Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

1 week until Santo gets into the Hall of Fame!

I wanted to know everyone's thoughts are about Santo's chances this time around. Like almost everyone I know, this is one of the greatest injustices in baseball. I hope this post takes us in a different direction than the posts recently about all of the trade rumors. Don't get me wrong, I love talking hot stove, but like many of you, I have been waiting my whole adult life for what I think (hope) will take place on December 8th. So.....your thoughts?

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.

Comment 84 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

good luck

ronnie. this is my sign of luck for our chances next year. if he gets in—so do we.

Dear Santa:: All I want for X-mas this year is an official 2009 Jake Peavy Cubs Jersey. Oh and a Beimel one too. I've been a real good guy for the most part!!!

by cubsluver22 on Nov 30, 2008 8:27 PM CST reply actions  

Don't get your hopes up.

A member of Society of American Baseball Research ( SABR) recently sent a post to folks on this in general
and said that it was unlikely ANYONE would get in because it is such a small voting group and everyone who was up had fallen very short. Al or Mike who are also members might remember more details but it looked grim.

"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry

by Doggie Stalker on Nov 30, 2008 8:39 PM CST reply actions  

I saw that same post.

I think he’s wrong. Santo missed by only five votes (IIRC) last time. The “small voting group” is irrelevant… I think because this current committee has failed to elect anyone and there was such an uproar last time, they are under considerable pressure to put SOMEONE in. Santo’s the most logical choice.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Dec 1, 2008 4:01 AM CST up reply actions  

I pray you're right Al!

This is only the beginning....Lou Pinella end of '07 season and Chicago Transit Authority (the band when they were really good).

by mrcubsfan on Dec 1, 2008 12:46 PM CST up reply actions  

It will happen...

This will be the third time around for voting on the veterans committee, of which they have not voted in anyone. There is a large amount of pressure on the committee to vote someone in or there is a chance they will be disolved. Ron will be voted in on December 8th.

Heroes get remembered but legends never die

by CubbieBlue1138 on Nov 30, 2008 8:46 PM CST reply actions  

Wait...can someone explain

the possible dissolution?

Brian McRae's 5 o'clock shadow

by PurpleLineToWrigley on Dec 1, 2008 10:25 AM CST up reply actions  

The committee serves at the pleasure of the Hall of Fame's board of directors.

If they continue to fail to vote anyone in, the HoF is likely to just tell them to forget it and disband the committee.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Dec 1, 2008 10:31 AM CST up reply actions  

Do they really want to let anybody into their club?

I truly think that they don’t want to thus the existence of the committee is pointless.

"When two Whales Fight, many Shrimp Die" - Korean Proverb

by TheRiot Police on Dec 1, 2008 12:55 PM CST up reply actions  

I think the HoF has made it clear that they WANT them to admit someone.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Dec 1, 2008 1:05 PM CST up reply actions  

I hope you're right.

I just hope they’d make a decision one way or another insead of getting up the hopes of these older gentlemen every 2 years. That just seems cruel to me.

Hey, it's a new century!

by cowsarecool220 on Dec 3, 2008 12:48 PM CST up reply actions  

He was only 5 votes shy last time.

Yes, it’s a smaller group. That means they have fewer people to choose from (only 10). Santo was 5 votes shy last time not “fallen very short” as Doggie Stalker claiimed.

by cubbiesrule on Nov 30, 2008 8:56 PM CST reply actions  

It's a percentage thing

If I remember correctly the SABR post said he got about 51%. The gist of it was that no one would get it because they were a very
small and apparently stubborn group but I would be happy to be wrong.

I won’t visit Cooperstown until Santo or Dawson gets in.

"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry

by Doggie Stalker on Nov 30, 2008 10:32 PM CST up reply actions  

Honestly if the Veterans Committee doesn't vote him or anyone in this time,

then what is the purpose of having it? It just gives false hope to former players and fans of teams. Its ridiculous to have it if all they do is not elect members.

To see your idol player whom you have grown up watching be cast aside by his loyal organization can make even a grown man choke up...We'll miss you #34!

by Chanman25 on Nov 30, 2008 9:02 PM CST reply actions  

seriously

that would be twice in a row right?

Okay, just so I understand it... in your wildest fantasy, you are in hell. And you are co-running a bed and breakfast with the devil.

by bren on Nov 30, 2008 9:07 PM CST up reply actions  

If they don't elect him, it could be that he doesn't deserve to be there...

I know this is a Santo love-in, but as has been discussed before, there are many of us who simply feel he doesn’t deserve to be in the HOF. Yes, he was a very good player, but he wouldn’t get my vote for the HOF. He has been rejected so many times, why does he deserve to get in now?

In the middle of a good time, Truth gave me her icy kiss. Look around, you must be joking. All that way, all that way for this? -Oysterband

by Ross on Nov 30, 2008 10:01 PM CST up reply actions  

Because all the rejections are ill-considered.

Why wouldn’t he get your vote? He was the best third baseman of his generation. He hit 342 home runs in only 14.5 seasons — in a lower-offense era. He won five gold gloves and was a nine-time All-Star.

For the statistically minded, look at his HOF Monitor numbers — they’re pretty good, especially considering the length of his career.

Voters should also consider the fact that he did everything he did while having juvenile diabetes, and he was the first high-profile athlete to admit to being one; that has raised awareness for diabetes and other athletes have followed in his path; they might not have done so if not for Santo. And yes, that DOES mean something.

If Santo had played another 3-4 years, OR had been in the postseason even once, he’d have been elected long ago.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Dec 1, 2008 4:05 AM CST up reply actions  

Regarding diabetes

This was in the 60’s when there weren’t any home glucose monitors and he couldn’t just inject himself with insulin. Diabetes was very difficult to self manage prior to the 1980’s. To be able to “feel out” your blood sugar and be a professional athelete at the intensity that Santo played while having diabetes is, I’m assuming, very difficult.

by daeviant on Dec 1, 2008 10:43 AM CST up reply actions  

I said he wouldn't get my vote. YMMV

There are a bunch of other guys who are in who don’t deserve to be there (that has already been discussed in another post.) IMHO, voting Santo in would just add another guy to that list, further diluting the Hall of Fame into the Hall of Really Good.

I don’t deny that the man could play baseball, and I respect his ability to play with diabetes. He was very good. But I don’t think he was great. There are other reasons I am not a fan of him, things I have read about his actions and personality that rub me the wrong way, and I believe that there has been a lot of revisionist, sympathetic history over the past few years, covering up the bad memories.

Al, you raise a point… If Santo had played another 3-4 years or had been in the postseason even once, he would have been elected… I can’t disagree with that. But he didn’t do either of those things. One was by choice, once was by chance. But he didn’t go to the postseason and didn’t put up elite numbers for those extra years. And in my book, that doesn’t make him a hall of famer. Close, but no cigar.

In the middle of a good time, Truth gave me her icy kiss. Look around, you must be joking. All that way, all that way for this? -Oysterband

by Ross on Dec 1, 2008 11:49 AM CST up reply actions  

I say...

… losing the 3-4 years wasn’t by choice, it was because of the diabetes. And that counts, in my book.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Dec 1, 2008 1:05 PM CST up reply actions  

but that opens the door

I get that he had diabetes and that adds to the narrative of his career, but it shouldn’t be a part of his hall of fame candidacy. It really opens the door to letting guys in because of internal and external forces that can be used to excuse lack of stats or durability. In the most extreme of cases we can have someone making a case for Mark Prior’s candidacy. Had he not lost 16 years of his career to that damn injury he might have reached 300 wins.

Yes, that might be a silly and extreme example, but IMO we should be putting guys into the hall based on the numbers that they actually put up.

by dmlichte on Dec 1, 2008 1:17 PM CST up reply actions  

Agreed...

You can’t reward people for playing with injury or illness. You play, you ain’t hurt.

There is also an elephant in the room here with the Veterans Committee. Santo used to piss people off with that heel-clicking routine.

I wasn’t alive then, but I’ve seen the films. It’s bush-league. It’s also a little un-manly, tell the truth. If a Cardinal had done it, we’d be making fun of him up and down.

The worst beer I had was pretty good.

by Worf on Dec 1, 2008 1:32 PM CST up reply actions  

Ozzie Smith did backflips.

Isn’t that way more ostentatious than heel-clicking? Let me answer. Yes.

Brian McRae's 5 o'clock shadow

by PurpleLineToWrigley on Dec 1, 2008 1:34 PM CST up reply actions  

Ozzie got voted in

Before he had to get submitted to a jury of his contemporaries.

And Ozzie didn’t do it after a victory. He did it before the game.

He also played on three World Series teams and is in the top three for greatest defensive shortstops EVER.

The worst beer I had was pretty good.

by Worf on Dec 1, 2008 1:36 PM CST up reply actions  

I was responding to you saying that we would have

made fun of a Cardinal doing something like that, not the merits of Ozzie Smith being in the Hall…

I just think that point is a bit off-whack…If someone on the V.C. isn’t voting ANY player in (including Santo) for something like clicking their heels, it seems like a personal vendetta, and they are doing the entire process a dis-service. I certainly hope that no one like that is voting…

Brian McRae's 5 o'clock shadow

by PurpleLineToWrigley on Dec 1, 2008 1:40 PM CST up reply actions  

Absolutely, it's wrong and off-whack

But it’s real. I also think the politicking for Santo has gotten people’s backs up and they dig in more.

Again, not right.

But I am embarassed for Ron when I see the heel-clicking. I am really surprised he didn’t get a fastball in the ear for it, back in the day.

The worst beer I had was pretty good.

by Worf on Dec 1, 2008 1:45 PM CST up reply actions  

Well, I still disagree...

Don’t see how that is different from the outfielders doing their collective jump/bump (whatever you want to call it) after a victory…

If it is after the game, running off the field, I don’t see any problem with showing emotion…It certainly never seemed to be directed at an opposing player (from clips I have seen). Also, he only did it at home…Seems on par with playing “Go Cubs Go” after victories, IMHO.

Brian McRae's 5 o'clock shadow

by PurpleLineToWrigley on Dec 1, 2008 2:13 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree

The heal click was not directed at the other team. I’ve never heard of ball players saying that they were pissed at Santo for that. They might have been pissed at other things because Santo was very competitive.

by Chodes on Dec 1, 2008 2:22 PM CST up reply actions  

The difference

Ozzie opened the game with the flip. Santo did the heel click to flaunt the win. Is it any different than the outfielders doing the mid-air body slam? No, probably not, but back in the day…

And let’s just lay it out there… Santo pissed off a lot of people. Players, coaches, managers, media, fans, you name it… He is reaping what he sowed.

In the middle of a good time, Truth gave me her icy kiss. Look around, you must be joking. All that way, all that way for this? -Oysterband

by Ross on Dec 1, 2008 4:01 PM CST up reply actions  

"Flaunt the win"

He did it while running back to the clubhouse, so…disagree…

Brian McRae's 5 o'clock shadow

by PurpleLineToWrigley on Dec 1, 2008 4:13 PM CST up reply actions  

The heel click happened spontaneously once.

He was encouraged by Leo Durocher to keep doing it. Maybe he shouldn’t have, but you didn’t cross Leo.

I agree, it came across as arrogant. And hey, the Cubs wound up not winning, and he stopped doing it.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Dec 1, 2008 4:39 PM CST up reply actions  

You can't count what might have been

You can’t count the years that Santo might have played if he didn’t have diabetes.

If you count that then why not Tony Oliva? He had really bad knee problems but without that he would probably be a lock. He won 3 batting titles, ROY and was 2nd in MVP twice. Santo doesn’t have any that. Oliva also has a higher lifetime OBP+ than Santo. Oliva was probably also impacted by his health a lot more than Santo during his prime. Oliva only had 3 years with 155 or more games. Santo had 8.

Personally I don’t think Oliva should be in but Santo should be but you absolutely cannot count the numbers that “might have been”.

by rlpete on Dec 1, 2008 2:09 PM CST up reply actions  

In Santo's case...

… I think the diabetes trumps any injuries that might have been suffered by others. Injuries are part of the game. Santo played DESPITE the diabetes, and further, played 150 or more games for 11 straight years.

I’ll bet you can’t name 10 players from the last 10 years who have done that.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Dec 1, 2008 2:34 PM CST up reply actions  

The post below by MPH73 says it correctly

Santo should be in regardless of the diabetes. Injuries, disease etc. are part of the game and life. The diabetes should not be raised in the discussion of qualifications. Are we going to start ranking illnesses and injuries and give bonus points for those players who overcame those we consider more difficult?

Santo’s actual numbers and the fact that he was arguably the best NL 3rd baseman during most of his career should get him in the HOF.

by rlpete on Dec 1, 2008 2:42 PM CST up reply actions  

Exactly.

Rec’d.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Dec 1, 2008 2:33 PM CST up reply actions  

I will be at Cooperstown if it happens...

i will get a tatoo on my right calf with the Cubs C surrounded by “this old Cub” and “HOF #10”

if it does… that being said… its not gonna happen. not because he doesnt deserve it but becuase the HOF vets committee is the most snotty stuck up group alive. They dont want to expand their country club.. i feel bad for ron. i really do. will be saying a prayer for him next sunday. Ron is the cubs to my moms generation..

"I played with one of the best pitchers in history, Greg Maddux," Zambrano said"

by fischisgod on Nov 30, 2008 10:29 PM CST reply actions  

I have trouble with this...

…Santo himself doesn’t want to be known for diabetes hurting his career’s longevity, but I think only when you look at it in that context is he a hall of famer. He doesnt quite have the career numbers, but he should definitely be in because of what he accomplished in a short time and with a disease that hindered him.

While I want Ron and Dawson in the hall of fame very badly, I almost wonder if the Hall of Fame should really be a place with players who weren’t no brainers. The Hall of Fame is about Legends and greater than great players, not just great players. Unfortunately that means players like Jim Rice, Tommy John, and others shouldn’t be in there, for the mere fact that people have to think about whether or not they are Hall of Famers. When you think “should Tony Gwynn be in the Hall of Fame?” or Wade Boggs or Ryne Sandberg, there isn’t a second thought about it.

That said, Ronnie and Dawson should definitely be there, but I am biased.

by northpaw22k on Dec 1, 2008 2:33 AM CST reply actions  

I can tell you one thing..

there won’t be a dry eye in BCB during his induction speech if he does get in. Cooperstown will be swarmed with Cubs fans.

Bleeding Cubbie Blue since 1985.

by Bricks and Ivy on Dec 1, 2008 9:36 AM CST reply actions  

Blame 1969

I think there has been an unspoken sentiment among the voters that no team that failed to reach the postseason should have so many Hall of Famers.

If Santo gets in, that will be Santo, Banks, Williams and Fergie. That’s four Hall of Famers from an era that is most famous for collapsing.

The worst beer I had was pretty good.

by Worf on Dec 1, 2008 9:37 AM CST reply actions  

About winning...

.. if, on the one hand, those Cub teams had made even ONE postseason, Santo would probably already be in, especially if he had done well in that postseason.

On the other hand, not winning shouldn’t disqualify players who otherwise had HoF quality careers.

Also, Jenkins played half of his career elsewhere. (And didn’t make the postseason there, either.)

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Dec 1, 2008 10:05 AM CST up reply actions  

It cuts both ways

If the Cubs continue this run and put together 4-6 years of playoffs and even break through to the World Series one year, the Hall of Fame chances of players like Zambrano, D-Lee, A-Ram and potentially even Soto are much improved.

The worst beer I had was pretty good.

by Worf on Dec 1, 2008 1:29 PM CST up reply actions  

I've heard that argument before...

but what does the number of individual HOF on any team have to do with that team’s success? If anything it just shows how tragic that collapse/incredible the Mets run was. Those are the stories that make baseball what it is. It is the Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum after all.

Though, on the note about 4 HOF from a team that didn’t make it to the postseason, it was at the tail end of Ernie’s career and he wasn’t playing at his HOF level.

by CubFan81 on Dec 1, 2008 10:42 AM CST up reply actions  

1978-79 Padres

They had Ozzie Smith, Gaylord Perry, Dave Winfield, and Rollie Fingers. They finished in the bottom half of the NL West both seasons.

"The big possum walks late." - Harry Caray

by memphiscub on Dec 1, 2008 12:59 PM CST up reply actions  

Now that's just silly

Not one of those players is remembered as a Padre. Three of the four won championships with other teams. They have as much attachment to the 1978-79 Padres as Sammy Sosa has to the White Sox.

Try again. Do better next time.

The worst beer I had was pretty good.

by Worf on Dec 1, 2008 1:25 PM CST up reply actions  

What The Padres Proved

In 1978, Perry won the Cy Young; Fingers led the NL in saves; Smith won NL Rookie of the Year; Winfield was a 20-20 guy hitting over .300. That team finished in fourth at 84-78. A team can have four HoF’ers having good seasons and still not make postseason. That doesn’t mean any of those individual players don’t belong in the Hall. No one can blame that quartet for that team not winning the NL West.

"The big possum walks late." - Harry Caray

by memphiscub on Dec 1, 2008 3:21 PM CST up reply actions  

With the possible exception of Perry

The 1978 season was not the career highlight for any of those guys.

Ozzie and Winfield went on to far greater things and Fingers had come from the A’s dynasty.

Not one of those guys is remembered as a Padre failure. Not a single one.

The worst beer I had was pretty good.

by Worf on Dec 1, 2008 3:57 PM CST up reply actions  

1978-1980 Red Sox

Those 1978-1980 teams already have Eckersley, Yaz, and Fisk in the Hall of Fame. That team is best known for its failure in 1978 in not winning the AL East. Should Jim Rice be denied because that would make four Hall of Famers from that team?

"The big possum walks late." - Harry Caray

by memphiscub on Dec 1, 2008 4:17 PM CST up reply actions  

Sigh...

You aren’t getting the concept of players doing OTHER things…

Eckersely did not get in because of his time with the Red Sox. He got in for his time with the A’s.

Yaz had 3,000 hits. End of discussion.

Fisk had the most homers for a catcher until Piazza came along.

Santo is far more borderline than anyone you have mentioned. And I don’t think Rice should get in. His road/home splits would make a Colorado Rockie blush. He was a strikeout machine, especially for that era, and he didn’t have the five rings like Reggie to compensate.

Furthermore, Yaz was on three other World Series teams.

The worst beer I had was pretty good.

by Worf on Dec 1, 2008 6:25 PM CST up reply actions  

Rec'd

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Dec 1, 2008 10:05 AM CST up reply actions  

Santo will get screwed again!

Sorry, that’s just my feeling. I hope I’m wrong, but the voters just can’t see 4 guys becoming hall of famers from teams that never won anything.

by rememberthecoop on Dec 1, 2008 10:16 AM CST reply actions  

I was looking for some warm news this morning...

…and glad I found this post.

Ronnie deserves the HOF.

Proud recipient of a hot dog shot from the Iowa Cubs hot dog gun.

by IowaCubs- on Dec 1, 2008 10:47 AM CST reply actions  

according to google maps

its a 13 hour drive from des plaines to cooperstown. Here’s hoping that piece of information ends up being useful.

---AC 00 00 00 - Believe

by mjk83 on Dec 1, 2008 11:03 AM CST reply actions  

Jim Kaat

He’s the only other guy on the list being considered by the Veterans Committee that I feel has even a slim chance. I only remember Kaat as a relief pitcher with the Cardinals in the early 1980’s. I do see he had a lot of great years with the Twins and White Sox from the 1960’s through the mid-1970’s. I think Santo is more deserving, but if there is someone that gets in besides Santo, it would be Kaat.

"The big possum walks late." - Harry Caray

by memphiscub on Dec 1, 2008 12:27 PM CST reply actions  

Good luck, Ron!

I missed out on his playing days, but hope he finally gets into the HOF this year.

by Dave in the basement on Dec 1, 2008 12:33 PM CST reply actions  

# 10 A REAL CUB

I am keeping my fingers crossed also . Look at the numbers and how hard he played and just how sick he must have been . To factor in the post season thing is just plain wrong . Keep your chin up Ronnie …..

by cubs north on Dec 1, 2008 1:16 PM CST reply actions  

To repeat previous posts....

Santo shouldn’t be compared to 3B’s that played after him, but to his contemporaries and those that played before him. When I look at other guys that played 3B before and during his career, I see 3 at the most, that could be considered as good or better: Traynor, Matthews, and Robinson, who gets in more for defense than offense, but wasn’t horrible at the plate. So when Santo retired, based in stats alone, and the era he played in, he was at worst, the 4th best 3rd baseman of all time, to that point. That’s a Hall of Famer at any position.

As a 28 year diabetic, now with a kidney and pancreas transplant, I understand much of what he went through, but I also agree that Ron didn’t want to be judged on playing baseball as a diabetic, but just as a ballplayer. Going by what he did as a ballplayer, I would vote him in. Brett, Schmidt, Boggs being in, after he was done playing, should have no bearing on his worthiness.

by jtiet on Dec 1, 2008 4:25 PM CST reply actions  

Correct...

…Santo played in a pitcher’s era and was a top run producer while being a stellar defender.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Dec 1, 2008 4:42 PM CST up reply actions  

I'd argue Killebrew but otherwise

you are correct. It can be argued that Santo is still borderline top 10 of all-time. He should be in.

by rlpete on Dec 1, 2008 4:48 PM CST up reply actions  

Santo

I hope he gets in but I can buy the argument that he is not a hall of famer.

No MVP’s; only finished in the top 5 twice.
No Postseasons – agreed this is a weak predictor
Only a 4 time starter in all-star game
No batting titles, never a HR, RBI, R, H leader, although was two-time OBP leader
only top 10 in XBH five times

I also think his obsession with getting in the hall has hurt him. I think he is one of the great Cubs of all time but I can understand the argument that he shouldn’t get in. Also, just because there are some undeserving guys in the hall doesn’t mean Ron should get in. The fact that he wasn’t voted in the first round of BBWAA voting who all saw he and his peers play says a lot to me. It is the hall of fame, and should be for the elite players of a generation, not the very good.

by uwbadger on Dec 1, 2008 5:10 PM CST reply actions  

Four-time ASG starter...

… but nine-time All-Star… in an era when the teams were chosen by managers, not fans. In many ways being an All-Star in the 1960’s meant more than it does now, when it’s not much more than a popularity contest.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Dec 1, 2008 6:01 PM CST up reply actions  

Diabetes

Think about diabetes and think about Ron being one of the only position players in baseball history with the disease.

I always say you can tell if someone really knows the game by how they feel about Santo and the HOF. The more you know the game the more likely you are to support his candidacy.

I also have heard that Ryno who is extremely respected by his fellow HOFers has been really working for this.

MaIne South Hawks 2008 Class 8a Champs!

by puckishcubsfan on Dec 1, 2008 8:03 PM CST reply actions  

People don't take into account enough

If Santo hadn’t had diabetes he would of played for 4 or 5 more years. You add 4 or 5 more years off numbers and you get real close to other HOF’ers offisive numbers. Santo would of had close to 500 HR’s if the diabetes didn’t end his career early. Not only did he put up pretty good numbers for his time, he did it while battling a disease that was WAY harder to keep under control back then. You can’t keep a man out of the HOF for reasons beyond his control, you must look at what he did with what he had. Pretty amazing if you ask me.

Heroes get remembered but legends never die

by CubbieBlue1138 on Dec 1, 2008 10:11 PM CST reply actions  

What if's

Not this again. “What if’s” don’t count. As I posted earlier, tell me why Santo should be in then and not Tony Oliva. Oliva has 3 batting titles and a ROY and 2 2nd place MVP finishes. If Oliva didn’t have extremely bad knees than he would be in. if we count “what if’s”, I may put Oliva in before Santo.

Santo should be in and not Oliva but “what if’s” and “maybe’s” do not count. All that matters is what they did and Santo is a HOF’er to me. Adding “what if’s” only hurts the cause as it implies he doesn’t deserve it on the numbers.

by rlpete on Dec 1, 2008 11:13 PM CST up reply actions  

"Extremely bad knees"...

… is a little different from playing with a disease like diabetes, wouldn’t you say?

Santo dealt with that every single day he stepped on a baseball field.

Oliva played eight years pretty much injury-free until the knees started to go. And then the DH rule saved him and gave him three more years after that.

I trust you can see the difference.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Dec 2, 2008 4:19 AM CST up reply actions  

I guess we disagree

I see the difference and I stated that Oliva isn’t a HOF’er.

I just don’t see why the fact that Santo was a diabetic or the fact that maybe he might have played longer if he didn’t have diabetes has any bearing on the argument. In fact, I think it weakens it because you are implying that the numbers aren’t good enough so you have to imagine that he didn’t have diabetes and consider the numbers he might have produced.

Santo should be in the HOF on his numbers as a 3rd baseman. The fact that he had diabetes makes it a more impressive career but it has no bearing on HOF-worthiness IMO.

by rlpete on Dec 2, 2008 10:54 AM CST up reply actions  

My point is...

… the diabetes does make it more impressive; I think the numbers are good enough on their own. Without the diabetes he might have been considered the best 3B ever.

Consider: Brooks Robinson is in the HoF. Robinson wasn’t nearly as good a player as Santo, but he played longer AND he was a World Series hero. The latter is what got Robinson in.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Dec 2, 2008 1:46 PM CST up reply actions  

Lest we forget.........

…………..that Brooks was an All-Star Game MVP, an AL MVP with 6 other top 10 MVP finishes, along with 16 Gold Gloves.

Let’s not sell the Vacuum Cleaner short.

"Happiness? A good cigar, a good meal, a good cigar and a good woman - or a bad woman; it depends on how much happiness you can handle." ~ George Burns

by tville on Dec 3, 2008 8:37 AM CST up reply actions  

Like I said...

… Robinson was a good player. But Santo was better.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Dec 3, 2008 8:39 AM CST up reply actions  

My last post on the topic

We basically agree and I even somewhat agree with your comment “Without the diabetes he might have been considered the best 3B ever.” Not sure about that with Mike Schmidt and now A-Rod but that’s a different argument.

My only point is that the above statement while true should have no impact on the HOF selection. It cannot be the HOF for what might have happened.

In Santo’s case, it is a bit of a moot point as we both agree that he is a HOF-er based on numbers. I guess the bottom-line question is let’s say Santo falls just short of HOF-worthiness. Would you say that he deserves to be in because of the time missed to the diabetes? That’s my point here, you can’t count what might have been but can only look at what really happened.

by rlpete on Dec 3, 2008 9:29 AM CST up reply actions  

Imagine how much better............

………..Mickey Mantle might have been if he had not contracted osteomyelitis?

Agreed. You’ve got to make decisions based on the results.

"Happiness? A good cigar, a good meal, a good cigar and a good woman - or a bad woman; it depends on how much happiness you can handle." ~ George Burns

by tville on Dec 3, 2008 10:32 PM CST up reply actions  

No...

… imagine what Mantle could have done if he hadn’t tripped over that water sprinkler in the outfield during his rookie year.

That’s what caused him most of his trouble, chronic knee problems.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Dec 4, 2008 12:43 PM CST up reply actions  

No thanks to that bastard..........

………..DiMaggio for belatedly calling him off on the fly ball.

It’s widely held that Mantle having osteomyelitis likely weakened his immunities, especially in the legs. So his healing after the sprinkler incident was slowed by the previous conditions.

"Happiness? A good cigar, a good meal, a good cigar and a good woman - or a bad woman; it depends on how much happiness you can handle." ~ George Burns

by tville on Dec 4, 2008 1:58 PM CST up reply actions  

And vast amounts of alcohol.

"Hats for bats.....keep bats warm." - Pedro Cerrano
"Hey bartender, Jobu needs a refill !!!!!!!" - Eddie Harris

by willie mays hayes' gloves on Dec 4, 2008 2:00 PM CST up reply actions  

.........and women.

"Happiness? A good cigar, a good meal, a good cigar and a good woman - or a bad woman; it depends on how much happiness you can handle." ~ George Burns

by tville on Dec 4, 2008 2:04 PM CST up reply actions  

The Mik...

…had a career a lot like Bobby Orr did. Both were absolutely dominant, and played the bulk of their careers on knees that were bone on bone.

Of course, Orr did drink a little less and he had to retire at the ripe old age of 30.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Dec 4, 2008 9:59 PM CST up reply actions  

It will be...

Monday December 8th.

Heroes get remembered but legends never die

by CubbieBlue1138 on Dec 2, 2008 8:53 PM CST reply actions  

These things are usually..

… announced in the early afternoon. I’ll keep an eye on it and post as soon as it’s announced.

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Dec 3, 2008 4:13 AM CST up reply actions  

Also

Also it will probably be leaked by about 11 our time. I’m going to be in a stupid meeting all day at work. The receptionist a huge Cubs fan is going to keep an eye on things and pop her head in with the news as soon as it’s official. (She is a lurker here who I’ve been encouraging to sign up and post but she had an incident on the internet that has scared her off posting anywhere.) and will probably check here for updates.

I work in a cool office full of Cubs fans. Even those that aren’t got kind of caught up in the excitement last summer. Only issue is the boss is a Packers fan.

MaIne South Hawks 2008 Class 8a Champs!

by puckishcubsfan on Dec 3, 2008 6:04 AM CST up reply actions  

I can't imagine hearing Ron without Pat...

I mean, whether he makes it in or not, I’m sure we’ll hear from good old Ronnie on WGN. But to not hear him discuss the results (hopefully good!) with Pat will be a bit of a letdown for me. Anyone else feel this way?

For that matter—what does Pat Hughes do during the off-season? Does he broadcast any other sports?

DTM Index: 125
(DTM = Days ’til Milton!)

by jdb-44 on Dec 3, 2008 8:41 AM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Jazz Up Your Recs!
Img_0001_small
Value of Various Plate Approaches
284_small
Cubs' Fantasy Camp 2012 as seen by a Player's Wife
P7200073_small
Randy Hundley Fantasy Camp 2012

Recent FanPosts

Small
Arguably OT: Aussie Baseball Finals Go To Decisive Game Three
Small
New Cubs draft strategy player development
Jeffnewwork_small
What I Expect From The Cubs In 2012
Wrigley_scoreboard_small
What To Do With Alfonso Soriano
Small
A quick update from the 2012 concessions orientation
Caray_small
Is there any FA left worth going after?
Marvin_the_martian_small
Thoughts On Gerardo Concepcion: Trust The Scouts
Star_small
What if Hendry were still our GM instead of TheoJed?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Nice article about Ernie Banks
Yankees Hire Jim Hendry
Dale Sveum Meets Early Arrivals At Camp Buss

Recent FanShots

The Rickettsification of Wrigleyville has begun!
Marlins' Cespedes Offer 6 years, under $40M (MLBTR Link)
BCB Fantasy Baseball 2012
Former Cubs Blogger Interviewed on The Score
Cubs vs. Rangers In Las Vegas Tickets On Sale Monday 2/13
Hoyer driving to Spring Training with his dog
Hoyer-Soriano likely a Cub to start 2012, Garza extension talk a possibility
Law's Top 100 prospects
Ranking the Farm Systems
WGN Releases Season Schedule

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Featured Poll

Poll
How many games will the Cubs win in 2012?

  301 votes | Results

It Is Only...

It Is Only...

Cubs By The Numbers

Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.

Click here to order your copy, available now!

Recent Stories in Ticket Exchanges


Managing Editor

Alyellontoppscard_small Al Yellon

Front Page Contributors

Primary_fc_small Josh Timmers

Marvin_the_martian_small Shawn Domagal-Goldman

Other Contributors

Dsc_0139_small David Sameshima

Toonmike_small Mike Bojanowski