim is packing his bags.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Nov 4, 2008 8:18 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think you're both wrong.
There is an alarming tendency starting up here to take every breathless rumor as if it’s going to happen rightfreakingnow, which in most cases, it never does.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Nov 4, 2008 8:34 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not basing my opinion on tany rumor. I didn't even read Levine's story. I just have a feeling that
Demp is going to end up somewhere else and the salary number that would go to him will go to some other player. It’s just a hunch, but I don’t see him in a Cub uniform next year.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Nov 4, 2008 8:45 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If we could dump Marquis...
could we not resign Demp as well. We’d be taking one hell of a chance, but I wouldn’t mind a Peavy, Demp, Z, Harden, Lilly rotation. Actually the thought of that excites me quite a bit.
But to this point, I like Demp and everything, but if its true he is going to get in excess of $15M per, I think I’d rather swing this Peavy deal. Like everyone else is saying though, losing Marshall would be a negative.
by jbertram on Nov 4, 2008 9:02 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That would be a dream rotation, but I really don't
see the Cubs committing that much salary to the pitching staff. I think you could move Marquis and use his salary number plus Demp’s number to sign another pitcher, but you really would like to have a pitcher like Marshall in the rotation to keep the salary committment to the staff lower.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Nov 4, 2008 9:18 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with the moving Marquis part of your theory.
His salary isn’t that much out of line with guys like him (inning-eaters who can pitch at league average), and both of his hometown teams could use him. If I were Hendry, I’d definitely explore that; it could clear $10 million off the payroll, allowing other moves to be made.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Nov 4, 2008 9:23 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
He’s going to need some wiggle room and moving Marquis would give him that. Crane Kenney has already stated what the salary target is for the team and if Hendry wants to add another LH bat and/or a leadoff hitter, he’s going to need some salary space. Marquis has value and moving him makes sense.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Nov 4, 2008 9:29 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
like trading DLee?
when he has a no-trade-clause in his contract, and as far as I know has given no indication he’s unhappy with the Cubs or lving in Chicago?
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
by ballhawk on Nov 4, 2008 11:11 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Which breathless rumor?
The Peavy one, where there’s been reports on that almost every day for a week+? Or the Dempster leaving rumor, where he couldn’t wait to file for FA? Then state it’s not a slam dunk he’d be back and on top of that, said he won’t negotiate with the Cubs until after he hears offers?
I don’t think it’s going to happen with Peavy as much as I believe it’s due diligence for Hendry to be exploring that if Demp does leave. Hell, explore it even if he doesn’t leave.
Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.
by blackhawk24 on Nov 4, 2008 11:41 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I find it simply amazing
How people can just crap on some players sometimes.
Example: “LETS TRADE SORIANO HE SUCKS…Blah blah blah”
Uh, okay you want to get rid of a guy who hit 30 homers for you? Sure thing
Example 2: “ID RATHER HAVE DEMPSTER THEN JAKE PEAVY!!!”
Just because Dempster is a nice guy doesnt mean he’s going to have 2008 seasons the rest of his career
Example 3: “WHY GIVE SO AND SO THIS CONTRACT!?!?!”
Why do you care? are you writing the checks? Is it your money the Cubs are spending? Would you not go to games because of a players contract?
Its little comments like these that really make me sit back and think to myself…. Do we really want to win a title or are we just content with the loveable losers label?
by Galvan316 on Nov 4, 2008 12:07 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I just sat back and thought to myself.....
….that you really should find more substantial things to sit back and think about.
The reality is, is that the Cubs are a business and on the verge of new ownership and the Cubs just won’t be spending like they have in the past, this winter so I think most Cub fans that are aware of that, are using that mindset when considering what moves the Cubs should make.
Over time, your quickness with a cocky rejoinder must have gotten you many punches in the face - Al Swearengen
by lemon20pie on Nov 4, 2008 12:54 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Only...
your first example makes sense. In Example 2 it’s not a straight this or that option. To have Dempster means that the team also has Pie, Ceda, Hill, Marshall, Cedeno, or whoever else would have gone the other way. Would you rather the Cubs have signed Furcal 3 years ago or traded for Pierre?
In Example 3…um, it is my money the Cubs are spending. I buy tickets (revenue), T-shirts (revenue), concessions (revenue). While my yearly contribution to the team might be less than $500 I would rather they spend it wisely instead of just saying…“give him an extra $2mil. He didn’t ask for it? Who cares, it’s not our money we’re spending.”
by CubFan81 on Nov 4, 2008 9:57 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
this is crap....
the article says pie cedeno and others…. if we could get peavy for that it would be done….
I pray we can do that….
"I played with one of the best pitchers in history, Greg Maddux," Zambrano said"
by fischisgod on Nov 4, 2008 12:53 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Agreed.
It’ll take much more than that. Remember, Ceda was traded (handed) to the Cubs for Todd Friggen Walker. Have the Padres and their scouts’ minds changed that much about the guy in 2 seasons to accept him as the main piece in a trade for their ace? Me thinks not.
It’s silly to even for a second believe that is all it’d take to get Peavy. How does someone get away with reporting that?
Over time, your quickness with a cocky rejoinder must have gotten you many punches in the face - Al Swearengen
by lemon20pie on Nov 4, 2008 12:59 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
EDIT: Ceda was traded to the Cubs from the Padres for Todd Friggen Walker
Over time, your quickness with a cocky rejoinder must have gotten you many punches in the face - Al Swearengen
by lemon20pie on Nov 4, 2008 1:03 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
much more?
this package looks pretty similar to what the Twins got for Johan.
Pie = Gomez…Pie with more offensive upside
Marshall = Humber…Marshall I would argue is more valuable.
Ceda = Kevin Mulvey
Cedeno = Deolis Guerra…just because who the hell is Deolis Guerra?
In fact, you could argue the Cubs package is better than what the Twins received, as Carlos Gomez offense is never going to be very good, and Pie may not be as fast but is most likely just as good a defender. Marshall has quietly been very good the past two years, I don’t see why Humber would be considered to have more value. Mulvey is nothing special, maybe you could give him a slight edge if he projects to be a starter. Cedeno is major league ready, while Guerra is far from a guaranteed major league player.
bring up felix.
by kylejo on Nov 4, 2008 7:45 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Deolis Guerra was a good pitching prospect
with upside. He didn’t play that well last year, if I recall correctly, but, still, his value was high.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 4, 2008 8:17 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
really?
5.47 era, 1.67 whip in high A? granted the kid was just 19 this past year, but 71 k’s to 71 bb’s in 120 innings doesn’t look too hot.
lets say he’s more valuable in a trade than cedeno just for arguments sake, do you think the packages are that far off?
bring up felix.
by kylejo on Nov 4, 2008 8:29 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Guerra is all projection and no stats to back it up yet.
As you pointed out, he’s still a teenager.
I think the Cubs’ package has to be better than the Twins package, because the Mets were getting one year with less competition among potential landing places. I think the Cubs can match the Johan package, but whether or not they can meet a Peavy package depends on how Towers values the Cub trade chips. Let me give you three examples:
Tyler Colvin – some people could look at him and give him no value; others might look at his potential and what he did this last year and be excited.
Mike Fontenot – some people could see the second coming of Marcus Giles; others could see Chase Utley Lite.
Ryan Theriot – some people could see the IF version of Scott Podsednik; others could see David Eckstein (and like that).
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 4, 2008 8:37 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i guess you are right
that it’s unfair to say a package for peavy should equal the package for johan.
bring up felix.
by kylejo on Nov 4, 2008 9:16 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That's a good point about the years....
but I think we can all agree that there is an abundance of morons here now.
Mario Kart Wii -- April 27th!
by TheBeerBaron on Nov 4, 2008 11:04 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Not necessarily.
Getting Peavy wasn’t one of Jim Hendry’s original goals. Originally, he hoped just to re-sign Demp. Hendry probably planned to put his trade chips down on different tables for different players. So, there may be a nice offer out there for Peavy that Hendry can’t take immediately without thinking through his other options. He can’t just keep spending away, so he may have to see if he can unload one of his NTC players first.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 4, 2008 1:12 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i hope you are right
me personally i would rather give up the deal of Ceda Marshall Pie and Cedeno and let Demps walk…
I think lemon is an idiot in that the doesnt like Ceda… I think a lot of people are high on him. He is one of the reasons i dont want to sign Wood either…. As of right now here is my offseason plan
Offer ARB to Wood and Demps (if they accept great we have no risk and if not then we get four picks)
DO NOT offer arb to Howry he will accept and he sucked
Get Peavy….. We can do it. We have a very short window and if he is healthy i say we get rid of the WHOLE farm to aquire a cy young winner. Peavy Z Harden Lilly and Marqui/other = wow…..
Sign Abreu he is what we need….
Give Marmol a huge raise but dont make him the closer. He is too valuable in late situations to give us only three outs….
Vote McCain.. Or go out and vote…. God bless prosperity for this country
-I bleed cubbie blue :)
"I played with one of the best pitchers in history, Greg Maddux," Zambrano said"
by fischisgod on Nov 4, 2008 1:18 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
How many times have you seen Ceda pitch, jackass?
I’ve seen him pitch many times and I’ve always compared him to Roberto Novoa….Someone who can bring it but just doesn’t know where it’ll end up. He might be able to get away with that green shit down in the Minors, but NEVER will be able to at the MLB level. Because of that and despite some of his impressive numbers he’s put up in the Minors, he’s not that much more of a prospect than he was when the Cubs got him. HE’s another classic case of Idiotic Cub fans, such as yourself, overhyping a Cubs prospect.
Also, I’m not the one even for a second believing that it’s possible that the Cubs could start the season with Dempster, Wood and Peavy on the same roster. That is just a hilarious pipedream. Who’s the idiot now?
Over time, your quickness with a cocky rejoinder must have gotten you many punches in the face - Al Swearengen
by lemon20pie on Nov 4, 2008 1:32 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
rading comprehension has never been your strong part
i say offer arb to Wood and demps.. they wont accept..
2. people love ceda he is not novoa that make s u retarded….
I wish you could read
"I played with one of the best pitchers in history, Greg Maddux," Zambrano said"
by fischisgod on Nov 4, 2008 2:00 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sure the Cubs have the money
to get Abreu, Peavy, and keep Wood, especially if the Peavy deal requires us taking on Greene’s contract, too. So, if we trade all our goodies for Peavy, how do we get our RF if we can’t buy him and have nothing left to trade for him?
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 4, 2008 1:55 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Greene's contract
$6,500,000 and 2009 is the last of it. Not exactly a “word beater”. Hell, Giles’ $9,000,000, one year left (if the Padres decide to pick up the option, which they would if they trade him) might be enticing. He’s no longer “Brian Giles”, but he hits left handed and he’ll draw a lot of walks.
Mario Kart Wii -- April 27th!
by TheBeerBaron on Nov 4, 2008 11:10 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i want peavy and abreu
no wood and demps
"I played with one of the best pitchers in history, Greg Maddux," Zambrano said"
by fischisgod on Nov 4, 2008 2:01 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Wasn't the Peavy thing mentioned
earlier that one of the writers thought it would be a Hendry-engineered 3-way deal? Or was that a different player? Perhaps Hendry is trying to find the pieces SD wants by getting a 3rd team involved. Look what he did at the ’04 deadline to get Nomar; that was a 4-way and minutes before the deadline.
Sweet Lou for Mayor in '11.
by blackhawk24 on Nov 4, 2008 7:08 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Peavy has added the Angels and Yankees to his list.....
I saw it on espn this morning on that bottom line scrolling thing…..though he still prefers his 5 team NL list.
Do we really even need this guy?
Okay, just so I understand it... in your wildest fantasy, you are in hell. And you are co-running a bed and breakfast with the devil.
by bren on Nov 4, 2008 8:04 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
That should be the end of talk about him coming to the Cubs then
If he had to expand his list to AL teams, means that no deal could be reached with the NL teams.
Your 2008 Missouri Tigers! #14 6-2 (2-2). Next up at Baylor. Chase Coffman is a god.
by nji232 on Nov 4, 2008 8:14 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It's not the end.
Peavy has expanded his list, but we don’t know that Towers has gotten good offers from those two teams. It could be a negotiating tactic to get Hendry or Wren to step up their timing.
That said, the Angels can give the Padres just what they’re looking for.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 4, 2008 8:19 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well if it is just a ploy to get more out of Hendry
What the heck are they asking for? Aside from Vitters do we really have a prospect we wouldn’t trade?
Obviously a negotiating ploy with the Braves makes sense.
Your 2008 Missouri Tigers! #14 6-2 (2-2). Next up at Baylor. Chase Coffman is a god.
by nji232 on Nov 4, 2008 8:25 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I wish I knew what they are asking for.
We do have players they could like. Either Theriot or Fontenot could be perceived as significant trade chips or they could also be perceived as fluff. I wish I knew what the Padres wanted.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 4, 2008 8:39 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If we agreed to take back Greene, then sending Theriot wouldn't be a big deal
Yeah I know Greene has an awful contract and sucks at hitting, but I think we can get away with him in our lineup.
Your 2008 Missouri Tigers! #14 6-2 (2-2). Next up at Baylor. Chase Coffman is a god.
by nji232 on Nov 4, 2008 8:46 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree...
…I am sure Towers has asked Peavy to loosen the public image of where he would go for one reason – to help with Tower’s negotiating power with the teams Peavy really wants to go to.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
by MPH73 on Nov 4, 2008 8:52 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Told you so...
Just as soon as the Yankees say they are willing to rip up Peavy’s existing contract and start anew his list of preferable teams magically expands.
"Listen, if you start worrying about the people in the stands, before too long you're up in the stands with them." -- Tommy Lasorda
by MDBNIU on Nov 4, 2008 9:17 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Cashman has been holding on to his prospects though...
He wouldnt give up Hughes or Kennedy, Tabata or Jackson for Santana, so would he do so for Peavy? I doubt it, his mantra has been to turn around that franchise and focus more on homegrown talent, rather than giving them away for vets……but Lil Steinbrenner might flip that strategy around.
Okay, just so I understand it... in your wildest fantasy, you are in hell. And you are co-running a bed and breakfast with the devil.
by bren on Nov 4, 2008 10:11 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Don't forget that the Yankees didn't make the post season last year for the first time in a
loooooong time. They have a new ball park an impatient owners. Mantras can change.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Nov 4, 2008 10:17 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Right...
But I think theyre relying on a Sabathia/Wang/Joba/Pettitte/Hughes rotation and that Jackson kid is their CF of the future….and CC has proved he can hack it in the AL
Like Ive said before, if Peavy sticks to his guns and the Braves hold onto their blue chippers, we have a chance.
Okay, just so I understand it... in your wildest fantasy, you are in hell. And you are co-running a bed and breakfast with the devil.
by bren on Nov 4, 2008 10:22 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Steinbrenner boys are runnin' the show now
Cashman is merely a pawn in executing orders handed down these days. He’s been neutered in the Yankee organization.
"Listen, if you start worrying about the people in the stands, before too long you're up in the stands with them." -- Tommy Lasorda
by MDBNIU on Nov 4, 2008 11:10 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think he would have re-upped had he been neutered
In fact, Hal Steinbrenner is a big supporter of him, and I think that helps to balance out Hank.
I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg
by Trey2317 on Nov 4, 2008 12:19 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well...
I have strong feeling the Yankees are going to make some humongous moves this offseason. Heck, they might wind up with CC Sabathia, AJ Burnett, Manny Ramirez and Mark Texiera. Hank and Hal have said the checkbook is open for business and that not making the playoffs is completely unacceptable. With their new cash cow stadium coming on line they could goose their payroll up to $250 million according to some people.
"Listen, if you start worrying about the people in the stands, before too long you're up in the stands with them." -- Tommy Lasorda
by MDBNIU on Nov 4, 2008 12:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd agree with that
but I don’t think that’s a sign of Cashman’s neutering. I think the Yankees realized they need increased depth, especially in the starting rotation, which is leading them to spend money.
Cashman will spend the money, as he always as, in the manner he thinks is best for the franchise. Plus, the emphasis on player development is continuing, which is what he’s always emphasized.
I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg
by Trey2317 on Nov 4, 2008 12:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You're exactly right
and furthermore, the Yankees are not necessarily matches with the Padres. Why would they, who have $$$ to burn on CC, Burnett, and anyone else they want, throw their young players away? They’ve only got so many rotation spots open.
It’s the Angels that make things more difficult.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 4, 2008 1:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Peavy interest is nothing more than contingency planning by Hendry
People are getting way carried away with this rumor. Apparently Ryan Dempster is not willing to sign early and at discount. And who can blame him in this hyper crazy world for quality pitching. In response Jim Hendry is exploring other options should the pricetag to bring Dempster back be too much.
Like I’ve been saying for weeks Ryan Dempster is going to have zero problem getting a 4 year contract in the $50 million plus range. In fact he may have no problem getting a 5 year deal in the $70 million range.
"Listen, if you start worrying about the people in the stands, before too long you're up in the stands with them." -- Tommy Lasorda
by MDBNIU on Nov 4, 2008 9:15 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I agree that acquiring Peavy is the longest of long shots, but I wouldn't rule out
the Cubs pursuing another starter. I don’t think signing Demp is a slam dunk and if he leaves, the Cubs will need another starter. I dont think they are ready to plug Marshall into the rotation and have Marquis as the #4 starter. I can see them trying to find another arm to take Demp’s spot.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Nov 4, 2008 9:23 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think most people here agree it's a longshot
but that doesn’t mean it’s not worth talking about.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 4, 2008 1:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Of couse it's worth talking about. If we didn't talk about stuff like this, would just
go around tell each other to pound sand.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Nov 4, 2008 2:01 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
And some of us do that anyway!
"I see I'm not the only one around here who can't hold his water." - Last words of the leaky pipe in the visiting team dugout, Dodger Stadium, October 4, 2008.
by dat cubfan daver on Nov 4, 2008 3:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree...
…Hendry’s first priority would be to resign Dempster for a reasonable amount, so the Peavy trade would not be necessary. Since Dempster is going to shop the open market, Hendry has to at least appear that he is doing the same with Peavy. In the end, the Peavy talk is as much to show Dempster the Cubs have other options as well. I still doubt a Peavy deal will get done with the Cubs, and if it did, I don’t see them spending additional money on Dempster.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
by MPH73 on Nov 4, 2008 9:31 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Dempster will eventually sign with the Cubs in my estimation
…and I shall cringe at the contract because I bet it is in the neighborhood of 4 years at $60 million.
Jake Peavy? He’s not coming to the Cubs. This is smokescreen and contingency planning by Hendry. Nothing more. There are other pitching starved teams around baseball that can give San Diego a lot more than Felix Flippin Pie, Sean Marshall and Jose Ceda.
"Listen, if you start worrying about the people in the stands, before too long you're up in the stands with them." -- Tommy Lasorda
by MDBNIU on Nov 4, 2008 9:36 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You may be 100% correct, but anytime a player tests the market, there's always the
chance some idiot owner will be willing to overpay to get him.(see Soriano) In the end this Peavy talk is probably just that, talk, but I wouldn’t call it outside the realm of all possibilities to see Demp in some other uniform next year.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Nov 4, 2008 9:41 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree.
Unexpected signings happen every offseason. Did anyone predict Tori Hunter signing with the Angels last year for $90 million?
It wil be interesting to see the approach teams take with the economic uncertainty they are facing.
Hey, it's a new century!
by cowsarecool220 on Nov 4, 2008 10:26 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
if Demp asks for 3 or 4 years I say goodbye sir
Every player should be accorded the privilege of at least one season with the Chicago Cubs. That's baseball as it should be played - in God's own sunshine. And that's really living."
by DC Cubbie on Nov 4, 2008 6:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Do you seriously think he'd ask for less than that?
"I see I'm not the only one around here who can't hold his water." - Last words of the leaky pipe in the visiting team dugout, Dodger Stadium, October 4, 2008.
by dat cubfan daver on Nov 5, 2008 10:49 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
With whom do you propose replacing him?
"I've never complained about it. I'm thankful to have a jersey." Mark DeRosa, 22 Aug 2007
by DeRoMyHero on Nov 5, 2008 11:12 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You could replace him from within
Marshall or Gaudin
or you could replace him via FA
Lowe
There are several options available to Hendry. However, he has to weigh whether one option limits him from doing other things with the team. If he chooses to use Marshall or Gaudin, then that could limit his trade prospects. If he chooses to resign Demp, it could limit his FA signings for the lineup. Since we don’t have any insight to their plans, all we can do is speculate. Either way, the Dempster Decision is the biggest decision of the Offseason since it directly or indirectly affects all of the other decisions.
"Sports are a crazy business. If there was a template, we'd all be champions, right? But there's one winner and 29 or 30 losers; one guy wins, everybody else is tied for last. That's the way it works" -- Mark Cuban
by TheRiot Police on Nov 5, 2008 11:19 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And you think Lowe will ask for less years than Dempster?
Three or four years, preferably 3 with a mutual 4th year option, would be just fine with me for Dempster.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Nov 5, 2008 1:22 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree.
It’s unrealistic to think he’d ask for any less and maybe he’d consider the option year part of his hometown discount.
"I see I'm not the only one around here who can't hold his water." - Last words of the leaky pipe in the visiting team dugout, Dodger Stadium, October 4, 2008.
by dat cubfan daver on Nov 5, 2008 1:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Supposedly, Lowe wants 3 years
From the Trib:
One possibility to replace Dempster, or even to be added if he returns, is Dodgers free agent Derek Lowe. He would be perfect for Wrigley Field with his sinkerball and at 35 reportedly wants only a three-year deal and to play for a team with a chance to win the World Series.
“I think he’s open to winning franchises,” agent Scott Boras said when asked specifically about the Cubs. “He’s got a [championship] ring on his finger [with Boston] already, but he wants to be on a club that is in the hunt.”
Sounds like an offer to him could be similar to Dempster’s.
I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg
by Trey2317 on Nov 5, 2008 1:41 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't really know...
I suspect that he will want four guaranteed years but who really knows. If Lowe wants 3 years/15 mil and Dempster wants 4 to 5 years at 15mil you have to at least entertain the thought of Lowe if you think his performance/team fit would be on par with Dempster.
"Sports are a crazy business. If there was a template, we'd all be champions, right? But there's one winner and 29 or 30 losers; one guy wins, everybody else is tied for last. That's the way it works" -- Mark Cuban
by TheRiot Police on Nov 5, 2008 2:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You can get Peavy
in a deal that incudes Khalil Greene. I can see…4 for 2. Peavy, Greene, possibly a draft pick — for a deal that includes Marshall, Theriot/Cedeno, Pie and Kevin Hart. I’d think the Pads would need 2-3 pitchers and a SS. Even Marquis could be a possible throw-in, as much salary would be shed with the departure of Peavy/Greene. I can see Kevin Towers looking for a guy who can give them innings, a guy with experience. His salary would then fit into the frugal plans of the Padres, and it’s only for the last year of his contract.
Hendry has always coveted Greene, and I’m assuming a change of scenery would revitalize his career. The kid was so messed up last year…but he still has the best arm and glove at SS I’ve seen in years.
I thought a deal with the Padres was pure whimsy until the past few days when Towers implied moving Greene was probable. This is one way it could happen.
by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Nov 4, 2008 9:40 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Interesting...
…and I would add, Marquis could be a pretty productive pitcher throwing half his games at Petco.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
by MPH73 on Nov 4, 2008 9:44 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Why would the Padres want Marquis?
The reason they may be willing to trade Peavy is they are rebuilding. They are looking for young talent in return, particularly Peavy’s replacement, a future ace pitcher.
Hey, it's a new century!
by cowsarecool220 on Nov 4, 2008 10:29 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I would depend on what else they have...
…but while they rebuild, they still need adequate pitchers to go out and eat innings, and I imagine they won’t be doing that with all young guys.
You could be right and they don’t want him, but if they want to peddle Greene along with Peavy, it may be a trade off they would be willing to take.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
by MPH73 on Nov 4, 2008 10:41 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The Padres are the rumored destination for all the rehabbers hoping to get another contract next year.
So, I don’t think they’re in the market for veteran innings.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 4, 2008 2:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
They need arms.
If Peavy goes…..Chris Young is their only dependable veteran starter. Marquis would be a good fit for a year. When Cha Seung Baek is suddenly your #2, Jason Marquis doesn’t look so awful. The rest of the starting rotation — save any scrap heap pick-ups, will be young. That’s where Marshall comes in, as their #2. Marquis becomes their #3 immediately.
by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Nov 4, 2008 12:27 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Thae Nationals have proved
you can duct tape together a rotation when a team is rebuilding.
The Padres will be bad with Marquis and bad without, so what is the difference? $10 million.
Hey, it's a new century!
by cowsarecool220 on Nov 4, 2008 1:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
plus, Marquis is off the books after 1 year
and will likely be a type B, which will net them a draft pick
by philadelphiacub on Nov 4, 2008 1:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Why would they want to take Marquis?
Just because it’s an expiring contract? So is Khalil Greene’s and Greene is only making $6.5M in 2009. Giles’ option can be picked up for $9M and traded, or they can buy his option out at $3M. Why wouldn’t they resign Giles and try to trade him to the Cubs too? That would make more sense than Greene.
They avoid the $3M sunk cost on the buyout. Towers might even research this possiblity if it were just Giles for some 2nd-3rd tier prospects from the Cubs without Peavy.
Mario Kart Wii -- April 27th!
by TheBeerBaron on Nov 4, 2008 1:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You trade Marquis because you could clear $10M off your payroll. If you have
pitchers on your roster that can perform like he can, move him and rid youself of his salary.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Nov 4, 2008 1:33 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That a pretty good trade
for both teams. Jim – go to work.
Cubs Win!! Cubs Win!
by Ihatethecards on Nov 4, 2008 9:46 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It could happen
I generally like Greene. As an interesting side note on him, he is BaHai, so the North Side might be pretty cool for him.
Realistically though… If Greene comes in, does Theriot become expendable? Does he move to 2B with DeRosa splitting time in RF with Fukudome if he rebounds?
If theriot is in the deal, do the Cubs need to push hard for a trade for a lead off man since Theriot is the most logical in house replacement for Soriano in that slot?
Eamus Ursuli!
by WGNstatic on Nov 4, 2008 9:46 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If the Cubs saw Theriot as a leadoff man
we wouldn’t be reading rumors about them seeking a lead-off man.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 4, 2008 2:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
This is nuts
My goodness people, there are a bunch of legitimate contender teams out there with SCREAMING need for starting pitching and therefore be willing to give up several PREMIUM young talents to get him.
Your post is yet another example of dazzling a ballclub you view as appreciative farm system of the Cubs with a crapload of QUANTITY as opposed to true premium quality. Peavy has already caved on the list of teams he is willing to be traded for. The Braves, Brewers, Yankees, Red Sox, Angels, Dodgers, Phillies, Mets are just some of the teams I can think of who will go full tilt after Peavy if provided the green light by the Padres.
You are pissin’ in the wind if you think mass quantities of Marshall, Cedeno, Pie, Hart, etc. coupled with our “willingness” to take on Khalil Greene gets a trade done.
"Listen, if you start worrying about the people in the stands, before too long you're up in the stands with them." -- Tommy Lasorda
by MDBNIU on Nov 4, 2008 10:09 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Blue Mike is right
I don’t see any way the Cubs can put together nearly enough of a package to get Peavy. To call Cedeno,Pie,etc. “major league ready” is a gigantic stretch. Ready for what?? If it’s to be a 5th outfielder and a backup IF maybe so but me thinks the Pads would need a lot more than our crap to give up a great pitcher like him.
We can all salivate over a dream rotation with Peavy in it and that would make for another great regular season but it still does not address the issues with the everyday lineup that need to be solved this offseason.
by plenz on Nov 4, 2008 11:10 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
As I said some time ago
I expected the Braves to be the appropriate trading partner for the Padres. I’ve read recently (locally) that the Braves are now not as eager to unload some of their promising OF talent. The Padres want to deal Peavy badly. A trade will happen. That’s why the Cubs now, become a player in this endeavour. I didn’t believe the Cubs had a chance, until about a week ago.
So, my thoughts are one way the deal gets done. It’s speculation, not fact.
by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Nov 4, 2008 12:33 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
+ 10
Ain’t no way the Cubs have enough prospects for a Peavy trade. Of all of them, Marshall is the one pitcher the Cubs have GOT to hold on to. That’s doubly true if they don’t sign Dempster and don’t land Sabathia or another quality starter. At that point we are direly and urgently going to need Marshall for consideration in the rotation next spring.
I want to believe Dempster will want to stick around, but not for anything less than 3 years and ubermillions and I don’t think the Cubs will do so with Zell on the throne.
Well, Next Year is here .. and Jack's century's gotta end some time .. GO CUBBIES!
by cubnational on Nov 4, 2008 9:21 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks so much for
that enlightening dissertation, Blue Mike. As usual, any deal “we” might come up with is speculation. Obviously, as you have proven time and time again, your ‘speculation’ is certainly always, spot-on.
by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Nov 4, 2008 12:29 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Agreed
I think the vast majority of us scoffed when the initial list of 5 teams he would accept a trade to included the Cubs.
The fact though that other teams have clearly fallen off the radar (St. Louis and Houston) combined with the fact that the Padres will be quite reluctant to send him to LA, makes this interesting. I don’t see anyone printing Peavy Cub jerseys, but where there is smoke there is fire.
If the Cubs system was as devoid of talent that SD thought was both worthwhile and potentially available as suggested by BlueMike they wouldn’t even be wasting their time talking.
Eamus Ursuli!
by WGNstatic on Nov 4, 2008 1:39 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
This drumbeat is a repeat of last year
The O’s have to trade Roberts to the Cubs because no one else is that interested. There is the option that the Padres can keep Peavy.
by rlpete on Nov 4, 2008 1:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
There is indeed that option.
But there are a number of odd things here. The Padres seem overeager to get this deal done (which has me worried about injuries); and other teams have been eliminated but the Cubs have not. That’s odd. Consider that the Astros have a decent C prospect in Towles, who they might actually trade, but they’ve been ruled out while the Cubs have not.
Prospect beauty is in the eye of the beholder and if Towers covets, say, Mike Fontenot’s .900 OPS, that may keep the Cubs in it, even as the rest of us wonder why.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 4, 2008 2:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Agree
goodness Peavy is an elite starter in baseball, and the Cubs are going to offer scraps that fell on the floor. To get this done the Padres would want either Marmol or Spellcheck in the package to start.
Spellcheck, Pie, Marshall and two other prospects for Peavy and Greene.
"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"
by Grockcubs on Nov 4, 2008 4:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Samardzija has a no-trade clause
He’s going nowhere.
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Nov 4, 2008 8:15 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I say its all about the money. Trade
Fontenot, Theriot, Marshall, Hill, and Pie for Peavy, Giles, and Greene.Cubs eat up Pads major payroll and fill needs its a win-win for both teams.
Pads are cutting payroll and the pieces fit. Even though Pads seem like theyre getting nothing theyre cleaning over 20 mil in payroll….so take the Cubs package plus factor in the 20 mil and suddenly Towers has a good deal in his hands.
by Steve Sax on Nov 6, 2008 2:45 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Hill's value
I saw a comment on the mlbtraderumors site suggesting Hill’s name.
I don’t want to argue the merits of that site (I like it as a clearinghouse of thoughts, substantiated or not).
What is interesting though to me is Hill’s value. It certainly is no where near what it was a year ago of course. But, I could see him having some value as the 4th player in a deal.
How close do folks think a Pie, Cedeno, Marshall, Hill offering would come? My hunch is that it wouldn’t seem to be nearly enough. But, clearly that Cubs have some players that the Padres like, and that Hendry is willing to at least talk about or else the Cubs would have been relegated to the same outsider status as teams like the Cards and Astros.
Eamus Ursuli!
by WGNstatic on Nov 4, 2008 9:42 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
It's not enough. San Diego wants premium prospects, not Cub almost-was and never-will-be players.
I think any deal has to be sweeter than that.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Nov 4, 2008 9:45 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And most of the players listed are too close to arbitration
to make sense for the Padres. I would think the Padres are looking for MLB ready minor league talent or players that are in the 0-3 range (closer to the 0 than 3) that they could pay the minimum for a couple of years.
For instance, if the Padres were to talk to the Brewers, they wouldn’t be interested in JJ Hardy, they would be interested in Escobar, their up and coming shortstop with virtually no MLB service time. That is the type of player they are looking for.
Hey, it's a new century!
by cowsarecool220 on Nov 4, 2008 10:35 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Rich Hill
could definitely be a guy Towers might covet. It’s easy to wonder, from the outside, if Hill was a victim of Lou’s mangerial style. Of course, Hill doesn’t have a lot of objective trade value, but this is another case where Towers may have a number of Cubs “almost-was” players that he actually likes. Sometimes GMs take the deal that seems inferior to what other teams are offering. I know that last year’s Lidge trade was characterized that way.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 4, 2008 2:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Rich Hill is coveted by noone....
…..but a shrinking number of Cub fans who refuse to accept the reality of Rich Hill and that is that he has no future in MLB.
Over time, your quickness with a cocky rejoinder must have gotten you many punches in the face - Al Swearengen
by lemon20pie on Nov 4, 2008 2:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The Rays made a trade for a guy seemingly coveted by no one - Edwin Jackson.
He gave them 180 innings of quality pitching this year.
Teams are always looking for low-cost pitching options. I am not saying Hill is the key to getting Peavy. I’m not saying Hill has a lot of trade value. I’m saying I wouldn’t be surprised if some team somewhere valued him.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 4, 2008 3:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I can't see Towers wanting Hill as a lead in the deal,
but why wouldn’t he take him as a throw-in if he has 40 man roster space? It would be a one-year, “will a change of scenery help” gamble. Hill might be the 4th guy in the deal; the problem is coming up with the stud pitching prospect.
"I've never complained about it. I'm thankful to have a jersey." Mark DeRosa, 22 Aug 2007
by DeRoMyHero on Nov 4, 2008 6:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think that Pie, Cedeño, Marshall, and Hill would work.
For one thing, all four of those guys are out of options. Also, neither Marshall or Hill would be considered a future ace.
However, we know that Towers has liked Pie in the past, and that Petco has alleys that Carl Lewis couldn’t cover. We also know that Lou would prefer that he not be around, so it would make sense to include him.
We know that the Dads are trying to unload Khalil Greene, either with Peavy or seperately. I don’t think that they have a prime SS prospect. We also know that Ronny has spent a good deal of the last two years in Canine Hotel California, so it makes sense that Ronny Cedeño might be a throw-in. The only complicating issue is that Ronny is arb-eligible, but I would think that the Dads could handle $800K.
What the Cubs apparently lack is the stud pitching prospect that the Dads want. Spellcheck probably doesn’t meet the criteria because he is expensive and wearing the label “relief pitcher”. Similarly, Hart and Gaudin are thought of more as relievers who can spot-start, not potential aces. Donald Veal wouldn’t help, because he doesn’t project as a #1 or #2, he isn’t ready, and he will need to be on the 40 man roster, I think. But…
Hendry can get creative if Demp flees and Peavy’s importance becomes magnified. For instance, the Twins always have pitching prospects, and they are in desperate need of a 3B. Can DeRo supply the stud pitching prospect Hendry needs? The Yanks will need a front-line starter if they whiff on CC and/or Demp. Would they be interested in Lilly for a player (Canó?) and a pitching prospect like Kennedy?
I’m not saying that it would be easy to do. I’m not saying that it would be wise to give up current pieces of the puzzle. I’m just saying that it is possible.
"I've never complained about it. I'm thankful to have a jersey." Mark DeRosa, 22 Aug 2007
by DeRoMyHero on Nov 4, 2008 6:40 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If Peavy stays healthy...
Through July, just imagine how much higher his price could go….its interesting they’re trying to do this now….but he was on the DL this year, so perhaps theyre more worried about his elbow than the rest of the league knows.
Okay, just so I understand it... in your wildest fantasy, you are in hell. And you are co-running a bed and breakfast with the devil.
by bren on Nov 4, 2008 10:13 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
It's got more to do with the owner's pending divorce
They need to free up cash sooner rarher than later.
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Nov 4, 2008 4:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
MLB salaries are paid over the season
So from a financial management standpoint the Padres don’t have to get down to the $40 million salary target until the beginning of the 2009 season. The urgency to move Jake Peavy (and others) is prior to next season. Even Kevin Towers is smart enough to know an extreme bidding war can happen for Peavy.
"Listen, if you start worrying about the people in the stands, before too long you're up in the stands with them." -- Tommy Lasorda
by MDBNIU on Nov 4, 2008 4:13 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, that's a good point
I guess it depends on how desperate they are.
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Nov 4, 2008 4:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That would work against Towers.
Peavy has a NTC. That means that Towers can only work with his approved teams? If the Braves have fallen out of the race before July, and the Cubs suffer a major injury to Soto or RamÃrez that forces them to use their trade chips for a hitter, Towers won’t be able to trade him at all.
"I've never complained about it. I'm thankful to have a jersey." Mark DeRosa, 22 Aug 2007
by DeRoMyHero on Nov 4, 2008 6:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Greene
I can’t believe how much value are putting in this guy…why? Great glove/range aside, he couldn’t hit a watermelon with a 2 × 4!
Horrible hair too!
Demp and Rich: proof that people that live in igloos and say "eh" can contibute!
by Canadian Cubs Fan on Nov 4, 2008 10:18 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
He did have over 20 HRs a few years ago
So hes like our old Alex Gonzalez with a far better glove.
Okay, just so I understand it... in your wildest fantasy, you are in hell. And you are co-running a bed and breakfast with the devil.
by bren on Nov 4, 2008 10:20 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Actually, I think it is much more likely
if a trade is made between the Cubs and Padres, it will involve Greene rather than Peavy.
It does seem like all of this is pure speculation as I doubt Peavy will be traded before the Winter Meetings in Vegas at the beginning of December.
Hey, it's a new century!
by cowsarecool220 on Nov 4, 2008 10:37 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I believe the kid's been screwed up
by the Padres’ rotation of batting coaches, one after another. After period of time, he tuned everybody out and tried to fix himself. Nothing worked. So, in frustration, he smashes his hand. Now, the Padres want to subtract salary for time lost. That’s unbelievable. The union will never allow that. Think the Sox will do that to Carlos Quentin? He needs out of this atmosphere. His defense never suffered. He can be rescued.
by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Nov 4, 2008 12:37 PM CST up reply actions 2 recs
Rec'd
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 4, 2008 2:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
For some insight into the Padres' front office
I’d highly recommend reading Paul DePosdesta’s blog. He talks about trading Peavy (not in any great detail), how they’re looking to build the organization, etc.
I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg
by Trey2317 on Nov 4, 2008 10:39 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Key statement by DePodesta in that post
As far as Jake’s particular situation, we have him under contract for the next four years with an option for a fifth year. Our task, then, is to determine whether what we would receive in exchange for him would outweigh the benefits of having him for those five years (presumably some player(s) we would get in return could be of service for more than five years, so that needs to be factored in as well). Make no mistake, however – we place tremendous value on Jake’s presence here. That is why any offers for him in past years and every day up until this writing have been rejected.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Nov 4, 2008 10:43 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Which doesn't seem to bode well for the Cubs chances
If the Padres want controllable players for the next 5+ years. It would seem that the Braves system is a much better fit for a trade.
Unless other teams decided to hold on to their own prospects, opening the door for the Cubs, it would seem that re-signing Dempster would be a better way to address the rotation.
I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg
by Trey2317 on Nov 4, 2008 10:49 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Agree
and that’s why people can’t look at the Santana deal. People need to look more at the Haren deal. Even Bedard brought a starting CF’er who was a very high prospect, a closer and someone who is now one of the better pitching prospects in baseball.
As someone mentioned above, I see a Greene deal before I see a Peavy deal.
by rlpete on Nov 4, 2008 10:52 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Someone in their front office...
…has a blog? Jeez, between Towers freely shariing his discussions with Prior (when he was till Cub property) and this other guys blog, the Pads sure like transparancy in their front office. Must be a West coast thing.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
by MPH73 on Nov 4, 2008 10:44 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
How about....
…. a rotation of Z, Dempster, Harden, Peavy, Lilly….thats how you win a world series
by northpaw22k on Nov 4, 2008 10:53 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
With a rotation like that
you wouldn’t have to worry about picking up offense this offseason
by northpaw22k on Nov 4, 2008 10:54 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
With a rotation like that
you better have an owner with some deep pockets.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Nov 4, 2008 10:58 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That's the truth!
Hey, it's a new century!
by cowsarecool220 on Nov 4, 2008 10:59 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That's a bit unrealistic
Even big spending teams like the Yankees and Red Sox don’t have rotations like that. The Cubs won’t have all of 3 of Dempster, Harden and Peavy.
by rlpete on Nov 4, 2008 11:04 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
A productive offense helps to win a World Series, too.
Or so I’ve read.
"I see I'm not the only one around here who can't hold his water." - Last words of the leaky pipe in the visiting team dugout, Dodger Stadium, October 4, 2008.
by dat cubfan daver on Nov 4, 2008 1:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
well, you have to score at least 1 to win.
I think that’s in the rules (unless the other team forfeits out of fear of the rotation).
I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg
by Trey2317 on Nov 4, 2008 1:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Bruce Levine was just on ESPN 1000 and said pursuit of Peavy is legit
But that San Diego will explore all options for trading him in hopes of creating a bidding war. Levine also said Dempster’s agent thinks his client will have no problem getting a 5 year contract.
"Listen, if you start worrying about the people in the stands, before too long you're up in the stands with them." -- Tommy Lasorda
by MDBNIU on Nov 4, 2008 11:12 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
And that Ben Sheets will be target if Dempster walks and Peavy is traded elsewherer
"Listen, if you start worrying about the people in the stands, before too long you're up in the stands with them." -- Tommy Lasorda
by MDBNIU on Nov 4, 2008 11:13 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
We already have one...
…injury prone guy in Harden. Adding another one could be going back to the nightmare days we saw with the Wood/Prior injuries.
No thanks.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
by MPH73 on Nov 4, 2008 11:23 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Going after Sheets
would be just stupid. Pass on him.
by sue369 on Nov 4, 2008 12:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Sheets, I believe...
… wants to play for the Astros — he and Oswalt are friends.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Nov 4, 2008 12:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I believe that is Peavy's desired destination too
He and Oswalt are hunting buddies…
We already have Harden and we only have one Marshall. One of the central reason’s why we have Marquis and why we paid him what we did was because of the Wood/Prior mess of 06. If you include Sheets with Harden, you are tempting fate and trying to recreate history…I history I don’t really want to repeat.
"Sports are a crazy business. If there was a template, we'd all be champions, right? But there's one winner and 29 or 30 losers; one guy wins, everybody else is tied for last. That's the way it works" -- Mark Cuban
by TheRiot Police on Nov 4, 2008 12:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So is Ben and Carlos
According to Zambrano . . . .
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Nov 4, 2008 4:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
if the Cubs can get an under market value deal due to health
I am all for signing him. No reason not to take a flyer if he is going to come cheap. He is still one of the best pitchers in the game.
by uwbadger on Nov 4, 2008 12:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If the Cubs or anyone gets a market value on Peavy
It’ll simply be because of his backloaded contract that a rebuilding team like the Padres will want off their books, probably sooner than later. So, as usual, it won’t come down to who has the better prospects, it’s that who is also to give up better prospects than the Cubs and take on his enormous contract.
That’s the only hope the Cubs have in getting Peavy, that it seems they are willing to take on his contract too, not that they have better prospects,which we all know is not true.
Over time, your quickness with a cocky rejoinder must have gotten you many punches in the face - Al Swearengen
by lemon20pie on Nov 4, 2008 3:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
5 years?
…IMO, there are only a handful of pitchers I would guarantee 5 years to, and Dempster wouldn’t be on that list.
I would call it silly for any team to guarantee him 5 years. I could see 4, but 5 is a bit much.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
by MPH73 on Nov 4, 2008 11:21 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Never underestimate the stupidity of a Major League Baseball owner. If an owner is looking for
a top-flight pitcher and misses out on C.C., don’t be surprised if someone overpays for Demp. It’s happened before and it will happen again.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Nov 4, 2008 11:24 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Everybody around here has been ridiculously discounting the market for pitching
All this talk of economic hardship having impact on the supply and demand equation for free agent pitching is hogwash. There was never a chance that Dempster would sign for some magical hometown discounted contract of 3 years plus a vesting option. Again, it is easy to rattle off the names of a bunch of high profile teams who have screaming need for starting pitching.
"Listen, if you start worrying about the people in the stands, before too long you're up in the stands with them." -- Tommy Lasorda
by MDBNIU on Nov 4, 2008 11:29 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The Steinbrenner Boys.
You should write the Broadway musical.
Brian McRae's 5 o'clock shadow
by PurpleLineToWrigley on Nov 4, 2008 11:35 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I laughed. I cried. I pounded sand!
"I see I'm not the only one around here who can't hold his water." - Last words of the leaky pipe in the visiting team dugout, Dodger Stadium, October 4, 2008.
by dat cubfan daver on Nov 4, 2008 1:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The only caveat is that some of the teams that need pitching can't afford a top-flight arm.
Pittsburg needs pitching, but they don’t have the cash. However, there are still teams that can afford to add a big-time pitcher and as long as those teams are around, the price for Demp will rise.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Nov 4, 2008 11:36 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh the Irony...
We all wanted to string Dempster from a pole in 07 and now we think he walks on water. IMO, He is somewhere between that and because of that, he needs to be slotted appopriately. If he is asking for more money/years than they think he is worth, than let him walk. Call me crazy…but I am fully comfortable with going into the season with Marshall as my #4 and taking the draft picks for Dempster.
The only way that I think Dempster or another FA pitcher would be a must have is if the plans are to flip Marshall for another piece…i.e. LHB.
MLB history is littered with pitchers who have had one outstanding year and several mediocre ones sprinkled in…Don’t make a mistake.
"Sports are a crazy business. If there was a template, we'd all be champions, right? But there's one winner and 29 or 30 losers; one guy wins, everybody else is tied for last. That's the way it works" -- Mark Cuban
by TheRiot Police on Nov 4, 2008 12:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I happen to agree with you
I have big problem going 4 years at $55 million plus for Ryan Dempster. He is a good pitcher but I’ll bet the ranch he never again approaches his 2008 numbers. Cubs will rue the day they give Dempster a fat contract. I hope the bidding gets ridiculous and he walks. I’m okay going with Sean Marshall and other “lesser” options.
"Listen, if you start worrying about the people in the stands, before too long you're up in the stands with them." -- Tommy Lasorda
by MDBNIU on Nov 4, 2008 12:33 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
+ 25
Well, Next Year is here .. and Jack's century's gotta end some time .. GO CUBBIES!
by cubnational on Nov 4, 2008 9:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
How many people thought that DeRo would ever duplicate his 2006 numbers when he signed with the Cubs?
He put up about 90% in 2007, and 110% in 2008.
If Demp has 90% of the season in 2009 that he had in 2008, I’d be happy — even at $14M. I don’t think he is a “true ace” — he’s more of a #2 — but how valuable is it having 2 dependable #2 starters like Lilly and Demp?
While a leadoff hitter and a way to manufacture runs might help win playoff games, getting to the playoffs requires a good, deep starting rotation.
"I've never complained about it. I'm thankful to have a jersey." Mark DeRosa, 22 Aug 2007
by DeRoMyHero on Nov 4, 2008 9:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
+25
"I see I'm not the only one around here who can't hold his water." - Last words of the leaky pipe in the visiting team dugout, Dodger Stadium, October 4, 2008.
by dat cubfan daver on Nov 5, 2008 10:50 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Would you take marshal for a fourteenth of the money
and 90% production of Demp’s 90%.
If ya got 12 to 13 wins out of Marshall and then reallocated the Dempster Money to a leadoff hitter or LHB and resigning Woody would that be enough to cover Dempster’s perceived value. Then you go into a playoff scenario with Zambrano, Harden, and Lilly as your main three. You can’t fix all of the holes via Free Agency and the one thing that we do have is two pitchers who are capable of being starters in the ML (Gaudin and Marshall). What we don’t have is a LH power bat or a leadoff hiter. If you go after Demp/Woody, then you might not be able to do much with the lineup unless you go the trade route.
Lets just hope that they do their due diligence and make the right decision. Letting Dempster walk is not like letting Maddux walk.
"Sports are a crazy business. If there was a template, we'd all be champions, right? But there's one winner and 29 or 30 losers; one guy wins, everybody else is tied for last. That's the way it works" -- Mark Cuban
by TheRiot Police on Nov 5, 2008 11:13 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
No, I wouldn't...
Sean Marshall has never pitched 130 ML innings in a season. He has also had on-and-off issues with shoulder tendonitis that make it somewhat unlikely that he could take the ball 30 times. Therefore, I don’t think that he could come close to 90% of Dempster’s total production — IP, Ws, Ks, etc. — 70% would be my best guess. If Marshall wins 12, but only pitches 130 innings, the bullpen will be shot.
Also, counting on Rich Harden to make 30 starts is a recipe for disaster. If your rotation is:
Z
Lilly
Harden
Marquis
Marshall
you have only Gaudin as a backup to Rich Harden; you can’t count on Rich Hill until he actually does something in ST. That leaves the Cubs reliant on Marquis as the #4 starter and no depth at AAA (unless you think you can count on Donald Veal).
If you don’t have a solid rotation, you might not make the playoffs, so the extra LHBs won’t even matter. In an ideal world, you re-sign Demp and Woody, and add two LHBs. However, Jim Hendry’s world is not quite that ideal.
"I've never complained about it. I'm thankful to have a jersey." Mark DeRosa, 22 Aug 2007
by DeRoMyHero on Nov 5, 2008 11:46 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Okay...
But just like we did not think that Dempster was going to do what he this year when it was thrown around that he was going to be a starter last year.
I don’t really know if Marshall/Gaudin are the answer but you can’t let Dempster hold you hostage. If he prices himself so high that it makes moves this year or the following years extremely difficult, you have to consider letting him walk
Would you take Lowe for approximately the same price but less years? I think that I would…
"Sports are a crazy business. If there was a template, we'd all be champions, right? But there's one winner and 29 or 30 losers; one guy wins, everybody else is tied for last. That's the way it works" -- Mark Cuban
by TheRiot Police on Nov 5, 2008 11:57 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I would, but Lowe wouldn't.
If anything, he’ll get more money and years than Demp because he has a longer track record as a SP.
The difference between Demp and Marshall is that Demp had TJ surgery several years ago, and has not had any problems since. (Most guys recover completely from TJ.) Marshall’s problem is with his shoulder — and shoulders are much more problematic than elbows — and it seems to be chronic.
That’s why I have more trouble being confident about Marshall taking the ball 30 times than I was with Demp. (I didn’t think that Demp would have this good of a season, but I wasn’t worried about him having elbow problems.)
"I've never complained about it. I'm thankful to have a jersey." Mark DeRosa, 22 Aug 2007
by DeRoMyHero on Nov 5, 2008 12:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I doubt that Lowe gets more years
He is at an age disadvantage there. He might get more money per year but not more years.
I truly don’t think that Dempster will take less than 4 guaranteed years and they will be at a price of 13 to 15 mil. If the cubs feel comfortable hitching their wagon to that and it is not going to hamper them from making deals this year or in the future than I guess go for it. However, it would be foolish to pay him based on this year alone which is what I am afraid they are going to do. They and their saber dudes need to figure out if this year was a fluke and what his normal output would be and then make him an offer accordingly.
"Sports are a crazy business. If there was a template, we'd all be champions, right? But there's one winner and 29 or 30 losers; one guy wins, everybody else is tied for last. That's the way it works" -- Mark Cuban
by TheRiot Police on Nov 5, 2008 2:15 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think that it's discounting the market of pitching.
The fact is that Dempster is extremely tough to value – he has one single year as a successful starter, which isn’t much of a body of work. It’s difficult to predict what he’ll get because he’s such a unique case.
by Wreckard on Nov 4, 2008 1:15 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Remember, Dempster was a successful starter with the Marlins.
He was even was an All-Star. He got hurt after he was traded to the Reds which is how he ended up with the Cubs.
Funny how that worked out, isn’t it? If he hadn’t gotten hurt and had TJ surgery, he would never have become a Cub. You know what they say, things happen for a reason….
Hey, it's a new century!
by cowsarecool220 on Nov 4, 2008 2:40 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree that no one should do it
especially after the Zito Dizaster. But clubs have money to spend, so…
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 4, 2008 2:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The higher the price goes up for Peavy, the higher the price
goes up for Demp. Once you get past C.C., the talent for FA pitchers drops pretty fast. Demp could end up being priced out of the Cubs target.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Nov 4, 2008 11:16 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
What about AJ Burnett and Ben Sheets?
Where do they fall in the pecking order of FA starting pitchers?
It does seem like the starting pitching available talent is much greater this year than last off-season.
Hey, it's a new century!
by cowsarecool220 on Nov 4, 2008 11:41 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
All three have injury comcerns , but Demp appears to be the most healthy of the three. Burnett
had a good year, not as good as Demp, but Demp pitched for a much better team. I would rank Burnett and Demp about equal with Sheets a step behind because of his recent injury problems.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Nov 4, 2008 11:52 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I wonder
if a team could sign a pitcher for less years (maybe 2 or 3), if he would be more attractive than a pitcher who would require more (5, 6 or 7)?
If a pitcher, like Sheets, who has a recent history (an injury each year over the last several years) could be signed for 2 or 3 years, do you think he might be more attractive to teams than CC Sabathia who may require 6 or 7 years?
Hey, it's a new century!
by cowsarecool220 on Nov 4, 2008 11:58 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Signing pitchers to long-term deals is always a risk. The Zito contract is becoming the
poster child for the risks of long-term pitching contracts. I think you have to look hard at a guys past, what physical shape he is in and hope he stays healthy. I don’t think C.C. is a risk. Signing Sheets to a 2 year deal is probably riskier than signing C.C. to a 6 year deal. It all depends on the player.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Nov 4, 2008 12:15 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I remember reading an article earlier this year
listing the best long term contracts for pitchers. I believe Maddux’s initial contract with the Braves (5 years, I think) was listed as the best or among the best of long term deals of 5 years or more for pitching.
What was shocking is how few of those deals turned out well. Overwhelmingly, the deals ended up being a bad deal for teams. And yet, every year, a pitcher(s) are signed to 5 years or more deals by teams.
There is no bigger crapshoot than projecting the health and effectiveness of starting pitching, except maybe relief pitching!
Hey, it's a new century!
by cowsarecool220 on Nov 4, 2008 1:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
There's only a couple of pitchers that I would consider signing to a 5 year deal. I would
only do it if there was no other way I could get that pitcher. Santana and C.C. would be the only candidates that come to mind and I’m not sure about C.C. Iwould never signa pitcher over 30 to a deal of more than 3 years plus an option. The current market probably won’t allow you to sign many players with those restrictions, but as you noted signing pitchers to long term deals rarely pays off.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Nov 4, 2008 1:16 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well...
I doubt any team that offers up a 5 year contract on a starting pitcher is expecting for that pitcher to stay healthy and effective for the full duration. Rather they are banking on the belief that the signed pitcher can get them over the hump and help them win in the short term.
We have example of this philosophy with the Cubs in the form of Alfonso Soriano and his assinine 8 year contract. Hendry and the Cubs were looking at the short-term in that deal.
"Listen, if you start worrying about the people in the stands, before too long you're up in the stands with them." -- Tommy Lasorda
by MDBNIU on Nov 4, 2008 1:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Might as well take a look at Derek Lowe, too
should Dempster leave.
I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg
by Trey2317 on Nov 4, 2008 12:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
To me...he is the best option
if you can pry him away from the Red Sox (rumored destination) or the Dodgers. He has the experience that you need and probably for a much more reasonable price whether that be in years or dollars.
"Sports are a crazy business. If there was a template, we'd all be champions, right? But there's one winner and 29 or 30 losers; one guy wins, everybody else is tied for last. That's the way it works" -- Mark Cuban
by TheRiot Police on Nov 4, 2008 12:32 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Lowe would probably command a 3 or 4-year deal
and you’d have to bump up the dollars to keep him from Boston or LA, but he’s got good stuff and postseason experience and seems to work well in the big city environment.
I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg
by Trey2317 on Nov 4, 2008 12:34 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Problem is Lowe says there are two options for himself...
Return to Boston or stay with Los Angeles.
"Listen, if you start worrying about the people in the stands, before too long you're up in the stands with them." -- Tommy Lasorda
by MDBNIU on Nov 4, 2008 12:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think the Cubs have a shot
Both New York teams are going to pursue him, too, so Lowe will have more suitors than just Boston and LA.
It’ll be up to him to decide if he wants to limit bidding to just 2 teams, or up his price with multiple bidders.
I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg
by Trey2317 on Nov 4, 2008 12:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Freddy Garcia's worth a look in my view;
plus the Japanese pitchers Kawakami and Uehara.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 4, 2008 2:19 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I just want to say that...
if the question is Peavy or Dempster, there’s really no debate. I love Demp just as much as the next guy, but we’re talking about one of the best pitchers in baseball or a guy who had ONE great year.
by kanderber on Nov 4, 2008 1:09 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Remember that outside of Petco...
… Peavy is league-average.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Nov 4, 2008 1:15 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Don't worry about Peavy
He’s not coming to the Cubs. Not with at least a half a dozen other teams going to be very hot on his trail and Kevin Towers having the ability to sell to the highest bidder. Felix Pie, Sean Marshall and Jose Ceda is going to be readily topped by other teams.
"Listen, if you start worrying about the people in the stands, before too long you're up in the stands with them." -- Tommy Lasorda
by MDBNIU on Nov 4, 2008 1:19 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think you should repeat that. Some of us didn't quite hear you.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Nov 4, 2008 1:21 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, please. One mo' time! With feeling!
"I see I'm not the only one around here who can't hold his water." - Last words of the leaky pipe in the visiting team dugout, Dodger Stadium, October 4, 2008.
by dat cubfan daver on Nov 4, 2008 1:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Pound sand
"Listen, if you start worrying about the people in the stands, before too long you're up in the stands with them." -- Tommy Lasorda
by MDBNIU on Nov 4, 2008 1:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Aw, c'mon now. You're spoiling me!
"I see I'm not the only one around here who can't hold his water." - Last words of the leaky pipe in the visiting team dugout, Dodger Stadium, October 4, 2008.
by dat cubfan daver on Nov 4, 2008 3:15 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Peavy, league average away from Petco?
According to Sportsline.com, http://www.sportsline.com/mlb/players/player/splits/2004/288915, since 2004 here are Peavy’s home vs. road splits
2004 – 2.33 ERA away vs. 2.21 home
2005 – 2.98 ERA away vs. 2.81 home
2006 – 4.57 ERA away vs. 3.75 home
2007 – 2.57 ERA away vs. 2.51 home
2008 – 4.28 ERA away vs. 1.74 home
So, really this season was the only real drastic difference between home and away splits. Also, I am aware that this is just his earned run average, but it tells a decent story. 2006 was an off season for him, and last season was injury filled.
Does that mean that he can pitch at such a high level in home games at Wrigley Field against a tougher division? No, but he isn’t really “league average” outside the park either.
Mario Kart Wii -- April 27th!
by TheBeerBaron on Nov 4, 2008 1:39 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Major overstatement
Plus, home/road splits can be random and some guys always do a little worse on the road, no matter their park. Peavy’s #s are bolstered by PETCO, yes, but Peavy is still a good pitcher.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 4, 2008 2:21 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Peavy would be the best starting pitcher in the Cubs rotation.
Over time, your quickness with a cocky rejoinder must have gotten you many punches in the face - Al Swearengen
by lemon20pie on Nov 4, 2008 3:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Not when Rich Harden is healthy.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 4, 2008 3:15 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Which is.....?
Brian McRae's 5 o'clock shadow
by PurpleLineToWrigley on Nov 4, 2008 3:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Harden and Peavy seems to be very good if not great when healthy but
the problem with them is that they throw a lot of pitches and very rarely make it through the 7th. That puts a lot of pressure on the bullpen and means that we need to have a top notch bullpen going into any playoff scenario where these guys pitch.
This get us back to the need to resign Wood or a suitable replacement for Marmol since that makes the bullpen stronger by keeping Marmol in the 8th slot or putting a Marmol like arm there. If you make Marmol the closer and choose to fill his role internally, we are left with a combination of Guzman, Shark, Gaudin, Cotts, Wuertz, etc to get it to him. Guzman has some upside, Shark has lost some of his luster until he develops his secondary pitch…. Some much focus lately has been on the SP but the bullpen is just as critical to build/keep intact if they want to continue this run of success.
"Sports are a crazy business. If there was a template, we'd all be champions, right? But there's one winner and 29 or 30 losers; one guy wins, everybody else is tied for last. That's the way it works" -- Mark Cuban
by TheRiot Police on Nov 4, 2008 4:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
When is Harden Healthy?
"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"
by Grockcubs on Nov 4, 2008 4:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
last year
I put my 2 cents towards the top of the thread.
by uwbadger on Nov 4, 2008 5:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
His 2008
only qualifies as “healthy” for him. Skipped starts, delayed starts, and a heavy monitor on pitch counts does not qualify him for a healthy year. By his standards, yes, but not by normal ones. Harden does have the potential to be better than Z or Peavy, but he’s going to have to get throught the fifth and sixth innings to really be defined as an elite pitcher.
I’m hoping he can go deeper in games next year.
Free Ronny Cedeno
by Kansas25 on Nov 4, 2008 11:31 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Usually when a man is young.
Wait, what?
"I see I'm not the only one around here who can't hold his water." - Last words of the leaky pipe in the visiting team dugout, Dodger Stadium, October 4, 2008.
by dat cubfan daver on Nov 5, 2008 10:51 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
nice
thread here.
I BELIEVE!!!! GO CUBBIES!!!!!!!!!!
by cubsluver22 on Nov 4, 2008 4:32 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Updated SD Union-Trib on Peavy-Greene chatter
Of note:
1) Peavy and Green will not be in the same deal. There is enough of a market for Greene, that the Padres won’t need to dump him for negative value in a larger deal. The article lists other teams with interest in Greene. The Cubs are not included on that list.
2) Towers is “down the road” with 2 out of three of the finalists (Cubs, Dodgers, Braves). Given other reports, it would be surprising if the Cubs were not one of those 2. This suggests the Cubs have the inventory to make this deal. I know, I know, it still seems hard to believe.
3) Towers said the FA market is slowing trade talks; reading between the lines, I wonder if the Cubs-Pads have a potential deal but Hendry won’t pull the trigger, hoping he can just re-sign Dempster and use his trade chips elsewhere.
4) After golfing together, Hendry and Towers bowled together. Nice to see Jim is getting in his exercise.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 5, 2008 12:12 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
That's hopeful information
Not to mention Hendry pulled off a great deal to get Harden. I have faith in him.
"Pounding sand since 1982...."
by cubswynn on Nov 5, 2008 12:37 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for the update
This is interesting, it really is. I am wondering how much of this is posturing to try and push Dempster into signing early, or if Hendry would simply rather have Peavy as opposed to Dempster and is willing to give up the players.
Considering the LH bat hole and another at leadoff, I am struggling to see how Hendry can fill those by acquiring Peavy’s salary and still being able to sign Dempster. That is, unless Kenney can get Zell to approve a payroll around 140-145 mil, which I seriously doubt.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
by MPH73 on Nov 5, 2008 8:33 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
There is a strong possibility
that Hendry wants to keep his trade chips for Roberts/Hermida or who knows and that he is pushing on Peavy to let Dempster know – if you decide to make this thing protracted, we can replace you. Could Hendry even push Dempster into signing before next Thurs?
Re: Peavy’s salary – it is only 8 mill or so next year, so that actually would give Hendry some flexibility (as opposed to Demp or if Lilly was traded…). It’s 2010 and beyond that would be the problem.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 5, 2008 8:44 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I still believe Hendry sees re-signing Ryan Dempster as Job # 1
I am much more in favor of somehow acquiring Jake Peavy and letting Ryan Dempster walk via free agency. But I think Jim Hendry has exact opposite view. In the end he will get Ryan Dempster re-signed. I will puke over the contract, but that’s life.
"Listen, if you start worrying about the people in the stands, before too long you're up in the stands with them." -- Tommy Lasorda
by MDBNIU on Nov 5, 2008 9:42 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
How do you fill the other team needs
if you blow the whole trade wad on Peavy?
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 5, 2008 11:08 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
100% agree...
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
by MPH73 on Nov 5, 2008 11:19 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I dont' have a lot of future faith in Ryan Dempster
Hence why I wouldn’t be bummed out if an explosive bidding war erupts for his services and he leaves for greener pastures.
"Listen, if you start worrying about the people in the stands, before too long you're up in the stands with them." -- Tommy Lasorda
by MDBNIU on Nov 5, 2008 11:34 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The thing that people seem to not understand....
…..is that because of Peavy’s ridiculous contract after 2010, that the Padres will simply not get the great prospects that they should get for a talent like Peavy, because teams know that the Padres don’t want to be tied up to this guy after this season. The Padres totally overalued their farm system when they signed Peavy and thought that Peavy would be the veteran on a team full of young talent. They are in a full blown rebuilding mode now and Peavy doesn’t fit into their plans any more, not with that contract.
Having said that, I really don’t see what the Cubs could get for overrated prospects like Pie, Ceda and the rest……not too much. Do you understand what I’m trying to say? That with these prospects, and I say that very loosely, that are being bandied about for Peavy, I don’t think that they’d garner anything much of substance in return and if indeed the Padres are willing to just wash their hands of Peavy for those prospects that are being mentioned and the Cubs are able to get a Pitcher of Peavy’s stature, I’d do it in a friggen heartbeat.
Over time, your quickness with a cocky rejoinder must have gotten you many punches in the face - Al Swearengen
by lemon20pie on Nov 5, 2008 11:38 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'll have to disagree
Regardless opinion of Jake Peavy there will be full scale bidding war for his services. There are a number of big market playoff contending teams who are going to hotly pursue him from San Diego, to include the Yankees and Angels. Plus Peavy has already expanded his list of acceptable destinations once so there is nothing to stop him from doing it again. Imagine if the Red Sox and their well stocked farm system get into the bidding war? This all said I see zero chance that a package of Felix Friggin Pie, Sean Marshall and Jose Ceda could ever net a Jake Peavy. I bet Jim Hendry understands this too, hence why in the end he will pay whatever ransom Ryan Dempster demands. Cubs will live to deeply regret the day they give Dempster a 4 or 5 year contract for those multi millions.
"Listen, if you start worrying about the people in the stands, before too long you're up in the stands with them." -- Tommy Lasorda
by MDBNIU on Nov 5, 2008 11:53 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
RE: Red Sox getting involved....
From MLBTR.com
Let’s kick off a fresh post for today’s Jake Peavy rumors. A reminder of the latest news: Peavy has preapproved the Yankees and Angels, bringing his total to seven teams. Padres GM Kevin Towers indicated that Peavy would not approve a trade to Boston.
PHISH IS BACK!!!
HAMPTON, VA - MARCH 6, 7 and 8th!!!!
by TheBeerBaron on Nov 5, 2008 4:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think I understand what you're saying -
that there’s no way we get something of comparable value to Peavy with our trade chips in other deals, so we should take the best we can get in trade and then fill the other positions as we can. That makes sense, if I’m understanding you correctly.
I think Hendry, though, hopes he can get Roberts and would rather have Roberts and Demp than Peavy and no lead-off hitter.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 5, 2008 12:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The Brian Roberts' ship has sailed
Peter Angelos thinks of Roberts and Nick Markakis as his sons. Plus Andy McPhail is once again going to want a king’s ransom for Roberts. Most importantly the Cubs have a team MVP caliber player in Mark DeRosa who plays 2nd base to go along with an excellent role player (and important lefty bat) in Mike Fontenot.
Our leadoff hitter is going to come from somewhere else. I have growing feeling it will be Ryan Theriot. Either that or Lou Piniella will cave on the idea of moving Alfonso Soriano down in the lineup because Soriano pitches a hissy fit or there are no better options internally.
"Listen, if you start worrying about the people in the stands, before too long you're up in the stands with them." -- Tommy Lasorda
by MDBNIU on Nov 5, 2008 12:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The Roberts and Markakis examples prove why decisions on ballplayers should
never be based on emotional factors. Whether or not an owner “likes” a ballplayer should have nothing to do with whether he is traded, released or resigned. Decisions on players should soley be based on what’s best for the team and the player, nothing else.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Nov 5, 2008 12:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Why shouldn't the O's keep them?
They expect that their young pitching will be ready in 2010. Markakis, Adam Jones, and Matt Wieters form an excellent young core of position players. Roberts is still highly productive himself, he probably has at least four more good seasons in him, and he offers leadership to the young guys.
They have holes, but trading Roberts will just open up a new one for which they have no young replacement.
"I've never complained about it. I'm thankful to have a jersey." Mark DeRosa, 22 Aug 2007
by DeRoMyHero on Nov 5, 2008 1:08 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If Roberts is sick of the land of Tommy Carcetti, however,
the O’s should indeed trade him before he walks, and the Cubs can give them a number of middle IF options to give them young replacements.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 5, 2008 1:13 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If the O's didn't want Sean Gallagher, Sean Marshall, and Ronny Cedeño last year,
how do you propose to get Roberts this year when Gallagher is no longer available as the major piece?
Andy McPhail knows Theriot and Cedeño pretty well, and it is obvious that he isn’t interested in either. (He could have gotten Cedeño in a non-Roberts deal very cheap last spring, but he didn’t.)
We will know if Roberts is sick of the Inner Harbor in about a month. If he signs the extension he stays, and if he doesn’t he will be traded.
"I've never complained about it. I'm thankful to have a jersey." Mark DeRosa, 22 Aug 2007
by DeRoMyHero on Nov 5, 2008 1:33 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It will be much more difficult to acquire Roberts this year.
There are many more teams in the hunt for a 2B, for one thing.
That doesn’t mean that Hendry’s eye isn’t fixed upon Roberts.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 5, 2008 2:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The object is to improve the team. Obviously, the formula they have been
using hasn’t worked. It’s time to try something else. Holding on to a group of players and hoping the tean gets better is not a strategy. If moving a couple of players can return some good players, then it should be done. Holding on to Roberts at this point is not going to improve the team in the long term.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Nov 5, 2008 1:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
They are using a new formula.
Apparently McPhail secured a promise from Angelos that McPhail would rebuild the farm system and Angelos would be patient about it. They now feel that they have several top-flight pitching prospects that will be ready in 2010, and that is their target date.
They have a black hole in the infield other than Roberts, so they want to hold onto him and sign a FA SS or trade for someone like Greene who wouldn’t require significant prospects.
"I've never complained about it. I'm thankful to have a jersey." Mark DeRosa, 22 Aug 2007
by DeRoMyHero on Nov 5, 2008 1:36 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Are you serious? If that is the case, then moving Roberts should be high on their
list of priorities. If they feel they have enough prospects, then move him for a pitcher. Roberts won’t be there in 2010. It wouldn’t be prudent to let him play out his contract and get draft picks if the feel the team will be ready in two years. Get a major-league ready player for him now before he becomes a FA.
"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris
by willie mays hayes' gloves on Nov 5, 2008 1:41 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Roberts is only 31.
If they can sign him to an extension, why shouldn’t they? He will still be plenty productive in two years, and he will provide leadership for the youngsters.
"I've never complained about it. I'm thankful to have a jersey." Mark DeRosa, 22 Aug 2007
by DeRoMyHero on Nov 5, 2008 1:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe you're right
but multiple journalists have brought back the Roberts trade talk. I’d just as soon get that lead-off hitter elsewhere, particularly at the SS position. But, if you don’t get it at 2B and you put Dome in CF and you get a slugger for RF, where does that lead-off hitter come from? Are we going to have Bobby Dernier work with Geovany Soto on his base-stealing?
I would have thought, as you suggested, that Theriot would be an option, but no Cub article is talking like he is, and again, multiple sources are suggesting the Cubs need to acquire a lead-off hitter.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 5, 2008 1:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
How good are the sources?
Hendry has been directly quoted as saying that he wants to re-sign Demp and Woody, and get a LHB. Lou was directly quoted as saying that they need LHBs.
No source has directly quoted Hendry as saying “we need a leadoff hitter, preferably who bats LH” or anything close.
Methinks that the writers gathered around shooting bull while they wait for the various press conferences are hashing up the old stuff.
Bottom line is that you can have 2 of 3 between Roberts, DeRo, and a LHB power-hitter. Which two do you want?
"I've never complained about it. I'm thankful to have a jersey." Mark DeRosa, 22 Aug 2007
by DeRoMyHero on Nov 5, 2008 1:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd take the latter two.
You’re right, though, that we don’t KNOW about what the Cubs want.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 5, 2008 2:21 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Every Major Offseason Decision appears hitched to
Dempster. Depending on how that shakes out will greatly influences the trade proposals and the FA signings that are to come after.
"Sports are a crazy business. If there was a template, we'd all be champions, right? But there's one winner and 29 or 30 losers; one guy wins, everybody else is tied for last. That's the way it works" -- Mark Cuban
by TheRiot Police on Nov 5, 2008 4:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed.
Even if we did have enough prospects to land Peavy, we wouldn’t have enough to land anyone else.
David Dellucci, anyone?
"I've never complained about it. I'm thankful to have a jersey." Mark DeRosa, 22 Aug 2007
by DeRoMyHero on Nov 5, 2008 4:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
David Dellucci might be a target
Assuming he can regain health he would be a wise addtion.
McGrath: I got a good deal on those boys. The scouts said they showed a lot of promise.
Reggie Dunlop: They brought their f***in' TOYS with 'em!
McGrath: Well, I'd rather have em playin with their toys than playin with themselves.
Reggie Dunlop: They're too dumb to play with themselves. Boy, every piece of garbage that comes into the market and you gotta buy it!
by MDBNIU on Nov 5, 2008 8:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He doesn't have a RF arm,
but he is a much better OF than Dunn. Obviously, Dunn would bring a bigger bat, but he might not fit into the budget.
"I've never complained about it. I'm thankful to have a jersey." Mark DeRosa, 22 Aug 2007
by DeRoMyHero on Nov 5, 2008 9:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I also like the idea of a player that
would only require a one year commitment. I wouldn’t think it would take much to acquire Dellucci too.
Hey, it's a new century!
by cowsarecool220 on Nov 5, 2008 9:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I like Dellucci
but, he doesn’t fit the “LH bat people fear” mode.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Nov 6, 2008 9:44 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Tough call...
…and it may not depend on what their first choice is, but what is most available.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
by MPH73 on Nov 5, 2008 3:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 



















