Something about Murton
Murton has a lifetime OPS around .820, which is not bad at all, especially if you think his best years are still ahead. Nonetheless, somehow I have gotten the impression that he hasn't performed well interms of knocking people in (RBI's). I wonder if it's just an impression I got or if the stats corroborate this. More than his numbers (AVG/OBP/SLG/OPS) with runners on, I think a good stat would be RBI's per baserunners, and comparing that with other players in the league. I remembering seeing this stat at mlbtraderumors.com and I liked it. I don't have the time to do that analysis right now but I wonder if I'm the only one who has this feeling about Murton.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation, Bleed Cubbie Blue, or Al Yellon, editor-in-chief. FanPost opinions are, however, valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
0 recs |
27
comments
Comments
Interesting
Career splits
Murton with men on base:
.249/.338/.354 in 397 PA
Murton with the bases empty:
.330/.385/.527 in 532 PA
Conclusion: Matt Murton should lead-off.
by DGU on Mar 1, 2008 11:01 AM CST 0 recs
Oh now that's just silly.
by sitrick2 on
Mar 1, 2008 12:26 PM CST
up
0 recs
How's he supposed to lead off
=)
by gjdow on
Mar 1, 2008 1:03 PM CST
up
0 recs
Pie
by Ryno8 on
Mar 1, 2008 1:23 PM CST
up
0 recs
are we talking apples and banana's or something
BTW do you know the Cubs W/L record when Pie played last year? That is the real statistic isn't it.....
by Ivy Walls on
Mar 1, 2008 2:33 PM CST
up
0 recs
The problem with Murton
In 2005, his home run / flyball rate was 22.3%; ie he hit 22.3 home runs for every 100 flyballs.
In 2006, 12.8%.
In 2007, 10.9%.
Iso slugging: 200, 147, 157
Most sluggers / power hitter are around 20% or better for HR / F.
by rfloh on Mar 1, 2008 3:35 PM CST 0 recs
Phrased that badly
by rfloh on
Mar 1, 2008 3:38 PM CST
up
0 recs
not true
by kylejo on
Mar 1, 2008 4:24 PM CST
up
0 recs
aramis ramirez
by kylejo on
Mar 1, 2008 4:26 PM CST
up
0 recs
Several points
Furthermore, by slugger, I mean a corner OF / 1b.
Not someone who hits well while playing a premium D position like ARAM, or Soriano, who until last year was a 2b.
by rfloh on
Mar 2, 2008 12:56 AM CST
up
0 recs
League average is about 11%.
by cwyers on
Mar 1, 2008 8:09 PM CST
up
0 recs
I know what league average is
A corner OF with little to no baserunning value, who does not play good D, and who does not have a great contact skills, and who has platoon issues, needs to do better than league average.
Murton's OPS was also league average the last 2 years. Do you consider it acceptable, considering he as a corner OF?
The point is that Murton has not performed well in the last 2 years, because his power has vanished for whatever reason. Or because 2005 was a fluke that is not going to happen again.
He might very well get it back. In which case, he becomes a better player.
by rfloh on
Mar 2, 2008 1:01 AM CST
up
0 recs
Considering that Murton's...
And Murton is an above-average defensive player in left field, according to most zone rating metrics.
And he's turning 26 next season. Power develops later than other skills - he's right at the cusp of his prime, and I would expect his power to increase. He's never going to be mistaken for a Bash Brother, but with an OBP like his its certainly more livable than you're suggesting.
by cwyers on
Mar 2, 2008 2:22 AM CST
up
0 recs
Let's see
In 2007, Murton's OBP was 352, league average at Wrigley was again 347, that is roughly, over a full season, 1 run above average.
Both Batting Runs, a linear weights runs estimator, and Batting Runs above average from BPro, weight OBP correctly.
By Batting Runs, he was 2.8 runs above average offensively in 2006.
By BRAA, 7 runs above average.
2007, Batting Runs, 0.2 runs below average, BRAA 1 run above average.
For comparison, to compare him with another corner OF who plays in Chicago, Jermaine Dye was 2 runs above average by Batting Runs in 2007, 2 runs above average by BRAA.
Outside of 2005, Murton was a league average offensive player, in line with his league average OPS.
A corner OF who hits like a league average player is a mediocre player, and easily replaced by journeyman like Russ Branyan etc.
In 2007, in LF, Zone Rating, converted into runs, had him at 2 runs above average defensively. RZR at 5 runs above average.
But, in RF, ZR, 1 run BELOW average. RZR 3 runs BELOW average.
He played more in RF than LF, 282 innings to 185 innings. Why are you just focusing on the smaller sample size in LF, and ignoring the larger sample in right?
by rfloh on
Mar 2, 2008 4:43 AM CST
up
0 recs
because we know
and you do not address the fact that his slugging numbers, and overall numbers should continue to increase as he is entering his prime. if he was league average, or a little above league average offensively as a 24 and 25-year-old, what will his offensive output be when he is 27, 28?
by kylejo on
Mar 2, 2008 11:04 AM CST
up
0 recs
If you actually read my posts
What I AM saying is that, UNLESS he improves he is a journeyman.
As to him being a LF, sure. He is slightly above average at LF. OTOH, him only being able to play LF reduces his value. Whether on the Cubs, or any team that he is traded to, he is now competing only for one spot, not 2.
A league average hitter at a corner OF position is mediocre. Players who hit like league average hitters while playing corner OF end up bouncing around the league.
A league average hitter as a corner OF with slightly above average D, is still not average overall.
Russ Branyan has been a slightly above league average hitter over his career. He is versatile enough to play both corners, and also 3b and 1b. He is a journeyman bouncing from team to team.
by rfloh on
Mar 2, 2008 12:55 PM CST
up
0 recs
you know i did read your post
by kylejo on
Mar 2, 2008 11:27 PM CST
up
0 recs
He didn't really lose his power....
by MPH73 on
Mar 3, 2008 8:55 AM CST
up
0 recs
Precident
Would I bat Murton leadoff full time? Probably not. But for the odd start, it wouldn't be terrible. In games with DH's, it might even make sense to do it.
by Ross on Mar 1, 2008 6:58 PM CST 0 recs
Guys
by Comfortably Numb on Mar 2, 2008 7:45 AM CST 0 recs
we're just having a discussion
ha, and why would you enter this thread if you thought it was pointless?
by kylejo on
Mar 2, 2008 11:06 AM CST
up
0 recs
Hey - I'll say this
And this is why it's worth knowing what you have on-roster down-roster. It's worth a conversation on what Eric Patterson really is before we go and trade for a lefty-speedy 2B. It's worth a conversation on what the Seans are before signing another starter long-term.
Maybe if the Cubs organization had had a better conversation about what was already on roster, last year, we could have started the year with JJ in CF, Sori in RF and Floyd/Murton in LF, instead of being too afraid to ask Sori to try RF after he didn't work out in CF. Maybe we could have brought up Soto earlier instead of trading for Kendall?
by DGU on
Mar 2, 2008 1:49 PM CST
up
0 recs
murton
by NOMAR on Mar 2, 2008 8:41 AM CST 0 recs
Matt Murton doesn't have a role
by MDBNIU on Mar 2, 2008 12:58 PM CST 0 recs
We can afford to send Murton to AAA
by DGU on
Mar 2, 2008 1:51 PM CST
up
0 recs
Can we do that?
by astroview on
Mar 2, 2008 11:23 PM CST
up
0 recs
I'm pretty sure
by DGU on
Mar 3, 2008 10:10 AM CST
up
0 recs


















