Well, not wholly, but mostly. You get my point. Lets look at his last three years. He went from an OPS or .886 to .814 and then back up to .843. He’s going to be thirty five and while his bat will be solid, his glove is awful, even worse than Dunn’s. The only thing Abreu has over Bradley is durability. After factoring his atrocious glovework, FanGraphs had him worth only 5 million, which means he should be a DH. Dunn was worth 8.7 million and Bradley was worth a notch below 17 million. It’s clear that Abreu is the worst of the three and if Bradley can be had for a decent deal I would much rather go after him. Even if he misses thirty-forty games he should still provide just as much production as Dunn and probably more than Abreu, and if he were to play 150 games he would be the team’s most productive player.

100 RBIs in the middle of the lineup. Good guy, always healthy.

Frankly, I’d rather unload every major player for minor-leaguers and start a five-year rebuilding plan than sign Bradley. The Cubs would have a better chance at a championship with nine rookies than with the current team plus Milton Bradley.

Few players in Pro sports can single-handedly destroy a team internally like Milton Bradley. He’s a blue-light special every offseason for a reason, and I wish Hendry would lay off the egg nog long enough to realize there’s a reason this Katrina-flooded Lexus is going for $3000.

If the Cubs are interested in signing piss-poor, despicable human beings because the scouts like their tools, let’s sign Barry Bonds. He’ll be more of a weapon offensively, and a better person to have on the team (which says a lot about Milton).

Just sign Bonds if you can turn a blind eye to Bradley.