Projections too optimistic
I have all kinds of respect for Al, and I absolutely support the need for optimism regarding a franchise that hasn't won a championship in 100 years.
Still, I have to say, Al's player projections (I'm referring to his original ones, not the combined averages of everyone who's made predictions) share one characteristic: Too optimistic.
Just looking at the eight hitters he's profiled so far (Soto, Fukodome, Lee, Pie, Soriano, Theriot, Ramirez, DeRosa) I notice that he doesn't predict anyone to have an off year. Not only that - he's forecasting what I'd consider career or nearly career years for Lee, Ramirez and Soriano, and is expecting Fukodome to have no trouble at all adjusting to a new league/new country (maybe this is possible - but then again, he may not be the second coming of Ichiro).
In sum, Al expects these 8 players to combine for 171 homers (and this is including Theriot, Pie and Soto - none of whom have demonstrated much power in the MLB so far). That means the Cubs as a team will hit well over 200 homers. I hope so. But I wouldn't count on it after the team combined for just 151 last year and only added one offensive player of any note during the offseason. He also says not a single one of these players will hit under .275. I'd love to see that, believe me. But I don't think it's going to happen. I particularly have my doubts whether Pie can go from .215 to .275. I hope - believe me - but I have doubts.
The pitching projections also seem too optimstic, though a bit more restrained. I suppose we can hope Zambrano's ERA falls by almost 50 points from last year, and that Hill develops into one of the elite pitchers in the NL (as Al's projections predict), but then again, what are the odds of both of those things happening the same year?
I hope Al is right. If he is, it will be one exciting summer. But on the other hand, one has to expect at least a few players to have off years in 2008. If all the players perform as Al is predicting, the Cubs have no excuse not to go all the way.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation, Bleed Cubbie Blue, or Al Yellon, editor-in-chief. FanPost opinions are, however, valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
0 recs |
29
comments
Comments
on the Big 3
on aramis, i dont know why one would expect him to have less than a stellar year. he's the most consistent offensive player on the team and is still in his prime.
most "experts" are more optimistic on cubs players than, felix pie is just one (look at the sig below) that the experts feel will do better than most cubs fans, Al included.
i think its easy to see why people would be optimistic about rich hill improving after his first full season in the league.
if Al was the only person projecting these optimistic stats, thatd be one thing, but the truth is that most experts have been even MORE optimistic than some cubs fans.
get optimistic, one hell of a year ahead of us hopefully.
by kylejo on Feb 25, 2008 3:06 PM CST 0 recs
I'm not saying
by danimal15 on
Feb 25, 2008 8:55 PM CST
up
0 recs
why are you bothered by it?
by Chanman25 on Feb 25, 2008 3:16 PM CST 0 recs
So sayeth the Dude.
by santoswoodenlegs on Feb 25, 2008 3:21 PM CST 0 recs
thats just hillarious
by kylejo on
Feb 25, 2008 3:30 PM CST
up
0 recs
I hope you're all correct
I will try to get more optimistic. It is spring, after all (almost)
by danimal15 on Feb 25, 2008 3:30 PM CST 0 recs
Remember, though....
by ctcoff99 on Feb 25, 2008 3:51 PM CST 0 recs
Exactly.
by Al on
Feb 25, 2008 4:14 PM CST
up
0 recs
Soto's power
While it's a small sample size, Soto demonstrated significant power in his appearances with the Cubs last year.
54 AB/6 2B/3 HR/.389/.433/.667
by John Q Freejazz on Feb 25, 2008 4:20 PM CST 0 recs
Right.
by Al on
Feb 25, 2008 4:25 PM CST
up
0 recs
I agree
by Thelonious on
Feb 25, 2008 4:31 PM CST
up
0 recs
Right.
by Al on
Feb 25, 2008 4:34 PM CST
up
0 recs
Yes...yes...yes...this so true!
by santoswoodenlegs on
Feb 25, 2008 4:37 PM CST
up
0 recs
Not in toto
Stephen Covey's "Begin with the end in mind" principle simply does not apply here. If you take an aggregate approach, then it stands to reason at some point you are going to have to back into some of your projections to make things 'fit'. And that kinda defeats the purpose. Not to mention the fun.
by ballhawk on Feb 25, 2008 4:25 PM CST 0 recs
The thing that
I don't see anything wrong with it. We are fans and why not.
by wild bill on Feb 25, 2008 4:50 PM CST 0 recs
So far the community forecasts as a whole...
But let's say that Al's forecasts are a bit rosy. So what?
Analysts everywhere are seeing a substantial improvement for the Cubs next season - Nate Silver's PECOTA standings say 92-93 wins for the Cubs, simulated standings show the Cubs as a 90+ win team; my own depth chart analysis I've been doing at my site shows the Cubs at about 92 wins.
There are plenty of analytical reasons to see the Cubs as an improved team next year.
by cwyers on Feb 25, 2008 5:07 PM CST 0 recs
92-93 wins
by ak123 on
Feb 25, 2008 5:33 PM CST
up
0 recs
It's because of the Comedy Central.
by cwyers on
Feb 25, 2008 5:46 PM CST
up
0 recs
We'll take it, right?
by Al on
Feb 25, 2008 5:47 PM CST
up
0 recs
Yes but...
by ak123 on
Feb 25, 2008 6:35 PM CST
up
0 recs
True enough.
by Al on
Feb 25, 2008 6:46 PM CST
up
0 recs
Yes
One would think it'd be a fan's delight, especially considering it's the final year of Yankee Stadium.
by John Q Freejazz on
Feb 25, 2008 6:54 PM CST
up
0 recs
Yeah...
by santoswoodenlegs on
Feb 25, 2008 5:50 PM CST
up
0 recs
To me the schedule
by Johnny Callison was a Cub on
Feb 25, 2008 5:55 PM CST
up
0 recs
AL East
Still beats the hell out of having 3 each against the Bo Sox and Yanks.........plus 6 against the feeble White Sux
by plenz on
Feb 25, 2008 6:34 PM CST
up
0 recs
Ok, I went back and took a look...
Soto: .338 vs. .355
Lee: .420 vs. .396
DeRosa: .347 vs. .342
Ramirez: .392 vs. .385
Theriot: .321 vs. .312
Soriano: .375 vs. .371
Pie: .329 vs. .328
Fukudome: .376 vs. .381
Outside of the Lee forcast nothing jumps out at me as being much above and beyond what CHONE projects. In fact, compared to CHONE Al seems a shade pessimistic about Fukudome and Soto.
My point here is that you can't sit there matching data to conclusions you've already come up with - the data has to come first. You can't just roundly declare the Cubs a 90-win team out of thin air and then start apportioning credit for those wins. You've got to take each player on their own merits, figure their value, and then aggregate that into the team as a whole.
You're acting like players are trying to apportion off a piece of the team talent pie - it's the players that drive the team's winning, and whether or not Carlos Zambrano pitches well has a whole hell of a lot more to do with his workload the past few seasons, his shoulder, and the fact that last season seriously underperformed compared to his past norms than whether or not Rich Hill pitches well.
by cwyers on
Feb 26, 2008 12:39 AM CST
up
0 recs
I look at the key
Cubs win 94 games and win the Series, I don't think anyone would mind if I predict Marquis to go 15-4.
Go Cubs
by Johnny Callison was a Cub on Feb 25, 2008 5:51 PM CST 0 recs
90 wins
by danimal15 on Feb 25, 2008 8:54 PM CST 0 recs
90 wins is my guess
The success of our season will come down to starting pitching. Pitching is KING in baseball. I have concern about our rotation. The wildcards are Rich Hill and Ryan Dempster. Hill needs to hold steady while Dempster needs to come through in reliable fashion. A major injury to Zambrano or Lilly will be enormously difficult to overcome given the marginal quality and depth of our pitching otherwise.
by MDBNIU on Feb 25, 2008 9:18 PM CST 0 recs

















