Zell, the political solution
I'm surprised that for all the attention paid to Zell's comments about selling naming rights, there is very little discussion of the political leverage Cubs fans throughout Chicago and Illinois currently have.
Its true, as Zell says, that Wrigley is "his asset" and without our own ownership interest we can't really stop him from selling the naming rights to it. But our elected leaders in State and City government absolutely can do something about it. Zell is practically begging them to purchase the stadium because the state can obtain tax-free financing, and can therefore afford to pay Zell a higher price. His analysts tell him that if he sells the stadium to a private buyer he'll get a lower return. Zell is also going to need City and State cooperation for any plan to remake or remodel Wrigley Field because of its historical landmark designation, a designation intended for just this sort of use. The cooperation of City and State officials is necessary to either of those ends; if they withhold it, the value of Zell's "asset" falls.
With that in mind, its remarkable that at the same time Zell is courting the Governor, the Mayor and hundreds of legislators, he manages to upset an untold number of their constituents. How many people would be sufficiently offended by the renaming of Wrigley Field to vote against the politicians who let it happen? Thousands? Certainly. Tens of thousands? Probably. Zell might not care what we think, but he should, because the politicians he needs to persuade will absolutely care if there are thousands of Cubs fans calling for their heads.
So, instead of focusing energy on polls that ask whether Cubs fans would go to games at a re-named Wrigley Field (they will), like the Sun Times is asking, someone should be posing the question: Would you vote to re-elect a politician who struck a deal with Sam Zell while turning a blind eye to his intention to re-name Wrigley Field? The answer to THAT poll, I think, would be a resounding "no." That's leverage, and its where we should focus our energies. If you start a "Save Wrigley" petition, make sure it lands on the desk of every politician whose consent is necessary for Zell to maximize the price for his "asset."
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
0 recs |
17 comments
Comments
I say no with the caveat
by drewishdrewid on Feb 28, 2008 4:23 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
right idea, wrong reason
adding concerts etc. Since they can't even change the marquis without city approval not sure how much value "naming " is going to have but the important thing is NOT to let him do any real long term actual damage to the park and to the sale to a serious owner who would actually want the park AND the Cubs.
I have no problem selling them seperately for tax reasons but
the state and city and state should do him no favors. What you
are I think unintentionally suggesting is that if out the kindness of his heart he agrees NOT to sell the name than they would let him get away with the things he needs their votes to do.
Bottom line, no policial support for anything that either the residents and the fans object to. JUST SELL THE DAMN TEAM
by jessica on Feb 28, 2008 4:30 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
It doesn't matter...
Without getting into political discussion here, I don't think a boycott of either of those men if they supported Zell would make a bit of difference in their re-election campaigns.
JMHO.
by Al on Feb 28, 2008 4:32 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Regardless of how this issue turns out...
by ballhawk on Feb 28, 2008 4:39 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
true, but...
by Orval Overall on Feb 28, 2008 4:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The City Council...
by Al on Feb 28, 2008 4:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm a political junkie...
DmL
by dmlichte on Feb 28, 2008 4:35 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I agree wholeheartedly!
Kasey
by kaseyi on Feb 28, 2008 5:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
LSA!!!!!!!!!
by gary varsho on Feb 28, 2008 6:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with dmlichte...
More importantly, is Wrigley Field really a historical landmark? I didn't think so (source: http://www.nps.gov/nhl/DOE_dedesignations/wrigley.htm) although I'm fairly certain features of it are protected (the marquee and possibly the scoreboard?). As such, the ability of a politician to legally block the renaming of the field is grey, at best, and illegal, at worst. I'll be the first to admit that I could be mistaken on this.
I would think it was reasonable to not vote for someone if you thought that your local politician was being bought off in order to railroad the project through approval, but that's not what your poll question is asking.
I don't particularly care about the name change, myself (no one cares that it was renamed from its Federal League days, do they?), but part of that is probably because I was originally angered by the renaming of the New Comiskey Park and have since grown to appreciate how much the new money from US Cellular went into improving the stadium. If we had to put up with "Wrigley Field: Presented by AT&T" or whatever, I could live with it so long as the improvement of facilities (especially concrete, concourses, concessions, bathrooms) received some portion of the funds. The recent woes of Macy's in this area (after their takeover of Fields) should keep potential corporate sponsors from altering things too much, I should think, in any case.
That's my take, for what it's worth.
by MarchHare on Feb 28, 2008 5:04 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Loud, sustained applause.
That, I am 100% in favor of.
by Al on Feb 28, 2008 5:31 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It should, but it won't.
by ctcoff99 on Feb 28, 2008 10:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I know I'm in the minority, but
by cubswin on Feb 28, 2008 5:12 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Since when...

by santoswoodenlegs on Feb 28, 2008 5:22 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Voting in Chicago
At least I was still alive last time I looked...
by MN exile on Feb 28, 2008 5:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
A fair compromise.
by ctcoff99 on Feb 28, 2008 10:21 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
And BTW....
by ctcoff99 on Feb 28, 2008 10:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 





















