And What Would YOU Like For Christmas?
As we prepare for the Winter Meetings beginning Monday, let's use this post as a one-stop weekend shop. Post here who you'd like to see the Cubs go after and who you'd like to see the Cubs trade away.

What about this guy?
Looks like he's got a pretty good slider.
Let's try to make this post a little creative. How about staying away from 10,573 "GETPEAVY" or 27,310 "DUMPMARQUIS" posts. Post something that you haven't heard anyone talk about before. Come up with a creative idea to get Jeremy Hermida, maybe. Or another outfielder who hasn't been discussed. There's a FanPost just posted by DGU that has some specific suggestions, some of which are realistic and interesting, but I'd like to hear more, and maybe things that none of us has heard speculated about or rumored yet.
The Cubs could use some bullpen help, too. Hmmm. Didn't they just have a good right-handed reliever? Some guy who used to wear #34? Maybe if we're all good little boys and girls, he'll still be around next year.
And remember, Hanukkah starts on December 21. If Jason Marquis is still a Cub then, he'll be wanting his gifts a few days early.
213 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I wish there was a way we could get Jed Lowrie or Asdrubal Cabrera.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
Interesting.
What would you give to get either one?
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
I can't think of trade proposals that work.
The problem is that both clubs would rather subtract their current, higher-cost, RH SSs than their cheaper, switch-hitting ones. The Sox want to dump Lugo. The Indians want to add another IF and if they were going to trade an IF, they’d almost certainly rather trade Peralta than Cabrera.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
Peralta is a good player.
What would we have to give to get him?
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
Peralta
is one of the SSs whose defense is suspect. But let’s say we wanted to get him – I think a trade involving DeRosa for Peralta would please the Indians. That would allow them to look at riskier options for 2B and 3B (including Josh Barfield again), shuttling DeRosa back and forth.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
I would deal DeRosa and Cedeno for Peralta
Peralta is signed to two more affordable years.
Fontenot (fon-te-no): Cajun for "scrappy"
Yea I want those things too.
In order to get those things I think we need a more typcial leadoff man. We need someone in our order who does bats from the left side. We need some Speed and athleticism. Which is why all i want for Christmas is Rafeal Furcal.
Oh yea and we need someone on our roster with range and an arm at Shortstop. He brings alot to the table and word is A’s are out of the running.
I know you said no Marquis...
"If I were playing third base and my mother were rounding third with the run that was going to beat us, I'd trip her. Oh, I'd pick her up and brush her off and say, 'Sorry, Mom,' but nobody beats me." ~ Leo Durocher
Ahh, sorry.
Ok, so I know you said no marquis, but i have an interesting idea. What about trading Marquis to the Rockies for someone like Clint Barmes? They have a surplus of infielders. Barmes can play 2B/SS/3B and hit .290 with 11 homers and 13 stolen bases. Similar to a certain Riot we have already. This would put DeRosa in right field, possibly platooning with Fukudome. Marquis, as we all probably know, fits in well in Colorado given his sinker and ability to get ground balls
"If I were playing third base and my mother were rounding third with the run that was going to beat us, I'd trip her. Oh, I'd pick her up and brush her off and say, 'Sorry, Mom,' but nobody beats me." ~ Leo Durocher
Barmes isn't similar to Riot.
In fact, they are mirror images of each other. Barmes is an excellent defensive SS who hasn’t figured out how to steal first. Riot is a sub-par SS with a good OBP. Barmes is also a RHB.
That said, I would rather have Barmes at SS than Riot, but I don’t want Riot at 2B and DeRo in RF.
"I've never complained about it. I'm thankful to have a jersey." Mark DeRosa, 22 Aug 2007
totally out of nowhere
Robinson Cano
Girardi apparently was upset with him after showing up out of shape last year, and the Yankees need pitching. So … why not trade Lilly (former Yankee) and Marquis for Cano? I believe Lilly has a limited NTC, but I’m not sure. Or maybe one of the two plus Fontenot? I apologize if I’m undervaluing Cano.
Cano has three years left on a $28 million deal, he hits left handed and he seems like a decent fit in the No. 5 hole.
Let’s say Lilly and Marquis could get it done. The Cubs would then free up about $10 million, allowing for the Peavy trade.
What say you all on this?
Nope.
Lilly AND Marquis? All that does is cut salary, but by weakening the starting rotation. No thanks. (Peavy’s not coming here.)
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
I dunno.
Sounds like you’re just swapping virtually identical parts. Fontenot is a valuable platoon player/utility player.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
The Yanks would want Lilly and DeRo (at least).
They have LHBs in Damon, Matsui, and Posada. They would want someone more proven.
"I've never complained about it. I'm thankful to have a jersey." Mark DeRosa, 22 Aug 2007
I might be in favor of that
DeRo likely won’t repeat his 2008 numbers.
It would probably be a good trade for both teams,
assuming that CC and A.J. sign elsewhere. Lilly is a consistent, seldom-injured #3 SP who has proven that he can handle NY, and DeRo is a steady 2B with a good bat. The Yanks tried to sign DeRo in 2006 and have long coveted him.
If the Yanks decide to move Jeter to 2B in 2010 they don’t re-sign DeRo; otherwise, they can re-sign DeRo for a year or two without losing their first round pick.
Canó has a 109 career OPS+ despite an 86 last year, but I’m not sure that Girardi wants him around — the Yankee brass is split on that. He is a LHB IF with power, so the Cubs will have to pay dearly to get him.
"I've never complained about it. I'm thankful to have a jersey." Mark DeRosa, 22 Aug 2007
Lilly and DeRo = paying dearly
A 17-game winner and a 20-home run guy who can play five positions is a lot.
Why does everyone want to get rid of Lilly
I do not get that at all, hes been great for the team, and he’s awesome in every way shape and form, hes the teams version of Chuck Norris
Okay, just so I understand it... in your wildest fantasy, you are in hell. And you are co-running a bed and breakfast with the devil.
Dependable Lefty Starter
32-17 over the past two seasons is an amazing record for any Cubs pitcher. His ERA’s may not have been stellar, but they have been below the league average the past two seasons. Lilly’s a lefty. You’ve got to go back to Ken Holtzman in 1969 and 1970 to find a Cub southpaw starter who put together two straight seasons as good as what Lilly has had. Dependable lefty starters are hard to find.
"The big possum walks late." - Harry Caray
I like Lilly
But to get something good, you need to give up something good.
Besides, Lilly is sort of a sell-high proposition right now AND he would be somewhat attractive to other teams because he only has two years left on his deal.
I’m fine with keeping Lilly. I’d also be fine trading him in the right deal.
Here's the question -
when you look at Cano’s 2008 and Fontenot’s 2008, if we were going to move DeRosa off 2B (by trade or by position), why would we spend major trade chips for Cano, instead of giving Fontenot the chance for much less salary?
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
because Cano ...
is more of a proven commodity. And he’s put up good numbers hitting in the AL East.
But last year Cano was no good. And he's not a well-respected defender.
What if stays no good and you get stuck holding his contract?
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
it's a gamble
Change of scenery might do Cano good. And his contract isn’t terrible as long-term deals go.
I’ll admit I don’t know a lot about Cano’s defense, but Fontenot isn’t exactly a Gold Glover.
What if LBR sucks in a full-time role like he did in 2007?
The chances of Canó (who is 2 years younger) bouncing back are greater than LBR’s chances of suddenly learning how to handle the outer third of the plate.
"I've never complained about it. I'm thankful to have a jersey." Mark DeRosa, 22 Aug 2007
That's why
in any scenario where the Cubs try to give Fonty 400 or more ABs, they also keep Theriot to platoon and take over if Fonty falls flat. If we’re not playing DeRosa, I’d rather go with Myan Fontriot than trade the parts necessary to get Cano (which is not to say your Yankee trade idea doesn’t make sense, it’s just my preference to stay in-house).
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Dec 5, 2008 2:25 PM CST up reply actions
Cano is not going anywhere
Listened to Cashman on WFAN, they sent there minor league batting instructor (who Cano has good relationship with) to the Dominican to work with Cano. Cashman and Girardi both think last year was a down year and Cano will bounce back. They see Cano as a batting champ.
From listening to Cashman, it would take a ton to get Cano.
"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"
I consider myself a pretty knowledgeable baseball fan...
…but the biggest problem I have with playing GM is trying to figure out which players I could trade and which ones I could not. I can read Cott’s Contracts all I want, but it still doesn’t tell me how to understand arbitration, 10/5 players, etc. Navigating these waters is just plain hard.
Evey Hammond: Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici. V: By the power of truth, I, while living, have conquered the universe.
Ever see the ESPN NBA trade machine?
that thing is awesome, you can run trades through it to see if the money matches and if any particular roster clauses prevent deals….its pretty cool, they should get an MLB one going, but I think its a bid more intricate than NBA trading
Okay, just so I understand it... in your wildest fantasy, you are in hell. And you are co-running a bed and breakfast with the devil.
One of these please

I haz blurg: hotbeans.wordpress.com
by digitalbenjamin on Dec 5, 2008 12:37 PM CST reply actions 9 recs
Yeah.
I could go for that.
Boiler up!
by halfblindcubbiegirl on Dec 5, 2008 3:40 PM CST up reply actions
How about changing course and play a little would you rather?
Would you rather the Cubs put basically the same team out on the field that they have the last two years only to again lose in the first round or see them trade away a DLee, Marquis, Soriano to build a younger, speedier more versatile team?
Soriano
isn’t going anywhere. But I’d be fine with trading D-Lee and Marquis.
Lee has a NTC
but his contract is movable. Soriano’s (SIX MORE YEARS!) really isn’t.
This question is ironic
coming from a guy named “SammySosa”. I thought you’d prefer the older, sluggish team!
Dan
Evey Hammond: Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici. V: By the power of truth, I, while living, have conquered the universe.
This question is ironic coming from a guy named "SammySosa". I thought you’d prefer the older, sluggish team!
Funny, very true though. Remember, Sammy once was very speedy and versatile despite the strikeouts before he became HR king.
Anyway, Its what needs to happen.
KU off to Insight bowl...
…and I’m 95% certain Bucky the Badger will be meeting them. I’m very, very afraid of this matchup. Mainly because I’m a UW alum now at KU.
Dan
Evey Hammond: Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici. V: By the power of truth, I, while living, have conquered the universe.
Sure you can
I’m a NC guy and love my Heels, but i paid for 2 kids to go to FL State so I have to root Noles also
If the world didn't suck we would all fall off.
Where-abouts in NC?
I went to college and have family in Brevard, an hour down the road from Asheville.
"Well, we're out of cake! We only had three bits and we didn't expect such a rush! So what do you want?"
"What, so my choice is 'or death?' Well, then I'll have the chicken, please."
--Eddie Izzard
I live in Asheville
Been here 20 years, longest I’ve lived in one place in my life
If the world didn't suck we would all fall off.
I see your a Bass Player
I’m an ex army tuba player who plays a horrible blues bass. But het it’s all fun
If the world didn't suck we would all fall off.
Huh
I actually played tuba at Brevard College all four years. Lots of good music in that part of the state, and such a great variety of it too.
"Well, we're out of cake! We only had three bits and we didn't expect such a rush! So what do you want?"
"What, so my choice is 'or death?' Well, then I'll have the chicken, please."
--Eddie Izzard
Brevards a great place
i’m a flyfishing Junkie and hit the Davidson quite often, enjoy going down for the Brevard music series in the summer also
If the world didn't suck we would all fall off.
I worked at the Music Center one summer as a sound guy.
And I always liked being able to drive half an hour off campus to get to the middle of nowhere in Pisgah Nat’l Forest.
"Well, we're out of cake! We only had three bits and we didn't expect such a rush! So what do you want?"
"What, so my choice is 'or death?' Well, then I'll have the chicken, please."
--Eddie Izzard
If you have ties to both teams, sure you can
as long as you’re not busting out the phrase “my second favorite team”. That phrase for some reason always makes me discount someone’s sports opinion.
Boiler up!
by halfblindcubbiegirl on Dec 5, 2008 3:47 PM CST up reply actions
In response to everyone...
I mean that as it applies to a single game where two teams one likes are matched against each other. Must declare one supreme before kickoff, tipoff, first pitch, etc.
Free Ronny Cedeno
I have no problem cheering for Buckingham Badger.
But I am afraid that Reesing & Co. will rip Bucky apart.
Evey Hammond: Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici. V: By the power of truth, I, while living, have conquered the universe.
I think they'll lose regardless of the opponent
I’m pretty much looking at the bowl game as extra practice, which is nice for next season.
Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer J. Simpson
by Shanghai Badger on Dec 6, 2008 12:40 PM CST up reply actions
I wonder what it would take to get Adam LaRoche...
I know he plays 1B, but with our history with the Pirates, he might be attainable…
Brian McRae's 5 o'clock shadow
by PurpleLineToWrigley on Dec 5, 2008 12:55 PM CST reply actions
and he'd hit .170 the first 2 months of the season like he always does...
no thanks
Whoever said you can't mix business with pleasure never owned a PuttPutt course---Andy Bernard
by carmen_fanzone on Dec 5, 2008 2:00 PM CST up reply actions
Personally, I'd like to see Rick Ankiel in right
and would be willing to trade Zambrano (after getting he-who-shall-not-be-named) to do so.
…not that either club would do this, buy it’s my Christmas
Why?
Do you just really really not like Zambrano or have a like for steroids users like Ankiel?
MaIne South Hawks 2008 Class 8a Champs!
by puckishcubsfan on Dec 5, 2008 1:19 PM CST up reply actions
Zambrano, his no-hitter aside, has lost his lustre for me. I love his passion but can’t stand his decision making. I’m also fearful of wear and tear.
So you'd rather have a former pitcher who can't hit fastballs?
Really?
Boiler up!
by halfblindcubbiegirl on Dec 5, 2008 3:43 PM CST up reply actions
Alright - here's a not-heard-before suggestion.
Trade Pie for Adam Jones. Move Jones back to SS.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
I don't think the Mariners will trade Jones.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
He's an Oriole now.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Dec 5, 2008 1:23 PM CST up reply actions
Right.
Well, they won’t trade him either.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
There's a reason this was a
not-heard-before suggestion. Well, several reasons.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Dec 5, 2008 2:26 PM CST up reply actions
And I think we've all learned NOT to try to make a deal
with the Orioles.
Boiler up!
by halfblindcubbiegirl on Dec 5, 2008 3:44 PM CST up reply actions
I would like to see
the cubs go hard after ichro.. Give the farm, give them anything they want. I think he puts the cubs over the hump. Gives them everything they need
You'd have to move the Cubs to Seattle.
Because Ichiro is their franchise. They will never trade him. Ever.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
ok fair enough
then Im willing to give up defense for Adam Dunn.. Im sure he sucks in right field, but to think of the mammoth home runs he would hit at wrigley gives me goosebumps. Plus i think with Reed and Dome in center shading to right helps Dunn a little.
Ha, thatd be a sight
He would be perfect for this team though
Okay, just so I understand it... in your wildest fantasy, you are in hell. And you are co-running a bed and breakfast with the devil.
For what it's worth...
Lots of Mariner fans might disagree. While they love Ichiro, the frustration about the team (and the size of his contract, which is seen as really limiting them) has opened talk about maybe just starting fresh…plus he’s not exactly a spring chicken.
I’m not saying I agree with that (I think they’d be nuts to do so). But you’d be surprised how many fans I hear that make comments along that line.
Of course, that’s fans. Not the Club Brass.
by CubsWin!Oregon on Dec 5, 2008 9:45 PM CST up reply actions
Here's my off-the-wall suggestion.
Call up Jim Bowden and see what it would take to get John Lannan from the Nationals.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
or Scott Olsen
I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg
I'd rather have Lannan.
Olsen has head-case baggage.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
True
Lannan definitely has the potential to be a solid middle of the rotation starter for years to come.
I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg
why Lannan?
why not just let Sean Marshall pitch????
acquiring Lannan won’t do any good if you won’t even let the current “Lannan” on the roster pitch
by DartmouthCubsFan on Dec 5, 2008 1:51 PM CST up reply actions
Here you go....
Call Jim Bowden and see what he would give you for Sori?
Call up The pads and work a three way deal that would send Dlee, Pie, Vitters and others to the Pads and O’s, bringing back Adrian Gonzales and Peavey. Dlee would go to the O’s as part of this deal.
What would I like for Christmas????
1. Not to spend half a day or more in February waiting (unsuccessfully) in the Cubs single game tickets Virtual Waiting Room…while simultaneously and repeatedly dialing the 1-800 phone line only to hear an endless busy signal… :(
2. To be able to afford to bring my four-person family to a Cubs game and an overnight stay at a hotel in Chicago without it costing the equivalent of a term of college tuition for my son… :(
3. Seeing the Cubs actually WIN a game I attend at Wrigley for a change… :)
OK, so much for the smart a** SCROOGE answers!
So, what would I like for Christmas????
1. A HOF phone call for Ronnie that says: “Congratulations Mr. Santo. You are the newest member of the Baseball Hall of Fame”.
2. To meet Ernie Banks and have him sign my copy of his book “Mr. Cub” (that I’ve had since I was a teenager in the early 1970s).
3. To have my photo taken with Mr. Cub.
4. To go back in time to October 14, 2003 and see Moises Alou catch that fly ball in the 8th inning of the NLCS; and moments later, to see Alex Gonzalez catch the ground ball and get a force out to end that same inning…
5. To see the Fish go 3 up and 3 down in the top of the ninth of that same game and watch my second fondest Cubs wish come true: the Cubs clinch a trip to the World Series at Wrigley with me in attendance.
6. My fondest wish: to watch the Cubs clinch the World Series at Wrigley. (Admittedly, not an original wish…)
7. To attend Spring Training in 2009. (Hey wait, I really AM going to Spring Training in 2009. Yippee! At least one of my wishes came true…)
Merry Christmas to BCBers everywhere, and remember, don’t shoot your eye out.
Go Green! Go White! GO STATE! (Now #12,966 on the Cubs season ticket waiting list- UP from 13,031...WHOO HOO!)
by Zeke on Dec 5, 2008 1:33 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
SPRING TRAINING TRIP....
I went with the crew from the Heckler last March ….We all met at Midway had a great time and saw some good games . Was much needed for me had been a very long winter . March is now my favorite month …..
Going on the March 6-9 WGN Radio trip. Can't wait... :)
Go Green! Go White! GO STATE! (Now #12,966 on the Cubs season ticket waiting list- UP from 13,031...WHOO HOO!)
Probably, but why would you want him?
33 and injury-prone, and with some baggage. No thanks.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
question
Im sure you have said it here before, but who is your back up if we cant get Hermida?
Luke Scott or Aubrey Huff.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
i agree
with Huff, i think he is extremley under-rated. but I dont see Luke Scott as the big bat the cubs are looking for.
Scott hit...
.257/.336/.472 with 23 homers last year. Sounds pretty good to me.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
Yeah, if you can make a deal with the O's.
Brian McRae's 5 o'clock shadow
by PurpleLineToWrigley on Dec 5, 2008 3:18 PM CST up reply actions
Well, that's an issue, true.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
I like Huff a lot
But he isn’t a particularly good right fielder. His last season with significant time in RF was with Houston 2 years ago, when he was worth 27 runs below replacement per season.
He’s probably a better option than Ibanez, but still not a very good option.
doubtful
why would they move him? They don’t have money problems and his bat was too valuable for them. They moved Crisp, so they don’t have that OF flexibility.
Patience
Give Pie a chance to play everyday and see if he can actually be the long-term answer in center. And give Fukudome a chance to earn the last three years of his contact.
Oh, and finding an owner would be nice, too.
I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg
Al, what's with the advertising IN your post?
I don’t mind a little self-promotion from SBN, but the Happy Holidays from Best Buy ad right above it?
I know you don’t control these kind of things, but hasn’t SBN crossed a line with this move? What’s next – ads on the ivy covered BCB logo?
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
Like you said...
… I have no control over these things. My understanding is that this is being done as an experiment by Best Buy to see how it goes over.
No ads on the BCB logo, that I’ll promise.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
News flash:
Hundreds of angry, slightly inebriated Cubs fans stormed the offices of SBNation blogs today, demanding that ads be removed from BleedCubbieBlue, the Cubs blog on the network. They also demanded that the Jake Peavy trade issue be resolved, as there were many dinners riding on the deal; that Ernie Banks’ birthday be declared a national holiday; and that Brew Crew Ball be renamed to prevent confusion.
The crowd was dispersed by telling them that Ron Santo was a lock for the Hall of Fame this year.
You forgot that the mob demanded the re-signing of Kerry Wood.
The mob was placated when every one of them was given a Kerry Wood replica jersey.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
"slightly" inebriated Cubs fan?
No such thing… ;-)
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
Nonsense!
I’m a Cubs fan, and I’m slightly inebriated right now! Shortly I will be much more inebrated!
"Well, we're out of cake! We only had three bits and we didn't expect such a rush! So what do you want?"
"What, so my choice is 'or death?' Well, then I'll have the chicken, please."
--Eddie Izzard
I want the feeling i had
on October 1st back
I miss that feeling
by DartmouthCubsFan on Dec 5, 2008 1:42 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
stupid question: what does rec'd mean?
received?
Okay, just so I understand it... in your wildest fantasy, you are in hell. And you are co-running a bed and breakfast with the devil.
Recommended.
Available under the ‘actions’ choice at the bottom of each post.
"Well, we're out of cake! We only had three bits and we didn't expect such a rush! So what do you want?"
"What, so my choice is 'or death?' Well, then I'll have the chicken, please."
--Eddie Izzard
thats what I suspected, thanks
but this one was in response to someones comment though
Okay, just so I understand it... in your wildest fantasy, you are in hell. And you are co-running a bed and breakfast with the devil.
God you're so stupid!
Oh wait I’m the same guy that didn’t know how to do the quote box haha.
"Pounding sand since 1982...."
My wish for Hanukkah...
At the risk of getting flamed by everyone not named Jessica:
Trade Lou Piniella for Randy Winn. That would give us a solid OF and a manager (Alan Trammell) who won’t bitch about not having a perfect lineup.
Barring that, fire Lou and give Pie the CF job and Dome the RF job. Keep Wuertz in the pen and vow to pitch him more than once a week. Leave Spellcheck at Iowa to develop as a SP.
Back in the real world…
I wonder if the M’s want to make changes badly enough that they would be willing to trade Yuniesky Betancourt or José López? They need a CF… would they take Pie straight up?
"I've never complained about it. I'm thankful to have a jersey." Mark DeRosa, 22 Aug 2007
Piniella for Winn.
Interesting. Been done once before, too.
Don’t think the Giants would go for it, though.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
re: Seattle
Ugh, Betancout and Lopez? I’ll pass on both of them. Yunieksy’s defense has declined, and neither guy is a good offensive player. I’d rather waste Pie’s value than trade for either one of them. Seattle is trying to find more middle infielders. 2nd base, long term, is probably Luis Valbuena’s if he develops.
Now that would be a GREAT Hanukkah present
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
by Doggie Stalker on Dec 5, 2008 5:28 PM CST up reply actions
I want a do-over of the offseason so far
We’ve done nothing to go in one direction or the other.
We haven’t improved (subtracting Wood, adding Gregg)
We haven’t made a step towards building for the future around some of these big contracts (trading away Ceda, throwing away the chance at 4 draft picks by not offering arb to Howry or Wood). We painted ourselves in a corner with the Felix Pie situation by not giving him a full time opportunity last season and having him now out of options.
More than anything I just want an organizational philosophy that is consistent and adhered to. As long as I can remember being a Cubs fan we haven’t had one. The organization has always been run from the bottom-up rather than the top down. There hasn’t been a strong owner placing an emphasis on directing resources into the best areas (scouting, player development, staffing, etc), instead its been funneled into FA contracts for mid-level aging players trying to constantly sell a quick fix.
by DartmouthCubsFan on Dec 5, 2008 1:49 PM CST reply actions
See if there's a trade available for Lars Anderson
If the Red Sox sign Texeira, Anderson will be blocked for the forseeable future. He’s put up some solid numbers in the Minor Leagues and would be a natural fill-in when Lee’s contract expires.
I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg
i doubt
that they will deal Lars. Why would they? That’s a top level prospect there and they don’t have to deal him. We’d have to offer something big in return as well. Who?
Also, they can shift Lars to the OF (although they are deep in the OF as well).
It would take something big
I’m not sure what – the Red Sox system is pretty loaded, but if they signed Texeira, it would block Anderson, theoretically, unless the Sox let Ortiz go in 1-2 years.
I would start with perhaps Lee Hak-ju and trying to go from there. The Sox do need catching help, so perhaps Castillo would intrigue the Red Sox, too.
I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg
re:
They don’t have to use Lars Anderson to get catching help. They can deal from their arm depth if they wanted. Add in Anderson’s athleticism could potentially allow a shift to the OF, at least when he is young, and unless they get a ridiculous return, I’m not sure they’d be all that motivated to move him, and I’m not sure our system is able to offer said ridiculous return . I doubt they’d do Vitters for Anderson.
I don't think they have to use Anderson, either, for catching help
it’s just a position where they haven’t developed prospects as well as they would have liked, which is why Castillo’s name jumped to mind. Would Soto get their attention (not that I’d make that trade, necessarily)?
The Sox are pretty locked down, position-wise, all around the diamond. Anderson could slide into LF for Bay at the end of 2009, if they wanted.
I think they’d be interested in Vitters, depending on what happens this winter. If Teixeira goes elsewhere, then Youkilis is stuck at 1B with Lowell at 3B. Vitters could take Lowell’s spot in 2011, though if I were them, I’d move Youkilis to 3B and Anderson to 1B.
I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg
re:
That’s probably what they will end up doing long run (moving Youk to 3rd).
I’m not saying they wouldn’t have interest in Vitters. I’m just saying that, Vitters, our best chip, probably couldn’t net Lars Anderson on his own.
I don't know that Vitters would, either.
But, since it’s a wish list, I figured I’d go for broke on a guy who could go a long way towards the future competitiveness of the franchise once the current group is gone.
I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg
re: 1st base
Don’t forget about Jovan Rosa. It’s still raw potential, so he needs to develop that real power, but he very well could be an answer for first base come 2011.
Truth be told, I had forgotten about Rosa
If he can develop that raw power, it would be a boon to the minor league system.
I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg
Purely for fun - this is not serious
in terms of i am expecting this. Just for fun.
Trades:
I am increasingly leaning towards the Angels not being able to resign Tex. This doesn’t mean that they will be on the market for a first baseman, as they do have Kendry Morales and Brandon Wood looking for spots. That said, it’s not impossible, so
1. Derrek Lee for Michael Anton, Macier Izturis, and Trevor Bell.
Again, this is just for fun, although there seems to be some effort by Hendry on seriously investigating Peavy. So,
2a. Felix Pie and Michael Wuertz for Ian Kennedy. Yankees get a CF option and pen help. Kennedy was overhyped, but is still a decent mid-end of the rotation projection that is close to ready. I think this is, on the surface, too much for Kennedy, but young pitching can have surprising costs, and to be honest, I’d be fine clearing Wuertz’s salary off if it’s necessary.
2b. Ian Kennedy, Josh Vitters, Ronny Cedeno, Sean Marshall, and Kevin Hart for Jake Peavy. I’m not against trading Vitters, it just has to make sense. I’d be okay with this. Would it be enough? Dunno.
3. Jason Marquis and 3 or 4 million for Billy Buckner. The Diamondbacks have been mentioned, so why not? We cut around 5-6 million off the list, they get their end of the rotation starter, while we get a guy to stretch out and stash in AAA.
FA:
Rafael Furcal. No, this likely won’t happen in real life unless we jump in late, but hey, this isn’t reality. Looks like it’ll take 4 years to net Furcal.
Raul Ibanez: Lefty bat, at a better position than RF.
Joe Beimel – Don’t see this happening in real life either, although I do expect us to sign a pen arm.
C – Soto/Blanco. Personally, I’d save a couple million and let Blanco go, but he’s likely to return.
1st – Raul Ibanez. He should, in terms of AAV for 2009, save us a couple million and he isn’t as big a defensive liability at first.
2nd – Ryan Theriot
SS – Rafael Furcal. Our big ticket signing fills a leadoff void.
3rd – Aramis Ramirez.
RF – Mark DeRosa
CF – Kosuke Fukudome*
LF – Alfonso Soriano
Bench: Mike Fontenot
Bench: Micah Hoffpauir
Bench: Reed Johnson
Bench: Macier Izturis
I don’t really want to stick DeRosa fulltime in RF, but it’s not as if he’s that much worse defensively than some of the names being tossed around.
Lineup:
1. Furcal
2. Theriot
3. Ramirez
4. Ibanez
5. Soriano
6. Soto
7. DeRosa
8. Fukudome/Johnson
SP: Peavy, Zambrano, Harden, Lilly, Dempster
CL: Carlos Marmol
BP: Kevin Gregg, Jeff Samardzija, Chad Gaudin, Angel Guzman, Joe Beimel, and Neal Cotts
I do think we will sign one more pen arm, and probably a lefty. If we got with 1 lefty, I’d probably put Randy Wells in there.
I think this is doable under the payroll requirements.
Again … just for fun. I do not expect any of this to happen. Anyhow, I’ll try and think of other options. Eh … don’t like the outlook of that team, but I spent the time, so might as well post it. Don’t like that pen, but well, don’t expect any huge additions to reshape that pen’s feel for me.
Would you have any interest in Brandon Wood from the Angels?
I realize his star has fallen pretty far, but he’s the same age as Felix Pie. Maybe he needs a change of scenery.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
re:
I’d have interest, but I don’t know if they move him for Lee. That is, I don’t think dealing Lee would net Wood.
Not 1-for-1...
… but maybe in a larger deal.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
Billy Buckner?
Im confused, is there another Billy Buckner in the Dbacks system?
Ian Kennedy is overhyped, he doesnt have a major league breaking ball.
Okay, just so I understand it... in your wildest fantasy, you are in hell. And you are co-running a bed and breakfast with the devil.
re
yes, there is a billy buckner in the dbacks system. he was in the royals system before and they traded alberto callaspo for him. back of the rotation type of guy, although if his stuff rebounds a bit, he’s probably a tiny notch above mitch atkins.
i agree ian kennedy is overhyped. that said, he’s still a potential middle of the rotation projection. Those types either get overhyped (Ian) or underhyped (Sean Gallagher)
You do know....
….it’s redundant to put the “re” in your posts, right?
Whoever said you can't mix business with pleasure never owned a PuttPutt course---Andy Bernard
by carmen_fanzone on Dec 5, 2008 4:31 PM CST up reply actions
For a lefty in the pen
What about Mike Maroth?
I know his numbers aren’t fantastic, but coming off the injury, he’ll come very cheap and could have a huge upside, I think. Probably get him for 1 million base and maybe another million in incentives with a team option for 3 million in 2010 if he stays healthy.
Then, send DLee and Kevin Hart to Tampa for Andy Sonnanstine
Sign Adam Dunn and install him at 1B.
Thanks Santa!
hmm, now that we know a payroll
of about 140-145 million, i’ll have to go take a look to see if this fits. at least we have an idea now, instead of randomly speculating on what is possible.
To win a playoff game.
What to do, with Larry Hughe?
by Rudey on Dec 5, 2008 1:56 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
I'm greedy - I want to win 11 playoff games.
Someday….
Cubs Win!! Cubs Win!
by Ihatethecards on Dec 5, 2008 2:41 PM CST up reply actions
Should have been following the Cubs from 1906 to 1910.
1906 – 2 wins
1907 – 4 wins
1908 – 4 wins
1910 – 1 win
Yes, but now in 1 year
Cubs Win!! Cubs Win!
by Ihatethecards on Dec 5, 2008 2:44 PM CST up reply actions
Yeah
that first one is turning out to be a real doozy.
Boiler up!
by halfblindcubbiegirl on Dec 5, 2008 3:42 PM CST up reply actions
Three simple things
the new owner to say go get Manny, have career years out of our veteran players all at the same time, blow through the playoffs not losing a game.
This is only the beginning....Lou Pinella end of '07 season and Chicago Transit Authority (the band when they were really good).
Break the bank...
and sign C.C. Sabathia. We would have the best staff in baseball and 2 out of every five games we would have hitters 1 through 9. It will never happen but we are talking about Christmas and/or Hannukah gifts.
Another 3 or 4 thousand seats in the bleachers.
Bump park capacity up to around 45K. Then we can really laugh at the BoSox for having that tiny little park.
Where are you going to put those seats?
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
Hey, it's a wish list. Don't burst my bubble. :P
Put ’em on top of the triangle building.
"Well, we're out of cake! We only had three bits and we didn't expect such a rush! So what do you want?"
"What, so my choice is 'or death?' Well, then I'll have the chicken, please."
--Eddie Izzard
That'd be...
… weird.
Plus, I don’t think the triangle building would be tall enough.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
Aramis Ramirez to Cleveland for Grady Sizemore
They need a third baseman, its far, far, far fetched and would probably require some salary to be consumed by the Cubs, but he would be the one guy in the entire league Id want on this team.
Okay, just so I understand it... in your wildest fantasy, you are in hell. And you are co-running a bed and breakfast with the devil.
Send youngsters to TB for Ben Zobrist
Like any two of Pie, Hart, Guzman, Wells, Atkins or those good A-ball pitchers.
Watch Zobrist win significant playing time at SS.
Profit!
Fontenot (fon-te-no): Cajun for "scrappy"
interesting
but dont they want to trade Bartlett instead?
Okay, just so I understand it... in your wildest fantasy, you are in hell. And you are co-running a bed and breakfast with the devil.
Yes, that's the story.
Bartlett will be eligible for arbitration, and Reid Brignac is on his way up soon. I think trading Zobrist could work out for them if they can fill other holes without increasing payroll. Then, they could keep Bartlett for one more year to see if Brignac pans out.
Fontenot (fon-te-no): Cajun for "scrappy"
Theyve got Beckham coming up, so I think theyre both expendable
one before the other, of course. But man, what a deal for TB, get the top overall pick and then go to the Series 4 months later!
Okay, just so I understand it... in your wildest fantasy, you are in hell. And you are co-running a bed and breakfast with the devil.
Beckham
is still iffy on sticking at short. The main reason they’d move Bartlett is because Brignac’s glove has improved enough and Reid should be a better offensive player than Jason. Furthermore, they might save some cash that could be allocated for a big bat.
Hey, then we'd have two Z's on the team - cool!
“Big Z” and “Little Z” – could be our version of Big Poison and LIttle Poison.
Zobrist looks like he could be a pretty decent player. He certainly is a nice enough person, and well-thought of in the Tampa organization and community.
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
To break a certain 9-game losing streak...
Brian McRae's 5 o'clock shadow
by PurpleLineToWrigley on Dec 5, 2008 3:19 PM CST reply actions
End of the road
for Mad Dog. Enjoy the golf course, Greg. My Christmas wish would be him in charge of the Cubs pitchers in a year or two.
"Every player should be accorded the privilege of at least one season with the Chicago Cubs. That's baseball as it should be played - in God's own sunshine. And that's really living." ~Alvin Dark
by DamonBerryhillsMitt on Dec 5, 2008 3:36 PM CST reply actions
Carl Crawford
I know he had a down year last year, but I love the way the guy plays the game.
- He’s nearing the end of his contract, which makes it more likely the Rays would dump him (although he’s relatively cheap, making $5.375 mil last year).
- I think he’d adjust okay to right at Wrigley.
- He could break up the righties in our lineup.
"Pounding sand since 1982...."
Why do you think it's likely the Rays will "dump" Crawford?
I would think he has a great deal of value as there are 2 years of control left on his contract.
Crawford is a 2-way player and can help a team win with both his offense and defense. Personally, that type of player is rare in baseball with a combination of speed, power on offense, and speed on defense.
Hey, it's a new century!
by cowsarecool220 on Dec 5, 2008 4:14 PM CST up reply actions
I don't think it's likely
I said “more likely” not likely, going on to say that he is relatively cheap even for the Rays. This is a wish list right? This guy is wishing, jeez!
I wouldn’t really say he has power on offense, but his bat has a little pop. But you’re right, he is a fun player to watch and guys like him a few and far between.
"Pounding sand since 1982...."
HOF for Santo
Woody back in the closer role, and another crack at the playoffs. We don’t need a different team, we need THIS team to get it’s mojo.
"That’s the great thing about baseball, you never know what’s going to happen till you get the final out." — Lou Piniella
by drewishdrewid on Dec 5, 2008 4:05 PM CST reply actions 2 recs
So true.
"Well, we're out of cake! We only had three bits and we didn't expect such a rush! So what do you want?"
"What, so my choice is 'or death?' Well, then I'll have the chicken, please."
--Eddie Izzard
Id like a 160G PS3 myself
if we’re being realistic
Okay, just so I understand it... in your wildest fantasy, you are in hell. And you are co-running a bed and breakfast with the devil.
How About Brad Hawpe?
Colorado is always looking for pitching - left-handed bat with pop — averaged 25 HRs over the last 3 years. Hit .283 in ’08. He does K a bit too much but Perry has done well with Cub batters and being a bit more patient.
Any combination that Hendry could come up with to satisfy their wants.
Hawpe is what the Cubs are looking for -
Looking around in both leagues at teams who have this type of player the pickings are very slim. Hawpe could be the man.
Thatd be nice, especially if they get Delmon Young
they might view him as expendable, but that would probably depend on whether or not they keep Atkins
Okay, just so I understand it... in your wildest fantasy, you are in hell. And you are co-running a bed and breakfast with the devil.
Santo in the HOF.
2. Wood back ( Tigers my gut feeling)
3. Sign Abreu
4. Theriot, Pie and Marshall for Escobar, Braves SS.
"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"
I wish for
excellent health, and no stints on the Disabled List for Cub players, coaches, and fans here at BCB.
Hey Lou, we're long overdue.
Playing around with some numbers
Okay, while most of us guessed a payroll in the 140-145 million range, this Sullivan article story was the first time in the media that I saw that listed, at least, from what I recall this offseason.
Anyhow, we’ve gone down this road before, but just playing around with some numbers. With our current 36 man roster (and the buyout of Henry Blanco) of
Pitchers: Z, Harden, Lilly, Dempster, Marquis, Samardzija, Gregg, Wuertz, Gaudin, Cotts, R. Hill, Marmol, Guzman, Hart, Wells, Mateo, Marshall, Berg, Atkins, Ascaino
Position players: Soto, Lee, DeRosa, Theriot, Ramirez, Fukudome, Soriano, Johnson, K. Hill, Cedeno, Fontenot, Pie, Snyder, Hoffpauir, Fuld, Fox
I come to around, after estimating some numbers, around 135-137 million. For those that have been wondering why the talk has been heavier on Ibanez so far than guys like Dunn, that might be your explanation (Dunn’s might land around 10-12 million, which may be too rich for us, whereas Ibanez might come in a little under.)
After looking at the numbers
a) I’ve said all offseason I’m fine with Hank White going, and after looking at the numbers again, I think he needs to go unless he takes the minimum. Just doesn’t work for our budget. He’s been great, and I’ll be fine if we somehow bring him back, but if you gotta save some cash, this is one place to go. It’s the backup catcher.
b) Wuertz needs to go. Not because he’s been bad, but because that million plus could become useful. Same with Cotts. That’s probably 2 million or so in savings.
c) I’ve got a hard time seeing us make more than 2 additions. Even a Peavy and a bat addition stretches us to the edges of our budget, assuming that a team will eat most of Marquis’ contract in a trade. That leaves me wondering about the pen. I still think we need one more arm, probably a lefty, and I’m not sure our system has the answers in place.
Okay, so
i) We need to dump Marquis. It needs to be cost-cutting as the priority, the return package as a secondary factor. Sure, an average starter that eats innings and is on an affordable contract should net a decent return, and if it is possible, great. If this ends up being some PTBNL, as long as the opposing team eats the majority of the deal, fine by me.
ii) A positive, realistic scenario in dumping Marquis probably has us eating around 3 million. That’s a positive scenario, IMO (meaning we cut around 6-7 million off). It could be worse, but I think that’s doable. If we get rid of Marquis/Wuertz/Cotts off the table, that’s potentially , that gives us some more flexibility. Even then, we’re looking at 125-128 million with the remaining 33. The question is … do we need to make more cuts, and where? We run into a roadblock, because the only assets that seem semi-realistic to move that could provide savings would be the valuable Mark DeRosa and Derrek Lee, and Lee won’t be easy to move with his NTC.
Looking at some scenarios, assuming the three pitching cuts I’ve mentioned
1. The Peavy addition – Say we complete a Peavy deal. That leaves us perhaps 10 million. Probably enough to land a key bat.
2. The Other Veteran Pitcher Route – Say Randy Johnson. Let’s estimate Johnson at 8 million for now. Just a rough guess. That extra savings would be perhaps enough to land a LOOGY.
3. The internal option – Use Marshall/Gaudin/Atkins whomever in the 5th role. We’ll live through the first half of the year. That gives us the flexibility to nab our preferred bat if it comes down to money, while perhaps landing either a 2nd bat or a pen arm, if not both, and/or saving us some payroll flexibility for midseason.
Of course, there is the “Trade Lee” scenarios that are being thrown out (and I threw a ‘for fun’ one out above). I’m not a “we have to deal Lee” guy, but rather a “i’m open to any ideas guy”. Clearing DeRosa’s 5.5 needs to be pondered, as much as I love DeRosa. The idea, in terms of chatter, this offseason has been that adding one bat will change the makeup of the lineup. Well, it could, a bit, but if clearing DeRosa’s 5.5 allows us to get middle of the order lefty and top of the order guy, that would really reshape the team.
Anyhow, just some late at night thoughts.
well
The A’s have moved on from Furcal … for now. They gave him 4 years but asked him to take a significantly less AAV (Rosenthal said 35-40 mil was the package).
I’m still of the belief that adding a top of the order guy should be as important as adding a middle of the order lefty. With the Giants having signed Renteria and the A’s moving on for now, this opens up the Furcal door a bit more.
I still believe that Furcal will take years and a slightly lesser AAV than his last contract, but he won’t take a significant AAV drop, as the A’s wanted so far. I really would like to see if he’d listen to say, a 4 year deal, somewhere from 40-48 mil. I’d be okay with that. Such a move would create a trade chip in DeRosa, Theriot, or Fontenot, all three of whom could be useful in landing us a key piece. Heck, we could shop both DeRosa and Theriot if push came to shove (with Fontenot at 2nd, and adding a utility player that can play short, but could also fill in at 2nd if need be). I am fine turning it over to Fontenot, much as I love DeRosa. Having the flexibility to shop DeRosa or Theriot could also help in trying to put a package together for Peavy, and removing DeRosa’s contract, on top of say, Marquis/Wuertz/Cotts, could perhaps allow us to the flexibility to net say, Furcal, Peavy, and perhaps an arm or a bat(Furcal would be the one big ticket item we can do right now, and clearing DeRosa/Marquis/Wuertz/Cotts could give us around 14-15 mil, take Peavy’s 11.5 out of there, that leaves very little left, but perhaps enough to swing a trade for a cost-controlled young OF or a cheaper veteran).
Just some thoughts.
one more thought
If we added Furcal and cleared DeRosa’s contract (contiued from the end of the last paragraph), it could allow us to go Furcal and a middle of the order bat. I mean, I’m not huge on adding Dunn, but for those that are big on adding him, we might be able to. Adding those two, and say, Fontenot, would really reshape this lineup.
If we can clear Lee, then obviously, the opportunities grow by a lot.
It seems to me that if Furcal comes in, the Cubs will trade DeRosa
because they’ve generally shown a preference for Theriot over DeRosa. A middle infield of Furcal and Theriot with Fontenot hanging around gives you the option of going back to Theriot – Fontenot if Furcal gets injured as well as having Fontenot slide into more and more of a platoon if he continues to have a 50% higher OPS than Theriot.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Dec 6, 2008 8:03 AM CST up reply actions
I've always thought the Cubs were in on Furcal
I’ve even thought Kinzer had Furcal waiting because the Cubs were waiting on a few things.
I had begun to doubt my earlier claim that Furcal would be the Cubs top off-season priority, but I am coming back around to that. We shall see.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Dec 6, 2008 7:49 AM CST up reply actions
Just curious...
what makes you think that? just a hunch?
2008 National League Central Division Champs!!!!!
With 145 the Cubs can do a lot.
If we trade Harden in a 3-way for Peavy, as well as dumping Marquis to give the 5 spot to Marshall, we save about 2 M give or take a M. That leaves us enough to get any LH bat we want. There are a few major purchase plans I see:
1. Premiere LH bat.
2. Low end LH bat + Furcal
3. Traded LH bat + Furcal + Kerry Wood
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Dec 6, 2008 7:47 AM CST up reply actions
So not going to happen, but it was fun coming up with it
Based on the speculated 140-145 million budget, Furcal’s shrinking market, and Wittenmeyer’s suggestion that Hendry is being more creative than before, along with my aforementioned comments, with full recognition that if this happens, then I shoud’ve gone to Vegas as the complexities behind making everything happen exactly as desired in an open market would be nearly impossible to coordinate. I took some rough guesses on salary increases, so I may end up being off, but the following team I came up comes close to the 140-145 range given by Sullivan. Actually, I think, when you factor in the smaller pieces not included, we’d pass 145, but barely (maybe around 147 or 148. If that’s a big issue, then chop Rivera off and slide Brad Snyder in there, I guess.
Trades:
1a. Felix Pie and Ryan Theriot for Garrett Olson and George Sherrill
Did Sherrill overachieve to start, or did his injury hamper his 2nd half effectiveness? It’s probably somewhere in the middle, but he’d be a solid LOOGY option. Baltimore still lacks a shortstop, and while Theriot is, at best, an average fielder (and that’s being nice)
a) The FO knows him
b) He’s better than what they have
c) There’s still speculation on Roberts being dealt. If Roberts is dealt, they could use Theriot at 2nd. We’ll know real soon about Roberts and whether or not he will be moved, as an answer on that should come at the winter meetings, or soon thereafter.
If we have to add a fringe 3rd chip, fine.
1b. Jake Peavy for Josh Vitters, Ronny Cedeno, Sean Marshall, Kevin Hart and
Garrett Olson.
I’m not saying I love it, but I’d be okay with it. I’m not against dealing Vitters – I’m against haphazardly trading. If it makes sense for us, and making sense means from a total organizational perspective, then yes, we pull the trigger. The above 2 part, 3 team deal boils down to, for us,
Felix Pie, Ryan Theriot, Josh Vitters, Ronny Cedeno, Sean Marshall, and Kevin Hart for George Sherrill and Jake Peavy. I think I’m okay with that.
2. Derrek Lee for Macier Izturis, Michael Anton, and Mason Tobin
It looks like the chances of Texeira not resigning in Anaheim is growing. They do have internal options, with potential sluggers in Kendry Morales and Brandon Wood long waiting for an opportunity. That said, they may explore a trade for a veteran, and Lee makes sense, from a contract and cost perspective. I don’t think they’d sell the farm for him, and this is a very iffy package built more on potential, but Lee does have some control with his NTC so I factored that in.
3. Jason Marquis and 4 million for Doug Slaten and Bryan Augenstein
The Diamondbacks have been rumored with Marquis, along with other clubs like the Royals, Rockies, Reds, and Mets. Short of it is, I’d try to target a LOOGY in the deal, along with perhaps another average piece. Augenstein is a middle-back of the rotation projection that might start in AA next year, adding some depth to our upper levels. The 4 mil is based of Wittenmeyer’s comments.
4. Move Wuertz/Cotts to clear salary.
Signings
1. Rafael Furcal – Estimate 4 years/44 million
2. Adam Dunn – Estimate 3 years/36 million, but slightly backloaded
3. Juan Rivera – Estimate 1 year, 2 million
C: Geovany Soto
1st: Adam Dunn
2nd: Mike Fontenot
SS: Rafael Furcal
3rd: Aramis Ramirez
RF: Mark DeRosa
CF: Kosuke Fukudome
LF: Alfonso Soriano
Bench: Koyie Hill, Micah Hoffpauir, Reed Johnson, Macier Izturis, Juan Rivera
SP: Zambrano, Peavy, Harden, Lilly, Dempster
BP: Marmol, Gregg, Samardzija, Guzman, Wells, Slaten, Sherrill
Lineup:
1. Furcal
2. Fontenot
3. Ramirez
4. Dunn
5. Soriano
6. Soto
7. Fukudome
8. DeRosa (I would rather not go Furcal/Fontenot, but I don’t see DeRosa hitting at the top, when Reed Johnson is in CF, perhaps he goes up there … and I don’t see us putting Fukudome in the 8 spot, so I slid DeRosa down)
I think this addresses
a) top of the order
b) Lefty in the middle
c) The pen (adding Sherrill to the mix)
d) Oh, there’s that Peavy guy.
Given that both LA teams appear to be losing their 2008 mid-season added sluggers
I’d really like to market Alfonso Soriano to both of them instead of Derrek Lee. If we can get Furcal to lead-off and we can replace Soriano’s bat with Dunn, the only thing we have to get in a Soriano trade is 1) salary relief and 2) enough back in the trade to convince Soriano to waive his NTC.
Imagine what we could do financially if Ned accepted this deal:
Alfonso Soriano and Ryan Theriot
for
Andre Ethier and Chin-Lung Hu
Then we can add Hu into the Peavy trade and we’ve saved 16 M, 11-12 of which goes to Furcal to play SS. But because we’ve already got Ethier as a middle of the order LH bat, we don’t have to pay in on Dunn or Ibanez (which we still could, especially with LF open), but rather we have the lineup freedom to look at Hermida types.
Furcal SS
Hermida LF
Lee 1B
Ramirez 3B
Ethier RF
Soto C
Fukudome CF
DeRosa 2B
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Dec 6, 2008 8:19 AM CST up reply actions
I've got a hard time
seeing either team take on Soriano’s contract and giving up a quality piece like Ethier.
It's definitely a long-shot
but
1) the Dodgers want a name-impact bat in the same way we did when we signed Soriano.
2) Soriano is a better hitter than Ethier. We just like Ethier because he’s cheap and LH.
3) the Dodgers need a SS and are just the team to over-value Theriot.
4) depending on how they view Pierre, they may be in the market for a lead-off hitter, too.
5) the Dodgers really shouldn’t be playing Kemp in CF, and they should pick Kemp over Ethier.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Dec 6, 2008 9:47 AM CST up reply actions
I'd argue
1. Dodgers talk about adding big names, but they’ve largely been committed to their top youngsters.
2. Torre had Soriano … and I don’t remember Torre being a huge fan of Soriano, although I could be wrong here.
3. Is Soriano better? Even if he is, is he better by enough to justify the financial differences. The only caveat here would be if you think Ethier won’t repeat his performance, partly due to luck, and partly due to if Manny leaves.
4. Dodgers the type of team to overvalue Theriot? I’d disagree with that. I think Theriot would get overvalued by “Moneyball” teams, and Colletti is definitely not a Moneyball guy.
5. They do value defense at short, and at the end of the day, if they can’t land Jack Wilson, they very well may turn it over to Chin-lung Hu while waiting on top prospect Ivan DeJesus.
6. They do need a leadoff hitter, assuming Furcal is gone. I’m not sure how they address that in this market.
7. Long run, Kemp should be in a corner OF role. That said … Ethier was more valuable to them down the stretch as a bat, and Torre isn’t likely to forget that. Furthermore, I’m actually fairly certain Kemp’s defensive ability last year in CF was solid. Finally, I’m not sure Juan Pierre is a big factor for them, so they could target a CF (and perhaps leadoff option) if they really wanted to move Kemp to a corner OF spot.
______________________________________________
If I had to take a stab at the Dodgers offseason right now …
1. I think they’ll do everything they can to land a starter. They lost Lowe, leaving them a lot of young arms (MacDonald, Kershaw, Billingsley) along with Kuroda. They need one more starter. They won’t go into the year depending on Schmidt, and they might not want MacDonald and Kershaw in the rotation, so it may be two guys they are looking for. Personally, I’d give Kuo one more look in the rotation, but that likely won’t happen. I still think they’ll make a run at Sabathia, but if not, I think they could go the Randy Johnson route and go after another mid-end of the rotation type starter. I think this is priority one for them, addressing the pitching.
2. I think the 2nd priority is figuring out power. I think that’s a bigger need than a leadoff hitter. There isn’t much right now, with Loney/Kemp/Ethier/Martin anchoring the middle of that lineup. Blake Dewitt being at 3rd doesn’t help the equation. I don’t think they have the financial capability or desire to handle a big contract UNLESS they clear off Jason Schmidt, Andruw Jones, or Juan Pierre, and perhaps they would need to clear off two of them. I thinkt hey may pursue similar targets to us – Ibanez/Abreu/Dunn perhaps. Abreu might make some sense in LF if Joe likes him.
3. After that, I think they need to figure out the middle infield. Looks like Dewitt will move to third. They have Tony Abreu coming back, along with Chin-hung Lu. They’ll add someone here. Orlando Cabrera? I don’t know if they want to fork over a pick, but I could see this potentially. A trade?
oh one other dodgers thought
they could resign blake at third, keep dewitt at 2nd (Joe seems to like him). Don’t know where that leadoff hitter will come from, though.
Arguing back in good fun
1. The Dodgers want big names mixed in with the youngsters and Kent’s leaving. Part-vet, part-youth has been Ned’s modus operendi.
3. Soriano is definitely better. Ethier was over his head the last part of the season and the Dodgers know it. The Dodgers traded LaRoche to get Manny; trading Ethier for Soriano is a similar kind of decision.
4. “Moneyball” teams tend to value defense now and are statistically savvy enough to know that Theriot doesn’t project well going forward. The guy who gave Juan Pierre that fat contract is just the guy to take Theriot (both noodle-armed, range-deficient guys whose value is based on their hard-working reps and SB totals).
5. You won’t convince me they value defense at SS when they played Nomar there 31 games last year. Additionally, they played DeWitt at 2B, Kemp in CF, Manny in the field, etc. This isn’t a team that worries about defense. Plus, they don’t like Hu.
6. Pierre could be their lead-off hitter. Otherwise, Theriot fills two needs for them. Trade them Theriot!
As for the Dodgers’ off-season
1. I’d go for Kuo, too, but Randy Johnson seems to fit them well. I could also see them surprising and landing CC. Ned’s got money to spend and he’ll spend it.
2. If they couldn’t handle a big contract, they wouldn’t be salivating over Manny.
3. O-Cab makes a lot of sense for them, although I personally think O-Cab is not half as good as his reputation.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Dec 6, 2008 1:14 PM CST up reply actions
crap, i deleted a long post
1. Ned’s MO has been stopgap veterans. Of all his bad deals, the only really bad one was Pierre. There have been indications that he’s been ordered to make some deals by ownership.
2. There are metrics that suggest Ethier was as good, if not better, than soriano in 2008. Even if you buy Soriano as better (and I do), the question is still – is he better by enough to justify the financial differences?
3. Every indication this offseason has been that they are placing value on defense at short, unless the player is too good to pass up. Again, outside of the Pierre contract, what other really bad deal has Colletti made? A noodle-armed CF is also more livable than a noodle-armed shortstop.
4. Don’t be surprised if Hu is the starting shortstop for the Dodgers come opening day. They don’t dislike him that much – if they have enough offense, they’ll go with the glove and wait on DeJesus. Kemp and DeWitt aren’t ideal long run CF’s and 2nd basemen, but in 2008, they were solid defensively. As for shortstop, what other options did they have? I’m not defending Nomar there, but once Furcal went down, what else? Hu didn’t hit, DeJesus wasn’t ready, Abreu was injured. They eventually signed Berroa and they tried a bunch of other stopgaps. Trades are easier said than done. As for Manny, well a lot of teams would give up that defense for his bat. Actually, heck, I’d live with his defense in RF … and I mean that in all honesty, if we could land his bat. He’s the only one I’d make that huge exception for without a 2nd thought, but it wouldn’t happen anyways.
5. Doesn’t your Pierre comment (that he could be their leadoff hitter) somewhat defeat the purpose of some of your arguments behind them making a deal? It would allow Kemp to go to LF, and it would give them a leadoff option. Anyways, most indications are that Pierre won’t be a regular in 2009 unless he earns it (by being extremely lucky). Torre soured on him. I think Pierre will be coming off the bench.
6. I don’t see why so few people have put CC with the Dodgers. To me, it makes perfect sense, provided the Dodgers can work out their financial concerns (west coast/NL). They need the CC thing to drag on a bit, and the Brewers upping their offer to 6 years will help with that.
7. Are they salivating over Manny? Most indications were that the 2 year deal was a public gesture. You can live with a 2 year deal for Manny. I’m not even sure there have been serious negotiations since then, and there has been speculation that Manny might take the arbitration offer since he might not find a long term deal. Salivating over Manny would be giving him a 3rd, or 4th, year, and no one has indicated that has happened, at least, not that I recall. Furthermore, giving Manny a big 2 year deal is far different than trading for Soriano and taking his contract on because, well, less committment and you keep Ethier.
Ok
1. Nomar’s deal wasn’t good; ownership hasn’t changed.
2. If the Dodgers are willing to put Manny in LF, they should be willing to put Sori in LF. Deciding to sign Manny already means blocking one of Kemp/Ethier or continuing to play Kemp out of position. Remember, they’re also getting Theriot in the deal, so you’re giving them one-stop-shopping for the off-season. Finally, if I was in the Dodgers’ position, I’d try and sell high on Ethier.
3. I thought the Dodgers were connected to Renteria. Also, they may not think Theriot’s that bad at SS. There are people who believe that, amazingly enough.
4. I will be surprised, but you did warn me. You ask what options they had other than Nomar – they had Hu. Sure he wasn’t hitting, but he could have busted out. Now, if they didn’t think he would hit, why would their opinion be different today?
5. Saying Pierre could be their lead-off hitter is nothing more than me admitting a lot of ignorance when it comes to Dodger plans. My trade suggestion, remember, assumes they’ll be shopping for a lead-off hitter.
7. I thought I read Gammons say the Dodgers were desperate for Manny. I could be mis-remembering.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Dec 6, 2008 2:27 PM CST up reply actions
another counter
1. The suggestion has been made that some of the big name signings were ordered by McCourt. In sayinig that … sure Nomar wasn’t a good deal, but was it terrible? A two year gamble to see if a former batting champ can find his stroke is livable.
2. What if the Dodgers buy Ethier’s development? It’s not a bad buy – 3 years of OPS above .800 and a sweet stroke. Anyhow, as for the rest
a) They might not sign Manny (going in line with the bottom discussion)
b) Kemp’s defense wasn’t as bad as you make it out to be. I’m pretty certain that RZR had him above average in CF.
c) Manny vs. Sori is a different animal – Long term financial commitment and giving up a quality young talent vs. a short term commitment and keeping said young talent.
It isn’t a question of their willingness to stick him in LF. If they did add Sori, I think he would go to LF. It’s a question, for me, if this trade makes any sense for them to do. Furthermore, one equation that hasn’t been addressed is that Theriot’s offensive production might slip.
sorry hit enter
let’s see
3. I don’t recall that as anything more than writer speculation (I think I read it in some LA paper where the guy said something like, Renteria is a FA, will we go after him?), but it’s possible. Would they sacrifice some defense for the right offensive piece? Perhaps. The biggest rumors have focused on Jack Wilson.
But the counters deal with this trade. So … you are the Dodgers. a 2 year, short term deal on Renteria, you keep Ethier, and you keep some financial flexibility for an organization that supposedly needs it. Or Soriano, Theriot? Everything we’ve discussed on the deal revolves around Soriano vs. Ethier and whether or not you think Soriano is
a) Better
b) that much better to justify the financial differences.
4. I don’t think their opinion on Hu’s offense has changed. He was always a fringe bet to hit, dating back to his first stint in Jacksonville when he tried to force patience. That said … do you remember their offense after Furcal went down? It was a mess. They tried Hu. Had they had enough offense, I think they might’ve kept Hu, although that’s a guess and Hu really was that bad.
Basically
I view Ethier as an .825 OPS guy who should be platooned with a reputation as something more. If the Dodgers view him as that, then Soriano is a clear upgrade. If they don’t you’re probably right. I’m not trying to cut the conversation short, but mostly, that’s what this seems to boil down to.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
by DGU on Dec 6, 2008 6:54 PM CST up reply actions
I agree that's what it boils down to
We’ve spent a few posts basically discussing the value of Ethier in relation to the cost differences that this deal would entail, along with some side points.
I’m not too keen on using straight OPS as a judgment in this situation. First, I’m not disagreeing with you in that I think Soriano is a better offensive player right now. But the general question that needs to be asked is whether or not his offensive production warrants making this deal and getting stuck with a long term contract at the same time. Using OPS as a measure here, is a 50 point difference in OPS worth the significant financial differences between the two players, along with adding Theriot and Hu into the mix? You sort of make an .825 OPS sound bad. If Ethier had an .825 OPS last year, he would’ve ranked 27th out of all qualified outfielders. Definitely starting caliber, even despite his splits. Futhermore, one should probably factor in the defensive differences between the two players, as I think most would put Ethier slightly ahead of Soriano as a defensive outfielder. Is the significant financial differences worth it, even if you think Ethier is limited to what he is right now?
Put it this way, if this situation was reversed and we had Ethier and Hu and they were trying to trade us Soriano and Theriot, would you make that deal? I wouldn’t. The cost of Soriano’s contract vs. the, at best, even with your .825 OPS, 50 or so point difference in OPS ? I’d prefer to keep Ethier in that situation, particularly since he is just entering his peak, whereas Soriano is coming down (and noticeably, Soriano’s offensive performance is on a decline). Now, I think Bill James and Marcel’s predictions on Soriano in 2009 is probably a bit low (predicting a .851 and .854 OPS), but for the most part, Soriano’s ending his peak so any improved numbers is likely a byproduct of an anomalous year or a lot of luck, and considering the contract, it makes the situation even murkier. (For comparison’s sake, Marcel predicts .838 OPS for Ethier in 09, while James predicts .867. If I had to take an honest stab at it right now, I’d go about .845 as a guess for Ethier, with Soriano at, say, .870).
Another factor, then, is how much $$$ is an issue
because there’s a certain philosophy that whoever gets the best player in the deal wins – and Soriano is the best player.
I don’t mean to downplay Ethier too far calling him an .825 OPS player. He’s good. He’s an asset at his current price for any team.
But he’s not a star and it’s not easy to get stars. There are a lot of reasons not to trade for Sori’s contract. There are a lot of reasons not to trade Ethier. I see exactly where you’re coming from. I don’t expect this to happen.
Basically I’m hoping Ned is desperate for a ready-now star.
The author of this post is not a certified scout, doctor, agent, statistician, manager, or journalist, nor was he ever a very good player, though he tried very hard to be like Ryne Sandberg and was about as scrappy as it gets (in T-ball). Any opinion expressed above should in no way be confused with fact, truth, or reality and is hereby qualified in the following ways: 1) The author does not know as much about baseball as Lou Piniella. 2) The author does not know as much about baseball as Jim Hendry. 3) The author does not know as much about baseball as either Dusty or Darren Baker.
man you guys sure write a lot... ;-)
too much to digest in one sitting, but what I got out of all that was I think you both are undervaluing Ethier. He was good before Manny, and he’s gonna get better, with or without Manny. If I’m Ned, I don’t trade Ethier or Kemp, I drop a bundle on CC, keep the 2 year offer for Manny on the table but don’t hold my breath, and then wait for a FA bargain or two in outfield or 3B.
Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."
If we could get someone to take Soriano's contract
what kind of salary space would that give us? before signing furcal and trading for peavy. sorry not a numbers guy
2008 National League Central Division Champs!!!!!
well
put it this way – i estimated the current 36 man roster around 135-137. Wittenmeyer has estimated 133 in his sun-times article. So, somewhere from 133-137. Soriano’s contract is 16 mil, so that means we’d be sitting at 117-121. Meaning, if that 145 is the ceiling, then we’ve got around 24-28 mil available before making any cuts.
Playing this game out some more – Peavy is at 11.5 I think, and let’s estimate Furcal at my 11 for now. That’s 22.5, leaving us 1.5-5.5 available. BUT … let’s say we chop off the Marquis contract, eating 4 million, meaning a 5.875 saving, meaning that we would have 7.375-11.275 mil. We’d be able to add an OF with that money, probably Ibanez instead of, say, Dunn/Abreu, as Ibanez is likely to be cheaper. Let’s estimate 8 for Ibanez, leaving, at best, a few million left. Of course, that means we would still have one OF holes and an overload of middle infielders. We could slide DeRosa fulltime to RF, or deal DeRosa in an affort to make another move. The other option would be a cheap, cost-controlled RF (say. Hermida – but do we have the pieces?). The other thought would be a cheap stopgap RF like Juan Rivera, but that doesn’t address the likely MI overload, so we would probably have to ship someone off anyways.
Anyhow, some random possibilities.
If Lee is tradeable
why not stick with Z, Harden, Demp, Lilly, and Marshall (If Marquis can be moved) and go after Texeira. If you could move Lee and Marquis and not trade for Peavy could you afford Texeira and Furcal. If that would be possible i like that more than anything. A top of the order guy and the best middle of the order Lefty in the game.
2008 National League Central Division Champs!!!!!
i'm not sure
that moving Lee and Marquis would be enough to allow us to net Texeira and Furcal. There’s a chance that Tex and Furcal get about 29 mil or so in 2009 (estimating 18 in 2009 for Tex and 11 for Furcal). If we can fit your scenario, it would be very borderline. Lee and Marquis, well, unless someone eats the entire Marquis deal, which seems unlikely, might free around 18-19 mil (13 on Lee around 5 or 6 on Marquis).
That said, Lee has a NTC, so trading him won’t be easy.
Two quick thoughts...
Maddux retired today. Can we please sign him as our pitching coach and let Larry Rothschild move on. Why we just signed Larry to a new LT deal is beyond me. Greg is a winner with a winner’s mind set and work ethic and we need that!
As for a trade, I would look at the Orioles. They have two young up & coming RFs and they can’t keep (or afford to sign long-term contracts) both. Just a thought…
I am willing to move DLee if he will let himself be traded and have DeRo at first until Hoffpauer grows into the position. There are plenty of teams that have gone to the WS with only average fielding first basemen. What is key it seems, is solid fielding up the middle. That is why moving DeRo to first would make sense. Again, look to the Orioles and Brian Roberts to plug our hole at 2B. That guy is a human vacuum cleaner at second.
I would look to the Orioles to fill our needs at 2B and RF. There is a GM there that Henry can work with. Thoughts?
"When you are in a hole, stop digging." - anon.
"Until Hoffpauir grows into the position"...
… exactly how long do you think this will be? He’s already almost 29.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
actually, I am fine with DeRo at first
as I said. many teams get to the WS with average fielding first basemen and I think DeRo is a better leader than DLee. I personally don’t care about Hoffpauer one way or another, I was just throwing a bone out there to those who love his hitting stats.
"When you are in a hole, stop digging." - anon.
much as i love maddux
he needs some coaching experience before we fork over the job. for all the talk about him being a good mentor, being a coach and a mentor are two different things. maybe he can do it right away, as some are capable of, but i doubt teams will fork over a mlb pitching coach position to him right away.
as for the orioles, they may move roberts, depending on what roberts indicates to them on his willingness to sign long term, but they will likely sign markakis long term, and adam jones is cost-controlled and not yet at arbitration. the only other of that i can think of would be nolan reimold, but there’s no need for us to go that route. the thing about the orioles is, they have money. angelos has spent before. markakis is the franchise player, and i don’t see him getting moved anytime soon.
What about going after Texeira?
Power hitting switch hitter? (IF Lee is traded-which is really unfathomable)
"Hey-Hey! Home Run! Attaboy Ronnie!" ~ Jack Brickhouse
That'd be the only way...
… because Teixeira is a 1B. He’s likely to wind up with an AL team where he can DH part time.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx
My trade
The entire Cub’s system +$250,000,000 for the entire Tampa system.
Long term problems solved, lots of financial flexibility, and we get Carl Crawford to boot!
by 100 Years is Nothing on Dec 6, 2008 10:36 AM CST reply actions
Get Adam Dunn, trade Marquis for a solid bullpen arm, then sign
a couple more arms that can compete for the 5th starter. really want a quality left hander for the bullpen as well, don’t trust Cotts
Every player should be accorded the privilege of at least one season with the Chicago Cubs. That's baseball as it should be played - in God's own sunshine. And that's really living."
Al, a woman I know asked me to tell you this:
“Darlin’ Al, no matter what kind of slider he has, I don’t think the guy in the photo on your post would be a good for a team without a roof to the ball park. The scouting reports say he also comes with a lot of rain, dear.”
Merry Christmas.
"Any old kind of a run wins it!"--Jack Brickhouse
My list
Takers for Marquis and Soriano.
For Theriot to repeat his ‘08 numbers while channeling Ozzie Smith in the field. (I’d say a new SS, but there doesn’t appear to be anyone available I like.)
Wood to be resigned, never go to the DL again, and retire a Cub.
For Harden to take the ball every five days.
For lack of better ideas, Brad Hawpe or a healthy Jeremy Hermida. (If I get the first item on the list, let’s just take both.)
For Kosuke to hit like everyday’s opening day.
For Rich Hill to come back and pitch with the kind of success he teased us with at times. (I miss the crazy sucker.)
For Pie to be traded for somebody useful, and to flourish in his new home.
For a farm system that churns out quality ML talent instead of trade/cannon fodder.
For an end to 7th inning stretch guest conductors.
HOF calls for Santo and Dawson.
And that guy from San Diego wouldn’t hurt my feelings, either.

by 





















